Displaying reports 45961-45980 of 84815.Go to page Start 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 End
Reports until 17:42, Wednesday 03 January 2018
H1 TCS (TCS)
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:42, Wednesday 03 January 2018 - last comment - 12:09, Thursday 04 January 2018(39977)
CO2 Chillers

GGrabeel, TVo

Topped off the chillers and started them back up this afternoon. They immediately faulted out, due to a set-point error. I set them to run in manual while I checked for leaks, there were no apparent leaks. TVo found the problem in EPICS where an integrator on a control loop was causing the set point to steadily increase (It was up to about 500,000 degrees Celsius I think). After turning off some inputs and filters we were able to get the more reasonable value of 21 degrees Celsius. The chillers will continue to run and be re-checked tomorrow.

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - 12:09, Thursday 04 January 2018 (39987)
   This morning I noticed a large puddle of water under the TCS-X chiller. Water level looked OK in the site glass. 
H1 SUS (CDS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:41, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39976)
H1 SUS SRM Top Mass (M1) OSEM Noise Problems Alleviated
J. Kissel, R. McCarthy, P. Fritschel 
FRS Ticket 5063
Prior LHO aLOGs 13556, 14357, and 21481

In perusing the list of closed FRS tickets after the Sep-Dec 2017 vent, Peter found that the above mentioned FRS ticket 5063, "H1 SRM osems (LF RT SD and T3) have excess noise" had been closed without supporting data. Richard clearly states in the most recent comment that the problem was a prominent screw head grounding against the chamber in-vacuo, but just didn't get the chance to post the data.

Attached is the supporting data. Where, in the past, SRM had shown prominent features and combs originating from large peaks around 1700 Hz and 1900 Hz, there are no such features visible in any of the OSEMs on SRM. For random comparison, I show SR3 top mass OSEMs as well.
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (OpsInfo)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:18, Wednesday 03 January 2018 - last comment - 15:01, Thursday 04 January 2018(39975)
H1 SUS HAM2/HAM3 IO and PR Optics are Free of Rubbing at ~1e-6 Torr
J. Kissel

I've taken standard rubbing-check, top-mass to top-mass transfer functions for all suspensions in HAM2 and HAM3, now that we're down to about 1e-6 Torr (which is sufficient a vacuum that the suspension positions won't change further from buoyancy). Good news: All suspensions are free of rubbing after pumpdown, including MC1, MC2, MC3, IM1-4, PRM, PR2, and PR3.

Data files are listed below. Detailed results will be processed and posted in due time.
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/MC?/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-03*.xml
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/PR?/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-03*.xml

    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HLTS/H1/PR3/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-03*.xml

    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HAUX/H1/IM?/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-04*.xml

As a teaser / proof, I attach screenshots of each M1 Pitch to M1 Pitch transfer functions for the Triples.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 10:27, Thursday 04 January 2018 (39982)
Detail results for IM1, IM2, IM3, and IM4, plus the collection are attached. This detailed analysis confirms that they're free of rubbing.
Non-image files attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 15:01, Thursday 04 January 2018 (39995)
Detailed results for PR3. Note that these latest transfer functions were taken *after* the repaired T3 LF RT SD Top mass coil driver has been re-installed (See LHO aLOG 39946). 

Everything looks good. 

This should be enough evidence to close out FRS Ticket 9497.

The only that catches one's eye are the apparent extra L resonances in the Yaw to Yaw transfer function. We've seen such features before, and we usually attribute it to the benign effect of poor common mode subtraction in the LF and RT OSEMs. In other words, Yaw is a differential measurement of the horizontal rotation about the vertical center of mass, and it has been polluted by the common mode horizontal measurement which contains Longitudinal. If (a) the sensors / flags are laterally misaligned, (b) the sensor gains are not well matched, or (c) the suspension rotates about an axis that is misaligned with the cage location of the OSEMs, then you would see such an effect as we see. I'd say all are plausible, and again all are benign.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 General
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:33, Wednesday 03 January 2018 - last comment - 16:45, Wednesday 03 January 2018(39973)
Bubba transitioning LVEA to laser hazard

Bubba and Bailey are in-process of sweeping the LVEA and transitioning to laser hazard, and opening the main PSL light pipe so we can work on IMC alignment.

Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 16:45, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39974)

Finished!  We have light!

