Checked the mass centering on the T240 Deployed Wednesday, but I did not center them.
Day U V W
Wednesday 0.12 0.09 0.02V
Friday -.11 -.22 -.32
So the warm up of the springs is evident on the mass positions but it is still within comfortable range.
It will need re-centering when we put the T240 into the BRS enclosure (Tuesday.)
We were already in Commissioning but then a 6.9 from Fiji rolled through.
TITLE: 02/24 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 69Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Corey
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.18 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: 2.5hours lock at 70Mpc. Hopefully the earthquakes dont continue today.
TITLE: 02/24 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY:
Another nice quiet shift other than a decent-sized quake from the other side of the hill (off north Vancouver island).
LOG:
12:31: tidal signals elevate
12:33: Lockloss due to 5.0 EQ from India
------
Actually this is another Point Hardy, Canada aftershock.
First attempt at locking up had the ASC control singals ringing up around the ENGAGE_REFL_POP_WFS step. This is a new feature to me.
Basically the DHARD pit/yaw were rung up for the first lock attempt.
Went step by step for the 2nd attempt and made it to NLN with no issues.
Just got a call in from Mike L. inquiring about whether we had a power outage on the site (we are fine). Sounds like at around 2:15am local time part(s) of Kennewick had an outage (Mike had reported not being able to see some CDS webpages (I was able to look at them from my laptop via the GC network). At any rate, luckily no issues to deal with here *knock on wood*.
TITLE: 02/24 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 68Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Cheryl
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.02 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.16 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
All is quiet on the H1 front. Cleared a TIMING error on the h1iopasc0 front end (same as last night). L1 was down and very quickly came back up 14min ago and we are back to double coincidence.
Now to go through the Ops Checksheet.
TITLE: 02/24 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 66Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY:
DQ shifter: Beverly
LHO fellows: Heather, Vaishali, Evan
I used an older diaggui template of mine and didn't realize it had excitation channels chosen for the IMs, so when I ran it, H1 was knocked out of Observe.
The attached plot suggests no actual injection happened, plot covers 2:48:00UTC to 2:50:00UTC.
Time out of Observe:
Excitation Channels:
Monitoring from home. Likely won't need to be addressed tonight
Replaced CP8 fuses to fix LLCV actuator after discovering actuator not responding to manual stroke.
No fuse LED indicator lights were lit at vacuum rack in EX VEA, so I needed to use cell phone while laser locked (sorry!) to text Kyle for wiring diagram locations. I replaced both fuses. Old fuses test good. Guessing that during actuator modification on Tuesday when fuses were pulled and plugged back in there was a bad connection.
TITLE: 02/24 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 67Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Cheryl
SHIFT SUMMARY: One lock loss that was coincident with an earthquake, but I'm not sure if that was the cause or not. Using the lockloss tool i looked at different SEI and ASC channels, and there is an earthquake seen, but not nearly as big as other ones that I've seen us ride through. Relocked with no issues, but our range does seem to be trending down. Chandra had to replace a fuse for CP8 at EX which is in the VEA. I left us in Observing incase she was quiet enough, but hopefully DetChar can check to make sure.
LOG:
2356 hrs UTC is when Chandra had sent out a text from the VEA
Here is spectra for the T240 (current ADC_0_ traces) compared to the ISI gnd STS (insulated) and from the PEM STS inside the BRS enclosure (Reference ADC channels.) I'll attribute the difference at low frequency to the un-insulated state of the T240 and when inside the BRS (maybe it will get some extra insulation then) it will compare better at lower frequencies.
I'm a bit surprised they don't agree more at the microseism but there may be a scale factor mismatch between the two seismometers. It would be good to look at the coherence between the two.
But the T240 does look better at low frequencies and is more promising. One thing I thought was interesting was the difference at high frequencies between the on-floor seismometers and the BRS-platform seismometer. The BRS-platform has three swivel-feet with ~3 mm rubber shims under them, resulting in increased motion between 10-50 Hz and maybe reduced motion at higher frequencies. Perhaps the feet could be redesigned to reduce this motion.
Here is this morning's look at the PEM T240 located on the floor next to the BRS (opposite side of the BRS to the ISI_GND_STS.
The PEM ADC is a bit unknown to me so like before when I made the PEM STS equal to the ISI GND STS by using a gain proportional to the ratio of the ISI STS/PEM STS amplitude at the useism, I now multiplied that scale factor by 5/4 (the ratio of the STS/T240 sensitivity.) If you compare this ASD with that in aLog 34381, one might argue the traces are more similar at the useism. Edit--added Coherence.
Tomorrow, this T240 will be moved into the BRSY enclosure replacing the STS that has been giving me troubles for the past few weeks.