J. Kissel, F. Clara ECR E2400330 Fil modified another UK SatAmp (D0900900 / D0901284) per ECR E2400330, which means "rev'ing" up the D0901284 circuit board inside from -v4 to -v5. However, this one, S1000278, seems to have more variability in components that were not changed between channels -- namely if I - fit the measured zero and pole frequency, and - assume that a perfect, as drawn, value for the R181 = R182 resistors (as Fil confirms that these were +/-0.1% resistors) the total capacitance seems to have a ~2% variability. Not unreasonable, given that typical off-the-shelf caps of value 10 [uF] have +/-10% variability, so with two of these caps parallel, you could expect the total capacitance to be between 18 and 22 [uF], or +/-10%. As such, I propose we set a tolerance for these transfer functions to have the following values at the following "check" frequencies (i.e. logspace(log10(5),log10(50),3), which is a requestable frequency vector on an SR785 frequency response sweep, if fstart = 50, and fstop = 0.5, with N points = 3). These assume values assume 1% variation in transimpedance amp feedback resistor, and 2.5% variation in whitening cap. Freq Mag (Upper Bound) Mag (Lower Bound) Phase (Upper Bound) Phase (Lower Bound) [Hz] [V/V] or dB([V/V]) [V/V] or dB([V/V]) [deg] [deg] 0.5 5.4098 or 14.664 5.0554 or 14.075 -106.23 -106.5 5.0 38.415 or 31.69 36.671 or 31.286 -135.09 -133.72 50. 54.987 or 34.805 53.868 or 34.627 -174.2 -173.9 Freq Mag Tolerance db(Mag Tolerance) Phase Tolerance [Hz] [V/V] +/- [V/V] dB([V/V]) +/- dB([V/V]) [deg] +/- [deg] 0.5 5.2313 +/- 0.17847 14.372 +/- 0.29138 -106.36 +/- 0.12754 5.0 37.547 +/- 0.86844 31.491 +/- 0.19861 -134.41 +/- 0.67952 50. 54.428 +/- 0.55902 34.716 +/- 0.088757 -174.05 +/- 0.14395 That being said, we wouldn't replace the non-ECR components if the SatAmp didn't pass this test, we'll just use those under-performing SatAmps to be used on low priority stages, i.e. ones not used for damping loop control, i.e. not top mass stages. If many end up exceeding this thresholds, then we can start to prioritize which suspensions get the best.
Fri Jun 27 10:12:24 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 12min 21secs
The filter cavity was having a hard time locking, and it looks like the FC green trans power has been dropping slowly over the last 3 weeks, which seems to be caused by a drop in the SHG power from around 100-110 mW down to 77 mW .
I adjusted the picos and the SHG temperature, and recovered the SHG power to 86 mW, so there is still a lot of missing power. The filter cavity locked after this.
I've added a template for this adjustment to userapps/sqz/h1/Templates/ndscope/SHG_alignment_temp_adjust.yaml
Jennie W, Ryan C, Sheila
Ryan and Jennie saw that the filter cavity had trouble locking again. We looked at the filter cavity transmission and launched power now compared to 10 days ago. The launched power has dropped to 71% of what it was (after my slight improvement this morning), and the transmitted power is 69% of what it was. This means that the main reason the filter cavity tranmission has decreased is the lower injected power (due to SHG power drop), not a filter cavity alignment problem.
The guardian has a checker that the filter cavity is locked in green when transmission is above 60uW, which we lowered to 50uW in the GR_LOCKED checker. With the lower transmission the power was sometimes dropping below 50uW, so this would help. We will see what happens with the SHG power over the next few days.
Lockloss at 17:02 UTC in NLN while we were waiting for the FC to lock.
