Displaying reports 45201-45220 of 84893.Go to page Start 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 End
Reports until 13:37, Saturday 03 March 2018
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:37, Saturday 03 March 2018 - last comment - 14:57, Saturday 03 March 2018(40829)
Chandra on site

Working at MY. Kyle and Gerardo are my phone buddies.

Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 14:57, Saturday 03 March 2018 (40830)

Removed restrictor plate from return duct. System is circulating full flow now and so far, so good on temperature profiles. We suspect the restricted return flow was not allowing the bottom section of enclosure to heat up enough to match the other zones. Full flow (2000 cfm) compensates for leaks in enclosure. Set point up'ed to 70C+10C error, at 1C/hr ramp rate and 1 hr hold time. We will be back on site tomorrow to check on system and raise set point again. 

I checked on all three purge air systems while on site. EY is running three compressors. EX is running four compressors. All three systems are switching towers. I did not measure D.P. or go in VEAs.

Leaving site now. Will monitor MY closely from home.

H1 CDS (VE)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:47, Saturday 03 March 2018 (40828)
testing rate-of-change system to support CP4 bake-out operations

During CP4's bake-out, we would like to send cell phone alarms if the temperature's rate-of-change exceeds 1degC per hour. I'm testing a python script I wrote yesterday which accumulates data and reports the differences between the current value and those from various times in the past. During the testing phase both the code and its companion EPICS IOC are running on my workstation (zotws6).

H1 PSL (IOO, PSL)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:33, Friday 02 March 2018 (40822)
corrections made to the PMC dog clamps

I modified the dog clamps on 3 of the 4 PMC feet that hold the PMC to the PSL table.  The 4th foot attachment point is located between the ISS and the PMC, and will be addressed at a later date.

For 3 of the 4 feet:

- Cheryl, Matt, Ed

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PEM, PSL)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:04, Friday 02 March 2018 (40826)
cable to accelerometer near the PMC disconnected for PMC dog clamp work

I wanted to note that in order to tighten a couple of the PMC dog clamps, I had to disconnect the cable to the accelerometer that's near the PMC.  The accelerometer appears to be very strongly attached to the PSL table top.  When I went to remove the cable, I found that it wasn't fully secured to the top of the accelerometer, and I don't know if that signal has been having noise issues, but wanted to log that.  The cable is now reconnected and secure.

H1 SEI (SEI)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:27, Friday 02 March 2018 (40825)
H1 ISI CPS Noise Spectra Check - Weekly

State of the ISIs: HAM2-isolated-damped: HAM3-damped: HAM4-damped: HAM5-damped: HAM6-locked: ITMX-damped: ITMY-isolated-damped: BS-damped: ETMX-locked: ETMY-locked.

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:03, Friday 02 March 2018 (40824)
Weekly PSL Chiller Reservoir Top-Off
H1 SQZ
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:33, Friday 02 March 2018 (40823)
green long fiber installed

Terry, Sheila, Nutsinee, Daniel

This afternoon there was a lot of work around HAM6, Terry got a beatnote for the FSS using our temporary laser, Daniel swapped in vac cables (480818), and we installed the new long green fiber that we received from MIT today.  

We are getting about 50% transmission from the fiber.  Before installing it Terry inspected both ends of the fiber using the fiber microscope.  We used only 2.7mW into the fiber. 

H1 PSL
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:55, Friday 02 March 2018 - last comment - 07:04, Saturday 03 March 2018(40821)
PSL 70W Amplifier Installation Update

