12:37 PDT DAQ restart to add following VAC channels
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_VI122_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_VI122_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_VI136_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_VI136_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_VI192_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_VI192_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_VI196_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_VI196_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
I was about to take a screen shot of the beams from the various PSL cavities when all of a sudden the screen went black. The laser tripped. I haven't performed any forensics but it looks like the same problem as last night.
On Monday, I went to EndX to retrieve data from the anemometers I had around the wind fence, and found the set up kind of trashed. The ultrasonic gust sensor had been blown over, which sounds like a common issue with that setup from the past. The fall, however, broke some of the plastic pieces that the screws holding the head of the sensor together. I think the sensor is still functional, but it will need to be glued back together.
One of the other cup anemometers may have been attacked by a bird, or possibly a vehicle. The cable had been unplugged from the sensor, drug more than 20 feet and the sheath and a couple wires had been cut. I would normally blame a bird for that, but the copper tube I had secured the anemometer to was also bent. It's possible that a gust of wind had bent the post, but neither of the other posts were similarly bent. There are tire tracks up around the fence, but it's hard to say how old they are, it's likely they are left over from the fence install, and none of them come very close to the post. Finally, the batteries in the logger for the 3 cup anemometers had worked free of their connections, so the logger only collected about 3 days worth of data, even though they were installed for a week and a half. The batteries are held in place by a plastic strap, and this strap probably got soft in the sun, which allowed the batteries to work they way free.
I don't know what we can do to keep birds (or bees, they seem to really like the fence) away from the outside instruments, but couple of other things I'll get for next time:
1. Cones or flags to mark a stay clear around the fence.
2. Weights and guy lines for the ultrasonic sensor, after I get it back together.
3. A foam shim to secure the batteries in the cup anemometer datalogger.
Kyle, Chandra Starting step down of heating of Vertex RGA -> Closed calibration gas bottle isolation valves and reduced variacs (except one supplying turbo inlet) by 10% -> Will need access to continue this process every few hours or so throughout the day.
~1100 - 1110 hrs. local -> Kyle in and out of LVEA -> Reduced variacs 10%
~1325 - 1335 hrs local -> Kyle in and out of LVEA -> Closed 1 1/2" turbo isolation valve, reduced variacs 10%
1455 - 1300 hrs. local -> Kyle in and out of LVEA -> De-energized variacs, i.e. killed heat to Vertex RGA
[Sheila, Kiwamu, Terra, Jenne]
Next up: Try dither loop to hold ETMX spot position in yaw to prevent spot position movement on BS. Separate SOFT loops to X and Y, use offset of XSOFT yaw to hold ETMX spot position constant. Alternatively (or simultaneously), dither BS and demodulate with several different signals at the same time, to understand better how the spot is moving.
We ended up moving PR2 (our uncontrolled recycling optic), and walking it with the POP_A offset. This allowed us to get to a PRC gain of 31.6 by the O1 standard, but without the sideband powers tanking. We think that this was promising, and will come back to it tomorrow. Once we decide that we're happy, we should re-do the green initial alignment setpoints yet again (including the beatnote PDs, which weren't done earlier today) to set this as our reference alignment. Attached is a big screenshot of where we were most happy. Also attached is the PR2 offset screen, time-machined back to before we started moving PR2.
TITLE: 09/01 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Aquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Sep
SHIFT SUMMARY: Lots of commissioning, a PSL trip, and a small earthquake.
LOG:
the h1susprocpi model had two entries in the testpoint.par file (dcuids 52 and 71). The correct ID is 71. This was causing a failure to open testpoints on this model. After the testpoint.par file was corrected, I restarted h1susprocpi and testpoints are now available.
Attached are trends of the various flow sensors in the PSL. Comparison of the timestamps shows that the high power oscillator
tripped because of a flow rate problem with the AMP circuit. The problem does not lie within the 4 laser heads, leaving either
the front end power amplifier, or the 4 crystal chambers.
Unfortunately checking the 4 crystal chambers requires dismantling the laser. The vortex flow sensor in the AMP circuit
is relatively new. The other object in that circuit is the power amplifier module. An inspection mirror might be able to
afford a view of the plumbing underneath the housing.
