Displaying reports 48761-48780 of 87833.Go to page Start 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 End
Reports until 11:06, Friday 19 January 2018
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:06, Friday 19 January 2018 (40197)
PT-120B noisy

Cold cathode pressure gauge (PT-120) read back is noisy starting ~ 11 UTC (3am local) on Jan. 18th. Not sure why.

Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (CDS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:41, Friday 19 January 2018 (40194)
Primitive Damping Loop Design for New H1 SUS OFI OSEM System
J. Kissel

I've designed and installed some primitive damping loops in the H1 SUS OFI's DAMP bank. I mocked up a plant model in Foton using the in-air measured data from LHO aLOG 39033,  copied over some basic filters from the OMs, and had foton model the open loop gain of the loops. Without any requirements or specifications, I've arbitrarily chosen a loop gain of ~5 around the resonances as a start. Once we get all electronics figured out, I'll characterize the new loops via measurement and adjust the gain / design accordingly.

Design details:
H1:SUS-OFI_M1_DAMP_L: 
    FM1 (0:100,100) -- a complex pair of poles at 100 Hz with a Q of 0.87 between them
    FM5 (cheby5) -- a 2nd order Chebyshev low pass, with a 5 Hz corner frequency and 2 dB of pass-band ripple
    FM6 (gain) -- a x200, gain only "filter"
    FM9 (PendL) -- [DO NOT USE] the plant model, to be used for offline design assistance only

H1:SUS-OFI_M1_DAMP_T:
    (Same as L, but the FM6 gain "filter" has a value of x4000)


H1:SUS-OFI_M1_DAMP_T:
    (Same as L, but the FM6 gain "filter" has a value of x50)
Images attached to this report
H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:04, Friday 19 January 2018 (40193)
Conlog crash on attempted insert of invalid JSON text
Same issue as reported in alog 40054.
H1 AOS (TCS)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:36, Friday 19 January 2018 (40192)
TCS{X,Y} beam samplers
Images of the TCS{X, Y} beam samplers.  Look okay.  Slight damage on the TCSX one at around 4:30 in the attached image.  Could be schmutz.  Not near the centre of the optic.
Images attached to this report
H1 IOO (IOO)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:58, Friday 19 January 2018 (40189)
HAM2 East door camera not yet installed, changes to the IM alignment, and signals
Images attached to this report
H1 PSL
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:05, Friday 19 January 2018 (40188)
Diode box 1 current increased
Increased the diode current for DB1 from 60A to 63.5A and adjusted the temperature of diode 3.  Laser power went from ~152 W to
~187 W as reported on the Beckhoff screen.
Images attached to this report
H1 SUS (CDS, ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:10, Thursday 18 January 2018 - last comment - 16:27, Monday 12 March 2018(40186)
After Many Moons -- H1 SUS OM1, OM2 and OM3 OSEM Systems are Functional Again
J. Kissel, M. Pirello

Marc and I sat down with the mess of wiring diagrams today (see below) in order to verify that all cables had been connected and chassis have been turned on after the several month delay in re-arranging and installing the HAM5/6 suspension electronics due to vent activity. We found a few chassis not turned on, and a few cables in the wrong place, but those problems were easily rectifiable. I've now begun the verification process that all is well with that which are easy: the OM1, OM2, and OM3. 

I had to flip the sign of the damping loops from -1 to +1 (now captured in the safe.snap SDF file), but now all damping loops are functional. I've confirmed so by taking damped M1 to M1 transfer functions, which look clean and healthy, regardless that HAM6 is still at air and the ISI and HEPI are locked. I attach screenshots of the L to L transfer function, though I took all three DOFs. I'll process them fully in due time (likely once we're closing up HAM6).

Next up -- ZM2 and OFI.

%% Details %%
Drawings used to identify cable names (which have three different naming schemes):
For SUS SR3, SRM, and OMC: D1002740-v6
For OM1, OM2, and OM3: First Sheet of D1200666-v11
For ZM1, ZM2, VOPO, and OFI D1700384-v6
For ADC / DAC connections and assignments for all of the above D1002740-v7

Data files:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/
    OM1/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-19_0101_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
    OM1/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-19_0101_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
    OM1/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-19_0101_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml

    OM2/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-18_0102_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
    OM2/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-18_0102_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
    OM2/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-18_0102_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml

    OM3/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-19_0102_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
    OM3/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-19_0102_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
    OM3/SAGM1/Data/2018-01-19_0102_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:27, Monday 12 March 2018 (40973)
Processed this data in detail finally. See attached. 

