Displaying reports 35141-35160 of 89220.Go to page Start 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 End
Reports until 08:10, Saturday 21 March 2020
H1 General
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:10, Saturday 21 March 2020 - last comment - 09:30, Saturday 21 March 2020(55707)
Shift transition- Day shift

TITLE: 03/21 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 117Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_CONF state: WINDY
    Wind: 6mph Gusts, 4mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.14 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked 11h30. Environment is good. The PSL cameras are blank but it seems like Dave knows about this from alog 55704

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 08:39, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55708)

I rebooted nuc21, PSL camera FOM images are back online.

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 08:42, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55709)

Carlos is rebooting the digital camera servers to restore the gigabit-ethernet cameras which are down following the switch reboot yesterday evening.

camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 08:54, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55710)

Okay, that took me out of observing from 15:42 to 15:45 UTC. 

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 09:30, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55712)

All GIG-E cameras are operational again.

H1 GRD
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:03, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55706)
Dropped out of Observe by hardware injection failure?

IFO was knocked out of Observe, looks like 11:30-11:37 utc, based on IFO guardian log, because hardware injections failed? Not sure what happened, I didn't do anything to fix it. IFO resolved itself, but I still got the notfication. I can't find any evidence that anything else happened.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:09, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55705)
Ops Eve Shift Summary
TITLE: 03/20 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 118Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jim
SHIFT SUMMARY: One lock loss from observing, likely from an earthquake that was too close to respond to in time. Got a call from Dave about the network switch (see his alog).
LOG:

00:46 UTC Started Jenne's move SR3 back script.
01:38 UTC Lock loss, likely from earthquake,
01:39 UTC Nearby earthquake from United_States
01:43 UTC Set SR3 Pitch to 438.4
02:18 UTC Lock loss from DARM_TO_DC_READOUT
02:39 UTC Lock loss from POWER_10_W
IR not found, adjusted manually.
03:29 UTC Observing. No SDF differences.
H1 CDS (PSL)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:17, Friday 20 March 2020 (55704)
CER network switch went offline for 12 minutes this evening, some digital cameras are down

The Cisco network switch in the CER went down for 12 minutes this evening from 09:34 to 09:46 PDT. While this was down, the network connection to the PSL diode room IOC was unavailable and the EDC showed 357 disconnected channels. The CDS H/W monitor also showed network disconnection to h1pslctrl0.

After the switch rebooted, several cameras did not come back and need to be rebooted. These do not appear to be critical and hopefully we can delay rebooting them until tomorrow.

                   H1 MC Refl (h1cam02) has a frozen image
                        H1 PR2 (h1cam08) has a frozen image
                        H1 MC1 (h1cam11) has a frozen image
                        H1 PRM (h1cam13) has a frozen image
                    ISCT6 SHG TRANS (18) has a frozen image
                       H1 ITMX (h1cam21) has a frozen image
                            BS (h1cam26) has a frozen image
                     H1_IO_GIGE1_h1cam28 has a frozen image
 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:13, Friday 20 March 2020 (55702)
Ops Day Shift
Ops Shift Log: 03/17/2020, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 - 16:00) Time - UTC (PT)
State of H1: Locked at NLN, range 114.0Mpc
Intent Bit: Observing
Support: N/A
Incoming Operator: Patrick
Shift Summary: Quiet day shift of observing and commissioning. Everything is good.
 
Activity Log: Time - UTC (PT)
14:32 (07:32) GRB Short Alert – Spoke with LLO, Ignored due to long latency
15:00 (08:00) Take over from Corey
17:30 (10:30) Drop out of Observing for commissioning
17:35 (10:35) Lock loss – Commissioning
19:30 (12:30) Dave – Working on unload of H1-TW0 raw minute trend data (WP #8572)
19:35 (12:35) Relocked and back in Observing
21:30 (14:30) Jenne – Commissioning – Did not need to go out of Observing
23:00 (16:00) Turn over to Patrick
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:04, Friday 20 March 2020 (55701)
Ops Eve Shift Start
TITLE: 03/20 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 115Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jeff
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_CONF state: WINDY
    Wind: 10mph Gusts, 7mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.10 μm/s 
QUICK SUMMARY:

No known issues.
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:28, Friday 20 March 2020 - last comment - 18:00, Friday 20 March 2020(55699)
Moving SR3 in observing

Starting at 14:15 Pacific I am moving SR3 in pitch in steps of 0.01, with several seconds of pause between each step.  This is slow enough that it is okay to do in Observing.  I'll update this alog or add a comment when I'm done.

To do this in observe, I unmonitored the SR3 opticalign sliders.

Earlier today during commissioning time I was trying to move faster, and killed the lock with a step of 1.0.  At that time, I also had the DARM offset reduced to about 5pm, which makes it easier to see the change in junk light getting to the DCPDs. 

Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 18:00, Friday 20 March 2020 (55703)

All done for now.  The farthest I got was about 465.5 on the SR3 pitch slider, which is a move of about 27 urad.  I didn't move yaw at all.  I'm sure I could have gone farther, but I don't really want to babysit it anymore tonight.

