Displaying reports 35121-35140 of 89220.Go to page Start 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 End
Reports until 18:03, Sunday 22 March 2020
LHO General (AWC)
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:03, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55729)
Drove down x-arm 5:45p to 6p PST
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:57, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55721)
Shift Summary- Day

TITLE: 03/22 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 116Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Patrick
SHIFT SUMMARY: Locked 4h50. I'm leaving Patrick with still elevated mircosiesm and an incoming EQ.
LOG:

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:54, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55728)
Ops Eve Shift Start
TITLE: 03/22 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Camilla
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_CONF state: WINDY
    Wind: 13mph Gusts, 11mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.05 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.47 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: Incoming 6.0 magnitude earthquake from El Salvador.
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:39, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55726)
Mid-shift Summary

Got back to observing at 18:07 UTC. No issues.

H1 General (SEI)
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:53, Sunday 22 March 2020 - last comment - 10:38, Sunday 22 March 2020(55720)
H1 Lockloss 16:41:21 UTC

We were in EQ mode for a 4.8M EQ from Canda. The ground had mostly calmed down when we lost lock, but the high microseism may have contributed.

There is a microseism SEI_CONF state but I'm not sure how that works with the new automatic SEI_ENV. Tagging SEI  to ask what is currently the best state to be in when microseism is high? (Secondary useism: 0.38 μm/s)

Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 10:00, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55722)

This level microseism should not be a problem for the nominal configuration. It needs to be up around 1 micron/s to be an issue. If the microseism gets that high, we will have to do some work on the seismic automation, but we're unlikely to see that kind of ground motion this time of year.

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 10:12, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55723)

Great, thank you Jim. 

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 10:38, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55724)
DRMI is Locked. After 25 minutes verbal alarms asked me to find y-arm by hand. By this time INCREASE_FLASHES had already got flashes to 0.8 and WFS had grabbed. 
Had to intervene at FIND_IR. Should look at what has changed here as this seems to have happened a few times this week. Will add to Trello board. 
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:08, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55719)
Shift transition- Day shift

TITLE: 03/22 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_CONF state: WINDY
    Wind: 4mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.38 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked 35h20. Microseism has risen over the last 12 hours, currently just below our 90th percentile. 

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55718)
Ops Eve Shift Summary
TITLE: 03/21 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jim
SHIFT SUMMARY: Remained locked and in observing the entire shift. No issues.
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:07, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55717)
Ops Eve Mid Shift Status
Have remained locked and in observing. No issues.
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:56, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55711)
Shift Summary- Day

TITLE: 03/21 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Patrick
SHIFT SUMMARY: Locked 19h20. Dave Barker and Carlos Perez were on site this morning. 
LOG:

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:50, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55716)
Ops Eve Shift Start
TITLE: 03/21 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 116Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Camilla
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_CONF state: WINDY
    Wind: 7mph Gusts, 5mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.19 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: No issues.
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:09, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55714)
Mid-shift Summary

Locked 15h30. Microseism has risen to our 50th percentile. 

H1 CDS
carlos.perez@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:55, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55713)
Digital Video Cameras failed
Yesterday 3/19/2020 at 21:35 PST the switch in the CER (sw-lvea-aux) rebooted by itself affecting some of the digital cameras.
Today 3/20/2020 at 8:40 PST I rebooted all 3 digital video servers and restored all cameras to a working state.
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:10, Saturday 21 March 2020 - last comment - 09:30, Saturday 21 March 2020(55707)
Shift transition- Day shift

TITLE: 03/21 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_CONF state: WINDY
    Wind: 6mph Gusts, 4mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.14 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked 11h30. Environment is good. The PSL cameras are blank but it seems like Dave knows about this from alog 55704

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 08:39, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55708)

I rebooted nuc21, PSL camera FOM images are back online.

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 08:42, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55709)

Carlos is rebooting the digital camera servers to restore the gigabit-ethernet cameras which are down following the switch reboot yesterday evening.

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 08:54, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55710)

Okay, that took me out of observing from 15:42 to 15:45 UTC. 

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 09:30, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55712)

All GIG-E cameras are operational again.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:50, Friday 20 March 2020 - last comment - 15:21, Saturday 21 March 2020(55696)
started raw minute data offloading process on h1tw0

WP8572 h1tw0 raw minute data offload

TJ, Dave:

With H1 out-of-lock, I have started the h1tw0 offloading process. I have switched the active /trend/minute_raw to an empty directory set at 12:35 PDT, its data epoch is 12:39PDT. The data directory with the last 8 months of data was named /trend/minute_raw_1268768058.

h1tw0's minute trend data is served by h1nds0. The only NDS client of h1nds0 is the guardian system. Looking at the guardian user code and speaking with TJ, we think the only guardian NDS requests are for full data (taking averages over time periods from 1 to 10 seconds). Therefore I am not going to restart h1nds0 to serve recent minute-trend data from the temporary location /trend/minute_raw_1268768058 since restarting h1nds0 will have a greater impact on guardian than the loss of the last 8 months of raw minute trends.

