Displaying reports 41021-41040 of 88881.Go to page Start 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 End
Reports until 20:18, Friday 17 May 2019
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:18, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 22:37, Friday 17 May 2019(49326)
Ops Evening Mid-Shift Summary
    Relocked after largish earthquake (Mag 6.0 in the Solomon Islands), high winds (gusts into the 30s), and completion of the today's commissioning activities. Wind and microseism continue to be high. 

   While checking into why range appears a bit low found Squeezer SHG Conversion Efficiency Low message. Have posted screen shots in the aLOG #49325, and have a call into Squeezer support.  
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 22:37, Friday 17 May 2019 (49329)

There was no commissioning activities. Zero.

Everything was to make IFO work again, i.e. corrective maintenance in nature.

H1 AOS
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:05, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 22:50, Friday 17 May 2019(49325)
Squeezer Conversion Efficiency Low
   The range has been a bit low since relock. Thought it might be due to high winds and series of EQs during the shift. In checking the Squeezer, found Squeezer SHG Conversion Efficiency Low status. Posted screen shots of the various related MEMD screens.   
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 22:34, Friday 17 May 2019 (49328)

Looks like the sqz laser has gone fully multi mode (again). The SHG green power is about 40% too low, which in turn reduces the non-linear gain in the OPO and changes the squeezer phase. I would expect squeezing injection to be somewhat ineffective in this state.

sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 22:50, Friday 17 May 2019 (49330)

Agreed Daniel, this laser behavior is worse than ever.  I set the half wave plate to roughly maximize the green into the fiber, which is about 20mW now, so the power into the OPO is similar to how it has been, just fluctuating a lot. 

H1 AOS
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:30, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 19:07, Friday 17 May 2019(49320)
Accept SDF Diffs
   Accepted the following SDF differences after relocked at NLN. 
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 19:07, Friday 17 May 2019 (49324)

The SR2 and RM OPTICALIGN can be unmonitored since they change every lock.  The ASC-X and ASC-Y changes are permanent.  

The ALS Y diode current nominal value was changed because the current of diode 2 is drifting.  It would be a good idea to look at a trend if this and see if the same environmental change that impacted the PSL is having an impact on the ALS lasers. 

I don’t know what the ASC input matrix change is.  If those are the matrix elements for a loop which is not on (Inp2, DC5 or DC7) they don’t matter.  Otherwise it’s concerning.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:22, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 18:18, Friday 17 May 2019(49319)
phasing ADS, moving TMS for red QPDs

After we lost lock aligning the reference cavity, 49305, we had had two relocking attempts so far.  

Because Georgia and Niko had moved the ADS phase around last night, and Georgia looked at the HWS and saw that the beam was moved veritcally on ITMY, I stopped in DC readout to check all the ADS phases.  After ADS converged, I opened the loops, and moved the A2L gains to see if the response was in the I phase.  This was the case for P4, P5 and Y3 (ETMX P, ETMY P, and ITMY Y) but I changed the phases for the other loops.  After changing the phases, I checked that the old A2L gain setting still corresponded to a zero crossing, for two of the loops it did not so I found an A2L gain that gave us a zero crossing for the current alignment.  

  original phase new phase original gain new gain
Y4 (ETMY X Y2L) 140 165 4.95 5.1
Y5 (ETMY Y2L) 140 160 2.029 2.029
P3 I(TMY Y2L) 110 175 -2.6 -2.4

We tried to power up this way, but there radiation pressure soft instability showed up at lower power, and in the X arm only (screenshot).  Since tuesday it has been a common soft instability.  As the 0.5Hz was ringing up, I tried to increase the CSOFT gain, which is normally 15, first to 30 then to 60.  It's not clear if this helped.  

We looked at the TMS QPDs, and saw that for TMSX we are nearly falling off the QPDs.  While sitting at DC readout, we moved TMSX pitch down by 8.6 urad to center the positions on the QPDs.  (We also turned off the offsets in the QPDs, which are no longer used at DC and therefore don't need offsets).  Then we lost lock because of the earthquake.  

