Displaying reports 61521-61540 of 85627.Go to page Start 3073 3074 3075 3076 3077 3078 3079 3080 3081 End
Reports until 11:57, Thursday 07 January 2016
LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:57, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24745)
DAY Ops Summary

TITLE:  1/7 DAY Shift:  16:00-00:00UTC (08:00-04:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

(Corey from 16-20UTC & Bartlett from 20 - 00UTC)

STATE of H1:  

Incoming Operator:  Cheryl

Support:  

Quick Summary:

Calibration work continues.

Shift Activities:

H1 INJ (INJ)
cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:55, Thursday 07 January 2016 - last comment - 14:13, Tuesday 12 January 2016(24747)
HWInjReport 1132963217 - 1136155727

HWInjReport 1132963217 - 1136155727

Performed a run spanning the time period from 1132963217 (Dec 01 2015 00:00:00 UTC) to 1136155727 (Jan 06 2016 22:48:30 UTC)

Parameters

The following parameters were used for this run:

Scheduled Injections

During this time period, 12 scheduled injections were found to have occurred

Only 1 injection was found to not occur:

Network and IFO Injections

Of the occurring scheduled injections, only two occurred as single-IFO injections:

All other scheduled injections occurred as H1-L1 coincident injections. The only UNSCHEDULED injections were 5 CALRESETs at L1 and 1 CALRESET at H1.

Discussion of Anomalies

The CALRESET injections have the same pattern of occurring with only certain paired combinations of the frame flags indicated by HWInjReport, as seen previously. However, all of the occurring scheduled injections have the anomaly of not occurring in the CAL-INJ channel and not having the TRANSIENT bit set to “off” to indicate the presence of a transient injection. They do occur, consistently, in the ODC-MASTER channel for HOFT, RAW, and RDS frames and the GDS-CALIB channel for HOFT frames.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - 11:01, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24748)

Minor correction made to report.  There were, in fact, 2 single-IFO injections that occurred, both in L1.  I missed the second one due to an eyeball error.

cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - 14:42, Monday 11 January 2016 (24874)

As reported by Chris B. in https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=24282, the two single-IFO injections were the result of H1 losing lock.

cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - 14:13, Tuesday 12 January 2016 (24901)

The absence of occurrence of the injections in the CAL-INJ channel turns out to not be an anomaly but the result of a deliberate change to using the new CAL-PINJX_ODC_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ channel to record the information that was originally in CAL-INJ_ODC_CHANNEL_OUT_DQ.  Currently, HWInjReport does not check the CAL-PINJX channel, however, it should not be difficult to add checking on this channel.

H1 PSL (PSL)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:06, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24744)
PSL Crystal Chiller Topped Off

Per Operator Shift Checksheet activity for Thursday Task, I topped off the Crystal Chiller by adding 175mL of water.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:35, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24743)
Transition to DAY Shift Update

TITLE:  1/7 DAY Shift:  16:00-00:00UTC (08:00-04:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

STATE of H1:   OBSERVING (but taken out at 8am for calib)

Outgoing Operator:  Jim

Quick Summary:

As I walked in, H1 was in Observing, but Jeff was staging for his first Calibration measurements, which promptly started at 16:00UTC.  Also heard from Joe B. at LLO and how they are also starting as well.  

At the moment both interferometers are up and running for calibration work.  In the LVEA the useism continues to be high at about 0.75um/s; virtually no winds.

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:51, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24742)
Shift Summary

1/7 Owl Shift 08:00-16:00UTC

State of H1: Observing 80Mpc

Shift Summary: Quiet shift. Locked at 9:00UTC, not much else to report

H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:56, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24741)
Mid Shift Update

Quiet shift so far. Locked about 9:00 UTC, been in Observe since. Wind is low, microseism is high, range is ~80MPC. POP bleed off seems to have been resolved after the work earlier today. 

H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:12, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24738)
Ops Eve Summary:

00:00-08:00UTC, 16:00-23:59PT

State of H1: unlocked

Fellow: Sheila

Incoming Ops: JimW

Shift Summary: 

Lock Loss:

H1 ISC
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:00, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24736)
old offsets for ASC X/Y A/B PIT/YAW

Offsets were set back to previous values.