TITLE: 06/27 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 9mph Gusts, 4mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.05 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
14:46 UTC DRMI is struggling when ASC starts, I'm going to run a manual_IA
At the time of the request for help 10:22 UTC, we were in in CHECK_AS_SHUTTER where it was presumably stuck at SHUTTER_FAIL which I've encountered again at 15:22 UTC. It's been in that state since 09:05 UTC when we lost lock from 25Ws and the SHUTTER GRD reported "No kick... peak GS13 signal = 51.226"
The shutter did not trigger in this last lockloss, it looks like the light heading to the AS port was not high enough to trigger the shutter.
The lockloss_shutter_check guardian check for a kick in the HAM6 GS 13s anytime that we loose lock with more than 25kW circulating power in the arms. In this case we had just reach 100kW circulating power, so the guardian expected the shutter to trigger. This lockloss looks unusual in that there isn't a increase in the power going to the AS port right before the lockloss.
Ryan ran the shutter test and the shutter is working correctly now.
I think that this is probably the result of an usual lockloss happening at somewhat lower circulating power than usual. We should probably edit the logic in IFO notify to call for operator assistance whenever the shutter is in the failed state.
This is OK, the AS port went dark and stayed there for about 70ms or so after the lockloss and there was no excessive power surge that would have caused the fast shutter to be triggered.
The maximum power of ~1.4W was observed ~160ms after the lockloss, which is well below the threshold for the analog FS trigger (3 to 4W, I don't remember the exact number).
If something similar happened with 60W, though, FS might have been triggered.
Attached is the estimate of the power coming into HAM6 using two different sensors (PEM-CS_ADC_5_19 = HAM6 power sensor in the AS camera can which monitors power before the fast shutter, and ASC-AS_A_DC_NSUM after). Neither of these have hardware whitening, neither saturated (ASA was close to saturation but the HAM6 power sensor saturation threshold is about 570W when beam diverter is open, 5.7k if closed).
Note that the calibration of the PEM channel is a factor of 10 smaller than that in the observation mode (0.177W/ct, see alog 81112 and git repo for lock loss tool) because the beam diverter (90:10) was open.
I made a timeline of what ISC_LOCK was doing during this event.
TITLE: 06/27 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 150Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 04:13 UTC
Quite the frustrating shift in which I encountered:
LOG:
None
We disabled SQZ ASC for the night (not FC ASC), to prevent it from running away again overnight until someone can check what happened.
It has been a difficult relock acquisition following our last lockloss due to a few reasons all related to the inability to lock DRMI:
1. Small local EQ showing up on both primary and secondary microseism.
2. ALSX PLL Crystal Beatnote insufficient for ALSX lock - this comes on and off and was happening largely in the first hour of lock aquisition. There were 9 locklosses at this state in IR, PRMI, DRMI and of course, LOCKING_ALS. I attempted to cycle through "enable/disable" for the ALSX FIBR LOCK on the ALSX PLL page, but this did not help. The issue seems to have largely went away on its own 45 minutes into trying.
3. DRMI/PRMI general alignment. The flashes are good, and I've seen DRMI lock in worse conditions. I touched the BS, PRM, PR2, SRM, SR2 in order to optimize the alignment further but this proved useless.
The first thing I did after the lockloss was to do a full initial alignment, since I heard that the PRMI ASC was fixed. Before my shift, we were having 45 minutes of issues locking DRMI but the initial alignment did not seem to fix this. After 2 hours of trying to touch suspensions, I have decided to do a step-through of initial alignment. I still allowed PRMI ASC to happen automatically (though will do manually if this lock attempt fails). This has just finished and I'm relocking now..
DRMI locked almost immediately after a second, manual initial alignment. Strange.
Lockloss from 522 (LOWNLOISE_ASC). Lost lock at LOWNOISE_ASC due to 2.9 South Oregon EQ. DRMI again is not locking despite touching suspensions, going through PRMI, MICH. Flashes are just fine..
Re-locking now and if this continues to fail for another 20 minutes, I will do yet another manual initial alignment, which is so far the only thing that seems to work.
TITLE: 06/27 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Currently relocking and stuck not being able to get past DRMI due to it not wanting to lock and some previous ALSX crystal frequency issues. Ibrahim is working on trying to fix that.
