Reports until 19:36, Tuesday 19 August 2025
H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:36, Tuesday 19 August 2025 - last comment - 07:57, Wednesday 20 August 2025(86469)
Problem with DHARD WFS, CARM offset reduction

We kept losing lock at DHARD WFS, and Jenne and I spent a lot of time figuring out why. Here are some notes about things that we tried:

How I solved the problem:

Some final notes about minor mistakes I made after:

Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 07:57, Wednesday 20 August 2025 (86475)

Apologies for missing this detail in my original alog, but we had run two successful initial alignments. The first was run as usual after the end of the maintenance day. Green alignment converged properly, arm alignment looked good. We ran a second after the early problems with DHARD, thinking that maybe the alignment was poor. Same results, good green convergence, but problems with DHARD.

In general, the alignment of the arms and corners looked very good through this whole process. When I stepped in DHARD P and Y, I was making very small steps overall to correct the alignment, steps on the order of 0.01 or 0.03. In general, the buildups and the camera showed good alignment. The green arms also stayed well aligned when the DHARD signal engaged properly, which is telling me that our initial alignment was doing the correct thing for the ITMS. Is it possible that the CARM offset was too large? I have been wondering this, because if the alignment was decent but the WFS signal was junk because we were too far from resonance that might explain this behavior, and it lines up with the fact that the better fix was reducing the carm offset more before moving to REFL. I'm not sure if that makes sense though.

As a side note, DRMI was mostly locking very quickly throughout the night.