Displaying reports 55881-55900 of 86279.Go to page Start 2791 2792 2793 2794 2795 2796 2797 2798 2799 End
Reports until 01:26, Sunday 06 November 2016
H1 ISC
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:26, Sunday 06 November 2016 - last comment - 06:07, Sunday 06 November 2016(31246)
improved 35 W spectrum

Our noise at 35W is now similar to the noise at 25Watts, and the extra power might be giving us some range. 

ILS gain helped:

The first screenshot shows that the ILS gain has a more dramatic impact at 35 Watts than at 25W (31223).  If it is possible to boost the gain in this servo more at frequencies below 1kHz, this will help our noise at 35W and higher.  

IMC WFS offsets

The second screenshot shows a comparison of several spectra, the main point is to show that we can power up to 35W without making the accoustic peaks worse (and with some of them actually better), with the combination of more ILS gain and IMC WFS offsets.  I started with the offsets that Jenne used last night 31221  I think that for PIT, nothing in DOF2 is fine, and I think that 400 in DOF1 is a little better.  For yaw, I didn't see much impact from offsets in DOF1 oe 2, but there might have been a small improvement using positive offsets (I ended up at 0.55, but could have gone further).  I moving IM3 P (away from its rail) to mimic the move that the IMC WFS made on IM4 trans, but this had no impact on the IMC PZT jitter coupling to DARM.  

The third screenshot shows comparisons of spectra and coherences before and after the IMC WFS moves.  The low frequency improvemenmt in DARM is just from running a2l.   The IMC shift increased both the intensity noise and the frequency noise, suggesting that what we are doing with these offsets is creating intensity noise in just the right way that it cancels some other noise, like frequency noise, in DARM.  You can see that the coherence with the ILS is reduced by the IMC WFS move.  In the 4th screenshot you can see that the move decreases the coherence of REFL control with DARM, but at the 260Hz Refl control becomes coherent with the intensity noise. We have convinced ourselves that both frequency noise (31176) and intensity noise (31186) are well below DARM, but we might need to think a bit harder about that. 

For anyone who is curious to look at this data: the after the IMC move time was 6/11/2016 03:21:00 UTC, you can get 30 averages at 0.1Hz BW without seeing noise from Robert's injection which is visible in DARM in the 4th screenshot, the before time is 01:34:47, and you can take 100 averages at that time. 

IMC WFS oscillation:

The IMC WFS have been osciallting at the microseism, I think this was contributing to the difficulty transitioning to POP X WFS.  I turned the overall gain of the IMC WFS down from 0.1 to 0.04, you can see the impact in the 5th attached screenshot.  This gain is before the offsets we have been adjusting, so the DOF1P offset which was originally 400 should now be 160 with the new gain ect.

Other things done today:

I asked TJ to get another lock in this configuration if he can, then do the ring heater change I promised Stefan I would do.  

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 06:07, Sunday 06 November 2016 (31250)

I only had one short lock to play with the WFS here is what I tried:

10:39 - Turned On DOF_1_P OFFSET at 160. This made a good, visible difference in the 200-300hz area and gained ~3Mpc on range, but the ISS diffracted power started to decrease and oscillate.

10:53 - Turned On DOF_3_Y OFFSET at 0.6. Couldn't see any immediate differences, and the diff pwr was getting VERY low at this point.

10:58 - Changed from 0.6 to 0.3. This made things a bit worse. Diff pwr still degrading.

11:00 - Changed from 0.3 to 0.75. Seemed better from 100-400hz, peak at 350 may have slightly increased.

11:02 - Lockloss, not sure if it was from this change or just the dying diff pwr.

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Sunday 06 November 2016 (31242)
OPS Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 11/06 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Acquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY:  Locked at NLN for the first 4.5 hours of my shift. After lockloss, have been unable to make it back to NLN, mostly due to ISS issues. 
LOG:

Robert to LVEA a couple of times.

3:26 Lockloss.  Cause unknown.

5:11 Sheila plugging DBB back in.  Robert unplugged it earlier.

H1 PSL
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:25, Saturday 05 November 2016 - last comment - 18:10, Tuesday 16 March 2021(31245)
ISS second loop offsets, DBB, PSL rack grounding problems?

Travis, Sheila

Tonight we saw more pathological behavoir in the PSL electronics.

Robert wanted to do a test of powering down the DBB, so he switched the power supply that sits on top of the DBB chassis off and unplaggued the DIN connector from the back.  After this, engaging the ISS second loop caused the diffracted power to drop from almost 5% to less than 0.5%, which caused locklosses as we tried to increase power. 

We tried to let the offset adjustment servo (30932) run for a while, but this didn't help. 

We plugged back in the DBB so we could get back to locking, but doing so tripped the PSL external shutter. 

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 01:48, Sunday 06 November 2016 (31248)

We've continued having trouble with the ISS second loop introducing a large offset into the ISS, although it is not as bad with the DBB plugged back in. 