When we went back into Observing after Commissioning today at 21:20 UTC, we had accidentally left the beam diverters open, and didn't notice for 20 minutes, so between 21:20 and 21:41 UTC the beam diverter was open. Once we noticed, we went out of Observing, closed it, and then went back ito Observing. tagging detchar
LOG:
14:30 Observing and have been Locked for 7.5 hours
14:38 Lockloss
15:40 NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE
21:20 Observing after commissioning end
- We had accidentally left the beam diverter open so this data may not be very good
21:41 Out of Observing to close the beam diverter
21:44 Back into Observing with everything looking good
22:29 Lockloss
Just want to specify that the only beam diverter left open was the POP beam diverter! All other usually-closed beam diverters were closed.
WP12637 Install HWS Camera Controls
TJ, Camilla, Dave:
I made a slight change to my original Dec 2023 hws_camera_control.py code to use the python epics module to do the cagets directly, and to also use this to add caputs which will try, in a non-blocking way, to send the camera's status to a central EPICS IOC.
The central IOC code is hws_camera_status_ioc.py which runs on cdsioc1 under puppet control.
The camera control code runs every minute in an infinite loop. Each loop it checks the status of H1 using Guardian ISC_LOCK (greater or equal to 600 denotes H1 LOCK). If H1 is locked and the camera is on, it turns the camera off. If H1 is not locked and the camera is off, it turns the camera on.
A mini-overview of the 4 HWS cameras (ITMX, ITMY, ETMX, ETMY) is available on the CDS Overview screen. The block is divided into 4 segments, each camera is shown either in SKYBLUE (camera is enabled, images are being taken) or GREEN (camera is disabled, no noise being created).
Note that the color scheme relates to what is nominal for OBSERVE. Green indicates the cameras have power, but their frame acquisition has been disabled.
Clicking on the HWS block on the CDS Overview opens a detailed screen (see attachment). For each camera this shows if the camera is powered (ETMY is the only one powered down) and if the camera is enabled. The control code also reports its current time, its uptime, its start time and details of where and how it is running.
Second attachment shows the four tmux sessions running the control code, and the arguments used.
Signal railed about 5:18 PM local time, I checked trend data for PT120 and PT180 and no pressure rise noted inside the main volume. Attached is 3 day trend of the pump behavior, very glitchy for a long while already.
System will be evaluated as soon as possible. AIP last replaced on 2015, see aLOG 18261.
Well, it appears as if the pump still has some life, just a few minutes ago started to pump the annulus system, for now.
(Jordan V., Gerardo M.)
Late entry, activity took place last Tuesday 07/22/2025.
The annulus ion pump signal railed again, so this time we decided to replace the controller. It does not seem like the controller improved the ion pump behavior, since the current signal is swinging more than before, see attached plot. We are keeping an eye on this system.
WP12623 h1asc add fast channels to DAQ
Elenna, Dave:
A new h1asc model was rev-locked and installed. Four new fast DQ channels were added to the DAQ (channel, rate):
> H1:ASC-DC6_P_IN1_DQ, 256
> H1:ASC-DC6_P_OUT_DQ, 512
> H1:ASC-DC6_Y_IN1_DQ, 256
> H1:ASC-DC6_Y_OUT_DQ, 512
DAQ restart needed.
WP12570 Restart Digivideo Cameras with latest pylon
Patrick, Jonathan, Dave:
Jonathan updated pylon on h1digivideo[4,5,6] and restarted all the camera servers on these machines. This should fix the bug of stuck open files accumulating when the camera connection is interrupted.
No DAQ restart needed.
Add PID SMOO channels to vacuum SDF
Dave:
Prior to today's h0vacly restart I added the missing CP PID-control SMOO channels to the vacuum SDF monitor.req and safe.snap files. SDF was restarted 08:29. No DAQ restart needed.
WP12577, 12608, 12615 Upgrade LY Vacuum Controls
Janos, Gerardo, Patrick, Jonathan, Erik, Dave:
Patrick installed a new h0vacly system this morning. Main items are:
Pleae see Patrick's alog for details.
