Displaying reports 57761-57780 of 85714.Go to page Start 2885 2886 2887 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 End
Reports until 13:49, Friday 29 July 2016
H1 SUS (ISC, SUS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:49, Friday 29 July 2016 (28736)
All HAM6 SUS Reference Transfer Functions Gathered Prior to HAM6 Vent
J. Kissel

In prep for next week's HAM6 vent, I've gathered driven transfer functions of all DOFs of the H1SUSOMC, H1SUSOM1, H1SUSOM2, and H1SUSOM3. As expected, they look identical to what Stuart measured prior to the last time we vented HAM6 (see LHO aLOG 17653). Note, all alignment and ISC control was OFF, so I did not see any of the problems with OM1 that Stuart mentions (and I only learned about those troubles after re-reading Stuart's entry -- too late now to investigate further). Note the models were never tuned and/or fit to measured data for these suspension types, so it's not surprising that resonances don't particularly match up with model.

We'll gather more some quick data in-air before the doors come off next week, and then again right after the doors go on (especially given that we'll have replaced the OMC breadboard). We'll compare against this data set once we're pumped back down.

Data templates have been committed to in:
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OMCS/H1/OMC/SAGM1/Data/
2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_R_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_T_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_V_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/OM1/SAGM1/Data/
2016-07-29_1611_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1611_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1611_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/OM2/SAGM1/Data/
2016-07-29_1640_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1640_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1640_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/OM3/SAGM1/Data/
2016-07-29_1642_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1642_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml
2016-07-29_1642_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml
These data were exported in the same location under similar names. 

I was delighted to find that all of the matlab analysis software still works like a charm [thanks Stuart & Arnaud!], specifically, 
/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/Common/MatlabTools/
plotHTTS_dtttfs_M1.m
plotallhtts_tfs_M1.m

/ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OMCS/Common/MatlabTools/
plotOMCS_dtttfs.m
plotallomcs_tfs.m

I'd updated the plotall*.m scripts first to receive all of the measurements Stuart has taken recently of his SUS before adding my new measurements (No I didn't. I forgot, and had to reconcile after). The latest version of those scripts have been committed accordingly.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:38, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 08:07, Wednesday 17 August 2016(28737)
OMC alignment turned off

The OMC alignment servos keep turning on, even though the OMC guardian is paused.  I found that it gets turned on in engage_wfs_centering whenever we do any ASC since it's in a generate states function.  So, I have commented out that line, but we must uncomment it when we have the OMC back and are ready to use it again.  It is currently line 113 in ISC_GEN_STATES.

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 08:47, Monday 01 August 2016 (28768)

Maybe this should have a work permit to make sure this isn't forgotten; or at least some mechanism to undo the change in a timely manner.

corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - 08:07, Wednesday 17 August 2016 (29145)

Not sure when it happened, but looks like this has been restored to normal & uncommented (probably some time after the HAM6 work last week).

Making a note in Operator Sticky Notes wiki.

H1 General (OpsInfo)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:16, Friday 29 July 2016 (28735)
Ops Mid-Day Update:

State of H1:  vent prep, parasitic down-time work, camera crew is here

Details:

Currently:

LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:17, Friday 29 July 2016 (28728)
more Y-end RGA leak testing
see also https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28644

Today I further torqued the RGA analyzer to protective nipple flange that was "gappy" from the factory.  The factory supplied fasteners are an inadequate alloy and limit the factory assembler's ability to achieve the desired "flange-to-flange" joint (it is 2016, why can't they just use silver plated A-286 like the rest of the free world?).  Anyway, I was able to improve the situation and further close this joint using metric wrenches (arghh! again with the "it is 2016...free world") and elbow grease but couldn't go as far as I would have liked.  I again leak tested this joint (7 x 10-9 torr*L/sec baseline) and, again, found it not to be leaking but the real proof will be after it goes through the upcoming bake cycle.  Additionally, I opened the Nitrogen and Krypton isolation valves so as to allow leak testing of their double sided 1.33" CF joints.  No leaks (6 x 10-9 torr*L/sec baseline) here either.  Next up will be to bake everything (will likely start Wednesday, Aug. 3rd during HAM6 vent activities).  

