Sheila, Kiwamu,
Tonight, we continued working on searching for the missing recycling gain. We opened up PRC1 (which uses POP_A_QPD and feeds it back to PRM) and moved PRM manually to study the effect of the spot position on PR2. This seems to work well and we were able to get back to a high recycling gain of about 34 when PSL was 25 W. The attached shows the time series of us moving PRM in pitch toward the negative side by about 90 urad. The first drop in the power recycling gain is caused by the power-up from 2 to 25 W. We had to move SRM by hand in order not to loose too much sideband build up in SRC. Our alignment action seems to pull the common soft (or something similar) to one direction in which all the test masses goes to negative pitch values (see the second attached). Therefore, as we were in O1, at this power level, the recycling gain can be still found under some alignment land. We did not try this test at a higher PSL power.
Also, we have noticed at some point that some segments of the POP QPDs already used up the half of the ADC range at 25 W. So we decreased the whitening gains to 0 dB (which were 6 dB before). Sheila changed the guardian accordingly so that it maintains the 0 dB gain as a nominal setting. Also when we had a good recycling gain with this alignment, the beams on both POP QPDs were almost falling off of the photodiodes
Another interesting point to note:
In a different lock stretch with a 25 W PSL, I was allso able to recover the recycling gain back to 32 or so by moving the soft offsets mostly in yaw. As reporeted above, it was surprising to me that for some reason moving PRM in pitch also regained the recycling gain.
Weigang Liu tried folding DARM and selected magnetometer channels during the three days of ER9 (UTC days) with results posted here: https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~weigang.liu/advancedLIGO_3/ER9/files/ER9_magnetometers_and_strain_list.html, where DARM folding focused on the 10-50 Hz band, and the magnetometer folding was low-pass below 50 Hz, choices motivated by O1 experience. As expected, the magnetometer channels still exhibit a variety of pathologies with 2-second periodicity, but the elevated low-frequency noise in DARM make it hard to see this 2-second contamination in that channel with this method. Attached are a few sample magnetometer fold summaries over the three days.
Quick Summary: We stay at relatively low power because ITM PI damping modules are not ready.
(All time in UTC)
23:45 SUSPI model restart
00:45 DAQ restart
1:47 Kiwamu to the floor aligning REFL camera
2:35 Kiwamu out
2:45 Kiwamu request for higher power. Going to 30W.
Today turned into an impromptu maintenance day
DAQ
Maddie, Jim, Dave:
h1fw0 work, please see previous alog. DAQ broadcaster reconfigured to add H1:SUS-ETMY_LKIN_P_LO_DQ channel to DMT for Maddie. DAQ restarted to support all of today's model changes
OMCPI Beacon Alignmnet [WP5991]
Shiela:
h1omcpi mode changed, required DAQ restart (slow chans change only).
SUS-PI DAMP quad PD data transfer to ITM-PI [WP5997]
Matt, Carl, Ross, Dave:
A new RFM channel was created on each arm to transfer the mux'ed ETM QUAD-PD I&Q phase to the corner station. The 8 channels are sent from the SUSETM-PI model via Dolphin to the PEM model. This model muxes the 8 channels to one new RFM, which is sent to the corner. The h1omc model receives the RFM channel, demuxes it to 8 channels and sends these (via Dolphin) to the h1susitmpi model. The h1susitmpi model receives 16 new channels, 8 per arm.
The following models were restarted: h1susetmxpi, h1pemex, h1susetmypi, h1pemey, h1omc, h1susitmpi. The DAQ was restarted.
h1susetm[x,y]pi has some fast channel renames:
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV1_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV1_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV2_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV2_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV3_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV3_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV4_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
+: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV4_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ added to the DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV1_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV1_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV2_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV2_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV3_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV3_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV4_DEMOD_I_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
-: fast channel H1:SUS-ETMX_PI_DOWNCONV_DOWNCONV4_DEMOD_Q_OUT_DQ removed from DAQ
which may cause some issues replaying old data.
