Displaying reports 45941-45960 of 88268.Go to page Start 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 End
Reports until 17:34, Wednesday 22 August 2018
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:34, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43603)
ASC POP QPDs pico'ed to center

[Gabriele, Stefan, Jenne]

We have a pretty consistent recycling gain of 32 right now (we've seen it go up to 34 during an alignment transient, so there's more, but we're already pretty good).  So, we elected to pico the ASC POP QPDs so that we can close the PRC1 loop to hold the PRM. 

We tried moving the beam spot on PR2, and this is really about the best spot that we have so far.  So, we'll perhaps reconsider after we've walked around the SOFT pointing, but this is our current best. 

Right now, we have INP1, PRC2, and CHARD all coming on at the same time in the ENGAGE_REFL_POP_WFS state.  Executing that state has worked several times now. 

H1 ISC (ISC)
georgia.mansell@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:47, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43602)
POPAIR_B lens replaced

Patrick G, Georgia

This afternoon we replaced the lens which focuses the beam onto LSC-POPAIR_B on ISCT1. The previous lens had a too long focal length and the beam was over-filling the diode. The new lens is f~100 mm.

H1 CDS (CDS)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:46, Wednesday 22 August 2018 - last comment - 19:49, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43599)
Guardian Redirect Bug
Sheila, Craig, Jaime

We've been having issues where our ASC output matrix is not being set.  This happens in ISC_DRMI guardian state PREP_DRMI_ASC.
I found a lock from last night where this occurred and caused a lockloss.  Plotting around this time showed that nothing was changing in either the ASC intrix or outrix: PREP_DRMI_ASC was not working.

We dove in the guardlogs for ISC_LOCK and ISC_DRMI.  From them, we discovered that the ISC_LOCK guardian was accidentally requesting PREP_DRMI_ASC from the ISC_DRMI guardian twice, first in ACQUIRE_DRMI_1F and second in the next state, DRMI_LOCKED_PREP_ASC.  When we make this second request, it triggers a redirect from PREP_DRMI_ASC to PREP_DRMI_ASC.
Jaime told us that a redirect will kill the original worker after a second, and spawn a new worker at the top of the state.  So in principle, PREP_DRMI_ASC should have still been run.  However, we were not observing this.  In the middle of the redirect, a new request was sent for DRMI_1F_LOCKED_W_ASC to the ISC_DRMI guardian.  We believe this may have forced the new worker to be spawned thinking it had finished PREP_DRMI_ASC.

In any case, this is clear abuse of guardian by us the users.  We removed the second request for PREP_DRMI_ASC from DRMI_LOCKED_PREP_ASC so no redirect will be triggered, and we hope this will solve the issue.


ISC_DRMI guardlog

2018-08-22_06:52:09.460465Z ISC_DRMI EDGE: DRMI_WFS_CENTERING->PREP_DRMI_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:09.461225Z ISC_DRMI calculating path: PREP_DRMI_ASC->PREP_DRMI_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:09.480981Z ISC_DRMI executing state: PREP_DRMI_ASC (78)
2018-08-22_06:52:09.480981Z ISC_DRMI [PREP_DRMI_ASC.enter]
2018-08-22_06:52:09.779847Z ISC_DRMI REQUEST: PREP_DRMI_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:09.780606Z ISC_DRMI calculating path: PREP_DRMI_ASC->PREP_DRMI_ASC           # REDIRECT begun here
2018-08-22_06:52:09.781037Z ISC_DRMI same state request redirect
2018-08-22_06:52:09.781037Z ISC_DRMI REDIRECT requested, timeout in 1.000 seconds
2018-08-22_06:52:09.781796Z ISC_DRMI REDIRECT wait for worker completion...
...
2018-08-22_06:52:10.097441Z ISC_DRMI REDIRECT wait for worker completion...
2018-08-22_06:52:10.146787Z ISC_DRMI REQUEST: DRMI_1F_LOCKED_W_ASC                            # NEW REQUEST for DRMI_1F_LOCKED_W_ASC begun here
2018-08-22_06:52:10.147456Z ISC_DRMI calculating path: PREP_DRMI_ASC->DRMI_1F_LOCKED_W_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:10.147456Z ISC_DRMI new target: ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:10.148189Z ISC_DRMI REDIRECT wait for worker completion...
2018-08-22_06:52:10.197836Z ISC_DRMI REQUEST: DRMI_1F_LOCKED_W_ASC
...
2018-08-22_06:52:10.783208Z ISC_DRMI REDIRECT wait for worker completion...
2018-08-22_06:52:10.783208Z ISC_DRMI REDIRECT timeout reached. worker terminate and reset...
2018-08-22_06:52:10.800447Z ISC_DRMI worker terminated
2018-08-22_06:52:10.815603Z ISC_DRMI W: initialized
2018-08-22_06:52:10.873188Z ISC_DRMI W: EZCA v1.2.0
2018-08-22_06:52:10.873685Z ISC_DRMI W: EZCA CA prefix: H1:
2018-08-22_06:52:10.873685Z ISC_DRMI W: ready
2018-08-22_06:52:10.874327Z ISC_DRMI worker ready
2018-08-22_06:52:10.878507Z ISC_DRMI EDGE: PREP_DRMI_ASC->ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:10.879330Z ISC_DRMI calculating path: ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC->DRMI_1F_LOCKED_W_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:10.880327Z ISC_DRMI new target: DRMI_1F_LOCKED_W_ASC
2018-08-22_06:52:10.885337Z ISC_DRMI executing state: ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC (80)
2018-08-22_06:52:10.885986Z ISC_DRMI [ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC.enter]

