Displaying reports 44201-44220 of 88541.Go to page Start 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 End
Reports until 23:08, Monday 03 December 2018
H1 TCS (TCS)
daniel.vander-hyde@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:08, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 17:44, Tuesday 04 December 2018(45673)
ITMX HWS adjustments (More picoing and 800nm bandpass added)

Dan B. , Danny V.  

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 10:54, Tuesday 04 December 2018 (45676)

Can you add the product number of the bandpass filter than you've added?

daniel.vander-hyde@LIGO.ORG - 17:44, Tuesday 04 December 2018 (45697)TCS

Hey Aidan, 

Bandpass product number:  FB800-40

1064nm notch filter product number: NF1064-44

H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:23, Monday 03 December 2018 (45671)
POWER UP attempt - more luck in nominal lownoise

- To power to 30W, we turned off the 'BOOSTS' (FM5 in DHARD P&Y and FM3 in CHARD P, labeled 'boost10W').

- Turned ISS 2nd loop off and back on with AC coupling (ISS_ON).

- Stepped up to 30W nominal  lownoise configuration.

- Stepped up the RP compensation gains to 1.6 at 30W (same sign as ASC control)

- We lost it on a simple SRC ASC yaw runaway (most likely SRC1 Y).

- We got a good range reading (with good calibration lines) at 25W - 85Mpc.

H1 ISC (ISC)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:39, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 20:13, Tuesday 04 December 2018(45669)
First look at REFL A and B demod phase and spectrum

After Fil and I swapped the REFL_B cable (alog 45652) I connected LSC-EXTRA_AO_2_EXC to IFO REFL CM board EXC and injected frequency noise in ENGAGE_DC_VIOLIN (2W) to see the demod phase of REFL_B and REFL_A.

First attachment shows the Q/I ratio obtained from the frequency noise scan. Top right shows the demod phase "error" obtained by p=atan(Q/I). Apparently REFL_A demod phase is decent, REFL_B is not terrible but could be improved.

Demod phase error should be flat but it isn't, it seems to cross zero at around 100Hz for REFL_A (maybe the demod phase was set using 100Hz excitation?). HOM or something else, regardless of the cause, this seems to mean that if we optimize the demod phase at f>300Hz there's some I-Q mixing in f<80Hz or so, and vice versa. Since I don't see any real Q signal for f>300Hz but there seems to be some junk for f<100Hz (second attachment), we might be better off optimizing at low frequency.

Not too much low frequency coherence between REFL_A and B, it's not clear if this comes from demod phase difference. Since we're not using REFL_B for control, from this point on we could rotate B phase digitally.

It's also worth measuring this at high power.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 12:41, Tuesday 04 December 2018 (45679)

H1:LSC-REFL_A_RF9_I_ERR isn't a particular good witness of frequency noise, see alog 45157. H1:LSC-REFL_B_RF9_I_ERR_DQ seems even worse. Not enough whitening? Slew rate limitations?

keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 20:13, Tuesday 04 December 2018 (45698)

OK, indeed REFL_B_RF9_I (green) is limited by the dark noise level (cyan), REFL_A_RF9_I (red) is not as bad as REFL_B but not that great either. At least for REFL_A we can increase the whitening though we might saturate Q phase. These are just readbacks.

Demod phase frequency dependence I don't understand.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:23, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 20:49, Monday 03 December 2018(45665)
daytime work today, new ASC instabilities

Jenne, Hang, Sheila, Stefan

Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 20:46, Monday 03 December 2018 (45668)

The instability that seems to grow most visible in CHARD actually can occur at two different frequencies: 21Hz and 28.8Hz.

The attached plot shows both frequencies going unstable at the same time. The peaks show up in the REFL DC centering loops and REFL9_Q. I could not find them on any OPLEV or whit ness channel.

We tried to lower the CHARD BW by more than x5, and put notches at the 28.8Hz (0.5Hz wide). None of that made any difference, suggesting that CHARD is just an observer of the problem.

