Displaying reports 44241-44260 of 88488.Go to page Start 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 End
Reports until 10:39, Thursday 29 November 2018
LHO VE (CDS, VE)
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:39, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45576)
Degas of PT191 and PT192
Patrick, Gerardo

Ran the degas command through Beckhoff for both PT191 and PT192.

Started PT191 at 18:15 UTC. Turned off at 18:20 UTC.
Started PT192 at 18:23 UTC. Turned off at 18:28:35 UTC.

The trends appear to confirm the statement in the manual that the process runs for three minutes and then automatically turns off.
H1 ISC (ISC, SEI)
hang.yu@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:38, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45575)
CPSFF not working

Jenne, Hang

Since the microseismic was high these days, we quickly checked that if the CPS FF to reduce the MICH motion was still working. The conclusion was NO...

While it worked 3 yrs ago (LHO:24134), currently it only injected a large amount of noise to the system. In the attached spectra, the blue traces were without the CPS FF, and the red ones were with the CPSFF on.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:03, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45570)
Ops Day Shift Transition
Ops Shift Transition: 11/29/2018, Day Shift 16:00 – 00:00 (08:00 -16:00) - UTC (PT)
State of H1: Unlocked – Relocking and general commissioning   
Intent Bit: Commissioning
Weather: Mostly overcast, winds are a Light to Gentle breeze, no precipitation forecast, with temperatures in the 40s  
Primary 0.03 – 0.1Hz: X
Secondary 0.1 – 0.3Hz: X
Outgoing Operator: N/A
Quick Summary: Commissioning work
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:44, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45568)
FSS mixer monitor signal
Following on from yesterday ... 

    This morning the measured front panel voltage for the mixer monitor signal was consistent with that displayed
by the MEDM screen.  Whereas yesterday it was not.

    Deferring this for now to a Tuesday maintenance period.



  Richard / Peter
H1 SQZ (SQZ)
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:54, Wednesday 28 November 2018 - last comment - 08:35, Thursday 29 November 2018(45567)
Post-vent squeezing

Sheila, Haocun, Daniel, Terry, Nutsinee 

~5dB squeezing, ~8.5 dB anti-squeezing, NLG ~7

Green power was drifting slowly when we were taking the measurement so could be better. OPO locking crapped out just after we took the data so we didn't have more tonight. Haocun is working on the loss estimate. More recovery alog to follow. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 07:31, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45569)

Nice recovery, congratulations on your 5 dBs!

Let's wait for Haocun's analysis, but a quick check suggests that the sqz/anti-sqz numbers are not consistent with the NLG of 7. Getting 8.5dB of anti-sqz with NLG=7 requires huge loss, which would make impossible to achieve 5 dB of sqz. 

nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 08:35, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45572)

I agree. Sadly we measured anti squeezing first when the input power to the coupler was ~18-19mW. By the time we get to measuring the squeezing the power dropped by at least a mW. More data is needed. 

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:23, Wednesday 28 November 2018 - last comment - 17:39, Friday 30 November 2018(45566)
something is wrong with the ISS (second loop) disabled for now

We had a problem with the ISS tonight, which was probably caused by the second loop.  We haven't taken the time to look into it but have disabled the second loop by turning off the input H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_ENABLE, which made first loop stop railing.  Attached is a screenshot. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 18:25, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45589)

One problem was found and fixed. Feed forward of AC coupling was suspected at first but turned out to be OK, but I adjusted it anyway.

1. Slow offset servo was super aggressive.

The main problem was that the output matrix element for diffraction part of the slow offset servo H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_REFERENCE_IN_MTRX_1_4 was set on Oct/23 to be a huge number (0.5). Behavior of the main ISS part of the 2nd loop is dependent on the offset servo's behavior at and below its UGF, and you don't want to set it super aggressive or you might suffer when there's a slight change in the main ISS part.

This loop is there to bring the diffraction back to a pre-defined number (-1*H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_REFERENCE_DFR_CAL_OFFSET) VERY slowly, but the gain of 0.5 is like the UGF of 0.1Hz-ish and that's really too much. Even when I reduced this from 0.5 to 0.15 there was a clear gain peaking. I set it to 0.05.

(But this number was 5e-5 before, which is overly small.)

Also, I set H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_AC_COUPLING_OFFSET to 2 so the diffraction becomes about 2.3 with AC coupling ON but without slow offset servo.

Finally, 10Hz pole of this path was off (H1:PSL-ISS_THIRDLOOP_POLE) and I switched it ON because we're not really doing anything at around 1Hz and faster.
2. Feed forward path of AC coupling.

