Displaying reports 62041-62060 of 84531.Go to page Start 3099 3100 3101 3102 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 End
Reports until 08:06, Wednesday 04 November 2015
LHO FMCS
bubba.gateley@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:06, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23095)
Quarterly Supply Fan Lubrication
Apologizes for the late entry.

Yesterday all site supply fans were lubricated per the quarterly schedule.

We also took the maintenance period opportunity to change some extremely dirty air filters which are located in the supply fan areas.
H1 AOS
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:53, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23094)
Shift Summary
TITLE: 11/03 Owl: 8:00-16:00 UTC 
STATE Of H1: Observing @ ~75 MPc.
SHIFT SUMMARY: 
SUPPORT:
ACTIVITY LOG:

H1 was locked when I arrived, RF45 was acting up occasionally, though. Otherwise quiet shift.

15:00 UTC Started receiving CS temp notifications, Bubba notified/working on it.
H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:51, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23093)
Temps low in corner station

This morning about 15:00 UTC, I got a couple notifications that temps were low in the LVEA. I let Bubba know, but he was already working on it. I haven't heard any notifications since, Bubba said he will keep an eye on it.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:07, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23092)
Ops Eve End Shift Summary
TITLE: 11/03 [EVE Shift]: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC
STATE Of H1: Observing @ ~75 MPc.
SHIFT SUMMARY: Initial lock impeded by bounce and roll modes. Lost lock during earthquake in East Timor. Seismic stayed abnormally high for almost 2 hours. Recovered and back to observing.
SUPPORT: Evan, Jenne
INCOMING OPERATOR: Jim

ACTIVITY LOG:

00:13 UTC Kyle and Gerardo back from X28 (near end X)
01:25 UTC Towing truck through gate
04:36 UTC Nutsinee leaving, driving up bridge before heading out
04:40 UTC Jenne driving to end stations to turn card readers on
04:49 UTC Turned power off to speaker in control room
05:06 UTC Jenne back
05:45 UTC Restarted video2, Ops overview frozen
H1 General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:06, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23091)
Observing
Seismic took about 2 hours to ring down to the point that we could relock. The 0.03 - 0.1 Hz seismic band is between ~ .02 and .1 um/s. The microseism is between ~ .1 and .2 um/s. The winds are around 10 mph.

Violin mode damping for ITMX and ITMY is off.

ISI blends are at Quite_90.

Jenne turned the card readers on at end X, end Y and the LVEA.

Range is around 78 MPc.
H1 SYS
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:09, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23088)
Card readers back on

[Jenne, Miquel, Patrick]

The card readers providing access to the VEAs were turned off during maintenence today.  Since we're unlocked due to an earthquake anyway, they have now been turned back on (EX, EY and vertex).

H1 General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:22, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23087)
Lock loss
SUS I_T_M_Y saturating (Nov 4 04:14:41 UTC)
DRMI Unlocked (Nov 4 04:14:41 UTC)
Intention Bit: Commissioning (Nov 4 04:14:41 UTC)
ISC_LOCK state: DOWN (Nov 4 04:14:48 UTC)

From USGS:
6.3 77km WNW of Dili, East Timor 2015-11-04 03:44:15 UTC 14.3 km deep

Spike to ~ .3 um/s in 0.03 - 0.1 Hz seismic band
LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:05, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23086)
Ops Eve Mid Shift Summary
Have remained in observing. No changes to report.
H1 OpsInfo (ISC)
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:55, Tuesday 03 November 2015 - last comment - 20:33, Friday 13 November 2015(23085)
ITM violin mode damping temporarily turned off

I have turned off the violin mode damping filters for IX and IY by zeroing their gains. Patrick accepted these into SDF so that we can go to observing.

This is meant to be temporary, i.e., for this one lock only.

The next time the interferometer comes into lock, the Guardian will turn on the normal violin mode damping settings. These settings will appear as SDF diffs (two on IX, and six on IY). These should be accepted into SDF.