After the addition of the RFM channel, so far we have not seen any IPC errors.
PEM changes [WP5998]
Robert, Dave:
PEMCS was changed to read three unused ADC channels into the model. Due to broken ADC channels, on the fifth ADC the last two channels (30 and 31) were upgraded to 16kHz and added to the science frame. The broken channels were removed from the frame, resulting in a nett reduction of science data.
At EX and EY additional ADC channels were ingested into pem (was ADC0 chans 8-13, now chans 8-23). At EY, four of these new channels were added to the DAQ science frame at 2kHz.
Jim, Dave:
Overnight h1fw0 has been stable while writing only science frames. Today we reconfigured it to also write second and minute trend frame files (so it is only not writing commissioning frames). It crashed on the next 10 minute point. We replaced the fiber optics cable connecting h1fw0 with the Fujitsu switch, it still crashed. Finally we power cycled h1ldasgw0 (solaris machine) and it fw0 has been stable since 12:20 PDT.
Title: 07/14/2016, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 – 16:00) All times in UTC (PT) State of H1: IFO unlocked. Relocking not successful. Need to do initial alignment. Commissioning: Outgoing Operator: None Activity Log: All Times in UTC (PT) 15:00 (08:00) Start of shift 15:23 (08:23) Bubba – Driving in desert between the arms "to look at stuff" 15:51 (08:51) Bubba – Back from drive in desert 16:00 (09:00) Robert – End-Y electronics bay 16:05 (09:05) Kyle – Going to Mid-Y and Mid-X for vacuum work 16:40 (09:40) PSL tripped – Called Peter 17:10 (10:10) Peter & Ed – In PSL to diagnose oscillator & check alignment (WP #5996) 18:06 (11:06) Dave – Restart FR0 18:07 (11:07) Dan – Going into the CER to make PEM measurements 18:30 (11:30) Filiberto & Dan – Going into the CER 19:15 (12:15) Robert & Filiberto – Out of the CER 20:00 (13:00) Robert – Going to End-Y 20:15 (13:15) Robert – Out of End-Y 21:43 (13:43) Robert – Going to End-Y 23:00 (16:00) Turn over to Nutsinee End of Shift Summary: Title: 07/14/2016, Day Shift 15:00 – 23:00 (08:00 – 16:00) All times in UTC (PT) Support: Peter, Sheila, Ed, Incoming Operator: Nutsinee Shift Detail Summary: Started locking. Problem getting past DRMI_1F. Run initial alignment. Having trouble getting through initial alignment SRC_ALIGN step. Restart initial alignment. While doing the INPUT_ALIGN step, laser tripped off. Peter reset the laser, checked and adjusted PMC alignment. Now during INPUT_ALIGN stops at LOCKING_XARM_IR. While here, the ICM will break lock and the Guardian restarts the INPUT_ALIGN. Sheila fixed the INPUT_ALIGN problem. Completed INPUT_ALIGN of the initial alignment. Commissioners working on the locking sequence.
As the pre-modecleaner warms up, the output beam pointing changes slightly as seen in the attached plots. Most of the alignment drift is in the vertical direction. Oddly enough most of the alignment tweaks for the pre-modecleaner take place in the horizontal plane.
The shot noise level from last night seems higher (worse) than the O1 level by 6%. Here is the spectrum:
You can see that the red trace (which is the one from the last night) is slightly higher than the (post-) O1 spectrum. The 6% increment was estimated by dividing the two spectra for frequencies above 1200 Hz and taking a median of it.
Evan H. suggested looking at the null and sum channels to see if the excess in shot noise is from an addition technical noise or not. The attached shows the spectrum of the null and sum channels at the same duration as the spectrum in the above entry.
From this plot, it is evident that the excess is not due to technical white noise.