Since PSL commissioning/maintenance, ISS 1st loop diode power level dropped by about 15% though the IMC in and transmission only dropped by 10% or so. This is OK, but I was annoyed that H1:PSL-ISS_PD_NORM_OUT was about 0.84 because if the power decreases by another 5% and it will hit the lower limit of 0.8.

I changed FM2 of H1:PSL-ISS_PD_NORM so the output becomes close to 1.

Images attached to this comment
daniel.brown@LIGO.ORG - 17:22, Friday 30 November 2018 (45602)

We enabled the ISS second loop again and we found that it started ringing up again. At -120s I switched it off, guardian switched it back on again around -80. We disabled it again.

Images attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 17:39, Friday 30 November 2018 (45603)

That's because my changes were reverted back by something. Especially H1:PSL-ISS_SECONDLOOP_REFERENCE_IN_MTRX_1_4 was back to 0.5 again.

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:03, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45565)
interferometer locking, some DRMI/ PRMI comparisons

Thomas, Georgia, Dan Brown, Craig, Sheila, Jenne

We have been able to lock PRMI and DRMI without the arms, and PRMI with the arms, so weve made a comparison of some parameters between the configurations.  Edit: In the first version of this table, I was not consistent in using the normalized and unnormalized values of POP18.  The trigger is based on the un-normalized channel, so I will use these values here.  We have been using 1.9W of input power for acquisition.  Also note that the gains I have written here are the gains used once we have locked, some of the acquisition gains are different. 

  PRMI no arms (POP18 = 30  counts) PRMI with arms (POP18 = 55 counts)
  trigger on FM trigger digital gain  ugf trigger on  FM trigger digital gain

ugf

MICH 8 (26%) 24 2.8 ~4Hz 8 (14%) 48 3.2 8 Hz
PRCL     10 ~45Hz     5 30 Hz
  DRMI no arms (POP18 = 40 counts) DRMI with arms POP 18 = 147
MICH 20 (50%) 24 3 12Hz 37 (25%) 37 2.8 12 Hz
PRCL     18 90 Hz   3.5 8 70 Hz
SRCL 10 (25%)   -33 50 Hz 37 (25%)   -18 42 Hz

 

The main thing to note is that the optical gain of MICH increased by a factor of 2.8 between PRMI and DRMI without the arms, and was similar to DRMI without arms in the PRMI with arms configuration.  Based on this we guessed that the MICH gain might be too high with our normal settings (which used to work), and have reduced the MICH acquire gain for DRMI with arms from 3 to 1, which has given us several locks of a few seconds. for PRCL, there is not much of a change in optical gain between DRMI and PRMI and for PRMI with and without the arms.  It is also interesting that we are able to acquire with rather different triggering configurations in terms of the percentage of the locked POP 18 build up.  

In PRMI with the arms we are currently not able to get a build up of more than 60 in POP 18 counts, which before the vent Hang found that we had about 70 counts.  All of this can be compared to the information in 44348, when DRMI acquisition was working better. 

With PRMI locked and the arms held off resonance by ALS, Georgia centered the beams on POPAIRB, REFLAIR A and REFLAIR B.  (this POPAIR B had been done since the ISCT1 move but not the refl air diodes).  The other main change since the vent is the TCS preloading 45341 and 45523.  THe other thing to note is that today we have no wind and microseism around 0.4 um/ second, which is a little high for Hanford but we have been able to lock in these conditions in the past. 

We have been able to lock DRMI several times, although it seems to be very sensitive to alignment.  We were able to transition to 3F, but lost lock when transitioning the BS ASC from 45 to 36 twice in a row.  

The next time DRMI locked we skipped OFFLOAD_DRMI_ASC.  The shutter guardian said that it failed it's test, so we ran the test manually and it passed. 

Craig changed the ANALOG_CARM state to compensate for the factor of 2 less gain after the second photo diode was added by adding 6dB of gain in the summing junction. 

We arrived on resonance with a recycling gain of 41 without any ASC other than DHARD, and manually engaged AS36 to BS loops.  We stepped through the ENGAGE_REFL_POP_WFS step which was fine until we tried to engage PRC1 (POP QPD to PRM loop) which unlocked the interferometer. 

H1 ISC (CAL)
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:48, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45563)
DARM offloading to L1 & L2 stages: acquisition vs. low noise

In our runup to O3, we have been using the ESD on ETMX for both acquisition and low noise operation.  When we do the transition from acquisition to lownoise, we move all actuation away from ETMX.  In O1 and O2, this meant that we just moved all the actuation (L1, L2, L3) to ETMY, which was already setup for lownoise.  Now, we move L1 and L2 to ETMY, but the L3 actuation over to ITMX.  ETMX's ESD driver gets some analog switching, then we move the L3 actuation back to ETMX.  However, we have been leaving the L1 and L2 actuation on ETMY. 

