Yesterday, all the ISI and HEPIs were deisolated to check the fluid system Accumulators' gas charge. All HEPI and ISI DC positions are held by the Isolation loops except for the BSC's ISIs. I reviewed these platforms' cartesian positions and the ETMYs RX tilt has the largest shift at 3urads, ITMX RX delta is 1.5urads. Some positions change by a couple ums: ETMY X shifted 2um, ITMX X shifted 1um. All other shifts are a few hundred nm or nrads or less with most being less than 100nanounits.
I don't think the SEI is contributing to alignment difficulties.
I got suspicious about PMC length locking offset and changed H1:PSL-PMC_INOFFSET.
Increasing it by 1.7mV decreased the PMC length feedback by about a factor of 2, and 1st loop out of loop sensor by a factor of 4 or so, which doesn't make sense. In the attached, red and green are with nominal 3.1mV offset, blue and brown are with 4.8mV.
(After this measurement I noticed that Daniel increased the length gain from 16 to 28dB and forgot to bring it back. This measurement is with 28dB locking gain, but it still doesn't make sense.)
What's the nominal signal level for PMC demod? Is it tiny? When is the last time the PMC demod phase was optimized?
More strange stuff, when we look at the PDA and PDB photodetectors of the first loop in the ISS. In the attached plot, the current traces are with a PMC offset of 3.28mV, reference traces 1-15 are with a 3.58mV offset and reference traces 16-19 are with a 2.98mV offset. With a positive offset change we see a some degradation in PDA at high frequencies, whereas PDB sees significantly less noise. For a negative offset PDA gets a tad bit better and PDB gets worse. Overall PDB shows up to an order of magnitude change in its noise level, whereas PDA only shows up to a factor of 2, going the opposite way. The PMC gain was high and 28dB.
Here is the throughput as function of the offset with a Lorentzian as a fit. The parameters are 0.761, 3.28mV and 4.59mV for the amplitude, offset and HWHM, respectively. Looks like the demodulated signal is only ~9mV pk-pk.
(Keita writing as Sheila)
For those of you who are interested, Daniel's measurement doesn't mean that the noise behavior (in length locking and in intensity noise) makes sense.
(Now writing as myself.)
According to T0900577 (select ilspmc_servo3.pdf) the output of TUF-3 mixer is amplified by a DC gain of 4 and sent to a summation amplifier that has a gain of 10 for the demod and a gain of 1/100 for the offset.
The offset signal seems to be calibrated to represent the offset in the OUTPUT of the summation amplifier (i.e. +-100mV when the offset from DAC is +-10V). Update: I was deceived by HOPR and LOPR of he signal on MEDM being 100 and -100, but the calibration filter of this channel of this gain is just 3.2k, so the number should represent the equivalent offset after the gain of 4 but before the gain of 10.
So this 9mVpp is after the gain of 40 total, the demod right after the mixer should be ~9mV/4/10=230uVpp.
Update: The demod right after the mixer should be ~9mV/4=2.3mVpp.
If this is true this is excessively small and cannot be good, and I wonder if the demod phase is correct or if this is an expected signal level. If this is as designed, can't we increase the modulation depth upstream or something?
(The main document in the above DCC is so-called PDF Portfolio, which is just a document containing all pdfs listed in "other files". If you're on Linux workstations the pdf in the above DCC appears as if it's just a one-page document promoting Adobe product, but if you're using evince document viewer, change "thumbnails" on the left panel to "attachments", and you can select whichever file in the portfolio to view).
Looking at the RF chain:
Therefore, the drive to the modulator seems to be -10 dBm, or 71 mV rms. A standard New Focus 4004 EOM has a modulation coefficient of 25 mrad/V. So the estimated modulation depth is around 1 mrad.
