Displaying reports 1-20 of 85335.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End
Reports until 22:02, Wednesday 29 October 2025
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:02, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87845)
Ops EVE Shift End

TITLE: 10/30 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: Observing at 150 Mpc and have been locked for almost 9.5 hours. I ended up not turning the damping gains back on for ETMX mode 6 or ETMY mode 1/6 in case I rang them up and lost damping progress, but they seem to be making their way downtown, walking slowly. Quiet shift with nothing else to report.
LOG:

23:04-05UTC Helicopter flying overhead

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
21:29 SPI Corey, Ryan Opt lab n First contacting optics 23:52
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:03, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87844)
Ops EVE Midshift Status

Observing at 150 Mpc and have been Locked for 7.5 hours. Nothing to report

X1 SEI (SEI)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:20, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87843)
First Step Of Cleaning SPI In-Vac Optics: Cleaning Barrels Of Around 30 Optics

(C.Gray, R.Short)

Spent about 1-day of work getting set-up, organized, game-plan in motion and finally starting the first round of cleaning for the in-vac SPI optics (Suspension Point Interferometer).  Ryan and I did this cleaning on a flow bench in the Optics Table, and we have decided to clean all the optics at once step by step.  The first step we did was cleaning all the barrels of these 1" (mostly) & 2" optics.  This step took roughly about 2-hrs.  

Next steps would be drag wipe & First Contact-ing the front & back faces of the optics.  

NOTES:

1) There are some 2" PLCX (plano convex) optics which are a bit odd to clean/handle.  (1) The curved convex surface might be tough to First Contact.  (2) These optics don't fit in our PETG "clean" optic containers (just mentioned to Betsy and she said we might install them into their optical mounts or lay them in a pan wrapped in lens tissue).  (See images 9302 & 9300 below)

2) Some of the 1" optics are in PETG containers which are not great for our "thick" beamsplitters.  So one needs to be careful unwrapping these beamsplitters later on---so the lid & optic don't fall out--OPEN CAREFULLY please!  

Images attached to this report
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:45, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87842)
Ops Day Shift End

(Pretend this was posted by TJ)

TITLE: 10/29 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 150Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY: Two relocks, both lock losses caused by earthquakes. Both relocked needed an initial alignment and needed the high gain ASC to avoid the 1 Hz ringup. While locked recently, EY violin mode1/6 started to slowly ring up. I tried many settings and the best I found was Mode 1 +60 -0.2 gain, but I wouldn't say it worked, just made it not grow as fast. While we were looking at this ETMX mode 6 also started to grow. When Oli tried to damp it we noticed large changes in the DCPD window traces on the FOM. See attached. The line at 500Hz in DARM also went down by about an order of magnitude, all almost instantly. The violin mode monitors didn't show a change though. No clue what happened but the violins aren't terrible.

We've been observing for 4 hours.

LOG:

1558 Observing

1722 Lock loss

1940 Observing

Start Time System Name Location Lazer_Haz Task Time End
14:44 FAC Kim Opt lab n Tech clean 15:36
15:20 FAC Randy Xarm n BTE sealing between MX and EX 22:03
17:42 SPI Corey, Betsy, Ryan S Opt Lab n Optics cleaning (Betsy out 1905) 19:38
19:17 IO Rahul Opt Lab LOCAL JM optic measurements 20:02
19:59 IO Keita Opt Lab n Cleanup of ISS Array 21:55
21:29 SPI Corey, Ryan Opt lab n First contacting optics ongoing
21:47 PCAL Tony PCAL Lab LOCAL Swapping spheres 22:12
Images attached to this report
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:33, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87840)
Ops EVE Shift Start

TITLE: 10/29 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 150Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: USEISM
    Wind: 8mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.46 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

Observing at 150Mpc and have been Locked for almost 4 hours. We have  a couple of violins that are a bit high but don't seem to be getting worse. I might try damping them if they seem to get worse or don't start coming down.

H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:26, Wednesday 29 October 2025 - last comment - 13:30, Wednesday 29 October 2025(87831)
Lock loss 1722UTC

There was an earthquake moving through at the time of the lock loss, but it seemed as though the worst of it had already passed when we lost lock.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 12:52, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87832)

Back to observing at 1940UTC.

