Displaying reports 40861-40880 of 88889.Go to page Start 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 End
Reports until 12:16, Tuesday 28 May 2019
H1 IOO (IOO)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:16, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49503)
IM transfrer functions taken today, analysis in progress

Took transfer functions on IM1, IM2, and IM3.  The analysis of the data is in progress.  I've checked the alignment of the optics, before/after, and all (including IM4) match to within 2 urad, their alignment before the previous lock (last unlocked data before Maintenance 5/28 3:30 UTC, compared to "now," 19:04 UTC).

- Rahul, Cheryl

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:13, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49502)
PSL Power Watchdog Reset (FAMIS 10712)

I reset both PSL power watchdogs at 19:02 UTC (12:02 PDT).  This completes FAMIS 10712.

H1 SQZ
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:51, Tuesday 28 May 2019 - last comment - 16:19, Friday 31 May 2019(49500)
squeezer laser current changed again

Main message: I've made another change to the squeezer laser current, which will hopefully give us a week or two without mode hopping, but it seems that we need to start planning on changing out the squeezer laser. 

The first attachment shows a 60 day trend of the squeezer laser power, and the green power produced by the SHG degrading as the laser mode hopping becomes worse.  Jeff B and I had made a small adjustment to the laser current last Friday, 49327 but this step was not large enough to fix the problem.  

We have potentially three ways to quickly see that the laser is multi-mode, SHG scan, OPO scan, and by looking at the beatnote.  Today it seemed like the OPO and SHG scans are both useful, but I could not tell the difference between the two current settings by looking at the beatnote.  The second attached screenshots shows the SHG and OPO scans before and after lowering the laser current from 2A according to the laser controller to 1.857A on the laser controller.  The readbacks for the laser current are consistently lower (shown in yellow in the screenshot) than the front panel readbacks.  While watching both of these scans with the laser current set to the multi-mode value, I tried blocking the two main paths to see if that would change the behavoir.  (While watching the SHG scan, I blocked the path which goes to the seed, clf and beatnote, saw not change in mode hopping in SHG scan. Then I blocked the SHG while watching seed scan of OPO, no change).  So if the problem is due to laser feedback it is from a problem upstream of the split between the two paths, I looked through this path two weeks ago during Tuesday maintenance and again today.

This new current setting is low, which may mean that we cannot engage the noise eater with this setting.  I changed the diode current nominal level to reflect the change.  

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 15:49, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49515)

A few more comments on the squeezer today:

Because the ref cav transmission was increased, there is now much more light coming to the squeezer fiber from the PSL, so I've increased H1:SQZ-FIBR_TRANS_DC_HIGH.  I increased the limits on this PD, I do not think that we are in danger of saturating the beatnote diode which was why Daniel had enforced the limits in the first place (right now we have -3dBm of RF and half a mW of DC power).   

The beatnote strength was initially decreased to -20dBm after I changed the laser current despite the increase in power from the PSL.  I went back to the table and adjusted the alignment of the beam onto the beatnote diode, which brought the beatnote back up to -3dBm.  Nutsinee had once before made a comment that changing the current on the squeezer laser seemed to change the downstream alignment, this could be consistent with that happening. 

It seems that the SHG power servo has mostly been sitting at its rails for more than a week.  For today I have reset the set point, so it is running.  I also added a notification to the squeezer guardian that would at least tell the operators that it is railed.  I think that this power stabilization would work more reliably if the laser were not running multi-mode.  

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 16:19, Friday 31 May 2019 (49582)

The first attachment shows that the SHG power fluctuations which have been characteristic of the squeezer laser mode hopping have not returned (yet) after Tuesday's current change.  The green power produced by the SHG has been dropping, along with the IR power transmitted by the SHG, but more slowly.  

Keita suggested looking at the intensity noise out of the laser might be a usefull way to diagnose mode hopping while the cavities are blocked.  The second attachment shows a spectrum from the laser power monitor diode, which is after the EOM.  It does have a change in the spectrum for the low and high current times. 

 

Images attached to this comment
H1 TCS (OpsInfo)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:45, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49501)
Updated the TCSY Rot. Stage Calibration

Since I had brought the chiller down today, it found a new lock point with a slightly different power. I just eyeballed and guessed H1:TCS-ITMY_CO2_LASERPOWER_POWER_IN from 4.6W to 4.5W and this seemed to make the power guardian happy.

H1 TCS
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:40, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49499)
TCS Y Leak Update

Recap: The TCS Y chiller was found to be very low on water on May 21 (alog49382). Since then there was a steady decrease in water, but over the weekend it seemed to have stopped leaking.

