TITLE: 01/27 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 154Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY: One lockloss this shift, but otherwise a quiet day. H1 has been locked and observing for almost 5 hours.
LOG:
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17:16 | SAFETY | LASER HAZ | LVEA | YES | LVEA is Laser HAZARD | Ongoing |
19:09 | PEM | Robert | LVEA | - | Viewport pictures | 19:34 |
TITLE: 01/27 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 154Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 4mph Gusts, 3mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.14 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Sun Jan 26 10:05:46 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 5min 43secs
TCmins [-87C, -51C] OAT (-1C, 30F) DeltaTempTime 10:05:55. Note TC-B didn't reach its minimum plateau.
Lockloss @ 17:57 UTC - link to lockloss tool
Usual signs of an ETMX glitch on this lockloss, otherwise cause not obvious. Ends lock stretch at just over 4 hours.
H1 back to observing at 19:41 UTC. Helped PRM and SRM during DRMI locking, but otherwise the process was automatic.
I also loaded VIOLIN_DAMPING to take in the new ETMY mode 20 damping setting (gain of 0).
TITLE: 01/26 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 7mph Gusts, 5mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.15 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Two locklosses overnight, but H1 again relocked itself each time without issue. H1 has been locked and observing for 2 hours.
TITLE: 01/26 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 158Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: The coherence checked yielded lots of CHARD_Y, MICH & SRCL. MC2 and ITMY cameras are blue from Roberts viewport work. We've been locked for ~4.5 hours.
LOG:
Start Time | System | Name | Location | Lazer_Haz | Task | Time End |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
17:16 | SAFETY | LASER HAZ | LVEA | YES | LVEA is Laser HAZARD | 16:35 |
01:11 | PEM | Robert | LVEA | Y | Viewport pictures | 01:41 |
I was also getting a DIAG_MAIN message about "Noisy BSC CPS on: ITMY, ST1, V2" (SEI).
TITLE: 01/26 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ryan C
SHIFT SUMMARY: Mostly quiet shift aside from regular calibration sweeps and a lockloss this afternoon. H1 just finished initial alignment and is starting lock acquisition.
TITLE: 01/26 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 17mph Gusts, 12mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.03 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.14 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Lockloss @ 23:11 UTC - link to lockloss tool
As usual, no obvious cause for this lockloss, but there's evidence of an ETMX glitch right before it. Ends lock stretch at almost 11 hours.
01:23 UTC Observing
Following instructions from the TakingCalibrationMeasurements wiki, this morning I ran the usual broadband PCal and Simulines sweeps.
Broadband PCal: 19:30:44 to 19:35:54 UTC
Simulines: 19:36:46 to 20:00:29 UTC
File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/DARMOLG_SS/DARMOLG_SS_20250125T193648Z.hdf5
File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/PCALY2DARM_SS/PCALY2DARM_SS_20250125T193648Z.hdf5
File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L1_SS/SUSETMX_L1_SS_20250125T193648Z.hdf5
File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L2_SS/SUSETMX_L2_SS_20250125T193648Z.hdf5
File written out to: /ligo/groups/cal/H1/measurements/SUSETMX_L3_SS/SUSETMX_L3_SS_20250125T193648Z.hdf5
H1 was out of observing from 19:30 to 20:01 UTC.
Sat Jan 25 10:10:10 2025 INFO: Fill completed in 10min 6secs
TCmins [-94C,-93C] OAT (1C,33F), deltaTempTime 10:10:12
TITLE: 01/25 Day Shift: 1530-0030 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 137Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Tony
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 9mph Gusts, 6mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Two locklosses overnight, but looks like H1 was able to recover well enough each time. H1 has now been locked for just over 3 hours, and calibration sweeps are scheduled for 19:30 UTC.
TITLE: 01/25 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Tony
SHIFT SUMMARY: Over a few hours I've seen the range slowly degrade as the SQZ angle slowly increases and REFL_RF6_ABS_OUTPUT decreases. (Tagging SQZ) Lockloss at the end of the shift, currently relocking at DRMI
LOG: No log
00:56 Observing
05:15 UTC lockloss (6 hour lock)
We keep losing it at locking ALS, something makes the arm start oscillating and then the wfs start working hard to fix it and we lose lock. ALS_Y can survive it sometimes. The BS is wicked misaligned now, CHECK_MICH moved it 2 urads in pitch and 1 urad in yaw.