Note that this data was taken before the sign convention was identified as wrong for all HTTS in LHO aLOG 40847, so the phase does not agree with the model at DC by 180 deg. This has since been fixed, see LHO aLOG 40853 though I haven't yet retaken TFs that demonstrably confirm that all is well. We'll do so once we're closer to closing HAM6.

Also note that the individual measurement results have been processed by a revamped 
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/Common/MatlabTools/plotHTTS_dtttfs_M1.m
which plots the EUL drive to OSEM response correctly for the first time, and the plotall script,
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/Common/MatlabTools/plotallhtts_tfs_M1.m
respects the phase.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 SQZ (SQZ)
terry.mcrae@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:52, Thursday 18 January 2018 - last comment - 12:30, Tuesday 20 February 2018(40182)
ISCT6 Detector calibration

Daniel, Sheila, Nutsinee

Nominal laser output power measured (with a PDA100A) as 18 mW through a 98% beam splitter (Rp 98%). Transimpedance=1500 Ohms, responsivity=.221A/W (variable gain setting on PDA100A set to 0dB).

Green output power measured (with a PDA100A) as 2 mW through 95% beam splitter (~100mW IR -> 40mW green). Transimpedance=1500 Ohms, responsivity=.313A/W (variable gain setting on PDA100A set to 0dB).

NewFocus 1611 detector to lock laser to PSL: Beat frequency signal measured with spectrum analyser ~ -14dBm at 155MHz as measured from the -1dB coupled output on the TTFSS pre-amp. Note there is a signal decrease by around 5dB with large (squeezing) laser frequency shifts (~500MHz or more) that seems to be due to beam pointing errors on the 1611 detector. However locking signal depends on phase and is largely insensitive to amplitude fluctuations so we should be ok. Responsivity=.75A/W, Transimpedance=-10k Ohm, gain setting 0, Voltage = -1.6V.

Power to 1611 detector: .30mW from PSL + .67mW from sqz laser -> .49mW on detector after 50/50 beam-splitter. MEDM screen reads .21mW ?? If the transimpedance is adjusted to -5k Ohm MEDM screen reads correct, but I suspect something is still odd about this

Fibre (PSL) power rejected = 1.3 uW measured with a PD1A detector (2 K impedance).

Fibre (PSL) power launched = 27 uW measured with a PD1A detector from a 10% beam splitter. Disabled gain selection setting (alog 40161) has been corrected. Note the beamsplitter was changed from 2% transmission in the original drawing (BS8) to 10% transmission.

Comments related to this report
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 13:44, Thursday 08 February 2018 (40466)

I calibrated three more PDs today. Both are Thorlabs SM1PD1A. Assuming a transimpedance of 2kOhms.

CLF Rejected PD: measured 4mW through a PBS cube. Responsivity = 4.1 A/W

Seed Launch PD: measured 9uW through a 98:2 BS. Responsivity = 4 A/W.

LO Launch PD: So little light gets through the 95:5 beam splitter so I measured the power before the beam splitter, take 5 percent of that and calibrate the PD accprdingly. The measured power (before BS10) was 85um. 5% of that is about 4um. I added 30dB gain to the detector and set the responsivity to 0.07 A/W to match what it's supposed to read. 

The only photodiode left to calibrate is the CLF Launch PD.

nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 12:30, Tuesday 20 February 2018 (40610)

CLF launch PD calibrated last week before the table was craned. Power transmitted was 44.4mW. Responsivity = 0.4 A/W. 

Correction to the above comment, CLF Rejected and Seed Launch PD have resposivity of 0.41 and 0.4 A/W respectively.

H1 TCS (TCS)
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:38, Thursday 18 January 2018 - last comment - 15:49, Thursday 25 January 2018(40185)
TCS CO2Y laser tested

Turned the RF driver and the power supply on for the CO2Y laser, also connected the IR sensor, and was getting green lights for the control board. Using the PWM controller I tried to turn the laser on but wasn't getting any results on the power monitor. After double checking the power supply was set to 28V and 28A limit, and the RF driver was set to 40.68MHz, Fil and I found that the wrong RF cable was plugged in. After plugging the right one in the laser powered up in PWM mode and I was able to verify the rotation stage is working as well. Tomorrow I will check that the alignment hasn't changed significantly and that the periscope picomotors are operating correctly.