J. Oberling, E. Merilh, M. Heintze

A frustrating day with little progress.  We started this morning finishing up the setup for the beam caustic measurement.  We installed an iris to block the ASE from the FE, installed a pump light filter to block any 808nm pump light, and installed an 95% output coupler to dump most of the FE beam into a beam dump.  This done, we began the measurement.  It was immediately apparent that the 200mm lens installed in L15 was too much for the Wincam, so we swapped that with a 300mm lens.  We then noticed that we had a very nice LG01 mode instead of the TEM00 mode we expect.  This is very strange, as we would not be able to lock the PMC with the mode out of the FE being that bad, and we had the PMC lock yesterday.  We noticed the beam clipping on the bottom of PBS02 (which could be causing the mode issue), and upon relocking the PMC found that now only 13W was incident on it.  Something in the alignment clearly shifted.  Our first suspect was AMP_PBS01 not looking very secure in its mount, so we removed it, mounted it better and reinstalled it.  We then spent the rest of the day realigning AMP_PBS01 to the PMC.  At the end of this alignment we now have 25.7W incident on the PMC, with 3.6W reflected and 22.1W transmitted.  The beam is still slightly clipping on PBS02, so apparently the new pick-off has changed the launch angle out of the FE; since the beam still hits mirror M33, we will fix this by shaving a few mm off of a couple of spare mounts and re-mount WP02 and PBS02 to this new beam line.  The FE was left running with PMC locked over the weekend to see if our alignment shifts again; if so, then we have another issue to hunt down before proceeding with the beam caustic measurement.

Comments related to this report
matthew.heintze@LIGO.ORG - 07:04, Saturday 03 March 2018 (40827)

For those wondering what Jason is talking about here is an idea of what the different modes look like. We had a very donut looking LG 1,0 mode  instead of 0,0

 

Images attached to this comment
H1 SQZ
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:20, Friday 02 March 2018 - last comment - 17:00, Monday 05 March 2018(40818)
SQZ in-vac cabling

Sheila Daniel

We couldn't see the thermistors after connecting the in-vac sqz cables. Investigating, we found that the signals can be found on cable 303 rather than 304 at the sqz satellite chassis; and the PZTs seem to show up on cable 304 rather than 303. The DCPDs show up as expected on 305. As a side note, we noticed that for DCPD2 the case is connected to the anode, where this is not true for DCPD1. The sqz satellite chassis seems to short the case to the cathode, so this looks like an unwanted short.

We traced the cables to the vacuum flange and found them to be connected correctly, indicating that they are swapped in the chamber. Taking a look inside, we couldn't figure out how relate the cable harness routing described in D1300122 with what is installed. We gave up and left the cables disconnected at the satellite chassis.

Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 17:00, Monday 05 March 2018 (40848)

Hugh and I went in and checked each cable down from the flange and the short seems to be either in the DCPD2 box or the cable leading out of it. I left the 9pin cable bracket unplugged until we have an idea what to do with this.

While I was in there I also swapped the two cables that connected to D1700439 & D1700438 (Termistors and PZTs).

 

LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:16, Friday 02 March 2018 - last comment - 17:21, Friday 02 March 2018(40816)
CP4 bake

CP4 is baking at a rate of around 0.7C/hr. Flow is still 80% restricted at return duct. Kyle, Gerardo and I are splitting shifts to monitor pressure and temperatures remotely. Next week we'll start the regen GN2 heater. 

Temps are monitored here: https://lhocds.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/cr_screens/png/video0-1.png, and also at CP3's discharge TE202A channel (we are unofficially calling it GV11 air temp).

The heater is controlled by the reading of thermocouple installed at supply exit, which is the warmed spot, as expected.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 17:21, Friday 02 March 2018 (40817)

3-day pressure trends at CP4 and on adjacent sides of GV11,12

Images attached to this comment
H1 SUS (COC, DetChar, SYS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:08, Friday 02 March 2018 (40815)
A Few Publicity Photos of H1 SUS ETMY's AERM
J. Kissel, J. Warner

While in chamber to B&K the PCAL Periscope (see LHO aLOG 40814), I grabbed a few publicity photos of the backside of H1SUSETMY on Jim's phone for future talks that reference the AERM.

Enjoy!
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:06, Friday 02 March 2018 (40814)
H1 PCAL EY Periscope B'n'K Hammer Response, Final Configuration (Vibration Absorbers + Baffles)
J. Kissel, J. Warner

Jim and I hammered the H1 PCAL EY Periscope this morning after all planned modifications have been completed (as of LHO aLOG 40777). Excellent news -- all resonances below 400 Hz have been entirely squashed. Given these results, I would expect higher frequency resonances are equally squashed.

Nice work design and installation teams!

The attached images show the chosen accelerometer locations (different from LHO aLOG 40330 because both accelerometer mounting holes were used up by the baffle installation) and hit locations.