Leaving area with Nitrogen and Krypton isolation valves closed, local turbo off and isolated and leak detector off and decoupled.  
H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:03, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 14:44, Friday 29 July 2016(28729)
DBB Scans FAMIS# 6583

File extensions - .001= 35W path .002=200W

RPN - 35W; no changes worth mentioning.

          200W; noise is higher in the 300Hz-2k range.

FRQ - 35W; seems to hav a higher degree of error correction. Resonances that aren't noticible in recent past scans appear starting at ~7Hz/20Hz and seem to have harmonics out to ~100Hz

         200W; These same resonances mentioned above seem present in this path as well. Last weeks scan by comparison show these resonances propogating out as far as 200Hz

PNT - 35W; This looks much better than last weeks which had 2x and 2y higher than the rest by a factor of two from 1Hz-30Hz.

         200W; This weeks scan looks almost identical to last weeks scan with the outliers being 2x and 2y all the way out to 2K

MSC - 35W; HOM ct/ mode matching looks pretty good with the exception of TEM10 mode which is a bit higher than reference. Significantly better looking scan than last week.

         200W; Mode matching looks a  little sloppy. No change from last week.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 14:44, Friday 29 July 2016 (28739)

Should also add that the out-of-loop PD in the ISS in iss_rpn-001.pdf (PDB in this case, the blue trace) is seeing roughly an order of magnitude more noise than the reference.  This is the 3rd time the ISS scan has been run since we resurrected the DBB after the HPO turn on, and the other scans match this one.  What is odd is is not a RPN noise increase of this magnitude in either the FE or HPO RPN scans.  Unknown at this time where the noise is coming from.

H1 SEI
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:04, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 11:24, Friday 29 July 2016(28727)
H1 ISI CPS Noise Spectra Check - Weekly

Note that there are people in the LVEA during this measurement.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 11:24, Friday 29 July 2016 (28731)

It is not HUGE, but the ETMY V2 and ITMX H3, have higher levels than in previous measurements.

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:52, Friday 29 July 2016 (28725)
WHAM6 HEPI Locked onto Hard Stops

Locked down the HEPI on its hard stops while Isolated.  Positions kept as close as possible.  Here is where it ended up wrt the nominally servo position:

dof delta
X 5.4um
Y 3.7um
Z -7.2um
RX 4.6urad
RY -0.6urad
RZ 4.6urad

You can also see these on the HEPI CART BIAS medm accessed from the OVERVIEW; look for DC BIAS.

H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:51, Friday 29 July 2016 - last comment - 11:29, Friday 29 July 2016(28724)
Morning Meeting: OMC is down, plans being made for venting next week

OMC / Vent plans

 

- OMC is down, we're venting HAM6 and going in next week

 

- Spare OMC needs some attention before it can be installed - may not be ready by Tuesday

 

- we may go into HAM6 on Monday to diagnose the situation

 

- HAM6 is locked down

 

- cleanrooms around HAM6 being turned on today and will be on all weekend

 

Tasks:

 

- CDS - Richard - taking advantage of down time to 

 

- EY - Kyle wants to bake RGA installed on BSC6, not valved in, next week

- EX - Kyle wants to bake RGA installed on BSC6, not valved in, next week

 

- PSL - Peter and Jason next Monday and Tuesday - have PSL for alignment and calibrations

 

- Rich Abbott is here and has a film crew here for today and tomorrow (related to chip manufacturer)

--- in LVEA up to 10AM

 

- JeffK - getting transfer functions of HAM6 optics for reference

 

- EY BRS is off - see morning update and Jim's alog from last night

 

- Hugh - HAM6 guardian is off and needs to stay off - screenshot of HAM6 HEPI and HAM6 ISI attached

Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 11:29, Friday 29 July 2016 (28732)

Regarding the HAM6 Guardian.  The HAM6 SEI chamber manager is paused so it will not try to isolate HEPI.  HEPI will not isolate and should be kept READY.  The ISI is fine and should be kept isolated by responding to trips at the watchdog as usual.  Be sure to use the ISI Guardian and not the HAM6 SEI chamber manager if guardian attention is needed.