We have replaced the TMSX test offset which is used by the dither alignment script to point the green beam to the baffle PDs (-34.1) with our offset of -8.6 urad.  Keita, Georgia and Jeff B will try engaging this in the next lock before powering up to see if this helps the QPD loops do a better job of suppressing the instability.  

We need to spend some time moving pico motors on TMS, because we are also nearly falling off the green QPDs which are used as our initial alignment reference.  That is a longer project though so we will leave it for another time.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
georgia.mansell@LIGO.ORG - 18:18, Friday 17 May 2019 (49321)

We reverted the ADS phasing and A2L gain changes on the ETMs, but kept the change for PIT3/ITMY.

Before we increased the power we added an offset to TMS_X PIT in the test filter, to better center the beam on the QPDs. We then powered up without a problem, so perhaps next week we will adjust the transmon picomotors. In the meantime we have added a line to the guardian at the start of INCREASE_POWER which will automatically switch on this offset, and a line in the down state which will switch it off (this way the TMS will go back to its alignment for green).

H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:22, Friday 17 May 2019 (49318)
Ops Evening Shift Transition
Ops Shift Transition: 05/17/2019, Evening Shift 23:00 – 07:00 (16:00 -00:00) - UTC (PT)
State of H1: Unlocked
Intent Bit: Corrective Maintenance
Weather: Partly cloudy, windy, with rain possible through the evening. Winds are up to a Fresh Breeze (20mph plus); temperatures are in the upper 60s with lows expected in the mid-40s.    
Primary 0.03 – 0.1Hz: 0.1um/s
Secondary 0.1 – 0.3Hz: 0.2mu/s
Outgoing Operator: Corey/Patrick
Quick Summary: IFO is unlocked as the commissioning team continues working on increasing power and stability.  
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:31, Friday 17 May 2019 (49305)
DAY Operator Summary

TITLE: 05/17 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 111Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jeff
SHIFT SUMMARY:

Observing for the first ~3.5hrs of shift.  Went out to address the high-freq intensity noise by touching up refcav alignment.  Relocking was not trivial (with ALS issues, then ran an alignment, then worked on Dither Line Phasing).  Have tried to record notes of locking in other alogs or below.

Reckon we will have SDF diffs to deal with the next time we are ready for Observing (for possibly ADS/Dither Lines, ASC, SQZ, ALS).

Amber Note:  Ballet group will be walking the site (around 3:45pm) scoping out locations for upcoming event.  May or may not need to visit the Control Room.
LOG:

H1 SEI (OpsInfo)
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:16, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 15:14, Thursday 06 June 2019(49315)
HAM 4/5 RX RY blends changed for test

A long time ago I came up with some blend filters to try to improve the 1-10 hz HAM RX/RY motion, to try to reduce SRCL. We ran the filter for about a week last October, but I've been having trouble trying to find good data to compare to the current configuration. Sam Cooper has a document comparing the differences and some of the motivation for finding a better filter at https://dcc.ligo.org/DocDB/0159/T1900107/001/main.pdf. I've switched HAMs 4&5 RX&RY blends to this filter to get some data overnight (or weekend). I made the transition while Corey was locking the IFO, and it's running fine for now. I've accepted the differences in SDF, so this shouldn't prevent us from going to OBSERVE.

The new blends are called "between_350" on the HAM ISI blend screens. If there is some issue where SRCL motion is bad, the old filters are called "notch_rolloff". If there are any questions or anyone needs help reverting over the weekend, give me a call.

Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 16:22, Friday 17 May 2019 (49317)

Some initial data, looks like the blend filters do improve SRCL. Attached plot shows SRCL err from a lock after switching the blends (blue) and a segment from a NLN segment last night before the switch (red). Microseism hasn't changed much, but it is windier now than it was last night, but still the SRCL rms is about half of what it was. The magnitude units are wrong because I'm not sure of the dewhitening filter gain but the filter is shaped with 2 poles at 1 hz and 2 zeros at 100hz. Also the blue traces where taken around DC readout, while the red are from the IFO in NLN, so the blue is missing some high frequency cut-offs making the >10hz noise worse on the blue trace.

