WP7774 h1sush2a OSS fiber replacement
| serial number | cable label | |
| old | UA10490001.A | h1sush2a |
| new | UA10510002.A | h1sush34 |
which leads to the question if h1sush34's cable was on top of the rack, what is h1sush34 using
| serial number | cable label | |
| h1sush34 | UA11040002.A | no label |
There is a spare OSS fiber at h1oaf0 following a past upgrade
| serial number | cable label | |
| old | UA12110005.A | h1oaf0 |
| new | UA12120006.A | ONESTOP 2 |
For all the front end computers, their OSS cable has the computer name as its label except for the following:
| host | OSS cable label |
| h1lsc0 | no label |
| h1oaf0 | ONESTOP 2 |
| h1sush2a | h1sush34 |
| h1sush34 | no label |
| h1susauxh34 | no label |
And finally on the top of the MSR rack, there are the following OSS cables
|
h1susauxh34 (good spare?) |
| ONESTOP 1 (good spare) |
|
ONESTOP 3 (good spare) |
| no label (good spare) |
| h1oaf0 (behind h1oaf0, possibly bad) |
| h1sush2a (behind h1sush2a, possibly bad) |
WP7765 CDS WAP configuration standardization
Dave, Carlos:
All 6 CDS WAPs (wireless access points) now share a common networking configuration.
WP7774 Replacing h1sush2a One Stop fiber
Richard, Dave:
As part of the investigation into h1sush2a's recent instability, we replaced the One Stop fiber for a spare line today. Details in separate alog.
WP7770 ISI-HAM[2,3] GS13 cable and model switching
Hugh, Dave:
New models for h1isiham[2.3] were installed to match the GS13 field cabling changes made today. Also the updated BIO parts were added to the models.
WP7749 Removal of temporary GS13 fast channels from frame
Hugh, Dave:
New h1isiham[2,3,4] models were installed which remove the temporary GS13 DQ channels from the frame (six per model).
Vacuum Controls end station ion pump addition
Patrick, Dave:
h0vacey was modified to add IP17, h0vacex was modified to add IP18. A new INI file was created for each system.
Slow Controls Wind Fence channels added to h1ecaty1plc1
Patrick, Dave:
h1ecaty1plc1 was modified to add its wind fence channels. A new INI file was created.
DAQ Restart
Dave:
The DAQ was restarted at 13:07 PDT to support:
h0vacex and h0vacey new IP channels.
h1ecaty1plc1 new wind fence channels.
h1isiham[2,3,4] removal of temporary GS13 channels.
TVo, Danny
To get a better idea of how the picomotor movements effect the movement of the Hartmann beam across the ITM, we decided to move them by a larger amount. To make sure there isn't any clipping I went out to the HWS table and removed the Hartmann plate to view the beam on the ccd while moving.
The following moves were made:
ITMX upper periscope mirror: 700 counts to the right
ITMX lower periscope mirror: 500 counts to the right
ITMY upper periscope mirror: 500 counts to the left.
Attached are the current picomotor settings.
A ring heater test will be coming soon.
TVo, Georgia, Danny
After a discussion at the commissioning meeting about using CO2X for a contrast defect measurement, we moved the Hartmann beam for ITMX back to where it was before this comment in order to make an attempt at centering CO2X sometime tomorrow. The plan is to do a contrast defect measurement and have CO2X (about) centered sometime before Friday so we can use CO2X to improve it on Friday.
WP 7773 The PLC code on h0vacex has been updated to add IP18. The PLC code on h0vacey has been updated to add IP17. I also took the opportunity to split the PLC code for the BPG 402 gauges into separate revisions to address the problem I noted in alog 43341. The high voltage has been turned back on at both end stations. I burtrestored both to 6 am today.
We updated the L2P FF filter in BS M1 stage.
The resultant M1 L drive to BS oplev pitch TF is shown in the first attached image. The blue curves were for the old L2P FF (only a scalar with gain 0.002), and the red ones were for the new, freq-dependent FF at the M1 stage.
The measured FF filter = L2P/P2P appeared to be quite hard to fit, partly due to that I did not took a long enough measurement to integrate for good SNR. Thus for now we only focused on the main SUS resonance at ~ 0.5 Hz, and the microseismic band ~0.2-0.3 Hz, while sacrificing the earthquake band < 0.1 Hz. It should be fine in the full lock state when we could relying on the feedback to handle the <0.1 Hz band, but whether the current FF would be beneficial for the lock acquisition would still need to be tested.