Previous/current values are:

H1 ISC (OpsInfo)
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:41, Wednesday 06 January 2016 - last comment - 12:42, Thursday 07 January 2016(24733)
ASC woes

[Jenne, Kiwamu, Sheila, JeffK]

Today, the interferometer decided that it didn't want to go from ASC_PART2 to ASC_PART3 without some hand-tuning each lock.  However, after some investigation, it's still not entirely clear what the right thing to do is :(

The things we were playing with were the offsets in the CSOFT and DSOFT pitch filter banks (can only be tweaked *after* the loops are on, since there's an integrator always on in each of those filter banks) and the transmon qpds' ASC-[x,y]_TR_[a,b]_[pit,yaw]_OFFSETs.  These things are kind of the same, but you need to adjust the transmon offsets if you want to do some adjusting before the loops are closed, and you need to adjust the CSOFT and DSOFT offsets if you want to do some adjusting after the loops are closed.

We've had locks where we didn't survive if we didn't re-zero the qpd offsets before going to part3, and we've had locks where we didn't survive part3 if we didn't adjust the CSOFT and DSOFT offsets.  But, we've also had locks where the opposite was true.

Anyhow, at this point, I think our advice is to try going through the guardian like normal (no by-hand offsetting), and if that fails one or more times, call a commissioner (it's me for now, so please call).  For example, the last lock, I re-set the qpd offsets during asc part 2, but forgot to engage the CSOFT and DSOFT offsets, and we seemed to be just fine.  So, it's not totally clear yet what the final prescription should be.

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 00:35, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24737)

Tonight we had one OK lock with the offsets as Jenne aloged above, which we lost because of an EQ (see Cheryl's shift summary).  On relocking without changing the offsets or doing anything special, we lost lock due to the CSOFT pitch instability that has plauged us when we have changed the TMS QPD offsets in the past. (There was a small EQ that arrived on site shortly after this lockloss, but clearly we lost lock because of the pit instability before it arrived). After this, Cheryl and I let the IFO lock and engage ASC with the offsets that Jenne had found this afternoon, then once the soft loops were closed very slowly reverted to the old offsets (see Cheryl's alog) at 2 Watts. Our recycling gain was around 41 when we started, and although it dropped as we reverted the offsets it returned to 41-42 once they were all reverted.  We powered up slowly and the recycling gain stayed above 40.  After about 20 minutes I thought that things seemed better than they have in several days, so I suggested we offload the full lock ASC.  Sadly this broke the lock. 

Since this situation is very similar to what happened Dec 3rd -4th, I re-ran the script I used then to look at build ups (23959), for the past 10 days.  The results are very similar, the drop off in the POP DC trace is very similar to the drop off in the arm transmissions (ratio of arm transmissions to POP DC is shown in the middle panel, and is changing by at worst 1% while the powers drop by nearly 15%. )

One explanation we considered in December was that the OMC was becoming misaligned, causing the DARM offset to change.  The second attachment shows the OMC ASC control signals and the QPDs, which are out of loop.  You can see that they move around even in locks where the recycling gain is stable and don't seem to be any worse in the last few days, so it seems like this is not our problem.  

 

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 01:06, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24740)

Jim has just relocked with a recycling gain of 41, which has been stable for nearly 20 minutes, so this is looking more promising.  One thing that we did is edit lscparams so that the guardian will go to 10 Watts in the increase power state instead of the normal set point of 23 W.  

Until this is reverted the steps to follow for power up are:

1) request INCREASE_POWER (it is important to change the PSL power only in this state, this state automatically takes care of gain scalings for you).

wait until the power reaches approximately 10 watts, and the recycling gain seems stable.  We have been waiting a few minutes here to make sure it stays stable, that should not normally be necessary.

2) open the PSL rotation stage medm screen (from site map under IOO on the top right hand side, Rotation Stage).

