Displaying reports 55881-55900 of 78094.Go to page Start 2791 2792 2793 2794 2795 2796 2797 2798 2799 End
Reports until 09:27, Sunday 25 October 2015
H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:27, Sunday 25 October 2015 - last comment - 10:16, Sunday 25 October 2015(22811)
Ops Day Transition: IFO 2nd harmonic of violin modes is preventing Low Noise, Sheila and Elli on their way in

Ops Day Shift - 15:00-23:00UTC, 8:00-12:00PT, all times listed are UTC

H1: cannot get back to Low noise due to violin second harmonics around 1008Hz

Current Plans:

- Elli on her way in to do her measurement - takes about 30 minutes and she needs an unlocke IFO

- Sheila on her way in - she had me comment out the line that engages ETMY L2 MODE3 in the ISC Guardian, but suspects that that won't be enough to get back to Low Noise, so is driving in

Changes:

- ETMY L2 MODE3 in the ISC Guardian commented out, and I left a comment in the file that I did this today

Current state of ground motion:

- useism coming up again and upper data points are touching 1 on the seismic plot

- also some anthropogenic noise starting about one hour ago

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 09:32, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22812)

The ROLL modes are quite bad, and I believe prevent IFO from getting to ENGAGE ASC

- Only time IFO has made it ENGAGE ASC this morning was when I turned on ROLL mode damping early

daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - 10:16, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22813)

It should be possible to construct two narrow filters to damp the violin modes - each perhaps 20mHz wide, centered on the line you want to damp. Filters this narrow should be able to damp one line without ringing up the other. From there it's just a matter of finding the right phase. Don't be too timid with the gain - i think using 30% of the DAC range is perfectly safe, once you are confident your settings won't ring anything else up. The higher harmonics need lots of gain.

In the past these modes have damped very easily. The settings have been stable for months - I wonder what changed?

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:20, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22804)
OWL Ops Summary

TITLE:  10/25 OWL Shift:  07:00-15:00UTC (00:00-08:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

STATE of H1:  ETMy violin mode issues.  H1 currently down.

Incoming Operator:  Cheryl

Support:  Kiwamu (drove onto site)

Quick Summary:  ETMy violin mode (2nd harmonic) has been ringing up over last 2 days.

Shift Activities:

Handing off H1 to Cheryl.  H1 should be able to get up to Engage ASC3 or DC Read out and then one can continue work on damping ETMy violin.  Cheryl will contact Sheila when she gets a chance.  She has experience working on damping these modes, but will give Sheila a call this morning.

Notable changes:

anti whitening (FM1) OFF for OMC DCPDs (A&B)....as Kiwamu notes.

ETMy MODE3 currently at gain of 50 (100 is what used to be nominal, but this rings up ETMy).

LHO General (PEM, SUS)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:46, Sunday 25 October 2015 - last comment - 06:33, Sunday 25 October 2015(22808)
Mid Shift Summary: Violin Mode Work

State:  Out of Observation Mode and at DC_READOUT for Violin Mode work.

As noted earlier, we had rung up violin modes.  Kiwamu is now on site.  We are pausing Guardian so we can address the ETMy 2nd order violin mode.  (was not sure what to mark this as with Observatory Mode....used Preventative Maintenance at first, but then switched to Corrective Maintenance.   We will stay here until we are able to bring down these huge violin modes.

Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 06:33, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22810)ISC

No success so far.

It seems that there are two modes close to each other separated by roughly 46 mHz according to the beatnote I see in the damping signal.

Having +120 deg with a gain of -4500 allowed us to damp one of them while the other rung up. The nominal gain setting seems to bring us to some kind of equilibrium state where the two modes neither ring up nor down, perhaps it is very slowly ringing up.

The 1st stage of the OMC whitening is currently OFF in order to prevent the DCPD from saturation. This must be ON when we turn into observation.

H1 SUS (OpsInfo)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:05, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22807)
Violin Mode Rung Up for ETMy(!), Out of Observation to Address, Kiwamu On Way To Site

Note:  at the beginning I trended a channel which was red in the ODC Overview (H1:0MC-DCPD_A_INMON) & over the last day, these dcpds have been noticeably getting big during the last two locks (starting at 10/24 11:00 utc).  See attached plot for these PDs getting rung up (presumeably due to the ETMy violin).

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 AOS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:49, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22806)
OMC DCPD Saturation?!

