Displaying reports 2681-2700 of 83150.Go to page Start 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 End
Reports until 10:56, Monday 17 February 2025
H1 SQZ
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:56, Monday 17 February 2025 - last comment - 08:55, Tuesday 18 February 2025(82853)
Trouble with SQZ FC this AM.

Ryan S, Camilla

Corey 82849, Ryan and I have had some issues with SQZ this morning. Corey adjusted the SHG temp to get enough green power to lock the OPO but after that the SQZ and range was bad. FR3 signal and FC WFS were very noisy.

Ryan tried to take SQZ out, checked OPO temp (fine), reset the SQZ angle from 220deg back to a more sensible 190deg and then put SQZ back in again but he couldn't get the FC to lock. Followed steps in the SQZ wiki to touch up FC1/2 alignment and got  H1:SQZ-FC_TRANS_C_LF_OUTPUT to >120, plot. but we still were loosing the FC at TRANSION_TO_IR_LOCKING. THE FC also seemed unstable when locked on green. While we were troubleshooting, the IFO lost lost. Unsure if this is an ASC issue, FC_ASC trends attached (POS for Y and P were moving much more than usual), SQZ ASC trends (ZM4 PIT changes alot).

After the lock loss, the SQZ_FC seemed to lock stably in green with H1:SQZ-FC_TRANS_C_LF_OUTPUT = 160. Plot. This is higher than usual and it's not clear what changed!

Ryan mentioned that something happened to Oli at the weekend where the range was bad but SQZ unlocked and re-locked and it came back good, plot, but this seemed to the the OPO PZT changing to a better place (we know it likes ot be ~90 rather than 50s).

After relocking, everything was fine but the FC ASC wasn't turning on as the threshold was too low, 2.5. Ryan decreased H1:SQZ-FC_ASC_TRIGGER_THRESH_ON from 3.0 to 2.0, this has been slowly decreasing, maybe as we decreased the OPO trans from 80uW to 60uW last week. Plot. Ryan accepted in sdf and then checked SQZ_MANAGER, SQZ_FC, sqzparams to check this isn't set in GRD.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 11:16, Monday 17 February 2025 (82854)

FC ASC lower trigger threshold accepted in SDF. It is not set anywhere by Guardian nor is this model's SAFE.snap table pushed during SDF_REVERT.

Images attached to this comment
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 12:59, Monday 17 February 2025 (82855)SQZ

After a while, Camilla and I again dropped H1 out of observing as even after thermalization, BNS range and squeezing weren't looking good. We decided to reset the SQZ ASC and angle in case they were set at a bad reference point. I took SQZ_MANAGER to 'RESET_SQZ_ASC_FDS' and adjusted the SQZ angle to optimize DARM and SQZ BLRMS. To reset the angle servo here, I adjusted SQZ-ADF_OMC_TRANS_PHASE to make SQZ-ADF_OMC_TRANS_SQZ_ANG oscillate around 0 (ended with a total change of -10deg), then requested SQZ_MANAGER back to 'FREQ_DEP_SQZ' to turn servos back on, and finally accepted on SDF (attached) to return to observing. It's been about 20 minutes since then, and so far H1 is observing with a much better steady range at around 160Mpc.

What happened that needed the ADF servo setpoint to be updated with a different SQZ angle? Investigation is ongoing.

Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 08:55, Tuesday 18 February 2025 (82874)

Attaching the plot from after Corey got the SQZ locked and it was bad, you can see it looks like one of the loops was oscillating, plot attached. Compare to normal SQZ plot.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:20, Monday 17 February 2025 (82852)
Mon CP1 Fill

Mon Feb 17 10:13:43 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 13min 40secs

TCmins [-49, -48C] OAT (+2C, 36F) DeltaTempTime 10:13:43

Images attached to this report
LHO General
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:04, Monday 17 February 2025 (82851)
Ops Day Shift Start

TITLE: 02/17 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 130Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: USEISM
    Wind: 2mph Gusts, 0mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.64 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked for just over an hour but only observing for about half that as SQZ was having issues locking (see Corey's alog).

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:47, Monday 17 February 2025 - last comment - 07:58, Monday 17 February 2025(82849)
H1 Wake Up Call Due to SQZ OPO LR node (SHG TEC Set Temperature needed to be lowered)

1452utc (652ampdt):  Wake up call due to No Squeezing.

SQZ Symptoms & Solution:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 07:58, Monday 17 February 2025 (82850)

It's been about 20min since we went back to Squeezing, but it appears the adjusting of the SHG TEC Setpoint Temperature made squeezing possible, but now the range did not improve at all.  Left a note for the Day Shift in mattermost.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:09, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82848)
Ops Eve Shift End

TITLE: 02/17 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: Currently relocking and in ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC. After we lost lock right at the end of Ryan's shift, we were able to get back up relatively easily after I ran an initial alignment. We got knocked out by an earthquake though, and we just finished running another initial alignment. The only difficulty in getting relocked for me has been ALSX and Y - they've still been liking to drop out every once in a while, even right after an initial alignment.