Relocking was slow. PRMI locked twice but I couldn't get DRMI to lock despite good looking flashes. I ran an initial alignment and then afterward DRMI eventually locked. The 1Hz ringup showed up again. I tried upping the CSOFT P  gain from 25->30 which didn't help , so I moved SEI_ENV to HIGH_ASC_EQ. This saved it.

thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 13:30, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87834)SEI

Looking at this with Jim and it seems there was a useism burst during this earhtquake, right after the majority of the r wave passed through. This was enough to cause a lock loss for us.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:22, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87830)
Wed CP1 Fill

Wed Oct 29 10:05:17 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 5min 13secs

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:58, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87829)
Observing 1558UTC

Relock required an initial alignment, and then there was usual ringup that started near the end of the locking sequence. I had to turn on high gain ASC to damp it down. I used SEI_ENV to do it by going to manual, requesting high ASC state, then once we were at NLN going back to auto and letting it go out of that state on its own to recover the ASC.

Observing at 1558UTC.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:51, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87828)
EY CDS Geist environment monitor issues

Tuesday morning the Geist 1250 CDS computer rack environment monitor unit at EY was found to be stuck at its last value as of 04:53 Sunday 26oct2025. Erik found the front panel display as showing these last values, and the ethernet link light was flashing rapidly. The unit (env-ey-1) could not be pinged. Erik power cycled the unit and it came back in an operational state. 

This unit failed again at 01:15 Wed 29oct2025 after having ran for about 17 hours.

Note that to show future sensor failure yesterday I made a change the the MEDM screens to show the STATUS PV as a warning color (see attached)

 

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:38, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87827)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 10/29 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 11mph Gusts, 7mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.14 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.65 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: Lost lock from a pair of earthquakes off the Oregon coast, ending a 13 hour lock. Running initial alignment now. Other than a dust alarm in the optics lab, no other alarms. Secondary useism is up overnight. Hopefully it wont be an issue, but its getting close to that point.

 

LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:45, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87814)
CP1 LN2 Fill Line Pump Down

(Jordan V., Gerardo M.)
Connected valves to be able to pump down the CP1 LN2 fill line, we started with 26 micron of pressure and we pumped down on the system with a scroll pump for most of the maintenance period, we stopped the pump down of the fill line at around 11:45 AM with pressure down to 4 micron.  Both valves were closed before turning off the scroll pump.  Hoses, adapter and valves remain connected, we intent to visit this item next week again.

 

 

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:00, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87826)
Ops EVE Shift End

TITLE: 10/29 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 148Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY: 

Observing at 151 Mpc and have been Locked for 4.5 hours. Relocking today after maintenance was a bit strange, with two locklosses right after passing through CLOSE_BEAM_DIVERTERS. After the second attempt ended in a lockloss, during our third relocking attempt, we got stuck in PREP_DC_READOUT_TRANSITION for a bit until we discovered that the changes to the OMC whitening gain changes that had been happening as we lost lock hadn't been reverted (87813). We fixed that and continued to LASER_NOISE_SUPPRESSION, where we sat for a longer amount of time than it would have normally taken us to get up to where we lost lock the last two times. While waiting, we encountered the 1 Hz ringup again (seen during the previous two locking attempts as well), and turned on the hi asc gains to combat it. We eventually stepped up to ADS_TO_CAMERAS, then were able to turn off the hi asc gains without it ringing up again. We stepped one-by-one through the net few guardian states, waiting for a lockloss, which ended up not happening! Everything looked good so we went into Observing.

We don't know what was causing those two locklosses, but at the very least I looked through the logs and found that they didn't happen at the same spot in the locking sequence, so that rules out anything from OMC_WHITENING (and obviously CLOSE_BEAM_DIVERTERS) (first lockloss log, second lockloss log).

LOG:

23:30UTC Attempting relock #3 after maintenance day
    - Paused in LASER_NOISE_SUPPRESSION
    - Turned on hi gains because of 1Hz ringup
    - Turned off hi gains
    - 1 Hz started ringing up, turned hi gains back on
    - Stepped to ADS_TO_CAMERAS
    - Once ADS_TO_CAMERAS was done, turned hi gains off to see if we still had the ringup
    - Stepped through the rest of the states one at a time, no locklosses
00:28 NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE
00:29 Observing

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (ISC, PSL)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:57, Tuesday 28 October 2025 - last comment - 15:59, Wednesday 29 October 2025(87803)
ISS array S1202965 was put in storage (Rahul, Keita)

Related: https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=87729

We disconnected everything from the ISS array installation spare unit S1202965 and stored it in the ISS array cabinet in the vac prep area next to the OSB optics lab. See the first 8 pictures.

