Displaying reports 57021-57040 of 85662.Go to page Start 2848 2849 2850 2851 2852 2853 2854 2855 2856 End
Reports until 12:43, Thursday 01 September 2016
H1 DAQ (CDS)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:43, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29440)
DAQ restart for addition of Vacuum Controls ion pump channels

12:37 PDT DAQ restart to add following VAC channels

+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_II122_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_VI122_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_IBM_VI122_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_II136_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_VI136_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LX_OBM_VI136_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_II192_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_VI192_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_IBM_VI192_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_LOGMA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_LOGMA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_MA]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_MA_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_VOLTS]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_II196_AIP_IC_VOLTS_ERROR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_VI196_AIP_PRESS_TORR]
+[H0:VAC-LY_OBM_VI196_AIP_PRESS_TORR_ERROR]
 

H1 PSL
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:06, Thursday 01 September 2016 - last comment - 12:30, Thursday 01 September 2016(29436)
laser tripped
I was about to take a screen shot of the beams from the various PSL cavities when all of a
sudden the screen went black.  The laser tripped.  I haven't performed any forensics but it
looks like the same problem as last night.
Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 12:30, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29438)

Preliminary forensics show that indeed this laser trip happened for the same reason as last night's (and Saturday's): something glitched with the FE flow (either a glitch in the flow meter or an actual glitch in the flow), which took the crystal chiller offline, which then shut down the entire laser.  The power watchdogs never tripped, only the flow interlocks for the FE and the crystal chiller.  In the first attachment the FE flow dropped just before the HPO began to lose power.  The second attachment shows the FE flow interlock tripping also just before the HPO begins to lose power, while the 3rd shows the FE losing power before the HPO does.  This points to a problem in the FE flow as the cause for this PSL trip.  The 4th attachment simply shows that the power watchdogs did not trip in this instance.

Filed FRS #6133.

Images attached to this comment
H1 SEI
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:10, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29434)
A couple minor catastrophes with wind fence measurements

On Monday, I went to EndX to retrieve data from the anemometers I had around the wind fence, and found the set up kind of trashed. The ultrasonic gust sensor had been blown over, which sounds like a common issue with that setup from the past. The fall, however, broke some of the plastic pieces that the screws holding the head of the sensor together. I think the sensor is still functional, but it will need to be glued back together.

One of the other cup anemometers may have been attacked by a bird, or possibly a vehicle. The cable had been unplugged from the sensor, drug more than 20 feet and the sheath and a couple wires had been cut. I would normally blame a bird for that, but the copper tube I had secured the anemometer to was also bent. It's possible that a gust of wind had bent the post, but neither of the other posts were similarly bent. There are tire tracks up around the fence, but it's hard to say how old they are, it's likely they are left over from the fence install, and none of them come very close to the post. Finally, the batteries in the logger for the 3 cup anemometers had worked free of their connections, so the logger only collected about 3 days worth of data, even though they were installed for a week and a half. The batteries are held in place by a plastic strap, and this strap probably got soft in the sun, which allowed the batteries to work they way free.

I don't know what we can do to keep birds (or bees, they seem to really like the fence) away from the outside instruments, but couple of other things I'll get for next time:

1. Cones or flags to mark a stay clear around the fence.

2. Weights and guy lines for the ultrasonic sensor, after I get it back together.

3. A foam shim to secure the batteries in the cup anemometer datalogger.

LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:57, Thursday 01 September 2016 - last comment - 15:18, Thursday 01 September 2016(29433)
~0905 - 0915 hrs. local -> Chandra and Kyle in and out of LVEA (north side of OMC tube by HAM4)
Kyle, Chandra

Starting step down of heating of Vertex RGA -> Closed calibration gas bottle isolation valves and reduced variacs (except one supplying turbo inlet) by 10% -> Will need access to continue this process every few hours or so throughout the day.  
Comments related to this report
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 13:21, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29442)
~1100 - 1110 hrs. local -> Kyle in and out of LVEA -> Reduced variacs 10%
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 13:58, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29444)
~1325 - 1335 hrs local -> Kyle in and out of LVEA -> Closed 1 1/2" turbo isolation valve, reduced variacs 10%
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - 15:18, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29447)
1455 - 1300 hrs. local -> Kyle in and out of LVEA -> De-energized variacs, i.e. killed heat to Vertex RGA
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:06, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29430)
Work toward low noise tonight

[Sheila, Kiwamu, Terra, Jenne]

Next up:  Try dither loop to hold ETMX spot position in yaw to prevent spot position movement on BS.  Separate SOFT loops to X and Y, use offset of XSOFT yaw to hold ETMX spot position constant.  Alternatively (or simultaneously), dither BS and demodulate with several different signals at the same time, to understand better how the spot is moving.