After trying and failing to improve squeezing earlier today (two locks ago) with Ryan, squeezing (and subsequently range) also wasn't great when we got relocked this last lock. However, an hour in, we dropped out due to the SQZ filter cavity unlocking, and when it relocked, squeezing was back to being around -4db. Not sure what was changed there, but it got us back to around 155Mpc, which was very appreciated, even if it's not an amazing range.
LOG:

00:49 Lockloss
    - Started an initial alignment since ALS flashes didnt look good and I knew there would be issues with ALSY dropping out
02:08 NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE
02:11 Observing
    02:57 Out of Observing due to SQZ FC unlocking
03:01 Back into Observing

05:16 Lockloss
    - Ran an IA

H1 General (ISC, Lockloss)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:50, Sunday 16 February 2025 - last comment - 20:22, Monday 17 February 2025(82847)
Small set of strange locklosses over the weekend

I was looking at the lockloss sheet and noticed that this weekend, there were three locklosses that were similar to each other. Ryan Short noted one in an alog a couple days ago: 82809.

The locklosses look similar to what we sometimes see when we lose lock due to ground motion from an earthquake or wind, but in all three cases there was no earthquake motion, and the wind was below 20mph. There will be an 11 Hz oscillation starting about 1 second before the lockloss, and it can be seen in DARM, all QUADs, MICH, PRCL, and SRCL.

Lockloss times:

2025-02-14 07:15 UTC

2025-02-14 21:15 UTC

2025-02-16 09:48 UTC

There was another instance of a lockloss that looked just like these on February 7th 2025 at 05:47UTC as well.

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 18:38, Monday 17 February 2025 (82863)

Some more of these weird locklosses from the last day:

2025-02-17 12:53 UTC

2025-02-17 17:04 UTC (82856)

2025-02-18 00:06 UTC (82860)

oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 20:22, Monday 17 February 2025 (82866)
H1 General (Lockloss)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:19, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82846)
Lockloss

Lockloss @ 02/17 05:16 UTC  after 3 hours locked due to an earthquake. Earthquake didn't shake the ground too hard, but we still lost lock becuase secondary microseism is also really high.

LHO General (SQZ)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:05, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82840)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 02/17 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY: H1 has been locked for 3 hours. As I'm posting this, H1 is unlocked and running an alignment. One lockloss this morning, then much of the shift was spent attempting to relock H1 with several failed attempts. After relocking, we noticed the range was noticeably lower than recent locks and that DARM in higher frequencies looked poor, pointing to SQZ not being optimized.

SQZ Troubleshooting: I started by just trying to take SQZ_MANAGER to 'DOWN' then back up to 'FREQ_DEP_SQZ' to see if that would fix the range issue, but the FC ASC was not turning on after the FC locked. The SQZ-FC_ASC_TRIGGER_INMON was not reaching its threshold of 3 to turn ASC on, so I thought improving FC alignment by adjusting FC2 might help. Ultimately, after following the FC alignment instructions from the SQZ troubleshooting wiki, the FC would not lock at all in IR, so I reverted my FC2 move and then attempted to adjust the OPO temperature. Again following the instructions on the wiki, with SQZ_MANAGER in 'LOCK_CF,' I was able to improve SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_ABS_OUPUT and the FC was able to lock successfully with ASC on. After then taking SQZ_MANAGER all the way up to 'FREQ_DEP_SQZ,' I again adjusted the OPO temperature (in the other direction) as both the inspiral range and SQZ BLRMS looked worse than when we had started. I was able to bring these back to about where they were when I dropped observing, so ultimately this adventure didn't provide much improvement. H1 then returned to observing.

 LOG:

H1 General (Lockloss)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:53, Sunday 16 February 2025 - last comment - 18:15, Sunday 16 February 2025(82842)
Lockloss

Lockloss @ 02/17 00:49 UTC after over 3 hours locked

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 18:15, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82843)

02:11 Back to Observing

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:45, Sunday 16 February 2025 - last comment - 18:52, Sunday 16 February 2025(82839)
Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 02/17 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 140 Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: USEISM
    Wind: 9mph Gusts, 5mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.53 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Currently Observing and have been Locked for 3 hours. Our range was bad, which we figured was due to squeezing being way worse than last lock and not getting better with thermalization. We popped out of Observing to adjust squeezing but it was giving us issues and we had trouble getting IR to lock (see Ryan's alog). Finally were able to get the filter cavity locked by adjusting the OPO temp, but our squeezing was still bad, so Ryan adjusted the OPO temperature again and got a tiny bit of squeezing out (-1db), but not much. Range is basically back to where it was before all this.