The  incomplete spare ISS array assy originally removed from LLO HAM2 (S1202966) was moved to a shelf under the work table right next to the clean loom in the optics lab (see the 9th picture). Note that one PD was pulled from that and was transplanted to our installation spare S1202965.

Metadata for both 2965 and 2966 were updated.

ISS second array parts inventory https://dcc.ligo.org/E2500191 is being updated.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 15:59, Wednesday 29 October 2025 (87835)

Rahul and I cleared the optics table so Josh and Jeff can do their SPI work.

Optics mounts and things were put in the blue cabinet. Mirrors, PBS and lenses were put back into labeled containers and in the cabinet in front of the door to the change area.

Butterfly module laser, the LD driver and TEC controller were put back in the gray plastic bin. There was no space in the cabinets/shelves so it's put under the optics table closer to the flow bench area.

Single channel PZT drivers were put back in the cabinet on the northwest wall in the optics lab. Two channel PZT driver, oscilloscopes, a function generator and DC supplies went back to the EE shop.

OnTrack QPD preamp, its dedicated power transformer, LIGO's LCD interface for QPD and its power supply were put in a corner of one of the bottom shelf of the cabinet on the southwest wall.

Thorlabs M2 profiler and a special lens kit for that were given to Tony who stored them in the Pcal lab.

aLIGO PSL ISS PD array spare parts inventory E2500191 was updated.

H1 SUS (SUS)
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:39, Tuesday 21 October 2025 - last comment - 21:26, Tuesday 28 October 2025(87620)
Sat Amps Modified: Lower Stages MC1, MC2, MC3, PR3, and SR3

WP 12844
ECR E2400330
Modified List T2500232

The following SUS SAT Amps were upgraded per ECR E2400330. Modification improves the whitening stage to reduce ADC noise from 0.05 to 10 Hz.

Suspension Old New OSEM
MC1 M2 S1100182 S1100148 ULLLURLR
MC1 M3 S1100176 S1100135 ULLLURLR
MC3 M2 S1100069 S1100106 ULLLURLR
MC3 M3 S1100123 S1100093 ULLLURLR
PR3 M2 S1100063 S1000274 ULLLURLR
PR3 M3 S1100113 S1000277 ULLLURLR
MC2 M2 S1100110 S1100169 ULLLURLR
MC2 M3 S1000294 S1100174 ULLLURLR
SR3 M2 S1100105 S1100146 ULLLURLR
SR3 M3 S1100074 S1100134 ULLLURLR