Patrick is running a script that will, with the same size / speed steps, move SR3 back to its nominal pit slider position of 438.4. 

Perhaps on Monday I'll try either yaw, or more pitch, although so far I don't see any change at all, either in kappa_c or in the CFTD (compensated for cal changes over time) spectrum.  The attachment shows spectra from earlier today and at the far position, and I can't tell the difference, although I'll look a little more closely on Monday morning.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:50, Friday 20 March 2020 - last comment - 15:21, Saturday 21 March 2020(55696)
started raw minute data offloading process on h1tw0

WP8572 h1tw0 raw minute data offload

TJ, Dave:

With H1 out-of-lock, I have started the h1tw0 offloading process. I have switched the active /trend/minute_raw to an empty directory set at 12:35 PDT, its data epoch is 12:39PDT. The data directory with the last 8 months of data was named /trend/minute_raw_1268768058.

h1tw0's minute trend data is served by h1nds0. The only NDS client of h1nds0 is the guardian system. Looking at the guardian user code and speaking with TJ, we think the only guardian NDS requests are for full data (taking averages over time periods from 1 to 10 seconds). Therefore I am not going to restart h1nds0 to serve recent minute-trend data from the temporary location /trend/minute_raw_1268768058 since restarting h1nds0 will have a greater impact on guardian than the loss of the last 8 months of raw minute trends.

I'm preparing h1fw0 to start the copy of the minute-raw files from h1tw0 to their final archival location on h1ldasgw0 compressed ZFS raid. The copy is expected to take the whole weekend to complete.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 13:39, Friday 20 March 2020 (55698)

I started the file copy at 13:07. Current estimate is for completion in 26 hours (15:00 Saturday).

david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 15:21, Saturday 21 March 2020 (55715)

copy completed at 15:14 PDT.

H1 SUS
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:19, Friday 20 March 2020 - last comment - 12:17, Monday 30 March 2020(55695)
ITMY max gain changes

Since we lost lock this morning, I took this opportunity to change the max gain to nominal values for ITMY mode 3, 12 and 15. Previously these modes had their max gain set to zero (although we had non zero nominal values for them). Often Guardian would set the gain to max for these modes and hence stop damping them - which is not ideal. In the changed scenario, Guardian will damp these modes regardless of whether max or nominal gain is applied. I have committed the lscparams.py on the svn and loaded the coefficients.

I will track their development over the next few lock stretches.

Comments related to this report
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 12:17, Monday 30 March 2020 (55825)

Following up these changes, I found that no changes were obserrved on ITMY mode 3 and 15, however ITMY 12 monitor level dropped from around 1.0 to less than 0.5- which is good to see.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:11, Friday 20 March 2020 (55694)
Ops Day Mid-Shift Summary
   Currently relocking the IFO. No other issues at this time.   
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:42, Friday 20 March 2020 (55691)
Ops Day Shift Transition
Ops Shift Transition: 03/20/2020, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 -16:00) - UTC (PT)
State of H1: Locked at NLN
Intent Bit: Observing
Weather:  Skies are partly cloudy, with no rain in the forecast. The temperatures currently are in the mid-30s, Winds are CALM  
Primary 0.03 – 0.1Hz: 0.009um/s
Secondary 0.1 – 0.3Hz: 0.9um/s
Outgoing Operator: Corey
Quick Summary: The IFO has been Observing for the past 38 hours. The range is 119.9Mpc. All looks good at this time.

 

H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:02, Friday 20 March 2020 (55689)
Shift Summary - Eve

TITLE: 03/20 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 116Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jim
SHIFT SUMMARY:

LOG:

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:54, Thursday 19 March 2020 (55688)
Noise Budget injections

This afternoon we took almost an hour of commisioning time to do noise budget injections (from home).  I did MICH, SRCL, PRCL, IMC PZT P+Y, ISS, CHARD P+Y, DHARD P+Y, and MICH ASC P+Y. 

We then took 15 minutes of reference time with no squeezing starting at 1268683369 (1:03-1:19 local time)

The most important injection that I didn't do was frequency noise, which requires a cable to be plugged in for the excitation.

H1 SUS
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:17, Tuesday 17 March 2020 - last comment - 16:56, Tuesday 31 March 2020(55666)
ITMX (mode 2,3,4) damping filter change

Cheryl (over phone), Rahul

This morning we made changes to the damping filter for ITMX mode 2,3,4. We narrowed down the band pass filter and moved them away from Interfering from each other. Next we loaded the coefficients and made the gains to be zero on lscparam (followed by svn commit). Jeff. B then attempted to lock  the IFO and during this time I found a good gain settings for ITMX mode 3 (gain of -20) and was tinkering with IMTX mode 2 (with a very small gain of -0.1). We lost lock after some time hence I was not able to find a good value for mode 2. 