Today I turned off the chiller and started looking for any trace of a leak. This chiller has leaked before creating large corroded areas, so it is hard to find any new leaks that may have dried up. I was unable to find any water where it shouldn't be, but I did find some corrosion streaks that I didn't recall being there before. These streaks can be traced back to near the lip of the fill port.

I talked to Betsy and she mentioned that she had noticed the flow going into the filter splashing a bit more than usual when she had checked on the 23rd. She adjusted the wire mesh and the splashing went away. According to the fill log, this was right around the time that we stopped losing around 0.5L/day. Our current theory is that the wire mesh that the incoming water to the reservoir has to pass through, had moved a bit and caused some splashing. We have seen this before, and there is not much we can do to prevent it, other than check on it from time to time. We will keep an eye on it in the coming days to make sure that this is actually the cause. I fired up the chiller again and reset the controller and all seems well.

Side note: I swapped out the water and air filters for TCSY and just the air filter for TCSX because they were gross and probably past due to change. This is reflected in the paper log, as well as here, obviously. (The picture of the water filters has the one I just pulled from TCSY on the left, and the last one that I pulled from a chiller on the right. Seems that the color is a bit less green and more gray now.)

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:29, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49498)
No further MC SUS glitches

Still no further MC SUS glitches.  I searched back thru the weekend lock loss and lock attempts for those MC SUS glitches which were a problem a week ago.  They are still not a problem.

 

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=49366

H1 PEM (SEI)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:58, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49497)
Spectra of EndX PEM & Fence Anemometers

Attached is spectra of the EndX Anemometers during a wind event over the weekend.  The start time is 2100 on 26 May when the average speed hits 15mps and stays up for ~5 hours with averages touching 30mps.  These channels come in as meter per second so I only applied a calibration of 1 so I think the units displayed are correct.

Check the mapping in the third attachment of 49387 to see the location of the Fence wind sensors.  Verbally, SPEED_4 is ~collocated with the WIND_ROOF sensor.  Speed_3 is west and high, Speed_2 is closer to the fence and only 12' up.  During this windy period the direction of the wind was pretty 'northerly' coming almost straight down the Xarm toward the corner

Generally, the WIND_ROOF sensor has a higher ASD than the FENCE sensors.  Does this indicate it is more sensitive or more noisy?  Based on the time series though, the PEM weather sensor is more responsive than the PCE Fence sensors, even the #4 up on the roof.  The other two sensors are understandably appear less sensitive as they are at less than 1/2 the altitude as the roof top sensors.

Images attached to this report
H1 AOS
sharan.banagiri@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:37, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49495)
PEM with Rain using HAM6 Vac accelerometer

S Banagiri, P Covas, R Schofield

We looked into the adhoc rain pem injection in more detail ( mentioned here before ), using transfer function measurements by Philippe Nguyen with the HAM6 Vac accelerometer. Quantitatively, these predictions show that we somewhat underestimate the noise in DARM during rain using only the HAM6 accelerometer prediction. I attach a plot of a DARM background ASD and DARM during rain plotted in black and red respectively using about 5 minutes of data. Also plotted are the predictions of DARM noise in the 30 - 100 Hz band using the HAM6 Vac accelerometer. The blue curve is the ambient noise prediction and the green curve is the prediction during rain. 

 

Images attached to this report
H1 General
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:14, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49493)
Ops Day Shift Transition

Ops Shift Transition: 05/28/2019, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00-16:00) - UTC (PT)

State of H1: Locked

Intent Bit: Commissioning

Weather: Low wind, clear sky

Primary 0.03 – 0.1Hz: 0.01 um/s

Secondary 0.1 – 0.3Hz: 0.08 um/s

Outgoing Operator: Jeff

Quick Summary: Out of Observing for Tuesday maintenance, still locked for now.

H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:09, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49492)
Ops Owl Shift Summary
Ops Shift Log: 05/28/2019, Owl Shift 07:00 – 15:00 (00:00 - 00:00) Time - UTC (PT)
State of H1: Locked at NLN with 110.9Mpc of range
Intent Bit: Maintenance – Corrective Maintenance  
Support: N/A
Incoming Operator: Niko
Shift Summary: IFO was locked in Observing for entire shift. Dropped out of Observing to run the PEM injections.  
 