3) type 23 in the requested power dialog box and hit go to power

4) only once the rotation stage has finished moving is it safe to leave the INCREASE_POWER state.

kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 09:22, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24746)

For the record, I give you another similar example that Nutsinee and I had experienced back in October (alog 22575 and comments). At that time, we conluded that it was due to subopitimal alignment in TMSY.

thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - 12:42, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24750)

Opened FRS ticket

Fault Report 4186 - Trouble advancing past Guardian state ENGAGE_ASC_PART2

(This was done as "for-real" practice with R. Oram)

H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:24, Wednesday 06 January 2016 (24735)
GRB alert at 01:37:28UTC

GRB alert arrived at 01:37:28UTC, and it's currently 2:22UTC.

H1 was locked before the GRB arrived, and is still locked.

We are about 10 minutes from completing the stand-down time.

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:01, Wednesday 06 January 2016 (24731)
OPS Day Shift Summary

Title: 1/6 Shift 16:00-24:00 UTC (8:00-16:00 PST).  All times in UTC.

State of H1: Locking/Commissioning

Shift Summary: We have been struggling to acquire lock all day due to issues with ASC loops.  Commissioners are working on it and hopefully we are nearing success.  Microseism is trending up and is currently at 0.6 um/s.  Wind is calm.

Incoming operator: Cheryl

Activity log:

19:00 Kyle and Gerardo to Mid Y

19:54 Kyle and Gerardo back

23:34 Kyle to Mid Y

23:54 Kyle back

H1 INJ (INJ)
cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:10, Wednesday 06 January 2016 (24730)
HWInjReport 1132272017 - 1133039434

HWInjReport 1132272017 - 1133039434

Performed a run spanning the time period from 1132272017 (Nov 23 2015 00:00:00 UTC) to 1133039434 (Dec 01 2015 21:10:17 UTC)

Parameters

The following parameters were used for this run:

Scheduled Injections

There were no injections scheduled to occur within this time period.

Network and IFO Injections

Only a single CAL-INJ reset in L1 was found to occur within this time period

This was, of course, UNSCHEDULED.

Discussion of Anomalies

No anomalies of interest were found.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 INJ (INJ)
cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:55, Wednesday 06 January 2016 (24729)
HWInjReport 1132084817 - 1132350679

HWInjReport 1132084817 - 1132350679

Performed a run spanning the time period from 1132084817 (Nov 20 2015 20:00:00 UTC) to 1132350679 (Nov 23 2015 21:51:02 UTC)

Parameters

The following parameters were used for this run:

Scheduled Injections

There were no injections found to be scheduled during this time period.

Network and IFO Injections

There were no injections found to occur during this time period.

Discussion of Anomalies

No anomalies found during this time period.

Non-image files attached to this report
H1 CAL (SUS)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:45, Tuesday 05 January 2016 - last comment - 10:27, Thursday 07 January 2016(24716)
EY SUS Coil Driver Measurements Complete
J. Kissel

In efforts to finally nail down the mysterious "zero" around 50 [Hz] in the UIM (see LHO aLOG 24296), I've measured the TOP, UIM, and PUM driver using three different measurement configurations. The hope is that, with this "matrix" of differences, we can find out what's going on with the UIM to see if its something specific to the driver, or specific to the OSEM chain upstream of the driver. From what I've seen watching the measurements go by on the SR785, both the TOP and PUM stage show similar zero-like behavior as the UIM, though the TOP mass has a pole-like behavior above the zero and eventually rolls off. Both the PUM and the UIM look as though they are rolling up to "infinity" by 10 [kHz], without even a phase shift indicating their might be a pole "soon" in frequency.  More detailed analysis and plots to come.