 

We do not expect these modes to ring up during the course of the lock. However, if the mode height on the control room DARM spectrum around 500 Hz rises above 10−16 m/rtHz, the damping should be turned back on:

  1. Make sure the ramp times for the damping filter modules are at least a few seconds (currently they seem to be set to 10 s).
  2. The filters should already be configured to provide the right damping phase, so changing the filters should not be necessary.
  3. Start typing in gain settings. Refer to the values listed below. If the violin mode amplitude is much much higher than usual (e.g., it's off the scale on the control room DARM spectrum), it is wise to start with a small gain (e.g, gain of ±1) in order to make sure the suspension drive does not saturate. Then you can increase the gain in several steps, until the nominal setting is achieved.

A screenshot of the nominal IY damping settings is attached (I didn't take one for IX).

ITMX:

ITMY

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 11:14, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23102)

Thanks to Jeff, Patrick, and Jim for babysitting this.

The second lock (after the earthquake) lasted about 10 hours. Strangely, the ITM first harmonics (which range from 500 to 505 Hz) do not all seem to ring down.

Non-image files attached to this comment
borja.sorazu@LIGO.ORG - 19:29, Wednesday 11 November 2015 (23332)

An analysis of this data to measure Q of the fundamental modes for ITMX and ITMY violin modes is reported in 23331. The few modes that show an actual ringdown have a Q of about 0.3e9.

borja.sorazu@LIGO.ORG - 20:33, Friday 13 November 2015 (23384)

An analysis of this data to measure Q of the 2nd harmonics for ITMX and ITMY violin modes is reported in 23383.

H1 AOS
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:20, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23082)
Maintenance: ACB diodes

There was some suspicion that the whitening gain for some of the ACB PDs became bad, but I have confirmed on the floor that the gain setting on the MEDM screen is reflected correctly in the diode amplifier box (D1301017) over the entire gain range for all baffle PDs for IX, IY, EX and EY.

I've followed the test procedure E1400003.

H1 General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:11, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23080)
Observing
Violin mode damping for ITMX and ITMY is off. The damping gains of 0 were accepted in SDF (see attached screenshots). Evan wants to see how long they take to ring down without damping.

ISI blends are at Quite_90.
Images attached to this report
H1 AOS
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:35, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23078)
OpLev Output Configuration Switch Survey

During today's maintenance period I surveyed the switch configuration of the Output Configuration Switch (OCS) for each SUS oplev (WP #5588).  The OCS is the small board with 4 banks of 8 switches each that attaches to the front of each oplev whitening chassis; it allows us to control the amount of whitening gain and filtering we apply to the oplev QPD signal.  The results of this survey have been gathered and posted to the DCC here: T1500556.  This document needs to be updated anytime the switch configuration of these OCSs changes; if anyone makes any changes to an OCS please let me know, via email or alog (preferably both), what you did so I can keep us up to date with the current OCS configuration.

LHO General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:21, Tuesday 03 November 2015 - last comment - 18:43, Tuesday 03 November 2015(23077)
Ops Eve Beginning Shift Summary
TITLE: 11/03 [EVE Shift]: 00:00-08:00 UTC (16:00-00:00 PDT), all times posted in UTC
STATE Of H1: Lock acquisition
OUTGOING OPERATOR: Jeff
QUICK SUMMARY:
Lights appear off in the LVEA, PSL enclosure, end X, end Y and mid X. I can not tell from the camera if they are off at mid Y.
Winds are less than 10 mph. Appear to be increasing.
ISI blends are at Quite_90.
Earthquake seismic band is between 0.01 and 0.02 um/s. Microseism is between 0.1 and 0.3 um/s.

Jeff has been having trouble with ITMY bounce and roll modes. Has been stopping at REDUCE_CARM_OFFSET_MORE to allow Jenne and Evan to investigate.
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 18:43, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23084)

The roll modes have been conquered.  When they were too high, the DHARD loops become unstable and we lose lock.  We stopped at REDUCE_CARM_OFFSET_MORE, which was the highest state that we could sit at without losing the lock.

ITMY's roll mode was the worst offender according to the monitor screen, so we only worked on damping that mode.  We used the usual filter settings (which are always left in the correct state) and the usual negative sign for the gain.  The usual gain that guardian leaves the ITMY roll mode damping is -40, but I was using larger gains to get the mode to go down faster.  Once the roll modes were all around the "okay" level on the monitor screen, we let guardian continue the locking sequence. 

