I don't think I had focussed the input arm cameras yet when Sheila made this log about moving CPs, https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=30979, so I offset CPY to see if I could see where the light was hitting. I could see a moving spot on an apparent table weight in front of the PR2 scraper baffle (screenshots show nominal and pitch of -150 on CPY, bright spot is at the very bottom of nominal image). However, I could not see it on the "swiss chese" baffle in front of HAM2 when I looked through a viewport, so it is likely dumped on the vacuum enclosure near HAM3 or the "eye" baffle between HAM3 and the long IMC tube, and from there reflects onto HAM3. Sheila's 0.1 Hz excitations did not show that this was a current problem. Nevertheless, from looking at the camera, I agree with her that a lower-scatter parking place is at CPY pitch < -70. This might also give us even more head room for some of the ~100 Hz scattering associated with vibration excitation of the input arm vacuum enclosure.
The reason I dont think it is a simple path off of PR3 is that the spot is quite large and diffuse.
Locked at NLN since before my shift started. Lost lock at ~3:30UTC for unknown reason. Sheila did a bit of IMC work during the downtime. Seems to be relocking nicely at the moment.
TITLE: 11/05 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 68.2743Mpc
INCOMING OPERATOR: Travis
SHIFT SUMMARY:
H1 locked most of the shift and getting back to NLN wasn't too tough (other than a Beam Diverter issue, which is noted below).
LOG:
NOTE: Bubba would like a rough idea of # of people here between now and tomorrow. (we had 2-3 people most of the day)
While turning off unneeded lights for the weekend, I checked the PSL chillers. I went ahead and topped off the crystal chiller with 175mL since it was around 1/4 full between min & max.
Before driving in this morning, I checked the H1 Summary Page. This page has been down for almost a day (L1's Summary Page appears to be fine).
Duncan M and Joe A are on it; ldas admins at LHO need to give it a kick.
Thanks, David---Just heard back from Duncan. A few things for me & for all operators (tagging this alog with OpsInfo) with regards to Service Issues With Summary Pages:
I have posted a note to myself to update the 'Report an issue' URL to point to https://git.ligo.org/detchar/ligo-summary-pages/. If in doubt, an email to detchar@ligo.org is best, to cast a wide net.
I'd suggest posting the detchar group email, too. Or atleast tag these pages with detchar in some way, because my old memory only knows these pages as the "Summary Pages" & I don't see any mention of Detchar on the pages...well, I guess I do see it in the web address name. Just want an easy/quicker way to address this in the future.
Perhaps we can add "check the Summary Pages" as an item in our Operator Shift Check Sheet?
TITLE: 11/05 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Observing at 68.4202Mpc
OUTGOING OPERATOR: TJ
CURRENT ENVIRONMENT:
Wind: 7mph Gusts, 3mph 5min avg
Primary useism: 0.04 μm/s
Secondary useism: 0.67 μm/s
QUICK SUMMARY:
TJ handed over a nicely locked & steady H1 (flat and only 1 visible glitch on the range); been Undisturbed for last ~7.5hrs (the Observatory Mode was set to Locked, but I set it to Observing.)
Other Notes:
Robert is here and would like to do PEM Injections with a locked H1.
Bubba is on-site to search for possible leak in the water system.
H1 Summary Page down (making separate alog).
useism is high (~0.6um/s). But our handy SEI CONFIG says we are good at the WINDY state (until we get up to 1.0um/s). Staying put.
Whoops did not mean to comment here...and I don't know how to delete comments. :-/
TITLE: 11/05 Owl Shift: 07:00-15:00 UTC (00:00-08:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Aquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Corey
SHIFT SUMMARY: Lost lock as I sat down, the ITMY swinging happened to me as well. Misaligning and aligning didn't seem to help, but it eventually damped on its own. Then went up to Coil Drivers before it lost it again, but brought it back to NLN and it has been sitting there since with the intent bit Observing. I was planning on doing some tasks for commissioners but couldn't connect to the oscope, and I didnt want to go into the LVEA to disturb the lock. I will try these tomorrow.
