TITLE: 02/09 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 67Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Travis
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 1mph Gusts, 0mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.23 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Locked for 28hours at 67Mpc. DARM looks a bit noisier in the bucket atm, but range doesn't look terrible, I'll investigate.
Current Road Conditions: Terrible. By far the worse road conditions I have ever had on a commute here. Route 10 and the bypass were managable, but on the 240 my traction control would have to kick in anywhere above 25mph just to go straight. I followed a snow plow for a bit and that was also sliding around at times. Please drive safely and let's hope conditions improve in the morning.
TITLE: 02/09 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY: Locked the entire shift and going on 28 hours now. Judging by the 1/8 inch of ice on my car, it should be an exciting drive home. Freezing rain continues and has picked back up since my mid-shift report.
LOG: None
There have been 4 alarms about TCSY chiller low flow tonight, more frequent I would usually attribute to the known glitches. See attached 12 hour plot. It seems to be struggling a bit more than typical.
Observing for 24 hours. Light freezing rain on site but seems to be tapering off.
J. Kissel Using the canned function that produces the official sensitivity spectra for the public, /ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O2/Common/Scripts/DARMASDs/produceofficialstrainasds_O2_C01.m I grabbed the amplitude spectral density of DCS / GDS-CALIB_STRAIN and PCALY RX PD, with - C01 data from Dec 13 2016 @ 10:00 UTC for H1 (because CAL line heights have not changed all run) - C00 data from Jan 30 2017 @ 10:00 UTC for L1 (because C01 isn't ready after Jan 24th, but L1 last changed line heights on Jan 27th) and recast the calibration line heights into displacement amplitude (in [m_pk]) of all calibration lines as the stand currently in O2 for future reference. The tables below lists the function of these lines, which actuator is used to drive the lines, the frequency, their amplitude in [cts] at the the drive point, and the amplitude it displaces the test mass at its given frequency. H1: Used To Characterize C (f_s,Q_s) A (K_TST) A (REF) A (K_PU) C (K_C, f_cc) C (f_cc, t_C) Actuator PCAL SUS PCAL SUS PCAL PCAL Frequency [Hz] 7.93 35.9 36.7 37.3 331.9 1083.7 Amplitude [drive ct] 5000 0.55 500 0.44 5000 15000 Amplitude [m_pk] 4.78e-15 2.71e-17 2.21e-17 1.36e-19 2.71e-18 7.71e-19 L1: (edit-- there are several errors in the table below. Will fix by the end of the day) Used To Characterize A (K_TST) A (REF) A (K_PU) C (K_C, f_cc) C (f_cc, t_C) Actuator SUS PCAL SUS PCAL PCAL Frequency [Hz] 23.3 22.7 331.3 23.9 1083.1 Amplitude [drive ct] 0.052 400 0.08 7200 16160 Amplitude [m_pk] 2.87e-17 8.73e-20 2.55e-18 3.62e-17 5.42e-19 where the parameters of the sensing function, C, are as listed in T1600278, and the scalar gains in the actuation function, A, and described in T1500377. On the conversion between raw [m] of each data stream into [m] of amplitude at the calibration line frequency: produceofficialstrainasds_O2_C01.m runs the matlab function pwelch over the time series of the data stored in the frames, [ifo ':' subSystemTag '-CALIB_STRAIN' channelSuffix ] [ifo ':CAL-PCALY_RX_PD_OUT_DQ'] where subSystemTag is either GDS or DCS, and channelSuffix is either C00 or C01. I used all of the same pwelch/FFT parameters as are used normally in producing G1500623, except reducing the number of averages by a factor of 10 and increasing the frequency resolution, nAvgs = 10; detrendOrder = 1; windowType = @hann; freqRes = 0.01; % [Hz] percentOverlap = 50; % % Making sure that the chosen frequency resolution results in the calibration lines being bin-centered (I chose 0.01 [Hz] bin width), pwelch spits out a power spectral density in units of [(power)_{RMS} / Hz]. So to convert to (amplitude)_{pk}, I do the following (since, after a little pre-processing of the frame data, both channels are in start in [m]): sqrt( pwelch output ) * sqrt(ENBW) * sqrt(2) where pwelch output is in [m^2/Hz], ENBW is the effective noise bandwidth for a Hann window (with normalized effective noise band width NENBW = 1.5) with a frequency resolution of 0.01 [Hz] i.e. ENBW = NENBW*f_res = 0.015 [Hz], and the sqrt(2) is to convert from RMS to Peak amplitude.