Activity Log: Time - UTC (PT)
07:00 (00:00) Take over from Corey
11:01 (04:01) GRB Alert – LLO is down and Virgo just back on-line
14:44 (07:44) Grounds keeping crew started
14:45 (07:45) Drop out of Observing to run PEM injections
14:54 (07:54) Back into Observing after injections finished
14:56 (07:56) PBS Physics Girl film crew on site
14:59 (07:59) Chris – Taking small tractor down Y-Arm for sweeping
14:59 (07:59) Set SEI_CONF to SC_OFF_NOBRSXY
15:00 (08:00) Turn over to Niko

 

H1 SEI
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:18, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49491)
Weekly ISI CPS Noise Spectra Checks (FAMIS #12849)
   Posted are the plots from the weekly CPS Noise Spectra. For the most part they look OK. There are several spikes in V1, V2, and V3 channels for almost all the platforms, which may be normal.  
Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:53, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49490)
PSL Weekly Status Report


    Laser Status:
    Front End Power is 31.98W (should be around 30 W)
    70W Output Power is 70.16W
    Front End Watch is GREEN
    70W Watch is GREEN

    PMC:
    It has been locked 13 days, 18 hr 48 minutes (should be days/weeks)
    Reflected power = 10.04Watts
    Transmitted power = 54.57Watts
    PowerSum = 64.61Watts.

    FSS:
    It has been locked for 0 days 8 hr and 35 min (should be days/weeks)
    TPD[V] = 1.781V (min 0.9V)

    ISS:
    The diffracted power is around 2.2%
    Last saturation event was 0 days 11 hours and 23 minutes ago (should be days/weeks)


    Possible Issues:

 

H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:06, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49489)
Ops Owl Mid-Shift Summary
   Good Observing for first half of the shift. The range is around 110.0Mpc. The wind and microseism have settled down a bit over the course of the morning. In general, all is well.
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:12, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49487)
Ops Owl Shift Transition
Ops Shift Transition: 05/27/2019, Owl Shift 07:00 – 15:00 (00:00 -08:00) - UTC (PT)
State of H1: Locked at NLN
Intent Bit: Observing
Weather:  The skies are clear; temperatures are in the upper 60s to low 70s. The wind is ranging between 7 and 15 mph.
Primary 0.03 – 0.1Hz: 0.03um/s
Secondary 0.1 – 0.3Hz: 0.2mu/s
Outgoing Operator: Corey
Quick Summary: IFO has been locked and Observing for 2.25 hours. The range is 110.8Mpc. All appears normal at this time.
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:05, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49478)
EVE Operator Summary

TITLE: 05/27 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jeff
SHIFT SUMMARY:

Mainly focused on PSL RefCav for first part of shift.  Made it back to OBSERVING & have been locked for 3+hrs.

Most of H1 activity alogged earlier.
LOG:

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:25, Monday 27 May 2019 (49486)
SQZ Manager Request Changed

Pretty sure this is my fault. 

Noticing a Notification for ISC_LOCK node:  SQZ_MANAGER:  REQUEST CHANGED (was:  SQZ_READY_IFO, now:  SQUEEZING)

This does not keep us out of OBSERVING.  Did I change the nominal?  If so, will want to make SQZ_READY_IFO nominal next time we are out of OBSERVING.

H1 General (PSL, SQZ)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:51, Monday 27 May 2019 (49484)
H1 back to OBSERVING! Issues: RefCav low transmission, SQZ did not lock, ASC wants to drive off (SRM?) at OFFLOAD DRMI

4:43:  H1 back to OBSERVING!! (joining L1 & V1 who were in Stand Down from a couple of GRBs)

Very tough first 1/2 of the shift.  COMM Gain increase might have made locking tough at the beginning.  So, attempted to touch up RefCav alignment via picomotors (see earlier alog).

After my paltry RefCav improvement, attempted locking.  Something still not quire right.  Alignment looks decent from earlier INITIAL ALIGNMENT, but ASC drives someone off around OFFLOAD_DRMI, so need to be quick to correct it (I chose SRM yaw)!

Then moved all the way through Locking states up until the Squeezer (for this, since I'm clueless about the Squeezer, I called Georgia & we walked through it).  See her alog for specifics.  Once squeezer was locked, had a few SDFs to take care of (see below).  Also needed to raise the FSS COMM Gain from 25.0 to 26.5 to get rid of the DARM high freq noise "tail".

Notes:

H1 SQZ (SQZ)
georgia.mansell@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:44, Monday 27 May 2019 - last comment - 21:53, Monday 27 May 2019(49483)
Squeezer stuck at LOCK_CLF, fixed by init'ing the SQZ_MANAGER GRD

The squeezer got stuck trying to lock the CLF tonight. I thought this could be related to the low LO power at the CLF demoduator (see attached screenshot), but it looks like this level has been low for a while. Corey init'd the SQZ_MANAGER guardian and it locked the CLF just fine so we don't know what was actually causing the problem.

 

(We initially thought that since CLF_REFL_RF6_DEMOD was super low (-50) that we needed to align the ZM's but we were confusing the LO and CLF loops -- the RF6 was low because the beam diverter was closed and does not get opened until the next step in the locking sequence.)