The .pdf attached shows four plots: 
- A recap of what we used to have at H1 and L1,
- A before vs. after comparison of the 12 O'Clock position accelerometer response to a 7 O'Clock strike
- A before vs. after comparison of the 3 O'Clock vs. 9 O'Clock position to 7 O'Clock strike (because of the cylindrical symmetry, we figured 9 and 3 were equivalent, as long as the radial position was the same-ish).
- A show of both 12 and 9 O'Clock responses to 7 O'Clock strike in the final configuration, showing there isn't an high-Q resonance left to be found!
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SUS
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:44, Friday 02 March 2018 (40813)
EY SUS Ground Loop

Checked for ground loops at EY this afternoon. Found issues with three cables (SUS_1, SUS_16, and SUS_19). Coordiinated with SUS team and will investigate/repair on Monday.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:28, Friday 02 March 2018 - last comment - 17:41, Friday 02 March 2018(40811)
Ops Shift Summary
TITLE: 03/02 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
LOG:

Jeff K. and Jim running B&K measurements of PCAL at end Y

16:27 UTC Corey to ISCT6 to fix door handle
16:39 UTC Sheila to optics lab to cover equipment in prep for facilities work
16:51 UTC Corey to optics lab to cover equipment in prep for facilities work
16:59 UTC Jeff K. and Jim back from end Y
17:09 UTC Jason and Ed to PSL enclosure
17:19 UTC Terry to ISCT6 to work on beam path
17:25 UTC Rick to end X to put lock and tag on PCAL laser in prep for vent
17:31 UTC Travis to end Y, in chamber work
17:49 UTC Chandra to mid Y
17:54 UTC Karen at mid Y
18:00 UTC Karen leaving mid Y to retrieve vacuum from corner station
18:17 UTC Karen back at mid Y
18:24 UTC Sheila and Corey out of optics lab
18:24 UTC Travis back from end Y
18:31 UTC Marc to LVEA for cosmic ray testing
18:31 UTC Nutsinee to ISCT6
18:50 UTC Matt H. to PSL
19:05 UTC Karen leaving mid Y
19:11 UTC Signed WP 7395. Sheila making model changes, no restarts
19:36 UTC Nutsinee back
19:38 UTC Tumbleweed thrashing near corner station
20:02 UTC Delivery from Apollo
20:02 UTC Jeff K. to optics lab
22:09 UTC Matt H., Ed and Jason out of PSL enclosure for lunch
20:10 UTC Jeff K. out of optics lab
20:55 UTC TJ and Travis to HAM6
21:08 UTC Marc and Elizabeth to LVEA to work on cosmic ray
21:15 UTC Sheila to LVEA to look for headsets
21:18 UTC Ed and Jason to PSL enclosure
21:23 UTC Sheila to end Y to look for headsets
21:23 UTC Matt H. to PSL enclosure
21:24 UTC TJ and Travis out of HAM6
21:32 UTC Marc and Elizabeth back
21:44 UTC Filiberto and Elizabeth to end Y for SUS ground loop checking, then pulling fiber from patch panel in VEA to fan room for access control system
21:48 UTC Sheila back
21:54 UTC Hugh and Mark to LVEA
21:57 UTC Sheila to HAM6 to install fibers
22:00 UTC Nutsinee to find Sheila in LVEA
22:10 UTC Travis moving equipment from end Y to end X
23:07 UTC Travis back
23:24 UTC Greg leading tour into CR
23:36 UTC Greg leading tour out of CR to overpass
00:10 UTC Cheryl to PSL enclosure, WP 7393
00:24 UTC Filiberto and Elizabeth back
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 17:28, Friday 02 March 2018 (40819)
01:28 UTC Cheryl back
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 17:41, Friday 02 March 2018 (40820)
01:41 UTC Matt H., Ed and Jason out of the PSL enclosure
H1 SUS (CDS, SQZ)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:02, Friday 02 March 2018 - last comment - 16:06, Tuesday 06 March 2018(40808)
ZM1 Infrastructure Filled In; First Driven TFs Show Rubbing or Electronics Issues
J. Kissel

I've filled in the infrastructure for ZM1, which was mostly copying over filters from ZM2, and filling in the standard OSEM2EUL and EUL2OSEM matrices for an HTTS. I found, however, that the damping loops don't work. So, I took some driven transfer functions and spectra to see if I could identify the problem. Sadly, the dynamics -- especially the common mode actuator longitudinal TF -- looks pretty dicey. See attached screen shots.

