Since replacing the crystal chiller flow sensor did not fix the problem with the laser tripping out,
we replaced the water manifold located under the PSL table. Attached are two traces from when the
chiller tripped out. Since the power meter circuit tripped before the front end circuit, this suggested
that the problem really was with the power meter flow sensor rather than the chiller (see attached
plots).
The pressure regulators on the manifold were adjusted to give a front end flow rate of 1.7 lpm,
the power meter circuit 1.5 lpm and the laser heads 0.6 lpm as indicated by the Beckhoff PC. Note
that the flow for head 4 is different at 0.5 lpm, although head 4 has always been a bit odd of late.
- 4 bar for the MOPA circuit
- 4.46 bar for the power meter circuit
- 4.35 bar foe the laser heads circuit
It is possible that there is a slow leak at the bottom of the power meter flow sensor. We will be
monitoring the crystal chiller water level over the next few days to see if indeed there is a leak.
Laser restarted. Things seem to be okay for now, at least.
JeffB/Jason/Peter
Checked the HEPI L4C WD saturations per FAMIS task #7046. All green, all counts were zero.
Ran power and network cabling for the new ITM cameras that are to be installed. Cables were pulled from the X and Y manifold spool into the beer garden. This required dressing cables around BSC1, BSC2, and BSC3.
JimW, JeffK, HughR
Around 1900 utc, the pressure dropped and the servo drive went to max; from afar, this looks like a fluid level trip. Jeff went to the end station and found that the front panel red light was still on indicating it was not a fluid level trip. Opening the controller panel to access the VFD revealed the OU3 error indicator. Last aLog with this problem found with quick search was at EndY July 2015. Maybe it is a warmer weather problem. Brought control servo output to 0, reset VFD to clear the error and then brought things back under servo control, around 2200utc. Jeff noted the fluid levels were same as before--no fluid problems.
Pictures from the investigation attached. First: The front of the fluid level indicator of the HEPI pump fluid reservoir. Second: The "iso" view of the fluid level indicator, showing that the fluid level with the pump servo OFF (or "stopped" or tripped like it was when we found itp) is at 9 2/16 inches, which matches the level in early June when the level was last checked without the pump running. Third: a look inside the Variable Frequency Driver (VFD) enclosure taking a picture of the VPD while in its "OU3" (for Output Voltage 3) error. The "reset" button to which Hugh refers is in the bottom left corner.
According to the manual OU3 is an "over voltage error while at constant speed". - see attached page.
Other VFDs on site have similar issues which we think is due to spikes on the 3 phase supply.
Richard can tell you more.
TITLE: 07/26 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
INCOMING OPERATOR: Travis
SHIFT SUMMARY: Down most of the shift for maintenance
LOG:
MarcP/HughR
DeIsolated the platform to investigate the concerns on the Coil Driver. Running an sine excitation into the H2 OUTF, things looked fine until the I_INMON reached about 50-60 counts; this occurred with an excitation of 2500 counts. At that point, the I_INMON reversed direction and went very large (340cts.) Looking at the actual platform motion though, this was not happening to the Actuator. This is similar to what we observed in the second attachment of 28621. It never was observed to do anything crazier than that though such as suddenly driving the platform off to tripping.
Next step was to disconnect the output from the coil driver and confirming that what we saw on the monitors was what was going out, even though looking at the response of the platform, it was moving in a nice sinusoidal pattern and not abruptly reversing when the current hit 60 counts. About that time is when Marc noticed that the -15V led was not illuminated on the coil driver chassis. He pulled the coil driver and found the SG7915 Voltage regulator was producing -2V rather than -15V.
Pulled coil driver S1103341 and replaced with S1600116. This unit had the hardware watchdog power supply enable circuitry so that enabling voltage was patched over from ITMY.
The ISI reisolated first attempt. Took the platform back to Isolated Damped and again ran the sine (0.05Hz) until the I_INMON was surpassing ~75cts. No clipping/flipping/scaling seen on the I_INMON signal. Attached is this after picture, sadly the ugly before picture may be lost as we had frame writer issues during the morning and afternoon.
WP 6017 FRS 5948
Jenne, Chris Whittle
I verified that the ITM oplevs will most likely be insufficient for taking charge measurements; we will need to rely on DARM. See the attached spectra, made with an excitation at various frequencies and amplitude 130k cts. Dotted reference lines were set with no excitations, solid lines show the response to the excitation in the bottom axes.
I also noticed that some of the MEDM outputs for L3 of the ITMs are incorrect. Two of the USER MODEL DAC OUTPUT (H1:FEC-30_DAC_OUTPUT_3_6, H1:FEC-30_DAC_OUTPUT_3_7) read 0 when a voltage should be present. The ANALOG SWITCH lights and quadrant VMON channels are left-right flipped relative to the control switches (i.e. flipping UL shows a reading in UR). I also had to remind myself that I should always use the longitudinal channel (rather than pitch or yaw, which will attempt a differential excitation and give zero output) when exciting ITMs.
(Chandra, Gerardo)
Removed and replaced the AIP for BSC8, no issues encountered.