At 9:25, started getting OMC DCPD Saturation alarms.  Not sure what to do here.  Can only see issue on the ODC overview & I'm getting Verbal alarms every few minutes.  The range is also taking a dive.

I don't have the rf45 template up because nuc5 had issues.  And I don't know where to find the dtt session for it.  So not sure if the issue is related to that.

LHO OpsInfo
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:19, Sunday 25 October 2015 - last comment - 05:13, Sunday 25 October 2015(22805)
NUC5 Rebooted, Recovery Not Trivial

The DMT Viewer sessions (for seismic trends) on NUC5 had been closing out the last few days.  The NUC5 instructions say this is probably due to memory loss, so rebooted the computer by clicking the button on the nuc computer.  

Unfortunately, I didn't obviously see the computer come up on the TVs.   Luckily Jim was here and tinkered with the TVs and saw that the TV switched to a different input source.  So, had to switch it to HDMI (also had to switch the upper TV, which required a ladder).  

I couldn't log in to the computer, so I had to pull a keyboard and mouse from another computer & logged in.  (after this I could share the screen remotely).

I opened up the seismic DMT sessions.  I wasn't sure how to open the rf45 session (Cheryl posted the link to that file...but do I need to ssh into a different session to run this?).

Final note:  I could not get the mouse onto the bottom TV screen.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 05:13, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22809)

After a few hours noticed odd display on the low frequency seismic changes.  Then I looked at the date for this session and it was for some time in August!  Not sure why this was the case.  I just hit RUN.  Closed the session out and hit RUN again, and this time it was live with today's date.

Now can see that over the last 12hrs the useism has been trending up noticealby.

H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:22, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22803)
Transition to OWL Shift Update

TITLE:  10/25 OWL Shift:  07:00-15:00UTC (00:00-08:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

STATE of H1:  H1 In Observing @ 79 Mpc

Outgoing Operator:  Jim

Support:  On Call-->Kiwamu until 7am & then Sheila from 7am - 4pm

Quick Summary:  H1 running nicely with a high range hovering at 80Mpc (due to low useism?).  Jim mentioned a peak on the running DARM spectra which looked new (and not seen on our 10/14 reference).  This peak is ~16.75Hz  (What is this?).

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:22, Sunday 25 October 2015 - last comment - 01:11, Sunday 25 October 2015(22801)
Shift Summary

TITLE:  23:00-7:00UTC

STATE of H1:  Locked in Observation Mode @ 77Mpc

Support: I ran into Kiwamu in the kitchen? Miquel was here.

Quick Summary:  lost lock half way through, relocking was kind of slow

Shift Activities:

 

3:10 Lock loss, I was making food at the time, but I suspect RF45?

3:45 DRMI and PRMI are no good, start initial alignment

4:15 Initial alignment done

5:00 relocked, A2L run, it leaves some diffs in OMC that I revert, which brings up a change in LSC ARM input matrix. Not sure what it does, but the IFO is running so I accept it.

 

RF45 has been slightly noisy tonight, seems to coincide with ETMY saturations. I couldn't find the directions on how to deal with it, someone threw away the sticky on the ops workstation, and it seems the directions haven't made it into the ops wiki.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 01:11, Sunday 25 October 2015 (22802)

Please see the new Operator Sticky Note wiki page.   (this is where we look for latest/greatest news for operators running H1.  Here rf45 instructions are posted from Stefan's alog from 9/30).

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:18, Saturday 24 October 2015 (22800)
Mid Shift Summary

Lost lock at about 3:00 UTC, and was struggling a little to get it back. IFO is relocked now, I'm running A2L before resuming observing, should be just a couple more minutes.

H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:54, Saturday 24 October 2015 (22799)
Ops Day Summary

TITLE:  15:00-23:00UTC, 8:00-12:00PT, all times in UTC

STATE of H1:  Locked in Observation Mode @ 77Mpc

Incoming Operator:  Jim

Support:  Jordan Palamos (fellow)

Quick Summary:  H1 locked entire shift

Shift Activities:

 

Glitches in the range:

 

17:36:19UTC - ETMY saturation, glitch in range, 17:38:00UTC

 

18:38:00UTC - glitch in range, not announced as ETMY

 

18:55:00UTC - glitch in range, not announced as ETMY

 

18:04:01UTC - ETMY saturation, glitch in range, 18:06:00UTC

 

19:03:20UTC - ETMY saturation, glitch in range, 19:05:00UTC

 

19:28:19UTC - ETMY saturation, glitch in range, 19:30:00UTC

 

