patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:06, Friday 21 July 2017 (37696)
Ops Eve Mid Shift Summary
Made it back to NLN at 00:59 UTC. DARM noise appears unaltered. Observing.
Made it back to NLN at 00:59 UTC. DARM noise appears unaltered. Observing.
The plot is a wide bandwidth frequency noise spectra which can be compared to previous alog 31554. There is no significant difference.
aLOG 37455
This afternoon the ESD electronics at EY were placed on temporary power supplies. This is part of the ongoing line hunting investigation.
aLOG 37666
Looked at the BS UR signal as reported by Jenne. Disconnected noise monitor outputs of coil driver and shorted the inputs to the AA chassis. From here we could see that UR has ~10dB gain difference than the other channels. Power cycled both the AA and coil driver, transfer function showed no change. Coil driver S1000355 in SUS-C6 slot U26 was replaced with S1100039. Transfer function for all signal outputs the same.
F. Clara, J. Driggers, R. McCarthy
Corresponds to FRS Ticket 8594, marked as pending for closure given this fix.
It was determined that the last interface stages of the driver section for CPB/CBN(Fast Current +/-) that feed the Monitor board weren't able to drive the downstream circuits. ICs 9&10 were replaced and the issue with the channel was resolved.
TITLE: 07/21 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ed
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 15mph Gusts, 11mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.05 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
The BS M2 coil driver was swapped. Jenne, Filiberto and Kiwamu are now troubleshooting issues with actuating on M2.
TITLE: 07/21 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
INCOMING OPERATOR: Patrick
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Shift was rather un-eventful. There was planned commissioning at 20:00UTC (see previous aLogs). The artifact from that is a BS that won't behave. Jenne is working on it with Fil, currently. Handing off to Patrick.
LOG:
As I reported in the ISC call today, the coherence of REFL_A_LF with DARM decreased in the band from 20 - 100 Hz after the earthquake, indicating that some other noise started contaminating DARM.
The attached shows the spectra and coherences before (4/7/2017 13:30 UTC) and after (19/7/2017 9:00 UTC) the earthquake, together with some other intensity monitors. The intensity monitors (POP_A_LF, 2nd loop inner and outer RINs) showed almost the same spectra except for some peaks in 6-9 Hz which are now gone. As for the spectrum of REFL_A_LF, its noise curve between 8 and 100 Hz of REFL_A_LF seems to go up and down as a function of time by 3 dB or so. However, the coherence with DARM is consistently lower than before regardless of the noise floor of REFL is elevated or not.
I conclude that intensity noise is innocent.
J. Kissel
Performed same check on ETMs as I did yesterday on ITMs with standard Top Mass to Top Mass transfer functions.
I similarly attach sneak peak screenshotss of fully processed data, but having watched the TFs go by,
The ETMs are clear of rubbing.
Left to do: all 10 of the triples, 3 doubles, and if we really care, the 9 singles.
(PS, we should get these as reference anyways, in prep for the up-coming vent)
Please ignore the difference with the black references on the reaction chains -- to save time, rather than figure out good templates for the ETMs, I copied over the ITM template and replaced the characters ITM with ETM. We know that ITM reaction chains have different resonance shapes and frequencies that the ETM reaction chains. From years of staring at these, I can tell they're fine. Again, will process these later to show how they really compare what's expected.
The main chains between ETMs and ITMs are identical, so their comparison can be treated as legit.
Data is stored and committed to svn here:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ETMX/SAGM0/Data/
2017-07-21_2004_H1SUSETMX_M0_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2004_H1SUSETMX_M0_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2004_H1SUSETMX_M0_WhiteNoise_R_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2004_H1SUSETMX_M0_WhiteNoise_T_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2004_H1SUSETMX_M0_WhiteNoise_V_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2004_H1SUSETMX_M0_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ETMX/SAGR0/Data/
2017-07-21_2051_H1SUSETMX_R0_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2051_H1SUSETMX_R0_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2051_H1SUSETMX_R0_WhiteNoise_R_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2051_H1SUSETMX_R0_WhiteNoise_T_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2051_H1SUSETMX_R0_WhiteNoise_V_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2051_H1SUSETMX_R0_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ETMY/SAGM0/Data/
2017-07-21_2005_H1SUSETMY_M0_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2005_H1SUSETMY_M0_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2005_H1SUSETMY_M0_WhiteNoise_R_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2005_H1SUSETMY_M0_WhiteNoise_T_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2005_H1SUSETMY_M0_WhiteNoise_V_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2005_H1SUSETMY_M0_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/QUAD/H1/ETMY/SAGR0/Data/
2017-07-21_2055_H1SUSETMY_R0_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2055_H1SUSETMY_R0_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2055_H1SUSETMY_R0_WhiteNoise_R_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2055_H1SUSETMY_R0_WhiteNoise_T_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2055_H1SUSETMY_R0_WhiteNoise_V_0p01to50Hz.xml
2017-07-21_2055_H1SUSETMY_R0_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
More detailed plots of ITMX, compared against previous measurements and model. Both Main and Reaction chains show expected dynamics and are clear of rubbing.
