Sheila, Jenne, Gabriele, Craig, Hang
We moved the input beam to the POP_A QPD (the ASC one, PRM->PR2->POP_A) by moving the IM4, while compensating the alignment to XARM by moving PR2. The motivation is that we have not changed the alignment to POP_A since O2 and it may thus serve as a reference point for our alignment.
After the input beam centered onto the POP_A QPD, we then moved the ITMY with a combination of green WFS & human servo actuating on the ETMY and TMSY to move the YARM axis overlapping with the input. We also moved the on table alignment to keep the ALS COMM beatnote ~ -2 dBm, and ALS DIFF ~ -14 dBm.
In the Guardian, we modified the ALS green alignment setup so that both ETM and TMS are actively controlled during lock acquisition ('NO_SLOW_W_GR_WFS').
We now have ALS + PRMI locked with the input beam also on the POP_A.
HAM4 actuators are tripping pretty about every 10 minutes for the last hour or so. While there are people in the LVEA it seems unlikely to be related. Attached is a plot of one of the trips.
In the second attachment you can see that something seems to have broken around 6 am this morning (around 13 UTC July 27th). There is a narrow line at 54.0 Hz (3rd attachment).
The last attachment shows that the 54Hz line doesn't show up now that the platform is damping.
The fact that this line is so narrow and present in both the gs13s (on St1) and l4cs (on St0) makes me think this is likely electronic. The same line is not present in the hepi l4cs (kind of hard to see on my attached plot, but it's not visible below the legend, and dtt is too unstable and annoying to try again over ssh). I connected with my ubikey and was able to get the isi on and running stably (for 1.5 hours so far) just by turning off the St0 l4c ff path. We should try power cycling some chassises and/or restarting the whole computer tomorrow.
Thanks Jim (and Betsy) .
HAM4 is still isolated, so it seems like this is a good solution for now. I opened an FRS ticket 11177
TITLE: 07/27 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:
14:50 Jeff B out to LVEA to take pictures
15:43 Vanessa out to LVEA
15:46 attempting initial alignment
16:00 TJ shuttering ALS-X and turning off ITMX oplev to get a look at CO2-X situation
16:20 Shutters back open and oplev back on - Green alignment is good
16:28 TJ going back out to LVEA to close shutter again - ALS-Y at TJ's request
16:45 Tour group in CR
17:03 ALS-Y shutter back to OPEN
17:06 Jeff B back
17:51 Marc out to MY
18:27 Evan taking a couple out to LVEA for a tour
18:58 Evan and co back
19:33 Patrick and Fil out to CER to troubleshoot OPO Beckhoff
19:34 Sheila out to LVEA - ISCT1
19:49 Patrick and Fil back
20:07 Haocun out to LVEA-SQZ table
20:57 Sheila and Craig back
21:02 Georgia and TJ out to HWS table
21:02 Dave out to ISCT1 workstation
22:00 TJ and Georgia back
22:06 Craig out to LVEA
22:14 TJ and Georgia out to LVEA
22:25 Dave and Jonathan taking workstation back out to ISCT1
22:32 TJ and Georgia back
22:37 Jonathan and Dave back
Yesterday, Sheila and I gathered the information on the measurements of seed mode (see 43084), and got the conclusion that the seed waist is 556um at 3m before the upper periscope mirror.
Then I measured the beam mode profile coming out from the LO fiber coupler, which is divergent with waist 188um at 1.12m before the fiber coupler (Beam fitting as attached.)
If the estimation from the measurements is good enough, a potential mode matching solution is shown as below (I hereby copied the layout and labels from LLO):
For future use, I attached the alm matlab code of the mode matching solutions that can reproduce the graphs.
I will begin to install lenses and place them to rough positions without the seed beam.
I found that the Homodyne filters have already been added, including anti-whitening and calibration ones.
TITLE: 07/27 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 4mph Gusts, 3mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.07 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
CO2 -X is RED
Danny has a script running on ZOTWS9 that will run the ITM ring heaters with 3W of power for 30 minutes starting at 07:00 UTC.