I have checked the calibration of the DARM signal by comparing it against the Pcal excitation signals. I used the same lock stretch as the above entry. The height of the Pcal line at 331.9 Hz in the DARM spectrum was found be too high by 13% relative to the Pcal TR and RX PDs. See the attached. This means that we have overestimated the DARM signal at 331.9 Hz due to a calibration error. If we assume this is all due to an inaccurate optical gain, actual shot noise level should be smaller by the same factor of 13% that what we thought, corresponding to a ~7% smaller shot noise level than that in O1. We need to nail down whether this is an error in the optical gain or cavity pole in order to further evaluate the calibration error.
Note that the Pcal Y uses a fresh set of the calibration factors that was updated a month ago (27983). The ratio of RX PD over TX PD was found to be 1.002 at 331.9 Hz and this makes me think that the Pcal Y calibration is reliable.
Here I have attached plots of the optical gain during this lock as well a few locks randomly picked during the month of July. I used O1 model as reference (wasn't not quite sure whether there was new time zero reference after O1 with all kappas set to 1). The first plot showing kappa_C over a few locks during July show that kappa_C values were close to 1. However here we note that the gain in the inverse sensing function during July was set to 1.102e-6 compared to 8.834e-7 during O1 (the referene model has changed). At high frequencies, the relation between corrected h(t) and h(t) recorded in front-end is,
corrected h(t) ~ h(t) / kappa_C ~ inv_gain * DARM_ERR / kappa_C
So for same DARM_ERR, kappa_C of 1 during July 2016 corresponds to 0.8 * h(t) (= 8.834e-7 / 1.102e-6) as that of during O1. This assumes that there wasn't any change in the gain of the electronic chain on the OMC side. The second plot show trend of kappa_C during the lock Kiwamu was looking at. An interesting thing to note here that there was ~10% change in the optical gain during this lock. Kiwamu's plot correspond to time of the second peak we see in the plot (a coincidence!). The kappa_C value of 1.15 suggests that the measured h(t) in the above a-log would correspod to 0.70 ( = 8.834e-7/1.102e-6/1.15) times that of h(t) we would be measured during O1. Since the trend plot show that there were times in the same lock during which the kappa_C values were different, I tried to compare the power spectrum between those times. The third plot show that comparison. The mystery is that eventhough the ratio between the 331.9 Hz photon calibrator line and DELTAL_EXTERNAL line is ~10 % different between the times compared (and hence corresponding to ~10% different optical gain), the shot noise level looks same! We couldn't get the exact cavity pole frequencies because at this point I don't have the new LHO DARM model function, but the trend indicated that it didn't change during the lock. For completeness we also added the acutation strength variation during this time. The values are close to what we expect. Since 35.9 Hz ESD line we used during O1 wasn't available, for actuation strength comparison we used 35.3 Hz ESD line.
EDIT: We corrected the earlier estimate of high frequency h(t) level change.
Attached is the plot of the high power oscillator PZT voltage. The last voltage step coincides with when the input modecleaner and reference cavity lost lock. The first step in voltage coincides with my deliberate adjustment of the slow voltage to lock the reference cavity to a different fringe. All this was to find a place where the FSS would be relatively okay with the input modecleaner losing and acquiring lock. Apart from one or two FSS oscillations when the input modecleaner lost lock, all the PSL servos appear okay.
Changed the visibility logic for the FRONTEND and HPO maintenance fields. The front end visibility calc was formerly "A<34.9". This was changed to "A<34". Nominally the front end laser power is 35 W. The green HPO maintenance field visiblity calc was formerly "A+B+C+D>396". This was changed to "A+B+C+D>360". This means that instead of requiring maintenance for a 1% drop in power from each pump diode, maintenance is now flagged when there is 10% drop for each diode. The remaining "warning" is related to the Visual Basic program on the Beckhoff PC not running. This is only required when the spectra of the pump diodes needs to be recorded.