More detailed plots of ITMY, compared against previous measurements and model. The reaction chain checks out OK. This latest main chain's data set (2017-07-20) resolution is at 0.02 Hz instead of the previous measurement which was at the standard 0.01 Hz -- so it *looks* like some resonances are truncated, but upon close inspection, they're just not resolving the resonance. Not sure what happened during the (main chain) pitch measurement at high frequency, but this behavior has been present in the 2017-04-25 and 2017-01-17 data sets. The last clean undamped data set is way back in 2014-10-28; there is a 2.5 year gap in the data for this chain... so difficult to say. From my experience, I propose is that the main chain is OK too, given that data points surrounding the resonances match up nicely for all other DOFs. However, while I finish out the single / double rubbing checks (or during yet another earthquake) I'll remeasure the main chain with a high resolution and focus on getting a good pitch measurement.
More detailed plots of ETMX. I'm 10% suspicious about the main chain (M0) and reaction (R0) chain showing their first two L 2 L resonances a little stunted since these were last measured on 2014-12-22, but this may just be due to lack of coherence. But, as with ITMY above, the data points surrounding the resonances all line up nicely. My yellow flag trigger is twitchy, likely because this is the suspension with one of the worst BSC ISI ST2 longitudinal coupling (see LHO aLOG 37752). All other dynamics check out... Further investigation is needed here (sheesh).
More detailed plots of ETMY, compared against previous measurements and model. Both Main and Reaction chains show expected dynamics and are clear of rubbing.
Because we're also considering TOP Mass flags moving around (not big enough to cause rubbing, but enough to cause (a) a moment of inertia change and therefore resonant frequency change, or (b) a change in cross-coupling to non-diagonal response to diagonal drive, e.g. L to P, or V to L, etc), I also post the individual transfer functions for each QUAD, and a previous measurement against which to compare. I've taken a look through all of these, and they don't show much difference. If anything, the new transfer functions just show a more coherent TF because I've improved the drive parameters to get better SNR. Cross-coupling plots start on pg 7 of each attachment.
The # 1 chilled water pump tripped again, this time I caught it in time before it warmed the VEA, thanks to Dave B. and the alarm on my phone. This appears to be a VFD issue and I will investigate more on Tuesday. Meanwhile I have switched back to Chiller 2 which at the moment seems to be running reliably.
H1 locked for 18hr 17min
16:49 restarted the Range Integrand DTT on Video0.
Not much else to report at this point.
LLO has been trying ground STS feed forward to HAM4 (Rana's alog ). I attach some spectra here suggesting we may want to try it as well. First plot is the coherence between the ground STS and SRCL_CTRL, red and blue are during a lock on Feb 14, green and brown are from a lock this afternoon. Even though our microseism is a factor of ~20 lower than it was during the lock in February, there is still some coherence between the Z STS and SRCL. The second plot shows the ITMY Z (in nm/s) and SRCL_CTRL (don't know the units here) spectra for both locks. The last plot shows the transfer functions from the STS to SRCL, red and blue are February, green and brown are today, looks like the coupling doesn't change much even with very different ground inputs.
Many thanks to everyone at LDAS for fixing the issue with CDS SSH access to the cluster.
K. Mogushi I witnessed glitches below 100Hz around 8:20UTC on Jul 20th in magnetometer x, y and z, but I do not know the cause of it. HAM 6 (OMC) x-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_72E7D4_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png LEVA x-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_20971E_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png EY x-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_1D4533_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png HAM 6 (OMC) y-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_62EF30_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png LEVA y-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_1E6840_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png EX y-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_AA5283_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png HAM 6 (OMC) z-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_29F575_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png LEVA z-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_14CF11_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png EX z-axis: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~detchar/summary/day/20170720/plots/H1-ALL_60E63E_MEDIAN_RATIO_SPECTROGRAM-1184544018-86400.png
P. Marsh Jenne had asked to see if Delta L Ext noise in the 30-80 Hz band dropped while ETM and ITM beam spot positions were being moved this month; the short answer is no. In the attached document, the 1-100 Hz range is shown for various times during the spot moves, as compared against a reference spectrum on June 30th. The only obvious change is that some 20 Hz lines drop out between spot moves around 3:15 UTC and 3:45 UTC on June 15th but Jenne suggests that these were injected lines being shut off manually.