The mixer readbacks are flawed and just see ADC noise. They could use a gain of 200 to get above the ADC noise. Proposed values:
Ops Shift Log: 10/26/2016, Owl Shift 07:00 – 15:00 (00:00 - 08:00) Time - UTC (PT) State of H1: IFO is unlocked. Working on relocking after the maintenance window Intent Bit: Commissioning Wind: Is ranging from Calm to Light Breeze (0-7mph) 0.03 – 0.1Hz: Currently at 0.07um/s – Ringing down from EQ 0.1 – 0.3Hz: Trending lower – Currently at 0.8um/s Outgoing Operator: TJ Incoming Operator: Travis Activity Log: Time - UTC (PT) 07:00 (00:00) Take over from TJ 07:45 (00:45) Adjust Dust Monitor alarm levels 12:18 (05:18) Put IFO into DOWN, due to alignment and locking troubles 13:30 (06:30) End Shift early. Shift Details: Support: Sheila Shift Summary: IFO unlocked. After a difficult but successful Initial Alignment by the Evening shift, working on relocking. After a long night (very long for Sheila) of many tweaks were able to get the IFO to lock at DC_READOUT once for about 30 minutes. After this lock broke we were unable to get past green locking. There are problems with INPUT_ALIGN hanging at LOCKING_XARM_IR, (see aLOG #30881). Sheila did not think there was much chance of successful locking. I put the IFO into DOWN to await the refreshed minds and fingers of the day shift to continue the good works of the past two shifts.
Sheila & Jeff B. Over the past few shifts the ALS green power build up in the X arm has steadfastly remained below 0.95 despite all tuning efforts. The Y arm build up as been normal. We trended the X Arm DC power. On the 24th the power of the green laser dropped from 1.02 to 0.95, (trend posted below).
[Travis, Jenne]
We tried chasing alignments a little bit, but also can't get the transmitted power above 0.95ish. Travis suggested looking at the laser itself. In the attached screenshot you can see that the green DC power measured at the end station dropped suddenly, at a time corresponding to the drop in transmitted power. Why would the power drop like that? Were there things going on at the end station around the 24th?
After making a minor modification to a pair of mirror mount supports, a pair of Picomotor equipped mounts
were installed on the PSL table. These mounts steer the beam into the pre-modecleaner, the controls for
which are accessible from the ISC Picomotor MEDM screen. Picomotor A (aka #1) is the one furthest from the
pre-modecleaner and closest to the high power oscillator, B (aka #2) the one closest to the pre-modecleaner.
Yaw controls are X, pitch Y.
The modification made to the base was to avoid crushing the flat cables that come from the Picomotors.
Work performed under work permit #6268.
Rick/Jason/Peter
This afternoon Kiwamu and I plugged the DBB back in. When we did this, the PSL external shutter closed; Peter King said that it is a know issue that shutters close randomly when you power things on or off in those racks.
I also took put a 1/100 divider on the BNC connector from the 18V rack power, AC coupled it with a 560 and plugged it into LSC_EXTRA_AI_1. The plan is once we are locking to try another test of the DBB shutters, and see if it still has an impact on our nosie with the TCS and alingment changes from last weekend.
We have had trouble with alingment since maintence day today. There were several things that happened that could potentially impact alingment: SUS models were restarted, HEPI work, and adding picomotors to the PSL before the PMC. The PSL work is probably the most likely culprit. I hope that we will be more selective about what we choose to do on maintence day from now on.
Alingment symptoms:
The PMC alingment is not as good as it had been. There were also shifts in the alingments of MC1+3, especially in yaw. Were these from model reboots or did someone intentiaonally change them to relock the mode cleaner? The spot on IM4 trans move from 0.2 in yaw to -0.35 or so. TJ and I trended all the IM osems and they hadn't moved much, but we restored the small changes. Once Jeff B and I finally got the IFO locked (I engaged the soft loops one at a time by hand), our recycling gain was very low (below 24). I tried to move MC1+3 in yaw to restore the position on IM4, both earlier with TJ and with the full IFO locked, the MC WFS generally drag it back to where it was. With the full IFO locked I moved IM3 in yaw, which did help the recycling gain (I chose IM3 because it's after teh Faraday, not because I think it is what moved). I moved it too fast and broke the interferometer lock, so we finished using it to restore the position on IM4 Trans with just the mode cleaner locked. We partially reverted this because we saw no flashes in the arm, and are going to give up for the night now.