*track AAA: PSL
- fix FSS re-locking problem
*track A: missing RG gain:
- PR2 spot position during alignment
- Add digital camera of BS
- arm optics camera defocus & power monitor
- *** fix the 2x omega diodes for SB recycling gain readout
- check broadband mod of 2w PDs (POB and AS)
- new lens in front of POB_B
*track B: noise commissioning?
- shot noise scaling?
- check calibration
- try for 50W stable. Serious trouble with PI?
- pick operating point, then now-noise commissioning
- reduce RF45
- Aux length show exess noise - fix it!
Relevant to noise hunting: all test mass PUM coil drivers should be put in a lower noise state than state 2 (which is the noisiest state). State 4 is the lowest noise, but state 1 should be adequate as well. See 28264.
Attached are 7 day pitch, yaw, and sum trends for all active H1 optical levers.
The laser tripped this morning. The status screen red flagged the following: - Xtak chiller flow - Interlock OK - Frontend Power error (WD) - Oscillator Power error (WD) Initial thought was that a water leak occurred. That was not the case. Suspect that the power watchdog was tripped because the injection locking was lost. When the injection locking servo loses lock, the laser power drops and sets off the watchdog. The laser restarted without any problems, other than the alignment into the pre-modecleaner was off a little. Upon recovery, the pre-modecleaner had some problems locking. Went into the PSL Enclosure to adjust the alignment but by the time we got inside, the pre-modecleaner was locked. Tweaked the alignment a little. Closed the other loops successfully. After deliberately bringing up and down the input modecleaner a couple of times, the FSS seemed fine with the occasional PZT oscillation. JeffB/Ed/Peter
Before the alignment tweak the output of the locking photodiode was ... - unlocked -1.017 to -1.024 V - locked -0.148 -0.161 mV This corresponds to a visibility of ~85%. After the alignment tweak ... - unlocked -1.017 to -1.024 V - locked -0.142 mV to -0.155 mV This corresponds to a visibility of ~86%.
Measured the DC output of PDA - the first loop out of loop photodiode - with a digital multimeter (DMM). DMM reading (V) MEDM value (V) REFSIGNAL slider =============== ============== ================ -8.76 10.62 -2.15 -9.01 10.86 -2.20 -9.21 9.14 -1.85 There is a mis-match between the value reported by MEDM and that measured with a voltmeter. The level of disagreement varies over time, for reasons unknown. A known "unknown" still.
Sheila, Matt, Kiwamu, Carl, Stefan
Earlier today we tried heating TCS CO2 X-arm with 2Watt (0 Watt into Y), and all we saw was a futher drop in recycling gain.
Tonight (07:29 UTC) we tried the opposite TCS: TCS CO2 Y-arm with 1Watt (0 Watt into X). (Half of what we put into x, because we broke lock on the first try.)
Result: Absolutely nothing - all recycling gains remained the same or further dropped.
Conclusion: TCS CO2 cannot get any recycling gain back.
============================================
Log:
UTC 20160713 23:08:09 all TCS CO2 completely off
no effect on any sidebands
UTC 20160713 23:16:22 TCS CO2 X to 1 W
UTC 20160713 23:21:21 TCS CO2 X to 2 W
recycling gains drop, lock loss
UTC 20160714 07:29:00 TCS CO2 X to 2 W, TCS CO2 Y to 0 W
recycling gains drop, lock loss
This lock was brocken by ITMY bounce mode. It looks like we may need to double check all the bounce mode phases to see that they are unchanged at 40 Watts.
There were several problems with PI damping this evening, the recovery of the safe.snap after ETMY's failures today resulted in H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_PI_ULLL_SW selecting the UL quadrant rather than the LL quadrant resulting in no ETMY damping for the entire evening.