Part of the reasoning for leaving the L1 and L2 actuation on ETMY was that we had hoped we'd be able to fix and use the ETMY ESD, and just go entirely back to the O2 sequence with all lownoise DARM actuation on ETMY.  This would save some calibration measurements from needing to be redone.  However, we will be using ETMX's ESD for O3, so it seems sensible to have all of the DARM actuation on ETMX. 

To this end, I have looked at the differences in actuation on the L1 and L2 stages between acquisition and lownoise, and determined that we already have all of the necessary filters installed on ETMX, just in a different order than they are installed on ETMY.  I have set up a choice flag in the LOWNOISE_ESD_ETMX state where we can choose whether to move the L1 and L2 actuation back to ETMX, or leave it on ETMY.  If the flag is set to False (which it is currently), then everything will stay as it has been.  If the flag is changed to True, then ETMX's L1 and L2 LOCK_L filter banks will be set up to look like the ETMY banks, and then all DARM actuation will be put back to ETMX at the end of the state (not leaving some on ETMY).  The ALS_DIFF state resets the ETMX L1 and L2 stages for acquisition.

Since I have not yet tested this, the choice flag is left False for now, so that no settings will actually change. Once we're able to relock, we'll try a transition with the final actuation only being ETMX.

The attachment shows the difference in filters for acquisition vs. low noise for the L1 stages.  The L2 stage difference is just engaging an inverse pendulum filter.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:10, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45562)
NEG3 Valved In

At 01:02 utc NEG3 was valved in to the main vacuum volume.

H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:16, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45561)
Ops Day Shift Summary
Ops Shift Log: 11/28/2018, Day Shift 16:00 – 00:00 (08:00 - 16:00) Time - UTC (PT)
State of H1: Unlocked for post vent commissioning
Intent Bit: Commissioning  
Support: N/A
Incoming Operator: N/A
Shift Summary: Vent recovery and commissioning  
 
Activity Log: Time - UTC (PT)
15:10 (06:10) Peter – Into the PSL enclosure
16:00 (08:00) Start of Shift
16:07 (08:07) Karen – Going into the LVEA for morning cleaning
16:21 (08:21) Peter – Out of the PSL enclosure
16:56 (08:56) Chris – Moving scaffolding from LVEA into the High Bay via roll-up door
16:57 (08:57) Nutsinee – Going to HAM6 area
16:59 (08:59) Vanessa – Going into LVEA for cleaning
17:19 (09:19) Karen – Going to End-Y for cleaning (Set SEI_CONF to WINDY_NO_BRSY)
17:44 (09:44) Vanessa – Going to End-X for cleaning (Set SEI_CONF to VERY_WINDY_NOBRSXY)
17:50 (09:50) Karen – Finished at End-Y – Going to Mid-Y
18:01 (10:01) Richard – Going into the CER
18:08 (10:08) Karen – Finished at Mid-Y
18:17 (10:17) Vanessa – Finished at End-X (Set SEI_CONF back to WINDY)
18:33 (10:33) Kyle – Going into the LVEA to check the various pump-down vacuum pumps
18:40 (10:40) Kyle – Out of the LVEA
18:49 (10:49) Gerardo – Going into the LVEA to check the new NAG pumps
18:58 (10:58) Gerardo – Out of the LVEA
19:00 (11:00) Chris – Out of the LVEA
19:27 (11:27) Patrick & Gerardo – De-Gassing NEG-1
19:34 (11:34) Gerardo & Patrick – Finished trying to de-gas NEG-1
19:46 (11:46) Jenne & Nutsinee – Going to ICS racks near the PSL
20:08 (12:08) Jenne & Nutsinee – Out of the LVEA
20:11 (12:11) Richard & Jenne – Going to ICS racks to do some cabling work
20:22 (12:22) Jenne & Richard – Out of the LVEA
21:15 (13:15) Kyle & Gerardo – Going to Mid-Y
21:30 (13:30) Peter – Going into the LVEA to make a measurement
21:40 (13:40) Peter – Out of the LVEA
23:21 (15:21) Nutsinee – Into LVEA to Squeezer table
00:00 (16:00) End of Shift

 

H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:53, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45551)
summary of ALS and alignment work yesterday/this morning

Sheila Thomas Dan Brown Georgia Hang Keita Jenne

Here's a summary of some of the work done yesterday.  