The data has been committed to the repo here:
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PostO1/H1/Measurements/Electronics/
EYPUMDriver/2016-01-05/TFSR785*.txt
EYTOPDriver/2016-01-05/TFSR785*.txt
EYUIMDriver/2016-01-05/TFSR785*.txt
where the key to each driver's measurement set is in the log files,
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PostO1/H1/Measurements/Electronics/
EYPUMDriver/2016-01-05/2016-01-05_EYTOP_Measurement_log.txt
EYTOPDriver/2016-01-05/2016-01-05_EYUIM_Measurement_log.txt
EYUIMDriver/2016-01-05/2016-01-05_EYPUM_Measurement_log.txt

I also attach a white board sketch that indicates each of the measurement configurations.
   (0) [Not shown] The "reference" measurement is identical to the reference setup shown in page 2 of the 2nd attachment in 18518, which is divided out of every transfer function to get rid of the response of the differential driver.
   (1) This is measuring the response of the coil driver as it is typically measured on the bench by CDS. It uses a differential to single-ended receiver and the 40 [ohm] internal load (as I only found out later, the documentation on this box, D1000931 leaves something to be desired), so the response differs from configuration (2) only by a scale factor of 2.
   (2) This is measuring the response of the coil driver as is typically done in the field when the OSEM and/or satellite amplifier is not available. The box (D1100278) is, as far as the coil chain is concerned, only a two 20 [ohm] (for a total of 40 [Ohm]) resistor load.
   (3) This is the "real life" scenario, where we measure the response of the driver with the full SatAmp and OSEM included as a load on the output of the driver. It is in this configuration is where the magic happens, apparently.
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 11:43, Wednesday 06 January 2016 (24725)
Since the IFO has decided to give up on Calibration Week, I've put together some .graffle diagrams of what I show in the whiteboard picture above such that a future user and/or LLO can more clearly replicate my results, if need be (or they don't trust what Evan G's is about to post).

Also note for future me, the source code for these diagrams lives in
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PostO1/H1/Measurements/Electronics/EYTOPDriver/2016-01-05/
CoilDriverChassisSetup_BenchTestSetup.graffle
CoilDriverChassisSetup_DummyOsemChain.graffle
CoilDriverChassisSetup_RealOsemChain.graffle
Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.goetz@LIGO.ORG - 10:27, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24734)

Summary:
I plotted the results of Jeff's measurements for the H1 End Y driver electronics for the top, UIM, and PUM masses. All show odd behavior at high frequencies that we cannot model as an ideal inductor.

  1. The top mass BOSEMs have an odd behavior, approximately f^(1/4) dependence, but can't be fit to a simple pole-zero pair, nor more complicated 2 pole/1 zero, or 2-complex-pole/1 zero models.
  2. The UIM BOSEMs show an f^(3/4) dependence and also have 180-degree phase flip with respect to the top mass BOSEMs.
  3. The PUM AOSEMs in state 1 and 3 show an odd high frequency behavior something like f^(3/4) dependence, especially with the phase turn-over at 60 degrees and we cannot fit a 2-complex-pole/1 zero to this.
  4. AOSEMs in state 2 and 4 have the complicated aquire electronics that change the Bode plots but we ignore these issues as they are expected

Details:
For each measurement of a given mass' driver electronics (TOP, UIM, or PUM), I divided the measured BOSEM (for TOP/UIM) or AOSEM (for PUM) transfer functions (normalized) by the corresponding transfer function for when there is a dummy 40 ohm resistor terminating the output of the drive electronics (also normalized). In addition to plotting the results of the measurements, I also investigated the high frequency behavior. Nominally, we expect to observe the inductance of the BOSEMs or AOSEMs as a simple zero--the high frequency dependence goes as f. Instead, we observe different dependences for the BOSEMs of the top and UIM masses and the AOSEMs of the UIM (state 1 and 3). We attempted to fit by hand some zero-pole models to these Bode plots but were unsuccessful to replicate the high frequency dependence.

  1. For the top mass, it appears like there is a pole-zero pair, but we are unable to replicate the transfer function behavior with simple pole-zero or more complicated 2 pole/1 zero and 2-complex-pole/1 zero. In the 1 kHz region, the frequency dependence is approx. f^(1/4). For all top mass BOSEMs, in both states, we observe the same issue.
  2. For the UIM, It definitely appears that the BOSEM frequency dependence is f^(3/4) from the measurements above 1 kHz for all UIM BOSEMs and all states.
  3. The PUM AOSEMs in states 1 and 3 show an interesting ~f^(3/4) dependence and phase turn over at 60 degrees. We were unable to fit this to zero-pole pair.
  4. State 2 and 4 in the PUM AOSEMs show the complicated acquire electronics that we do not attept to model here.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:08, Thursday 03 December 2015 - last comment - 00:23, Thursday 07 January 2016(23941)
Transmitted IFO powers dropping

[Sheila, Jenne, Travis, JeffK, EvanH]

The transmitted powers through the IFO are dropping on a several-hour timescale, and we don't know why. It looks like this was also happening at the end of yesterday's 31 hour lock.  (POP_LF is shown for the last day or so in the attached plot.)  These are the only 2 locks in the last 10 days that have this trend - for all the others the powers stay nice and steady.