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 19:49, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43608)

A few things to note:

1)We should try to avoid making requests in the run state without some sort of if statement to make sure we don't continuously make requests of managed guardian nodes. 

2)When we see same state redirect in the gaurdian log, it means that we have requested it to run the state that is currently running, and the guardian responds to this by waiting one second, (REDIRECT waiting for worker completion) and after this starting the state over from the beginning.  (This is usually not what we want, so we should use care not to request things that are already happening). 

3) nodes[ISC_DRMI].arrived returns true when a guardian starts the requested state, not when it finishes it.  There are some places in the guardian where we use this for states that are not just place holder states, and it seems the code is not doing what we expected in some places. 

LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43598)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 08/22 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: Commissioning work continues. Plagued by many small earthquakes today, and some large ones last night, the ground has not been very still.
LOG: See Attached

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 TCS (AWC, TCS)
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:27, Wednesday 22 August 2018 - last comment - 16:37, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43595)
CO2Y Fixed

Amber, Danny, Thomas

With our bad RF cable fixed, we hooked the original CO2Y laser and driver up and found that it still lased well at 50 Watts.  So we plan on putting the spare CO2 laser back in storage (after we dry it out).

One very odd thing that confused us for a couple of hours is that after we dressed and organized some cables, the laser wouldn't turn on again!  Not only that, the readbacks of current and voltage draw was in the negatives when it should be nominally: I =28 Amps, V = 28 Volts.  Fil and Peter King double checked that the power supply wasn't the issue and able to drive current on a resistor.  Then I remembered that the readback from the power supply's current and voltage go to an AA chassis in the CER before going to the ADC. 

We then found the AA chassis was actually turned off, which is really odd because no one should've be touching those electronics.  Trending the data, it looks like the problem started at 10:54 AM local time.  Anyway, once the chassis was turned on, the laser ran like clockwork....yes.  Luckily, all of our tests and jostling didn't misalign the beam too badly downstream on the two irises so should be good to try a contrast defect measurement. 

Comments related to this report
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - 16:37, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43600)

The laser is lasing, however, the readback of the power supply on the mezzanine is still reading weird voltages and currents: -2.5V instead of expected 28V and .31A instead of  expected 28A.  I wonder if it's a bad integrated circuit; a few months ago Ed fixed something similar on this same AA chassis.

LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:20, Wednesday 22 August 2018 - last comment - 18:51, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43596)
Check on Y2-8 and X2-8 Batteries

Both battery sets that are maintained by the solar cells were visited today.

Y2-8, battery 1 read 14.80 VDC and battery 2 read 14.70 VDC.

X2-8, battery 1 read 15.20 VDC and battery 2 read 14.30 VDC.

See photos for arrangement of batteries.