We ended up moving PR2 (our uncontrolled recycling optic), and walking it with the POP_A offset.  This allowed us to get to a PRC gain of 31.6 by the O1 standard, but without the sideband powers tanking.  We think that this was promising, and will come back to it tomorrow.  Once we decide that we're happy, we should re-do the green initial alignment setpoints yet again (including the beatnote PDs, which weren't done earlier today) to set this as our reference alignment.  Attached is a big screenshot of where we were most happy.  Also attached is the PR2 offset screen, time-machined back to before we started moving PR2. 

Images attached to this report
LHO General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:02, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29429)
Ops Eve Shift Summary

TITLE: 09/01 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Aquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Sep
SHIFT SUMMARY: Lots of commissioning, a PSL trip, and a small earthquake.
LOG:

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:20, Wednesday 31 August 2016 (29427)
h1susprocpi model restarted to fix test point problem

the h1susprocpi model had two entries in the testpoint.par file (dcuids 52 and 71). The correct ID is 71. This was causing a failure to open testpoints on this model. After the testpoint.par file was corrected, I restarted h1susprocpi and testpoints are now available.

H1 PSL
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:56, Wednesday 31 August 2016 - last comment - 12:37, Thursday 01 September 2016(29426)
HPO trip
Attached are trends of the various flow sensors in the PSL.  Comparison of the timestamps shows that the high power oscillator
tripped because of a flow rate problem with the AMP circuit.  The problem does not lie within the 4 laser heads, leaving either
the front end power amplifier, or the 4 crystal chambers.

    Unfortunately checking the 4 crystal chambers requires dismantling the laser.  The vortex flow sensor in the AMP circuit
is relatively new.  The other object in that circuit is the power amplifier module.  An inspection mirror might be able to
afford a view of the plumbing underneath the housing.

    One can see that the flow rate in the AMP circuit drops before the output of the front end laser drops, and that the output
power of the front end laser drops before the high power oscillator.  I think the sequence of events is the following:
 1. flow rate problem in the AMP circuit trips the flow watch dog of the front end laser
 2. the switching off of the front end laser breaks the injection locking of the high power oscillator
 3. the loss of injection locking results in a power drop in the high power oscillator which then trips the power watch dog
 4. the power watch dog switches the high power oscillator off
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 09:03, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29432)
Jeff spotted this this morning in the crystal chiller circuit filter.  Wasn't there a couple of days ago.
Might be the cause of last night's syncope.
Images attached to this comment
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 12:37, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29439)

Filed FRS #6132.

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:22, Wednesday 31 August 2016 (29425)
Remote Access Control turned on for testing during operator shifts

WP6121: Jonathan, Carlos, Jim, Dave

Tuesday Aug 30, the Remote Access Control system (RACCESS) was turned on during the times we have operator coverage (Mon-Fri, 8am - 4pm Pacific). This is a 'real life' test of the system, and an opportunity for everyone to get familiar with it before it is on full-time during O2. Any problems with the system should be communicated as an LHO-CDS FRS ticket.

To provide more visibility of who is logged into the border machine (cdsssh) I have expanded the RACCESS portion of the CDS_OVERVIEW medm (center right area).

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:11, Wednesday 31 August 2016 (29424)
Additional DAQ Frame Writer diagnostics added to DAQ

WP 6131. Jonathan's new daqd code which is running on both h1fw0 and h1fw1 exports more signals via EPICS channels. At 12:42PDT today I restarted the DAQ with a new H1EDCU_DAQ.ini file which includes the full set of EPICS channels. I also added the standard set of channels for the h1fw2 frame writer.

I have extended the DAQ Overview medm to show trend file sizes, and added links to open the detailed screens for fw0 and fw1 which show the full diagnostic suite.

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:29, Wednesday 31 August 2016 (29423)
Redid green initial alignment setpoints

I redid our green initial alignment setpoints, in hopes that CHARD won't have such a large input offset when we try to engage the loops.

