We had just finished the calibration measurement 3 minutes earlier, 20:03 lockloss
Simulines start: The wind started picking up during the measurement.
PST: 2025-01-11 11:36:44.979063 PST
UTC: 2025-01-11 19:36:44.979063 UTC
GPS: 1420659422.979063
Simulines stop:
PST: 2025-01-11 12:00:27.281127 PST
UTC: 2025-01-11 20:00:27.281127 UTC
GPS: 1420660845.281127
Files:
2025-01-11 20:00:27,195 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250111T193645Z.hdf5
2025-01-11 20:00:27,203 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20250111T193645Z.hdf5
2025-01-11 20:00:27,208 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20250111T193645Z.hdf5
2025-01-11 20:00:27,213 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20250111T193645Z.hdf5
2025-01-11 20:00:27,218 | INFO | File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20250111T193645Z.hdf5
Closes FAMIS26346
Laser Status:
NPRO output power is 1.851W
AMP1 output power is 70.19W
AMP2 output power is 137.0W
NPRO watchdog is GREEN
AMP1 watchdog is GREEN
AMP2 watchdog is GREEN
PDWD watchdog is GREEN
PMC:
It has been locked 25 days, 0 hr 12 minutes
Reflected power = 25.46W
Transmitted power = 104.6W
PowerSum = 130.0W
FSS:
It has been locked for 0 days 15 hr and 6 min
TPD[V] = 0.8127V
ISS:
The diffracted power is around 2.5%
Last saturation event was 0 days 15 hours and 7 minutes ago
Possible Issues:
PMC reflected power is high
Sat Jan 11 10:18:17 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 18min 14secs
TCmins [-110C, -107C] OAT (10C, 50F)
TITLE: 01/11 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 155Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 5mph Gusts, 2mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.48 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
TITLE: 01/11 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 158Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 05:05 UTC
Overall calm shift with one slightly annoying LL during an opo temp optimization. The reacquisition was slow due to the environment (high winds and an earthquake) but was ultimately fully automatic after an initial alignment. Lockloss alog 82215
Other than this, the SQZ opo temp had to be adjusted so I went out of OBSERVING for 6 mins (5:05 UTC to 5:11 UTC) and adjusted it successfully bringing range from ~138 to ~158MPc (screenshot attached).
Otherwise, the microseism seems to be coming down slowly and high winds have calmed down.
LOG:
None
Unknown cause lockloss but reasonable to assume it was either microseism or squeeze related (though I'm unsure if SQZ can cause a LL like that).
The lockloss happened as I was adjusting the SQZ OPO temperature since in the last hour, there has been a steady decline in H1:SQZ-CLF_REFL_RF6_ABS_OUTPUT channel. After noticing this, I went out of OBSERVING and into CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE to fix. It was actually working (the channel signal was getting higher with each tap when the LL happened. This coincided with a 5.2 EQ in Ethiopia, which I do not think was the cause but may have moved things while in this high microseim state. I've attached the trends from SQZ overview and OPO temp including the improvements made. If it is possible to induce a LL changing the OPO temp, then this is likely what happened, though the LL did not happen when the temp was being adjusted, as the 3rd screenshot shows.
Seems that the microseism, the earthquake and SQZ issues also coincided with some 34mph gusts so I will conclude that it was mostly environmental.
Short update on locking: After very slow initial alignment, locking took some time to get through DRMI but managed after going to PRMI (and losing lock due to BS in between). We are now sitting at DARM_OFFSET but signals are not converged after 10 minutes due to a passing 5.0 from guatemala (that I beleive we will survive.
As Ibrahim said, the OPO temp adjustment would not cause a lockloss.
However we can see a this Friday time and two days before, the SQZ angle servo and ASC seem to get into a strange ~13minute oscillation when the OPO temperature is bad and the SQZ angle is around 220deg. See attached plots. We are not sure why this is. Now we are a week from the OPO crystal move 82134, the OPO temperature is becoming more stable but will still need adjusting for the next ~week.
TITLE: 01/11 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 156Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY:
IFO Has been locked for 9 hours.