20:35:16UTC - ETMY saturation, glitch in range, 20:37:00UTC

 

21:04:00UTC - glitch in range, not announced as ETMY

 

22:00:56UTC - ETMY saturation, glitch in range - NONE

 

22:21:00UTC - glitch in range, not announced as ETMY

 

Quiet shift with no earthquake activity, and only one burst of wind around 18:50UTC that got up to 20mph.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The 45 MHz FOM is userapps/isc/h1/scripts/H1_45MHz_Demod_FOM.xml

 

The six-panel seismic FOM screen is /ligo/home/controls/FOMs/Seismic_FOM.xml

 

 

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:18, Saturday 24 October 2015 (22794)
OWL Ops Summary

TITLE:  10/24 OWL Shift:  07:00-15:00UTC (00:00-08:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

STATE of H1:  Locked in Observation Mode @ 76Mpc

Incoming Operator:  Cheryl

Support:  Kiwamu (on-call, and on phone for 1.5-2hrs)

Quick Summary:  H1 back with 90mHz Blends for BSC-ISIs & ASC Soft filters OFF---> Since useism has been trending down over the last 24hrs (it's currently about 0.18um/s).

Shift Activities:

H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 05:15, Saturday 24 October 2015 - last comment - 05:59, Saturday 24 October 2015(22793)
Mid-Shift Update: Initial Alignment & Issues, Locking, NLN, Observing....FINALLY!

(Corey, Kiwamu)

After no obvious headway, Jim and I both were thinking another Initial Alignment was looking inevitable.  After he left around 1am, I went about starting an Initial Alignment. 

During the alignment, while in ALS, I noticed one of the control signals not converging (ETMX M0 LOCK Y OUT 16).  Is this normal?  I went ahead and offloaded Green WFS.

Problems locking the Xarm for Input Align

Then when starting Input Align, the Xarm simply would not lock.  Would get fringes which would give powers up to 1.0, but they were less than a second.  The Mode Cleaner would drop out every few minutes as well.  When there were fringes in the Xarm, one could see the ASAIR spot shift in yaw a little.  These were the symptoms.  I waited for about 20min.  Then I woke up Kiwamu at about 1:45am PST.

PR2 Tweaked In Yaw

Since the IMC kept dropping, we addressed input pointing by tweaking PR2 in yaw.  I moved 1.0 units (from 4313.6 to 4312.6)

Dark Offsets

Kiwamu suspected bad dark offsets, so we pitched MC2 to prevent IMC locking, and then ran the dark offset script (/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/asc/common/scripts/setQPDoffsets)

After running this the offsets were not zero (more like 4!).  Found offsets in the SUM filter banks (which are at sitemap/LSC/Photodetectors overview/X_TR_ {A & B} /SUM {full}.  We took these to zero & were now happy with offsets.

At this point, I went to get water while Kiwamu watched X-arm locking.

LSC XARM Gain

We tried to give Xarm a kick by enabling the ETMX M0 LOCK L OFFSET (& also disabled the BOOST [FM4]), but this didn't have much of an effect....

While I was getting water, Kiwamu changed a gain for XARM (located at sitemap/LSC/Overview/XARM).  The gain is usually at 0.05 during INPUT_ALIGN, but Kiwamu took it to 0.1 & this finally locked XARM.  So to get the XARM to lock one doubles the gain, waits for it to lock up, and then drops it back down (i.e. to 0.05).  

At this point we decided I should start over with the alignment, and that Kiwamu would go back to sleep...I think we were on the phone for about 1-1.5hrs.


Back to Initial Alignment & Locking

Ran through an Initial Alignment with no noticeable issues.  (Dark Mich took a while to settle down; that seemed new to me, and Jim noticed this, too when I saw him aligning).

Finally went for locking.  Had issues at various points.  For ALS, there were VCO/PDH Errors popping up on Guardian.  Going to the Yarm VCO showed errors on that screen (ALS_CUST_LOWNOISEVCO.adl).  So, from Sheila's Training powerpoint file, I saw that I should take the Tune Ofs slider to zero, and that took care of that.

ASC Soft FM1 -20dB filters:  OFF!

Since useism has been trending down over the last 12 hrs, and since the BSC-ISI blends are back to the 90mHz ones, I opted to let Guardian Turn OFF the ASC SOFT filters.  This is different from previous lock segments!

Made it to NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE!

