At the time of starting the calibration suite, we had been locked for 8.5 hours and so were fully thermalized.
Broadband
2025-09-20 18:32:12 - 18:37:23 UTC
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_BB/PCALY2DARM_BB_20250920T183212Z.xml
Simulines
2025-09-20 18:38:50 - 19:02:14 UTC
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250920T183850Z.hdf5
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20250920T183850Z.hdf5
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20250920T183850Z.hdf5
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20250920T183850Z.hdf5
/ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20250920T183850Z.hdf5
Adding a comment here to note two things:
The thermalization adjustment of the SRCL offset appears to still be performing well according to the grafana page.
There is a 2% difference in TST actuation strength between the model that was pushed on 8/23 to the model created from this measurement. This is also reflected in kappa TST being about 1.02 after thermalization. This is likely due to charging. Tagging CAL and SUS.