The power into the interferomter as measured by both IMC_Trans and IM4_Trans is steady, so it's not anything from the PSL or IMC. 

We have looked at all the alignment and length control signals that we can think of, as well as the witness channels on the bottoms of the optics, and we aren't seeing anything that jumps out at us as a cause of this power drop.

Intriguingly, the REFL power is dropping as well as the transmitted powers, so perhaps we're losing our mode matching throughout the lock?  Sheila found that the TCS CO2 power is different after Tuesday maintenence this week, although it's not changing throughout these locks.

Anyhow, we're not sure what is wrong, so we're not sure what we would tweak if we could, so we're leaving the IFO alone.  But, I suspect that once POP_LF gets down near 15,000 counts we'll lose this lock. 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 13:17, Friday 04 December 2015 (23959)

This morning Keita, Evan and I had another look at these two locks where the POP power dropped.  

The first attached plots show various power build ups, normalized to their medians durring this 2.5 day stretch of data.  The lines for POPDC, TRX, and TRY are almost on top of each other, and drop by about 10% in the 5-10 hours before the lockloss.  The lower plot shows the arm transmissions normalized by the POP power, which is mostly stable but increases by about 10% at the end of the locks.  From this we can conclude that the problem doesn't seem to be either a mode mismatch or misalignment of the arm cavities, but something happening in the vertex.  

In both cases the refl power drops sooner than the POP and arm powers, and it drops by almost 20%.  AS90 and AS_C are fairly stable.  

One possiblity is that somehow the OMC was becoming misaligned, the DARM offset was increasing to compensate for this.  The second plot shows the OMC ASC control signals (normailzed to their medians), and the OMC QPDs (detrended) durring this time. Although there does seem to be small ez=xcursions in these signals at the end of the locks, its not verry conclusive.  The difference of X and Y tidal control signals in the bottom panel might have shown us a change in DARM offset, but it seems like the tidal signal is large compared to anything that is corellated with the power drops.

Images attached to this comment
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 00:23, Thursday 07 January 2016 (24739)

Note:  there was a typo in the script used above, in the first plot lower subplot I was not plotting the ratios that I though I was.  Conclusions are not changed. 

H1 INJ (INJ)
cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:01, Friday 20 November 2015 - last comment - 16:02, Wednesday 06 January 2016(23603)
HWInjReport 1129593617 - 1131828544

HWInjReport 1129593617 - 1131828544

Performed a run spanning the time period from 1129593617 (Oct 23 2015 00:00:00 UTC) to 1131828544 (Nov 17 2015 20:48:47 UTC)

Parameters

The following parameters were used for this run:

Scheduled Injections

Only two injections were found to be scheduled during this period:

However, neither of these injections were found to actually occur within the examined time period.

Network and IFO Injections

There were no normal injections that occurred within the examined period. There were a number CAL-INJ resets, all single-IFO with the same curious pattern to the frame flags as denoted in the immediately prior HWInj report (https://alog.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=23485). There was a single-IFO burst injection in H1

BURST 1129673117.000 (H1)

with the only anomaly being that it is UNSCHEDULED. There was a single UNKNOWN injection in L1

UNKNOWN 1129673117.000 (L1)

This injection was confirmed to occur only within the CAL-INJ channel of RAW frames with the TRANSIENT bit indicating an injection but none of the specific injection-type bits, CBC, BURST, DETCHAR, or STOCHASTIC, indicating an injection. It was confirmed to not occur in ODC HOFT, ODC RDS, ODC RAW, or GDS HOFT frames.