H1 ISC
terra.hardwick@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:55, Wednesday 31 August 2016 - last comment - 01:33, Friday 02 September 2016(29408)
PI work

Unsuccessful at damping ITMX 15520 Hz PI several times tonight (previously seen here and here). We find that larger damping drive does not equal greater damping: When this mode was test driven and damped after the thermal transient at 50 W, a best gain and phase was found for damping. When the mode began to ring up later, increasing gain (by some large amound but still under saturation) or flipping sign and/or changing phase only resulted in faster ringup. This is true when still far below DAC saturation levels. It seems as if there is some gain sweet spot that must be found. 

--- --- ---

We had three occasions to damp ITMX 15520 Hz mode during the night. During the first, I successfully damped and it then rerang up (perhaps due to offset adjustments?) and lost lock. During the second and third I was not able to damp the mode and avoided lockloss only by decreasing power 50 W --> 25 W.

Below you see the mode first ring up and my gain trial and error response until I settle at 10000 and the mode is fully damped. Soon after, you see the mode ring up again right after the yaw offset step from ~ -0.02 --> -0.01. Note we started with a small negative gain so I just assumed we had actually been ringing up the mode the past few days.

During the second 50 W lock, damping was already running at the gain and phase settings that were effective at damping the first ring up above (+10000 gain, -60deg). Despite this, you see the mode slowly rising ~3 hours into the 50 W lock and my gain adjustments trying to damp. Note that here I start with some mostly successful positive gain (i.e. shallow slope) yet both raising the gain and flipping the gain sign cause the mode to ring up. I tried phase changes at this point too but existing was best. I avoided lockloss by decreasing power to 25 W, allowing mode to ring down enough to damp, then powering back up. I also rechecked my gain and phase at 50 W (post thermal transient time) and it would still drive and damp with a very steep slope. Still, an hourish later the mode began to ring up. I found similar behavior in the third attempt as the second and had to decrease power to avoid lockloss. 

Things to note: 

Things to try:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
aidan.brooks@LIGO.ORG - 12:11, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29437)

I've plotted the HOM spacing (H1:TCS-SIM_IFO_XARM_HOM_SPACING_HZ_OUTPUT) from the TCS simulator vs the RMS of the 15520Hz PI mode. It seems to be ringing up consistently when the simulated HOM spacing edges up over 5034Hz.

The first plot shows the HOM spacing at the same time that Terra sees and tries to damp the mode. You can see the HOM spacing edge up over three hours as the surface curvature is becoming flatter. The 15520 mode starts to ring up and then Terra is able to damp it. It looks like the subsequent yaw offset increased the power in the arm very slightly which has, in turn, increased the heating of the optic. The estimated HOM spacing increases, most likely increasing the parametric gain of the 15520Hz mode in the process.

The second plot shows the HOM spacing over a larger time frame (19 hours) and the associated RMS of the 15520Hz mode. Every time the HOM spacing reaches 5034Hz, the mode starts to ring up.

Some notes:

  • The HOM spacing is an estimate that shows the correct linear behaviour but is, currently, not scaled correctly. The calculation uses the dynamic ROC of the optics to dead-reckon the cavity Gouy Phase. There's two parts:
    • The cold cavity value (with the RHs on) is around 4964Hz. This is based on the measured ROC and the estimated response of the surface curvatures to the RH. Essentially, this is an offset.
    • The change in the HOM spacing with power is dependent on the total absorbed power in the ITM and ETM. Currently, the calculated arm powers in the TCS_SIM model (H1:TCS-SIM_XARM_POWER) are dependent on the TR_X_SUM values but are not calibrated correctly. The estimated peak power in the arms at around 90kW which is probably low. Also, the absorbed power is dependent on the absorption coefficient for each optic.
  • Nevertheless, the change in the HOM spacing will still show the correct behaviour. 

In fact, it's not too much of a stretch to use the parametric gain of the modes in conjunction with the simulated HOM spacing to continually update the total absorbed power in the arms.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
terra.hardwick@LIGO.ORG - 01:33, Friday 02 September 2016 (29456)

Thanks Aidan. 

I've attached a look at the HOM spacing during two times that this same mode rang up while no damping was being applied (DAMP_GAIN = 0), unlike the times you looked at. First time the mode rang up when HOM spacing was about the same as you found, 5035. Second (indicated with red arrow), rang up around 5025. Both locks were 50 W. 