H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:35, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45557)
Upped upper limit of ALS-Y_FIBR_REJECTED PD

The Yarm green locking was complaining about the fiber polarization being too high, even though the rejected percent was 16 with the threshold being 30 (so, 16 being less than 30, it should have been fine).  After some more clicking (opening the fiber pol PD sub-screen from the Yarm PLL screen), I found an error message "power too high".  It looks like we have 0.086 mW but the threshold of too high power was set to be 0.080 mW.  So, I upped the threshold to be 0.09 mW for now so that we can keep working on diagnosing the COMM lack-of-locking situation.

H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:21, Wednesday 28 November 2018 - last comment - 13:47, Wednesday 28 November 2018(45547)
FSS inspection
Following on from Keita's alog entry from yesterday this morning
I looked at the mixer monitor signal.  The MEDM screen screen indicates that the mixer output is typically ~0.5 V.  With a digital
multimeter I measured 1.2 mV when the MEDM screen indicated that the voltage was ~0.7 V.  An oscilloscope trace of the signal
is shown in tp3_1.png.

    CG20FG9.tif shows the measured open loop transfer function from this morning, with the marker placed at the UGF.
The transfer function does not appear as smooth as ones I can recall from before.  Phase margin looks okay.

    Whilst I was in the enclosure, I tweaked the alignment to the reference cavity a little and re-centered the beam
onto the locking photodiode.  The FSS still has some trouble locking even when the transmission voltage indicated on
the MEDM screen exceeds the resonant threshold.  I do not know why this would be, although sometimes either the runtime
model and/or guardian takes over the common gain slider and moves it at what I think is an inappropriate time - like
when there is no light flashing in the reference cavity, for example.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 10:31, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45552)
The discrepancy in the mixer signal is not explained by the schematics of the TTFSS field box.  Next step
is to look at the front panel output of the field box.
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 13:47, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45560)
A few moments ago (~1:35 pm local) I measured the mixer monitor voltage at the front panel of the TTFSS field box.
It measured -0.1 mV.  Coincidentally I looked at the value on the MEDM screen and it reported a value consistent
with the voltmeter.  Pulling up the trend data for the past 10 hours, the mixer voltage dropped close to 0 V since
about 8:10 am local.

    Not sure what caused the big change.
H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:19, Tuesday 27 November 2018 - last comment - 19:17, Sunday 09 December 2018(45534)
'Terminator' terminal emulator bug and work around
I believe I have found a relevant bug report and a work around for various issues using the 'Terminator' terminal emulator program, including:

1. New terminals were placed behind existing terminals.
2. Opening a new terminal on a workspace that did not already have a terminal open on it would move an already existing terminal from another workspace to the workspace that the new terminal was opened on.

The bug report is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/terminator/+bug/1508531

The work around is mentioned in one of the comments. Edit your ~/.config/terminator/config file and add 'dbus=False' under [global_config]. For example:

[global_config]
	dbus=False
[keybindings]
[profiles]
  [[default]]
    scrollback_infinite = True
[layouts]
  [[default]]
    [[[child1]]]
      type = Terminal
      parent = window0
    [[[window0]]]
      type = Window
      parent = ""
[plugins]


This seems to have resolved the issues mentioned above for me.
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 11:00, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45577)

Thanks Patrick, this is a great problem to solve.  Can we add this to everyone's profile by default?

rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 19:17, Sunday 09 December 2018 (45788)

can also solve this by using the "Preferences" option in The Terminator:

  1. right-click on Terminator
  2. find "Preferences"
  3. un-select the DBus server check box
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:03, Tuesday 27 November 2018 - last comment - 08:26, Thursday 29 November 2018(45532)
pressure at corner y-arm

The pressure at PT-124 (just past GV6 along y-arm in LVEA) is the lowest is has been in 10 years. We know of a small leak on GV6 stem flange joint on bonnet plate. I won't read too much into this though knowing many of these cold cathode gauges are originals from iLIGO and out of calibration.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 08:26, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45571)

Could also be a Beckhoff thing creating an offset.

LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:22, Monday 26 November 2018 - last comment - 09:27, Thursday 29 November 2018(45515)
Leak tested new joints on IP2, HAM6 and HAM1

Gerardo M., Kyle R.

Today we helium leak tested the new joints on IP2 between the gate valve and chevron baffle nipple, the chevron baffle nipple and ion pump and both HV feedthroughs.  IP2 was de-energized during testing and was pumped only by the leak detector via flex lines connected to the 1 1/2" pump port.  The helium baseline (background) was < 3 x 10-9 torr*L/sec throughout testing as an audible flow of helium was applied slowly around the joints being tested.  IP2 was later energized and left isolated so as to "dry out" from its recent exposure to air.