05:15 UTC lockloss
[Matthew Camilla Louis Sheila]
There is concern that the CO2 laser proposed for the CHETA design has enough intensity noise to saturate the ESD preventing lock.
By calibrating the displacement noise projected from CHETA RIN data into counts at the L3_ADC, using the DARM loop OLG and transfer function between DeltaL_ctrl and L3_ADC, we can get a rough estimate of whether we expect the CHETA noise to saturate the ESDs. This is done by looking at the RMS of the cts/rtHz of CHETA noise at the ESD and comparing it to the 25% of saturation level (2^19 counts).
Figure 1 is the loop model for mapping the displament noise (CHETA RIN) to ESD counts, Figure 2 is a plot of the darm olg, Figure 3 is plot of the tf from deltaL_ctrl to L3_adc.
Figure 4 is the projection of CHETA RIN to the ADC counts, showing that we do not estimate CHETA is likely to saturate the ESDs.
Next steps are to see if we estimate CHETA nosie to saturate the DCPDs at different power up stages.
[M. Todd, J. Kissel]
After measuring very low values for the coherence of the channels used to estimate the transfer function from H1:CAL-DELTAL_CTRL to H1:CAL-CS_DARM_FE_ETMX_L3_ESDOUTF_UL_OUT, it seemed better to go to the calibration model and use pydarm to do this calibration instead.
After making this change, the results are slightly more convincing, saying that we still do not expect CHETA to saturate the ESDs on the ETMX test-mass, however it is around 3% of the saturation level (2**19). The python code used to make this analysis as well as accompanying plots are listed below.
We do however worry about CHETA possibly saturating the coils on the L2 stage, as the noise is around 19% of the saturation level (2**19). This will require some more thought/testing. HOWEVER, this is during the Nominal Low Noise state (pydarm models NLN), and during lock-acquistion we expect that with the additional lowpass filters for the actuation stages we could have some more wiggle room with this.
Much of this code utilizes the pydarm model constructed from pydarm_report_H1.ini found at /ligo/groups/cal/H1/reports/20250123T211118Z/pydarm_H1.ini
The details about how to use the pydarm model and the transfer functions it contains can be found in Jeff's alog
Figures:
Code:
[Edit!]
After noticing an error in the way that the RMS was calculated, I've fixed the code and updated the plots. Fortunately, this does not affect anything upstream (transfer functions and asd calibrations, etc.) but it does inform a better estimate of whether we expect CHETA to saturate the ESDs.
Updated plots:
1) !cheta_in_esds.pdf
2) !cheta_in_coilsL2.pdf
3) !cheta_in_coilsL1.pdf
For more details/summary, refer to alog 82631
I reported in LHO aLOG 82376 that there were aliasing artifacts as well as a large number of line artifacts not predicted by the offline anti-aliasing analysis. Digging deeper into these unknown artifacts, these may instead be due to the fact that DTT normally holds data as single precision. The DCPD data has a large DC component, so if the data is processed with the "Remove mean" unchecked, then there may be artifacts owing to the large dynamic range. My hunch was confirmed when I tried two things: 1. re-check the "Remove mean" option. Many of the unknown additional line artifacts disappeared 2. using the diaggui_test program, which holds data as double precision. 2a. Using "remove mean", the unknown additional line artifacts disappeared 2b. Disabling "remove mean", the unknown additional line artifacts still were gone Check out LHO aLOG 78559 for other experiences. Attached is a plot comparing the 524 kHz data of H1:OMC-DCPD_A0_OUT (red) with the 16 kHz of H1:OMC-DCPD_A_OUT_DQ (blue). We don't see any significant differences now that the additional anti-aliasing filters have suppressed high frequency artifacts. The second figure is the now updated PSD comparison before the additional AA filtering in DTT using the "Remove mean" option for the 16k data. Additional artifacts consistent with the expected contribution from aliased artifacts are visible, but now the rest of the spectrum seems more-or-less in agreement.
TITLE: 01/25 Eve Shift: 0030-0600 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 153Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
SEI_ENV state: CALM
Wind: 16mph Gusts, 11mph 3min avg
Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.22 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
Dropped Observing from 00:46 to 00:52 UTC as the SQZer lost lock.