Script is found at userapps/tcs/common/scripts/ring_heater_schedule_TJ.py
Note: the duration argument is in hours!
TJ, Georgia
The results of last night's ring heater test are attached. The figures show comparisons between a cold ITM and an ITM after 30 mins of 3W ring heater exposure.
ITMY HWS beam looks misaligned in pitch, we can actuate on the top periscope mirror picomotors and try to take this image again to compare.
ITMX is problematic... There is a clearly defined ring present in the left plot which we initially thought to be the ALS green light leaking onto the HWS, but it is there even during times when the ALS is shuttered. Perhaps there is some clipping of the HWS beam on the table. We tried to check the camera image (HWS with no array plate attached) again, note in alog 43078 there was a second brighter spot that we thought maybe we could remove with an iris. However we had problems streaming, we rebooted h1hwsmsr1, but then had problems with the run_HWS.py script and now the camera is "not accessible"... TBC.
TITLE: 07/26 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:
15:30 Started working on Green arm alignment
17:00 Patrick to EX to take measurements
17:09 Daniel ad TJ out to HWS table
17:28 Kyle out to LVEA
17:46 TJ and Daniel back
17:46 Sheila and Haocun out to LVEA to take measurements
18:00 Sheila and Haocun back
18:01 Mark and Tyler out to EX to retrieve a valve on the floor under the BSC
18:03 Patrick back
18:08 Marc and Fil out to MY
18:09 Dave out to CER
18:25 Marc and Fil back
18:29 Jenne ad Hang out to ISC rack in LVEA
18:30 Sheila out to LVEA w/Jenne and Hang
18:51 Dave back
19:54 Lockloss at ALS Diff - it had been there for about an hour
20:08 Haocun out to LVEA
21:03 Sheila Craig and DS out to LVEA-ISC racks
21:23 Cheryl out to PSL ante room to retrieve EOM
21:30 Kyls out to LVEA to close a few NEG isolation valves WP #7734
21:40 Jenne, Craig and DS back.
22:28 Kyle back
Kyle, Gerardo
We don't like how flat the pressure has been at the corner station since being combined with the arms following the post O2 in-chamber de-install/install activities. As such, I confirmed that the Vent/Purge valves were fully closed. Today, the NEG1, NEG2 and NEG3 pumps were individually valved-out for 25 minutes or so each. The responses are attached. Next, we would like to verify that the 1 1/2" AMV pump port valves located atop the 2500 L/s ion pumps are fully closed and maybe repeat today's exercise with the 2500 L/s ion pump isolation valves.
[Commissioners]
Work still in progress, but we just locked ALS COMM and DIFF, moved them off resonance, and were able to acquire DRMI lock. This is the first time for us since late 2017, so we're pretty happy!
Other actions:
We altered the COMM and DIFF PLL offsets in guardian so now ISC_LOCK can get through CHECK_IR by itself. Diff offsets are not very robust. We were able to close MICH and INP1, but not PRC2. Fixed some ENGAGE_DRMI_ASC guardian code to engage both pitch and yaw LOCK filter modules for PR2 and SR2 (was only engaging pitch FMs, which was causing our instant locklosses when engaging PRC2). Now PRC2 is just regular-old unstable.
Jim and I noticed this happening again...
