Displaying reports 42421-42440 of 88703.Go to page Start 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 End
Reports until 06:25, Wednesday 20 March 2019
H1 TCS
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:25, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47713)
Adjusted CO2Y Calibration

The TCS power guardian was having to consistently readjust, the tell tell sign that the calibration needs updating. I brought H1:TCS-ITMY_CO2_LASERPOWER_POWER_IN from 5.2 to 4.8 and that seemed to do the trick.

Dan put in custom mask #1 instead of the normal central heating mask, and I believe that the power monitor channel is after the mask. If this is true it would make sense that we would have to update the calibration then.

H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:52, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47712)
Lockloss 1125 UTC

ETMX has been saturating for the last 20min and thought the control signals FOM looked normal, the DARM BLRMS looked awful. I suspected that this was due to the P2L and Y2L gain changes that I was warned about before commissioners left, so I tried bring them closer to their original values but it didn't seem to help much.

H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:29, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47710)
Observing at 07:19 UTC
H1 GRD
georgia.mansell@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:24, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47709)
SQZ SDF diff

There was an SDF diff in the squeezer: nominally the SHG power servo is on, in this lock it was off, I am not sure why. Accepted the change, left the power servo off.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:07, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47707)
Ops Owl Shift Transition

TITLE: 03/20 Owl Shift: 07:00-15:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Travis
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 4mph Gusts, 3mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.22 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Calm environment, at low noise, commissioners here working out the kinks.

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47705)
Ops Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 03/20 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY:  PEM injections preventing us from going to Observing for first half of shift.  Currently sitting at NLN, but unable to go to Observing due to Guardian ISC_LOCK/ALIGN_IFO management confusion.  Commissioners working on a fix.
LOG: See previous aLogs.

H1 GRD
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:54, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47706)
ALIGN_IFO, ISC_LOCK, SQZ_MANAGER

We couldn't go into observation because ALIGN_IFO and ISC_LOCK were having disagreements about who was managing SQZ_MANAGER and complaining one was stolen by the other.

I removed SQZ_MANAGER from ALIGN_IFO line 40:

          node_list = sus_nodes + ['SQZ_MANAGER']

I reloaded and then all the warnings went away. I then put it back in, reloaded, and everything was fine.

H1 ISC
dick.gustafson@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:46, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47704)
STUDY OF LEAKED RF CONTROL ELECTRONICS TO INDUCED IFO DARM LINES: RF induced Noise.
DickG, MarcP

RF Noise    via CER TO ISC RACK CONTROL ELECTRONICS cabling:  RF= 9.100230 MHZ

For a locked working H1 IFO:
We have measured the coupling of a near RF frequency (pseudo noise) 9.100230 on cable ground..  
noise signal to "DARM"   as seen on control Room aLIGO DARM display.  
We here first try the main 9.100230 Mz cable, looking for a nearby beat "interference" as seen in DARM.
We couple an ISR RF signal at -20 dBV ie .1 Vrms and 9.100230 MHZ + 55 Hz, 65 Hz, and 105 Hz successively.

The coupling is inductive, via a ferrite core + single loop BNC to ISR RF Gen. around the main 
CER to ISC Rack 9.100230 MHz cable;  the cable and loop are thus a 1:1 transformer; a new gadget.
The driven loop plus ferrite induces external shield current at ~ 50 ohm cable level at 0 dBV  ie 1V rms.
The ISR freq was at 9.100285, 9.100295, and 9.100335 MHz.

> A clean 1.3 e-18 m/sqrthz level DARM "noise signal" spike  was seen at 55 Hz, 65 Hz, and 105 Hz 
> for the 3 frequencies  consistent with beating somewhere in the IFO 9.100230 MHz control detection systems.

>> The IFO tolerated a 'visible' noise signal...stayed locked.

We expect a ground noise signal on one cable gets shared amoungst all of the CER to ISC cables.
The transformer stratagem for driving or detecting on cable promises to make possible finding and curing 
the sources and leaks in our large  and imperfect system.
 
>>> The ferrite cable xfmr coupled to an RF Anal or source   is a good cable ground current noise diagnostic.

We expect to map out and understand the cable and module cross couplings, sources, and leaks; 
and perhaps control module negative features, 
and propose cures, fixes.
H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:27, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47703)
Lockloss at 5:02 UTC

Working on relocking such that we can finally go to Observe now that all scheduled injections are complete for the night.