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 21:53, Monday 27 May 2019 (49485)

Attached are the SQZ guardian nodes & logs we had when the SQZ was having its issues.

Images attached to this comment
H1 PSL
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:34, Monday 27 May 2019 - last comment - 02:59, Tuesday 28 May 2019(49482)
Remote Alignment Touch-Up For RefCav: Only Small Improvement (over ~90min attempt)

After running an alignment earlier, Sheila suggested I increase the FSS COMM Gain from 26dB to 29dB (Over last couple of days we have gone up from around 23dB up to 26dB due to the RefCav transmission nose-diving after the big Peru EQ).  Unfortunately after I went to this higher gain, I could no longer get past LOCKING_ALS...even when I reduced the gain back to 26 & 25dB. 

At this point I gave Jason a call so he could walk me through what to do to touch up the RefCav alignment.  Starting at about 1.77V, I was able to take a decent step up to around 1.84V, but after that I just could not get any big improvements...I might have max-ed at about 1.87V...but this is still pretty horrible since this should be up around 4V (and this was with me spending atleast 90min trying to touch up the alignment. (a few hours of the transmission signal is attached).

I finally decided to give up on this and move on. 

The FSS COMM Gain was at 25dB (1dB lower than at the beginning of the shift); I was hesitant to go to 26dB or higher due to the difficulties in getting past LOCKING_ALS earlier. 

LOCKING:

One attempt broke lock at ACQUIRE DRMI.

Current attempt maid it to OFFLOAD_DRMI_ASC...but I really had to watch it toward the end of this step because the last few steps of this state would drive POP18 down & make PRC Gain noisier---I literally had to tweak SRM in Yaw quickly to keep the alignment from being driven off and breaking lock.  Have optimized alignment best I can here at DRMI, and have hung out at OFFLOAD DRMI for about 10min (to make sure everything looks calm & flat before moving on)....Will move on and see what happens.

[And I need a break, so will be making lunch soon.]

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 02:59, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49488)
Whilst adjusting the alignment to the reference cavity, care should be exercised that the
beam does not walk off the locking photodiode.
H1 General (SEI)
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:06, Sunday 26 May 2019 - last comment - 10:13, Monday 17 June 2019(49450)
EQ Recovery / Re-Locking/ Shift Transition Owl

TITLE: 05/26 Owl Shift: 07:00-15:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
INCOMING OPERATOR: Cheryl
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:

9:35 Begin resetting Watchdogs -

9:57 BLRMS below 1um/s - AS spot is low and right

10:07 Everything un-tripped. Everything re-aligned - AS Spot still low and right

11:40 Just got off the phone with Sheila (she called in to check on the quads). I didn't push the big green RECOVER EQ button!!!!!! -_-

11:45 Begin Initial Alignment

12:10 Raine from LLO called to let me know that ALSY tripped and requires a trip to the end station - phone buddy system in effect

12:33 Raine reported back at the corner station.

12:52 begin re-locking H1

14:00 Lock failed at INCREASE POWER

14:23 Lock failed at INCREASE POWER (again)

15:00 Handing off to Cheryl

 

 

 

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 09:23, Sunday 26 May 2019 (49451)

Cheryl, Sheila

Here are links for the two locklosses from increase power that Ed logged:  1242914440 and 1242915786 

In both cases the DSOFT P and CSOFT P control signals became large right after we entered the INCREASE POWER (504) state.  About a week ago we were having trouble suppressing the radiation pressure instability in the X arm because the beams were falling off the QPD.  As a temporary solution we introduced an offset on TMSX TEST P before we increase the power, which is turned off again for lock acquisition so that we do not loose our green alignment references.   We set the ramp time on the offset to 30 seconds, but this must have been reset to 2 seconds this morning either by the suspension guardian when recovering from a watchdog trip or by the dither alignment script.  

We set the ramp time to 30 seconds again, and I added a line to the guardian that sets the ramp time to 30 seconds before turning on the offset in INCREASE_POWER.  Cheryl loaded this and was able to get through the first few steps of the power increase.  

Both the lockloss tool and the new remote access made it much easier than it might have been to diagnose and solve this issue remotely than it would have been in O2. 

edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - 08:35, Tuesday 28 May 2019 (49494)

So we don't think this was simply a symptom of ETMY Modes 1 and 6 being rung up after a very large seismic event? I can say that I hadn't noticed them until the third attempt.

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 10:13, Monday 17 June 2019 (49987)DetChar, SEI
Tagging @DetChar and SEI for data in seismic's sensor correction configuration transition studies.
Displaying reports 40861-40880 of 88889.Go to page Start 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 End