During the second attempt of locking, the modes were rung up and we lost lock very quickly. Next I reverted all the damping filter settings (including lscparams) back to how it was this morning at 8am. In the third attempt I requested Jeff. B to hold on at PREP_ASC_FOR_FULL_IFO, while I was manually damping the rung-up modes. We stayed at this state for an hour or so, and the rung up modes were damping well. Hence I requested Ed (who took over form Jeff. B) to start moving up the ISC lock state - here we lost the lock once again.

In the fourth attempt, the violins looked fine and we are currently locked and Observing (at 0:14 UTC).

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 08:39, Friday 20 March 2020 (55690)

Plots of the three attempts at reaching NLN that did not make it, which include the ITMX violin modes 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7.  New filters were tested on modes 2, 3, and 4.  One unexpected event was that damping mode 4 caused mode 5 output to increase, suggesting modes 4 and 5 are the same fiber.  A couple of the lockloss events resulted in ITMX L2 DAMP pitch changing bu about 10urad, which doesn't seem to be the case for every lockloss, however the third lockloss can be attributed to violins, since some were rung up to a level where the RMS was 6.5 to 7.

  • pg1 - the first lock
  • pg 2 - the first lockloss
  • pg 3 - the second lock
  • pg 4- the second lockloss
  • pg 5- the third lock
  • pg 6 - the third lockloss - view 1
  • pg 7 - the third lockloss - view 2
Non-image files attached to this comment
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 09:10, Friday 20 March 2020 (55692)

Plot showing ITMX mode 5 ringing up.  This is about 60 seconds of data, showing damping on modes 2, 3, 5, and 7

Trends are color coded:

  • magenta = mode 3 damping on
  • green =  mode 5 damping on, mode 3 damping off
  • red = mode 5 damping off, mode 5 RMS jumps from 5.8 to 6.45, +0.65
    • mode 3 damping reduced the RMS, mode 5 damping increased the mode 3 RMS
Images attached to this comment
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 10:23, Monday 30 March 2020 (55820)

Phase plots of the old and new damping filter is attached below.

Images attached to this comment
rahul.kumar@LIGO.ORG - 16:56, Tuesday 31 March 2020 (55836)

Given below are the phase information (old vs new) for the band pass filter designed for ITMX mode 2,3,4. I have also attached 3 figures which shows the bode plot from foton. One can compare the old and new filter design using these plots.

ITMX mode 2 (504.887 Hz)

Phase old: -412 (+360-412= -52 degrees)

Phase new: -619 (+360-619 = -259 degrees)

This filter has a Phase difference of -207 degrees, hence will require a sign change by 180 degrees.

ITMX mode 3 (504.719 Hz)

Phase old: -360 (+360-360 = 0 degrees)

Phase new: -719 (+360-719= -359 degrees)

This filter has a Phase difference of 1 degree, hence will not require any phase change.

ITMX mode 4 (504.852 Hz)

Phase old: -402 (+360-402= -42degrees)

Phase new: -818  (=360 – 818 = -458 degrees, i.e. -98degrees)

This filter has a Phase difference of -57 degrees, hence will require a sign change by -60 degrees.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:24, Thursday 13 February 2020 - last comment - 13:04, Friday 20 March 2020(55081)
Lock Loss 1723 UTC

No obvious cause.

Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 09:42, Thursday 13 February 2020 (55082)Lockloss, PSL

The FSS started to oscillate about 150seconds 30seconds before we lost lock. During relocking we keep losing lock at various places and there is slight motion seen in the Ref Cav Trans spot.

Images attached to this comment
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 09:58, Thursday 13 February 2020 (55083)Lockloss, PSL

The lock loss at 0714 UTC looks similar as well. Something is seen in that channel 45 seconds before.

Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 16:57, Wednesday 19 February 2020 (55188)Lockloss
I have looked into what are normal ranges for this channel are when we are locked (over the past month and a snapshot in July, which looked similar).
It seems that we survive periods with the FSS piezo channel H1:PSL-FSS_FAST_MON_OUT_DQ  sustained near 3. And survive fast spikes up 9. Seen in the attached images (sustained vs peaks).
The value of this channel on both cases the IFO lost lock that TJ found, were sustained near 6. so much higher than we normally see.
Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 13:04, Friday 20 March 2020 (55697)PSL
In the week spoken about above, we had 5 locklosses that looked like this with the FSS_NPRO_TEMP and FSS_FAST (PZT) signals oscillating shortly before lockloss:
2020-02-15 10:41:46 UTC,  2020-02-15 04:11:04 UTC, 2020-02-14 14:13:51 UTC,  2020-02-13 17:23:22 UTC, 2020-02-13 07:14:20 UTC
We then had no more locklosses that looked like this until this week (1 month on), where we have had 3:
2020-03-19 00:02:17 UTC, 2020-03-17 14:25:22 UTC (image attached), 2020-03-17 12:12:47 UTC. 
Microseism was high in the first set of locklosses, but this week all the environmental conditions have been calm.
We should continue to investigate what signal is becoming unstable and being fed back into the PSL signals or whether the PSL is causing this.
Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 35141-35160 of 89220.Go to page Start 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 End