If we still have this problem in the morning, it is probably worth taking a look at the irises that Cheryl placed on the PSL table a while ago to see if the beam goes into the IMC with the same alignment.
REFL WFS don't work for PR2 at 2 Watts:
I changed the ISC_LOCK guardian back to using POPX WFS for acquisition. The point of the POPX WFS is that they can be used even when inital alingment isn't great and the recycling gain is low, so we would like to keep them on for power up and switch to REFL WFS in LOWNOISE_ASC. I've put some code in low noise ASC to switch back, but we haven't gotten to test this yet. I guess that the matrix to use REFL to control PR2 was probably tested at 25 Watts last night but set up in the guardian for use at 2 Watts, because Jeff B couldn't engage the REFL WFS yesterday morning after commisioners left. Tonight it was clearly breaking the lock, which might have been partly because of our bad alingment, but when we changed it back to POPX it was fine.
Initial Alignment changes:
Jeff B and I just made a few changes to initial alingment, after TJ, Evan, and I had difficulty with input align earlier in the night. Although our alingment change today probably contributed to this, I think the changes are good and things I've been meaning to do for a while anyway.
Betsy, Jason, Travis, Kiwamu,
After some investigation and tentative adjustments, the situation did not improve after all. We still have no idea what happened.
In the end, we restored all the suspensions back to where they were before the maintenance and steered the IM3 yaw to obtain a value of +0.2 in IM4_TRANS_YAW.
[Some conclusions]
[Summary of the activities]
[Summary of the shift]
The following tables summarize the alignment before the alignment and after our investigation and adjustments.
Summary table for pitch
|
before [urad] around Oct/24/2016 20:50 UTC |
after [urad] around Oct/26/2016 21:20 UTC |
change [urad] after - before |
|
| MC1 witness sensor | +44 | +40 | -4 |
| MC2 witness sensor | +503 | +501 | -2 |
| MC3 witness sensor | -915 | -912 | +3 |
| IM1 witness sensor | +186 | +186 | 0 |
| IM2 witness sensor | +608 | +607 | -1 |
| IM3 witness sensor | + 1956 | +1932 | -24 |
| IM4 witness sensor | -3860 | -3863 | -3 |
Summary table for yaw
|
before [urad] around Oct/24/2016 20:50 UTC |
after [urad] around Oct/26/2016 21:20 UTC |
change [urad] after - before |
|
| MC1 witness sensor | -1037 | -1050 | -13 |
| MC2 witness sensor | -676 | -676 | 0 |
| MC3 witness sensor | -1011 | -996 | +15 |
| IM1 witness sensor | +1117 | +1117 | 0 |
| IM2 witness sensor | -209 | -208 | +1 |
| IM3 witness sensor | -37 | +145 | +182 |
| IM4 witness sensor | -533 | -558 | -25 |
As I was writing these values, I noticed that the the beam waist location of the IMC translated by roughly 0.5 mm according to equation (4) in P1000135. I have no idea how we ended up introducing this translation in the IMC eigen axis without changing the input beam line determined by the PSL periscope mirror and the MC2 spot position. As expected, we compensated whatever the misalignment by introducing a +182 urad offset to IM2. If this compensation by IM3 is not perfect (and probably this is true in reality), this will result in a different spot position on PRM. The rest of the interferometer should be fine in principle.
Jenne, Sheila, Kiwamu,
In addition, we did a brief test in order to distinguish whether this is due to a change in the PLS pointing or something in the suspensions.
We conclude that misalignment in PSL (if any) don't explain what we see on IM4_TRANS. Again, we still don't have an idea of what happened.