For HAM6, only the new 2.75" CFF fiber feedthrough was tested (Fabrice M.).  For this case, the leak detector was used to back the 500 l/s turbo and the helium baseline stayed < 5 x 10-10 torr*L/sec

For HAM1, all 2.75" CFF feedthroughs on the South end were tested using the leak detector to back the 500 L/s turbo.  The helium background stayed < 8 x 10-10 Torr*L/sec throughout.

 

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 09:23, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45573)

On HAM1, TTBOMK, only D6-1 was changed and it is a 4.5" CFF; just saying.

chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 09:27, Thursday 29 November 2018 (45574)

I told them to leak check all because we weren't sure which port that is. It was just as fast to spray He on all vs. hunting you down to point to the flange. :)

H1 CAL (DetChar, INJ, ISC, SUS)
evan.goetz@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:51, Monday 08 October 2018 - last comment - 12:52, Wednesday 28 November 2018(44418)
Front end CAL model changes
Jeff K., Evan G.

ECR: E1800246
IIET: 11305, 5205
Work permit: 7850

We revised and compiled several front end models with several updates to enable compensation for time dependent interferometer parameters, and general clean-up. We list below the changes:

  1) CAL-CS top level model changes:
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/h1/models/h1calcs.mdl
     - Removed DARM_ERR_WHITENED and DARM_CTRL_WHITENED since these are no longer actually whitened and instead are double precision channels
     - Added an IPC receiver from each end station TX PD to the top-level CAL-CS model and piped it in to the CS library part
     - Added new CFTD_DELTAL channels to the frames (CFTD = compensated for time dependence) as parallel channels to the standard DELTAL channels
     - Deleted DARM hardware injections in top level CAL-CS. These were unused
     (Note removing whitened channels and DARM hardware injections saves at least five 16k channels from being saved to frames. We added only two 16k channels and four 4k channels)

  2) PCAL library changes:
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/models/PCAL_MASTER.mdl
     - Removed oscillator line filters because they were unused
     - Removed RX and TX_PD_VOLTS filters and replaced with EPICS and testpoints
     - Implemented computation of optical efficiencies and force coefficients as laid out in T1800046
     - Allowed for different ADC gains and different analog AA filter gains because we care about this in the h(t) calibration at the <0.1% level

  3) Since LHO alog 44319, we have:
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/models/CAL_CS_MASTER.mdl
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/models/CAL_LINE_MONITOR_MASTER.mdl
     - completed the front end computation of the detuned SRC spring frequency and Q (f_s and Q) because we changed the tracking of PUM and UIM stage from a common time dependent scalar to be separately tracked as two time dependent scalars
     - implemented parallel path calculation for on-the-fly compensation for a time-dependent cavity pole frequency
     - added excitation point in QUAD model parallel to the calibration lines so that we make excitations for sweeps at the same point as for the calibration lines that are injected. This allows for easier removal of time-dependent changes in actuation gains so that we can search for unknown systematic errors

  4) In top level PCALEX / PCALEY model:
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/h1/models/h1calex.mdl
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/h1/models/h1caley.mdl
     - added IPC senders of TX PD signals to go to the CAL-CS model

Presentation given to the calibration group (see G1801594) will be updated to reflect these changes.
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 12:52, Wednesday 28 November 2018 (45559)CAL
Here some screenshots of the updates to the PCAL front-end model and MEDM screens updated to more explicitly calculate the force coefficient used in the pcal system.

The screenshots of the simulink model are from the PCAL library part,
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/models/PCAL_MASTER.mdl

The MEDM screen for the newly explicit calculation of the force coefficient can be found from each PCAL overview screen (see 4th image), by following the "Filt. Calibrated" linked screen button (third down from the list of three linked boxes in the upper right corner). The 5th attachment is this new screen (crafted by Evan), and the former old calibration filters can be found linked from this screen in the lower right corner, labeled "SUS m/N."

These screens live in 
    /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/medm/
        PCAL_END.adl
        PCAL_END_FORCE_COEFF.adl
        PCALFastFilterCal.adl

At the moment, all of this new infrastructure is bypassed as shown in the attached screenshots. This is done by setting virtually all the new EPICs records to 1.0, and the cos(	heta) term to be 1/2 * c, such that when the hard-coded speed of light is multiplied in, this previous term cancels it to be 1.0 as well. As such, the TX_PD or RX_PD filters -- which in the new scheme are intended to be only the suspension response (currently in FM6 and FM8 as "susnorm" and "m_per_N") -- still include the O2 force coefficients in FMs 1 and 2 as "cts2V" and "N/V".
Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 44241-44260 of 88488.Go to page Start 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 End