Kyle noted y-arm pressure rise last night. This morning I found the controller for Y2-8 ion pump faulted with error 02. Rebooted and came back at 350 V. Plugged pump into second channel and read 700 V at 0.5 A.
Marc and Richard tested the HV cable and concluded the cable connector on pump side is faulty. Marc will comment with his results.
Starting CP3 fill. LLCV enabled. LLCV set to manual control. LLCV set to 50% open. Fill completed in 40 seconds. TC B did not register fill. LLCV set back to 16.0% open. Starting CP4 fill. LLCV enabled. LLCV set to manual control. LLCV set to 70% open. Fill completed in 100 seconds. TC A did not register fill. LLCV set back to 37.0% open.
model restarts logged for Thu 23/Feb/2017 - Wed 22/Feb/2017 No restarts reported
model restarts logged for Tue 21/Feb/2017
2017_02_21 12:15 h1broadcast0
2017_02_21 12:15 h1dc0
2017_02_21 12:15 h1fw0
2017_02_21 12:15 h1fw1
2017_02_21 12:15 h1fw2
2017_02_21 12:15 h1nds0
2017_02_21 12:15 h1nds1
2017_02_21 12:15 h1tw1
maintenance day, DAQ restart to reintroduce HWS slow channels.
In response to alog34290, I updated the script that creates the channel list and the actual channel list in the autoBurt.req
Heather, Vaishali, Evan, Kiwamu, Jeff B.
DQ shifter: Beverly
During her DQ shift, Beverly noticed excess noise in the SUS bounce/roll modes beginning at Feb 22 13:00 UTC onward, and asked if it might be correlated to the ground motion (see Beverly's Wed Feb 22 DQ shift summary and attached Feb 22 plots). There was indeed a large gust of wind that hit LHO at around 13:00 UTC, as well as a degradation in alignment in the YAW degree of freedom, where the YAW signal was about 0.7 above the reference line (this degradation would also add to low frequency noise). The reason for the excess noise was suspected to be a combination of both, so Jeff made adjustments to the A2L, after which we see that the amplitude of bounce/roll modes have dropped off at around Feb 23 01:00 UTC (or Feb 22 17:00 PST), which is when we ran the A2L (see attached Feb 23 plots).
Beverly's alog entry for her DQ shift can be found here: 34364
Checked the mass centering on the T240 Deployed Wednesday, but I did not center them.
Day U V W
Wednesday 0.12 0.09 0.02V
Friday -.11 -.22 -.32
So the warm up of the springs is evident on the mass positions but it is still within comfortable range.
It will need re-centering when we put the T240 into the BRS enclosure (Tuesday.)
Here is spectra for the T240 (current ADC_0_ traces) compared to the ISI gnd STS (insulated) and from the PEM STS inside the BRS enclosure (Reference ADC channels.) I'll attribute the difference at low frequency to the un-insulated state of the T240 and when inside the BRS (maybe it will get some extra insulation then) it will compare better at lower frequencies.
I'm a bit surprised they don't agree more at the microseism but there may be a scale factor mismatch between the two seismometers. It would be good to look at the coherence between the two.
But the T240 does look better at low frequencies and is more promising. One thing I thought was interesting was the difference at high frequencies between the on-floor seismometers and the BRS-platform seismometer. The BRS-platform has three swivel-feet with ~3 mm rubber shims under them, resulting in increased motion between 10-50 Hz and maybe reduced motion at higher frequencies. Perhaps the feet could be redesigned to reduce this motion.
Here is this morning's look at the PEM T240 located on the floor next to the BRS (opposite side of the BRS to the ISI_GND_STS.
The PEM ADC is a bit unknown to me so like before when I made the PEM STS equal to the ISI GND STS by using a gain proportional to the ratio of the ISI STS/PEM STS amplitude at the useism, I now multiplied that scale factor by 5/4 (the ratio of the STS/T240 sensitivity.) If you compare this ASD with that in aLog 34381, one might argue the traces are more similar at the useism. Edit--added Coherence.
Tomorrow, this T240 will be moved into the BRSY enclosure replacing the STS that has been giving me troubles for the past few weeks.
We were already in Commissioning but then a 6.9 from Fiji rolled through.
TITLE: 02/24 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 69Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: 2.5hours lock at 70Mpc. Hopefully the earthquakes dont continue today.
TITLE: 02/24 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Another nice quiet shift other than a decent-sized quake from the other side of the hill (off north Vancouver island).
LOG:
12:31: tidal signals elevate
12:33: Lockloss due to 5.0 EQ from India
------
Actually this is another Point Hardy, Canada aftershock.
First attempt at locking up had the ASC control singals ringing up around the ENGAGE_REFL_POP_WFS step. This is a new feature to me.
Basically the DHARD pit/yaw were rung up for the first lock attempt.
Went step by step for the 2nd attempt and made it to NLN with no issues.
Just got a call in from Mike L. inquiring about whether we had a power outage on the site (we are fine). Sounds like at around 2:15am local time part(s) of Kennewick had an outage (Mike had reported not being able to see some CDS webpages (I was able to look at them from my laptop via the GC network). At any rate, luckily no issues to deal with here *knock on wood*.
TITLE: 02/24 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 68Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Cheryl
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.16 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
All is quiet on the H1 front. Cleared a TIMING error on the h1iopasc0 front end (same as last night). L1 was down and very quickly came back up 14min ago and we are back to double coincidence.
Now to go through the Ops Checksheet.
TITLE: 02/24 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Monitoring from home. Likely won't need to be addressed tonight
End Y
Y2-8
End Y
Conclusion
It looks as if the ion pump end of the cable is shorted in or near the connector at Y2-8. The cable near the end of the connector does not have strain relief and is slightly deformed. Manipulating the cable near the connector did not change the cable VSWR trace, but it did change the measured ohms slightly. More can be learned from disassembly of the connector housing without damaging the connector. This should be investigated and the connector repaired / replaced next maintenance window.