Solar cells are in good condition for both stations, a bit dirty but in good health.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 18:51, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43605)VE

While at X2-8 noticed that a grounding cable is no longer attached to the ceiling (see photos), aging glue I assume is the culprit.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:03, Wednesday 22 August 2018 - last comment - 15:20, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43594)
EY chiller alarm

Bubba G., Richard M., Chandra R., Mark D., Chris S., Kyle R.

1416 hrs local -> Received an EY CHILL-SUP-H2O alarm -> Investigation showed everything was normal at the EY chiller #2 control panel.  Bubba G. is aware and monitoring.  Richard M. also had received other alarms at near the same time which may indicated a power-related "glitch" etc. 

No action needed at this time.

Comments related to this report
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 15:20, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43597)

Attached graph shows the source of the alarm and that it was just a transient

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 CDS (CDS, VE)
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:21, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43593)
Lowered EPICS low alarm limit for H0:VAC-LX_CP2_II190_AIP_IC_LOGMA
WP 7787

Per Chandra's request I have changed the low alarm limit for H0:VAC-LX_CP2_II190_AIP_IC_LOGMA from -2 to -3.5: caput H0:VAC-LX_CP2_II190_AIP_IC_LOGMA.LOW -3.5

This is only done in EPICS, so will be reverted if the IOC gets restarted.
H1 SQZ (SQZ)
haocun.yu@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:29, Wednesday 22 August 2018 - last comment - 12:55, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43573)
OMC Scan with squeezer beam

[Sheila, Haocun, Nutinsee, Terry]

We managed to take a cavity scan of OMC with beams from squeezer.

 

We first used a full power SEED beam going in, but an OPO temperature not at exact dual resonance (because of the homodyne readouts fluctuations due to NLG).

This gave us an output even higher than the input..

 

Then we used CLF beam going in, which has a lower power, and at the peak of dual resonance.

This gave us stabler readouts on the homodyne, but the alignment were not as good as compared with using SEED.

We were also able to lock the OMC with CLF.

--> 18.7% loss (too much less than expected..?)

 

I am doing more calculations with the cavity scan data, and will add more follow-up details.

Next Tuesday we can work on centering loops using seed, from ZM1, ZM2 to AS_A/B.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
lisa.barsotti@LIGO.ORG - 02:41, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43581)SQZ

How do you get 19% with those numbers?

0.06/(0.13*(1-0.325)) = 0.68

This is more like 30% loss.

Do I misunderstand what you mean?

haocun.yu@LIGO.ORG - 12:55, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43592)

Lisa, the OMC locking power should be 0.06mA on the DCPD, which means 0.07mW after calibration, but the 19% is probably under-estimated.


More numerical results (including corrections) from the cavity scan:

 

Using CLF:

From the plot:

Mode 00 01/10 20 higher
mA 0.0562 0.011 0.005 0.0021

Total: 0.0743mA --> 0.0885mW

Power input from Homodyne power is 0.123*1.13*(1-0.3234)=0.094mW  (factor 1.13: calibration factor of Homondynes which was forgot) --> Loss from propagation: 5.8%

00 mode: 75.6% --> Loss due to alignment and mode matching = 24.4%

10/01 mode: 14.8%

20 mode: 6.7%

 

Using SEED:

Mode 00 01/10 20 higher
mA 0.245 0.01 0.023 0.003

Total: 0.281mA --> 0.335mW (This is higher than the power input from Homodyne power, which is 0.37*1.13*(1-0.3234)=0.284mW)

00 mode: 87.2% --> Loss due to alignment and mode matching = 12.8%

10/01 mode: 3.5% (Alignment better than CLF)

20 mode: 8.2%

 

Conclusion:

Loss from Faraday and propagation: 6%;

Cavity loss due to alignment and mode matching is around 24.4%, in which mode matching accounts for ~7-8%.


We will try to take another measurement with higher stable power.

H1 PSL
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:28, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43590)
Weekly PSL Chiller Reservoir Top-Off

FAMIS10471

Added 75mL to the crystal chiller.

H1 AOS
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:04, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43588)
Monthly Dust Monitor Vacuum Pump Check (FAMIS #7528)
   All three pumps temperatures are operating well within specs. Made minor adjustments to the air bypass to bring vacuum pressure to 18inHq. Did not observe any problems or issues with any of the pumps. 

