Displaying reports 5441-5460 of 83253.Go to page Start 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 End
Reports until 13:36, Tuesday 17 September 2024
LHO General
tyler.guidry@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:36, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80143)
LHO Fire Drill
Per FAMIS request id 26936 an annual fire drill was performed today at 1:01 PST. All regular fire alarm systems sustained function for 5 minutes at LEXC, LSB and OSB. This included a disabling of all HVAC functions at the corner station. As such, a small temperature increase may be seen across the LVEA. I have verified all systems resumed normal operation after the alarms were disabled and system reset. Expect temperatures to correct and return to normal shortly. 

R. McCarthy, T. Guidry, E. Otterman
H1 AOS (CAL)
louis.dartez@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:25, Tuesday 17 September 2024 - last comment - 14:30, Tuesday 17 September 2024(80141)
Engaged new COILOUTF filter gains for 32bit DACs on ETMX
The IFO was kicked back to DOWN while approaching CHECK_VIOLINS_BEFORE_POWERUP during the fire alarm. I kept the IFO in DOWN for a moment while I engaged the filter modules with the 32bitDAC gains mentioned in LHO:80017.

screenshots attached.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
louis.dartez@LIGO.ORG - 13:40, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80144)
i saved the filter module changes in SDF. we'll need to revert if we end up swapping the DAC's back out
louis.dartez@LIGO.ORG - 14:09, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80145)
It turns out that the new LIGODACs were only put in place for L3, not L1-L3. I've reverted my FM changes to L1 and L2. 

Furthermore, Marc explained to me that the new 32 bit DACs are effectively 28 bit DACs so I've adjusted the gains in the L3 ESDOUTF filters to 2**10 from 2**14.
Images attached to this comment
louis.dartez@LIGO.ORG - 14:30, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80146)
From discussion with Marc, it turns out that according to LHO:80023 there is a gain of 275.31 being applied to the output of the L3 LIGODACs. This gain accounts for the difference between the 20bit DACs and the new LIGO-DAC. A screenshot showing these gains is attached. 

We are leaving engaged the gain of 4 in the ESDOUTF filterbanks for ETMX-L3 as this gain gets us from the old 10-bit configuration to the 20-bit configuration. We are *not* engaging the '32bitDAC' FMs I prepared last week since the gain of 275.31 being applied by the DACs already takes care of getting us from the 20-bit configuration to the 32bit (28bit?) configuration.

Jenne has accepted the FM changes in SDF.
Images attached to this comment
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:05, Tuesday 17 September 2024 - last comment - 13:15, Tuesday 17 September 2024(80140)
fire alarm!!!

Fire alarm. Assembling near the staging building.

Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 13:15, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80142)

Fire Drill ...
Lost lock at Prep_DC_Readout _Transition.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:36, Tuesday 17 September 2024 - last comment - 12:49, Tuesday 17 September 2024(80138)
CDS Maintenance Summary: Tuesday 17th September 2024

WP12091 Add new TEST_NOTIFY Guardian Node

TJ, Dave:

TJ created the new node and the new H1EDCU_GRD.ini. I updated H1EPICS_GRD.ini. DAQ+EDC restart needed.

WP12087 Add VACSTAT gauge channels to DAQ.

Dave:

I added the gauge metadata channels to H1EPICS_VACSTAT.ini. DAQ+EDC restart needed.

This failed due to channel name lengths exceeding 54 characters. This change was then backed out.

Verify PEM signal cabling to h1iopcdsh8 IO Chassis

Fil, Dave:

Fil verified the PEM cabling was as per h1pemh8. See Fil's alog for details.

New LIGO 28AO32 DAC driving ETMX L2 and ESD signals

Daniel, Richard, Marc, Fil, TJ, Tony, Dave, Erik, Jonathan, EJ

The 28AO32 DAC was wired to drive the SUS ETMX DAC channels which were being driven by its 20bit DACs. Existing AI chassis were used for these drives to remove one more change.

Two additional AI chassis were installed in this rack. One to keep the first 20bit DAC in a good state, the second to drive the h1susetmxpi DAC drives (last two channels of second 20bit DAC).

DAQ Restart

Jonathan, Dave:

The DAQ + EDC were restarted for the Guardian and VACSTAT changes. This was a very messy restart.

DC0 did not restart, it found that the new VACSTAT channel names were too long.

I reverted the change to H1EPICS_VACSTAT and we did a second restart of the DAQ 0-leg and EDC.

FW0 spontaneously restarted itself after only writing a few full frames.

When we were sure FW0 was stable again, we restarted the 1-leg with no issues.

The name-too-long issues should have been caught by my check_daq_channels_validity.py code. I subsequently found there was a bug in the code, and it was not checking the new DAQ INI files, rather the running version. This has been fixed and tested.

Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 12:49, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80139)

Tue17Sep2024
LOC TIME HOSTNAME     MODEL/REBOOT
08:14:57 h1susauxb123 h1edc[DAQ] <<< First EDC restart, did not notice DC0 was staying down
08:18:43 h1daqdc0     [DAQ]  <<< Effectively second 0-leg restart after fixing H1EDC.ini
08:18:49 h1daqfw0     [DAQ]
08:18:49 h1daqnds0    [DAQ]
08:18:49 h1daqtw0     [DAQ]
08:19:06 h1daqgds0    [DAQ]


08:19:15 h1susauxb123 h1edc[DAQ]  <<< second EDC restart with fixed H1EDC.ini


08:21:38 h1daqfw0     [DAQ] <<< Spontaneous restart of FW0


08:30:34 h1daqdc1     [DAQ] <<< 1-leg restart
08:30:45 h1daqfw1     [DAQ]
08:30:46 h1daqtw1     [DAQ]
08:30:47 h1daqnds1    [DAQ]
08:30:56 h1daqgds1    [DAQ]
 

H1 AOS
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:10, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80137)
FCES PEM Cabling

WP 12089

All FCES PEM cabling is now labeled. PEM sensors are connected to PEM chassis as follows:

  1. CH1 - HAM8 Microphone
  2. CH2 - HAM8 Accelerometer X
  3. CH3 - HAM8 Accelerometer Y
  4. CH4 - HAM8 Accelerometer Z
  5. CH5 - FCES Accelerometer Beam Tube
  6. CH6 - HAM8 Accelerometer Floor
  7. CH7 - HAM8 Mag X
  8. CH8 - HAM8 Mag Y
  9. CH9 - HAM8 Mag Z

Worth noting that the PEM AA Chassis shares ADC channels with the ISC AA Chassis. A special rear interface board is installed in the PEM AA Chassis.

D. Barker, F. Clara

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:01, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80136)
28AO32 DAQ MEDM widened to show full number

I've hand edited the LIGO DAC MEDMs for h1susetmx and h1iopsusex models so the large drive signals are no longer being clipped at both ends.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
john.zweizig@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:00, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80135)
blrms monitors restarted

I restarted the seismic blrms monitors and they now appear to be publishing 48 hours of data.

LHO VE
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:14, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80133)
Tue CP1 Fill

Tue Sep 17 08:11:31 2024 INFO: Fill completed in 11min 27secs

Gerardo confirmed a good fill curbside.

Images attached to this report
H1 TCS
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:55, Tuesday 17 September 2024 - last comment - 12:59, Wednesday 02 October 2024(80132)
HWS Masks Reinstalled and code restarted.

WP 12080  After turning the HWS lasers back on in 80043, today I reinstalled the masks. To get the right amount of light on the CCD camera, ITMX is set to 1Hz and ITMY to 20Hz. New references taken at 15:50UTC, 30 minutes after we lost lock, so the IFO wouldn't have been 100% cold. 

Comments related to this report
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 15:48, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80148)

HWS is aligned and working well.

Plots are attached comparing 40 seconds, 120 seconds and 20 minutes after we power to 60W input.

Comparing to March 76385, the ITMX main point absorber looks to be heating up more than it has in the past but the main IFO beam also looks a little lower and offset than March (origin cross is the same), so that could be causing the point absorber to look different. The ITMX P2L is the same as March and Y2L 0.1 higher.

Images attached to this comment
camilla.compton@LIGO.ORG - 12:59, Wednesday 02 October 2024 (80431)

Noticed the ITMY HWS code had stopped, error attached. While we were out of observing today, I restarted it.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:48, Tuesday 17 September 2024 - last comment - 07:58, Tuesday 17 September 2024(80130)
Tuesday Maintance Ops Shift Start

TITLE: 09/17 Day Shift: 1430-2330 UTC (0730-1630 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 3mph Gusts, 2mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.08 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

H1 is locked for over 5 hours  but not observing. Looks like we were taken out of Observing at 7am.
Most Likely because it's running the Magnetic injections.
Inlock charge measurements are next.

 

Comments related to this report
anthony.sanchez@LIGO.ORG - 07:58, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80131)

Work to be done today:

CDS - [ISC, SUS] EX - Swap the SUS signals from the 18 and 20 bit 8ch DAC's over to the LIGO 32 bit 32ch DAC at SUS-EX. (Marc, Fil, Daniel) WP 12079

Access Laser LVEA TCS table tour (Camilla, TJ?) WP12080

TCS - 8a to 8:15a [LVEA HWST] Reinstall Hartmann Sensor Masks On TCSHT4R HWS Table (Camilla)

VAC- [CP1 (Y Arm) / CP2 (X Arm)] Outside Work -- Radiator (or vaporizer) examination. (Gerardo, Travis, Jordan) WP12083  -- postponed

VAC- [CE/MR] Power down the ion pump controller, to then move the controller within the rack, and connect new signal cables. (Jordan, Travis, Gerardo) WP12085

New Guardian node TEST_NOTIFY. (TJ) WP12091

SEI - [EX] Recenter BRSX. Turn on picomotor, adjust BRSX adjustment mass. (Jim) WP12088

CDS- [PEM] Verify cabling for PEM sensors in the FCES. New cabling for Ham floor and beamtube accelerometers will be installed. (Fil, Dave) WP12089

8a SQZ: SQZT0 Realign PUMP AOM --Postponed

SQZ: [With IFO, Nominal Low Noise] Go to 0V psams with locked IFO turn off PSAMs driver (during IFO thermalization time). -- postponed

H1 CDS
erik.vonreis@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:51, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80129)
Workstations updated

Workstations were updated.  This was an OS packages update.  Conda packages were not updated.

