Displaying report 1-1 of 1.
Reports until 15:09, Thursday 30 January 2014
H1 ISC
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:09, Thursday 30 January 2014 - last comment - 00:30, Friday 15 January 2016(9630)
REFLAIR and POPAIR PD chain check

I have been silently checking the signal chain of the REFLAIR and POPAIR RFPDs using the AM laser (a.k.a. PD calibrator) to make sure that they are functional expectedly.

Summary

The RF frequency of the AM modulation was adjusted in each measurement such that the demodulated IF signal was below 50 Hz.


Calibration of the amplitude modulation depth

We recalibrated the AM laser.

The current setting of the laser was changed recently because we opened up the current driver when we thought the laser diode had been dead in the early December. Then the laser head and its current driver were sent to Rich at Caltech for his extensive testing although the laser magically fixed itself and he didn't find anything wrong. So this was the first time for us to use the AM laser which had been fixed. Because of that mysterious event, I wanted to recalibrate the laser. First of all, Yuta and I measured the power to be 2 mW with an Ophir Vega without the attenuation filter. Then we measured the modulation depth for the amplitude modulation by using a Newfocus 1611 as a reference.

The new calibration for the amplitude modulation is:

P_am =  5.13 mW x (P_dc / 1 mW) * (1 V / V_drive)

where P_dc is the laser power at DC and V_drive is the drive voltage when it is driven by a 50 Ohm source. For example, if one puts this laser to a PD which then shows a DC laser power of say 2 mW, the AM coefficient is now 5.13 mW x ( 2 mW / 1 mW) /V_drive = 10.26 mW/V_drive.


REFLAIR_A_RF9 (S1203919)

Remarks:

The signal chain is OK. The PD response is smaller by 15% for some reason.

It seems as if the transimpedance is smaller by 15% than what had been measured at Caltech (LIGO-S1203919). The cable loss from the RFPD to the rack was measured to be 0.47 dB. Be aware that the demod gain is half of the quad I/Q demodulator because this is a dual channel demod (see E1100044). The demod conversion gain is assumed to be 10.9 according to LIGO-F1100004-v4.


REFLAIR_A_RF45 (S1203919)

Remarks:

The signal chain is healthy.

Found cable loss of about 1.5 dB. The measurements excellently agree with the loss-included expectation.


POPAIR_A_RF9 (S1300521)

Remarks:

The signal chain is healthy.

The measurement suggests that there is loss of 1 dB somewhere. I didn't measure the cable loss this time.


POPAIR_A_RF45 (S1300521)

Remarks:

The signal chain is OK. Though loss sounds a bit too high.

The measurement suggests a possible loss of 2.6 dB somewhere. I didn't measure the cable loss.


REFLAIR_B_RF27 (S1200234)

Remarks:

The signal gain is bigger than the expectation by a factor of 2.3.


REFLAIR_B_RF135 (S1200234)

Remarks:

The signal gain is bigger than the expectation by a factor of 1.5


POPAIR_B_RF18 (S1200236)

Remarks:

The signal gain is bigger than the expectation by a factor of 2.3


POPAIR_B_RF90 (S1200236)

Remarks:

The signal gain matches with the expected value, but I don't believe this.

Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 17:16, Thursday 30 January 2014 (9678)

There was a typo:

P_am =  5.13 mW x (P_dc / 1 mW) * (1 V / V_drive)

P_am = 5.13 mW x (P_dc / 1 mW) x (V_drive / 1 V)

koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 18:38, Thursday 30 January 2014 (9686)

For 27MHz and 136.5MHz, the RF gains are +19.8dB and +50.7dB, respectively. S1400079

 

daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 22:46, Thursday 30 January 2014 (9696)

The response of the BBPD isn't really flat over all frequencies. See D1002969.

koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - 12:59, Friday 31 January 2014 (9719)

The description in D1002969 is for the initial version. (The schematics seems up-to-date.)

The latest version has the rf performance as attached.

Non-image files attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 13:11, Wednesday 05 February 2014 (9845)

This is a follow up of the calibration measurements for REFLAIR_B and POPAIR_B.

I have updated the expected signal gain for these photo detector chains using more realistic gains which Koji gave (see his comments above). Now all the values make sense. Note I did not perform any new measurements.

In the following calculations, the quantity in red represent the updated parameters.

 


REFLAIR_B_RF27(S1200234)

Remarks:

The signal chain is healthy. There is loss of 0.92 dB somewhere.

  • Expected AM at 27 MHz = 5.13 mW x (1.045 mW / 1 mW) x 0.05 V_drivepp x 0.4 A/W x 2.1 kOhm = 225 mVpp
  • Expected ADC counts = 19.8dB (S1400079-v1) x 225 mVpp x 10.9 x 2^16/40 counts/V = 39294 counts pp
  • Measured ADC counts = 35431 counts pp
    • The signal is smaller by 0.92 dB than the expected.

REFLAIR_B_RF135(S1200234)

Remarks:

The signal chain is OK. There is loss of 3.9 dB somewhere.

  • Expected AM at 135 MHz = 5.13 mW x (1.045 mW / 1 mW) x 0.0014 V_drivepp x 0.4 A/W x 1 kOhm = 3 mVpp
  • Expected ADC counts = 50.7 dB (S1400079-v1) x 3 mVpp x 10.9 x 2^16/40 counts/V = 18377 counts pp
  • Measured ADC counts = 11689 counts pp
    • The signal is smaller by 3.9 dB than the expected.

POPAIR_B_RF18 (S1200236)

Remarks:

The signal chain is healthy. The signal was bigger by 9% than the expected.

  • Expected AM at 18 MHz = 5.13 mW x (0.93 mW / 1 mW) x 0.1 V_drivepp x 0.4 A/W x 2.1 kOhm = 401 mVpp
  • Expected ADC counts = 401 mVpp x 10.9 x 2^16/40 counts /V = 7157 counts pp
  • Measured ADC counts = 7803 counts pp
    • The signal is greater by 9 % than the expected.

POPAIR_B_RF90 (S1200236)

Remarks:

The signal chain is healthy. There is loss of 1.2 dB somewhere.

  • Expected AM at 90 MHz = 5.13 mW x (0.93 mW / 1 mW) x 0.1 V_drivepp x 0.4 A/W x 1.2 kOhm = 229 mVpp
  • Expected ADC counts = 229 mVpp x 10.9 x 2^16/40 counts/V = 4090 counts pp
  • Measured ADC counts = 3549 counts pp
    • This is smaller than the expected by 1.2 dB
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 14:08, Wednesday 06 January 2016 (24728)

From these measurements, we can use POPAIR to infer the calibration for POP.

I looked at a recent lock acquisition while the interferometer was trying to engage the outer ISS loop. The LSC is relatively stable during this time, and the POP beam diverter is still open.

After undoing whitening gain and digital gain (2 ct/ct for POPAIR9/45, and 32 ct/ct for POP9/45), we find the following TFs:

  • POP9I/POPAIR9I = 0.19 ct/ct
  • POP45Q/POPAIR45Q = 0.21 ct/ct

This implies calibrations of 1.7×106 ct/W for POP9 and 1.8×106 ct/W for POP45.

Images attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 00:30, Friday 15 January 2016 (24959)

There's a factor of 4 difference in power between POP and POPAIR (17 mW versus 68 mW with a PSL power of 23 W), so the values I gave above are off by a factor of 4. The demod gains should be 6.4×106 ct/W for POP9 and 7.2×106 ct/W for POP45.

Displaying report 1-1 of 1.