The attached screenshot shows the AC coupled ISS second loop moving the diffracted power by almost 2% as we power up, so we need to be able to keep the diffracted power high enough that we don't saturated while powering up.  Right now turning on the second loop decreases the diffracted power by about 4%, so we are just setting it high to start with.

Images attached to this comment
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - 08:17, Sunday 06 November 2016 (31252)

In addition to electronics problems, there is also a chance that there might be alignment differences in the beam path next to the DBB when it is shut off since it is 4 degrees warmer than the table.

daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 12:57, Sunday 06 November 2016 (31262)

How to adjust the diffraction power (when out of lock):

  • Make sure the second loop is in its down state. This means only the input switch is off. The output switch is on as well as its input into the first loop board.
  • Make sure the excitation input is enabled and the AC coupling servo switch is on (shouldn't do anything, since the input switch is off).
  • In this state, the output offset should be continuously zeroed by the offset servo. Just check that the second loop output readback reads near zero.
  • Adjust the REFSIGNAL of the first ISS loop, so that you roughly have 4% diffracted power.
  • Turn second loop on with the input switch (the IMC needs to be locked).
  • In the AC Coupling medm screen there is an input offset (top left). Adjust it so that the diffracted power stays at 4%.
  • Toggle the input switch and make sure that the diffracted power doesn't change.
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 18:06, Monday 28 November 2016 (31942)IOO, OpsInfo
 How to adjust the diffraction power (when out of lock) -- translated with screenshots of the relevant MEDM screens, and with the language color coded to match the colored highlighted boxes on the screenshots:

   - Make sure the second loop is in its down state. This means only the input switch is off. The output switch is on as well as its input into the first loop board.
   - Make sure the excitation input is enabled and the AC coupling servo switches are on (shouldn't do anything, since the input switch is off).
   - In this state, the output offset should be continuously zeroed by the offset servo. Just check that the second loop output readback reads near zero.
   - Adjust the REFSIGNAL of the first ISS loop, so that you roughly have 4% diffracted power.
   - Turn second loop on with the input switch (the IMC needs to be locked).
   - In the AC Coupling medm screen there is an input offset (top left). Adjust it so that the diffracted power stays at 4%.
   - Toggle the input switch and make sure that the diffracted power doesn't change.
Images attached to this comment
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 18:10, Tuesday 16 March 2021 (58265)

These instructions are outdated.  The ISS second loop board has been modified since these were written.  Please see new instructions at alog 58264.

H1 AOS
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:30, Saturday 05 November 2016 - last comment - 13:41, Sunday 06 November 2016(31243)
More CP movements

I don't think I had focussed the input arm cameras yet when Sheila made this log about moving CPs, https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=30979, so I offset CPY to see if I could see where the light was hitting. I could see a moving spot on an apparent table weight in front of the PR2 scraper baffle (screenshots show nominal and pitch of -150 on CPY, bright spot is at the very bottom of nominal image). However, I could not see it on the "swiss chese" baffle in front of HAM2 when I looked through a viewport, so it is likely dumped on the vacuum enclosure near HAM3 or the "eye" baffle between HAM3 and the long IMC tube, and from there reflects onto HAM3. Sheila's 0.1 Hz excitations did not show that this was a current problem. Nevertheless, from looking at the camera, I agree with her that a lower-scatter parking place is at CPY pitch < -70. This might also give us even more head room for some of the ~100 Hz scattering associated with vibration excitation of the input arm vacuum enclosure.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
robert.schofield@LIGO.ORG - 13:41, Sunday 06 November 2016 (31265)

The reason I dont think it is a simple path off of PR3 is that the spot is quite large and diffuse.

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:22, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31244)
Ops Eve Mid-shift Summary

Locked at NLN since before my shift started.  Lost lock at ~3:30UTC for unknown reason.  Sheila did a bit of IMC work during the downtime.  Seems to be relocking nicely at the moment.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:14, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31239)
Ops Day Shift Summary

TITLE: 11/05 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 68.2743Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Travis
SHIFT SUMMARY:

H1 locked most of the shift and getting back to NLN wasn't too tough (other than a Beam Diverter issue, which is noted below).

LOG:

NOTE:  Bubba would like a rough idea of # of people here between now and tomorrow. (we had 2-3 people most of the day)

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:27, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31240)
Mid Shift Status
H1 PSL
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:25, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31238)
Weekly PSL Chiller Reservoir Top-Off

While turning off unneeded lights for the weekend, I checked the PSL chillers.  I went ahead and topped off the crystal chiller with 175mL since it was around 1/4 full between min & max.

H1 DetChar
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:18, Saturday 05 November 2016 - last comment - 10:13, Saturday 05 November 2016(31232)
H1 Summary Page Hasn't Updated For Last ~22hrs

Before driving in this morning, I checked the H1 Summary Page.  This page has been down for almost a day (L1's Summary Page appears to be fine).  