Added 100 mL H2O to Xtal chiller. Diode chiller was good. Filters look clean.
TITLE: 02/09 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 69Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jeff/Patrick
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 20mph Gusts, 16mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.07 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.22 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Observing for 20 hours. Roads to the site weren't terrible, mostly slushy. Route 10 must have been plowed recently as drifting wasn't apparent. Snow has stopped falling.
TITLE: 02/08 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc INCOMING OPERATOR: Travis SHIFT SUMMARY: Covered end of Jeff's shift. One GRB alert, otherwise quiet. LOG: 21:38 UTC Ken to mid X 21:45 UTC Chandra and Kyle to mid Y 22:22 UTC Ken back 22:34 UTC GRB alert 23:09 UTC Chandra and Kyle back
Kyle, Chandra
CP4 did not complete auto fill today and timed out after 1 hour. We found that the electronic actuator has a layer of ice inside that leaked from the flex conduit (same issue that happened to two others over holiday break). We manually overfilled with 1/2 turn on bypass LLCV valve (after some manual overfill from control room). Total time was 30 min.
The actuator still works, so we disabled 24V power by disconnecting lead inside the actuator just to be sure that if/when the ice melts it doesn't short out the device. We will fix when the weather is more favorable. For now it's locked at 39% open.
Shift Summary: 18:11 (10:11) Received GRB alert, spoke to LLO Ops, both sites in Observing. In stand down until 19:11 (11:11). 20:30 (12:30) - Turning over to Patrick, as I need to leave for an appointment in town.
Here are spectra from the several STS2 seismometers we have around the site, all are on the floor except BRS PEM:
HAM2-- Just +X of HAM2
ITMY-- ~+8m +X & +Y
ETMX-- ~3m -X of ETMX
ETMY-- ~3m -Y of ETMY adjacent to BRS Housing
BRS PEM (ADC_0_9[10]_OUT) sitting on table mounted to BRS base plate, see 33387 for images.
These spectra were all taken (except the one reference set) about 1137pst 7 Feb when the Site BLRMS show little wind tilt or EQ affects.
The reference traces on the PEM EY unit mounted with the BRS were before the centering I did 31 Jan. See Krishna 33648 for the problems it had. Sadly, my attempts to center it then and as of yesterday, power cycling it and more centering, has managed to center it but has not relieved it of the glitching started on 31 Jan.
J. Kissel, H. Radkins, J. Warner We're collectively surprised that we haven't aLOGged it before, but here's a description of the DTT calibration for the STS channels (i.e. H1:ISI-GND_STS_${CHAMBER}_${DOF}_DQ) -- if you want to properly invert the inertial sensor response of the STS, which is an 8.3 mHz resonant spring with a critically coupled Q of sqrt(2)/2 (or a phase between the complex poles of 45 [deg]). We don't typically invert the response, because we typically only show data down to 10 mHz, and the impact of the inertial sensor response distorting the true displacement/velocity is minimal. Also, remember, I'm assuming that the H1:ISI-GND_STS_${CHAMBER}_${DOF}_DQ channels have their gain pre-calibrated to asymptote to velocity units of 1 [(nm/s)/ct]. (Note, it won't really make a difference, but Hugh -- at my imprecise request -- used 8 mHz as the pole frequency instead of 8.3 mHz in the plots above) Unit = "m/s" gain = 1e-9 * prod( pair(0.0083,45) ) % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] in matlab notation = 1e-9 * 6.889e-05 % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] numerically evaluated = 6.5e-14 [(m/s)/ct] % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT poles = 0,0 % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the comma!) zeros = pair(0.0083,45) % [Hz] in matlab notation = 0.005869 0.005869 % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the lack of comma!) I prefer to enter in this more simple calibration in velocity [m/s], and let DTT do the integration if I want to convert to displacement [m]. However, if you want to get straight to the punch, then you'll want to enter in Unit = "m" gain = 1e-9 / (2*pi) * prod( pair(0.0083,45) ) % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] in matlab notation = 1e-9 * 0.159 * 6.889e-05 [(m/s)/ct] % [(nm/s) / (m/s)] * [(m/s)/ct] numerically evaluated = 1.1e-14 [(m/s)/ct] % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT poles = 0,0,0 % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the comma!) zeros = pair(0.0083,45) % [Hz] in matlab notation = 0.005869 0.005869 % [Hz] what you should stick into DTT (note the lack of comma!) Happy low frequency hunting!