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:06, Tuesday 30 August 2016 - last comment - 10:37, Thursday 01 September 2016(29398)
pt120 higher than expected
Expecting PT120 to be 3 x 10-9 torr -> Don't see logged activity to explain -> am on road and not able to trend data etc.
Comments related to this report
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - 21:44, Tuesday 30 August 2016 (29401)

Probably gauge problem since 114 did not follow.

Images attached to this comment
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - 21:53, Tuesday 30 August 2016 (29402)

Some more gauges - 

Images attached to this comment
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 10:37, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29435)
Pressure change was due to incorrect wiring of PT-120 during Beckhoff transition and was brought to light when Gerardo incorporated signal wiring for AIPs and needed to turn off PT180 this week. Pressure reading now is correct (and the same as it was in Q2 2016). We should check other gauges to be sure they are wired properly and reading correct pressures. 

Wearing laser safety glasses contributes to issues like this because visibility is compromised.
H1 DetChar
keith.riles@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:20, Tuesday 12 July 2016 - last comment - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016(28364)
Narrow lines in ER9 H1 DARM
Executive summary: 

* Good news - as expected, the 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither is gone (at least at this sensitivity level)
* Bad news - low-frequency 1-Hz combs remain, and some new low-frequency combs & lines have appeared 

Some details:
  • I initially looked at 15 hours of 30-minute FScan DELTAL_EXTERNAL SFTs (30 SFTs) generated during ER9 and was aghast at how bad the low-frequency spectrum looked, with a pervasive 0.485308-Hz comb ranging up to its 446th harmonic at 216.4 Hz, but when I exclude the three hours of SFTs when the 2-second ALS- glitches were present, things don't look quite so bad (see figure 1 for a sample without removal and figure 4 with removal). I dewhiten according to the new 6-pole / 6-zero, 0.3 / 30 Hz algorithm.
  • The infamous 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither tracked down and killed here is gone (at least at this sensitivity level and these SFT statistics). As a result the high-frequency band (up to 2 kHz) is remarkably smooth with only violin modes and sporadic isolated artifacts.
  • The 1-Hz comb with 0.5-Hz offset remains pervasive, but other prior 1-Hz or near-1-Hz combs with different offsets (e.g., 0.25 Hz) are not strong.
  • On the other hand, there is a new near-1-Hz comb (0.996798-Hz spacing) visible to its 204th harmonic at ~203.3 Hz.
  • There is also a new near-2-Hz comb (1.999951-Hz spacing) visible on approximate odd-integer-Hz frequencies, starting from ~9 Hz and visible up to ~175 Hz. This is likely the same 2-Hz comb reported in May by Bryn Pearlstone (which Ansel Neunzert kindly reminded me about today).
  • There is a "new" 56.8406-Hz comb visible to its 11th harmonic at ~625.25 Hz, which in hindsight I can see was buried in the O1 spectrum (I overlooked the pattern and indicated the teeth as isolated lines). This time the pattern was strong enough to jump out at me and to jog my memory that this comb was seen in H2 1-arm data in 2012 in both the arm feedback channel and a quiet sensor-noise-dominated OSEM channel. This seemed to indicate a DAQ system problem at the time. I can see from O1 NoEMi line lists that this comb is pervasive in ISI, SUS and PEM channels at the corner station and both end stations.
  • The old "K" comb-on-comb (0.088425-Hz fine comb attached to teeth of a coarse 76.3235-Hz comb) has more 11 more fine teeth visible on the lowest-frequency coarse-tooth comb.
  • The old calibration line at 35.9 Hz has been moved to 35.3 Hz. The new excitation lines at 33.7 and 34.7 Hz are easily visible, but not as strong as the primary calibration lines. I found these changes documented here.
  • There are sporadic new isolated lines here and there (indicated in line list - see below)
  • There is a "crab-killer" broad bump centered at about 58.6 Hz which degrades sensitivity in the Crab Pulsar band of interest (~59.3 Hz). On the other hand, the whole noise floor is elevated w.r.t. O1, anyway. So it may be premature to worry about the bump.
Figure 1 - spectrum for 50-100 Hz when the 3-hour 2-second-glitches stretch is included (~0.5 Hz lines marked with 'h' for 'half') Figure 2 - 0-2000 Hz (removing 3-hour bad stretch from here on) Figure 3 - 20-50 Hz sub-band Figure 4 - 50-100 Hz sub-band Figure 5 - 100-200 Hz sub-band Figure 6 - 1300-1400 Hz sub-band (illustration of how clean the high-frequency band is) Also attached are a larger set of zipped sub-band spectra and a lines list (excluding the bad 3-hour stretch). Note that because the statistics here are two orders of magnitude smaller than used for the full O1 run report, I am not yet removing lines seen then that may yet re-emerge with more accumulated post-O1 data. So many of the line labels in these figures are buried in the noise fuzz for now. Line label codes in figures: b - Bounce mode (quad suspension) r - Roll mode (quad suspension) Q - Quad violin mode and harmonics B - Beam splitter violin mode and harmonics C - Calibration lines M - Power mains (60 HZ) O - 1-Hz comb (0.5-Hz offset) o - weaker 1-Hz and near-1-Hz combs (various offsets, including zero) H - 99.9989-Hz comb J - 31.4127 and 31.4149-Hz combs K - 0.088425-Hz comb-on-comb t - 1.999951-Hz, 2.07412-Hz and 2.07423-Hz combs D - 56.8406-Hz comb x - single line (not all singlets in the vicinity of quad violin modes are marked, given the known upconversion)
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 12:04, Monday 25 July 2016 (28619)DetChar