[The test]
We restored all the suspensions back to the values listed above. We disabled the IMC ASCs so that they don't pull the suspensions to whatever the points they want to park. The idea is that with the restored suspension, we should get back to the same value on IM4_TRANS if all the misalignment was due to something in the PSL. If the spot on IM4_TRANS does not come back to the old location, then something in the chamber must have changed.
[Results]
Initially, the yaw signal of IM4_TRANS was about -0.4 counts before we restored the suspensions. After the restoration, the value became -0.1 which is closer to what it was (+0.2). However, obviously we did not fully come back to the old value on IM4_TRANS. This means that misalignment in PSL alone can not explain the situation right now. Something else likely in the chamber must have moved.
This result motivated us not to touch the PSL. Instead we decided to move IMs to recover a high recycling gain in the interferometer (30910).
Reset the dust monitor alarm levels back to correct values after maintenance window.
For some reason the ETMX bio settings are frequently being set to something inoperable. I think this is the third time I've seen these settings in the last week or two. (It happened on sunday after the CDS problems, and I think maybe last tuesday). The ESD should be set to high volts, enabled.
Open FRS Ticket 6527. I'll look at this as soon as I can. Apologies for leaving before full recovery to be able to catch and address this.
TITLE: 10/26 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jeff
SHIFT SUMMARY: Slow recovery from a big maintenance day. There were ISS struggles in the beginning, then ALS was pointed to nowhere, followed by many hours trying to figure out why the IMC was not locking. While Sheila and I had seemed to have tried everything, the MC just suddenly locked by itself. The FSS PZT Mon may have been oscillating for a while which could have caused much of the issue, but we are not 100% sure that this was the only problem for that time. Initial alignment also had PRM and SRM waaaaaay off, which meant adjusting other optics after adjusting those as well. Just finished an initial alignment and starting up the chain before I hand it off to Jeff.
LOG:
DarkhanT, Yuki Inoue (KAGRA), RickS (SudarshanK assisting with image analysis over the phone - until the phone died).
Today, we went to Yend to investigate the apparent clipping that EvanG had discovered (see entry 30827).
We found that both beams were off centered on the aperture of the Rx module integrating sphere, with the Outer (lower) beam clipping on the aperture (see attached image). Blocking one beam and then the other revealed that the increased noise in the Rx power sensor spectrum was all due to the clipping of the Outer beam.
Camera images revealed that the beams had moved on the ETM as well (exonerating movement of the ETM as the cause of the movement on the Rx side).
Analyzing Pcal camera images we found the beam position offsets from the optimal locations were (x, y): Upper (-1.5, 1.8); Lower (-6.9, -2.5) (millimeters) Usual x,y convention: positive x, right; positive y, up.
Not knowing what had moved, we used the output steering mirrors in the Tx module to center the beams on the Rx intetrating sphere aperture (see attached photo).
After moving the beams, analysis of camera images (see attached) gave the following beam locations (x, y): Upper (-1.4, -0.9); Lower (-1.3, -1.4) (millimeters).
These are within our 2 mm tolerance.
We installed apertures at the output of the Tx module and at the input (just upstream of the steering mirrors) in the Rx module.
We will repeat the Yend calibration using the Working Standard as soon as possible.
Spectra look much better too! Attached are times from before Oct 11 maintenance work (blue), just after Oct 18 maintenance work (green), and this morning after the clipping had been fixed (red). Note that the amplitude of the 331.9 Hz has returned to the O1 amplitude. A trend of the mean power level over the last 10 days is also attached. The calibration discrepancy between TX and RX PD is likely now reduced. Previously, as identified by Shivaraj (LHO aLOG 30845), the discrepancy was ~4%. Now the discrepancy is less than ~1% as the end of the trend indicates.