F. Clara, J. Kissel, O. Patane

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:19, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87816)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100148, assigned to MC1 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100148_MC1_M2_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
MC1 M2 S1100148 CH1 UL 0.0949:5.19 120.3 zpk([5.19],[0.0949],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0961:5.24 120.5 zpk([5.24],[0.0961],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0962:5.25 120.5 zpk([5.25],[0.0962],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0967:5.27 120.375 zpk([5.27],[0.0967],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100148_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:21, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87817)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100135, assigned to MC1 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100135_MC1_M3_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
MC1 M3 S1100135 CH1 UL 0.0955:5.21 120.25 zpk([5.21],[0.0955],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0962:5.25 120.25 zpk([5.25],[0.0962],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0973:5.31 120.125 zpk([5.31],[0.0973],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.097:5.3 120.125 zpk([5.3],[0.097],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100135_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:21, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87818)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100106, assigned to MC3 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100106_MC3_M2_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
MC3 M2 S1100106 CH1 UL 0.0978:5.34 120.25 zpk([5.34],[0.0978],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.096:5.24 120.5 zpk([5.24],[0.096],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0973:5.32 120.125 zpk([5.32],[0.0973],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0955:5.21 120.5 zpk([5.21],[0.0955],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100106_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:22, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87819)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100093, assigned to MC3 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100093_MC3_M3_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
MC3 M3 S1100093 CH1 UL 0.0966:5.28 120.0 zpk([5.28],[0.0966],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.099:5.4 120.375 zpk([5.4],[0.099],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0969:5.3 120.0 zpk([5.3],[0.0969],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0966:5.28 120.125 zpk([5.28],[0.0966],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100093_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:23, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87820)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1000274, assigned to PR3 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1000274_PR3_M2_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
PR3 M2 S1000274 CH1 UL 0.0947:5.17 120.25 zpk([5.17],[0.0947],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0961:5.24 120.25 zpk([5.24],[0.0961],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0963:5.26 120.0 zpk([5.26],[0.0963],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0962:5.25 120.25 zpk([5.25],[0.0962],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1000274_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:24, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87821)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1000277, assigned to PR3 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1000277_PR3_M3_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
PR3 M3 S1000277 CH1 UL 0.0962:5.26 120.0 zpk([5.26],[0.0962],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0948:5.17 120.5 zpk([5.17],[0.0948],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0941:5.12 120.5 zpk([5.12],[0.0941],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0958:5.23 120.25 zpk([5.23],[0.0958],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1000277_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:24, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87822)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100169, assigned to MC2 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100169_MC2_M2_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
MC2 M2 S1100169 CH1 UL 0.0976:5.34 120.25 zpk([5.34],[0.0976],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0964:5.26 120.25 zpk([5.26],[0.0964],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0955:5.21 120.25 zpk([5.21],[0.0955],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0973:5.31 120.2 zpk([5.31],[0.0973],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100169_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:25, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87823)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100174, assigned to MC2 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100174_MC2_M3_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
MC2 M3 S1100174 CH1 UL 0.0993:5.43 120 zpk([5.43],[0.0993],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0969:5.3 120 zpk([5.3],[0.0969],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0951:5.2 120 zpk([5.2],[0.0951],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0952:5.2 120 zpk([5.2],[0.0952],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100174_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:25, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87824)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100146, assigned to SR3 M2's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100146_SR3_M2_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
SR3 M2 S1100146 CH1 UL 0.0968:5.29 120.0 zpk([5.29],[0.0968],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0989:5.4 120.0 zpk([5.4],[0.0989],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0948:5.18 120.0 zpk([5.18],[0.0948],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0966:5.27 120.25 zpk([5.27],[0.0966],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100146_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 21:26, Tuesday 28 October 2025 (87825)

Here's the characterization data and fit results for S1100134, assigned to SR3 M3's ULLLURLR OSEMs.

This sat amp is a UK 4CH sat amp, D0900900 / D0901284. The data was taken per methods described in T080062-v3, using the diagrammatic setup shown on PAGE 1 of the Measurement Diagrams from LHO:86807.

The data was processed and fit using ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Scripts/
plotresponse_S1100134_SR3_M3_ULLLURLR_20251020.m

Explicitly, the fit to the whitening stage zero and pole, the transimpedance feedback resistor, and foton design string are:

Optic  Stage  Serial_Number  Channel_Number  OSEM_Name  Zero_Pole_Hz  R_TIA_kOhm  Foton_Design 
SR3 M3 S1100134 CH1 UL 0.0975:5.32 120.0 zpk([5.32],[0.0975],1,"n")
      CH2 LL 0.0958:5.23 120.0 zpk([5.23],[0.0958],1,"n")
      CH3 UR 0.0958:5.22 120.375 zpk([5.22],[0.0958],1,"n")
      CH4 LR 0.0985:5.38 120.25 zpk([5.38],[0.0985],1,"n")

The attached plot and machine readable .txt file version of the above table are also found in ${SusSVN}/trunk/electronicstesting/lho_electronics_testing/satamp/ECR_E2400330/Results/
2025-10-20_UKSatAmp_S1100134_D0901284-v5_fitresults.txt

Per usual, R_TIA_kOhm is not used in the compensation filter -- but after ruling out an adjustment in the zero frequency (by zeroing the phase residual at the lowest few frequency points), Jeff nudged the transimpedance a bit to get the magnitude scale within the ~0.25%, shown in the attached results. Any scaling like this will be accounted for instead with the absolute calibration step, i.e. Side Quest 4 from G2501621, a la what was done for PR3 and SR3 top masses in LHO:86222 and LHO:84531 respectively.

Non-image files attached to this comment
Displaying reports 1-20 of 85335.Go to page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 End