We suspect that the MCL cross-over might have something to do with it. It has an incoherent  feature in the transfer function at 29.3Hz. Note that the M2 notch was is off a bit (at 27.45 Hz). We should just disable it. Still that leaves the 21Hz to be explained.

(We once tried to turn off the notch and power up. We only saw the 21Hz instability that time.)

 

Images attached to this comment
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 20:49, Monday 03 December 2018 (45670)

We we lowered the SRC2 PIT and YAW in the Guardian before the PWR-UP to 15 (from 100). Those gains eventually come down to 15 anyway. That seems to have solved the SRC runaway issue.

H1 SUS
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:57, Monday 03 December 2018 (45664)
violin mode changes

ITMY mode 8 used to be damped using - gain and no phase shift, now it is damped with positive gain and no phase shift. 

ITMX mode 9 used to be damped using no phase and + gain, now it is no phase and -gain.  These changes are in gaurdian.  

All of the changes that we have had to violin mode phases are on the ITMs, which makes me wonder if it is possible that changing the ring heater settings could change something about the violins.  

H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:36, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 11:24, Tuesday 04 December 2018(45663)
DC centering 8Hz notches were found on - should be off

Not sure the last time someone tried to run an ASC sensing matrix measurement, but it looks like the script didn't properly turn off the 8Hz notches in the DC centering loops.  I've turned them off.

Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 11:24, Tuesday 04 December 2018 (45677)

Turns out it may not have been the script.  The notch filters being on was accepted in SDF.  I have turned them back off (after the ASC model restart), and accepted this in SDF.

H1 CDS (CDS)
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:58, Monday 03 December 2018 (45660)
DTT somehow swaps measurement test points

I was measuring H1:LSC-REFL_A_RF9 and H1:LSC-REFL_B_RF9 test points this morning (attached left).

It didn't make sense and I went back looking at the corresponding DQ channels at the exact same time (attached right).

As you see, if you believe that the DQ channels are correct, REFL_A were somehow swapped with REFL_B in test points, or vice versa.

I cannot reproduce it now, DQ channels and testpoints do agree with each other now, and they do look similar to DQ channels from this morning, which makes more sense (because REFL_B channels are calibrated in volts/W Volts, REFL_A counts/W counts, so the former should be smaller).

Images attached to this report
H1 TCS (TCS)
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:21, Monday 03 December 2018 (45658)
TCS Chiller Water Level Top-Off

No water was added, both chillers were overfilled/at max

H1 General
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Monday 03 December 2018 (45656)
Shift Summary - Day

TITLE: 12/01 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC

STATE of H1: Commissioning

INCOMING OPERATOR: None

SHIFT SUMMARY:

16:00 (8:00) Start of shift

17:28 (9:28) Karen to EY

17:34 (9:34) Kyle to LVEA -- check on turbo pumps

17:44 (9:44) Kyle out of LVEA

17:45 (9:45) Fil to LVEA -- check illuminator cover on HAM1

18:09 (10:08) Vanessa to EX

18:36 (10:36) Karen leaving EY

18:39 (10:39) Betsy, Travis to MY, grab 3IFO pre-mode cleaner

18:44 (10:44) Gerardo to LVEA - valve in NEG1, NEG2

18:58 (10:58) Gerardo out of LVEA

19:20 (11:20) Betsy, Travis back from MY

19:56 (11:56) Kyle to LVEA - VAC work

20:07 (12:07) Kyle out of LVEA

20:49 (12:49) Karen to MY

21:10 (13:10) Karen leaving MY

21:22 (13:22) Mike, guests to End Stations - tour

21:26 (13:26) Bubba to MY

22:42 (14:42) Travis, Betsy to LVEA -- drop off 3IFO equipment

22:44 (14:44) Jason to LVEA -- grab equipment from oplev cabinet

22:51 (14:51) Jason out of LVEA

22:55 (14:55) Travis, Betsy out of LVEA

23:09 (15:09) Christina, tow truck picking up GSA car

00:00 (16:00) End of shift

H1 CAL (CDS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:55, Monday 03 December 2018 (45654)
PCAL MASTER Front-end Model Bug Fixes
S. Karki, J. Kissel

As sudarshan pointed out last week (see LHO aLOG 45587), there were some bugs / inconsistencies between the recent front-end implementation of the explicit calculation of the PCAL optical efficiencies and force coefficients (calculations described in the appendix of T1800046; implemented in LHO aLOG 44418).