H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:33, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39972)
Reducing HEPI isolation offsets reduces impact of HEPI trips

We've known for a while that HEPI trips kick the suspensions prett badly. One of the things SamC found looking at earthquakes, is that during very large earthquakes, HEPI is often the first platform to trip. Hugh and I have used the post-vent time to minimize the differences between the free hanging HEPI positions and the target positions, by tweaking the springs. I used ETMY to test if this reduced the kick to the quad and it seems to be pretty good. The first plot shows the ETMY ISI T240s and the IPS cart locations during a trip before (blue traces on all plots) and after we reduced the offsets (red on all plots). Before offloading, the HEPI trip immediately tripped the ISI and kicked everything around quite a bit. After, the ISI actually stayed isolated until the T240s saturated, some 30+ seconds later, and even then the kick to the table wasn't that violent. The quad sees pretty much the same thing. Before, the suspension gets a pretty kick from the HEPI trip, but after the quad barely sees any motion at all.

This may not reflect what we see during an earthquake, but I don't see how this could make things worse. We'll need to monitor this for a little while because HEPI seems to be prone to drifting more that the ISIs, and we don't really know how much it drifts long term. 

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS (ISC)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:09, Wednesday 03 January 2018 - last comment - 16:18, Wednesday 03 January 2018(39970)
h1lsc0 models needed to be restarted, repeat of timing error first seen 22nd Dec 2017

All models on h1lsc0 froze up at 15:21 PST due to an IRIG-B timing error on the h1ioplsc0 model. The dmesg logs suggests this is a repeat of the problem seen on Friday 22nd December 2017 which also required a full model restart.

Looking at minute trends, the IOP IRIG-B signal went from 13 uS to 202,710 uS at 15:21:42 PST, later it jumped up to 732,404 uS at 15:30:42 PST. After restarting the model, it returned to 13uS.

On Friday Dec 22 2017 at 09:44:42 PST this signal jumped to 296,598 uS until it was reset 13 minutes later (no subsequent jump into the 0.7 S region).

h1lsc0's dmesg logs for the two events are:

[6123949.214305] h1lscaux: ADC TIMEOUT 0 46035 19 46099
[6123949.214307] h1omc: ADC TIMEOUT 0 46035 19 46099
[6123949.214309] h1lsc: ADC TIMEOUT 0 46035 19 46099
[6123949.214311] h1sqz: ADC TIMEOUT 0 46035 19 46099
[6123949.214312] h1omcpi: ADC TIMEOUT 0 46035 19 46099

           ...

[7179982.197361] h1lscaux: ADC TIMEOUT 0 52188 28 52252
[7179982.197363] h1omc: ADC TIMEOUT 0 52188 28 52252
[7179982.197366] h1lsc: ADC TIMEOUT 0 52188 28 52252
[7179982.197368] h1sqz: ADC TIMEOUT 0 52188 28 52252
[7179982.197370] h1omcpi: ADC TIMEOUT 0 52188 28 52252
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 16:18, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39971)

Following the restarts, I green'ed up the overview by diag-resetting all models to clear any IPC errors and cleared the DAQ accumulated CRC errors on h1lsc0.  The only remaining RED item is the DAQ EDCU, which is unable to connect to two corner station Beckhoff Slow Controls channels following yesterday's code change of h1ecatc1plc3. The two channels are:

H1:TCS-ITMX_CO2_TEMP_SPARE
H1:TCS-ITMY_CO2_TEMP_SPARE

this will require restarting the DAQ to use the latest INI files to clear.

H1 IOO (PSL)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:07, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39969)
Rotation Stage Re-enabled (LHO WP 7263)

This afternoon I removed the lock from and re-enabled the PSL/IOO rotation stage, as stated in LHO WP 7263, for commissioning of the IMC prior to alignment activity in HAM6.  This completes WP 7263.

LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:06, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39961)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 01/03 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY: Starting to hook up the tables and cables from the CS vent, and prep at EY for its vent. SEI crew is has been working on HEPI at HAM4 and EY. Jeff K has ran measurements and cleared all of the large suspensions in HAM2/3 (ie. MC's & PR's). We will be going laser hazard shortly and commissioning work will begin on the IMC.
LOG:

H1 PSL
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39968)
PSL Restarted After Holiday Break + Weekly FAMIS Tasks

Today I restarted the PSL after it was purposefully shutdown for the duration of the holiday break.  The HPO and 35W FE restarted with no issues, but I did run into an issue while injection locking the two lasers; the injection locking was very unstable.  To ensure the system was at thermal equilibrium I let it warm up for the morning and roughly half of the afternoon before investigating the instability.  By 20:00 UTC (12:00 PST) the injection locking had become more stable, but was still having occasional relocks.  I lowered the ILS gain voltage from 1.0 V to 0.5 V (this is actually a gain increase) and things became more stable.  I also noticed that the SR560 used to boost the low frequency gain of the ILS servo was saturated; I could not get it to clear at the time.  Checking on things again at 22:00 UTC (14:00 PST), the injection locking had stabilized further.  As a double check I looked at the PDH error signal for the injection locking and saw no issues there; this required me to unlock the ILS to see the error signal.  Upon relocking the ILS things looked much more stable, and at about this time I also noticed that the SR560 was no longer saturating.  I turned on the TFIN for the ILS (the signal path we use to boost the ILS low frequency gain) and the signals looked much better.  I left it in that state to continue to warm up for the rest of the afternoon.  As of 23:54 UTC (15:54 PST), the system looked stable and operating normally.  At this point in time I re-enabled the power watchdogs.

I re-enalbed the PMC, FSS, and ISS at ~23:00 UTC (~15:00 PST).  All 3 came back without issue.  I will continue to monitor the system, but as of right now everything appears to be running normally.

 

I also took this opportunity to do the weekly PSL FAMIS tasks during the morning.

HPO Pump Diode Current Adjustment (FAMIS 8455)

With the ISS still OFF, I adjusted the pump diode operating currents and temperatures this morning as part of the PSL restart.  The changes are summarized in the below tables and a screenshot of the PSL Beckhoff main screen is attached for future reference.

HPO Pump Diode Currents
  Operating Current (A)
Old New
DB1 53.7 53.9
DB2 55.4 55.6
DB3 55.4 55.6
DB4 55.4 55.6

 

HPO Pump Diode Temperatures
  Operating Temperatures (°C)
DB1 DB2 DB3 DB4
Old New Old New Old New Old New
D1 26.5 26.0 19.5 20.0 20.5 21.0 22.0 21.5
D2 26.5 26.0 19.0 19.5 24.5 25.0 19.5 19.0
D3 26.5 26.0 20.0 20.5 24.5 25.0 21.0 20.5
D4 26.5 26.0 18.0 18.5 21.5 22.0 19.5 19.0
D5 26.5 26.0 18.0 18.5 25.5 26.0 21.5 21.0
D6 26.5 26.0 18.5 19.0 20.0 20.5 21.5 21.0
D7 26.5 26.0 19.0 19.5 21.0 21.5 21.5 21.0

At the time of adjustment the HPO was outputting ~154.5 W; this was at roughly 18:30 UTC (10:30 PST).  This completes FAMIS 8455.

PSL Power Watchdog Reset (FAMIS 4586)

I turned on both PSL power watchdogs at 23:54 UTC (15:54 PST).  This completes FAMIS 4586.

 

Images attached to this report
H1 PSL (OpsInfo)
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:44, Wednesday 03 January 2018 - last comment - 22:22, Wednesday 03 January 2018(39967)
Should be okay to put a little more power in the IFO, even though HAM6 is still at atmosphere

As we prepare to align the IMC and IOT2, we may want to increase the laser power injected into the vacuum from the few hundred mW that we've been at for a few months up to a couple Watts.  There was some concern that we want to ensure that we're not going to harm anything in HAM6, since it is still at atmosphere and the trigger PD for the fast shutter is not currently plugged in.  There shouldn't be any problem however.  I have got the ITMs, PRM and SRM misaligned so that we're not getting any PRMI flashes and no beam is going to HAM6.  Please leave the ITMs, PRM and SRM misaligned. 

Even if the PRMI were to flash, nothing in HAM6 is aligned, so there should be no beam on any PDs or on the OMC.  Also, the PDs would be able to handle that much power, vacuum or atmo.  Given the gross misalignments, the likelihood of the OMC resonating is vanishingly small.