Data templates live here:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/ZM1/SAGM1/Data
    2018-03-02_2225_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
    2018-03-02_2225_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
    2018-03-02_2225_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:05, Friday 02 March 2018 (40810)CDS, ISC, SQZ, SUS
Problem with ZM1 Identified / Diagnosed; Solution Proposed

J. Kissel

The above transfer functions -- especially the P to P and Y to Y transfer functions -- reminded me of what we typically see in the off-diagonal transfer functions (e.g. P to Y or Y to L). This lead me to suspect the basis transformation and/or the sign of actuation chain. I first confirmed that the OSEM2EUL or EUL2OSEM matrices were installed correctly, and they were (I just did it, so...).  So, then I started applying offsets in the COILOUTF bank. 

Using the conventions defined in T1200015, I expect that a positive offset in the COILOUTF bank (if I've got the COILOUTF GAIN correct, and the magnets are arranged as in the HTTS controls design description, E1400316) would cause that corresponding OSEM sensor to go more positive. This worked for UL and LL, but I got a more negative response from UR and LR.

I then flipped the COILOUTF GAIN sign on those two, and et voila! The transfer functions cleaned up nicely, and look exactly as expected (within the tolerance / varience of HTTS resonances that we've seen prior).
I conclude that the UR and LR Flag/Magnets have N and S facing magnets, respectively (when looking at them from the back of the optic) when they hould have S and N, respectively.

Nice -- "simple" solution!
For now, I've left the non-conforming COILOUTF gains that make the SUS bhave as normal in place.

I've spoken with TJ, and he'll (a) check the polarity of the flags to confirm, and (b) flip them, such that ZM1 conforms to E1400316 on Monday.

If only the OPOS was this easy to diagnose...

New data files live in 
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/ZM1/SAGM1/Data/
    2018-03-02_2312_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
    2018-03-02_2312_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
    2018-03-02_2312_H1SUSZM1_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:36, Friday 02 March 2018 (40812)ISC, SQZ, SUS

 ... But #RespectThePhase

J. Kissel

A keen observer will notice that although the labels in the legend say ZM1 for the reference, I copied over the template from  
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/ZM2/SAGM1/Data/
    2018-01-24_1909_H1SUSZM2_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
    2018-01-24_1909_H1SUSZM2_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
    2018-01-24_1909_H1SUSZM2_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
then text search-and-replaced ZM1 with ZM2. Long-story-short: the reference trace is ZM2. 

Now, respect the phase: see that ZM2's phase is 180 deg at DC, where ZM1's is 0 deg at DC for all DOFs? Grumble Grumble Grumble... That means where ZM2 requires a different damping loop sign than ZM1.
An inventory of our HTTS reveals that OM1, OM2, OM3, ZM2, and RM1 all require positive damping loop gains (all other digital signs being equal), and RM2 -- and now ZM1 -- requires negative.
Sadly -- this also means that ALL BUT RM2 and ZM1 ARE WRONG by an overall sign.

*now* I think that it's the *LEFT* sign of the magnets that are flipped the wrong way -- namely that UL and LL are  S and N, respectively when they should be N and S, respectively.

But -- since we have access to ZM1 right now, and I'd rather we have to change one (two, if you count RM2) suspension than five.

So -- this is what I predict TJ will find (looking at the back / AR side of the optic):

    UL        UR
    S         S

    
    N         N
    LL        LR
and he should re-arrange the magnets to be

    UL        UR
    S         N

    
    N         S
    LL        LR
which is the exact opposite of what's shown in E1400316, so that we confirm to the apparent LHO convention.
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:06, Tuesday 06 March 2018 (40861)
THIS aLOG AND COMMENTS ARE FULL OF LIES: Go to LHO aLOG 40847 for final answer as to what was going wrong with the sign convention.
Displaying reports 45201-45220 of 84893.Go to page Start 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 End