Images attached to this comment
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 14:12, Friday 24 May 2019 (49426)

I'm attaching some plots comparing two NLN SRCL asds, first plot is the SRCL ERR, blue is with the new blends, red is the old blends. The new blends are about a factor of 2 better rms between 1 and 10 hz for the SRCL error. I would like to try adding some notches to the blend to see if we can do any better, but this seems like a solid improvement.

The second plot is SRCL suspoint, which uses projections of the ISI GS13s to each relevant suspensions top mass to estimate the SRCL cavity length. This channel combines the suspoint motions of the BSCs and both HAMs, so is not purely deteremined by the improved motion on HAMs 4&5. Again, red is from a lock with the old blends, blue is with the new blends. This also shows a good improvement over the 1-20hz band, with some worse performance below 1hz, but not too bad.

Images attached to this comment
arnaud.pele@LIGO.ORG - 15:14, Thursday 06 June 2019 (49713)

Attached is a comparison of the RX HAM4 blend changes at LHO during May vs the nominal L1 blend filter. The current filter for LHO is the purple one.

We see that LHO has now more isolation than LLO between 1.5-8Hz, but less roll-off above 8Hz. It would be interesting to understand how this difference in the filtering affects the suspoint motion at both sites, as a follow up from 46407.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:58, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 15:17, Friday 17 May 2019(49314)
Small changes to guardian for ASC engagement in DRMI

We've found several times over the last few weeks that the OMs rail as we are trying to engage the AS DC centering loops, in preparation for engaging DRMI ASC.  I'm not sure why this has only started being a problem in the last few weeks and didn't bug us for the last few months.  I think it is happening if we try to turn on the DC centering servos a little too early.  

There is a checker for those loops to check for saturations because we've had this type of problem with the DC centering loops coming on too early in the distant past, but it was looking at the outputs of the DC servo filter banks.  This was the right thing to look at in the past, when we kept integrators in those filter banks.  However in the O2-O3 break we moved the integrators to the suspensions themselves, so now the servo filter bank outputs will always be near zero, and so will always pass the (old version of the) checker.  

I have added a few lines to also check the outputs of the OMs and RMs to see if the MASTER_OUTs are railed. If they are, then the engage_dc_centering states should clear the optics' histories and try again.  When doing this kind of clear history by hand, I've never had to do it more than once, so I'm fairly confident that this will be sufficient and we shouldn't have to worry about this again.  I've left in the old checking functionality too (although right now it'll always pass as okay) in case we ever decide to move the integrators back to the DC filter banks we won't get caught by this.

The following guardians will need to be reloaded: ISC_LOCK, ISC_DRMI, and ALIGN_IFO because they all use the ISC_library code that is now modified.  If there is a problem, one can comment out lines 170-174 in ISC_library.py and reload.


Also, I have added some clear histories and a short wait in ISC_DRMI's prep_for_drmi_asc state for INP1, since sometimes INP1 is sending out a kick and killing the DRMI lock.  I'd seen it several times, but Georgia put together the pattern that it only happens after we've done an initial alignment.  After she pointed that out, I think the problem is that since ISC_DRMI is already sitting in its down state, it doesn't go through down again as we get ready for main lock acquisition, so it doesn't redo the resets of INP1.  Sheila had already moved the gain setting to zero up in the prep_asc state, but because there wasn't a wait and the filters had some history in them, we were sending a short kick out before the gain gets all the way to zero.  Hopefully this will fix this problem, and we won't lose any more DRMI locks due to this.  

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 15:17, Friday 17 May 2019 (49316)

Jenne actully hit the LOAD button for all of the Guardian nodes she mentioned above, and no syntax errors came up.  Operators:  So No Need to Hit LOAD!

