TITLE: 07/27 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 155Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 15mph Gusts, 8mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.05 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
H1 has been locked 3.5+hrs. Environmetnally, pretty quiet after the big afternoon EQ; winds are dropping, µSeism is low (touching the bottom of the screen!).
There is a question of To Run Or Not Run a calibration. H1 is now thermalized (and a recent Short GRB standdown time Ibrahim had has expired). Reached out to LLO, but I'm guessing they are on Autopilot for the night. Ibrahim through out the idea of a calibration, and I think we'll just keep an eye on L1---if they lose lock, will run one. (Or we can wait to coordinate a Calibration tomorrow.)
TITLE: 07/26 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING 19:53 UTC (4 hr lock!)
IFO was very well behaved (2 days in a row!). Fully auto locks. Lost lock once due to a 6.6 EQ but managed to recover NLN within 2.5 hours. Lockloss alog 85997.
LOG:
None
Earthquake cause Lockloss ending 20hr 45 minute lock. It was a 6.6 EQ from NZ.
TITLE: 07/25 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY:
H1 was locked the entire shift even with the winds which topped around 35mph. H1's been locked just over 8.25hrs.
LOG:
Sat Jul 26 10:10:12 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 8secs
TITLE: 07/26 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 10mph Gusts, 5mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.04 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING since Jul 25 20:44 UTC (18 hr lock!)
IFO is still locked from yesterday, with consistent range.
As part of the DQ shift, I was looking at the DARM spectrorams to identify non-stationary (of the order of hours) features. Below is a list of features that were relatively obvious from the spectrograms. I used GDS-CALIB_STRAIN_NOLINES channel data for July, 21, 2025. In order to see the frequency variations a bit clear, i used 100-second spectrograms.
To identiy possible sources for the features listed in the above alog, I have produced spectrograms of some of the important auxiallary and environmental channels. I used the same fft parameters as the GDS plots and also restricted to same frequency regions as that of GDS plots above. All these plots available at link.
Both BRS x & y are within their nominal regions and mostly flat over the last couple months. CLOSING FAMIS 26457.
TITLE: 07/25 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 12mph Gusts, 5mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.05 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Very easy and nice transition hand-off from Ibrahim. H1 has been locked quite a bit since the big EQ 25hrs ago. (The forecasts note winds picking up from 6-10pm locally, so we'll be watching for that!)
TITLE: 07/25 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 154Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 20:44 UTC (2 hr 50 min lock)
H1 has been very well behaved and required 0 operator intervention (other than the standard TLC).
One Lockloss (Lockloss alog 85989)
LOG:
None
For FAMIS #26410: There is a notable step in most channels, but this corresponds to Tues Maintenance (922amPDT), but other than that, all trends are atleast flat FWIW.
Unknown cause lockloss. Lockloss tool flags the wind but given gusts are generally under 20mph, this is unlikely. IFO is at MOVE_SPOTS now after doing an initial alignment. Everything automatic so far.
..
Using my model for the propagation from OM2 to the OMC I discussed in alog #84255, I made a contour plot for the mode overlap (O(q1,q2 ))c between the mode propagated through cold OM2 to the OMC, q1 and the fundamental mode of the OMC, q2 divided by the mode propagated through hot OM2 overlapped with the OMC mode, (O(q1,q2 ))h .
This is so I could comnpare it to measurements I made of the drop in optical gain, G when the curvature of OM2 was changed. Its hard to predict how much loss in total there is with the full interferomter locked but the optical gain change can tell us the change in optical loss between these two states which we assume to be due to mode-mis-match.
O' / O = (G' / G)2
In the plot I have used overlap ratio percentage, O % on the z axis, the real part of of the q I started with between OM1 and OM2 on the x-axis, and the imaginary part of this q on the y-axis.
O % = (O(q1,q2 ))h / (O(q1,q2 ))c × 100
The white line gives the square ratio of the optical gains measured in full-lock (alog #82559) for each of these states. The code to run this is in OM2_to_OMC_comp_full_IFO.m found at this respository on ligo gitlab.
The white line contains a contour of possible values of the q parameter between OM1 and OM2 for the full-locked state of the interferometer bar any changes since the end of January 2025 when I took these measurements.
The limit on mode-matching to the OMC with OM2 hot is 96.2% of the mode-matching to the OMC with OM2 cold. This means in full-lock our mode-matching should be better with a cold OM2.
The q value before OM2 should lie somewhere on this white curve in full-lock but we don't have any direct mode measurements with the interferometer in full-lock to constrain this yet.
Fri Jul 25 10:09:47 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 9min 43secs
TITLE: 07/25 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 4mph Gusts, 2mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.06 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 10:38 UTC (4 hr lock)
H1 survived 2 strong earthquakes (5.7 and 6.2) near NZ.
TITLE: 07/25 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 151Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY: We had an early evening full of Earthquakes, a lockloss from an ETMX glitch then a double candidate detection at the end of the shift.
LOG:
| Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21:06 | SAF | LVEA IS LASER HAZARD | LVEA | Y | LVEA IS LASER HAZARD | 22:03 |
| 23:50 | EE | Fil, Jackie | EndX | N | SAT amp box swap | 00:17 |
02:18 UTC lockloss after only 27 minutes, looks like an ETMX glitch.
03:24 UTC Observing
M. Todd, E. Capote, C. Compton, S. Dwyer
After the vent, beam profiles were taken at REFL and POP (single-bounce) which are of interest to modeling efforts to gain some confidence in model parameters. Using a-la-mode to model the beam throughout the IFO and compare it to the measurements, we are able to confirm most of the parameters in the finesse yamlfile for the IFO model. See Figure 1 and Figure 2 for measured profiles of REFL and POP compared to the model beam parameters.
Now that we have more confidence in the model, we feel more comfortable looking at figures of merit that the model can provide -- such as the beam overlaps of different modes. Of particular interest was the input beam overlap with the PRC and ARM eigenmodes -- it seems the input beam is not super well mode-matched the PRC.
| Mode1 | Mode2 | Overlap: v, h [%] |
|---|---|---|
| Input beam [IMC] | PRCx | 94.98 , 97.00 |
| Input beam [IMC] | PRCy | 96.99 , 98.32 |
| Input beam [IMC] | ARMx | 98.57 , 98.91 |
| Input beam [IMC] | ARMy | 99.03 , 99.31 |
| PRCx | ARMx | 96.71 , 98.11 |
| PRCy | ARMy | 97.96 , 98.87 |
There are plenty of interesting figures of merit that we can calculate using this model that help us understand more about the mode-matching state of our interferometer, and hopefully inform steps to correct mismatch.
The code used in this modeling is held in the 'ligo-commissioning-modeling' repo folder:
Back to OBSERVING at 19:53 UTC