I've fixed the model (new screen shots attached), and have restarted the front-end code for both h1calex and h1caley, both of which use the library part I changed, 
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/models/PCAL_MASTER.mdl
which has been committed to the repo.

The updated screen is also attached, and committed to
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/medm/PCAL_END_FORCE_COEFF.adl
Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:39, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 14:24, Thursday 06 December 2018(45636)
WHAM1 Table Top L4Cs Analog High/Low Gain evaluation

Hugh w/ many thanks to JeffK for super patience schooling.

With the new L4Cs inside the HAM1 Optics Table and the option to run the the interface chassis with an extra 10x gain available, the signals were cast into ADC digitization point voltages and compared to the ADC noise and its saturation level.

Bottom Line: *) These sensor will run with the analog gain in the high state.  *) V1 signal does not look like V2 & V3 below 100mHz.  *) The H1 signal does not look like the vertical sensors, naturally; but, I'm not sure it looks right.

Details:

First plot is the IN1s with LOW analog gain during quiet ground motion.

Calculation is: IN1.cts x ADCv/cts / 44[podpreamp] / 2[sensor chassis gain] / 275v/m/s[L4C cal] / 2pif x zpk(pair(1,45),[0 0],(2pi) ^-1).  This should put the counts to meters.

This looks reasonable when compared to the L4C Noise but happy if anyone looks closer at the details.

The second plot shows the H1 signal (just because it had the largest signal) while the sensor interface was in low gain cast back to volts at the ADC.  Periods of quiet ground motion and during a 6.0 EQ in Columbia are shown.  This is not too big an earthquake for us at LHO with the 30-100mHz BLRMS hitting just 1500nm/sec.  Also on the plot are the L4C noise curve when in low gain, the ADC Noise, and the ADC saturation level comparable to the DTT effective noise BW.  Note where the sensor's curve dances with the ADC Noise curve.

The third plot shows similar to above except the sensor interface is in high gain and the earthquake is the very large 7.0 in Alaska pushing the LHO ground motion to 30000 nm/sec in the low band.

So, conclusion: In low gain, the L4C is limited by the ADC noise at low and high frequencies; and, in high gain, there is still 2 orders of magnitude of headroom before saturation even during very large ground motion.  Conclusion, run in high gain.

These data and the matlab script resides in /ligo/home/hugh.radkins/Matlab/HAM1_TT

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 14:24, Thursday 06 December 2018 (45746)

The first plot above has an error, thanks to JeffK for pointing out something I should not have shrugged off.  When the sensor curves dip below the sensor noise curve should be a jab to look closer, as Jeff did.  The Noise curve is incorrect in that it is the case of high analog gain.  Here below I attach the same but with the low analog gain L4C noise and the ADC noise curves.  As Jeff and I had seen before, in this state, the ADC noise limits the sensor signals.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CAL (CDS, DetChar)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:13, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 18:50, Monday 03 December 2018(45653)
H1 PCALX Temperature Sensors Broken
J Kissel, N. Lecoeuche

While glancing at the PCAL END station overview screens, we noticed that the PCALX screen words "STATUS" and "Pcal modules are not powered" were blinking rapidly. The channels that this status indicator are measuring are:
    "Pcal modules are not powered"
        H1:CAL-PCALX_LASERENABLE 
        H1:CAL-PCALX_LASERPOWERCONTROL 
        H1:CAL-PCALX_SHUTTERSTATUS  
        H1:CAL-PCALX_LASERDIODECURRENT
    "STATUS"
        H1:CAL-PCALX_TRANSMITTERMODULETEMPERATURE 
        H1:CAL-PCALX_RECEIVERMODULETEMPERATURE

While the "Pcal modules are not powered" channels are flat and unchanging -- and the same as PCALY -- we found that the "STATUS" channels, i.e. the temperature sensor channels, were reporting a wildly oscillating temperature from 0 to 20 deg Celsius, with a ~1 sec period. 