One can see that the flow rate in the AMP circuit drops before the output of the front end laser drops, and that the output
power of the front end laser drops before the high power oscillator. I think the sequence of events is the following:
1. flow rate problem in the AMP circuit trips the flow watch dog of the front end laser
2. the switching off of the front end laser breaks the injection locking of the high power oscillator
3. the loss of injection locking results in a power drop in the high power oscillator which then trips the power watch dog
4. the power watch dog switches the high power oscillator off
Jeff spotted this this morning in the crystal chiller circuit filter. Wasn't there a couple of days ago. Might be the cause of last night's syncope.
Filed FRS #6132.
WP6121: Jonathan, Carlos, Jim, Dave
Tuesday Aug 30, the Remote Access Control system (RACCESS) was turned on during the times we have operator coverage (Mon-Fri, 8am - 4pm Pacific). This is a 'real life' test of the system, and an opportunity for everyone to get familiar with it before it is on full-time during O2. Any problems with the system should be communicated as an LHO-CDS FRS ticket.
To provide more visibility of who is logged into the border machine (cdsssh) I have expanded the RACCESS portion of the CDS_OVERVIEW medm (center right area).
WP 6131. Jonathan's new daqd code which is running on both h1fw0 and h1fw1 exports more signals via EPICS channels. At 12:42PDT today I restarted the DAQ with a new H1EDCU_DAQ.ini file which includes the full set of EPICS channels. I also added the standard set of channels for the h1fw2 frame writer.
I have extended the DAQ Overview medm to show trend file sizes, and added links to open the detailed screens for fw0 and fw1 which show the full diagnostic suite.
I redid our green initial alignment setpoints, in hopes that CHARD won't have such a large input offset when we try to engage the loops.
Unsuccessful at damping ITMX 15520 Hz PI several times tonight (previously seen here and here). We find that larger damping drive does not equal greater damping: When this mode was test driven and damped after the thermal transient at 50 W, a best gain and phase was found for damping. When the mode began to ring up later, increasing gain (by some large amound but still under saturation) or flipping sign and/or changing phase only resulted in faster ringup. This is true when still far below DAC saturation levels. It seems as if there is some gain sweet spot that must be found.
--- --- ---
We had three occasions to damp ITMX 15520 Hz mode during the night. During the first, I successfully damped and it then rerang up (perhaps due to offset adjustments?) and lost lock. During the second and third I was not able to damp the mode and avoided lockloss only by decreasing power 50 W --> 25 W.
Below you see the mode first ring up and my gain trial and error response until I settle at 10000 and the mode is fully damped. Soon after, you see the mode ring up again right after the yaw offset step from ~ -0.02 --> -0.01. Note we started with a small negative gain so I just assumed we had actually been ringing up the mode the past few days.

During the second 50 W lock, damping was already running at the gain and phase settings that were effective at damping the first ring up above (+10000 gain, -60deg). Despite this, you see the mode slowly rising ~3 hours into the 50 W lock and my gain adjustments trying to damp. Note that here I start with some mostly successful positive gain (i.e. shallow slope) yet both raising the gain and flipping the gain sign cause the mode to ring up. I tried phase changes at this point too but existing was best. I avoided lockloss by decreasing power to 25 W, allowing mode to ring down enough to damp, then powering back up. I also rechecked my gain and phase at 50 W (post thermal transient time) and it would still drive and damp with a very steep slope. Still, an hourish later the mode began to ring up. I found similar behavior in the third attempt as the second and had to decrease power to avoid lockloss.

Things to note:
Things to try:
I've plotted the HOM spacing (H1:TCS-SIM_IFO_XARM_HOM_SPACING_HZ_OUTPUT) from the TCS simulator vs the RMS of the 15520Hz PI mode. It seems to be ringing up consistently when the simulated HOM spacing edges up over 5034Hz.

The first plot shows the HOM spacing at the same time that Terra sees and tries to damp the mode. You can see the HOM spacing edge up over three hours as the surface curvature is becoming flatter. The 15520 mode starts to ring up and then Terra is able to damp it. It looks like the subsequent yaw offset increased the power in the arm very slightly which has, in turn, increased the heating of the optic. The estimated HOM spacing increases, most likely increasing the parametric gain of the 15520Hz mode in the process.

