J. Kissel Your weekly charge measurement update from H1: ETMX and ETMY ESD systems are showing little-to-no effective bias voltage from accumulated charge. Recall we're flipping the bias voltage whenever the given test mass is not in use (i.e. ETMY flipped when DOWN [since 2016 Nov 28, see LHO aLOG 31929], and ETMX flipped when in nominal low noise [since 2016 Nov 03, see LHO aLOG 31172]). Since the regular flipping began, and our duty cycle has been consistently around 50%, we're keeping all quadrants below +/-10 [V] effective bias voltage, which is a small fraction of the requested bias voltage (~400 [V]), which means the actuation strength is changing at the sub-percent level, and is consistent with the uncertainty of the measurement. We should confirm this by comparing against longitudinal actuation strength, a. la. LHO aLOG 24241.
WP 6428
This morning the CO2 Laser Interlock Chassis D1200745 was replaced. This work is part of the ongoing investigation of the TCS flow sensor alarms/glitches. See alog 32776. Verified trip point for the temperature shutoff of the laser on new chassis. Steps taken to replace chassis:
1. Turn off laser at key
2. Turn off chiller in mechanical room
3. Turn off chassis and unplug all connections
4. Install new chassis, rocker switch set to CW (OPS) position
5. Redo connections to chassis & power on
6. Turn on chiller
7. Check there are no red lights on chassis front panel
8. Key on laser and press gate button
9. Check laser power actually powers on (MEDM screen).
Old Chassis S1302125
New Chassis S1302122
Fil, Richard, Nutsinee, Alastair
This swap unfortunately didn't seem to fix the problem. TCSY flowrate continues to glitch.
FAMIS#4709
I couldnt get the data via the script so I had to get second trends "by hand" in dataviewer. Barbaric.
ETMY Pit is at -12
ETMY Yaw is at -8
ETMX Pit is approaching -10
Krishna
I have modified the C# code in BRS Beckhoff computers used for the angle readout. The code is used to fit the cross-correlation of the patterns in the CCD to infer the position change (=angle) of the patterns. The code used to have a manually adjusted fit parameter. This was unsatisfactory and produced errors in the fit as the beam-balance position changed over time or it's amplitude grew. The noise level in the angle would vary from ~0.2 nrad/rt(Hz) to ~0.4 nrad/rt(Hz). We came up with a better routine than can extract this parameter from the data and use it to correct the fit producing superior results as shown in the attachment. The noise level should now stay below 0.2 nrad/rt(Hz).
The code for both BRS' has been updated.
This should allow us to set higher thresholds for BRSX damper, which will help with the problem in 33028. However, it would still be a good idea for the operator or anyone else to keep the BRSX amplitude small by damping it, whenever we are not observing.
Other updates
I cleared the encoder_value_save.txt file for BRSX, by deleting all characters inside. I suspect the large number of ascii values there were caused by interruption of the ethercat communication to the Beckhoff Motor Controller, likely due to lose wires. The evidence for this is the two drops in the BRSX_BOXBIT in November. It hasn't happened since, but it would be good to investigate it when convenient. After clearing the file, I restarted the computer, restarted the PLC and zeroed the encoder position. After modifying the C# code and restarting it, the damper seemed fine. We'll keep an eye on this.
For BRSY, I noticed a couple of problems with the Diagnostic C# code, which we use when we have to change the centering of the beam-balance. First was that Visual Studio asked me to log in with a Microsoft account id. I created a new one, since I couldn't remember what the old one was. This info will be added to the BRS troubleshooting guide on the DCC to prevent this problem in the future. Second, the C# code would freeze after 11 seconds for no obvious reason. I restarted the Beckhoff computer, after which it worked fine. I wanted to make a note of this here to prevent future surprises.
After consulting with John W. and Bubba G., Jim W. and I decided to postpone the spare seismometer test at BRSY due to the poor road conditions. I'll leave the table with Jim and he will install it at the next available opportunity
I've attached ASDs showing that the tilt-subtraction works as before, after the code changes. Wind speeds have been between 5-15 mph during this period.
WP 6418 After moving minute trend files from h1tw1's SSD RAID, I modified the daqdrc file and restarted daqd on h1nds1 to read the old minute trends from /frames.
The alignment into the reference cavity was tweaked. Transmission signal went from ~1.6 to ~3.5. Mostly pitch adjustment on the periscope.
6.4M Kirakira, Solomon Islands
Was it reported by Terramon, USGS, SEISMON? Yes, Yes, No
Magnitude (according to Terramon, USGS, SEISMON): 6.4, 6.4, NA
Location: 108km WNW of Kirakira, Solomon Islands; LAT: -10.2, LON: 161.1
Starting time of event (ie. when BLRMS started to increase on DMT on the wall): ~15:50 UTC
Lock status? Caused lockloss.