| Work Permit | Date | Description | alog/status |
| 6280.html | 2016-10-25 16:29 | DAQ NDS has bug which reports many errors to the log file when it encounters the new MD5 files. Fix is to remove this reporting from the nds process (note, not the daqd process). | 30875 |
| 6279.html | 2016-10-25 09:19 | Perform timing-related measurements at end stations. Output of the CW injection will be disabled for a short while. | 30854 |
| 6278.html | 2016-10-25 08:51 | Investigate apparent clipping of Pcal beam, first trying to determine which beam is clipping. Adjust alignment to relieve clipping. Re-calibrate if adjustment of alignment is required. | 30827 |
| 6277.html | 2016-10-25 08:31 | Perform scheduled maintenance to scroll compressor #3, #4, #5 @ X-End vent/purge-air supply skid. Maintenance activity will require for the compressors to run for brief periods of time. Lock-out/tag-out power to skid. | 30853 |
| 6276.html | 2016-10-25 08:07 | Increase the light on ISS PDA (first loop) [Change the neutral density filter to a less dense number?] | 30871 |
| 6275.html | 2016-10-25 07:31 | Update NDS2 client software to version 0.13.0 for Ubuntu 12 and Ubuntu 14 workstations. | 30843, 30859 |
| 6274.html | 2016-10-24 15:05 | Remove view port covers in input optics area, output optics area and end stations. Plastic sheet will be available if not already present. LVEA/VEA will be laser hazard. | 30867 |
| 6273.html | 2016-10-24 14:36 | Add whitening filter to PMC HVMon channel. | 30846, 30859 |
| 6272.html | 2016-10-24 12:42 | Experiment with frame write priority/scheduling settings to help address re-transmit issues. We will reconfigure h1fw2 and if the changes do not cause regressions may move the configuration to h1fw0 & h1fw1. | 30859 |
| 6271.html | 2016-10-24 11:12 | E1600292 was approved and will be applied to the VCO in the corner station. This will remove 420kHz noise from the VCO +/- 24V rails. | 30869 |
| 6270.html | 2016-10-24 10:55 | Remove and replace UPS batteries for Y-END, X-END, Y-MID, X-MID, and Corner Station vacuum racks. | 30823 |
| 6269.html | 2016-10-24 10:22 | Start and run QDP80 pumps (minimum of 30 minutes as routine PM) * Energize Main Turbo Pump controllers and note indicated pressures on either side of fore line isolation valve (aka "Safety Vale") * with header side of Safety Valve at minimum pressure, dump accumulated gas withing turbo pump into fore line via briefly opening Safety Valve * Record pressures in turbos afterwards as "t0" for long term rate-of-rise measurement | 30873 |
| 6268.html | 2016-10-24 10:12 | Install picomotors into the mounts for mirrors M06 and M07. This will allow remote tweaking of the beam alignment into the PSL PMC. The PSL will remain up, although we will close the external shutter when actually installing the motors. The beam alignment into the PMC will need to be re-done after the installation. | 30798, 30801 |
| 6267.html | 2016-10-24 10:04 | Check/recharge AR HEPI Fluid Accumulators: All SEI platforms down, Fluid Pump Stations Off, check pressure in Accumulators, recharge as needed. Return system to operation. 2ish hours. | 30850 |
| 6266.html | 2016-10-24 09:50 | Install gutter on the north side of the OSB Building. | |
| 6265.html | 2016-10-24 06:41 | Perform quarterly lubrication of all Axivane Supply Fans on site. | |
| 6264.html | 2016-10-21 15:16 | Expand H1EDCU_DAQ.ini to include the new DAQ diagnostics EPICS channels. DAQ restart required. | 30859 |
| 6263.html | 2016-10-21 13:52 | Removal of ISI-WIT projections of GS13s into supension point, as is now covered by SEI models (E1600028). Also revamp of SUS channel storage in the frames (E1600316). | 30728, 30821, 30844, 30859 |
| 6262.html | 2016-10-21 13:34 | Pull/Extend picomotor controller cable (DB25) cable from ISCT1 into PSL. Cable will then be connected to picomotor breakout box D1101738 inside PSL. | 30726 |
| 6261.html | 2016-10-21 09:24 | Do a noise measurement on the PSL HV power supply in the CER mezzanine. | 30781, 30725 |
| 6260.html | 2016-10-19 14:07 | Turn off Proxmox server to install more memory (Proxmox is a virtual host that holds: Matlab license server, autoburt and H0epics) those server will shutdown as well during the installation time. | 30859 |
| 6259.html | 2016-10-19 13:41 | Improve diagnostics: better error check for ALS end stations when locked with red; enable device info. | 30842 |
| Previous Work Permits | |||
| 6247.html | 2016-10-17 08:57 | Pull power and network cable for RGA in corner station. Work will consist of climbing over HAM4 and pulling around BSC2 and BSC3. | 30635, 30799 |
Keith found the source of our full disk. When md5 checksums where added to the frame directory the NDS server began logging error messages for each non .gwf file that was found. This ended up contributing to huge log files +90GB.