But if we have problems with saturations for OM1 & OM2 (or RMs) (which you should also see on the SUS SATURATIONS medm), we'll want to comment the lines out of ISC_library.py & reload it as she mentions above.

H1 PEM (PEM)
sharan.banagiri@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:24, Friday 17 May 2019 (49312)
Using rain as a PEM injection
Sharan, Robert. 

There was heavy rain yesterday (16th May 2019) for about 10 minutes yesterday,  which we used as an adhoc pem injection. The noise from the rain seem to have caused a range drop of at least 2-3 Mpc (see figure 2 below), and coupled with DARM at ~ 48 Hz, 80 - 100 Hz and at ~ 380 Hz (see figure 2). Using the HAM6VAC SEPTUM accelerometer was a witness, the noise below 100 Hz in DARM seems consistent with the coupling estimate from 48912. It is not clear where the 380 Hz line is from, but it can be seen from spectrograms to be present for the duration of the rain (figure 3).



Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:33, Friday 17 May 2019 (49311)
ALSx Arm/Laser Power Glitchy: Toggled ALSx Laser Noise Eater

While locking ALSx arm looked glitchy and we kept breaking lock when Locking ALS.  So toggled the Noise Eater Off/On (on the ALS-X Laser Head medm screen).  Did this twice where I did a quick toggle, but Jenne mentioned leaving it off for 30sec then turned it back ON.

H1 AOS (ISC)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:22, Friday 17 May 2019 (49309)
ALSy Locking Issue & Fixed By: Changing Laser Diode Power Nominal

When locking after the PSL RefCav alignment touch-up, Needed to tweak both green arms, but the oddity this time is ALSy's WFS would not stay engaged. 

From ALS_Overview screen, opened the PLL & PDH screens and they both had issues.  Able to track down issue (by watching the flashing RED status which said "Laser Error".  So opened the ALS Laser medm (attached), and here Sheila noticed a message flash which said something related to "Diode 2".  The Laser Diode 2 Monitor is hovering around 1.6.  This value was out of range for our settings.  [Nominal was 1.4 with a tolerance of 0.2....so we were currently right around the limit of 1.6]. 

So nominal channel (H1:ALS-Y_LASER_HEAD_LASERDIODEPOWERNOMINAL) was changed from: 1.4 to 1.5 to allow for the ALSy Diode 2 Power drift up.

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:40, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 18:43, Friday 17 May 2019(49307)
Refcav Alignment Touch Up (Out Of OBSERVING for CORRECTIVE_MAINTENANCE at 18:28utc)

Summary:  18:28utc:  Out of OBSERVING (CORRECTIVE_MAINTENANCE) for PSL refcav alignment

Sheila checked on the high freq Intensity noise reported by Georgia last night, and has traced this down to PSL Ref Cav transmission (talked with Jason & heard him mention he has noticed this transmission dropping when humidity in the H1 PSL room rises).  Consulted with Keita & we decided to take H1 out of OBSERVING & mark this time as CORRECTIVE_MAINTEANCE (FRS forthcoming).  Keita contacting Brian & I notified other observatory operators via TeamSpeak.

RefCav alignment touch up is being done by Jason here in the control room via picomotors on the table.  This touch up caused a lockloss.  Once Jason is complete, I will take H1 to DC Readout and then we will take this opportunity to check H1's ability to acquire (I assume this will involve alignment stuff---i.e. ASC & Dither line systems).

Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 13:17, Friday 17 May 2019 (49308)

The highest I could get the RefCav TPD voltage was ~2.56V; this is in contrast to our usual max of ~4.2V.  I'm not sure the reason for this difference, but it could be temperature/humidity related.  I took a quick look at temperature and humidity in the laser enclosure over the last few days, see attachment.  The swings in temp and %RH seen in the first half of the plot represent an incursion into the PSL enclosure this last Tuesday, 5/14/2019.  The table north temperature sensor has seen an increase since we left the enclosure, from ~74 °F to ~74.5 °F, while the table south temperature sensor has seen no change.  The humidity in the laser room has seen a large increase since the last incursion, it's currently sitting at ~42% (this makes sense as we've had some spring rain move into the area the latter half of this week).