EQ reported by Terramon BEFORE it actually arrived? It arrived before my shift started, so not sure.
TITLE: 01/10 Day Shift: 16:00-00:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Earthquake
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jim
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 11mph Gusts, 9mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.39 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.38 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY: Currently Down due to EQ in Solomon Islands that arrived just as shift was starting.
TITLE: 01/10 Owl Shift: 08:00-16:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: EQ, maintenance day
INCOMING OPERATOR: Nutsinee?
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 11mph Gusts, 10mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.24 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.41 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
I had problems with PI modes 27 & 28 all night, they needed constant attention. 27 broke lock once, and when I got back up, looking at spectra showed that the modes that were ringing up were outside the mode 27 bandpass filter, so I switched from FM5 (18036.5 hz) to FM4(18040 hz), and could at least control the PI for the rest of the night, but it needed frequent tweaks to the PLL phase.
Maintenance has started, Peter headed out to the PSL after an EQ knocked us out, Krishna has started a software upgrade to the BRSs.
TITLE: 01/10 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
Took ISI CONFIG to BIG_EARTHQUAKE_NOBRSXY after the lockloss & stayed there for about 30min (6:40-7:12utc) per text from Warner.
Now just holding at LOCKING_ARMS_GREEN until noticeable seismic motion (seen via ALSx/y & Tidal traces) decays, also per text from Warner (who is inbound shortly).
Seismic band (0.03-0.1Hz) has dropped down to 0.5um/s now.
LHO DQ summary:
Fire alarm follow-up:
For more details, please see the DQ shift pages: 2017Jan02, 2017Jan05
H1 has been in OBSERVING for over 6.5hrs. Range is a hovering around 60Mpc.
Minimal activity. Gerardo just arrived to make a cable for an IP5 in Mechanical Room.
Just had a TCSy Chiller Flow Alarm.
On Kissel's suggestion, flagging H1 data from 23:45-1:25UTC, due to snow plowing (by Bubba). This is for CP2 access for LN2 delivery Tues morning. Activity could be seen in our 3-10 & 10-30Hz bands. This brought H1 range down below 50Mpc at times during this period. Drifts were several feet high & it took him almost 2hrs just to plow just this short section.
H1:DCH-SNOW_PLOW:1 added!
TITLE: 01/10 Eve Shift: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
J. Kissel I've noticed the amplitude spectral density of PCALY RX PD looks to be showing the same sort of clipping behavior that was present early last October (Identified in LHO aLOG 30827; Solved in LHO aLOG 30877). I'll send a note to team PCAL and suggest they take a look tomorrow during maintenance. The attached plot shows the ASD of PCALY RX PD (in PURPLE) and CAL-DELTAL_EXTERNAL (in RED) during the most recent lock stretch (2017-01-09 19:30:49 UTC) compared against PCALY RX PD right after they'd fixed the clipping issue last time (2016-10-26 17:26:40 UTC). Unclear why the clipping has returned, other than to say that what is a "good" alignment of ETMY that the exit PCAL beams were aligned to may have changed / drifted over time. A 20 day trend shows that clipping only started after the IFO returned to operation on Jan 4th.
I made a comparison between TxPD and RxPD at calibartion line frequencies beginning Dec 1 until yesterday. TxPD has not changed over time but RxPD changed after the break.
This morning we sat in nominal low noise without going to observing from 19:21 to 19:51 UTC (Jan 9th) in a configuration that should be much better for the 1084Hz glitches. (WP6420)
On Friday we noticed that the 1084Hz feature is due to OMC length fluctuations, and that the glitch problem started on Oct 11th when the dither line amplitude was decreased (alog 30380 ). This morning I noticed that the digital gain change described in alog 30380 that was intended to compensate for the reduced dither amplitude didn't make it into any guardian, so that we have had a UGF that was a factor of 8 lower than what I used when projecting OMC length noise to DARM: 30510 The first attachment shows open loop gain measurements from the 3 configurations: before oct 11th (high dither amplitude), after october 11th (lower dither amplitude, uncompensated) and the test configuration (lower dither amplitude, compensated).
We ran with the servo gain set to 24 (to give us the nominal 6Hz ugf) and the lowered dither line amplitude from 19:21 UTC to 19:51 UTC Jan 9th. You can see the spectrum durring this stretch in the second attached screenshot, in the test configuration the peak around 1083Hz is gone, with just the pcal line visible, and the OMC length dither at 4100Hz is reduced by more than an order of magnitude. You can also compare the glitches from this lock stretch with one from yesterday to see that the glitches at 1084 Hz seem to be gone. This is probably the configuration we would like to run with for now, but we may try one more test with increased dither line amplitude.