A extended DAQ restart was required, renaming Ion Pump raw minute trend files for uninterrupted lookback and construcing new PT100 (HAM1) raw minute trends following the upgrade of h0vaclx last Tuesday (17th June 2025).
DAQ Restart
Jonathan, Erik, Patrick, Dave:
Immediately following the restart of h1asc at 11:52, the DAQ was restarted using the following procedure:
It was at this late point that I remembered that the temporary H1 version of PT100B is no longer needed, and indeed this channel has no data following the removal of the PT100B Volts channel from h0vacly. However since it is still in the EDC, we need to continue running the temporary IOC until the next DAQ restart. I've removed it from edcumaster.txt as a reminder.
GPS Leap Seconds Updates
Jonathan, Erik, Dave:
Erik's FAMIS task reminded us that the leapseonds files expiration date of 30 June 2025 is rapidly approaching. Although no leap seconds are to be applied, the files need to be updated to reset their expiration dates. Please see Erik and Jonathan's alog for more details.
DNS testing
Erik:
ns1 (backup DNS server) was used by Erik to see if we can reproduce the error whereby loss of connection to GC caused internal CDS name resolution issues. It did not.
Vacuum Ion Pump channel name changes (old-name, new-name)
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_II123_AIP_IC_VOLTS | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_IIC9_AIP_IC_VOLTS |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_II123_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_IIC9_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_II123_AIP_IC_MA | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_IIC9_AIP_IC_MA |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_II123_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_IIC9_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_II123_AIP_IC_LOGMA | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_IIC9_AIP_IC_LOGMA |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_II123_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_IIC9_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_VI123_AIP_PRESS_TORR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_VIC9_AIP_PRESS_TORR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP23_VI123_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCC9_VIC9_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_II124_AIP_IC_VOLTS | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_IID1_AIP_IC_VOLTS |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_II124_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_IID1_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_II124_AIP_IC_MA | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_IID1_AIP_IC_MA |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_II124_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_IID1_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_II124_AIP_IC_LOGMA | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_IID1_AIP_IC_LOGMA |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_II124_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_IID1_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_VI124_AIP_PRESS_TORR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_VID1_AIP_PRESS_TORR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP24_VI124_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCD1_VID1_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP25_CS187_STATUS | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCH8A_CSH8A_STATUS |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP25_II187_IC_VOLTS | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCH8A_IIH8A_IC_VOLTS |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP25_II187_IC_VOLTS_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCH8A_IIH8A_IC_VOLTS_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP25_II187_IC_AMPS | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCH8A_IIH8A_IC_AMPS |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP25_II187_IC_AMPS_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCH8A_IIH8A_IC_AMPS_ERROR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP25_VI187_PRESS_TORR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCH8A_VIH8A_PRESS_TORR |
| H0:VAC-FCES_IP25_VI187_PRESS_TORR_ERROR | H0:VAC-FCES_IPFCH8A_VIH8A_PRESS_TORR_ERROR |
Tue24Jun2025
LOC TIME HOSTNAME MODEL/REBOOT
11:52:26 h1asc0 h1asc <<< Elenna's new asc model
not shown, shutdown of both TW0 and TW1 for file manipulation at this point
12:17:51 h1daqdc0 [DAQ] <<< 0-leg restart
12:18:03 h1daqfw0 [DAQ]
12:18:03 h1daqtw0 [DAQ]
12:18:05 h1daqnds0 [DAQ]
12:18:12 h1daqgds0 [DAQ]
12:18:15 h1susauxb123 h1edc[DAQ] <<< edc restart with new vacuum channel list
12:24:09 h1daqdc1 [DAQ] << 1-leg restart
12:24:22 h1daqfw1 [DAQ]
12:24:22 h1daqtw1 [DAQ]
12:24:23 h1daqnds1 [DAQ]
12:24:31 h1daqgds1 [DAQ]
12:25:06 h1daqgds1 [DAQ] <<< gds1 second restart