H1 AOS
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:50, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47702)
4 hours of PEM injections

UTC 00:40 to 04:40

Tonight we made acoustic and magnetic injections at the Y-end station. We still have shaker injections to do there, but we completed the first round of speaker and coil injections at EY.

H1 ISC (ISC)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:39, Tuesday 19 March 2019 - last comment - 15:35, Wednesday 20 March 2019(47701)
AWG_LINES guardian created
Dan Brown has created a script which starts and stops the frequency and intensity noise lines 47636.  Unfortunately, with this script the rest of the commissioning team did not have control over the lines.

Today I made a guardian called AWG_LINES out of his script.  It's in /opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/h1/guardian/AWG_LINES.py.

All it does is turn off and on the lines while correctly starting, stopping, and clearing the injection testpoints. 
 
There are two states that matter: IDLE and INJECTING.  
IDLE is nominal, no injections are enabled, and this is the start this guardian should be in during observing.  
INJECTING should have all the lines enabled, and is good for our commissioning tasks right now.  I will set up ISC_LOCK such that the lines are turned on in NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE.  This will have to be changed for the run.  I haven't had a chance to properly vet this guardian so I am leaving it out for now.
More lines can be added to the SET_UP_INJECTIONS state if desired.

EDIT: I just tested this guardian, it works as expected.  Now ISC_LOCK requests 'INJECTING' every time it reaches NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE.
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 06:57, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47714)

The injections were still going as TJ was trying to lock after his lockloss. For now, I have turned off the excitation enable buttons, but the guardian is still trying to send in the lines.

The AWG_LINES guardian didn't go through its STOP_INJECTING state when we lost lock, although TJ has checked that the loaded version of the ISC_LOCK guardian should have requested it to do so.

I forced the AWG_LINES guardian to go through STOP_INJECTING a few times, and it looks like it was happy to clear the LSC output matrix element (it also should have turned off some enable buttons, but I already had those off).  I ask it to log what awgs it thinks it is running, and it thinks that there are no lines left alive.  However, there certainly are lines still alive. 

For now, with the excitation inputs disabled, we should be okay.  I have also commented out of NomLowNoise the command to have the new guardian start sending in lines.  We need this guardian to be checked, including the stopping of injections, before we let it back in to ISC_LOCK.

Operators - If you are having trouble locking, the symptom of these injections is that you can lock DRMI fine, but you can't get to RF_DARM.  If that's true, copy the following 3 lines into a terminal:

  • cdsutils write LSC-MOD_RF9_AM_EXCITATIONEN 0
  • cdsutils write LSC-REFL_SERVO_COMEXCEN 0
  • cdsutils write PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_EXCITATION_GAIN 0
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - 15:35, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47721)
The problem is with reloading this guardian.  I had reloaded in the INJECTING state, which dumped our global variable containing the open awgs.  Then STOP_INJECTING was run, but did nothing because the awgs variable was empty.  
I am working with Jaime to solve this issue.  In the meantime, use Jenne's commands above to mitigate the lines, or rerun IDLE -> SET_UP_INJECTIONS -> INJECTING every time there's a reload. (this will reset the testpoints)
H1 ISC (ISC)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:31, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47699)
POP18 Demod Lonom SDF diff

Accepted the SDF diff shown in the screenshot.  Sheila was unaware of when or why this changed, so advised me to just document and accept.

Images attached to this report
H1 CAL (CAL)
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:27, Tuesday 19 March 2019 - last comment - 20:37, Tuesday 19 March 2019(47696)
Accepting PCal SDF diffs

I'm assuming these changes were made purposefully during the PCal maintenance tune-ups today.  Screenshots attached for posterity.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
richard.savage@LIGO.ORG - 20:37, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47700)

Yes, intentional.  Should be (we should have) accepted in SDF.

 

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:17, Tuesday 19 March 2019 - last comment - 20:29, Tuesday 19 March 2019(47694)
3.1 Hz instability in DHARD P

We saw a big 3.1 Hz instability in DHARD P (and other loops) a few minutes after getting to low noise in our second lock today.  We were constantly saturating ETMX PUM, and the rage dropped.  This seems similar to a problem seen at LLO (maybe 42442, I'm not sure if  43785 is related as well).  