The second plot shows the HOM spacing over a larger time frame (19 hours) and the associated RMS of the 15520Hz mode. Every time the HOM spacing reaches 5034Hz, the mode starts to ring up.
Some notes:
In fact, it's not too much of a stretch to use the parametric gain of the modes in conjunction with the simulated HOM spacing to continually update the total absorbed power in the arms.
Thanks Aidan.
I've attached a look at the HOM spacing during two times that this same mode rang up while no damping was being applied (DAMP_GAIN = 0), unlike the times you looked at. First time the mode rang up when HOM spacing was about the same as you found, 5035. Second (indicated with red arrow), rang up around 5025. Both locks were 50 W.
Expecting PT120 to be 3 x 10-9 torr -> Don't see logged activity to explain -> am on road and not able to trend data etc.
Probably gauge problem since 114 did not follow.
Some more gauges -
Pressure change was due to incorrect wiring of PT-120 during Beckhoff transition and was brought to light when Gerardo incorporated signal wiring for AIPs and needed to turn off PT180 this week. Pressure reading now is correct (and the same as it was in Q2 2016). We should check other gauges to be sure they are wired properly and reading correct pressures. Wearing laser safety glasses contributes to issues like this because visibility is compromised.
Executive summary: * Good news - as expected, the 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither is gone (at least at this sensitivity level) * Bad news - low-frequency 1-Hz combs remain, and some new low-frequency combs & lines have appeared Some details:
I analyzed the 56.8406Hz comb with coherence tool and here are the results. The same structure is found to be significant in 35 channels in ER9, distributed in ISI, SUS, PEM and LSC subsystems. Among all the 35 channels, 22 of them does not have a range up to its 11th harmonic, 625.25 Hz.
Keith indicated in his slog entry that a DAQ malfunction is suspected to be the ultimate source of this, and these findings suggest it's in an EX electronics crate.
Here are a few interesting observations:
The 9th harmonic at 511.56Hz is the weakest in most channels, sometimes buried in noises.
In some PEM channels, there are missing lines at low frequency (< 200 Hz) and high frequency (> 500 Hz).
In PEM and ISI channels, there seems to be another comb structure with a frequency slightly larger than 56.8406Hz coexists. That one is usually most significant at its third harmonics.
Generally, the structure is more clearly seen in LSC, SUS and ISI channels
Sample plots from each subsystem:
Figure 1: We can see the 56.8406Hz comb structure exists with its 9th harmonic weakest in ISI.
Figure 2: PEM channels have more noises and, as in ISI channels, the other comb structure coexists.
Figure 3: SUS channels do not have enough range up its 11th harmonic but we can see its first and second harmonic here.
Figure 4: There is only one channel from LSC but the structure is very clear.
All plots and a list of channels are attached in the zip file.
Just to be clear. Here are the channels that the coherence tool is finding the comb. This is what is supporting Keith's assumption that the problems could be in an EX electronics crate. Channels List: H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ_data H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ_data
I chased Comb 23 (type K) in Keith’s post, shown in Keith's original post as
This comb has an offset of 153.3545 Hz and a fundamental frequency of 0.0884Hz. It starts at 153.3545 Hz and goes up to its 11th harmonic, 154.3272 Hz. As is listed in Keith's txt file:
Comb 23 (type K, offset=153.354500): Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz) Bar (logarithmic) K 153.3545 ( 0 X 0.0884) 1.844961e-19 **** K 153.4429 ( 1 X 0.0884) 1.949756e-19 **** K 153.5314 ( 2 X 0.0884) 2.165192e-19 ***** K 153.6198 ( 3 X 0.0884) 2.181833e-19 ***** K 153.7082 ( 4 X 0.0884) 2.457840e-19 ***** K 153.7966 ( 5 X 0.0884) 2.243089e-19 ***** K 153.8851 ( 6 X 0.0884) 2.709562e-19 ***** K 153.9735 ( 7 X 0.0884) 2.499596e-19 ***** K 154.0619 ( 8 X 0.0884) 2.562208e-19 ***** K 154.1503 ( 9 X 0.0884) 1.945817e-19 **** K 154.2388 ( 10 X 0.0884) 1.951777e-19 **** K 154.3272 ( 11 X 0.0884) 1.703353e-19 ****
I found the comb structure in two channels of ISI subsystem.
