Sheila reported that Nutsinee switched the SEI_CONFs to BLEND_45mHz_SC_useism last night but looking this morning I see that it did not switch the Blend on ETMY. I manually switched the (X & Y dof) Blends only; the Sensor Correction did switch to not use the BRS. Otherwise all switching worked with Sensor Correction for all Test Masses and no BRS in use at the Ends.
State of H1: aligned and locking, has made it to NLN but lost lock, ALS Y arm fiber polarization shot up to 28%, now adjusted back down
Activities:
H1 Observations:
It appears that the new channels in the h(t) frames contain some NaN or inf values that the DQ program refused to process. This cause the low-latency data to hang. In order to repair this I had to set an environment variable and restart the process managers on h1dmt0 and h1dmt2. Hopefully everything will run smoothly from here out.
Attached are the results of the BSC and HAM spectra as requested by FAMIS 6871. I didn't see anything glaring, but I also don't know what I'm looking at.
Generally these all look fine with regard to the intention of this test. There are no outlying base levels in the higher frequency (above the 'details' < 20 Hz) range.
here is the timeline of yesterday evening's h1oaf0 DAC problem which required a restart of the IOP model
All times are local PST.
Prior to the problem, h1iopoaf0 STATE_WORD is 512 (OVERFLOW)
| delta-T | time | event |
| 0:00 | 19:23:00 | IOP DAC drives go to zero volts. h1iopoaf0 STATE_WORD=652(ADC,DAC,DACKILL,OVERFLOW) |
| +5:00 | 19:28 | phone conversation, decision to restart IOP models |
| +11:00 | 19:33 | models restarted after killing them, DAC drive is restored. Presumably killing model h1susprocpi caused lock loss |
Jeff,
This monitor has been regularly sounding. Below are the PSL dust monitors in their current configurations. There were no incursions today. No fans or environmental controls were changed and winds are below 10 mph.
J. Oberling, E. Merilh
The PSL tripped out this morning due to the commissioning work detailed here. The cause is the ILS losing lock, which then triggered the HPO power watchdog and shut off the HPO; the 35W FE and the chillers remained operational. The system recovered without issue and is now back up and running. I took the opportunity to reset the injection locking counter in both Beckhoff and the Laser MEDM screen, and tweaked up the beam alignment into the PMC (hooray for remote control!) to recover the PMC transmitted power we had yesterday (alignment drift due to temperature changes in the PSL enclosure with the environmental controls on and off).
Keita Daniel
Yesterday, a large oscillation around 1 MHz was observed on the DC readout of the PMC locking diode. The DC readout is tapped directly at the HF transimpedance amplifier with a 50 Ω series resistor, see D1002163. It is available at the rack and hooked to the trigger PD input of the field box. There doesn't seem to be any termination on the rack side! The DC level of the PMC readback was about 120 mV, whereas the ILS PD showed about 1 V. The transimpedance for the PMC locking diode is 1 kΩ, where it is 820 Ω for the ILS diode. No oscillation was observed. We also looked at the signal on the RF spectrum analyzer. But, when we tried it for the ILS, the HPO tripped. End of expedition.
16:51 Daniel and Keita out to LVEA to work on PMC
17:09 Hugh reports that ISI_CONF reporting ETMY at BLEND_45mHz_SC_useism is actually incorrect. It's actually set to the 250mHz.
17:13 LASER tripped (injection locking) while Keita and Daniel working in PSL rack. Jason coming to control room to restart.
17:56 Relocking resumed
17:57 Cheryl on site
Added 175ml to the crystal chiller
We had at least one lockloss tonight that seemed to be caused by SR2 glitches. Screenshot is attached.
It seems like SR2 was noisier after maintence day today.
But our main problem tonight was that the refl WFS (which we have taken in and out several times over the last week) don't work when the microseism is around the 90th percentile or more.
For such high microseism situations, it may be worth switching back to the 45 mHz blends for all the test-mass chambers, with or without sensor correction.
We are leaving the IFO in observe, but there is scattering from ISCT1 because we can't move to REFL wfs with the higher ground motion. This is something to look at in the morning, but it caused us many locklosses tonight.
The IMC WFS offsets that were working early last week don't seem repeatable tonight.
Nutsinee switched the test mass ISIs to BLEND_45_SC_useism, that went OK except for some large glitches when switch ETMX, but when I tried switching to REFL WFS again we dropped the lock. We probably need to look at finding a better matrix for refl WFS and getting rid of the oscialltion in the centering and IMC WFS.
Speculation about REFL WFS. Yesterday I was concerned that PR2 had moved what seemed like a lot (8-10urad) when I did the Inital Alignment. I would expect something smaller like 2urad. I couldn't find a cause for that, but I did notice IM4 also changed by 20urad in yaw. A change of 20urad in yaw of IM4, assuming PRM moved to match the change of the PRC input beam, would propigate to the REFL WFS, and my estimate for the change in beam position at REFL WFS to be 168um. I don't know the beam size on REFL WFS, but the IMC WFS is about 250um, so if REFL WFS is about the same, the 168um is a beam position change of ~70%.
This is a comparison between the ISS, ILS and PMC signals before (REF traces) and after the changes in the electroncis and the modulation depth, see 31095.
A few observations:
A better plot showing the relationship between the ILS and PMC mixer and HVMon signals.
Reducing the ILS gain by 16 dB increases the noise seen by the PMC by the same amount below 1 kHz. This change reduced the ILS ugf from ~10 kHz down to ~1 kHz.
The PMC PZT is decribed in alog 30729:
The ILS PZT is
by the way, I noticed this issue because I saw the SDF differences at the end stations were not the same. Since this is a guardian controlled feature, it might be argued that it would be Not_Monitored. Were that the case...
In case you are wondering what difference this can make...
The attached asd shows the ETMs 12 and 6 hours ago. 12 hours ago (ref traces) the ETMY was in 250mHz blends while the ETMX was in the 45mHz blend. 6 hours ago was after the ETMY was actually switched to 45mHz blends.
The thick green and brownish curves become much more like the others after the blend switching and moving the blend gain peaking away from the secondary microseismic peak.
The second attachment are trends of theX & Y ARM SUSPOINT Motions based on the ISI's onboard GS13s and the ETMY and ITMY SWSTAT showing when the ITMY blend switched but the ETMY did not and then this morning when the ETMY switched to the same blend as the ITMY. When the two ISIs are in different blends, the motion is clearly larger although based on these trends. Based on the XARM Motion though, not clearly a better blend overall.
ETMY_ST1_CONF wasn't switching properly because I had found an issue with the guardian when trying to write some different configurations. I forgot to revert the code to a properly working state. Sorry. I've fixed the configuration, and tested that it works on ETMY.