After over 4.5hrs H1 was finally back to NLN!  SDF had a few Diffs, so I went through them:

O1 CDS Overview RED TIMING ERROR

Before going to Observation Mode, I noticed SUSETMY had a TIMING RED box.  Clicked "Diag Reset" to clear.

Went to Observation Mode at 11:32UTC

[Time for lunch]

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 05:59, Saturday 24 October 2015 (22795)

I forgot to run the A2L measurement!!  :-/

H1 General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:57, Saturday 24 October 2015 - last comment - 01:11, Saturday 24 October 2015(22791)
Transition to OWL Shift Update

TITLE:  10/24 OWL Shift:  07:00-15:00UTC (00:00-08:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

STATE of H1:  Jim Aligning

Outgoing Operator:  Jim

Support:  On Call-->Kiwamu

Quick Summary:   Arrived to see Jim starting an alignment.  Started attempting to lock.  For DRMI, we had a quick wrong-mode-lock, but could not get powers up, so we tried PRMI, but it this never locked up.  After head scratching, we are figuring out:  To Align (again), Or Not To Align.  I'm trying to lock one more time with this alignment again.  If there is no luck here, I might try another initial alignment.  Stay Tuned.

Comments related to this report
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 01:11, Saturday 24 October 2015 (22792)

OK, PRMI only locked once in 10min.  I'm going to try Initial Alignment #2 shortly.

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:21, Saturday 24 October 2015 (22790)
Shift Summary

Title: 10/24 EVE Shift 23:00-7:00 UTC

State of H1: Relocking

Shift Summary:  Locked in Observing Mode for most of the shift, lost lock shortly before Corey arrived

Activity log:

23:06 Lock loss

00:30 Switch back to 90mhz blends, useism and winds are both quiet

1:00 Lock is reacquired

6:37 lock loss, no clear cause, winds are quite, useism still going down, none of the other foms show anything obviously suspicious, I start a new initial alignment because ALS comm beatnote has been trending down (was 2 db at the beginning of the 1:00 lock stretch, was 1db now, with ALS X being difficult to hold)

H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:52, Friday 16 October 2015 - last comment - 21:49, Friday 23 October 2015(22593)
A2L beam spot positions (so far)

We're still having operators run A2L before going to Observe or when leaving Observe (e.g. for maintenence), so there's more data to come, but I wanted to post what we do have, so that we can compare with LLO's aLog 21712

The 2 plots are the same data:  The first uses the same axis limits as the LLO plot, while the second is zoomed in by a factor of 5.

It certainly looks like we aren't moving nearly as much as LLO is. 

Note that the values for both LLO and LHO are missing a coupling factor of L2P->L3L, which will change the absolute value of the spot position displacements.  However, since we're both wrong by the same factor, our plots are still comparable.  See aLog 22096 (the final comment in the linked thread) for details on the factor that we still need to include.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 21:49, Friday 23 October 2015 (22789)ISC

Today I went through all of the A2L data that has been collected so far, and pulled out for analysis all of the runs for each optic that had acceptable data.  Here, I'm defining "acceptable" as data sets that had reasonable linear fits, as displayed in the auto-generated figures. 

In particular, for almost all of the ETMY data sets, there is one data point that is very, very far from the others, with large error bars.  I'm not sure yet why we seem to have so much trouble collecting data for ETMY.  I've emailed Marie at LLO to see if they have similar symptoms.

For all of the times that we have taken measurements, I also checked whether the IFO had been on for more than 30 minutes or not.  In both plots below, the cold blue data points are times when the IFO had been at Nominal Low Noise for less than 30 minutes prior to the measurement, while the hot pink data points are times when the IFO had been at Nominal Low Noise for at least 30 minutes.

The first plot is all of the data points that I accepted, plotted versus time.  This is perhaps somewhat confusing, but each of the y-axes are centered about the mean spot position for that optic and degree of freedom, plus or minus 3 mm.  So, each y-axis has a range of 6mm, although they're all centered around different values.

For the second plot, I find all the times that I have both acceptable pitch and yaw measurements, and plot the spots on a grid representing the face of the optic.  Note that since I had zero acceptable ETMY Yaw data points, nothing is plotted for ETMY at all. 

Interestingly, the ITM spots seem fairly consistent, regardless of how long the interferometer has been on, while the ETMX spots have a pretty clear trend of moving as the IFO heats up.  None of our spots are moving more than +- 1.5 mm or so, so we are quite consistent.

Images attached to this comment
Displaying reports 55881-55900 of 78094.Go to page Start 2791 2792 2793 2794 2795 2796 2797 2798 2799 End