It's been a perfect day for Observing.
Nothing to really report.
LOG:
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22:08 | OPS | LVEA | LVEA | N | LASER SAFE | 15:07 |
16:09 | FAC | Kim | Optics Lab | n | technical cleaning | 16:39 |
22:12 | VAC | Jordon & Janos | EX | No | Going to EX Mech room to check & get Vacuum Equipment | 22:43 |
23:37 | PCAL | Mr. Llamas | PCAL Lab | YES | Starting a PCAL lab measurement | 23:48 |
TITLE: 01/11 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 152Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: USEISM
Wind: 6mph Gusts, 2mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.48 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
IFO is in NLN and OBSERVING as of 15:24 UTC
Jennie W, Sheila,
On Wednesday Sheila and I compared the measurement of HAM 6 throughput taken in April 2024 where we stepped the DARM offset and then compared the power at the ASC port which is sensitive to DARM with the power on the DCPDs, with the HAM 6 efficiency for this light predicted by the known losses as obtained from the squeezer noise budget.
We found that combining both of these results in a prediction of unknown losses of 12.2% which sort of matches the 10.4% unknown losses predicted from squeezing measurements (alog # 82097).
HAM6 throughput measured in April 2024 from alog #79146.: 80.2%
HAM6 known losses: google sheet (1-0.00072)*(1-0.015)*(1-0.0096)*(1-0.044)*(1-0.02) = 91.3% expected HAM6 throughput
Unknown HAM6 losses based on this measurement = 1-0.802/0.913 = 12.2%
Yesterday I looked at Camilla and Elenna's DARM step measurement from 21st October 2024, and found the unknown loss is 10.2 % using the HAM6 throughput measured in October which matches the 10.4% unknown losses predicted from squeezing measurements (alog # 82097).
HAM6 throughput measured in October 2024 from alog #82204: 82 %
Unknown HAM6 losses based on this measurement: 1-0.82/0.913 = 10.2%
Fri Jan 10 10:10:06 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 3secs
Jordan confirmed a good fill curbside. TCmins [-92C, -90C] OAT (1C, 34F)
TITLE: 01/10 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 140Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Oli
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: USEISM
Wind: 9mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.62 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
H1just recently locked and Observing 7 minues before I walked in.
Everything looks like it is working well at first glance, except H1:PEM-CS_DUST_LAB2 still doesn't work.
TITLE: 01/10 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 159Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Oli
SHIFT SUMMARY: Very quiet shift with only one brief drop from observing. H1 has now been locked for 7 hours.
TITLE: 01/10 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 160Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan S
SHIFT SUMMARY: Calibration and commissioning time in the morning. One lock loss after that where I requested and initial alignment and it run that as well as main locking on its own. The squeezer issues this morning seem to be fixed. The useism is quite high, but we were able to relock.
LOG:
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22:08 | OPS | LVEA | LVEA | N | LASER SAFE | 15:07 |
16:54 | SQZ | Sheila, Camilla | LVEA | LOCAL | SQZ table work | 18:15 |
19:42 | PSL | Betsy, Rick, Rahul | Opt Lab | n | Location scouting | 20:42 |
21:51 | PCAL | Tony, Francisco | PCAL lab | local | Check on lab | 21:52 |
23:41 | VAC | Janos | EX | n | Mech room work | 01:41 |
TITLE: 01/10 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 160Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: USEISM
Wind: 6mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.06 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.70 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: H1 has been locked and observing for just over an hour.
ETM glitch tag, looks like there was some glitchy behavior from ETMX just before the lock loss.
useism is getting to the point that it might be tough to relock, we shall see.
I requested it to start with an initial alignment and then it completed that and main locking without intervention. Back to Observing at 2253UTC
Sheila, Camilla
After TJ found out OPO was struggling to get enough SHG pump power to lock 82196, Sheila repeated Daniel's 82057 SHG work as he had increased H1:SQZ-SHG_GR_DC_POWERMON from 95 to 125mW but now it's down to 92mW: Tried steering the beam with picos moves, and by adjusting the temperature it improved to 93mW only.