H1 General (OpsInfo, SEI)
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:26, Friday 29 July 2016 (28723)
Ops Morning Update:

State of H1: IMC is locked, guardian in Down state, Hugh in LVEA at HAM6, LVEA is laser safe

Attached: screenshot of current state of BRS, also see Jim's alog 28703

Images attached to this report
H1 AOS
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:57, Friday 29 July 2016 (28722)
LVEA transitioned to LASER SAFE
The LVEA is now LASER SAFE.

At this point in time, please do not remove viewport covers, or the tubes connecting
the table enclosure(s) to their relevant viewports.
H1 General
edmond.merilh@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:02, Thursday 28 July 2016 (28720)
Shift Summary - Evening
TITLE: 07/29 Eve Shift: 23:00-07:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Lock Aquisition
INCOMING OPERATOR: Aug
SHIFT SUMMARY:
LOG:
3:00 PI Mode 2 rang up. I was able to damp it by flipping the gain phase.
3:10 As mode 2 rang down, mode 17 begaan to rise a little and hold steady. Gonna watch it.
3:20 Kiwamu informs me that this mode 17 can't be damped unles we are in Low Noise Mode. 
4:01 Just waiting for the lock to break due to PI that I can't damp. :/. Heading home.
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:07, Thursday 28 July 2016 - last comment - 12:11, Friday 29 July 2016(28719)
Pressure bump at Y-end
The pressure change seen in the attached is typical of the Y-arm gauges with PT410 responding first followed by subsequent responses in time as it propagates toward the CS.  Looks like a real change and occurs 15 mins or so after a seismic system change was made at the Y-end (Jim W?) or not.  IP9 has not changed voltage -> Will monitor from home.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 11:20, Friday 29 July 2016 (28730)
Y2-8 IP is not pumping. Controller doesn't power past 350 V and 430 mA. Gerardo & Chandra reseated cable at both ends and rebooted controller. Next Gerardo & Richard will test HV cable. The controller initially read back an error code 02. Gerardo contacted Gamma for troubleshooting and waiting to hear back (their online screens are currently not available).
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - 12:11, Friday 29 July 2016 (28734)
UPDATE:  bad HV cable
H1 AOS (SEI, SUS)
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:16, Thursday 28 July 2016 - last comment - 09:00, Friday 29 July 2016(28706)
Opitcal Lever 7 Day Trends

Attached are screenshots for the past 7 days optical ever trends for PIT, YAW, and SUM.

This completes FAMIS 4686

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 09:00, Friday 29 July 2016 (28726)

Everything looks normal with these trends.  The large step in the ETMy SUM trend is due to the laser swap (here) and the large steps in the ITMx and ITMy SUM trends are due to the increase in whitening gain (here).

H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:01, Thursday 28 July 2016 - last comment - 11:48, Friday 29 July 2016(28702)
Locking with different macroscopic SRC lengths

Hugh, Evan

Over the course of several locks, we moved the HAM4 HEPI in the y direction by several hundred microns in order to see the interferometer behavior at 2 W with the SRC locked on different fringes.

For a 1.1 mm shift in the HEPI position (i.e., a 2.2 mm shift in the one-way SRC length), there is no discernible trend in the rf sideband buildups or in the DARM pole frequency.

We would like to repeat this test with SR2 offsets as well.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 11:48, Friday 29 July 2016 (28733)

Craig C, Rana

We've been looking at the Gouy phase in the LHO SRC to understand the mode hopping, matching, etc.

The attached PDF shows something like the diagonal elements of the Jacobian: the change in the round trip Gouy phase as a function of each of 4 distances and 4 Radii of Curvature. The goal for the RT Gouy was 38 deg assuming a 50 km thermal lens.