Somehow in the coherence plot (top-right) the reduction in the main sus resonance was not apparent (it might be due to the fact that the DTT TF is a biased measurement, as the measurement noise term would not vanish in the auto-correlations used for computing coherence; see, e.g., Evan Hall's thesis, Appendix A). Nonetheless in the TF plot (top-left) we could see roughly an order of magnitude reduction at 0.5 Hz. The measurement used to fit the TF was done with the oplev damping off, and the attached plot showed the result with the oplev on. Thus it seemed that the FF should work in either case.
In the FF_fit_vs_data.pdf we show the fitted TF (blue) and the data (orange). The foton filter we use currently is:
zpk( [ 0.000000e+00+i*0.000000e+00; -1.400000e-01+i*0.000000e+00; -2.043560e+00+i*0.000000e+00; 1.348996e+00+i*0.000000e+00; -1.028492e+00+i*8.718815e-01; -1.028492e+00-i*8.718815e-01; ], [ -5.000000e-03+i*0.000000e+00; -2.000000e-01+i*0.000000e+00; -1.720109e+00+i*0.000000e+00; -1.734806e+00+i*0.000000e+00; -2.301921e+01+i*0.000000e+00; -1.335285e-01+i*2.691426e+00; -1.335285e-01-i*2.691426e+00; -2.199115e+01+i*3.808979e+01; -2.199115e+01-i*3.808979e+01; ], 4.584153e+02 )
I've updated the Actuator Tuning Spreadsheet accordingly (remember to switch from personal google account to ligo.org authentication in order to view). Thanks Hang!
After the restart of h0vacey, PT423 did not engage. While we wait for a cosmic ray to trigger this gauge, I've bypassed it from the cell phone alarms system. This will be standard procedure following code restarts, providing the bypass period overlaps with the operator's shift (i.e. no unattended bypass period).
Bypass will expire:
Tue Aug 14 15:48:54 PDT 2018
For channel(s):
H0:VAC-EY_Y1_PT423B_PRESS_TORR
PT423 is now active, bypassed has been turned off.
WPs 7770, 7749, FRS 11049. DaveB, RichardM, JimW, HughR
Conclusion--Yes the model and the hardware were at cross purposes as Interface Chassis 1 had GS13s corners 1 & 3 while the BIO switching via the model thought it was corners 1 & 2.
Details:
Rewired the interface chassis for HAMs 2 & 3 to have corners 1 & 2 GS13s to chassis #1 and corner 3 to go to chassis #2 (switched cables 2 & 3.) Rewired the top level models for HAM2 & 3 to reflect this field wiring change. Dave also swapped out the deprecated digital IO cds RCG part with the current latest version. Removed the GS13INF_OUT channels from the DAQ list in the common model and the one occurrence of "DACKILL", an annotation element. There should be no more user model DACKILL parts.
After Dave rebuilt, checked etc, and the model was restarted, ran the ISIs in DAMPED mode and toggled each digital filter on the GS13s. No problematic wildness occurred. Then ISOLATED the platform and used the commands scripts to toggle the filters--all good. Finally, changed the Guardians to include the GS13 switching--the GS13s switch to high gain whitening off after isolating and switches back when deisolating or tripped. Exercised the platforms via the guardian and no issues; the GS13 change state with out bothering the platform much less tipping them violently.
Finally.
Haocun Nutsinee Daniel
We set up the mechanical shutter in front of the CLF photodetector. With the threshold at 0.5V, it triggers around 10mW.
Some cables/optics/etc. needed to be added and adjusted. It also required a configuration change in TwinCAT for Shutter_H.
We've been able to lock (on RF) several times tonight, but each lock only lasted a few minutes.
I started the ETMX ring heater test, but another EQ is starting just now.
This afternoon I switched on the EFM chassis for the first time since Fil fixed the gain.
The Y axis, which used to have high noise at high frequency, is now very quiet, see first screenshot. I'm not sure why this is the case.
I also had a look at the time series over 4 hours after turning on the EFM, see second screenshot, the noisy parts are when the ETMX ESD actuators are used while the commissioning team acquire lock. This noise is seen in both X and Y axes.