With the recycling mirrors misaligned but the ITMs aligned (so just transmission through optics, no resonant flashes) the max amount of power going to HAM6 is 3mW for every 1W of injected light (3% transmission through PRM, 25% for 2 BS passes, and 35% for the SRM).  We do not intend to go higher than 1W or 2W, which would put about 6mW at HAM6.  However, it is conceivable that the rotation stage could let up to ~50W into the vacuum, in which case we'd have 130mW of light at HAM6.  Not insignificant, but still should be fine. 

So, we are software ensuring that no beam is going to HAM6 while we use about 2W of PSL power, but even if some of the optics get re-aligned it'll all be fine.

Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 22:22, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39979)

Before going to high power with PRM misaligned, one needs to check that the reflected beam still hits the beam dump on top of HAM2.

H1 PSL
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:33, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39965)
Weekly PSL Chiller Reservoir Top-Off

FAMIS6556

Added 100mL to the crystal chiller.

H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:15, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39964)
CDS model restart report: Monday 1st January - Tuesday 2nd January 2018

Software commissioning is ramping up, so I'm restarting the regular restart alogs.

model restarts logged for Mon 01/Jan/2018 No restarts reported

model restarts logged for Tue 02/Jan/2018
    2018_01_02 13:31 h1lsc
    2018_01_02 13:31 h1omc
    2018_01_02 13:31 h1sqz

    Model changes to lsc, omc and sqz (no DAQ restart needed). Also restarts of h1ecat[x1,y1] and h1hwsmsr[1] (not shown).

H1 SEI
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:41, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39962)
ISI CPS Noise Spectra Check - Weekly

FAMIS6931

For what it is worth while we have work ongoing while we finish up the corner vent and start ET soon, here are the CPS noise spectra.

The scripts reported that the BS and ETMY had some higher noise.

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:00, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39960)
Ops Day Shift Transition

TITLE: 01/03 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 5mph Gusts, 4mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.47 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Plans for today include prep for EY vent and CS commissioning health check, SEI HEPI unlocking and EY locking, getting TCS/HWS back online, and CDS still pulling cables.

H1 AOS (AOS, AWC, VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:46, Wednesday 03 January 2018 - last comment - 03:30, Wednesday 03 January 2018(39957)
AWC Viewport Assembly Installation on HAM5

(Chris S, Kyle R, Gerardo M)

The viewport ASSY-D1700340-001 was installed on A2F4 of HAM5 on December 22 of last year, the conflat joint at this door still needs to be leak checked.

A viewport protector D1200873 was installed with a shiny red metal guillotine D1400106.  To finalize the assembly a yellow protector was used.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 02:55, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39958)

Inspection of components:

Both ZnSe windows were inspected per E1100948:
Part number D1100439 SN017, no notable defects were noted for both faces.
Part number D1100485 SN016, no notable defects were noted for both faces.

Metal components were also visually inspected concentrating on "sealing" surfaces, such as knife edge and o-ring seat for part D1700338.
For the other 2 metal caps (D1700339 and D1700342) the o-ring seat surface was inspected.

The viton o-rings, PEEK shims and KAPTON shim were also visually evaluated.

Images attached to this comment
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - 03:30, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39959)

Assembly of D1700340:

After all components had been inspected the assembly was complete per D1700340.

The viewport was inspected and tested per E1100948, after proof testing was done the test cap was removed to proceed with a successful leak testing.  Second ZnSe window was installed per D1700340.

Attached are two photos of the testing setup, notice the tight fit on the test cap for the different lines, but managed to fit all including a pressure relief valve, vent valve, inlet line and pressure gauge line.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:29, Tuesday 02 January 2018 - last comment - 14:25, Wednesday 03 January 2018(39952)
hot cathode gauge behavior

Noticed that the two relatively new full-range, hot cathode ion gauges on corner volume exhibit strange behavior at a pressure between 5e-6 and 6e-6 Torr. Last Friday PT-180 suddenly fell in pressure (no one on site making changes to vacuum systems). Today when cycling turbo valves (for leak checking), PT-170 suddenly dropped in pressure. Kyle noted something peculiar with PT-525 at EX on Aug. 31, 2017 after TMDS discharge activity (https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=38471). Will contact Inficon for an explanation.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 09:54, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39963)
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 14:25, Wednesday 03 January 2018 (39966)


Annotated plots

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 45961-45980 of 84815.Go to page Start 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 End