An aux cart was used to pump down the system from 17:10 to 21:50 utc.
AIP system is running on its own, and maintaining pressure (system back to nominal).
Lowered LLCV from 21% to 20% after CP3 Dewar fill. Exhaust pressure was spotted at 1.4 psi.
In response to Keita's alog (here) I changed the whitening gain and number of active filters on the ITMx, ITMy, and ETMx optical levers. They are now set as outlined in the 2nd table in Keita's alog. I also enabled the corresponding de-whitening filters in the oplev filter medm screens (ITMy and ETMx only, as these were the only ones that had additional whitening filters enabled) and accepted the changes in SDF.
I took spectra of each segement of the QPD for each TM oplev, both before and after the de-whitening filters (channels labeled IN1 are before de-whitening, channels labeled OUT are after de-whitening) as well as spectra of the pitch and yaw signals of each oplev.. To my knowledge, ETMx and ETMy look as they are supposed to. On the other had, the ITMx and ITMy QPD spectra do not look right to me. When I took the spectra there were ongoing investigations into ITMx ISI coil driver issues and ITM charge measurements (ie, the optics were moving); also, the oplev lasers for both ITMx and ITMy oplevs are unstabilized lasers, sitting on the LVEA floor. All of these could be causing issues with the measurements; they should be re-taken once things have quieted down and see if there are differences. If there are no differences, I fear we may have made things worse for the ITMs. There also appears to be a comb in all of the ITMy spectra. I think this is caused by the laser glitching; as soon as I have a stabilized laser ready for install this laser is getting replaced.
This completes WP #6020.
ITMX looks good to me. All quadrants look similar to each other and the PIT plot looks better than before (e.g. https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/uploads/28615_20160725101947_Screenshotfrom2016-07-2510%3A01%3A12.png).
ITMY looks OK-ish to me except at high kHz for segment 1 and 3, which need to be investigated further. But the thing is that ITMY used to be without any whitening gain and filter that there was no way this kind of oddness could have been revealed before. See the attached plot of the current ITMY oplev signals with the pink line showing the old noise floor, and compare with the above mentioned old plot.
Had bagged entire RGA assembly previously -> Removed 1.5" O-ring valve (redundant valve in series with 1.5" UHV valve) and installed turbo in its place. Backed turbo with leak detector. Opened 1.5" UHV valve to combine detector with RGA volume. Helium line penetrated bag at top while O2 sensor (with internal pump) penetrated bag at bottom. No flow meter on helium but set to "significant" flow rate. O2% fell from 20% to 1.6% over 10 minutes. No leaks detected with helium baseline holding @ 1.2 x 10-9 torr*l/sec or so throughout the helium application -> Once convinced that no leaks were present, I closed the 1.5" UHV valve and "cracked" the isolation valve of the external calibrated helium leak and observed the expected response; thus demonstrating that the mass spec. was sampling the test port during testing. Installed 5 of 6 heat tapes on RGA assembly in preparation of baking it out at the next available opportunity. Note to self: The isolation valves for the Nitrogen and Krypton calibration gases were closed during this testing so the two "factory" double-sided mini-conflat joints did not get tested. Also, I noticed after shutting down and decoupling the leak detector etc. that the factory 2.75" CFF joint between the RGA analyzer and its protective nipple showed a crescent shaped gap. All of the joints tested in this excercise (12 or 13?) where ones that I bolted and are "metal-to-metal" and won't change with with baking. This sole gappy joint could leak following a thermo cycle so I will "cinch" it up and leak check it along with the two double sided joints that I missed before baking.
J. Kissel We're still struggling to get past the Parametric Instability Phoenix (e.g. LHO aLOG 28600), so we haven't had much IFO time / patience to debug ESD bias sign flipping. As such, the charge, effective bias voltage, and actuation strength continue to change slowly. Again (see last week's report in LHO aLOG 28523), ETMX is charging about twice as fast as it has between the prior two flips, so its accumulated charge will begin to get excessive sooner than ETMY. I'll keep pushing for a debug of the bias flipping, but we've got higher priorities with the IFO stability at the moment, and the change from charge is not out of control or ridiculous. Yet.
J. Kissel, J. Betzwieser, B. Storr WP #6023 Joe and Bria have discovered a small bug in the future monitoring of the IFO response parameter time-dependence regarding the use of the sub-function atan2 (see LLO aLOG 27214). As such I've svn up'd the affected library part, /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/models/CAL_LINE_MONITOR_MASTER.mdl and recompiled, restarted, and restored the model to the OBSERVE SDF file (which I'd reconciled before restarting).
The flow sensor in the crystal chiller was replaced. The water filters in the chiller room were also replaced as per work permit ... 6008 Power cycled both the diode and crystal chillers. Rebooted the Beckhoff computer. Right away an increase in the flow rate of the crystal chiller was observed. The error message also disappeared. A plot of the before/after flow rates is attached. The exception delay in the crystal chiller was set back to 000 s. JeffB/Jason/Peter
I also happened to notice that the pump current for head 3 is now correctly reporting 50.2 A on the MEDM screen as opposed to 100+ A yesterday (and possibly a number of days before).