I'm preparing h1fw0 to start the copy of the minute-raw files from h1tw0 to their final archival location on h1ldasgw0 compressed ZFS raid. The copy is expected to take the whole weekend to complete.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 13:39, Friday 20 March 2020 (55698)

I started the file copy at 13:07. Current estimate is for completion in 26 hours (15:00 Saturday).

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 15:21, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55715)

copy completed at 15:14 PDT.

H1 GRD
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:22, Tuesday 17 March 2020 - last comment - 11:31, Sunday 22 March 2020(55655)
ALS_DIFF only passes through NO_IR_FOUND

The past few nights Corey has been notified that ALS_DIFF was unable to find IR. Looking back at the logs this node would only pass through the state "NO_IR_FOUND", and not stop. This is because it would return true regardless of the values that got it to this point and move onto IR_FOUND. In ISC_LOCK, the CHECK_IR state has a different test than what was done in ALS_DIFF. So there is an inconsistency of what is acceptable for the amount of IR light in DIFF.

By this time the IFO was on its way up after maintenance, so I just made two quick changes:

  1. ALS_DIFF to will stay in NO_IR_FOUND unless it is requested to search for IR again, or the IR value increases. According to a comment in this code they wanted to be able to search again, but this made it so it would just move on.
  2. I changed ISC_LOCK's state, FIND_IR, to allow ALS_DIFF to search for IR two times. I'm thinking that as it fine tunes it will find a better value, but maybe it will just get back to where it was. This is just an adhesive bandage, not a long-term solution.

The long term solution will be to make the tests the same, and hopefully find a way to have it be more reliable. I'll to talk to others and see what we come up with.

Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 11:31, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55725)
Today I got the "IR was not found" message just 13 seconds after the IFO went into the FIND_IR state. This due to ALS_COMM reporting NO_IR_FOUND, ALS_DIFF hadn't been requested to search yet.
I wonder if this change had any effect on ALS_COMM.
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:22, Sunday 15 March 2020 - last comment - 15:09, Sunday 22 March 2020(55601)
H1 Lockloss 17:53:18 UTC
Lost lock, after 29h30m lock. No obvious reason why. Environmental conditions are all fine.
 
No green light on the y-arm yet so it will be interesting to see how increase flashes copes with that, I may have to intervene.
We saw this before after a long 58 hour lock with dramatic temperature change (alog 54580). Though I'm not sure we can blame temperature here as the outside temurature has only changed +3°C since the last lock. -16°C  change from a few days go it if takes the equipment a long time to change temperature.
Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 12:23, Sunday 15 March 2020 (55602)

Had to move both ETMY and TMSY a decent way to get light onto the camera (20 counts on the slider for ETMX Pit and 15 for TMSY Pit).

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 14:54, Sunday 15 March 2020 (55604)

Had dragged TMSY too far away from it's normal position so that we were not getting enough light on the QPD's and had ALS_Y in fault with message "PZT trig servo not on". I think this is a different problem to the one disrupted by TJ in alog alog 54526 but it may be related.

Keita helped me to get light back on the QPDs:

From sitemap>ALS> End Y overview > QPD_A (FE) and QPD_B (FE), the NSUM should be ~1 for green arms locking, was closer to 0.05. after deciding that the suspensions had bee moved too much, we the QPD NSUMs and the alignment sliders and reverted them to their values at the time of last green arms locking, then did the same for the BIAS on the PZT1 and PZT2 PIT and YAW filters. NSUMS then came up to 1. Rs-adjusted the PZT filter bias numbers to be closer to their outputs and then continued locking.

We have just lost PRMI lock (not total lock) 3 times after I noticed that the FIND_IR TR_Y trace was way higher than it should be attached photo (20 rather than 1). Something strange must have happened so I will try and initial alignment.

Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 15:16, Sunday 15 March 2020 (55606)

DRMI locked straight away after a smooth initial alignment. Unsure what went on before!

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 15:51, Sunday 15 March 2020 (55607)ISC
22:44 Observing 
A very long lock acquisition, will try to understand this week what are the best steps to take in the future when there is no light on the Green camera.
Accepted the SDFs related the the PZT BIAS changes I made with Keita, attached. tagging ISC ?
Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 15:09, Sunday 22 March 2020 (55727)ISC

At the start of this locking acquisition, there was no light on ALS-Y_QPD_B (NSUM ~  0.05). ALSY PZT1 and PZT2 were then not adjusted. It can be seen from the top 2 plots of the attached image  that they were being significantly adjusted at the start of each green arms locking to maximize QPD light. Keita helped me move the PZT1 and PZT2 values closer to the values which maximized NSUM in the past so in future they should not be so far away. 

It's still not clear why there was no light on QPD_B to start with. The values of PZT1 and PZT2 do drift over time to give the maximum light on the QPDs so it's possible that to was just out of range. Maybe these biases should be checked and adjusted more regularly. Tagging ISC

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 35121-35140 of 89220.Go to page Start 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 End