Displaying reports 49181-49200 of 87770.Go to page Start 2456 2457 2458 2459 2460 2461 2462 2463 2464 End
Reports until 22:02, Friday 08 December 2017
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:02, Friday 08 December 2017 - last comment - 00:43, Saturday 09 December 2017(39706)
Modal model for the new SRC

Starting from the input beam model described in alog 30126, I expanded the modal model to include the new arm cavities and new SRC.

The optics location data is based on:
- https://galaxy.ligo.caltech.edu/optics/ for optics ROC and glass thicknesses
- E1400205 for BS, ITMX, ITMY, SR3, SR2 and SRM locations (SR2 location moved by 5cm towards the BS compared to E1400205)

While the code is a bit lengthy, it only builds simple structures describing sections of the interferometer:

SRCrt = 

    lambda: 1.0640e-06
         q: -1.8528e+03 + 4.0141e+02i
         N: 8
      dist: [0 0 24.4907 15.4657 15.7441 15.7441 15.4657 24.4907 0]
      ifoc: [-0.0010 -2.3180e-04 0.0555 -0.3113 -0.3522 -0.3113 0.0555 -2.3180e-04]
     label: {'ITMback'  'ITMlensr'  'SR3'  'SR2'  'SRM'  'SR2r'  'SR3r'  'ITMlens'}

XARM = 

    lambda: 1.0640e-06
         q: -1.8377e+03 + 4.3420e+02i
         N: 2
      dist: [3.9945e+03 3.9945e+03 0]
      ifoc: [8.9119e-04 0.0010]
     label: {'ETMX'  'ITMX'}

YARM = 

    lambda: 1.0640e-06
         q: -1.8356e+03 + 4.3599e+02i
         N: 2
      dist: [3.9945e+03 3.9945e+03 0]
      ifoc: [8.9012e-04 0.0010]
     label: {'ETMY'  'ITMY'}

Here the relevant fields are:
q: input beam parameter
N : number of optics
dist : distance between the optics (d/n if in glass, i.e. NOT optical thickness d*n, since this is only for the modal calculation); one more than optics
ifoc : inverse focal length (either 1/f for lenses or 2/R for reflective optics)1 label: label of optics
 

The cavity overlap in the model is quite good:
Mode-matching of PRC to average arm: 99.9976 %
Mode-matching of PRC to X arm: 99.9988 %
Mode-matching of PRC to Y arm: 99.9959 %
Mode-matching of SRC to PRC: 99.8424 %
Mode-matching of SRC to X arm: 99.8136 %
Mode-matching of SRC to Y arm: 99.7878 %
Contrast defect between x and y arm, incl Schnupp asymmetry, but without reflectivity imbalance: 5.0033e-06
 

Note that without the 5cm SR2 move that was just completed the SRC looks significantly worse:
Mode-matching of SRC to PRC: 96.8874 %
Mode-matching of SRC to X arm: 96.7677 %
Mode-matching of SRC to Y arm: 96.666 %

 

The code is located at /ligo/home/controls/sballmer/20171207/beamCalc.m. It uses custom MATLAB libraries in /ligo/home/controls/sballmer/lib. The library includes a number of mode propagation plotting and overlapping tools.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 00:43, Saturday 09 December 2017 (39707)

The SR2 was moved by +5mm, see alog 39265.

H1 AOS
thomas.vo@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:37, Friday 08 December 2017 (39701)
Estimating the new contrast defect

Stefan, Thomas

In light of the new ITMX and ETMs being installed before O3, Stefan thought it would be a good idea to try to estimate the new contrast defect by calculating the fundamental mode of  each arm cavity before and after the swap using data from the core optics galaxy page and propagating the beams to a common point and calculating the contrast defect via this equation:

Two methods:

- Stefan used handwritten MATLAB code,which is located in ligo/home/controls/sballmer/20171207,  takes into account the arm cavity modes and the Schnupp asymmetry.

- I used Finesse with the aLIGO design and modifying the optics to the most in-situ numbers for ROCs (attached .kat parameter file and custom function to find eigenmodes).  This model includes the arm cavities and the Schnupp asymmetry, as well as the thermal lens which is approximated at f=34.5km and the michelson length.

When looking at the contrast defect on the HR surface of the arm cavities, both models are consistent, which makes sense because its the simplest calculation.  However, when propagating the beam to a different point such as the beamsplitter, things get more complicated because of the lenses caused by the AR surface of the ITMs and beamsplitter are estimates at best.  Although there is a slight difference in the q-parameters between the two models because of these effects, the way we calculated the contrast defect is the same.

