Displaying reports 58221-58240 of 86095.Go to page Start 2908 2909 2910 2911 2912 2913 2914 2915 2916 End
Reports until 16:28, Tuesday 26 July 2016
H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:28, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28652)
PSL water manifold replaced
Since replacing the crystal chiller flow sensor did not fix the problem with the laser tripping out,
we replaced the water manifold located under the PSL table.  Attached are two traces from when the
chiller tripped out.  Since the power meter circuit tripped before the front end circuit, this suggested
that the problem really was with the power meter flow sensor rather than the chiller (see attached
plots).

    The pressure regulators on the manifold were adjusted to give a front end flow rate of 1.7 lpm,
the power meter circuit 1.5 lpm and the laser heads 0.6 lpm as indicated by the Beckhoff PC.  Note
that the flow for head 4 is different at 0.5 lpm, although head 4 has always been a bit odd of late.
 - 4 bar for the MOPA circuit
 - 4.46 bar for the power meter circuit
 - 4.35 bar foe the laser heads circuit

    It is possible that there is a slow leak at the bottom of the power meter flow sensor.  We will be
monitoring the crystal chiller water level over the next few days to see if indeed there is a leak.

    Laser restarted.  Things seem to be okay for now, at least.


JeffB/Jason/Peter
Images attached to this report
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:20, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28655)
OPS: reset of HEPI L4C Accumulated WD Counters Tuesday 07/26/16
   Checked the HEPI L4C WD saturations per FAMIS task #7046. All green, all counts were zero.  
H1 General
filiberto.clara@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:16, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28650)
ITM Camera Installation

Ran power and network cabling for the new ITM cameras that are to be installed. Cables were pulled from the X and Y manifold spool into the beer garden. This required dressing cables around BSC1, BSC2, and BSC3.

H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:09, Tuesday 26 July 2016 - last comment - 21:38, Tuesday 26 July 2016(28653)
EndX HEPI Pump Servo Shutdown with OverVoltage Error

JimW, JeffK, HughR

Around 1900 utc, the pressure dropped and the servo drive went to max; from afar, this looks like a fluid level trip.  Jeff went to the end station and found that the front panel red light was still on indicating it was not a fluid level trip.  Opening the controller panel to access the VFD revealed the OU3 error indicator.  Last aLog with this problem found with quick search was at EndY July 2015.  Maybe it is a warmer weather problem.  Brought control servo output to 0, reset VFD to clear the error and then brought things back under servo control, around 2200utc.  Jeff noted the fluid levels were same as before--no fluid problems.

Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 16:25, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28654)
Pictures from the investigation attached.

First: The front of the fluid level indicator of the HEPI pump fluid reservoir.

Second: The "iso" view of the fluid level indicator, showing that the fluid level with the pump servo OFF (or "stopped" or tripped like it was when we found itp) is at 9 2/16 inches, which matches the level in early June when the level was last checked without the pump running.

Third: a look inside the Variable Frequency Driver (VFD) enclosure taking a picture of the VPD while in its "OU3" (for Output Voltage 3) error. The "reset" button to which Hugh refers is in the bottom left corner. 
Images attached to this comment
john.worden@LIGO.ORG - 21:38, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28665)

According to the manual OU3 is an "over voltage error while at constant speed". - see attached page.

Other VFDs on site have similar issues which we think is due to spikes on the 3 phase supply. 

Richard can tell you more.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:59, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28651)
Shift Summary 7/26

TITLE: 07/26 Day Shift: 15:00-23:00 UTC (08:00-16:00 PST), all times posted in UTC
STATE of H1: Commissioning
INCOMING OPERATOR: Travis
SHIFT SUMMARY:  Down most of the shift for maintenance
LOG:

15:00 PSL team replacing PSL chiller
15:15 Gerardo to BSC8 to prep for ion pump replacement
15:15 JoeD to LVEA to check lift batteries
15:30 Bubba to LVEA to check 3IFO
15:30 Kyle to EY to run leak detector
15:30 Jason to LVEA to change ITM oplev settings
16:00 Jason to EY to swap out oplev laser
16:00 Christina to EX
16:00 Hugh doing measurement on ITMX
16:00 ChrisW doing charge measurement on ITMY
16:00 ChrisS to EY
18:00 JoeD to LVEA
18:00 PeterK to PSL 
18:15 JohnW Koji to Ymid
21:15 JeffK to EX
20:30 Bubba to EX/EY for fan maintenance
 
