Reports until 09:58, Thursday 13 August 2026
H1 SQZ
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:58, Thursday 13 August 2026 - last comment - 12:13, Thursday 13 August 2026(91497)
HAM7 SQZ Work, 99% Done, Wednesday August 12th
Sheila, Ryan S, Camilla,
Cartoon Layout D2000021

We have completed all HAM7 close out tasks as in E2600157. Only thing left is that we may repeat 88609 backscatter tests tomorrow before SEI closeout tasks. Rahul and Ryan C completed SUS closeout measurements 91500.

Mode matching
We are happy with our mode matching after the adjustments Ryan and Rahul made yesterday, 91484.We have predicted mode mismatch <0.5% and astigmatism ~0.5%. 
 
Losses
Today we're taking a final look at reducing our losses through the OPOS and final checks before close out. I'll post what we did in the comments but we think we spent a lot of time just chasing clipping on our ZM3 iris. After all irises were removed, we measured powers below, using the crane for the out of the OPO and centering on the power meter with a VRC2D1 IR pinhole aperture:

This is a loss of: 7.8%, 5.4%, 5.4%. We expect 4% but have been measuring up to 8% 91444 so are happy with this and will revisit in a future vent with different equipment. It is hard to look for 1% loss when our method gives us 1-2% variation. 

Co-alignment
As we've seen before, green and red beams were off in yaw. We pico'ed H:M1 and H:M2 to coalign green with IR. 
 
Retrorefection
We were happy with the retrofection of the IR beam off FC1. Our new technique to check this is to move the beam off ~200urad using ZM3 in Pitch (plus undoing the move on the yaw osems from cross coupling) to check yaw and vice versa to check pitch. 
 
Checked beam in HAM6
We temporarily removed the VP cover and guillotine in the HAM5 relay tube and opened the beam diverter. Beam was on AS A, B and C with expected powers, also on OMC A and B. Turned on ASC loops DC centering 3 and 4 and the SQZ beam was centered on AS_B,C and OMC_A/B without saturating OM1 and OM2. Plot attached.
 
Checked beams on diodes
Checked that there was light on all rejected fiber diodes, previously checked centering and beam dumps 91197, checked there was light on the WFS (did not turn down power to check centering but we have picos if adjustment needed later. 
 
Checked FC Refl on Periscope
The FC REFL beam was missing the lower pericope mirror so we raised the height of it on the UPM using H:M4. 
 
Checked and removed all Irises
We checked irises, we were a little low on ZM3 and ZM5 iris and a little to -X on the ZM3 iris. As long as were are hitting FC1 in the correct place and retroflected this doesn't matter, irises were just to stop us loosing alignment. We removed all irises and checked for knobs. 
 
Check for stray beams
Ryan and I scanned using the IR viewer and iPhone cameras and saw no stray un-dumped beams.
 
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 12:13, Thursday 13 August 2026 (91519)

Yesterday morning we spent time searching for losses, we later realized the ~2% loss we were chasing was caused by at temporary iris we had set at the beam at ZM3, next time we should use a larger 2" iris. Here is our results. 

We checked the sliders of ZM2 and ZM3 by in turn putting a +/-10urad wobble on each and adjusting the sliders to be in the middle of the slider values where we started clipping: This gave us a repeatable 0.3% power improvement on the SQZT7 IR PD for <5urad slider changes. 

In HAM7, as our main extra loss location is SFI1, we wanted to see if we could reduce this, before committing to moving A:M1 or A:M2,we tried moving ZM1 in yaw with the power meter on a crane after the SFI1 second pass (between SFI1 and B:M1). We found that the power was repeatably higher with ZM1 with -150urad in yaw, so sliders at (P 800, Y -240).  Data attached.

Method of using Thorlabs power meter: We added the Thorlabs VRC2D1 IR pinhole aperture to the front of the power meter, moved power to maximize power though the pinhole and then removed pinhole and measure power.

We then put the power meter after the first pass of SFI1, between SFI1 and A:L2. We moved A:M1, starting with the thumb knob at 2pm, our clockwise edge of where we started clipping was clockwise 200deg to 9o'clock. The Anti clockwise edge was 360deg from starting location to 2 o'clock. So we are not 100% centered but not very near the edge.  We could not see any repeatable power changes by moving a quarter turn of the knob. Data attached. We put A:M1 back to starting location. 

This makes sense as on the first pass through SFI1 we could not improve the loss with alignment but on the second pass we could as the beam was double passes the iris that was causing clipping. 

Non-image files attached to this comment