Comments related to this report
greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - 13:37, Friday 19 January 2018 (40200)TCS

CO2Y is now running in remote operation mode. The beam is dumped before the periscope though. I quickly checked the beam path and everything looks clear, although I did remove the alignment laser as it could possibly be clipping the IR camera path. When the laser proves to be running stably with the new chiller the beam dump will be removed.

greg.grabeel@LIGO.ORG - 15:49, Thursday 25 January 2018 (40276)TCS

CO2Y ran for just under 3 days before faulting out to a flow rate trip. A quick inspection of the chiller shows nominal water level and no faults indicated, so flow rate sensor is the main suspect. Also note the odd drop in the power supply and power output. Not sure why that happened.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:09, Thursday 18 January 2018 (40183)
Tested GV11 annulus volume for inner O-ring leaks
Kyle, Gerardo

It would be desirable to remove all of GV11 and GV12's external AIP plumbing to aid in the installation of a bake-out enclosure scheduled to be installed as part of the CP4 decommissioning exercise.  Today we connected a Tee having a port with a conductance-limited needle valve attached and a small turbo pump (backed by pump cart) to GV11's annulus pump port.  Bottled UHP N2 was then plumbed to the needle valve which allowed us to administer a controlled amount of dry nitrogen into the inlet of the turbo pump.  With the turbo inlet pressure at around 1 torr or so, we de-energized GV11's AIP controller and valved-in our test setup.  The net effect is that we were slowly venting the annulus volume with dry nitrogen while monitoring PT210 and PT245 to see if any of GV11's inner O-rings were then leaking this administered N2.  As can be seen in the attached graphs, we confirmed that there was leakage into PT210 side.  We allowed the annulus volume to increase into the "tens of torr" before abandoning the experiment, shutting off the N2 and letting the turbo evacuate the administered gas.  
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 PSL
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:47, Thursday 18 January 2018 (40181)
Laser power watchdogs back on
The laser power watchdogs are back on.
H1 SUS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:43, Thursday 18 January 2018 - last comment - 09:28, Friday 19 January 2018(40177)
H1SUSSRM RT SD OSEM Sensors were Dead -- Now Fixed
J. Kissel, R. McCarthy, M. Pirello

While trying to finally get around to finishing out the MEDM infrastructure for the new SQZ suspensions and the re-arranged OMs, we discovered that the RT and SD OSEMs are dead on SRM. They apparently died on Jan 10 ~19:30 UTC (about 11:30a PT). Remember, we know the problem is highly likely out of vacuum, since I was able to take successful transfer functions on Jan 3rd (LHO aLOG 40002). Much more likely -- Gerardo's Vacuum work mentioned in LHO aLOG 40090, or Fil and Liz's cable pulling mentioned in LHO aLOG 40085)

After tracing and confirming integrity and correctness of all HAM5/6 SUS cables from the AA chassis to the remote satellite amplifier, I noticed that two of the SRM (T3 LF RT SD) sat amp fault lights were on (see attached picture). Power cycling the respective SRM T3LFRTSD coil driver chassis didn't find the problem.  Talking with Richard, he suggested it was the last cable run from the sat amp to the chamber, since it's a tight squeeze getting the cable to seat properly at the feed through.

As suspected, he went out to diagnose and was able to wiggle the connection at the feed through enough to intermittently restore life to RT and SD, but didn't have the right tools to really make the connection secure, so he (or Fil) will finish out the fix tomorrow morning.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
richard.mccarthy@LIGO.ORG - 06:29, Friday 19 January 2018 (40191)

This morning I was able to remove the strain relief cover and get to the connector. The aligo feedthrough are more finicky than iligo so clear access is needed to insure the 25 pin cables are seated properly.  All OSEM signal are present on the MEDM

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:16, Friday 19 January 2018 (40195)CDS
J. Kissel, R. McCarthy

Ran a (damping loops closed) set of top mass transfer functions for a health check after Richard has properly seated the cable. Functionality appears to be completely restored. Nice work!

I haven't exported and properly processed the data yet, but the data files are committed to the SVN here:
    /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HSTS/H1/SRM/SAGM1/Data/
        2018-01-19_1618_H1SUSSRM_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p01to50Hz.xml
        2018-01-19_1618_H1SUSSRM_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p01to50Hz.xml
        2018-01-19_1618_H1SUSSRM_M1_WhiteNoise_R_0p01to50Hz.xml
        2018-01-19_1618_H1SUSSRM_M1_WhiteNoise_T_0p01to50Hz.xml
        2018-01-19_1618_H1SUSSRM_M1_WhiteNoise_V_0p01to50Hz.xml
        2018-01-19_1618_H1SUSSRM_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p01to50Hz.xml
Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 09:28, Friday 19 January 2018 (40196)CDS
Corresponds to FRS Ticket 9744.
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:27, Thursday 18 January 2018 - last comment - 17:09, Thursday 18 January 2018(40180)
Beam hitting SRM cage

[TVo, Jenne, Cheryl]

There was a lot of random walking this morning, but with cameras newly focused and pointing at useful things, we now have the beam hitting the bottom of the SRM cage.  Once we found the beam, which required moving ITMX (ITMY misaligned), BS and PR3, we walked those optics back to their good locations from last night, while also moving SR2 and SR3 so that we kept the beam on the SRM cage.  Now all PRMI-related optics are back at their locations from last night, and we still have the beam at SRM.  I realigned ITMY and we have some nice MICH fringes.  Next up will be moving the beam up onto the SRM itself, then seeing if we can either get SRMI/DRMI flashes, or maybe get the SRM beam retroreflected back to the POP port.