We have updated the nds process to quiet these messages as this is no longer an error condition.
See work permit 6280 and bug 1054.
Cyropump #4 was generating alarms today, both before and after Dewar fill. After trending signals, it appears the LLCV and exhaust noise has been growing over time. Pump fill level and LLCV setting stabilized after I opened the bypass exhaust valve. Wondering if the check valve is faulty. Will test tomorrow. I have removed and reinstalled it a couple times in the last month with TC testing.
Kyle, Chandra We ran all QDP80 roughing pumps on site today for maintenance and for refresher (WP 6269); checked for gross leaks in foreline/turbo volumes. Found one at MX. EY as found pressure foreline = 14 Torr turbo = 0.58 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = 0.040 Torr turbo = 0.036 Torr MY as found pressure foreline = 2.3 Torr turbo = 0.60 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = 0.013 Torr turbo = 0.022 Torr LVEA - vertex as found pressure foreline = 2.2 Torr turbo = 0.67 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = 0.017 Torr turbo = 0.022 Torr LVEA - Xbeam manifold as found pressure foreline = 12 Torr turbo = 0.63 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = 0.021 Torr turbo = 0.039 Torr LVEA - diagonal as found pressure foreline = 5.4 Torr turbo = 0.54 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = 0.026 Torr turbo = 0.039 Torr LVEA - Ybeam manifold as found pressure foreline = 5.4 Torr turbo = 0.48 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = 0.025 Torr turbo = 0.034 Torr MX as found pressure foreline = 780 Torr turbo = 1.0 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = leaking turbo = 0.084 Torr EX as found pressure foreline = 6.6 Torr turbo = 0.43 Torr after rough pump down and following valve isolation foreline = 0.017 Torr turbo = 0.026 Torr The leak in the X-mid fore line is between the Turbo Header isolation valve and the Turbo fore line Safety Valve. Removed and examined the NW seals but nothing obvious. We verified each QDP80 shuts down with the absence of N2 purge seal gas supply except the Y-end QDP80 which did not shut down. Y-mid pump turned off due to overheating because cooling water was not valved in initially. It leaked a small puddle of coolant and ran OK upon cooling. We pumped down the purge air line in LVEA unintentionally.
FRS 4559
WP 6247
EX:
1. Placed HWS camera on seperate power supply. The power supply is underneath the ISCTEX table.
2. Finished cabling for RGA at EX.
LVEA:
1. Placed HWS cameras (X & Y) on seperate power supplies.
2. Terminated network cable for RGA in LVEA. Network cable is pulled to SUS-R3. Connection to switch needs to be made in CER.
2. Placed power distribution boxes (24V regulated down to 12V) for the ITM spool cameras, for both X and Y arms.
2. Placed junction box and landed power cables on top of H1:SUS-R5. This is part of the ongoing work for the 24V digital power distribution.
3. Started work on junction box on top of H1:SUS-R6.
The software for the HWS cameras needs to be restarted.
