(Correction Jan/31: Sheila's made a similar plot for a period (https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=9691) where the cavity was locked all the time, and it seems like the plot presented here was sampling only a small edge of the 00 lock range.)
As of now, it seems like both ETM and ITM should be within 0.3 urad pk-pk from the optimal alignment to stay locked on 00 mode.
Plot 1: I took OL and green transmission data for 5 minutes when the cavity was going back and forth between 00 and 01 mostly without losing lock.
In the top panel, the transmission time series is actually the sum of the SHG and the transmission, but it's on 00 mode when it was 1400 counts, 01 when it was between 1000 and 1200 counts.
Plot 2: 2D color map of the above data.
X axis is ITM OL PIT, Y is ETM. I arbitrary set the threshold of 1300 counts for green transmission and subtracted that from the transmission data, and set the color map such that orange-red color is above 0 (i.e. locked to 00 mode), yellow-green is negative (01 mode).
Each cell is normalized by the number of data points in that cell. Blue means there's no data point in that cell.
Sorry that X and Y axis scaling is different. To aid your eyes, I put white and pink diagonal lines showing the direction of common (soft) and differential (hard) misalignment.
Plot 3: 2D plot of where the OLs were staying.
You cannot tell from plot 2 where the OL was staying the most, so here is the number of data points in each cell divided by the total number of data points. Adding everything on this map together you'll get 1.
On average EX=-28.12, IX=-6.28.
Conclusion:
Note that this is dependent on RF sideband frequency.
Note the bogus or inconsistent sign convention of OLs.
For ETM, when the optic tilts down (increase in PIT slider), OL PIT increases, while for ITM OL PIT decreases.
That's the reason why the hard (differential) mode is parallel to the line ETMX=ITMX.