Comments related to this report
david.shoemaker@LIGO.ORG - 09:28, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31233)CDS
Duncan M and Joe A are on it; ldas admins at LHO need to give it a kick.
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 09:42, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31234)OpsInfo

Thanks, David---Just heard back from Duncan.  A few things for me & for all operators (tagging this alog with OpsInfo) with regards to Service Issues With Summary Pages:

duncan.macleod@LIGO.ORG - 09:56, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31235)

I have posted a note to myself to update the 'Report an issue' URL to point to https://git.ligo.org/detchar/ligo-summary-pages/. If in doubt, an email to detchar@ligo.org is best, to cast a wide net.

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:13, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31237)

I'd suggest posting the detchar group email, too. Or atleast tag these pages with detchar in some way, because my old memory only knows these pages as the "Summary Pages" & I don't see any mention of Detchar on the pages...well, I guess I do see it in the web address name.  Just want an easy/quicker way to address this in the future. 

Perhaps we can add "check the Summary Pages" as an item in our Operator Shift Check Sheet?

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:07, Saturday 05 November 2016 - last comment - 10:08, Saturday 05 November 2016(31231)
Ops Day Shift Transition

TITLE: 11/05 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 68.4202Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
    Wind: 7mph Gusts, 3mph 5min avg
    Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
    Secondary useism: 0.67 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:

TJ handed over a nicely locked & steady H1 (flat and only 1 visible glitch on the range); been Undisturbed for last ~7.5hrs (the Observatory Mode was set to Locked, but I set it to Observing.)

Other Notes:

Robert is here and would like to do PEM Injections with a locked H1.

Bubba is on-site to search for possible leak in the water system.

H1 Summary Page down (making separate alog).

useism is high (~0.6um/s).  But our handy SEI CONFIG says we are good at the WINDY state (until we get up to 1.0um/s).  Staying put.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 10:08, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31236)

Whoops did not mean to comment here...and I don't know how to delete comments.  :-/

LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:09, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31230)
Ops Owl Shift Summary

TITLE: 11/05 Owl Shift: 07:00-15:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Aquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: Lost lock as I sat down, the ITMY swinging happened to me as well. Misaligning and aligning didn't seem to help, but it eventually damped on its own. Then went up to Coil Drivers before it lost it again, but brought it back to NLN and it has been sitting there since with the intent bit Observing. I was planning on doing some tasks for commissioners but couldn't connect to the oscope, and I didnt want to go into the LVEA to disturb the lock. I will try these tomorrow.

LOG:


 

H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:38, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31229)
IFO locked in Low Noise and Observing, for now...

Up and observing for a bit while it looks like livingston is about to be up, then I'll drop the intent bit to do some tasks from commissioners.

H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:24, Friday 04 November 2016 - last comment - 01:02, Saturday 05 November 2016(31226)
ASC moving everywhere at the micoseism

We noticed that the sidebands buildups started to oscillate at the microseism once we switched to low-noise (lower ASC bandwidth ?). We suspect something with ITMY or its suspension is mistuned, because it would hardly damp after4 lock-loss. Not sure whether it is related.

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 01:02, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31228)
About the ASC moving at microseism frequencies: Last night I saw that switching from pop x wfs to refl for PR3 control made the build ups unstable at the microseism type of frequencies, switching this back and keeping the rest of the low noise ASC changes kept things more stable. The refl wfs have a large oscillation that was mitigated a bit by increasing the centering loops bandwidths. This afternoon Jenne and I noticed that the IMC wfs have the same oscillation, so they might be the source of the problem. This oscillation shows up in the refl wfs even when the ground is very quiet, so it must be self inflicted.
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:14, Friday 04 November 2016 - last comment - 16:55, Saturday 05 November 2016(31218)
Should we turn off the ITM ring heaters?

As Sheila pointed out, back in May we had a 25W lock that lasted >5h and never showed any indication of jitter peaks.

The attached plot 1 shows spectra from May 17 (25W), July 16 (40W) and Nov 3 (25W). Note that the May 17 spectrum is taken 4h into the lock.

Plot 2 shows inputy power and range of the May 17 lock.

Plot 3 shows all TCS settings of the May lock.

Plot 4 shows all TCS settings currently used.

 

Based on this, I would like to turn off the ITM ring heaters.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 16:55, Saturday 05 November 2016 (31241)

Yes, we should probably try this, and we will set them soon. 

In the attached screenshot the red traces are from the short lock right before we turned on the ITM ring heaters on June 28th, the black traces are from a longer lock July 1st, and we do have worse noise at a few hundred Hz. 

At this time we had the same ETM ring heater settings as now (1.5Watts on each), CO2X was at 0.4 Watts (we currently are at 0.2 but Kiwamu thinks it should be increased), and CO2Y was at 0.3W.  

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 55881-55900 of 86279.Go to page Start 2791 2792 2793 2794 2795 2796 2797 2798 2799 End