F. Clara, E. Merilh
[Changed the power level on PDA]
I went into the PSL today and changed the ND filter that was screwed on the PDA photodetector module (30415) in order to change the power level of the photo diode. Before the change the PDA DC singal read a relatively small value of 2.2 V. After the change, the DC signal became 3.8 V which is close to what PDB says 3.9 V. Indeed, the voltage readouts for the two diodes shown in the medm became close to each other (~ 4.5V). The new ND filter is actually a stuck of 0.2 and 0.5 abrorptice ND filters. It was an ND1 before.
[New setting for ISS inner loop]
The gain slider now should be 18 dB (which used to be 30 dB, 30415). This gain gives us a UGF of 54 kHz. This means that the open loop transfer function is almost identical to the one with PDB used as the in-loop sensor (29942) as expected. In fact, we can now switch the sensor between PDA and PDB without changing the reference offset or gain while keeping the loop closed. Though this typically changes the diffraction power by a few %. The new gain is now accepted in SDF.
The attached is a plot of the measured open loop transfer function with PDA. Also the raw data is attached. Also, I attach a noise spectrum seen at one of the analog output for measuring the transfer function.
M. Pirello, A. Ramiez, E Castrellon
Work Permit 6271
Per ECR E1600292 we applied the VCO capacitor mod to all 5 VCO's in the corner station and one at each end station. This process includes replacing the 10nF capacitors on C79 and C80 with 2uF capacitors, and checking the voltage rails to verify elimination of the 420kHz oscillations.
Corner Station Units:
S1200563, S1200559, S1200560, S1200564, S1200558
End X:
S1200561
End Y:
S1200566
Notes:
End X, there was a very inconvient clean room pole directly in the path of extraction for the VCO from the rack. We had to relocate 2 chassis to angle the VCO enough for removal. All chassis were put back in their original positions before leaving.
End Y, this VCO required more capacitance to remove all of the 420kHz noise on the -24V Rail, with the addition of a 2nd 2uF capacitor, the noise was eliminated.
After going through my notes, the following should also be logged.
VCO S1200563 is outfitted with a PLL board. This board is attached to the existing board via an SMA-T connector on the Low Noise VCO Board. This connector was very loose when we opened up the chassis, and the end that is supposed to connect to the PLL board was disconnected and wedged between two VCO modules. The SMA was very loose here. We showed Richard this and he advised us to remove the SMA-T and the SMA jumper cable which was disconnected, we then used an SMA cable torque wrench to ensure proper torque on the connectors.
When we worked on the 2nd PLL VCO chassis (S1200564), we noticed that the SMA-T was torqued, and the SMA jumper was attached to the PLL board.
We recorded AI output of PCAL injection as well as PCAL_DAC_FILT thing together with witness GPS 1pps using Tektronics MSO4043 (1 sec with 1Msample per channel, and 2 sec with 1Msample per channel).
We also recorded the digital output of the PCAL injection as well as digital input of the PCAL_DAC_FILT thing.
Evan will look at the timing comparator data.
These will be analyzed in the near future for further timing sanity check.
Data is stored at /ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER10/H1/Measurements/timing. Analysis forthcoming...
Analysis complete. See LHO aLOG 30965.
Since the noise of the detector has improved around the 331.9 Hz Pcal injection frequency, we can reduce the amplitude of the injection (current setting 9000 cts for both sine and cosine). I have reverted changes that increased the amplitude of this line (see LHO aLOG 30476). The new amplitude setting is 2900 (for both sine and cosine amplitudes), which is the same as it was before increasing the injection amplitude. This also brings the total injections to Pcal Y below the threshold (see LHO aLOG 30802). The threshold is 44,000 counts. The current total injection is now 38650.0 counts. Screenshot of excitation settings attached.
Note to self: check the front-end calculations of the uncertainty and coherence of these lines before and after this change after the IFO reverted back to 25 [W] input power. Example checks: - do the calculations show the expected decrease in coherence / increase in uncertainty? - how much was the uncertainty / coherence when the SNR was so high? - do we like that level of uncertainty? did it reveal more real optical parameter changes instead of noise?
Delayed update, these changes were accepted in the SDF today (Oct. 26, 2016, ~10:20 PDT).