This junk has apparently been happening since Sunday Nov 11 2018 (~a month ago) at 23:38:56 UTC (Nov 11 2018 15:38:56 PST).

Attached are screenshots of when the failure happened, and how the sensor outputs currently look.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - 15:26, Monday 03 December 2018 (45655)

Opened FRS-11921

richard.mccarthy@LIGO.ORG - 18:50, Monday 03 December 2018 (45666)

This is a known issue.  The parts have been ordered to fix this.  I will mark FRS as duplicate.  It is in the chassis not the readback chain.

https://services.ligo-la.caltech.edu/FRS/show_bug.cgi?id=10987

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:49, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 09:34, Tuesday 04 December 2018(45641)
Incoming updates to BSC-ISI and SEIPROC models

Tomorrow there will be a big update to the BSC-ISI and SEIPROC models. This is mostly to get code to smoothly ramp between different sensor correction filters and get the ground common mode signals into the ISIs. The former should make it smoother to switch between different seismic configurations. The latter is an attempt to improve isolation and reduce drives during earthquakes, something seismic group has talked about for a while.

Part of this update will include a simplification to how the ground sensor calibration and distribution is done. Currently all of the corner ISIs receive the 3 STS2s from a distribution chassis, and each chamber applies the same calibrations on all 9 channels. The update will use the ITMY ISI to send the uncalibrated signals to the SEIPROC model, which will do the calibration, then send that calibrated signal back out the ISIs. SEIPROC will also take over the BLRMS channel calculations.

I'm documenting what I had to do for the corner station ISIs here.

First screen shot, for ITMY I removed and the top level ground block which did the calculation of the ISI-GND_STS_HAM2/HAM5/ITMY calibrated STS channels. This block got moved to SEIPROC.

Second screenshot is the update to ITMY ground in. The green STS tag connect the adc inputs through a bus to IPC channels, of the form H1:ISI-ITMY_A_GND_X_IPC_PCIE, these go out to the SEIPROC model. The calibrated IPCs come in to the STS_CAL tag, the common mode signals come in on the CM_GND tag. Current all of the BSC models are set up to just use the ITMY STS (connected to the STS_CAL tag), but it might be a good idea to use some version of the current STS sensing matrix so that we can change which STS we use for feed forward on the fly by changing an epics variable. Both the STS_CAL tag and CM_GND go into the master model to the  h1isiitmy ITMY ST1 SENSCOR DOF block, contents shown in the third screen shot. This uses the code outlined in T1800414. There is also a new isi master part, the inputs are mostly the same, but there are fewer outputs because there is now need to ouptut the STS signals on the top level.

Fourth screenshot shows the uncalibrated IPC channels coming into the SEIPROC model, fifth shows the new, topnamed ISI block for the generation of the calibrated ground signals. This preserves the ISI-GND_STS channel names, so should not affect anyone who uses these channels. The signals are calibrated using mostly the same stuff that the ITMY model used, and include the BLRMS calculations, shown in the sixth screenshot. I will probably have to make a new MEDM to access the STS calibrations, though.

This update also applies to the endstations, but the STS calibration is done in a block added to the top level. I added this block a couple weeks ago, which required deleting a block like ITMY and stuff on the top level for the BRS subtraction, then wiring up a new block that organized it all in a library part. This change is shown in the seventh screenshot. The endstation ISIs are also getting the common mode signals from the corner.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 16:07, Monday 03 December 2018 (45657)

The HAM-ISI models now also have this update ready to go, it's a bit simpler to install. The BSCs will get installed & restarted tomorrow, the HAM and HEPI  updates will go in next week.

jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - 09:34, Tuesday 04 December 2018 (45675)