Figure 1 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13RZ_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:
https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314371
Figure 2 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13Z_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:
https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314374
In the plots of both channels, we can see a comb structure stands out at the positions of harmonics. We are wondering about the reason for this:
Why these seismic isolation channels?
This post is supplementary to the first post about coherence analysis result for the 56.8406Hz Comb at
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28619
The first post is addressing the 56.8406Hz comb found in Keith's original post (marked as D comb):
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28364
Information about this comb from the txt file in Keith's post:
Comb 35 (type D, offset=0.000000): Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz) Bar (logarithmic) D 56.8406 ( 1 X 56.8406) 3.968800e-17 *********** D 113.6811 ( 2 X 56.8406) 1.773964e-17 ********** D 170.5217 ( 3 X 56.8406) 7.121580e-18 ********* D 227.3622 ( 4 X 56.8406) 3.232935e-18 ******** D 284.2028 ( 5 X 56.8406) 1.166094e-18 ******* D 341.0433 ( 6 X 56.8406) 1.007273e-18 ******* D 397.8839 ( 7 X 56.8406) 5.962059e-19 ****** D 454.7245 ( 8 X 56.8406) 3.752194e-19 ***** D 511.5650 ( 9 X 56.8406) 2.577108e-19 ***** D 568.4056 ( 10 X 56.8406) 1.964393e-19 **** D 625.2461 ( 11 X 56.8406) 1.891774e-19 **** --------------------------------------------------------------
Besides the 35 channels found in the original post, 7 more channels are found to be relevant to the 56.8406Hz Comb. Two new subsystems, ASC and HPI are involved.
These new channels are:
H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
So updated channel list is (42 channels in total):
H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RX_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RY_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RZ_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ
Attached images are sample plots from ASC and HPI subsystem.
Full results are also attached.
Here are the coherence search results of all the single lines in ER9 data, which are listed in Keith’s post. I found 29 of all the 198 lines on the list and posted the results on my homepage here:
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~duo.tao/ER9_single_lines/index.html
Since there seem to be some confusions about which PD has what kind of analog filtering and sent to which channel, here it is.
I'm quite certain about HPO output before AOM (which is "Power monitor PD" in D1002929) and ISS 1st loop monitors, but not that sure about "monitor PD"s in D1002164. E-travellers are incomplete (they don't say which one is installed where), so I'm just listing the nominal values for these "monitor PD"s.
| What | PD name on D0902114 | Circuit type | Analog out | Transimpedance (Ohm) | Analog filter | Channel | Note | Can you find Filter MEDM from sitemap as of this writing? |
| HPO output before AOM | PD1 |
Power monitor PD, D1002929 |
DC | 3.3k DC |
H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC, DC_LF |
DC_LF is digital downstream of DC, EPICS output is visible as "Power Monitor PD" on PSL_LASER MEDM. |
No | |
| AC | 16.5k AC | 5k HPF nominal | H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC | No | ||||
| ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC | ISS_PDA, ISS_PDB |
Inner loop diodes, D1001998 |
"Filt" on the board, "AC" on the box | 660 DC |
z=[0.0723;2700;0.0707] Hz, p=[3.3607;130;3.12;2300] |
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA and PDB |
No dewhite, output is calibrated in volts. |
No |
|
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_DC and PDB_DC |
Digitally low-passed version of PDA and PDB, but has a DC gain of 5 so the DC agrees with the analog of "DC" output on the PD box. | Yes, from ISS | ||||||
| H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_AC and PDB_AC | Dewhitened and AC-coupled version of PDA and PDB, has a gain to match PDA_DC and PDB_DC | Yes, from ISS | ||||||
| H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL | AC-coupled RIN made by PDA_AC/PDA_DC. | Yes, from ISS | ||||||
| DC on the box | 3.3k DC | N/A | N/A | |||||
| Frontend output before HPO but after FI | PD_AMP | DC on the box | 20k DC nominal | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC | EPICS output visible as "FRONTEND POWER" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | ||
| AC on the box | 100k AC nominal | 5k HPF nominal | AMP_AC | No | ||||
| Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO | PD_ISO | PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 | DC | 750 DC nominal | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC | EPICS output visible as "PDISO" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | |
| AC | 3.75k nominal | 5k HPF nominal | ISO_AC | No | ||||
| Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? | PD_INT | PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 | DC | 1k? | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC | EPICS output visible as "PDINT" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | |
| AC | 5k? | 5k HPF nominal | INT_AC | No | ||||
| HPO Brewster plate rejection | PD_BP | PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 | DC | 1.5k nominal | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC | EPICS output visible as "PDBP" on PSL_LASER MEDM. | No | |
| AC | 7.5k nominal | 5k HPF nominal | BP_AC | No |
I cannot edit the above entry any more, so here is an additional table showing digital filters.