Other notes because we don't have an operator today due to weather:
This morning all 4 test mass ISIs were tripped probably from the Earthquake last night that brought the EQ BLRMS to 10 um/second around midnight UTC. ITMY tripped again while it was re-isolating, no problem on the second try.
Richard topped added 400mL to the TCSY chiller around 10:15 or 10:30 local time, since we were getting low flow alarms. The flow alarms came back a few minutes before 11am local time.
I went through inital alingment witout problems and got to DC_readout transition. Then I measured the UGF of the OMC length loop in preparation for increasing the dither line height From that measurement and trends it became clear that when the OMC dither amplitude was reduced, the compensation of the OMC digital gain described in didn't make it into the guardian. This means we have been operating with a UGF in the OMC length loop that was a factor of 8 too low since mid october.
We arrived in low noise at 19:21 UTC with the OMC ugf increased to 6Hz. After about a half hour PI modes 27 and 28 rang up, and I wasn't fast enough to get them under control so we lost lock.
Here's a graphical version of what Sheila wrote, showing the time on Oct 11 when the 1083 Hz glitches started. The dither amplitude was reduced at 3:20 UTC, but the servo gain was increased to compensate. There are no 1083 Hz glitches at this time. Severe RF45 noise starts an hour later and lasts until the end of the lock. The 1083 Hz glitches are evident from the beginning of the next lock, and persist in every lock until the recent fix. The dither amplitude stayed low in the second lock, but the servo gain was reset back to its low value. Apparently, both need to be low to produce the glitches.
Keita tells me that people are concerned about making this change because of the increased noise below 25 Hz in the screenshot attached to the original post. We did not run the A2L decoupling durring this lock strech, and it was not well tuned. The shape of the HARD loop cut off at 25Hz is visible in the spectrum, which is one way of identifying bad ASC noise. The high coherence between CHARD P and DARM at this time is another way of seeing that this is angular noise (attachment).
So I think that this is unrelated to the OMC gain change and not really a problem.
1080Hz removal OMC gain/line conditions, does it make more low frequency noise?
Josh, Andy, TJ, Beverly
Conclusion: For two on/off times each for the two OMC gain tests (total 8 times) it looks like the high gain / low line configuration that takes away 1080 Hz (and also takes away some bumps around 6280Hz) coincides with a bit more noise below 25Hz.
Request: We hope this connection with noise below 25Hz is chance (It might have just been drift and we chose times unluckily) and we would like debunk/confirm it. We could do that with a couple cycles of on/off, (e.g. 5 minutes each, with the current configuration vs high gain / low dither configuration).
See the attached PDF. The pages are:
Also: There is no coherence above 10Hz between STRAIN and OMC LSC SERVO/I for any of these test times. So coupling must be non-linear.
Also: When the 1080Hz bumps disappear we also see a bump around 6280Hz disappear (attached image, sorry no x-axis label but its 6280Hz)
Our post crossed with Sheila's. If possible, we'd still like to see a quick on/off test with the A2L tuned. Could we have five minutes with the gain high and then ramp it down? Maybe with one repeat. Since this is a non-linear effect, we'd like to make sure there's no funny coupling with the CHARD noise. We're not too worried by excess noise below 25 Hz now, but it might be important when we're able to push lower.
While LLO was down I attempted to do a test by increasing the OMC length gain while in lock, which unlocked the IFO. So on/off tests aren't possible. Edit: I broke the lock by changing the gain after the integrator (which had been OK when not on DC readout), we can change the gain upstream instead without unlocking.
For now I put the new gain into the guardian so the next lock will be with the increased gain, and hopefully see that the low frequency noise is fine.
Now we have relocked, Patrick ran a2l, and Jeff, Evan, Krishna and I did an on off test by ramping H1:OMC-LSC_I_GAIN:
The attached screen shot using the same color scheme as in the presentation above shows that there is not a difference at low frequency between high gain and low gain.
We are back in observing in the low gain configuration, but the gain is set in an unusual way (and accepted in SDF so that we can go to obsevering). Keita would like us to hear confirmation from detchar before making this permanent.
Thank you Sheila, this looks really good. No change at low frequency. 1080Hz gone. The 6280Hz just varies on its own timescale. From our end we're happy with the configuration change since it only does good. Sorry for the red herring about low frequencies.
Replaced IP5 controller in mech. room with GAMMA LPC (+) controller (WP 6421). One of two channels of the old controller was faulting "over temperature," a typical error/failure mode on the Varian controllers. LVEA pressures rose slightly due to reduced pumping speed (see aLOG 33070) over weekend. We will update CDS signal cabling (right now pump appears to be in error, but it is actually fully functioning) and reboot Beckhoff at next opportune maintenance period.
Installed new cable for IP5, after removing old cables/connectors for previous version of controller.
Note: New controller is using the connection to pump A of old system, same calibration as other similar GAMMA (LPC +) controllers.