Reports until 11:39, Wednesday 15 October 2025
H1 General
ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:39, Wednesday 15 October 2025 - last comment - 12:11, Wednesday 15 October 2025(87485)
OPS Wednesday DAY shift start

TITLE: 10/15 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 150Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 0mph Gusts, 0mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.08 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.13 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 09:03, Wednesday 15 October 2025 (87487)

It looks like the same PI that rung up yesterday and almost caused a lockloss is still ringing up, although not as strongly. This suggests, along with other evidence, that we are still not at the right beam position on ETMY. This is on the to-do list to investigate tomorrow, and hopefully we will stop ringing up this PI. See 87473.

ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 10:57, Wednesday 15 October 2025 (87488)

The circulating power looks lower than the previous weeks locks, kappa_c also looks lower this lock.

Images attached to this comment
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 10:01, Wednesday 15 October 2025 (87489)

Ryan's data above in consistent with what we saw yesterday too. This makes me think that we should readjust the spot before running the calibration measurement tomorrow.

ryan.crouch@LIGO.ORG - 11:14, Wednesday 15 October 2025 (87493)

I ran the range comparison against a lock last week with better range, lot of extra low frequency noise.

Non-image files attached to this comment
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 11:26, Wednesday 15 October 2025 (87494)

We did not load the camera servo guardian yesterday after the changes, so the new camera offsets did not get properly loaded and engaged when the camera servos came on. We are back at the old camera offsets for ETMY, but at new A2L gains based on where we set the camera offsets yesterday. So, the buildups are bad because we're at the wrong beamspot on EY, and the sensitivity is bad because the beam spot is not lined up with the mirror actuation point, so we have extra ASC coupling, as Ryan's plot above shows.

Neither the A2L gains nor the camera offsets are monitored in SDF, so this was not caught until just now.

elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 12:11, Wednesday 15 October 2025 (87496)

Calibration monitoring line at 33 Hz was also 1% worse than yesterday.

Images attached to this comment