 

In the plots the zero position on the x-axis is the nominal position of each optic according to (E1400205) the IAS as-built numbers OR the RoC according to the specs/measurements in optics database (galaxy.ligo.caltech.edu/optics).

The first page of the PDF shows the situation in the nominal warm state (ITM thermal lens with 50 km focal length). The second page is with no thermal lens. I have ignored the curvature of the CP as well as the cold lens in the ITM due to index inhomogeneity; assuming for now that these effects are small.

As you can see by flipping between pages 1 & 2, the ITM thermal lens stabilizes the SRC by increasing the round trip phase shift by ~15 deg.

 

So, is the LHO mode hopping problem due to a 0.05% RoC increase of SR3? Or is the LLO SRC more stable because it has a short RoC?

Is it possible that the alignment trouble with the LHO SRC can be mitigated by increasing the Gouy phase shift? If so, perhaps we could determine this by translating the HAM4/5 HEPI as well as pushing on the M1 stages of the SUS. If it goes in the right direction, perhaps we can make a bigger correction using the screws on HAM4 and get more like a 1 cm motion of the SR3-SR2 length without venting the main volume.

 

Uncertainties:

  • The placement of the SR2 and the SR3 has a small uncertainty in the x & z axes, but the y-direction (the important one for the SRC) has an uncertainty of +/- 1.5 mm since the measurement method is different.
  • The RoC uncertainty on the SR3 is ~15 mm or dRoC/Roc ~ 0.05%. This corresponds to a Gouy phase deficit of  ~15 deg.
  • The RoC uncertainty of the SR2 is the next most important parameter, but even a 0.1% error (standard off-the-shelf tolerance) would not be so bad.
  • We are very insensitive to the distance between the ITM and SR3, as well as the SR2-SRM distance.
  • Similarly, there is no conceivable distortion of the SRM temporary mirror which could destabilize the SRC.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 DetChar
keith.riles@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:20, Tuesday 12 July 2016 - last comment - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016(28364)
Narrow lines in ER9 H1 DARM
Executive summary: 

* Good news - as expected, the 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither is gone (at least at this sensitivity level)
* Bad news - low-frequency 1-Hz combs remain, and some new low-frequency combs & lines have appeared 