Discussion of Anomalies

It is interesting that the single-IFO injections BURST 1129673117.000 (H1) and UNKNOWN 1129673117.000 (L1) are found to occur at the exact same time but within different IFOs. Even further, the fact the BURST injection in H1 is perfectly normal, other than being UNSCHEDULED, while the UNKNOWN injection in L1, in addition to being UNSCHEDULED, is inconsistent. HWInjReport currently does not check the HW bit or the CW bit in the CAL-INJ channel for RAW frames for the presence of injections; however, upon examining these bits directly, it was found that while the HW bit indicated an injection, along with the TRANSIENT bit, the CW bit did not indicate an injection (my first thought was that this may be a CW injection only occurring in L1). This means this was a truly UNKNOWN, UNSCHEDULED injection occurring only with L1. Given both injections occur at the exact same time and the L1 injection is a truly UNKNOWN type (practically a ghost injection, by the bits), it is likely this was intended to be a normal network injection; however either user-error or a catastrophic software error corrupted the proper setting of the bits.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - 14:21, Monday 23 November 2015 (23670)

There was an additional UNKNOWN injection that occurred at 1131397646 in both H1 and L1 (as noted by Peter Shawhan) with a signature similar to the one reported here.  However, for some reason HWInjReport missed it.  I will have to investigate why HWInjReport missed that particular injection, but, unlike the last session of bug-fixing, I am not going to cease production of reports.  It is my estimation that HWInjReport is currently operating with reasonable confidence to find and report most true anomalies.  If reporting errors or omissions are found, then those errors should be correctable and a new report on the relevant time period can be generated.

christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 13:54, Monday 14 December 2015 (24206)
I didn't see any follow-up on this but I did some checks:

The injection at 1129673117 is the stochastic hardware injection that Joe and Chris did. This was out of science mode.

The injection at 1131397646 should be the injection in the schedule file from line: 1131397639 1 1.0 coherentbbh0_1126259455_

This CBC injection was not logged properly for the searches because tinj was setting CAL-INJ_TINJ_TYPE instead of CAL-PINJX_TINJ_TYPE. So I would guess that was the problem that you're seeing here. The issues have since been fixed though.
cregg.yancey@LIGO.ORG - 16:02, Wednesday 06 January 2016 (24732)INJ

Now that I finally have my diagnostic tool working (it's a ripped-down version of HWInjReport called HWInjCheck that simply returns raw output from FrBitmaskTransitions to allow rapid verification of anomalies found in HWInjReport), I re-examined the missing UNKNOWN injection at 1131397646.  Firstly, HWInjReport can only identify injections as UNKNOWN if they occur in the CAL-INJ.  This is because, as far as I can determine, only the CAL-INJ channel has an independent excitation bit that indicates whether a transient injection has occurred, regardless of type (as well as an independent HW bit indicating the occurrence of an injection of any type).  This does not seem to be true for ODC-MASTER and GDS-CALIB channels.  So, in CAL-INJ, if the TRANSIENT bit is "off" (indicating the presence of a transient injection) but the CBC, BURST, DETCHAR, and STOCHASTIC bits, which indicate the type of injection, are "on", then it is clear we have an UNKNOWN type transient injection occurring.  However, for ODC-MASTER and GDS-CALIB, if the type bits are not "off", there is nothing to indicate excitation of a transient injection with an unspecified type.  If 1131397646 occurs with an unspecified type in the ODC-MASTER or GDS-CALIB channel but not in the CAL-INJ channel, then HWInjReport will completely miss the injection as it won't show up at all in any of the bits and channels that HWInjReport checks.

Using HWInjCheck to check the output from FrBitmaskTransitions, I have not, yet, found any indication of the occurrence of 1131397646, that is, there is no indication of excitation in the excitation bits.  I will check again more carefully, but, at this point, it does seem HWInjReport is working properly; this is an expected missing injection.  To be clear, there may still have actually been an excitation, there just doesn't seem to be any record of it in the bits and channels that HWInjReport checks.

Displaying reports 61521-61540 of 85627.Go to page Start 3073 3074 3075 3076 3077 3078 3079 3080 3081 End