 
 
15:00 PSL team replacing PSL chiller
15:15 Gerardo to BSC8 to prep for ion pump replacement
15:15 JoeD to LVEA to check lift batteries
15:30 Bubba to LVEA to check 3IFO
15:30 Kyle to EY to run leak detector
15:30 Jason to LVEA to change ITM oplev settings
16:00 Jason to EY to swap out oplev laser
16:00 Christina to EX
16:00 Hugh doing measurement on ITMX
16:00 ChrisW doing charge measurement on ITMY
16:00 ChrisS to EY
18:00 JoeD to LVEA
18:00 PeterK to PSL 
18:15 JohnW Koji to Ymid
21:15 JeffK to EX
20:30 Bubba to EX/EY for fan maintenance
 
 
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:56, Tuesday 26 July 2016 - last comment - 16:25, Tuesday 26 July 2016(28649)
ITMX Coil DRiver Board Problem Investigation

MarcP/HughR

DeIsolated the platform to investigate the concerns on the Coil Driver.  Running an sine excitation into the H2 OUTF, things looked fine until the I_INMON reached about 50-60 counts; this occurred with an excitation of 2500 counts.  At that point, the I_INMON reversed direction and went very large (340cts.)  Looking at the actual platform motion though, this was not happening to the Actuator.  This is similar to what we observed in the second attachment of 28621. It never was observed to do anything crazier than that though such as suddenly driving the platform off to tripping.

Next step was to disconnect the output from the coil driver and confirming that what we saw on the monitors was what was going out, even though looking at the response of the platform, it was moving in a nice sinusoidal pattern and not abruptly reversing when the current hit 60 counts.  About that time is when Marc noticed that the -15V led was not illuminated on the coil driver chassis.  He pulled the coil driver and found the SG7915 Voltage regulator was producing -2V rather than -15V.

Pulled coil driver S1103341 and replaced with S1600116.  This unit had the hardware watchdog power supply enable circuitry so that enabling voltage was patched over from ITMY.

The ISI reisolated first attempt.  Took the platform back to Isolated Damped and again ran the sine (0.05Hz) until the I_INMON was surpassing ~75cts.  No clipping/flipping/scaling seen on the I_INMON signal.  Attached is this after picture, sadly the ugly before picture may be lost as we had frame writer issues during the morning and afternoon.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - 16:25, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28656)

WP 6017  FRS 5948

H1 AOS (SUS)
chris.whittle@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:41, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28646)
ITM oplev measurements

Jenne, Chris Whittle

I verified that the ITM oplevs will most likely be insufficient for taking charge measurements; we will need to rely on DARM. See the attached spectra, made with an excitation at various frequencies and amplitude 130k cts. Dotted reference lines were set with no excitations, solid lines show the response to the excitation in the bottom axes.

I also noticed that some of the MEDM outputs for L3 of the ITMs are incorrect. Two of the USER MODEL DAC OUTPUT (H1:FEC-30_DAC_OUTPUT_3_6, H1:FEC-30_DAC_OUTPUT_3_7) read 0 when a voltage should be present. The ANALOG SWITCH lights and quadrant VMON channels are left-right flipped relative to the control switches (i.e. flipping UL shows a reading in UR). I also had to remind myself that I should always use the longitudinal channel (rather than pitch or yaw, which will attempt a differential excitation and give zero output) when exciting ITMs.

Images attached to this report
LHO VE (VE)
gerardo.moreno@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:21, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28648)
BSC8 Annulus Ion Pump

(Chandra, Gerardo)

Removed and replaced the AIP for BSC8, no issues encountered.

An aux cart was used to pump down the system from 17:10 to 21:50 utc.

AIP system is running on its own, and maintaining pressure (system back to nominal).

LHO VE
chandra.romel@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:49, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28647)
CP3 LLCV decrease
Lowered LLCV from 21% to 20% after CP3 Dewar fill. Exhaust pressure was spotted at 1.4 psi.
H1 AOS (SUS)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:37, Tuesday 26 July 2016 - last comment - 18:28, Tuesday 26 July 2016(28645)
Optical Lever Whitening Gain and Filter Changes (WP 6020)

In response to Keita's alog (here) I changed the whitening gain and number of active filters on the ITMx, ITMy, and ETMx optical levers.  They are now set as outlined in the 2nd table in Keita's alog.  I also enabled the corresponding de-whitening filters in the oplev filter medm screens (ITMy and ETMx only, as these were the only ones that had additional whitening filters enabled) and accepted the changes in SDF.