   Closing FAMIS task #7528. 
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:57, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43586)
CDS model and DAQ restart report: Saturday 18th - Tuesday 21st August 2018

model restarts logged for Sat 18/Aug/2018 - Mon 20/Aug/2018 No restarts reported

model restarts logged for Tue 21/Aug/2018
2018_08_21 15:26 h1nds1

unexpected restart of nds

H1 SEI
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:51, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43585)
H1 ISI CPS Noise Spectra Check - Weekly

FAMIS7350

HAM3 H2 seems to be elevated a bit more than the rest in the high frequencies. The the script did not report any issues.

Images attached to this report
H1 AOS (ISC)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:48, Wednesday 22 August 2018 - last comment - 11:43, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43579)
Tonight's locking activities
Sheila, Stefan, Craig

- Very often when acquiring DRMI, we have 5-second baby-locks where DRMI is triggered and catches, then spontaneously drops lock.  We have been triggering DRMI catches on POPAIR18 flashes above 20 for MICH and SRCL (PRCL is always triggered).  Now we only trigger MICH straightaway, then after a 0.25 second delay, we "trigger" SRCL by kicking on SRCL1 FM1, which is now a +106 dB gain.  We changed SRCL1 FM2 to be a -100 dB gain which is always on.  (SRCL1 filter module pictured)
After making this change, we have still observed baby-locks, but have been consistently locking within about two minutes, never more than five minutes.  This method avoids kicking SRM, which helps in general, but did not solve the baby-lock issue.  We suspect something in DRMI_LOCKED state causes the baby-locklosses.

- ALS is unstable.  Upon reaching LOCKING_ALS, when trying to lock DIFF we've been consistently losing the arms.  Sheila lowered the QUIET threshold in LOCKING_ARMS_GREEN so the arms settle more before trying to lock ALS.  After DRMI/IFO locklosses, we sometimes keep arms for a while, only to lose them a few minutes later. 
- We stopped for the evening when the COMM PLL was not locking and we could not lock ALS.  This whole COMM and DIFF PLL glitching/runaway frequency business is becoming urgent.  

- ALS Y is still struggling to lock on the correct mode after lockloss.  We reset the green YARM alignment using Kiwamu's QPD offset servo for zeroing green WFS.  Unclear if this helped YARM acquistion, really doesn't seem like it.
- I tried to do the XARM as well but this nearly caused a lockloss twice.  VERY unclear why that should be the case since by RESONANCE we should not be using green WFS to align our arms.  A cursory check of the ALS DOFs confirmed they were all off (GAIN = 0) for both X and Y.
- New green QPD offsets in Pic 3, old ones in Pic 4.  

- The ASC output matrix from MICH to the BS was inexplicably not set during PREP_DRMI_ASC twice.  We had a similar problem with INP2 earlier.  When we did execute the state, the log showed the ezca writing was really slow, could be an ezca issue.  For now, we really have to pay attention to our ASC output matrix, because the control signals on the StripTool monitors are lies.

- Sheila walked ITMY in pitch today, and increased the recycling gain by 10% (from 28 to 31).  We suspect we haven't completely finished the pitch walk, and need to walk yaw as well.

- Engaging the CHARD loops has proven difficult today.  When closing CHARD, PRC2 tends to have a strong response, sometimes running away completely.  When we closed all the corner ASC loops plus DHARD and CHARD, we achieved a recycling gain of 31.

- Stefan used his pr2spotmove.py script, with crazy results.  POPAIR18 reached about 70 and POPAIR90 reached about 18 counts, a 80% increase.  The recycling gain remained steady at about 30.  We doubt this is real, but also don't have any good explanations.  Maybe clipping on the POPAIR PD is causing and apparent RF power increase.  It's possible it was real and clipping was just horrible on PR2, but this does not seem realistic, especially since the PR gain did not increase (PR gain is just calibrated POP_A_LF divided by IM4_TRANS).  Picture 5 shows Stefan moving the spot on PR2 by adjusting PR3 pitch alignment, which soon after lead to a lockloss.  We adjusted the WFS alignment back to when the POPAIR gains were normal.