In the 50W lock an ITMY mode (purple trace -80min) reached saturation level, the resulting unstable bounce mode at lock loss may have been associated. The mode was still at elevated amplitudes at the beginning of the next lock but was damped. The damping phase needs careful monitorring a changing sign regularly. I suggest moving to QPD error signals. Finally at -15min I set H1:SUS-ETMY_BIO_L3_PI_ULLL_SW to LL and was able to damp ETMY modes again.
For the bounce mode phasing: is the DARM gain now high enough that the cloop is close to +1 at the bounce mode frequencies?
I've put together some plots of the common and differential lenses as measured by the Hartmann Sensors.
The only change I made to the Hartmann sensor data is to scale the ITMY spherical power (H1:TCS-ITMY_HWS_PROBE_SPHERICAL_POWER) by (17.5/7.5)^2. This is because the magnification has defaulted to 17.5x on HWSY instead of 7.5x which is the actual level. Additionally, I reset both HWS measurements to zero at t=0.
The first plot (LHO_diff_CO2.pdf) shows the HWSY and HWSX measurements as well as common ([X+Y]/2) and differential (Y-X) lenses along with corresponding CO2 laser powers.
The second plot (gain_vs_time.pdf) shows an approximation of the gain: the TR-X_SUM / IMC_OUTPUT. Perhaps someone can point me to a better approximation. You can see the reduction in gain powering up. The very sharp initial spikes can be ignored.
The third and fourth plots show the gain vs common and differential lenses, respectively. Remember, there is an offset in lensing in both of these plots due to resetting the HWS values to zero.
It's certainly not conclusive, but:
Nutsinee, Sheila
There is something wrong with the REFL and POP cameras, we see no image from them although we shoudl be seeing something on REFL.
Actuallythe POP camera is just misaligned (probably has been since we inserted the beamsplitter monday), but there is still nothing on refl which I think there should be.
The issue with the POP camera was found to be a clipping at the newly installed beamsplitter. This was fixed today. The REFL camera was completely misaligned for some reason, perhaps it was mistakenly moved around. The REFL camera was also realigned. So both are back to functional.
1440 -1510 hrs. local -> To and from Y-mid Opened exhaust check valve bypass valve, opened LLCV bypass valve 1/2 turn -> LN2 @ exhaust in 60 seconds -> Restored valves to as found configuration. Next CP3 overfill to be Friday, July 15th. Also, demonstrated MTP Safety Valve functionality when backed by local scroll pump (rediscovered that the "NORMOAL" light LED on the turbo controller is burned out) -> Let MTP brake phase complete but am leaving turbo rotor levitated, i.e. controller energized, overnight -> will de-energize tomorrow.
~0900 hrs. local -> De-energized Y-mid Turbo controller (Foreline 1.2 x 10-1 torr, turbo inlet 2.6 x 10-1 torr seams odd - gauges reversed?)
Nutsinee, Kiwamu,
WP5990
We have (re-) set up the polarization monitors on the HWS table by HAM4. We have confirmed that they are functional. For those who are interested in the polarization data, here are the channels to look at:
In theory, they should be in unit of watts as measured at the HWS table.
[Installation notes]
This time, we have newly installed a short pass optic (DMSP950L from Thorlabs) to pick off the main interferometer beam without getting too much contamination from either the SLED light (790 nm) or the ALS beam (532 nm). The short pass mirror was inserted between the bottom periscope mirror and the first iris (D1400252-v1). Looking at the green light at the table from the end stations, we learned that the beam size is already pretty small and (visually) small enough for the beams to fit into the PDA50Bs without a lens. So we decided to go without lenses as opposed to the previous setup (24046).
The short pass mirror reflects the interferometer beam toward the left on D1400252. We placed a PBS (CM1-PBS25-1064-HP) on the left side of the short pass and placed the PDA50Bs. The power reflectivity of the newly installedshort pass mirror was measured to be 5% +/-3% for 532 nm. The absolute power (assuming the Nova hand held power meter is accurate) of the reflected green light was measured to be 1 uW.