| what | analog | channel | model | digital | ||
| HPO output before AOM | DC | H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC | h1pslpmc | None | ||
| H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC_LP | p=0.05 | |||||
| AC | H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC | None | ||||
| ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC |
"filt" or AC (DC-coupled) |
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA (and PDB) | h1psliss | cts/volt conversion factor | ||
| H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_AC |
z= [0.0707, 0.0723], p= [0.3, 0.3] and 2nd order 0.3Hz Butterworth HP in addition to dewhite, DC gain of 5. |
|||||
| H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_DC | Some random LPF (p=[0.034141, 0.037449, 10430]), DC gain of 5. | |||||
| H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL | None | |||||
| Frontend output before HPO but after FI | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC | h1pslpmc | Gain of 0.00349223 | ||
| AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_AC | Gain of 0.000613 | ||||
| Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC | Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112) | |||
| AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_AC | Gain of 1 | ||||
| Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC | Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112) | |||
| AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_AC | Gain of 1 | ||||
| HPO Brewster plate rejection | DC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC | Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112) | |||
| AC | H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_AC | Gain of 1 | ||||
| PMC TRANS | ? | H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_TRANS | Gain of 0.0103, p=0.15 | |||
| PMC REFL DC | ? | H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_REFL | Gain of -0.0248015, p=0.15 | |||
ISS inner loop (or 1st loop) diode has different filter than written above, it turns out. But 130Hz was a zero, not pole. 2.7k was a pole, not zero.
effective trans impedance = 660 Ohm (that's 0.2*3.3k).
z=[0.0707; 0.0723; 130]
p=[3.12; 3.36; 2.34k; 2.70k]
Tagging DetChar, IOO, and ISC for future reference.
Seems like I was really, really tired, here's a correction of correction. Really sorry for the confusion.
My original table was correct.
Inner loop PD is equivalen of 660Ohm, zp=([0.0707;0.0723;2.7k],[3.12;3.36;130;2.34k]).
the Verbal Alarms code was logging to the ops home directory. Prior to the move of this home directory (WP5658) I have modified the code to log to a new directory: /ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms We restarted the program at 14:04 and verified the log files are logging correctly.
These verbal log files actually live one level deeper, in /ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms/Verbal_logs/ For the current month, the log files live in that folder. However, at the end of every month, they're moved into the dated subfolders, e.g. /ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms/Verbal_logs/2016/7/ The text files themselves are named "verbal_m_dd_yyyy.txt". Unfortunately, these are not committed to repo where these logs might be viewed off site. Maybe we;ll work on that. Happy hunting!
The Verbal logs are now copied over to the web-exported directory via a cronjob. Here, they live in /VerbalAlarms_logs/$(year)/$(month)/
The logs in /ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms/Verbal_logs/ will now always be in their month, even the curent ones.
Preliminary forensics show that indeed this laser trip happened for the same reason as last night's (and Saturday's): something glitched with the FE flow (either a glitch in the flow meter or an actual glitch in the flow), which took the crystal chiller offline, which then shut down the entire laser. The power watchdogs never tripped, only the flow interlocks for the FE and the crystal chiller. In the first attachment the FE flow dropped just before the HPO began to lose power. The second attachment shows the FE flow interlock tripping also just before the HPO begins to lose power, while the 3rd shows the FE losing power before the HPO does. This points to a problem in the FE flow as the cause for this PSL trip. The 4th attachment simply shows that the power watchdogs did not trip in this instance.
Filed FRS #6133.