Restored the alignment sliders for IM2 and IM3 back to Monday values ([IM2P, Y] =[765, -187.7], [IM3P, Y]=[-560.7, 320]).

Measured the flashes. Chose the flash that gave the MC2 trans sum maximum power, which in general agreed with IM4 trans sum max but didn't with ISS QPD nor array PD inner sum nor outer sum. 

Anyway, 

• MC2 trans: SUM=21; seg1=0.0027; seg2=0.0029; seg3=0.0024; seg4=0.0022
  • i.e. PIT=0.098, YAW=-0.039
• IM4 trans: SUM=0.0276; seg1=0.00876; seg2= 0.00760; seg3=0.00456; seg4=0.00526
  • i.e. PIT=0.25, YAW=0.07
• ISS QPD: SUM 362; seg1=67; seg2=13; seg3=13; seg4=271
  • i.e. PIT= -0.56, YAW=0.86
• ISS Inner: SUM 0.023
• ISS Outer: SUM 0.104

PIT and YAW numbers were after normalization divided by (seg1+2+3+4), not by SUM, so there's a small difference but that doesn't matter at this point.

IM4 TRANS and ISS QPD PIT and YAW are broadly in agreement with Jenne's alog 90206 i.e.

• IM4 Trans Pit 0.2 Yaw 0.05 (Monday)
• ISS QPD Pit -0.53 YAW 0.85 (Monday)

I haven't compared the ISS Outer SUM with March 2026 when IMC was locked with 2W. Somebody check please. We'll go into chamber and start checking the beam path.