- At around 2:36:00 PDT there was a massive earthquake which tripped every single ISI watchdog we've got.  Apparently it was a 6.3 located in Bandon, Oregon.  The ground velocity is literally off the charts, reaching 30 um/s in the 0.03-0.1 Hz band.  After five minutes of looking I found the REALLY BIG EARTHQUAKE button that's I've heard about and hit it, it changed every HAM state to ISI_DAMPED_HEPI_OFFLINE, hope that was correct.  

- I restarted the HWS code at around 2:26 PDT (GSP = 1218965247), and started the ring heater tests a little later, which said they should be done in an hour.  I also started the HWS ITM PRISM PROBE dtt templates.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 10:03, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43587)

[Hang, Gabriele, Jenne]

SRY of initial alignment was using that FM1, so we kicked SRM pretty hard several times until we re-read this alog.  HAM5 and all optics on it but SR3 tripped once, but SRM alone tripped several times. 

In the past, FM1 (then a +6 dB) was engaged after SRY caught lock.  So, the guardian's turning on this new +106dB gain obviously isn't what we want to do.  It seems like SRY is kind of fine with a factor 2 lower gain than it used to have (just leaving things with the acquisition gain), so we've just removed FM1 from engaging after the cavity is locked.  If we decide that SRY really does need that +6dB after the cavity locks and the integrator is on, we can adjust the input matrix gain.

gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 11:43, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43591)

Here's a measurement of the MICH open loop transfer function in the MICH_DARK_LOCKED state, with the increased gain.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:13, Wednesday 22 August 2018 - last comment - 11:42, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43580)
introducing ndscope

I have installed a prototype of a new dataviewer/pydv replacement that I'm currently calling "ndscope".

Features:

Planned features:

It should be available as "ndscope" in the path.  Please submit feature requests and bug reports directly to the ndscope issue tracker.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 02:54, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43582)

NOTE: dataviewer will be phased out in the near future, and ndscope is it's intended replacement.  Please keep that in mind while testing, and test extensively and provide feedback, so both you and ndscope are ready when dataviewer is decommissioned.

gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 11:42, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43589)
H1 TCS
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:39, Tuesday 21 August 2018 - last comment - 18:04, Wednesday 22 August 2018(43564)
HWS EY Realigned with 50um Core Fiber

Danny V., Georgia M., TJ S.

Today we continued to touch up the alignment of the EY HWS path with the 50um core fiber that was installed last week. We ended up translating the BS2, the polarizer, and L3 because we seemed to have a good alignment to the irises, but it was not centered on these optics. There was some bright fringes seen on the outside of the beam that we cut out using the iris on the fiber launcher. After some minor tweaks to the alignment, we were able to get rid of much of the clipping on the sides that we saw previously, and we now have an almost round beam profile as seen on the HWS camera. (Attached a screenshot of the stream with a the plate off.)

Tonight we will run a ring heater test and post results tomorrow.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
georgia.mansell@LIGO.ORG - 18:04, Wednesday 22 August 2018 (43604)
Some additional thoughts on HWS ETMY mode matching
 
Yesterday we also measured distances on the HWS path from the SLED to the polariser. They are roughly equal to that in Aidan’s mode matching mathematica notebook (T10001717).
 
According to that mode matching solution we should have a waist ~2.2 m after the fiber collimator (not technically a collimator but a lens after the fiber launcher, but I’ll call it a collimator anyway).
 
In reality (just looking at the beam size on the card) we see a waist roughly at the position of the diverging lens, 86 cm from the collimator. After the diverging lens the beam is diverging. We were not able to find a position of the 120mm lens where the beam continues to converge after the diverging lens.
 
L2, the distance from the fiber collimator to the diverging lens, is 4cm shorter on the table than in the mathematica notebook - 860 mm compared to 903 mm. I re-evaluated the waist size with the new distance, recreating plots on page 13 of the PDF, output 215 and 206, to see if this explained the difference in waist position. The notebook suggested the waist would move *further* from the fiber collimator, but not but very much. This is the opposite of what we see on the table.
 
Conclusion: if we need to be strict about mode matching we should measure take a beam scan to end-y to make sure we know the mode size coming out of the collimator, and look at this as a function of position of the collimator lens.
Displaying reports 45941-45960 of 88268.Go to page Start 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 End