This is the PR3 and SR3 OSEM and Oplev plot referred to in alog 37553, under PR3+SR3 osem jumps:
PLOT 1:
PR3 PITCH:
PR3 YAW:
PLOT 2:
SR3 PITCH:
SR3 YAW:
TITLE: 07/21 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 52Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Cheryl
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.05 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
In the instance that Livingston should lose lock, I will break H1 lock for investigation of BS Coil driver and possibly ESD power supply swaps. we will take the opportunity to do investigative work on BS coil driver ad swapping ESD power supplies.
I'm checking the coil driver switching while we wait for the earthquake to ring down, to ensure that the analog switches are actually switching. Here's a rough note of my method:
* Set BIO state request to negative of the value that you want (i.e. -2 for state 2, -3 for state 3). This gives you control of the coil out filter banks (ex. H1:SUS-ITMX_L2_COILOUTF_UL). Do this for all 4 quadrants.
* Turn off all filters, so you have a flat digital TF from the excitation point to the driver. Do this for all 4 quadrants.
* For BS (only one with oplev damping), disable oplev damping.
* Take TF from coil output filter bank excitation to fastimon channel (ex. H1:SUS-ITMX_L2_COILOUTF_UL_EXC to H1:SUS-ITMX_L2_FASTIMON_UL_OUT).
* Switch analog coil driver state, retake TF, confirm that it changed as expected.
* Put state request back to positive number that it started at; this resets the digital filters appropriately.
All switching seems fine for PRM M3, SRM M3, ITMX L2, ITMY L2, ETMX L2 and ETMY L2, which is all suspensions and stages that we switch coil driver states for, except for BS M2. BS M2's UR coil is different from the other coils on BS M2.
I'm attaching a screenshot of the BS measurements, showing that the shape of the UR analog driver is slightly different in each state, and the overall gain is different by about 8dB.
I ask that the BS M2 coil driver be looked at first thing in the morning.
Looks like BS M2 UR has been like this at least since January. That doesn't mean it shouldn't be fixed, but it does mean that it probably won't help the new noise. I checked a time in January and another in early June. The noisemon and fastimon have always been lower in amplitude than the others, and have some extra forests of lines. The lines are coherent between the noisemon and fastimon, so I think they are showing real junk somewhere in the drive path. The plots show a comparison of UR with another quadrant recently, then a similar plot from January. Last, the coherence shows that the lines in the notch at 300 Hz are coherent between noisemon and fastimon, and there's no drop in coherence near the forests of lines.
Corresponds to FRS Ticket 8594 Ticket has been marked for closure given that the coil driver has been swapped LHO aLOG 37694 and the problem his disappeared.
The attached are comparison of the OMC length and oplev spectra before (4/7/2017 12:30 UTC) and after (today; 20/7/2017 21:00 UTC) the Montana earthquake.
The attached are the spectra of the BS, PR3 and SR3 oplevs, comparing before and after the earthquake. Again I don't see any suspicious changes except that the BS PIT noise floor improved by a few dB for some reason after the earthquake.
Keita and Daniel pointed out that one way to check if all of our range loss is due to subtractable jitter noise or something else, is to compare cleaned data from before the earthquake to after.
In the attached plot, the blue trace labeled "Orig" is the raw data from the 15th of July, before we (accidentally) switched to using only one DCPD. The red-orange trace labeled "CleanPostEQ" is from that same 15 July time, but has been cleaned. The yellow trace labeled "CleanPreEQ" is cleaned data from the 5th of July, just before the big Montana earthquake hit us.
The ratios in the bottom portion of the plot are the 2 cleaned spectra compared to the raw post-EQ blue spectrum. Because of this, the % improvements in the title of the plot are misleading.
The conclusion is that we definitely have some noise below 90Hz or so that is not witnessed by the IMC WFS, the PSL bullseye, the ASC Hard loops, or the vertex length loops.
I attach here another set of spectra, where in each figure the blue is cleaned data from before the earthquake (6 July 2017 04:00:00 UTC), the red is cleaned data from after the earthquake (21 Juy 2017 14:00:00 UTC), and yellow is the difference between those 2 spectra. These traces are the same on all 3 figures.
The other two traces, purple and green, are lines overlaid to help decide what kind of slope our residual is. The figure with "f2" in the name has 1/f^2 lines, "f3" in the name has 1/f^3 lines, and "f4" in the name has 1/f^4 lines.
I'm not sure what would give us 1/f^3 noise, but it looks to me like that might be the best fit. It's definitely not 1/f^4.