I analyzed the 56.8406Hz comb with coherence tool and here are the results. The same structure is found to be significant in 35 channels in ER9, distributed in ISI, SUS, PEM and LSC subsystems. Among all the 35 channels, 22 of them does not have a range up to its 11th harmonic, 625.25 Hz.

 

Keith indicated in his slog entry that a DAQ malfunction is suspected to be the ultimate source of this, and these findings suggest it's in an EX electronics crate.

 

Here are a few interesting observations:

  • The 9th harmonic at 511.56Hz is the weakest in most channels, sometimes buried in noises.

  • In some PEM channels, there are missing lines at low frequency (< 200 Hz) and high frequency (> 500 Hz).

  • In PEM and ISI channels, there seems to be another comb structure with a frequency slightly larger than 56.8406Hz coexists. That one is usually most significant at its third harmonics.

  • Generally, the structure is more clearly seen in LSC, SUS and ISI channels

 

Sample plots from each subsystem:

Figure 1: We can see the 56.8406Hz comb structure exists with its 9th harmonic weakest in ISI.

Figure 2: PEM channels have more noises and, as in ISI channels, the other comb structure coexists.

Figure 3: SUS channels do not have enough range up its 11th harmonic but we can see its first and second harmonic here.

Figure 4: There is only one channel from LSC but the structure is very clear.

 

All plots and a list of channels are attached in the zip file.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
nelson.christensen@LIGO.ORG - 11:14, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28642)DetChar, PEM
Just to be clear. Here are the channels that the coherence tool is finding the comb. This is what is supporting Keith's assumption that the problems could be in an EX electronics crate.

Channels List:
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ_data

H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ_data
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 18:55, Thursday 28 July 2016 (28717)DetChar

I chased Comb 23 (type K) in Keith’s post, shown in Keith's original post as

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/uploads/28364_20160712211751_CombPlots_H1-CAL-DELTAL-EXT_ER9-Cleaned_100_200_Hz.png

 

This comb has an offset of 153.3545 Hz and a fundamental frequency of 0.0884Hz. It starts at 153.3545 Hz and goes up to its 11th harmonic, 154.3272 Hz. As is listed in Keith's txt file:

Comb 23 (type K, offset=153.354500):
Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
K  153.3545 (   0  X    0.0884) 1.844961e-19   ****
K  153.4429 (   1  X    0.0884) 1.949756e-19   ****
K  153.5314 (   2  X    0.0884) 2.165192e-19   *****
K  153.6198 (   3  X    0.0884) 2.181833e-19   *****
K  153.7082 (   4  X    0.0884) 2.457840e-19   *****
K  153.7966 (   5  X    0.0884) 2.243089e-19   *****
K  153.8851 (   6  X    0.0884) 2.709562e-19   *****
K  153.9735 (   7  X    0.0884) 2.499596e-19   *****
K  154.0619 (   8  X    0.0884) 2.562208e-19   *****
K  154.1503 (   9  X    0.0884) 1.945817e-19   ****
K  154.2388 (  10  X    0.0884) 1.951777e-19   ****
K  154.3272 (  11  X    0.0884) 1.703353e-19   ****

 

I found the comb structure in two channels of ISI subsystem.