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 18:52, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82845)

Ryan's alog: 82840

H1 General (Lockloss)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:24, Sunday 16 February 2025 - last comment - 13:36, Sunday 16 February 2025(82837)
Lockloss @ 17:03 UTC

Lockloss @ 17:03 UTC - link to lockloss tool

ETMX glitch lockloss, no other obvious cause.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 13:36, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82838)

H1 back to observing at 21:35 UTC. Long but pretty much automatic relock due to two locklosses at TRANSITION_FROM_ETMX and many more around ALS and DRMI, possibly because of the high microseism.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:21, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82836)
Sun CP1 Fill

Sun Feb 16 10:11:43 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 40secs

TCmins [-54C, -53C] OAT (+1C, 34F) DeltaTempTime 10:11:46

Images attached to this report
H1 General (Lockloss)
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:41, Friday 14 February 2025 - last comment - 18:51, Sunday 16 February 2025(82809)
Lockloss @ 21:15 UTC

Lockloss @ 21:15 UTC - link to lockloss tool

The lockloss tool tags this as WINDY (although wind speeds were only up to around 20mph) and there seems to be an 11Hz oscillation that starts about a second before the lockloss seen by all quads, PRCL, MICH, SRCL, and DARM.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 15:42, Friday 14 February 2025 (82815)ISC

H1 back to observing at 23:11 UTC. Fully automatic relock after I started an initial alignment soon after the last lockloss.

After H1 reached NLN, I ran the A2L script (unthermalized) for both P & Y on all quads. Results here:

  Initial Final Diff
ETMX P 3.35 3.6 0.25
ETMX Y 4.94 4.92 -0.02
ETMY P 5.48 5.64 0.16
ETMY Y 1.29 1.35 0.06
ITMX P -0.67 -0.64 0.03
ITMX Y 2.97 3.0 0.03
ITMY P -0.06 -0.03 0.03
ITMY Y -2.51 -2.53 -0.02

New A2L gains were updated in lscparams and ISC_LOCK was loaded. I also REVERTED all outstanding SDF diffs from running the script (time-ramps on quads and ADS matrix changes in ASC). The A2L gains themselves are not monitored.

Images attached to this comment
ryan.short@LIGO.ORG - 16:19, Friday 14 February 2025 (82817)

Ran coherence check for a time right after returning to observing to check to A2L gains (see attached). Sheila comments that this looks just a bit better than the last time this was run and checked on Feb 11th (alog82737).

Images attached to this comment
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 18:51, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82844)

Another lockloss that looks just like this one was seen 02/16 09:48UTC. Same 11 Hz oscillation 1 second before lockloss, seen in the same places.

H1 CDS (CDS)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 03:07, Friday 14 February 2025 - last comment - 09:06, Tuesday 18 February 2025(82799)
H1 Wake Up Due To: Due to BS Camera No Longer Updating & Taking CAMERA_SERVO Out Of Nominal

BS Camera stopped updating just like in alogs:

This takes the Camera Sevo guardian into a neverending loop (and takes ISC LOCK out of Nominal and H1 out of Observe).  See attached screenshot.

So, I had to wake up Dave so he could restart the computer & process for the BS Camera.  (Dave mentioned there is a new computer for this camera to be installed soon and it should help with this problem.)

As soon as Dave got the BS camera back, the CAMERA SERVO node got back to nominal, but I had accepted the SDF diffs for ASC which happened when this issue started, so I had to go back and ACCEPT the correct settings.  Then we automatically went back to Observing.

OK, back to trying to go back to sleep again!  LOL

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 14:58, Friday 14 February 2025 (82814)

Full procedure is:

Open BS (cam26) image viewer, verify it is a blue-screen (it was) and keep the viewer running

Verify we can ping h1cam26 (we could) and keep the ping running

ssh onto sw-lvea-aux from cdsmonitor using the command "network_automation shell sw-lvea-aux"

IOS commands: "enable", "configure terminal", "interface gigabitEthernet 0/35"

Power down h1cam26 with the "shutdown" IOS command, verify pings to h1cam26 stop (they did)

After about 10 seconds power the camera back up with the IOS command "no shutdown"

Wait for h1cam26 to start responding to pings (it did).

ssh onto h1digivideo2 as user root.

Delete the h1cam26 process (kill -9 <pid>), where pid given in file /tmp/H1-VID-CAM26_server.pid

Wait for monit to restart CAM26's process, verify image starts streaming on the viewer (it did).

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 16:48, Sunday 16 February 2025 (82841)

FRS:  https://services1.ligo-la.caltech.edu/FRS/show_bug.cgi?id=33320

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:06, Tuesday 18 February 2025 (82876)

Forgot once again to note timing for this wake-up.  This wake-up was at 233amPDT (1033utc), and I was roughly done with this work in about 45min after phoning Dave for help.

Displaying reports 2681-2700 of 83150.Go to page Start 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 End