Attached is a screenshot of where the SR2 and SR3 mirrors need to be, to get the beam to the bottom of the SRM cage.  Note that SRM's OSEMs are being looked at by the CDS/EE team, and so we may not be able to actuate it tonight, in which case we'll start here in the morning.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 17:09, Thursday 18 January 2018 (40184)

[Keita, TVo, Jenne]

We looked at trying to center the beam on SR2 using SR3, but we think that we'd like to misalign SRM to ensure that we're not confusing ourselves a bit.  So, we'll come back to this in the morning.

Path forward: Misalign SRM, use SR3 to center on SR2 baffle aperture, use SR2 to center on SRM.  Depending on time and how we're feeling, we could either work a bit on SRM alignment to get the beam back to POP and see flashes to confirm that we're really happy with SR2 and SR3, or we could go straight to HAM6 alignment since we don't care about SRM's alignment for that work.

H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:52, Thursday 18 January 2018 - last comment - 06:17, Friday 19 January 2018(40167)
Laser trip
Richard informed me that the laser had tripped this morning.  I reset the laser without any problems.

    I increased the current for head 1 to the maximum of 60A and increased the diode temperature for
diode 3 to 23 degC.  The output of diode box 1 has taken a bit of a dive since the weekend.  So much
so that I would start to become concerned that the thermal lens in the NdYAG rod isn't what it should
be to make the resonator stable.

    At this point in time, we have two options as I see it, depending on commissioning constraints:
  i. replace the diode box
  ii. revert to low power mode
Both would take about half a day to do.
Comments related to this report
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 09:38, Thursday 18 January 2018 (40168)
I have not turned the power watchdogs back on.
Images attached to this comment
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 15:27, Thursday 18 January 2018 (40176)

Attached is a trend of the DB operating current increases, starting in April 2017.  The ongoing failure of DB1 can be seen in the large operating current increases that have been required over the last 2 weeks to keep the laser running.  The life of DB1 has been slightly extended by adjusting its operating temperature in lieu of adjusting its operating current, hence the flat spot near the end of the graph.

Images attached to this comment
patrick.oppermann@LIGO.ORG - 01:43, Friday 19 January 2018 (40187)
The power of diode 3 in DB1 has dropped by 50% of its original power. The TEC is already at the maximum of its performance.
You should lower the temperature further and observe the performance of the HPO.
The current for the diode boxes can be higher than 60A, if you enter the value directly and do not work on the plus and minus button.
The diode itself will not last much longer.
Images attached to this comment
matthew.heintze@LIGO.ORG - 06:17, Friday 19 January 2018 (40190)

If your trying to stretch out the lifetime I seem to recall that you can actually run these diodes up to 65A in a pinch

H1 SQZ
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:15, Tuesday 09 January 2018 - last comment - 12:02, Friday 19 January 2018(40071)
RF Amp measurement

Daniel, Nutsinee

Here's a quick note of what we measured out there with the RF power coming in through (and monitored via) temporary cables. These RF power drive AOM1 and AOM2. There seems to be too much loss at Pmon2 compared to Pmon1 (almost 11 dBm loss versus 5dBm loss). The cable length going from CPL to Pmon are the same. The top RF input gets its power all the way from the CER while the bottom RF input gets its power from the SQZ rack. So the difference in the incoming RF power makes sense. Not sure if the factor of two difference coming straight out of the Cpl makes sense though.

 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 12:02, Friday 19 January 2018 (40198)

Terry, Nutsinee

After realizing that the way the cables were hooked up didn't match the wiring diagram we decided to make it right once and for all. The output from the top RF amp used to drive AOM2, now it's driving AOM1 and the 2dB attenuator was taken off. The RF power measured on the table through the helix cable was 34 dB (2.5W), still within the max drive power allowed (2.9W). AOM1 (IntraAction ATM-200) diffraction efficiency is now 82%.

The bottom RF amp is now driving AOM2 (AA Opto Electronic MT200). The 6dB attenuator is still there. The power measured on the table was 33.2 dB (2.1W). The maximum power allows is 2.2W. The efficiency of AOM2 is still not great currently. The best we've had was 70%.

Displaying reports 48761-48780 of 87833.Go to page Start 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 End