Figure 1 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13RZ_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314371

Figure 2 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13Z_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314374

In the plots of both channels, we can see a comb structure stands out at the positions of harmonics. We are wondering about the reason for this:

 

Why these seismic isolation channels?


Images attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 00:15, Friday 29 July 2016 (28721)

This post is supplementary to the first post about coherence analysis result for the 56.8406Hz Comb at

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28619

The first post is addressing the 56.8406Hz comb found in Keith's original post (marked as D comb):

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28364

Information about this comb from the txt file in Keith's post:

Comb 35 (type D, offset=0.000000):
  Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
D   56.8406 (   1  X   56.8406) 3.968800e-17   ***********
D  113.6811 (   2  X   56.8406) 1.773964e-17   **********
D  170.5217 (   3  X   56.8406) 7.121580e-18   *********
D  227.3622 (   4  X   56.8406) 3.232935e-18   ********
D  284.2028 (   5  X   56.8406) 1.166094e-18   *******
D  341.0433 (   6  X   56.8406) 1.007273e-18   *******
D  397.8839 (   7  X   56.8406) 5.962059e-19   ******
D  454.7245 (   8  X   56.8406) 3.752194e-19   *****
D  511.5650 (   9  X   56.8406) 2.577108e-19   *****
D  568.4056 (  10  X   56.8406) 1.964393e-19   ****
D  625.2461 (  11  X   56.8406) 1.891774e-19   ****
--------------------------------------------------------------

Besides the 35 channels found in the original post, 7 more channels are found to be relevant to the 56.8406Hz Comb. Two new subsystems, ASC and HPI are involved.

These new channels are:

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ

H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ

So updated channel list is (42 channels in total):

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RX_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RY_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RZ_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ
 

Attached images are sample plots from ASC and HPI subsystem.

Full results are also attached.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29431)

Coherence Search Results of All the Single Lines in ER9 Data

Here are the coherence search results of all the single lines in ER9 data, which are listed in Keith’s post. I found 29 of all the 198 lines on the list and posted the results on my homepage here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~duo.tao/ER9_single_lines/index.html

H1 PSL
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:30, Friday 29 April 2016 - last comment - 12:52, Thursday 01 September 2016(26879)
Which PSL monitor PDs correspond to which signal, and which DCC document.

Since there seem to be some confusions about which PD has what kind of analog filtering and sent to which channel, here it is.

I'm quite certain about HPO output before AOM (which is "Power monitor PD" in D1002929) and ISS 1st loop monitors, but not that sure about "monitor PD"s in D1002164. E-travellers are incomplete (they don't say which one is installed where), so I'm just listing the nominal values for these "monitor PD"s.

What PD name on D0902114 Circuit type Analog out Transimpedance (Ohm) Analog filter Channel Note Can you find Filter MEDM from sitemap as of this writing?
HPO output before AOM PD1

Power monitor PD, D1002929

DC 3.3k DC  

H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC, DC_LF

DC_LF is digital downstream of DC, EPICS output is visible as "Power Monitor PD" on PSL_LASER MEDM.

No
AC 16.5k AC 5k HPF nominal H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC   No
ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC ISS_PDA, ISS_PDB

Inner loop diodes, D1001998

"Filt" on the board, "AC" on the box 660 DC

z=[0.0723;2700;0.0707] Hz,

p=[3.3607;130;3.12;2300]

H1:PSL-ISS_PDA and PDB

No dewhite, output is calibrated in volts.

No

H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_DC and PDB_DC

Digitally low-passed version of PDA and PDB, but has a DC gain of 5 so the DC agrees with the analog of "DC" output on the PD box. Yes, from ISS
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_AC and PDB_AC Dewhitened and AC-coupled version of PDA and PDB, has a gain to match PDA_DC and PDB_DC Yes, from ISS
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL AC-coupled RIN made by PDA_AC/PDA_DC. Yes, from ISS
DC on the box 3.3k DC   N/A   N/A
Frontend output before HPO but after FI PD_AMP

PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047

DC on the box 20k DC nominal   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC EPICS output visible as "FRONTEND POWER" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC on the box 100k AC nominal 5k HPF nominal AMP_AC   No
Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO PD_ISO PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 DC 750 DC nominal   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC EPICS output visible as "PDISO" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC 3.75k nominal 5k HPF nominal ISO_AC   No
Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? PD_INT PSL monitor PD,  D1002164, T100047 DC 1k?   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC EPICS output visible as "PDINT" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC 5k? 5k HPF nominal INT_AC   No
HPO Brewster plate rejection PD_BP PSL monitor PD, D1002164, T100047 DC 1.5k nominal   H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC EPICS output visible as "PDBP" on PSL_LASER MEDM. No
AC 7.5k nominal 5k HPF nominal BP_AC   No
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 10:07, Wednesday 11 May 2016 (27113)

I cannot edit the above entry any more, so here is an additional table showing digital filters.

what analog channel model digital
HPO output before AOM DC H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC h1pslpmc None
  H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_DC_LP p=0.05
AC H1:PSL-PWR_HPL_AC None
ISS 1st loop diodes after PMC "filt" or AC
(DC-coupled)
H1:PSL-ISS_PDA (and PDB) h1psliss cts/volt conversion factor
  H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_AC

z= [0.0707, 0.0723], p= [0.3, 0.3] and 2nd order 0.3Hz Butterworth HP in addition to dewhite, DC gain of 5.

  H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_CALI_DC Some random LPF (p=[0.034141, 0.037449, 10430]), DC gain of 5.
    H1:PSL-ISS_PDA_REL None
Frontend output before HPO but after FI DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_DC h1pslpmc Gain of 0.00349223
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_AMP_AC Gain of 0.000613
Back-propagation rejected by FI between frontend and HPO DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_DC Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112)
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_ISO_AC Gain of 1
Back-propagating HPO mode leaking from HPO cavity? DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_DC Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112)
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_INT_AC Gain of 1
HPO Brewster plate rejection DC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_DC Gain set to 1 on May 11 2016 (alog 27112)
AC H1:PSL-OSC_PD_BP_AC Gain of 1
PMC TRANS ? H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_TRANS Gain of 0.0103, p=0.15
PMC REFL DC ? H1:PSL-PWR_PMC_REFL Gain of -0.0248015, p=0.15
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 15:44, Tuesday 30 August 2016 (29392)

ISS inner loop (or 1st loop) diode has different filter than written above, it turns out. But 130Hz was a zero, not pole. 2.7k was a pole, not zero.

effective trans impedance = 660 Ohm (that's 0.2*3.3k).

z=[0.0707; 0.0723; 130]

p=[3.12; 3.36; 2.34k; 2.70k]

jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 08:45, Wednesday 31 August 2016 (29409)DetChar, IOO, ISC
Tagging DetChar, IOO, and ISC for future reference.
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 12:52, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29441)

Seems like I was really, really tired, here's a correction of correction. Really sorry for the confusion.

My original table was correct.

Inner loop PD is equivalen of 660Ohm, zp=([0.0707;0.0723;2.7k],[3.12;3.36;130;2.34k]).

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:15, Wednesday 16 December 2015 - last comment - 23:58, Wednesday 31 August 2016(24264)
Verbal Alarms code changed to log to the logging directory
the Verbal Alarms code was logging to the ops home directory. Prior to the move of this home directory (WP5658) I have modified the code to log to a new directory:

/ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms

We restarted the program at 14:04 and verified the log files are logging correctly.
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 14:45, Friday 26 August 2016 (29336)DetChar, GRD, ISC, SYS
These verbal log files actually live one level deeper, in
/ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms/Verbal_logs/

For the current month, the log files live in that folder. 
However, at the end of every month, they're moved into the dated subfolders, e.g.
/ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms/Verbal_logs/2016/7/

The text files themselves are named "verbal_m_dd_yyyy.txt".

Unfortunately, these are not committed to repo where these logs might be viewed off site. Maybe we;ll work on that.

Happy hunting!
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 23:58, Wednesday 31 August 2016 (29428)

The Verbal logs are now copied over to the web-exported directory via a cronjob. Here, they live in /VerbalAlarms_logs/$(year)/$(month)/

The logs in /ligo/logs/VerbalAlarms/Verbal_logs/ will now always be in their month, even the curent ones.

Displaying reports 57021-57040 of 85662.Go to page Start 2848 2849 2850 2851 2852 2853 2854 2855 2856 End