Some details:
  • I initially looked at 15 hours of 30-minute FScan DELTAL_EXTERNAL SFTs (30 SFTs) generated during ER9 and was aghast at how bad the low-frequency spectrum looked, with a pervasive 0.485308-Hz comb ranging up to its 446th harmonic at 216.4 Hz, but when I exclude the three hours of SFTs when the 2-second ALS- glitches were present, things don't look quite so bad (see figure 1 for a sample without removal and figure 4 with removal). I dewhiten according to the new 6-pole / 6-zero, 0.3 / 30 Hz algorithm.
  • The infamous 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither tracked down and killed here is gone (at least at this sensitivity level and these SFT statistics). As a result the high-frequency band (up to 2 kHz) is remarkably smooth with only violin modes and sporadic isolated artifacts.
  • The 1-Hz comb with 0.5-Hz offset remains pervasive, but other prior 1-Hz or near-1-Hz combs with different offsets (e.g., 0.25 Hz) are not strong.
  • On the other hand, there is a new near-1-Hz comb (0.996798-Hz spacing) visible to its 204th harmonic at ~203.3 Hz.
  • There is also a new near-2-Hz comb (1.999951-Hz spacing) visible on approximate odd-integer-Hz frequencies, starting from ~9 Hz and visible up to ~175 Hz. This is likely the same 2-Hz comb reported in May by Bryn Pearlstone (which Ansel Neunzert kindly reminded me about today).
  • There is a "new" 56.8406-Hz comb visible to its 11th harmonic at ~625.25 Hz, which in hindsight I can see was buried in the O1 spectrum (I overlooked the pattern and indicated the teeth as isolated lines). This time the pattern was strong enough to jump out at me and to jog my memory that this comb was seen in H2 1-arm data in 2012 in both the arm feedback channel and a quiet sensor-noise-dominated OSEM channel. This seemed to indicate a DAQ system problem at the time. I can see from O1 NoEMi line lists that this comb is pervasive in ISI, SUS and PEM channels at the corner station and both end stations.
  • The old "K" comb-on-comb (0.088425-Hz fine comb attached to teeth of a coarse 76.3235-Hz comb) has more 11 more fine teeth visible on the lowest-frequency coarse-tooth comb.
  • The old calibration line at 35.9 Hz has been moved to 35.3 Hz. The new excitation lines at 33.7 and 34.7 Hz are easily visible, but not as strong as the primary calibration lines. I found these changes documented here.
  • There are sporadic new isolated lines here and there (indicated in line list - see below)
  • There is a "crab-killer" broad bump centered at about 58.6 Hz which degrades sensitivity in the Crab Pulsar band of interest (~59.3 Hz). On the other hand, the whole noise floor is elevated w.r.t. O1, anyway. So it may be premature to worry about the bump.
Figure 1 - spectrum for 50-100 Hz when the 3-hour 2-second-glitches stretch is included (~0.5 Hz lines marked with 'h' for 'half') Figure 2 - 0-2000 Hz (removing 3-hour bad stretch from here on) Figure 3 - 20-50 Hz sub-band Figure 4 - 50-100 Hz sub-band Figure 5 - 100-200 Hz sub-band Figure 6 - 1300-1400 Hz sub-band (illustration of how clean the high-frequency band is) Also attached are a larger set of zipped sub-band spectra and a lines list (excluding the bad 3-hour stretch). Note that because the statistics here are two orders of magnitude smaller than used for the full O1 run report, I am not yet removing lines seen then that may yet re-emerge with more accumulated post-O1 data. So many of the line labels in these figures are buried in the noise fuzz for now. Line label codes in figures: b - Bounce mode (quad suspension) r - Roll mode (quad suspension) Q - Quad violin mode and harmonics B - Beam splitter violin mode and harmonics C - Calibration lines M - Power mains (60 HZ) O - 1-Hz comb (0.5-Hz offset) o - weaker 1-Hz and near-1-Hz combs (various offsets, including zero) H - 99.9989-Hz comb J - 31.4127 and 31.4149-Hz combs K - 0.088425-Hz comb-on-comb t - 1.999951-Hz, 2.07412-Hz and 2.07423-Hz combs D - 56.8406-Hz comb x - single line (not all singlets in the vicinity of quad violin modes are marked, given the known upconversion)
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 12:04, Monday 25 July 2016 (28619)DetChar

I analyzed the 56.8406Hz comb with coherence tool and here are the results. The same structure is found to be significant in 35 channels in ER9, distributed in ISI, SUS, PEM and LSC subsystems. Among all the 35 channels, 22 of them does not have a range up to its 11th harmonic, 625.25 Hz.

 

Keith indicated in his slog entry that a DAQ malfunction is suspected to be the ultimate source of this, and these findings suggest it's in an EX electronics crate.

 

Here are a few interesting observations:

  • The 9th harmonic at 511.56Hz is the weakest in most channels, sometimes buried in noises.

  • In some PEM channels, there are missing lines at low frequency (< 200 Hz) and high frequency (> 500 Hz).

  • In PEM and ISI channels, there seems to be another comb structure with a frequency slightly larger than 56.8406Hz coexists. That one is usually most significant at its third harmonics.

  • Generally, the structure is more clearly seen in LSC, SUS and ISI channels

 

Sample plots from each subsystem:

Figure 1: We can see the 56.8406Hz comb structure exists with its 9th harmonic weakest in ISI.

Figure 2: PEM channels have more noises and, as in ISI channels, the other comb structure coexists.

Figure 3: SUS channels do not have enough range up its 11th harmonic but we can see its first and second harmonic here.

Figure 4: There is only one channel from LSC but the structure is very clear.