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:02, Monday 16 September 2024 (80128)
Ops Eve Shift End

TITLE: 09/17 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 156Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Ibrahim
SHIFT SUMMARY: Currently Observing at 160Mpc and have been Locked for almost 3 hours. One lockloss during my shift due to an earthquake, but relocking was completely hands-off besides me choosing to run an initial alignment.
LOG:

23:30UTC Observing and have been Locked for 3 hours
01:02 Lockloss from earthquake
     01:08 Started initial alignment
     01:29 Initial alignment done, relocking
02:09 NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE
02:12 Observing

H1 General (Lockloss)
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:06, Monday 16 September 2024 - last comment - 19:12, Monday 16 September 2024(80126)
Lockloss

Lockloss @ 09/17 01:02 UTC after 4.5 hours locked from Texan earthquake

Comments related to this report
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - 19:12, Monday 16 September 2024 (80127)

02:12 Observing

H1 General
oli.patane@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:38, Monday 16 September 2024 (80125)
Ops Eve Shift Start

TITLE: 09/16 Eve Shift: 2330-0500 UTC (1630-2200 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 148Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Ryan S
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    SEI_ENV state: CALM
    Wind: 12mph Gusts, 9mph 3min avg
    Primary useism: 0.01 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.10 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

Currently observing at 150Mpc and have been Locked for 3 hours.

H1 ISC
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:17, Monday 16 September 2024 - last comment - 10:58, Tuesday 17 September 2024(80118)
PRCL tests summary

I did two different tests to PRCL today that would hopefully help improve the low frequency noise.

PRCL feedforward test:

I tried fitting a new feedforward with Gabriele last week. We saved this in FM6. However, the comparison of the injection without feedforward and with feedforward showed that the coupling was worse with feedforward.

PRCL offset test with new HAM1 FF:

I engaged the previously tested PRCL offset (alog 79989), and tried the new HAM1 feedforward I fit. Not only does this HAM1 feedforward perform better than the previous tuning, generally the HAM1 coupling is smaller than without the PRCL offset.

Comparison plot. Compare the gold traces with the blue traces. These are both HAM1 feedforward OFF times, except gold is with no PRCL digital offset, and blue is with PRCl digital offset at -58. There is improvement in the noise in CHARD P, CHARD Y, and INP1 P (left three plots). PRC2 P noise looks the same (right side, second down). Then, red shows the new HAM1 feedforward with the PRCL digital offset. The reduction is noise is the same or better than the noise reduction achieved in the previous HAM1 feedforward tuning (see alog 79799). Again, I find it suspicious that the signifcant change seems to come from the loops that use the RF45 demod signal (CHARD and INP1), while the loop using RF9 only do not change (PRC2).

I consider this test a success, and the lower noise in CHARD Y with the PRCL offset on (left, second plot down) is evident.

The PRCL offset is back in the guardian in LOWNOISE_LENGTH_CONTROL and SDFed for observe. I SDFed the new HAM1 feedforward settings in both safe and observe.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 16:21, Monday 16 September 2024 (80123)

Some other results from the PRCL offset test:

No visible change in the sensitivity: plot (there are some excess peaks because the cal lines show up in calib clean for a bit in every lock). However, the CHARD Y/PRCL coherence is gone, and the CHARD Y/DARM coherence is reduced: plot.

I trended the REFL WFS NSUM around the time of the offset engagement, and turning on the offset corresponds to a drop in REFL power: plot.

Images attached to this comment
elenna.capote@LIGO.ORG - 10:58, Tuesday 17 September 2024 (80134)

Here is more data investigating the change in power with the PRCL offset engaged.

It appears that as the PRCL offset is increased negatively towards the chosen value of -58 ct, the power at both the LSC and ASC REFL diodes decreases, and the power in POP LF increases. The offset also appears to make the REFL A LF signal less noisy. Power trend plot

Similar behavior is evident in the March test, and the March test also showed that this behavior is consistent even with the thermalization which steadily increases the power at REFL early in the lock. Power trend plot

Reminder: we chose the -62 ct offset in March and the -58 ct offset now as a part of minimizing the PRCL/REFL RIN coupling. It looks like both now and back in March, increasing the offset beyond these values doesn't much reduce the REFL power further, however we didn't take a big enough step to confirm that.

Another note: in the past we have checked the POP45 phasing and the LSC sensing matrix, but we haven't checked the POP9 phasing. These are some alogs Sheila sent me: 77289, 77416. I think we looked into this a bit, and then the OFI broke, which drew our attention more than this issue.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 5441-5460 of 83253.Go to page Start 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 End