J. Kissel In prep for next week's HAM6 vent, I've gathered driven transfer functions of all DOFs of the H1SUSOMC, H1SUSOM1, H1SUSOM2, and H1SUSOM3. As expected, they look identical to what Stuart measured prior to the last time we vented HAM6 (see LHO aLOG 17653). Note, all alignment and ISC control was OFF, so I did not see any of the problems with OM1 that Stuart mentions (and I only learned about those troubles after re-reading Stuart's entry -- too late now to investigate further). Note the models were never tuned and/or fit to measured data for these suspension types, so it's not surprising that resonances don't particularly match up with model. We'll gather more some quick data in-air before the doors come off next week, and then again right after the doors go on (especially given that we'll have replaced the OMC breadboard). We'll compare against this data set once we're pumped back down. Data templates have been committed to in: /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OMCS/H1/OMC/SAGM1/Data/ 2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_R_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_T_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_V_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1554_H1SUSOMC_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/OM1/SAGM1/Data/ 2016-07-29_1611_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1611_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1611_H1SUSOM1_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/OM2/SAGM1/Data/ 2016-07-29_1640_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1640_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1640_H1SUSOM2_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/H1/OM3/SAGM1/Data/ 2016-07-29_1642_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_L_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1642_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_P_0p2to50Hz.xml 2016-07-29_1642_H1SUSOM3_M1_WhiteNoise_Y_0p2to50Hz.xml These data were exported in the same location under similar names. I was delighted to find that all of the matlab analysis software still works like a charm [thanks Stuart & Arnaud!], specifically, /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/HTTS/Common/MatlabTools/ plotHTTS_dtttfs_M1.m plotallhtts_tfs_M1.m /ligo/svncommon/SusSVN/sus/trunk/OMCS/Common/MatlabTools/ plotOMCS_dtttfs.m plotallomcs_tfs.m I'd updated the plotall*.m scripts first to receive all of the measurements Stuart has taken recently of his SUS before adding my new measurements (No I didn't. I forgot, and had to reconcile after). The latest version of those scripts have been committed accordingly.
The OMC alignment servos keep turning on, even though the OMC guardian is paused. I found that it gets turned on in engage_wfs_centering whenever we do any ASC since it's in a generate states function. So, I have commented out that line, but we must uncomment it when we have the OMC back and are ready to use it again. It is currently line 113 in ISC_GEN_STATES.
Maybe this should have a work permit to make sure this isn't forgotten; or at least some mechanism to undo the change in a timely manner.
Not sure when it happened, but looks like this has been restored to normal & uncommented (probably some time after the HAM6 work last week).
Making a note in Operator Sticky Notes wiki.
State of H1: vent prep, parasitic down-time work, camera crew is here
Details:
Currently:
see also https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28644 Today I further torqued the RGA analyzer to protective nipple flange that was "gappy" from the factory. The factory supplied fasteners are an inadequate alloy and limit the factory assembler's ability to achieve the desired "flange-to-flange" joint (it is 2016, why can't they just use silver plated A-286 like the rest of the free world?). Anyway, I was able to improve the situation and further close this joint using metric wrenches (arghh! again with the "it is 2016...free world") and elbow grease but couldn't go as far as I would have liked. I again leak tested this joint (7 x 10-9 torr*L/sec baseline) and, again, found it not to be leaking but the real proof will be after it goes through the upcoming bake cycle. Additionally, I opened the Nitrogen and Krypton isolation valves so as to allow leak testing of their double sided 1.33" CF joints. No leaks (6 x 10-9 torr*L/sec baseline) here either. Next up will be to bake everything (will likely start Wednesday, Aug. 3rd during HAM6 vent activities). Leaving area with Nitrogen and Krypton isolation valves closed, local turbo off and isolated and leak detector off and decoupled.
File extensions - .001= 35W path .002=200W
RPN - 35W; no changes worth mentioning.
200W; noise is higher in the 300Hz-2k range.
FRQ - 35W; seems to hav a higher degree of error correction. Resonances that aren't noticible in recent past scans appear starting at ~7Hz/20Hz and seem to have harmonics out to ~100Hz
200W; These same resonances mentioned above seem present in this path as well. Last weeks scan by comparison show these resonances propogating out as far as 200Hz
PNT - 35W; This looks much better than last weeks which had 2x and 2y higher than the rest by a factor of two from 1Hz-30Hz.
200W; This weeks scan looks almost identical to last weeks scan with the outliers being 2x and 2y all the way out to 2K
MSC - 35W; HOM ct/ mode matching looks pretty good with the exception of TEM10 mode which is a bit higher than reference. Significantly better looking scan than last week.
200W; Mode matching looks a little sloppy. No change from last week.
Should also add that the out-of-loop PD in the ISS in iss_rpn-001.pdf (PDB in this case, the blue trace) is seeing roughly an order of magnitude more noise than the reference. This is the 3rd time the ISS scan has been run since we resurrected the DBB after the HPO turn on, and the other scans match this one. What is odd is is not a RPN noise increase of this magnitude in either the FE or HPO RPN scans. Unknown at this time where the noise is coming from.