The parameters we used were as follows:

Both simulations used the same ROC numbers, arm cavity length of 3994.5 meters and Schnupp asymmetry = 0.08m

Before Swap

  S/N RoC
ITMX 03 -1939.90
ITMY 11 -1939.20
ETMX 08  2241.54
ETMY 12  2238.90

 

After Swap

  S/N RoC
ITMX 07 -1940.30
ITMY 11 -1939.20
ETMX 13  2242.20
ETMY 16  2246.90

 

Results

Finesse

Location Old Contrast Defect New Contrast Defect
ITM HR Surface 5.93e-6 3.87e-6
BS HR Surface 5.68e-6 4.59e-6

Stefan's Code

Location Old Contrast Defect New Contrast Defect
ITM HR Surface 5.93e-6 3.87e-6
ITM + Schnupp 5.63e-6 5.00e-6

In the end, the interesting part which both models  agree on is that the contrast defect should be better with the new test masses.

It is important to note that we've only really considered the modal overlap, this has not incorporated the reflectivities of the ITMs which could make a difference in the end results if they are substantially imbalanced.  

H1 IOO (IOO, SEI, SUS)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:32, Friday 08 December 2017 - last comment - 10:37, Tuesday 12 December 2017(39702)
HAM2 vacuumed and wiped - IMs are still moving around, 4 more bolts to tighten

Vacuumed in HAM2, using this combination of vaccum hoses:

The Kapton tube was class-A, so I used it to vacuum horizontal surfaces in MC3, MC1, PR3, IM1, and IM3 cages, and I did use it in contact with the metal.

I kept close track of the space under the +Y MC3 blade spring, and from this test area I can see that larger particulate are picked up by the vacuum, but smaller particulate are not, and when I wipe with a IPA wipe, the small particulate are removed.  Picture attached.

I put IM1 on EQ stops and used the vacuum to remove a large particle on the upper portion of the face of IM1, and this was successful without any contact between the optic and the Kapton tube.

I used the same technique to remove large particulate from the MC REFL periscope 2 lower mirror, which was very contaminated.  Not all of the particulate that I could see would come off of the optic, so some may be scratches that have been present since install.

Given my conclusion that vacuuming leaves small particulate, I wiped over all of the surfaces that I could reach in HAM2 from both the West and East doors.

PRM stage M2 has OSEM flags on the HR side of the tower that do not go into OSEMS, and the -Y flag has shifted out of place, and will need to be restored.

The really big story is that IM1, IM2, and IM3 shifted in alignment between 50 and 1500urad, and I have only one explanation for this, which is that the 4 8/32 bolts that hold the top plate to the side plates are loose, and will need to be tightened.

These bolts are covered by the brackets that hold the blade spring EQ stops at the top of the tower, so the brackets will need to come off to give access to the remaining 4 loose bolts.

This also reveals that the root cause of the shift I saw in IM3 after the B&K, a shift  I recreated myself by tapping with a dog clamp on the top plate, are these 4 hidden loose bolts.

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 17:36, Friday 08 December 2017 (39704)
Images attached to this comment
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 23:11, Saturday 09 December 2017 (39708)

IMAGES FROM HAM2:

  • black glass behind MC REFL Periscope 2 top mirror
    • as found - lots of particulate
    • after vacuuming (using a Kappton tube that was in contact with the glass (non-optical surface))
Images attached to this comment
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 23:25, Saturday 09 December 2017 (39709)

IMAGES FROM HAM2:

  • MC3 +Y blade spring attachment point, under the blade spring
    • first image: as found - lots of particulate, many sizes, large and small
    • second image: after vacuuming (using a Kappton tube that was in contact with the metal) and wiping with an IPA wipe
      • in this image the front area under the blade spring has been wiped, and no particulate is visible
      • the back area under the blade spring has only been vacuumed, and many small particles remain
      • there is a clear line between the area that was only vacuumed and the area that was wiped
      • from this I conclude that if the goal is to remove all sizes of particulate, wiping appears to be the best method
Images attached to this comment
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 23:40, Saturday 09 December 2017 (39710)

IMAGES FROM HAM2:

  • MC3 and PRM cages
    • PRM cage, top plate - large area with landmarks (blade springs)
    • PRM cage, top plate - same image, zoomed in to a fiber
    • MC3 cage - large image with landmarks
    • MC3 cage - same image, zoomed in to the fibers that form what looks like the letter X
Images attached to this comment
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 23:49, Saturday 09 December 2017 (39711)

IMAGES FROM HAM2:

  • vacuum set up
    • class-A Kappton tube installed on the tubing
    • the tubing installed on the tubing/vacuum hose adaptor, and the vacuum hose covered in C3
    • the vacuum setup from the class-A Kappton tube to the vacuum canister
Images attached to this comment
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 00:41, Monday 11 December 2017 (39715)

IM loose bolts, and what needs to be removed to fix:

Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 10:37, Tuesday 12 December 2017 (39732)
Opened FRS Ticket 9573.