Hi Georgia, I am not quite sure I follow all of this, but I am interested. I see a few plausible explanations relating to changing the machine states that may explain a shift in the noise spectrum, but I could be missing your point. At this point, are you thinking there could be a malfunction in the electronics chain somewhere? I can dig into this further tomorrow and generate zero field noise spectrum if you find it useful. Please let me know if there’s anything I should be working on relating to this issue.
Hi Rich,
Sorry there was a typo in my alog which might have caused confusion: I meant to say turned on the EFM, not turned the EFM.
I don't understand why the Y axis spectrum has quieted down, perhaps we fixed an electronics problem we didn't know we had? Or something with high Q has finally rung down? Since it is still sensitive to electric fields, I'm not sure there is an issue.
With the magnetic injection system that we currently have, we must inject lines or combs in order to see the magnetic coupling in DARM in a reasonable time. We would like to probe more of the coupling spectrum using bands rather than lines, especially since the coupling functions are more complex now that coupling is dominated by cable and connector coupling instead of coupling to permanent magnets. In order to inject larger fields we have prototyped a large coil.
The coil is a rounded square 16’ feet on edge that is bent around the corner of the wall in the LVEA. The coil is about 30m +X and 30m +Y of the vertex (Figure 1). The coil consists of about 5000’ of 10 gauge plastic-insulated copper wire, giving 80 turns and 5 ohms of resistance. The coil is held by four 90-degree-turn cable tray segments attached at studs, and two bars that extend out from the corner of the wall at the top and bottom. We wound the coil from the ground using a system illustrated in this video: https://youtu.be/OdJbYw1uyow
Figure 2 shows that we were able to produce several times greater fields at the vertex than for our standard PEM injections, even though the big coil was further away than the 1m coil for the standard Y-manifold PEM injections.
Figure 3 shows broad band injections with the 5m coil that are, in some frequency bands, comparable in amplitude to the comb injected by the 1m coil.
Philippe N., Kara M., Richard M., Mark D., Tyler G., Robert S.
Georgia, TVo, TJ, Danny
According to the prism values it appears we are better overall (relative to the 8-7-2018 and 8-8-2018 measurements alog 43325) :
| Horizontal displacement from ITM center (mm) | Vertical displacement from ITM center (mm) | |
| ITMX | 39 | 5 |
| ITMY | 24 | 18 |
Attached are gifs display the heating up and cooling down. (There appear to be no visible particulates on the ITMX image anymore)
Also attached is the prism and spherical power trend data.
The PEM corner station AA chassis have some dead channels and will need to be removed for repair: Channel 7 (bottom chassis) - (MIC EBAY) Channel 2 (bottom chassis) - (MIC HAM7) Channel 29 (2nd from bottom chassis) - (MIC INPUTOPTICS/HAM2) Cables will be run for accelerometers in the following locations this Tuesday: HAM 1 - X, Y, Z (top) HAM 2 - X HAM 5 - Y, Z (top) HAM 6 - Y BSC 2 - X, Z (bottom) BSC 3 - Z (bottom)
Due to a misunderstanding, the cables didn't get pulled today. They will be pulled next Tuesday unless opportunity knocks before then.
BTW: h1sush2a stopped running at 13:19 UTC today (06:19 PDT), just in time for maintenance.
model restarts logged for Tue 14/Aug/2018
2018_08_14 10:32 h1iopsush2a
2018_08_14 10:32 h1susmc1
2018_08_14 10:33 h1iopsush2a
2018_08_14 10:33 h1susmc1
2018_08_14 10:34 h1susmc3
2018_08_14 10:34 h1suspr3
2018_08_14 10:34 h1susprm
2018_08_14 10:37 h1isiham2
2018_08_14 10:37 h1isiham3
2018_08_14 13:00 h1isiham4
2018_08_14 13:05 h1isiham4
2018_08_14 13:09 h1broadcast0
2018_08_14 13:09 h1dc0
2018_08_14 13:09 h1fw0
2018_08_14 13:09 h1fw1
2018_08_14 13:09 h1fw2
2018_08_14 13:09 h1nds0
2018_08_14 13:09 h1nds1
2018_08_14 13:09 h1tw0
2018_08_14 13:09 h1tw1