Note that there are people in the LVEA during this measurement.
It is not HUGE, but the ETMY V2 and ITMX H3, have higher levels than in previous measurements.
Locked down the HEPI on its hard stops while Isolated. Positions kept as close as possible. Here is where it ended up wrt the nominally servo position:
| dof | delta |
| X | 5.4um |
| Y | 3.7um |
| Z | -7.2um |
| RX | 4.6urad |
| RY | -0.6urad |
| RZ | 4.6urad |
You can also see these on the HEPI CART BIAS medm accessed from the OVERVIEW; look for DC BIAS.
OMC / Vent plans
- OMC is down, we're venting HAM6 and going in next week
- Spare OMC needs some attention before it can be installed - may not be ready by Tuesday
- we may go into HAM6 on Monday to diagnose the situation
- HAM6 is locked down
- cleanrooms around HAM6 being turned on today and will be on all weekend
Tasks:
- CDS - Richard - taking advantage of down time to
- EY - Kyle wants to bake RGA installed on BSC6, not valved in, next week
- EX - Kyle wants to bake RGA installed on BSC6, not valved in, next week
- PSL - Peter and Jason next Monday and Tuesday - have PSL for alignment and calibrations
- Rich Abbott is here and has a film crew here for today and tomorrow (related to chip manufacturer)
--- in LVEA up to 10AM
- JeffK - getting transfer functions of HAM6 optics for reference
- EY BRS is off - see morning update and Jim's alog from last night
- Hugh - HAM6 guardian is off and needs to stay off - screenshot of HAM6 HEPI and HAM6 ISI attached
Regarding the HAM6 Guardian. The HAM6 SEI chamber manager is paused so it will not try to isolate HEPI. HEPI will not isolate and should be kept READY. The ISI is fine and should be kept isolated by responding to trips at the watchdog as usual. Be sure to use the ISI Guardian and not the HAM6 SEI chamber manager if guardian attention is needed.
State of H1: IMC is locked, guardian in Down state, Hugh in LVEA at HAM6, LVEA is laser safe
Attached: screenshot of current state of BRS, also see Jim's alog 28703
The LVEA is now LASER SAFE. At this point in time, please do not remove viewport covers, or the tubes connecting the table enclosure(s) to their relevant viewports.
The pressure change seen in the attached is typical of the Y-arm gauges with PT410 responding first followed by subsequent responses in time as it propagates toward the CS. Looks like a real change and occurs 15 mins or so after a seismic system change was made at the Y-end (Jim W?) or not. IP9 has not changed voltage -> Will monitor from home.
Y2-8 IP is not pumping. Controller doesn't power past 350 V and 430 mA. Gerardo & Chandra reseated cable at both ends and rebooted controller. Next Gerardo & Richard will test HV cable. The controller initially read back an error code 02. Gerardo contacted Gamma for troubleshooting and waiting to hear back (their online screens are currently not available).
UPDATE: bad HV cable
Attached are screenshots for the past 7 days optical ever trends for PIT, YAW, and SUM.
This completes FAMIS 4686
Hugh, Evan
Over the course of several locks, we moved the HAM4 HEPI in the y direction by several hundred microns in order to see the interferometer behavior at 2 W with the SRC locked on different fringes.
For a 1.1 mm shift in the HEPI position (i.e., a 2.2 mm shift in the one-way SRC length), there is no discernible trend in the rf sideband buildups or in the DARM pole frequency.
We would like to repeat this test with SR2 offsets as well.
We've been looking at the Gouy phase in the LHO SRC to understand the mode hopping, matching, etc.
The attached PDF shows something like the diagonal elements of the Jacobian: the change in the round trip Gouy phase as a function of each of 4 distances and 4 Radii of Curvature. The goal for the RT Gouy was 38 deg assuming a 50 km thermal lens.
In the plots the zero position on the x-axis is the nominal position of each optic according to (E1400205) the IAS as-built numbers OR the RoC according to the specs/measurements in optics database (galaxy.ligo.caltech.edu/optics).
The first page of the PDF shows the situation in the nominal warm state (ITM thermal lens with 50 km focal length). The second page is with no thermal lens. I have ignored the curvature of the CP as well as the cold lens in the ITM due to index inhomogeneity; assuming for now that these effects are small.
As you can see by flipping between pages 1 & 2, the ITM thermal lens stabilizes the SRC by increasing the round trip phase shift by ~15 deg.
So, is the LHO mode hopping problem due to a 0.05% RoC increase of SR3? Or is the LLO SRC more stable because it has a short RoC?
Is it possible that the alignment trouble with the LHO SRC can be mitigated by increasing the Gouy phase shift? If so, perhaps we could determine this by translating the HAM4/5 HEPI as well as pushing on the M1 stages of the SUS. If it goes in the right direction, perhaps we can make a bigger correction using the screws on HAM4 and get more like a 1 cm motion of the SR3-SR2 length without venting the main volume.