Note, however -- while we agree that alignment pins in the cage (as suggested in the FRS) would do well to remove the slop described -- after further investigation Cheryl found much more success in relieving the pitch adjustment screws and re-engaging them on IM3. The guess is that they had been over stressed, warping both the top plate under discussion among other things. Not a solid case, but IM3 cage / OSEMs no longer moves / move when you look at it wrong.
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:28, Friday 08 December 2017 - last comment - 17:35, Friday 08 December 2017(39700)
Cheryl Still in the LVEA
   00-:25 (16:25) Cheryl is still in the LVEA working on the closeout of HAM2. She will post her LVEA exit in the aLOG when she is finished.
Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 17:35, Friday 08 December 2017 (39703)

I have left the LVEA.

I have noticed that purge air seems to be quite low, and will email the vacuum crew.

H1 AOS
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:25, Friday 08 December 2017 (39699)
Install ITM-Y Camera
   Kentaro, Jeff B. 

   We installed the ITRM-Y camera in its housing; and took a couple of test shots just to verify things were working. Monday we will start dialing in the camera and finalize the the camera mounting and alignment.   
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:06, Friday 08 December 2017 (39698)
WHAM5 ISI Final scan and Unlocked

Looks clean.  Unlocked ISI and left with covers pulled out so TFs can be run.  Have updated the positions for isolation and committed (HAMs 3 & 4 as well to svn:

hugh.radkins@zotws9:burtfiles 0$ svn st -u
        *    10241   ISI_ETMY.hughdonotmonitor~
        *    10241   ISI_ITMX.hughdonotmonitor~
        *    10241   ISI_ITMY.hughdonotmonitor~
M            15862   h1isiham4_OBSERVE.snap
M            16444   h1isiham3_safe.snap
M            16444   h1isiham4_safe.snap
M            16444   h1isiham5_safe.snap
M            15862   h1isiham3_OBSERVE.snap
M            15862   h1isiham5_OBSERVE.snap
Status against revision:  16483
hugh.radkins@zotws9:burtfiles 0$ svn commit -m "Update snaps for CPS control DC Position" *.snap
Sending        h1isiham3_OBSERVE.snap
Sending        h1isiham3_safe.snap
Sending        h1isiham4_OBSERVE.snap
Sending        h1isiham4_safe.snap
Sending        h1isiham5_OBSERVE.snap
Sending        h1isiham5_safe.snap
Transmitting file data ......
Committed revision 16484.
hugh.radkins@zotws9:burtfiles 0$ pwd
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/h1/burtfiles
hugh.radkins@zotws9:burtfiles 0$

H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:01, Friday 08 December 2017 (39688)
Shift Summary - Day

TITLE: 12/09 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
INCOMING OPERATOR: None
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:

16:00 LVEA is LASER SAFE

16:12 Vanessa and Karen out

16:28 Kantoro and Umakant to visit the roof for the view.

16:40 Kantoro and Umakant back inside and going for a drive to EX to have a look around outside.

16:43 Mark and Tyler out

17:00 Kantoro and Umakant back

17:05 Hugh in to LVEA/ HAM5 for ISI locking/payload documenting

17:12 Fil into LVEA/HAM5 for ground loop checks

H1:IMC-PWR_IN_OUT1617:22 Travis in to biergarten and HAM5

17:26 Betsy into LVEA/HAM5

17:33 Mark and Tyler into LVEA (TMDS)

17:30 Jeff B and Rakesh into LVEA to inspect cleanrooms

18:00 LVEA is LASER SAFE

18:02 Richard into LVEA/HAM5

18:05 Rakesh out

18:15 Jeff B out

18:20 Sheila going into the opticslab/squeezer bay

18:23  Chandra in to LVEA/GV4

18:36 Stefan in to LVEA/HAM5

18:37 Bubba in to LVEA

18:47 Stefan out

18:55 Cheryl in to LVEA/HAM2 for vacuuming

19:30 Sheila into LVEA w/Umakant

19:35 N out of optics lab

19:54 N back to optics lab

19:55 Bijesh into LVEA/HAM5

20:02 TJ into LVEA/HAM5

20:05 Karen and Vanessa leaving EX for Corner

20:09 Richard out

20:12 TJ out

20:18 Richard out

20:20 Bubba, Mark, Tyler, Travis, Betsy and Terry out

20:40 N out

20:52 Cheryl out

20:56 Betsy in to LVEA/HAM5

20:57 Travis into LVEA

21:03 Hugh out

21:06 Betsy into LVEA

21:09 Richard into LVEA

21:23 Jeff B and Kantoro in to LVEA

21:28 Chandra in to LVEA

21:30 Mark and Tyler in to LVEA

21:31 Richard out

21:41 Chandra out

21:52 Cheryl in to LVEA/HAM2

21:51 Fil in to LVEA/TCS tables (testing access system)