The attached 3 plots put the four GND STSs on common DOF graphs to better compare there performance. They are the same traces as above.
Let's start with Z. Cause it looks easy. Pretty similar between 0.010 and 1 Hz. Above that band, ETMX gets quieter or the others get noisier. Below, ITMY gets quieter.
For the Y Dof, maybe this shows how well the ITMY's location is free of tilt, even in this relatively wind free data. All the other sensors show a similar low-f response above 10mHz.
The X DoF too is interesting as the HAM2 and the ETMX data approaches the performance of the ITMY instrument: These sensors' X axes is along the long axis of the building and may see less inherent tilt. But, that would suggest I should argue that the ETMY Y axis is not performing as it should...and maybe it isn't. No matter how you slice it though, this plot suggests the ETMY X axis is not doing as well as it could. I don't think the ETMY sensor is too much closer to the outside wall than is the ETMX, maybe a little.
Starting CP3 fill. LLCV enabled. LLCV set to manual control. LLCV set to 50% open. Fill completed in 32 seconds. TC B did not register fill. LLCV set back to 14.0% open. Starting CP4 fill. LLCV enabled. LLCV set to manual control. LLCV set to 70% open. Fill not completed after 3600 seconds. LLCV set back to 39.0% open.
Ops Shift Transition: 02/08/2017, Day Shift 16:00 – 00:00 (08:00 - 16:00) - UTC (PT)
TITLE: 02/08 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jeff
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG: Still going for 12 hours, at 67 Mpc.
All seems good. almost 9hours around 68Mpc.
TITLE: 02/08 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Travis
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 8mph Gusts, 6mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.38 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Observing for 4 hours at 66Mpc. Roads clear on 240 and route 10, but a bit of snow in town.
PyCBC analysts, Thomas Dent, Andrew Lundgren
Investigation of some unusual and loud CBC triggers led to identifying a new set of glitches which occur a few times a day, looking like one or two cycles of extremely high-frequency scattering arches in the strain channel. One very clear example is this omega scan (26th Jan) - see particularly LSC-REFL_A_LF_OUT_DQ and IMC-IM4_TRANS_YAW spectrograms for the scattering structure. (Hence the possible name SPINOSAURUS, for which try Googling.)
The cause is a really strong transient excitation at around 30Hz (aka 'thud') hitting the central station, seen in many accelerometer, seismometer, HEPI, ISI and SUS channels. We made some sound files from a selection of these channels :
PEM microphones, interestingly, don't pick up the disturbance in most cases - so probably it is coming through the ground.
Note that the OPLEV accelerometer shows ringing at ~60-something Hz.
Working hypothesis is that the thud is exciting some resonance/relative motion of the input optics which is causing light to be reflected off places where it shouldn't be ..
The frequency of the arches (~34 per second) would indicate that whatever is causing scattering has a motion frequency of about 17Hz (see eg https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=154054 as well as the omega scan above).
Maybe someone at the site could recognize what this is from listening to the .wav files?
A set of omega scans of similar events on 26th Jan (identified by thresholding on ISI-GND_STS_HAM2_Y) can be found at https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tdent/wdq/isi_ham2/
Wow that is pretty loud, seems like it is even seen (though just barely) on seismometers clear out at EY with about the right propagation delay for air or ground propagation in this band (about 300 m/s). Like a small quake near the corner station or something really heavy, like the front loader, going over a big bump or setting its shovel down hard. Are other similar events during working hours and also seen at EY or EX?
It's hard to spot any pattern in the GPS times. As far as I have checked the disturbances are always much stronger in CS/LVEA than in end station (if seen at all in EX/EY ..).