The sensor replacement does not appear to have fixed the problem.
Executive summary: * Good news - as expected, the 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither is gone (at least at this sensitivity level) * Bad news - low-frequency 1-Hz combs remain, and some new low-frequency combs & lines have appeared Some details:
I analyzed the 56.8406Hz comb with coherence tool and here are the results. The same structure is found to be significant in 35 channels in ER9, distributed in ISI, SUS, PEM and LSC subsystems. Among all the 35 channels, 22 of them does not have a range up to its 11th harmonic, 625.25 Hz.
Keith indicated in his slog entry that a DAQ malfunction is suspected to be the ultimate source of this, and these findings suggest it's in an EX electronics crate.
Here are a few interesting observations:
The 9th harmonic at 511.56Hz is the weakest in most channels, sometimes buried in noises.
In some PEM channels, there are missing lines at low frequency (< 200 Hz) and high frequency (> 500 Hz).
In PEM and ISI channels, there seems to be another comb structure with a frequency slightly larger than 56.8406Hz coexists. That one is usually most significant at its third harmonics.
Generally, the structure is more clearly seen in LSC, SUS and ISI channels
Sample plots from each subsystem:
Figure 1: We can see the 56.8406Hz comb structure exists with its 9th harmonic weakest in ISI.
Figure 2: PEM channels have more noises and, as in ISI channels, the other comb structure coexists.
Figure 3: SUS channels do not have enough range up its 11th harmonic but we can see its first and second harmonic here.
Figure 4: There is only one channel from LSC but the structure is very clear.
All plots and a list of channels are attached in the zip file.
Just to be clear. Here are the channels that the coherence tool is finding the comb. This is what is supporting Keith's assumption that the problems could be in an EX electronics crate. Channels List: H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ_data H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ_data H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ_data H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ_data
I chased Comb 23 (type K) in Keith’s post, shown in Keith's original post as
This comb has an offset of 153.3545 Hz and a fundamental frequency of 0.0884Hz. It starts at 153.3545 Hz and goes up to its 11th harmonic, 154.3272 Hz. As is listed in Keith's txt file:
Comb 23 (type K, offset=153.354500): Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz) Bar (logarithmic) K 153.3545 ( 0 X 0.0884) 1.844961e-19 **** K 153.4429 ( 1 X 0.0884) 1.949756e-19 **** K 153.5314 ( 2 X 0.0884) 2.165192e-19 ***** K 153.6198 ( 3 X 0.0884) 2.181833e-19 ***** K 153.7082 ( 4 X 0.0884) 2.457840e-19 ***** K 153.7966 ( 5 X 0.0884) 2.243089e-19 ***** K 153.8851 ( 6 X 0.0884) 2.709562e-19 ***** K 153.9735 ( 7 X 0.0884) 2.499596e-19 ***** K 154.0619 ( 8 X 0.0884) 2.562208e-19 ***** K 154.1503 ( 9 X 0.0884) 1.945817e-19 **** K 154.2388 ( 10 X 0.0884) 1.951777e-19 **** K 154.3272 ( 11 X 0.0884) 1.703353e-19 ****
I found the comb structure in two channels of ISI subsystem.
Figure 1 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13RZ_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:
https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314371
Figure 2 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13Z_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:
https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314374
In the plots of both channels, we can see a comb structure stands out at the positions of harmonics. We are wondering about the reason for this:
Why these seismic isolation channels?
This post is supplementary to the first post about coherence analysis result for the 56.8406Hz Comb at
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28619
The first post is addressing the 56.8406Hz comb found in Keith's original post (marked as D comb):
https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28364
Information about this comb from the txt file in Keith's post:
Comb 35 (type D, offset=0.000000): Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz) Bar (logarithmic) D 56.8406 ( 1 X 56.8406) 3.968800e-17 *********** D 113.6811 ( 2 X 56.8406) 1.773964e-17 ********** D 170.5217 ( 3 X 56.8406) 7.121580e-18 ********* D 227.3622 ( 4 X 56.8406) 3.232935e-18 ******** D 284.2028 ( 5 X 56.8406) 1.166094e-18 ******* D 341.0433 ( 6 X 56.8406) 1.007273e-18 ******* D 397.8839 ( 7 X 56.8406) 5.962059e-19 ****** D 454.7245 ( 8 X 56.8406) 3.752194e-19 ***** D 511.5650 ( 9 X 56.8406) 2.577108e-19 ***** D 568.4056 ( 10 X 56.8406) 1.964393e-19 **** D 625.2461 ( 11 X 56.8406) 1.891774e-19 **** --------------------------------------------------------------
Besides the 35 channels found in the original post, 7 more channels are found to be relevant to the 56.8406Hz Comb. Two new subsystems, ASC and HPI are involved.
These new channels are:
H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
So updated channel list is (42 channels in total):
H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RX_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RY_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RZ_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ
Attached images are sample plots from ASC and HPI subsystem.
Full results are also attached.
Here are the coherence search results of all the single lines in ER9 data, which are listed in Keith’s post. I found 29 of all the 198 lines on the list and posted the results on my homepage here:
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~duo.tao/ER9_single_lines/index.html