We stepped down the output matrix elements that send DHARD P to the ITMs, and that made things better although the oscillation and saturations continued.  Once we engaged the ADS loops and the converged things got better.  For now we still have DHARD P sent to the ETMs only, because Anamaria told us that is what LLO is doing for this problem.  

We are hoping that this was a cross coupling due to our spot positions being way off for ADS, so we are hoping that for the next few locks we can try to wait and make sure that ADS is converged a bit before doing low noise ASC.  

Comments related to this report
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - 20:29, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47697)

Accepting SDF diffs related to this change.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:23, Tuesday 19 March 2019 - last comment - 20:29, Tuesday 19 March 2019(47680)
Status after Tuesday Maint session today

No alogs from today yet state the situation, so here is the current status - we're still recovering from Tuesday Maint currently locked in Low Noise, however we have a bit of a mess to work through.

The LSC computer was glitched this morning at 9am when EE rack fan isolation work was taking place.  CALINJ is now red out of nominal (OFF). Dave brought the LSC back up (details below eventually), then numerous activities took place as per the morning plan:

- PCAL maint checks at both EY and EX

- Fan isolation in corner LSC and ASC racks, EX and EY ISC racks

- IMC board work by Daniel

- Charge measurements of ETMX

- DAQ/EDCU work by Dave

- 1Hz comb troubleshooting - no alogs to report anything on this yet

- Minor PMC and REFCAV alignment tuneup

- PSL REFCAV EOM driver cable swap

However, once back up at ~3pm local, major noise was present and we saw numerous SDF settings changes in the OBSERVE file (which was clean during the locking last night) mostly related to the OMC (from LSC model).  These were probably settings not saved correctly to the SAFE SDF file and then hung around through the locking to low noise.  Sheila has just attempted to walk those back by hand but the lock blew.  Back to locking now.

PEM was supposed to have some time today, however the maintenance/relocking went long, so they will attempt to work for a few more hours while yielding some hour long segments for OBS MODE starting later in the evening.  Slow thermal TCS tuning may also resume while in OBS MODE overnight, similar to last night.

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 19:03, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47693)

Yesterday we updated many OBSERVE.snaps in order to get to oberseving, but we didn't have a chance to do a similar cleaning up of safe.snaps before this morning's glitch which took down some computers as Betsy says.  
Jenne and I updated a handful of things that we fixed by hand in the safe.snaps, but we need to take a bit of time in the "DOWN" state after a lockloss to update the safe.snaps to prevent these problems in the future. 

betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 20:29, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47698)

We'll mobilize to get some help on this in the next day or so. No more unexpected crashes tho, right!? Famous last words.

H1 ISC
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:12, Tuesday 19 March 2019 - last comment - 18:21, Wednesday 20 March 2019(47656)
Some coherences

BruCo scan here for last night lock: https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~gabriele.vajente/bruco_lho_1237033818/

Some highlights:

 

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 10:37, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47660)

We should check in on this again for our next lock, before we try any TCS tuning, but for at least one lock from yesterday afternoon, there is much less coherence with INP1. 

DanB points out that this time is right near a TCS CO2 power change, and the IFO was cooling down a bit, so perhaps the ASC was following in a weird way.  On the other hand, I've been suspicious about that particular frequency region for a while - some locks it seems high, while other locks it seems low.

There is a 2Hz cutoff in the INP1 ASC loops, but at higher frequency the suppression is only 40dB.  So, probably we should take a quick measurement of these loops and add some more aggressive cutoffs just in case.

terra.hardwick@LIGO.ORG - 18:42, Tuesday 19 March 2019 (47692)

The 480 Hz is a jitter peak (ID'd by Robert here and damped here); the WFS are our best witness of jitter. I had a look at a non peak time (16/03 18:00) and a peak time (19/03 11:30) and the WFS see no difference in the 476 Hz peak, suggesting a coupling change.

Images attached to this comment
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 18:21, Wednesday 20 March 2019 (47725)

Maybe I take my statement about lower coherence with INP1 back.  For several locks, even in the absence of any TCS work, we have modest coherence with INP1.  I have modified the cutoffs, see alog 47726.

Displaying reports 42421-42440 of 88703.Go to page Start 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 End