 

All plots and a list of channels are attached in the zip file.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
nelson.christensen@LIGO.ORG - 11:14, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28642)DetChar, PEM
Just to be clear. Here are the channels that the coherence tool is finding the comb. This is what is supporting Keith's assumption that the problems could be in an EX electronics crate.

Channels List:
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ_data

H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ_data
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 18:55, Thursday 28 July 2016 (28717)DetChar

I chased Comb 23 (type K) in Keith’s post, shown in Keith's original post as

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/uploads/28364_20160712211751_CombPlots_H1-CAL-DELTAL-EXT_ER9-Cleaned_100_200_Hz.png

 

This comb has an offset of 153.3545 Hz and a fundamental frequency of 0.0884Hz. It starts at 153.3545 Hz and goes up to its 11th harmonic, 154.3272 Hz. As is listed in Keith's txt file:

Comb 23 (type K, offset=153.354500):
Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
K  153.3545 (   0  X    0.0884) 1.844961e-19   ****
K  153.4429 (   1  X    0.0884) 1.949756e-19   ****
K  153.5314 (   2  X    0.0884) 2.165192e-19   *****
K  153.6198 (   3  X    0.0884) 2.181833e-19   *****
K  153.7082 (   4  X    0.0884) 2.457840e-19   *****
K  153.7966 (   5  X    0.0884) 2.243089e-19   *****
K  153.8851 (   6  X    0.0884) 2.709562e-19   *****
K  153.9735 (   7  X    0.0884) 2.499596e-19   *****
K  154.0619 (   8  X    0.0884) 2.562208e-19   *****
K  154.1503 (   9  X    0.0884) 1.945817e-19   ****
K  154.2388 (  10  X    0.0884) 1.951777e-19   ****
K  154.3272 (  11  X    0.0884) 1.703353e-19   ****

 

I found the comb structure in two channels of ISI subsystem.

Figure 1 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13RZ_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314371

Figure 2 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13Z_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314374

In the plots of both channels, we can see a comb structure stands out at the positions of harmonics. We are wondering about the reason for this:

 

Why these seismic isolation channels?


Images attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 00:15, Friday 29 July 2016 (28721)

This post is supplementary to the first post about coherence analysis result for the 56.8406Hz Comb at

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28619

The first post is addressing the 56.8406Hz comb found in Keith's original post (marked as D comb):

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28364

Information about this comb from the txt file in Keith's post:

Comb 35 (type D, offset=0.000000):
  Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
D   56.8406 (   1  X   56.8406) 3.968800e-17   ***********
D  113.6811 (   2  X   56.8406) 1.773964e-17   **********
D  170.5217 (   3  X   56.8406) 7.121580e-18   *********
D  227.3622 (   4  X   56.8406) 3.232935e-18   ********
D  284.2028 (   5  X   56.8406) 1.166094e-18   *******
D  341.0433 (   6  X   56.8406) 1.007273e-18   *******
D  397.8839 (   7  X   56.8406) 5.962059e-19   ******
D  454.7245 (   8  X   56.8406) 3.752194e-19   *****
D  511.5650 (   9  X   56.8406) 2.577108e-19   *****
D  568.4056 (  10  X   56.8406) 1.964393e-19   ****
D  625.2461 (  11  X   56.8406) 1.891774e-19   ****
--------------------------------------------------------------

Besides the 35 channels found in the original post, 7 more channels are found to be relevant to the 56.8406Hz Comb. Two new subsystems, ASC and HPI are involved.

These new channels are:

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ

H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ

So updated channel list is (42 channels in total):

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RX_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RY_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RZ_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ
 

Attached images are sample plots from ASC and HPI subsystem.

Full results are also attached.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29431)

Coherence Search Results of All the Single Lines in ER9 Data

Here are the coherence search results of all the single lines in ER9 data, which are listed in Keith’s post. I found 29 of all the 198 lines on the list and posted the results on my homepage here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~duo.tao/ER9_single_lines/index.html

Displaying reports 57761-57780 of 85714.Go to page Start 2885 2886 2887 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 End