Uncertainties:
Executive summary: * Good news - as expected, the 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither is gone (at least at this sensitivity level) * Bad news - low-frequency 1-Hz combs remain, and some new low-frequency combs & lines have appeared Some details:
I analyzed the 56.8406Hz comb with coherence tool and here are the results. The same structure is found to be significant in 35 channels in ER9, distributed in ISI, SUS, PEM and LSC subsystems. Among all the 35 channels, 22 of them does not have a range up to its 11th harmonic, 625.25 Hz.
Keith indicated in his slog entry that a DAQ malfunction is suspected to be the ultimate source of this, and these findings suggest it's in an EX electronics crate.
Here are a few interesting observations:
The 9th harmonic at 511.56Hz is the weakest in most channels, sometimes buried in noises.
In some PEM channels, there are missing lines at low frequency (< 200 Hz) and high frequency (> 500 Hz).
In PEM and ISI channels, there seems to be another comb structure with a frequency slightly larger than 56.8406Hz coexists. That one is usually most significant at its third harmonics.
Generally, the structure is more clearly seen in LSC, SUS and ISI channels
Sample plots from each subsystem:
Figure 1: We can see the 56.8406Hz comb structure exists with its 9th harmonic weakest in ISI.
Figure 2: PEM channels have more noises and, as in ISI channels, the other comb structure coexists.
Figure 3: SUS channels do not have enough range up its 11th harmonic but we can see its first and second harmonic here.
Figure 4: There is only one channel from LSC but the structure is very clear.
All plots and a list of channels are attached in the zip file.
Just to be clear. Here are the channels that the coherence tool is finding the comb. This is what is supporting Keith's assumption that the problems could be in an EX electronics crate. Channels List: H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ_data H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ_data
I chased Comb 23 (type K) in Keith’s post, shown in Keith's original post as
This comb has an offset of 153.3545 Hz and a fundamental frequency of 0.0884Hz. It starts at 153.3545 Hz and goes up to its 11th harmonic, 154.3272 Hz. As is listed in Keith's txt file:
Comb 23 (type K, offset=153.354500): Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz) Bar (logarithmic) K 153.3545 ( 0 X 0.0884) 1.844961e-19 **** K 153.4429 ( 1 X 0.0884) 1.949756e-19 **** K 153.5314 ( 2 X 0.0884) 2.165192e-19 ***** K 153.6198 ( 3 X 0.0884) 2.181833e-19 ***** K 153.7082 ( 4 X 0.0884) 2.457840e-19 ***** K 153.7966 ( 5 X 0.0884) 2.243089e-19 ***** K 153.8851 ( 6 X 0.0884) 2.709562e-19 ***** K 153.9735 ( 7 X 0.0884) 2.499596e-19 ***** K 154.0619 ( 8 X 0.0884) 2.562208e-19 ***** K 154.1503 ( 9 X 0.0884) 1.945817e-19 **** K 154.2388 ( 10 X 0.0884) 1.951777e-19 **** K 154.3272 ( 11 X 0.0884) 1.703353e-19 ****
I found the comb structure in two channels of ISI subsystem.
Figure 1 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13RZ_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:
https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314371
Figure 2 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13Z_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:
https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314374
In the plots of both channels, we can see a comb structure stands out at the positions of harmonics. We are wondering about the reason for this:
Why these seismic isolation channels?
This post is supplementary to the first post about coherence analysis result for the 56.8406Hz Comb at
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28619
The first post is addressing the 56.8406Hz comb found in Keith's original post (marked as D comb):
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28364
Information about this comb from the txt file in Keith's post:
Comb 35 (type D, offset=0.000000): Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz) Bar (logarithmic) D 56.8406 ( 1 X 56.8406) 3.968800e-17 *********** D 113.6811 ( 2 X 56.8406) 1.773964e-17 ********** D 170.5217 ( 3 X 56.8406) 7.121580e-18 ********* D 227.3622 ( 4 X 56.8406) 3.232935e-18 ******** D 284.2028 ( 5 X 56.8406) 1.166094e-18 ******* D 341.0433 ( 6 X 56.8406) 1.007273e-18 ******* D 397.8839 ( 7 X 56.8406) 5.962059e-19 ****** D 454.7245 ( 8 X 56.8406) 3.752194e-19 ***** D 511.5650 ( 9 X 56.8406) 2.577108e-19 ***** D 568.4056 ( 10 X 56.8406) 1.964393e-19 **** D 625.2461 ( 11 X 56.8406) 1.891774e-19 **** --------------------------------------------------------------
Besides the 35 channels found in the original post, 7 more channels are found to be relevant to the 56.8406Hz Comb. Two new subsystems, ASC and HPI are involved.
These new channels are:
H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
So updated channel list is (42 channels in total):
H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RX_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RY_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RZ_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ
Attached images are sample plots from ASC and HPI subsystem.
Full results are also attached.
Here are the coherence search results of all the single lines in ER9 data, which are listed in Keith’s post. I found 29 of all the 198 lines on the list and posted the results on my homepage here:
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~duo.tao/ER9_single_lines/index.html