Sheila, Hang, Jenne, Craig We are still baffled by our low PRMI gains according to POPAIR_B. We decided to do two OMC scans, one single bounce and one with PRMI locked, to get a second opinion of our PRMI alignment.Results
Measured 45 MHz Power Recycling Gain ~ 30 Modeled 45 MHz Power Recycling Gain = 48 This seems to indicate something is weird with POPAIR_B and not our alignment. Big if true.Details
OMC facts can be found from Koji. The most important fact for us is OMC FSR = 264.8 MHz. Plot 1 shows our single bounce OMC scan, while plot 2 shows the PRMI locked scan. We scanned the OMC by moving the PZT rail-to-rail at a constant rate over 200 seconds and read out OMC DCPD SUM milliamps. Both plots are calibrated from time to frequency using the OMC FSR between the two largest peaks. The tall clean peaks in the first plot are carrier, with visible 9 and 45 MHz sidebands. The sideband frequencies don't quite match up with peaks but our PZT isn't exactly linear so close enough. The 45 MHz sideband appeared in the OMC DCPD with 0.03 mA. The peaks in the PRMI locked scan are the 45 MHz sidebands. They are not balanced: 54% of the 45 MHz power is in the lower sideband:PRMI Max OMC DCPD -45 MHz = 0.79 mA +45 MHz = 0.67 mAHere we calculated the PRMI recycling gain from first principles.where
Then we estimated our current recycling gain from the measurement ratio of PRMI 45 MHz/singleBounce 45 MHz:
For single bounce:
Some cavity math:
Yields:
Transmission Ratios:
PRMI -45 MHz/Single Bounce 45 MHz: 25.8351036066 PRMI +45 MHz/Single Bounce 45 MHz: 22.1094695082PRMI Power Recycling Gains:-45MHz = 33.36 +45MHz = 28.55
Conclusion:
There are three ways we can try to estimate PRMI gains: OMC scans (PRMI compared to single bounce), ASC POP sum/IM4 trans sum, and POPAIR B 2F signals. The OMC scan Craig describes above is the most reliable, and indicates that we have been fooled by POP90 into thinking that our recycling gain is much worse than it really is.
Details:
| May 26 2018 2:50 UTC | June 21 2018 10:00:00 UTC | July 25 18:07 UTC | |
| POPAIR B 18 I NORM (counts) | 50 | 27.5 | 7 |
| POPAIR B 90 I NORM (counts) | 75 | 40 | 19.4 |
| IM4 TRANS SUM (uW) | 54.9 | 272.3 | 279.6 |
| ASC POP A SUM/ IM4 TRANS SUM (uW/uW) | 4.7% | 6% | 2% |
| POP 18 demod RF MON (dBm at input to demod) | -49.5 | -41 | -49 |
| POP 90 demod RF MON (dBm at input to demod) | -46.2 | -38.4 | -46 |
ASC POP is unreliable because we are falling off the diodes. We don't want to pico to center ASC POP because this is one of our few alignment references from O2 that has not changed.
Yesterday's OMC scans indicate that we have 62% of the maximum possible build up for 45 MHz. This implies that something has gone wrong with POPAIR B (clipping, or something electrical) between May and now. If we scale the recycling gain measured last night to POP 90 we would infer that the recycling gain ifor 45 MHz in May was 115, or 2.5 times higher than what we think is the maximum possible.
Thanks to Anamaria for suggesting that we try the OMC scans.
Some clarification of the PRMI 45 MHz gain calculation: I referenced Kiwamu and Daniel's aLIGO paper for some numbers, in particular the Schnupp asymmetry of 4 cm. PR2 and PR3 transmission losses were not included.where
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Craig, Sheila, Matt, Lisa
We went through an inital alignment and locked PRMI. The build ups are about a factor of 3 lower than what we had in May, so we tried walking the alignment around a lot.
For the initial alignment we had to do a few things:
Once we saw that our build up was not good, we decided to try to bring the beam back onto the POP QPDs (We think that this path was not modified during the vent, we used to be on the QPDs and now we are too high). We moved IM4 to center in pitch on POPA, and then moved the X arm to get the green and red co-aligned. This resulted in worse build ups in PRMI.
We can see something on the PR2 camera, which could be scatter but we can't be sure what it is. We attempted to minimize the camera sum after Matt adjusted the mask to zoom in on these spots, but this also resulted in lower build ups.
We started a VCO scan in single bounce with the OMC locked at 1216361323+60
This is for a whistle investigation. It will run for 12 hours. If you want to stop it from moving the IMC VCO in the morning, you can quit the matlab script running on opsws13
Edit: It looks like this ran from about 6:11 UTC July 22nd to about 15:50 UTC.
For future reference, we had a PRMI lock with the beam on the POPA QPD at 5:38:57 UTC on July 23 2018