I took spectra of each segement of the QPD for each TM oplev, both before and after the de-whitening filters (channels labeled IN1 are before de-whitening, channels labeled OUT are after de-whitening) as well as spectra of the pitch and yaw signals of each oplev..  To my knowledge, ETMx and ETMy look as they are supposed to.  On the other had, the ITMx and ITMy QPD spectra do not look right to me.  When I took the spectra there were ongoing investigations into ITMx ISI coil driver issues and ITM charge measurements (ie, the optics were moving); also, the oplev lasers for both ITMx and ITMy oplevs are unstabilized lasers, sitting on the LVEA floor.  All of these could be causing issues with the measurements; they should be re-taken once things have quieted down and see if there are differences.  If there are no differences, I fear we may have made things worse for the ITMs.  There also appears to be a comb in all of the ITMy spectra.  I think this is caused by the laser glitching; as soon as I have a stabilized laser ready for install this laser is getting replaced.

This completes WP #6020.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 18:28, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28661)

ITMX looks good to me. All quadrants look similar to each other and the PIT plot looks better than before (e.g. https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/uploads/28615_20160725101947_Screenshotfrom2016-07-2510%3A01%3A12.png).

ITMY looks OK-ish to me except at high kHz for segment 1 and 3, which need to be investigated further. But the thing is that ITMY used to be without any whitening gain and filter that there was no way this kind of oddness could have been revealed before.  See the attached plot of the current ITMY oplev signals with the pink line showing the old noise floor, and compare with the above mentioned old plot.

Images attached to this comment
LHO VE
kyle.ryan@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:18, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28644)
Leak tested Y-end RGA
Had bagged entire RGA assembly previously -> Removed 1.5" O-ring valve (redundant valve in series with 1.5" UHV valve) and installed turbo in its place.  Backed turbo with leak detector.  Opened 1.5" UHV valve to combine detector with RGA volume.  Helium line penetrated bag at top while O2 sensor (with internal pump) penetrated bag at bottom.  No flow meter on helium but set to "significant" flow rate.  O2% fell from 20% to 1.6% over 10 minutes.  No leaks detected with helium baseline holding @ 1.2 x 10-9 torr*l/sec or so throughout the helium application -> Once convinced that no leaks were present, I closed the 1.5" UHV valve and "cracked" the isolation valve of the external calibrated helium leak and observed the expected response; thus demonstrating that the mass spec. was sampling the test port during testing.  

Installed 5 of 6 heat tapes on RGA assembly in preparation of baking it out at the next available opportunity.

Note to self: The isolation valves for the Nitrogen and Krypton calibration gases were closed during this testing so the two "factory" double-sided mini-conflat joints did not get tested.  Also, I noticed after shutting down and decoupling the leak detector etc. that the factory 2.75" CFF joint between the RGA analyzer and its protective nipple showed a crescent shaped gap.  All of the joints tested in this excercise (12 or 13?) where ones that I bolted and are "metal-to-metal" and won't change with with baking.  This sole gappy joint could leak following a thermo cycle so I will "cinch" it up and leak check it along with the two double sided joints that I missed before baking.
H1 SUS
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:03, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28643)
Charge Measurement Update; Increasing As Last Week; Still Need to Commission Bias Flippnig
J. Kissel

We're still struggling to get past the Parametric Instability Phoenix (e.g. LHO aLOG 28600), so we haven't had much IFO time / patience to debug ESD bias sign flipping. As such, the charge, effective bias voltage, and actuation strength continue to change slowly. Again (see last week's report in LHO aLOG 28523), ETMX is charging about twice as fast as it has between the prior two flips, so its accumulated charge will begin to get excessive sooner than ETMY.

I'll keep pushing for a debug of the bias flipping, but we've got higher priorities with the IFO stability at the moment, and the change from charge is not out of control or ridiculous. Yet. 
Images attached to this report
H1 AOS (SUS)
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:27, Tuesday 26 July 2016 - last comment - 09:43, Friday 26 August 2016(28641)
ETMy Optical Lever Laser Swapped (WP 6013)

I swapped the oplev laser for the ETMy optical lever in order to address the problem noted by Sheila here.  The laser will need 4-6 hours to come to thermal equillibrium.

The SN of the new laser is 130-1.  This completes WP #6013.

Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 09:43, Friday 26 August 2016 (29328)

Following up on this laser swap, the problem does not appear to be solved; see attached trend of ETMy oplev pitch & yaw.  Will try power cycling the oplev AA chassis during the next Tuesday maintenance window.

Images attached to this comment
H1 CAL
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:09, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28640)
Minor Bug fix to CAL-CS Front-End Model
J. Kissel, J. Betzwieser, B. Storr
WP #6023

Joe and Bria have discovered a small bug in the future monitoring of the IFO response parameter time-dependence regarding the use of the sub-function atan2 (see LLO aLOG 27214). As such I've svn up'd the affected library part, 
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/cal/common/models/CAL_LINE_MONITOR_MASTER.mdl
and recompiled, restarted, and restored the model to the OBSERVE SDF file (which I'd reconciled before restarting).

H1 PSL (PSL)
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:03, Tuesday 26 July 2016 - last comment - 10:06, Tuesday 26 July 2016(28637)
Flow sensor and filter replacement
The flow sensor in the crystal chiller was replaced.  The water filters in the chiller room were also
replaced as per work permit ...
6008

    Power cycled both the diode and crystal chillers.  Rebooted the Beckhoff computer.  Right away an
increase in the flow rate of the crystal chiller was observed.  The error message also disappeared.
A plot of the before/after flow rates is attached.

   The exception delay in the crystal chiller was set back to 000 s.



JeffB/Jason/Peter
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 09:05, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28638)
I also happened to notice that the pump current for head 3 is now correctly reporting
50.2 A on the MEDM screen as opposed to 100+ A yesterday (and possibly a number of days
before).
peter.king@LIGO.ORG - 10:06, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28639)
The sensor replacement does not appear to have fixed the problem.
H1 DetChar
keith.riles@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:20, Tuesday 12 July 2016 - last comment - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016(28364)
Narrow lines in ER9 H1 DARM
Executive summary: 

* Good news - as expected, the 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither is gone (at least at this sensitivity level)
* Bad news - low-frequency 1-Hz combs remain, and some new low-frequency combs & lines have appeared 

Some details:
  • I initially looked at 15 hours of 30-minute FScan DELTAL_EXTERNAL SFTs (30 SFTs) generated during ER9 and was aghast at how bad the low-frequency spectrum looked, with a pervasive 0.485308-Hz comb ranging up to its 446th harmonic at 216.4 Hz, but when I exclude the three hours of SFTs when the 2-second ALS- glitches were present, things don't look quite so bad (see figure 1 for a sample without removal and figure 4 with removal). I dewhiten according to the new 6-pole / 6-zero, 0.3 / 30 Hz algorithm.
  • The infamous 16-Hz comb due to the OMC length dither tracked down and killed here is gone (at least at this sensitivity level and these SFT statistics). As a result the high-frequency band (up to 2 kHz) is remarkably smooth with only violin modes and sporadic isolated artifacts.
  • The 1-Hz comb with 0.5-Hz offset remains pervasive, but other prior 1-Hz or near-1-Hz combs with different offsets (e.g., 0.25 Hz) are not strong.
  • On the other hand, there is a new near-1-Hz comb (0.996798-Hz spacing) visible to its 204th harmonic at ~203.3 Hz.
  • There is also a new near-2-Hz comb (1.999951-Hz spacing) visible on approximate odd-integer-Hz frequencies, starting from ~9 Hz and visible up to ~175 Hz. This is likely the same 2-Hz comb reported in May by Bryn Pearlstone (which Ansel Neunzert kindly reminded me about today).
  • There is a "new" 56.8406-Hz comb visible to its 11th harmonic at ~625.25 Hz, which in hindsight I can see was buried in the O1 spectrum (I overlooked the pattern and indicated the teeth as isolated lines). This time the pattern was strong enough to jump out at me and to jog my memory that this comb was seen in H2 1-arm data in 2012 in both the arm feedback channel and a quiet sensor-noise-dominated OSEM channel. This seemed to indicate a DAQ system problem at the time. I can see from O1 NoEMi line lists that this comb is pervasive in ISI, SUS and PEM channels at the corner station and both end stations.
  • The old "K" comb-on-comb (0.088425-Hz fine comb attached to teeth of a coarse 76.3235-Hz comb) has more 11 more fine teeth visible on the lowest-frequency coarse-tooth comb.
  • The old calibration line at 35.9 Hz has been moved to 35.3 Hz. The new excitation lines at 33.7 and 34.7 Hz are easily visible, but not as strong as the primary calibration lines. I found these changes documented here.
  • There are sporadic new isolated lines here and there (indicated in line list - see below)
  • There is a "crab-killer" broad bump centered at about 58.6 Hz which degrades sensitivity in the Crab Pulsar band of interest (~59.3 Hz). On the other hand, the whole noise floor is elevated w.r.t. O1, anyway. So it may be premature to worry about the bump.
Figure 1 - spectrum for 50-100 Hz when the 3-hour 2-second-glitches stretch is included (~0.5 Hz lines marked with 'h' for 'half') Figure 2 - 0-2000 Hz (removing 3-hour bad stretch from here on) Figure 3 - 20-50 Hz sub-band Figure 4 - 50-100 Hz sub-band Figure 5 - 100-200 Hz sub-band Figure 6 - 1300-1400 Hz sub-band (illustration of how clean the high-frequency band is) Also attached are a larger set of zipped sub-band spectra and a lines list (excluding the bad 3-hour stretch). Note that because the statistics here are two orders of magnitude smaller than used for the full O1 run report, I am not yet removing lines seen then that may yet re-emerge with more accumulated post-O1 data. So many of the line labels in these figures are buried in the noise fuzz for now. Line label codes in figures: b - Bounce mode (quad suspension) r - Roll mode (quad suspension) Q - Quad violin mode and harmonics B - Beam splitter violin mode and harmonics C - Calibration lines M - Power mains (60 HZ) O - 1-Hz comb (0.5-Hz offset) o - weaker 1-Hz and near-1-Hz combs (various offsets, including zero) H - 99.9989-Hz comb J - 31.4127 and 31.4149-Hz combs K - 0.088425-Hz comb-on-comb t - 1.999951-Hz, 2.07412-Hz and 2.07423-Hz combs D - 56.8406-Hz comb x - single line (not all singlets in the vicinity of quad violin modes are marked, given the known upconversion)
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 12:04, Monday 25 July 2016 (28619)DetChar