LOG:
Up and observing for a bit while it looks like livingston is about to be up, then I'll drop the intent bit to do some tasks from commissioners.
TITLE: 11/05 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Aligning
INCOMING OPERATOR: TJ
SHIFT SUMMARY: IFO has been up and down all night for various reasons. After 2 of the 4 locklosses, ITMy swung around for a long time, slowing relocking. Stefan looked for the cause but was unable to find one. Also, the ASAIR and POPAIR signals have been oscillating during full lock. Matt and Stefan are looking into the cause of this, but as of the end of my shift have not come to a conclusion. I ran A2L for 2.5 of the locks, the 0.5 being that I was halfway through the 2nd script when we lost lock. Stefan said that it was useless to run A2L with the AS and POP oscillations, so I haven't run it for the last lock. Microseism is still above the 90%ile level. Wind is calm. Locked at ~70MPc.
LOG:
23:59 Updated LSC and ASC SDF OBSERVE.snap files per Hugh's request. If the Owl shift operator has a lockloss, he'd like to update the LSC and ASC DOWN.snaps as well.
Evan, Stefan, Matt (writing)
We've been seeing for a few days the bouncing of the harmonics of the 1kHz violins (exact harmonics, not higher violin modes). Watching these on a fast spectrum shows an ~18s period, in which the harmonics appear out of the noise and grow by more than a factor of 10 as the beating at 1kHz reaches a maximum. The 1kHz peak (in which the violin modes are unresolved) is only changing by a factor of about 5 (see attached).
We noticed that the sidebands buildups started to oscillate at the microseism once we switched to low-noise (lower ASC bandwidth ?). We suspect something with ITMY or its suspension is mistuned, because it would hardly damp after4 lock-loss. Not sure whether it is related.
Stefan, Kiwamu, Matt
To test the theory that the ILS is gain limited, and that more gain might help with DARM noise, we measured the loop and used the TF input to add some gain at low frequency.
The open-loop TF was as previously reported (see 31121 and photos to follow). We had computed that an SR560 with a gain of 10 and a pole at 100Hz accompanied by a 10kHz passive low-pass would make for a good test without destabilizing the loop (see attachment 1). With this test-rig attached the TFB and TFIN ports on the ILS front panel (photos to follow), we relocked the IFO and found that the coherence with DARM had been reduced as expected (see attachment 2). Noteabley the PMC HV signal was significantly reduced (black to brown in attachment 2), indicating that this gain was preventing noise in the PMC. Unfortunately, this simple test was not able to apply much gain to the 1kHz, where the highest coherence with DARM is seen.
Kiwamu has offered to investigate the possibility of using a new CDS FE running at 65kHz to implement a tailored gain profile which will suppress the 1kHz peak and other HPO features while keeping the ILS loop stable.
Photos!
As Sheila pointed out, back in May we had a 25W lock that lasted >5h and never showed any indication of jitter peaks.
The attached plot 1 shows spectra from May 17 (25W), July 16 (40W) and Nov 3 (25W). Note that the May 17 spectrum is taken 4h into the lock.
Plot 2 shows inputy power and range of the May 17 lock.
Plot 3 shows all TCS settings of the May lock.
Plot 4 shows all TCS settings currently used.
Based on this, I would like to turn off the ITM ring heaters.
Yes, we should probably try this, and we will set them soon.
In the attached screenshot the red traces are from the short lock right before we turned on the ITM ring heaters on June 28th, the black traces are from a longer lock July 1st, and we do have worse noise at a few hundred Hz.
At this time we had the same ETM ring heater settings as now (1.5Watts on each), CO2X was at 0.4 Watts (we currently are at 0.2 but Kiwamu thinks it should be increased), and CO2Y was at 0.3W.