Jason Ryan Jenne Daniel
We reduced the PSL power after the amplifier and before the AOM by a factor of 2.3. We then re-adjusted the power into the IMC to get back to 2W. This reduced the IMC reflected light power by ~2.7. This seems to strongly indicate that we have a heating issue in the path from the PMC to the polarizer. The following tests were run:
Normal PSL setup |
PMC inp |
EOM inp power reduced |
EOM inp power reduced |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
EOM power (W) | 115 | 50.8 | 49.6 | 87 |
IMC input power (W) | 2.01 | 2.05 | 2.02 | 2.04 |
IMC REFL power (mW) | 1.10 | 0.405 | 0.49 | 0.64 |
Attaching a trend showing that the PMC refl has been increasing gradually since Feb, and that there was a jump at the time of the power outage.
When the power into the PMC was low, the mode matching was worse, this is probably expected due to thermal lensing in the PMC.
Elenna, Sheila
Before the power outage, IM4 trans was 93% of the IMC input power. Yesterday, we had 90% of IMC input power at IM4 trans. Today after lowering the power through the EOM, we have 91%.