I analyzed the 56.8406Hz comb with coherence tool and here are the results. The same structure is found to be significant in 35 channels in ER9, distributed in ISI, SUS, PEM and LSC subsystems. Among all the 35 channels, 22 of them does not have a range up to its 11th harmonic, 625.25 Hz.

 

Keith indicated in his slog entry that a DAQ malfunction is suspected to be the ultimate source of this, and these findings suggest it's in an EX electronics crate.

 

Here are a few interesting observations:

  • The 9th harmonic at 511.56Hz is the weakest in most channels, sometimes buried in noises.

  • In some PEM channels, there are missing lines at low frequency (< 200 Hz) and high frequency (> 500 Hz).

  • In PEM and ISI channels, there seems to be another comb structure with a frequency slightly larger than 56.8406Hz coexists. That one is usually most significant at its third harmonics.

  • Generally, the structure is more clearly seen in LSC, SUS and ISI channels

 

Sample plots from each subsystem:

Figure 1: We can see the 56.8406Hz comb structure exists with its 9th harmonic weakest in ISI.

Figure 2: PEM channels have more noises and, as in ISI channels, the other comb structure coexists.

Figure 3: SUS channels do not have enough range up its 11th harmonic but we can see its first and second harmonic here.

Figure 4: There is only one channel from LSC but the structure is very clear.

 

All plots and a list of channels are attached in the zip file.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
nelson.christensen@LIGO.ORG - 11:14, Tuesday 26 July 2016 (28642)DetChar, PEM
Just to be clear. Here are the channels that the coherence tool is finding the comb. This is what is supporting Keith's assumption that the problems could be in an EX electronics crate.

Channels List:
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ_data

H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ_data
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ_data
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ_data
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ_data
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 18:55, Thursday 28 July 2016 (28717)DetChar

I chased Comb 23 (type K) in Keith’s post, shown in Keith's original post as

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/uploads/28364_20160712211751_CombPlots_H1-CAL-DELTAL-EXT_ER9-Cleaned_100_200_Hz.png

 

This comb has an offset of 153.3545 Hz and a fundamental frequency of 0.0884Hz. It starts at 153.3545 Hz and goes up to its 11th harmonic, 154.3272 Hz. As is listed in Keith's txt file:

Comb 23 (type K, offset=153.354500):
Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
K  153.3545 (   0  X    0.0884) 1.844961e-19   ****
K  153.4429 (   1  X    0.0884) 1.949756e-19   ****
K  153.5314 (   2  X    0.0884) 2.165192e-19   *****
K  153.6198 (   3  X    0.0884) 2.181833e-19   *****
K  153.7082 (   4  X    0.0884) 2.457840e-19   *****
K  153.7966 (   5  X    0.0884) 2.243089e-19   *****
K  153.8851 (   6  X    0.0884) 2.709562e-19   *****
K  153.9735 (   7  X    0.0884) 2.499596e-19   *****
K  154.0619 (   8  X    0.0884) 2.562208e-19   *****
K  154.1503 (   9  X    0.0884) 1.945817e-19   ****
K  154.2388 (  10  X    0.0884) 1.951777e-19   ****
K  154.3272 (  11  X    0.0884) 1.703353e-19   ****

 

I found the comb structure in two channels of ISI subsystem.

Figure 1 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13RZ_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314371

Figure 2 shows the plot of channel H1:ISI-HAM6_BLND_GS13Z_IN1_DQ. Descriptions of this channel can be found here:

https://cis.ligo.org/channel/314374

In the plots of both channels, we can see a comb structure stands out at the positions of harmonics. We are wondering about the reason for this:

 

Why these seismic isolation channels?


Images attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 00:15, Friday 29 July 2016 (28721)

This post is supplementary to the first post about coherence analysis result for the 56.8406Hz Comb at

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28619

The first post is addressing the 56.8406Hz comb found in Keith's original post (marked as D comb):

https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=28364

Information about this comb from the txt file in Keith's post:

Comb 35 (type D, offset=0.000000):
  Frequency (offset + harmonic x fund freq) Ampl (m/rtHz)  Bar (logarithmic)
D   56.8406 (   1  X   56.8406) 3.968800e-17   ***********
D  113.6811 (   2  X   56.8406) 1.773964e-17   **********
D  170.5217 (   3  X   56.8406) 7.121580e-18   *********
D  227.3622 (   4  X   56.8406) 3.232935e-18   ********
D  284.2028 (   5  X   56.8406) 1.166094e-18   *******
D  341.0433 (   6  X   56.8406) 1.007273e-18   *******
D  397.8839 (   7  X   56.8406) 5.962059e-19   ******
D  454.7245 (   8  X   56.8406) 3.752194e-19   *****
D  511.5650 (   9  X   56.8406) 2.577108e-19   *****
D  568.4056 (  10  X   56.8406) 1.964393e-19   ****
D  625.2461 (  11  X   56.8406) 1.891774e-19   ****
--------------------------------------------------------------

Besides the 35 channels found in the original post, 7 more channels are found to be relevant to the 56.8406Hz Comb. Two new subsystems, ASC and HPI are involved.

These new channels are:

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ

H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ

H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ

H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ

So updated channel list is (42 channels in total):

H1:ASC-X_TR_A_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:ASC-X_TR_B_NSUM_OUT_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Y_IN1_DQ
H1:HPI-ETMX_BLND_L4C_Z_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RX_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RY_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_RZ_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_X_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Y_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST1_BLND_Z_T240_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RX_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RY_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_RZ_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_X_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Y_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-ETMX_ST2_BLND_Z_GS13_CUR_IN1_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:ISI-GND_STS_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:LSC-X_TR_A_LF_OUT_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Y_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_BSC9_ETMX_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_ISCTEX_TRANS_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_ACC_VEA_FLOOR_Z_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_1_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_2_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MAINSMON_EBAY_3_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_MINUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_MIC_VEA_PLUSX_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_X_DQ
H1:PEM-EX_SEIS_VEA_FLOOR_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L1_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_L_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_P_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_L2_WIT_Y_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_L_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_P_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_T_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_V_IN1_DQ
H1:SUS-ETMX_M0_DAMP_Y_IN1_DQ
 

Attached images are sample plots from ASC and HPI subsystem.

Full results are also attached.

Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
duo.tao@LIGO.ORG - 08:01, Thursday 01 September 2016 (29431)

Coherence Search Results of All the Single Lines in ER9 Data

Here are the coherence search results of all the single lines in ER9 data, which are listed in Keith’s post. I found 29 of all the 198 lines on the list and posted the results on my homepage here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~duo.tao/ER9_single_lines/index.html

Displaying reports 58221-58240 of 86095.Go to page Start 2908 2909 2910 2911 2912 2913 2914 2915 2916 End