We were concerned at one point that guardian had frozen on us, but it turns out that we were just being fooled.  It looked like guardian was not finishing the DC_READOUT.main state, and not even starting the DC_READOUT.run state.  However, it was all fine.  I think I have been fooled by this before, but as a reminder (to myself especially), if an EPICS value is not going to change, guardian will not log that it tried to write the value.  So, the last few steps of the main sequence were to write some gain values that were not going to change, which is why it looked like it was just stuck.  Also, there was nothing in the run part of the state that was going to cause any log messages, so it didn't look like anything had happened, even though we were already getting the "return true" at the end of the state.  In the end, we just requested a higher state, and guardian moved on as usual. 

H1 CDS (CAL)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:02, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23076)
GraceDB notification system (ext_alert) is now automatically restarted if it stops

following Keith's LLO install, I have configured monit on h1fescript0 to automatically start the GraceDB notification system on system reboot,and to restart it if it stops running. Here are the details:

created a new exttrig account local to h1fescript0. Currently this has the standard controls password.

In the exttrig home directory, install script run_ext_alert.sh

Install a start/stop script in /etc/init.d/ext_alert

Install monit and mailx on the machine

Configure monit via /etc/monit/monitrc and /etc/monit/conf.d/monit_ext_alert

I changed the ownership of the cert files from user controls to user exttrig

Tested by killing the ext_alert process and checking monit restarted it

I have removed the obsolete startup instructions in the [[ExternalAlertNotification]] wiki page

This closes FRS3415.

H1 PSL (PSL)
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:35, Tuesday 03 November 2015 - last comment - 18:14, Tuesday 03 November 2015(23073)
ISS 2nd loop health check

I have spent about an hour today checking some basic behavior of the ISS 2nd loop servo circuits. I did the following two measurements.

  1. Offset measurement
  2. Measurement of operating point as a function of the input power

No crazy thing was found in today's test. Our plan is that whenever we have issues with the ISS 2nd loop in some future, we will repeat the same type of measurements with an aim to identify what is changing.

Offset measurement

I checked how the reference signal propagates to the servo signal output by changing the reference signal. The measurement was done with the IMC intentionally unlocked. Therefore there was no light incident on the ISS PD array in HAM2. The result is shown in the first attachment. An important quantity to note here is the signal output value when zero reference voltage was requested. It was 2.76 V. Also note that zero output signal can be obtained when the reference signal is requested to be between 5 and 10 mV. This does not sound crazy to me. According to the resultant plot, the linearity seems also fine. Additionally I checked the reference monitor as well which also showed a good linearity. Later, I did a coarse version of the same test with the full power incident on IMC (~22 W). Even though the actual RIN was too high to make a precise measurement, the linear coefficient between the reference and output signals seemed consistent with what I have measurement with no light. I also attach the raw data in txt format.

Operating point measurement

Then I locked the IMC and changed the input power step by step with a step size of about 2 [W]. In each step, I manually moved the reference signal such that the output signal stays around zero [V]. This tells us how the operating point evolves as a function of the input power. I did this test from 2 [W] to 22 [W]. The result is shown in the second attachment. As you can see in the plot, the operating point evolves linearly against the input power as expected. Additionally, I recorded IM4_TRANS_SUM as well in order to check the linearity of the output power of the IMC. IM4_TRANS seems to be also linear. The data in txt format is attached as well.

Note that all the tests were done with PD1-4 as an intensity sensor. PD5-8 was not checked during the tests.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 18:14, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23081)

There are two things that don't make sense.

1. DC gain mismatch between the drawing/traveller  and the measurement.

When Second Loop boost, integrator and additional gain are all off and the variable gain slider is set to 0dB, the gain from REF signal monitor to Second Loop Output should be -220, taking into account the modification for the second loop electronics on the floor (D1300439, https://dcc.ligo.org/S1400214): -1 for the REF summation, -10dB (or 1/3.2) instead of 0dB for the variable gain amplifier, -100 for the last stage of "whitening" path (U34), and -7 for the daughter board.

D1300439 DC gain = -1/3.2*-100*-7=-220.