I forgot to add filter banks to allow for calibration of the STS signals in the SEIPROC model. Those are in now, the banks will be of the form H1:ISI-GND_STS_HAM2/ITMY/HAM5_X/Y/Z_CAL (I just realized that BrianL had already created some screens I could reuse if I was smarter, and used channel names like H1:ISI-GND_STS_HAM2/ITMY/HAM5_INF_X/Y/X). After Dave restarts the h1oaf, I'll make an screen to make the interaction with these banks easy.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS
yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:38, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 16:22, Monday 03 December 2018(45648)
New IMC drive align gains

After running a2l_min_IMC.py, the new IMC drive align gains are:

MC1-P2L:  -0.212     MC1-Y2L: -0.589

MC2-P2L: +0.485     MC2-Y2L: -0.572

MC3-P2L:  -0.345     MC3-Y2L: -0.594

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 13:07, Monday 03 December 2018 (45650)

IMC centering

mc1 p   0.43
mc1 y   1.19
mc2 p   -0.98
mc2 y   1.15
mc3 p   0.69
mc3 y   1.20

- Cheryl, Niko

yannick.lecoeuche@LIGO.ORG - 14:43, Monday 03 December 2018 (45651)

IMC centering units are in mm

patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 16:22, Monday 03 December 2018 (45659)
Accepted differences in SDF for MC3. Screenshot attached.
Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:34, Monday 03 December 2018 - last comment - 17:32, Monday 03 December 2018(45642)
RGA data before & after valving in two corner NEG pumps

RGA text file attached with scans before-during-after valving in last two NEG pumps in corner station (NEGs within several feet of RGA). Gerardo will note the times that he valved in each pump in order to correspond to RGA scans. We were looking for changes in H2 partial pressure but didn't see much change by simply eye-balling the RGA scan; attached is PDF of scan after pumps valved in - H2 partial pressure was at ~ 1e-7 A before and after.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 12:09, Monday 03 December 2018 (45644)VE

NEG2 and NEG1 valved in around 18:52 utc, and NEG2 was valved in first.

gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 17:32, Monday 03 December 2018 (45662)VE

Plot comparing LVEA RGA scans before and after the NEG pumps were valved in.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
koji.arai@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:12, Tuesday 02 August 2016 - last comment - 17:04, Monday 03 December 2018(28807)
3rd OMC preparations

[Betsy, Koji] @Bonding lab

The OMC is sit in the bonding lab for curing of the epoxy. Otherwise, it is ready to be moved to the chamber side.

- 3rd OMC optics cleaning

Attachment 1:
We applied FirstContact cleaning of the optical surfaces. The optical side of the breadboard was wiped with IPA-soaked cloth (without touchting the optics).
The FCs will be left until the OMC is brought to the chamber side.

- PD replacement

Attachment 2:
The original OMC DCPDs were replaced with the new high QE DCPDs. The PDs at the BS transmission and reflection sides are from the PD cage A slot 3 (A3) and A4, respectively. They correspodns to the PD serials B1-01 and B1-16. The final testing at Caltech showed the QEs of 0.980 and 0.981 respectively.

The FirstContact seals are attached on the PD apertures to prevent particulates come into the PD surfaces.

- Mounting blacket bonding reinforcement

Attachment 3:
We added a glass prism to reinforce the bonding of one of the mounting blackets on the top (suspension) side of the OMC breadboard. A small amount of glue residue form the existing bond was removed by a razor blade to clean the place for the new prism. As small amount of glue as possible was applied to have round glue foot print, particularly on the glass-glass joint. The glue on the Invar-glass joint looks round. The glue on the glass-glass joint looks square inspite of our effort (We really don't think it is an issue). A steel block was added to hold the prism until the epoxy is cured.

 

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 17:04, Monday 03 December 2018 (45661)
The test data for B1-01 (DCPDA, that in transmission of the OMC TRANS BS) and B1-16 (DCPDB, that in reflection of the OMC TRANS BS) can be found here in the 40m eLOG 255:
    https://nodus.ligo.caltech.edu:8081/OMC_Lab/255

The serial numbers are indicated in the OMC DCPD wiring chain,
    D1300502
Displaying reports 44201-44220 of 88541.Go to page Start 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 End