We went only SQZT0 and Sheila adjusted the alignment into the OPO pump fiber with the OPO unlocked, bringing the the OPO REFL DC power from 1.7 to 1.9mW. We also moved the SHG wave plate further to maximize the amount of light Now CLF could lock with controlmon around 5.8V. Much better and closer to the center of the range so should avoid this mornings 82196 issues.
Homdyne Work:
To take the below data, SEED power reduced back to 0.6mW, and then:
Type | NLG | SQZ dB @ 1kHz | Angle | DTT Ref | Notes |
Dark Noise | N/A | N/A | ref 0 | This and shot noise was noisy <300Hz at times when the OPO was locking or scanning, unsure why. | |
ASQZ | 11.2 | 14.2 | 241 | ref 2 | opo_grTrans_setpoint_uW = 80uW |
SQZ | 11.2 | -6.8 | 154 | ref 3 | reduced LO loop gain from 15 to -1 |
SQZ | 14.3 | -6.1 | 182 | ref 4 |
opo_grTrans_setpoint_uW = 120uW
reduced LO loop gain from -1 to -12
|
ASQZ | 14.3 | 17.8 | 216 | ref 5 | |
ASQZ | 16.0 | 19.1 | 210 | ref 6 | opo_grTrans_setpoint_uW = 140uW |
SQZ | 16.0 | 191 | ref 7 | ||
SQZ | 16.0 | -6.8 | 190 | ref 8 | increased LO loop gain from -12 to -1 as was looking peaky |
Shot Noise | N/A | N/A | ref 1 |
Blocked SEED, LO only.
|
We measured ~6.5dB of SQZ on the HD and up to 19dB of ASQZ. Plot attached.
Next time we work on the HD, we should measure the LO loop to know the correct gain to use.
SQZ data set
UTC | Type | CLF Phase | DTT ref |
19:02:00 - 19:08:00 | No SQZ | N/A | ref 0 |
19:14:00 - 19:20:00 (6mins) | FDS SQZ | 177deg | ref 1 |
19:21:00 - 19:25:00 (4mins) | FDS Mid + SQZ | 215deg | ref 2 |
19:26:00 - 19:30:00 (4mins) | FDS Mid - SQZ | 125deg | ref 3 |
19:32:00 - 19:36:00 (4mins) | FDS ASQZ | (-sign) 108deg | ref 4 |
19:40:00- 19:43:00 (3mins) | FIS ASQZ | (-sign) 108deg | ref 5 |
19:43:15- 19:45:15 (2mins) | FIS ASQZ +10deg | (-sign) 118deg | ref 6 |
19:45:30- 19:47:30 (2mins)
|
FIS ASQZ -10deg
|
(-sign) 98deg
|
ref 7
|
19:48:00 - 19:51:00 (3mins)
|
FIS SQZ
|
177deg
|
ref 8
|
19:51:30 - 19:54:30 (3mins)
|
FIS Mid + SQZ
(check, small low freq glitch at 19:53:49)
|
215deg
|
ref 9
|
19:55:00 - 19:58:00 (3mins)
|
FIS Mid - SQZ
|
125deg
|
ref 10
|
In 83022 we found that we had pump depletion during these measurements so that the OPO trs powers were actually lower than reported
I've imported Camilla's data from dtt, subtracted the dark noise. As Camilla notes above, the NLG measurements here don't nicely fit a model for a consistent threshold power. Instead of using the NLG data, I've allowed the threshold power to be one of the parameters that varies in the fit, along with total efficiency and phase noise. In principle one could also use this data to estimate the technical nosie that limits squeezing, but I haven't tried that with just a few points here.
The attached shows the NLG measurements vs what we would expect given the threshold power that the squeezing and anti-squeezing fits suggest. This model suggests that the total efficiency to of the homodyne squeezing is only only 81%, which seems too low.
This script is available here: quantumnoisebudgeting, but needs a lot of cleaning up.
All wrapped up, returned to Observing at 2002UTC.
22:35 UTC Observing