22:03 Bubba to the LVEA

22:04 Kyle in to LVEA/HAM4-5 (top of tube)

22:13 Bubba out

22:19 N in to LVEA/Squeezer

22:20 EX HEPI Pump Controller restarted

22:43 Terry in to LVEA squeezer bay

22:45 N out

23:00 TJ and Sheila in to LVEA

23:02 Fil in to EY

23:20 Hugh into LVEA/HAM5

23:25 Travis out

23:26 Chandra in to LVEA

23:27 Betsy out

23:38 Chandra out

32:41 N into LVEA

23:43 Hugh out

H1 AOS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:27, Friday 08 December 2017 (39696)
HAM5 Closeout Status COB

Betsy, Travis, Hugh

So, turns out we couldn't get the doors on HAM5 by COB because everything took longer than expected today (cable entry below) and everyone has already put in ~6 days of work this week.  However, we completed the entire list up to actualy putting the doors back on.

 

Things we did to enable doors going on first thing Monday morning were:

SR3

Pulled F.C. from HR surface, blew N2 for ~ a full min.

Unlocked optic.

Recenter some M1 flags - after 20 mins of knocking the optic around we decided they were good enough because we didn't want to risk breaking a magnet off or compromising cables again this late in the game.

Recentered M3 stage AOSEMs.

Fought with DTT and the suspension to eventually get quick TFs in all 6 DOFs at top stage - L has low coherence after 0.7 which doesn't look great, but below that where all of the peaks are, things line up nicely - PASS

SRM

Pulled F.C. from HR and AR surface, blew for ~30 sec on each.

Unlocked optic.

Took quick TFs of 6 DOFs - all look good - PASS

OSEM centerings are good.

 

Executed Exit Chamber procedure for tool sweeps, cleaning, 3" horizontal wafer placement, 1" witness optic FC removal, subsystem signoffs, etc.

Hugh unlocked ISI.

Jim will take the opportunity to run measurements on HAM5 ISI tonight.

BUBBA - YOU ARE A GO FOR DOOR INSTALL ASAP MONDAY MORNING.  I will follow up on text, and let you know if any status changes.

 

LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:18, Friday 08 December 2017 (39695)
shroud fit on GV4

[Bubba, Chandra, Mark, Tyler]

11am-12:15pm local

Test fit first article shroud on GV4 today and used west crane.

Particle count in biergarten looked ok.

Ken can reconnect power cables at his convenience.

 

Images attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:59, Friday 08 December 2017 (39693)
WHAM5 ISI Table Balance

After the cable replacement on HAM5 as BWeaver noted, I consolidated weights on a few corners where needed.  This and the re-cabling with a few more clamps added resulted in some changes to the counter weights.  But it all balances nicely now and I'll update the weight plan shortly.  I left it locked for SUS to continue and will unlock when needed.

H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:18, Friday 08 December 2017 - last comment - 14:42, Friday 08 December 2017(39689)
Shift Transition - Day

TITLE: 12/08 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Planned Engineering
OUTGOING OPERATOR: None
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 2mph Gusts, 1mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.40 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

15:07 Vanessa and Karen into LVEA

15:29 Mark and Tyler into LVEA HAM5 (doors)

15:30 lost comms w/EX HEPI pump controller

 

Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 14:42, Friday 08 December 2017 (39694)
Hugh walked me through the instructions in the wiki for restarting the end X HEPI EPICS IOC and recovering the PID.
LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:51, Thursday 07 December 2017 - last comment - 15:38, Friday 08 December 2017(39679)
HAM 4 annulus pump down

Pumping HAM 4 annuli with aux cart #5 and hung turbo. Started at 3:39pm local. After 10 minutes of pumping, CC gauge reads 4.3e-4 Torr.

Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 17:07, Thursday 07 December 2017 (39683)

5pm local:  1.0e-4 Torr

chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 13:28, Friday 08 December 2017 (39692)

Dec. 8th:  pressure 7.8e-6 Torr at noon

chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 15:38, Friday 08 December 2017 (39697)

3:30pm local:  7.2e-6 Torr

Displaying reports 49181-49200 of 87770.Go to page Start 2456 2457 2458 2459 2460 2461 2462 2463 2464 End