Images attached to this comment
georgia.mansell@LIGO.ORG - 18:39, Friday 17 May 2019 (49322)

Once we got to NLN the high frequency noise in DARM was still bad.

Keita adjusted the FSS common gain (H1:PSL-FSS_COMMON_GAIN) from 20 dB to 24.5 dB 23 dB, which got rid of the noise. We tried to find a place in the guardian where this gain is set but it looks like it isn't hard coded anywhere, and it will just go back to its original value.

 

If we lose lock and re-acquire and this gain is somehow reverted to 20dB, operators could try stepping it back (eg by running the command z step H1:PSL-FSS_COMMON_GAIN +0.1 until it reaches 23).

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 18:43, Friday 17 May 2019 (49323)

The change was quite drastic, a difference of 1dB or so suddenly quenched terrible high frequency stuff.

24.5dB was based on the fact that the last time FSS common gain was set to 20dB was when the refcav transmission was 4.2, now it is 2.5, so it was the reduction of 4.5dB.

However, after doing that we noticed that H1:PSL-FSS_FAST_MON became quite glitchy, so I reduced it to 23dB, which looks OK.

H1 SQZ
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 03:38, Friday 17 May 2019 - last comment - 14:50, Friday 17 May 2019(49301)
Re-phasing ADS PIT3, un-monitoring SQZ channels

After being locked for ~1.5 hours, ASC yaw oscillations started to build up. I re-phased PIT3 in the ADS overview to 110 via Georgia's original re-phasing alog (49298). This is reducing the oscillations, so I am accepting sdf changes for this phase setting.

Additionally, before this we were getting taken out of Observing sporadically with changes to H1:SQZ-FIBR_SERVO_COMGAIN, H1:SQZ-FIBR_SERVO_FASTGAIN, and H1:SQZ-FIBR_LOCK_TEMPERATURECONTROLS_ON. On the SQZ medm screen it looks like the SHG Power is to blame, as it is railing to -9000. There is an alog about this that Nutsinee posted (48760), but I don't think I can recreate what she did to mitigate the problem. We still get an extra 15 Mpc with squeezing on, so I'm un-monitoring these channels for now and going back to Observing.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 05:16, Friday 17 May 2019 (49302)

This doesn't look like it is caused by the power stabilization servo (even so it is railed). This is related to the TTFSS. More likely a laser related readback is close to its limit and trips the laser auto-locker. Look at the error flags of the squeezer laser auto-locker to determine which sensor might be responsible.

Was alog 49181 ever un done?

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:26, Friday 17 May 2019 (49306)SQZ

Looking at the Laser Auto Locker medm, I see the autolocker is OFF, and we have the following error:

"Fiber trans PD Error" (screenshot attached).

In an alog search, I see that there were waveplate adjustments on Maintenance by Sheila (alog 49237).

Ops Note:  Will we want to re-monitor the squeezer channels Niko notes above at some point?

Images attached to this comment
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 14:50, Friday 17 May 2019 (49313)SQZ

OK, after chatting with commissioners and emails from Daniel, wanted to give an update.

Issue appears to have fixed itself after the RefCav touch up by Jason.  So undid what has been done for this last night & alog 49181 on Daniel's request:

  1. High Power Limit returned to 0.03 (Sheila already did this.  see attached)
  2. Re-enabled HiLo (see attached)
  3. Monitored 3-channels Niko unmonitored on CS_ECAT_PLC4:  H1:SQZ-FIBR_SERVO_COMGAIN, H1:SQZ-FIBR_SERVO_FASTGAIN, and H1:SQZ-FIBR_LOCK_TEMPERATURECONTROLS_ON.
Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 41021-41040 of 88881.Go to page Start 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 End