More times can be found at https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tdent/wdq/isi_ham2/jan23/ https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tdent/wdq/isi_ham2/jan24/
Hveto investigations have uncovered a bunch more times - some are definitely not in working hours, eg https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tjmassin/hveto/O2Ac-HPI-HAM2/scans/1169549195.98/ (02:46 local) https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tjmassin/hveto/O2Ab-HPI-HAM2/scans/1168330222.84/ (00:10 local)
Here's a plot which may be helpful as to the times of disturbances in CS showing the great majority of occurrences on the 23rd, 26th-27th and early on 28th Jan (all times UTC). This ought to be correlated with local happenings.
The ISI-GND HAM2 channel also has loud triggers at times where there are no strain triggers as the ifo was not observing. The main times I see are approximately (UTC time)
Jan 22 : hours 13, 18 21-22
Jan 23 : hours 0-1, 20
Jan 24 : hours 0, 1, 3-6, 10, 18-23
Jan 25 : hours 21-22
Jan 26 : hours 17-19, 21-22
Jan 27 : hours 1-3, 5-6, 10, 15-17, 19, 21, 23
Jan 28 : hours 9-10
Jan 29 : hours 19-20
Jan 30 : hours 17, 19-20
Hmm. Maybe this shows a predominance of times around hour 19-20-21 UTC i.e. 11-12-13 PST. Lunchtime?? And what was special about the 24th and 27th ..
Is this maybe snow falling off the buildings? The temps started going above the teens on the 18th or so and started staying near freezing by the 24th. Fil reported seeing a chunk he thought could be ~200 lbs fall.
Ice Cracking On Roofs?
In addition to ice/snow falls mentioned by Jim, thought I'd mention audible bumps I heard from the Control Room during some snowy evenings a few weeks ago (alog33199)....Beverly Berger emailed me suggesting this could be ice cracking on the roof. We currently do not have tons of snow on the roofs, but there are some drifts which might be on the order of a 1' tall.
MSR Door Slams?
After hearing the audio files from Thomas' alog, I was sensitive to the noise this morning. Because of this, thought I'd note some times this morning when I heard a noise similar to Thomas' audio, and this noise was the door slamming when people were entering the MSR (Mass Storage Room adjacent to the Control Room & there were a pile of boxes which the door would hit when opened...I have since slid them out of the way). Realize this isn't as big of a force as what Robert mentions or the snow falls, but just thought I'd note some times when they were in/out of the room this morning:
I took a brief look at the times in Corey's previous 'bumps in the night' report, I think I managed to deduce correctly that it refers to UTC times on Jan 13. Out of these I could only find glitches corresponding to the times 5:32:50 and 6:09:14. There were also some loud triggers in the ISI-GND HAM2 channel on Jan 13, but only one corresponded in time with Corey's bumps: 1168320724 (05:31:46).
The 6:09 glitch seems to be a false alarm, a very loud blip glitch at 06:09:10 (see https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tdent/wdq/H1_1168322968/) with very little visible in aux channels. The glitch would be visible on the control room glitchgram and/or range plot but is not associated with PEM-CS_SEIS or ISI-GND HAM2 disturbances.
The 5:32:50 glitch was identified as a 'PSL glitch' some time ago - however, it also appears to be a spinosaurus! So, a loud enough spinosaurus will also appear in the PSL.
Evidence : Very loud in PEM-CS_SEIS_LVEA_VERTEX channels (https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=155306) and characteristic sail shape in IMC-IM4 (https://ldvw.ligo.caltech.edu/ldvw/view?act=getImg&imgId=155301).
The DetChar SEI/Ground BLRMS Y summary page tab has a good witness channel, see the 'HAM2' trace in this plot for the 13th - ie if you want to know 'was it a spinosaurus' check for a spike in HAM2.
Here is another weird-audio-band-disturbance-in-CS event (or series of events!) from Jan 24th ~17:00 UTC :
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tdent/detchar/o2/PEM-CS_ACC_LVEAFLOOR_HAM1_Z-1169312457.wav
Could be someone walking up to a piece of the instrument, dropping or shifting some heavy object then going away .. ??
Omega scan: https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~tdent/wdq/psl_iss/1169312457.3/
The time mentioned in the last entry turns out to have been a scheduled Tuesday maintenance where people were indeed in the LVEA doing work (and the ifo was not observing, though locked).