Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 09:59, Thursday 25 June 2026
H1 SUS
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:59, Thursday 25 June 2026 - last comment - 09:22, Friday 26 June 2026(90747)
QOSEM SatAmp to QOSEM Cable Resistance

Jeff, Betsy, Arnaud, Oli

Yesterday afternoon we went to the BBSS QOSEM satamp and checked the coil resistance. We did this by putting the BBSS in SAFE and then unplugging the Satamp to Duopus cables one by one. Each of these three cables have the pins for two QOSEMs, split as CH1 + CH2, CH3 + CH4, and CH5 + CH6. Each cable was unplugged and then the pins for each coil probed. Below are the results. These values are all pretty similar.

Coil Resistance (Satamp to Duopus)
  CH1-2 (SUS_BS_81) CH3-4 (SUS_BS_82) CH5-6 (SUS_BS_83)
Channel CH1 CH2 CH3 CH4 CH5 CH6
CH Coil Pins 23 -> 10 18 -> 5 23 -> 10 18 -> 5 23 -> 10 18 -> 5
OSEM Mapping F1 F2 F3 SD LF RT
Coil Resistance 39.1 +/- 0.1 Ohm 40.0 +/- 0.2 Ohm 39.0 +/- 0.2 Ohm 39.7 +/- 0.2 Ohm 40.0 +/- 1.5 Ohm 40.5 +/- 0.5 Ohm
Notes         Larger than normal variation  
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:22, Friday 26 June 2026 (90773)
Picture of the setup: (in this instance) the QOSEM CH 3-4 (i.e. F3 and SD) SUS_BS_82 cable is disconnected at the QOSEM satamp in SUS-R2, and its "to chamber" end is connected to a standard D25 breakout board. Clip leads are connected across the pins as described above to gather the coil resistance.

These results are as expected: the QOSEMs are up-cycle bodies and coils from BOSEMs, which are known to have resistance of ~40 [Ohm], in this case 40 +/- 2.5%.

Note, this is markedly different than the 35 +/- 10% [Ohm] -- 31.5 to 38.5 [Ohm] -- assumed in LHO:90743. Maybe Tom is assuming that this is the coil resistance if measured directly at the coil flexi-circuit terminals, and the "extra" resistance is from the long cable run to the chamber which is what we typically measure.

However, the 2.5% spread in coil resistance values between F1, F2, and F3, is NOT enough of an imbalance to explain the worrisome P to Y cross-coupling seen at DC (LHO:90728 and LHO:90739) and in the M1 to M1 transfer functions (LHO:90765).
Images attached to this comment
Displaying report 1-1 of 1.