One thing we leaned today was that the green light is not so trustable to get the optimum alignment. We first aligned the optics with the green light and then noticed that the infrared beams were almost falling off of the PDA80Bs. So we then closed the shutters and aligned them with the actual infrared beam.
The manual gain settings are:
The digital gains were also changed accordingly so that the calibration of these channels should be accurate.
This is a first look at the polarization data with the new setup. Some analysis with the previous setting was reported by Aidan at 25442 back in this February with a focus on noise behaviors. This time, since we are looking for a cause of the degradation in the power recycling gain, we focused on the time series rather than the spectra.
We saw two behavior in the polarization data when PSL was ~ 40 W.
Based on the fact that the amount of S-pol decreases as a function of time (which should increase the power recycling gain at the same time, naively speaking), I am inclining to say that the variation in the polarization is not a cause for the smaller power recycling gain.
[An observation from last night, July 13th]
I have used a lock stretch from last evening starting at ~ 2016-07-13 1:00 UTC for 2-ish hours. The attached two plots show the measured polarization in time series.
At the beginning of the lock stretch, the input power was increased step by step up to 40-ish W. The power recycling gain hit 35 right after completing the power-up operation and then settled to a lower value of 29 or so. The power in P-pol was about a factor of 8 larger than that for the S-pol. Note that this is opposite to what Livingston observed (G1501374-v1) where the S-pol was bigger than the P-pol. Back-propagating the measured power to those at BS's AR surface (the ones propagating from ITMX to BS), we estimated the power ratio to be Pp/Ps ~ 2500. This separation ratio is better than what has been measured at Livingston (G1501374-v1) by a factor of roughly 13.
[Another observation from Jan 31st for comparison]
I also looked at a similar data set from Jan 31st of this year (25442) to see if the polarization in the past behaved in the same way or not. This data was with a 20 W PSL without the HPO activated. The behavior looked similar to what we have observed last night -- a slow decay in the S-pol and P-pol was larger than the S-pol by a factor of 6-ish. See the attached below.
Matt later pointed out that there is a possibility that my measurement set up could be unintentionally rotated with respect to interferometer's polarization plane. In this case, depending on the rotation angle, the S-pol can appear to decrease even though the actual S-pol in the interferometer increases. I did a back of envelop calculation and confirmed that the measurement setup needs a rotation of about 20 deg to get such confusion [ angle = atan(sqrt(1/8) )]. I don't think we have such a big rotation in our setup. So it seems that the S-pol really decreases at the beginning of the lock stretch.
Here are some photos of our set up.
The CW injection amptlitude, as measured at the HARDWARE_OUT, appears to have changed on restart May 12. So far, I have not been able to trace down the problem, and conlog is currently down so I cannot see a history of chagnes in the HARDWARE_OUT bank.
Figure 1 observations (10 minute trend of HARDWARE_OUT):
Figure 2 observations (10 minute trend of CW_OUT):
Need conlog to investigate further.
On Jan 20, there was a site-wide power outage (alog 25041), and after everything was restored, one of the filter modules (FM3) was not turned on, but it should have been. This was the 1/AI2 filter with design:
zpk([1.2627e3 - i*2.6133e3;1.2627e3 + i*2.6133e3],[7000;7000],1,"n")
Turning this off flips the phase of the injected signal, but it doesn't really explain the drop in the signal amplitude that I would have expected.
One thing interesting is that there was considerable high frequency noise on the PINJX_HARDWARE_OUT time series that is reduced by turning off the 1/AI2. I plotted the spectrum of the HARDWARE_OUT channel before and after, separated by 24 hours so that the pulsar injections are approximately the same amplitude. Sure enough, with the 1/AI2 filter on, there is a large peak at 7 kHz with an amplitude nearly as large as the highest frequency pulsars. Is this why the pre-power outage time series is about twice as large? It is certainly suspicious...
See attached figures for pre- and post-power-outage spectrum.