From Kiwamu's plots, the measured DC gain is about -12.5V/0.04V~ -310.

2. Mystery factor of two in REFSIG DAC output.

"REFSIG" slider has a mystery factor of 2 in the filter for the DAC output. As a result, when the slider is set to -0.577V, the output of the filter reads -1889 counts instead of -0.577V/40Vpp * 2^16ctspp = -945counts.

However, REF signal monitor, which I think is a read back of the offset voltage coming out of REFSIG DAC channel, reads -940 counts and 0.574V.

H1 ISC (IOO, ISC, OpsInfo, PSL)
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:30, Tuesday 03 November 2015 - last comment - 18:40, Tuesday 03 November 2015(23064)
minor change in ISC_LOCK guardian: ISS 2nd loop notifications

Per JimW's request (alog 23032), I edited the ISC_LOCK guardian such that it throws notification messages when the ISS 2nd loop fails in the engagement. I have reloaded ISC_LOCK and checked the code into the SVN.

The notification messages will be displayed (1) if the IMC_LOCK guardian falls back to the LOCKED state (which is the programmed failure sequence) and/or (2) if the engagement process takes more than 4 minutes. The below are the new version of the ENGAGE_ISS_2ND_LOOP state. The red lines are the ones I newly added.

 

* * * * * * in ENGAGE_ISS_2ND_LOOP * * * * * *

    def main(self):
        nodes['IMC_LOCK'] = 'ISS_ON'
        self.wait_iss_minutes = 4.0 # in [min]
        self.timer['ISSwait'] = self.wait_iss_minutes*60 # in [sec]


    @get_watchdog_IMC_check_decorator(nodes)
    @nodes.checker()
    def run(self):
        # notify when the ISS fails. 2015-Nov-3, KI
        if nodes['IMC_LOCK'] == 'LOCKED' or nodes['IMC_LOCK'] == 'OPEN_ISS':
            notify('!! 2nd loop engagement failed !!')    
        # notify when the ISS is taking too many minutes. 2015-Nov-3, KI
        if self.timer['ISSwait']:
            notify('ISS spent more than %d minutes. Check ISS'%(self.wait_iss_minutes))

        # if IMC arrives at the requested state, move on.
        return nodes['IMC_LOCK'].arrived

Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 18:40, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23083)

Later today, we confirmed that the ISC_LOCK guardian behaved as intended -- it displayed the messages when the ISS failed in the engagement. Also there were a few minor typos which are now fixed. The guardian code is checked into the SVN.

H1 AOS
miquel.oliver@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:47, Friday 30 October 2015 - last comment - 22:22, Tuesday 03 November 2015(22978)
Proposal to change the DTT template displaying MICH. (from the Hanning window to Flat-top)

The DTT template for showing the MICH spectrum on the control room wall is suffering from leakage,  preventing us from seeing some features in the 8 to 11 Hz range. The current parameters and window are:

 

Window: Hanning

Start/end frequencies: 0/74444Hz 

BW: 0.1Hz 

Overlap: 70% 

Avarages: 3

Resulting BW: 0.18Hz

 

After playing with the available windows (but keeping all other parameters fixed so it will refresh with the same latency), I have found that Flat-Top reduces the resulting BW to 0.24Hz but also reduces the leakage problem. This would allow us to see features over the problematic range. The first two attached figures correspond to 2015-10-28 14:48:24 ; they show how the Hanning window suffers from a real leakage problem while Flat-top maintains it’s performance. The feature over 8Hz corresponds to a problem solved by Bubba on log (22939). 

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 11:33, Friday 30 October 2015 (22979)

I rather prefere to change the whitening filter, instead of chaging the windowing method.

miquel.oliver@LIGO.ORG - 22:22, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23090)

Jeff and Miquel changed the DTT template displaying MICH, the new parameters and window are:

Window: Flat-Top

Start/end frequencies: 0/74444Hz 

BW: 0.08Hz 

Overlap: 70% 

Avarages: 3

Resulting BW: 0.235628Hz

We believe that changing the whitening filter will not solve this leakege problem. The Hanning window resolves the frequency location better i.e smaller *BW but it's error in amplitude is up to 16%, whereas the FlatTop window measures better amplitude there for in this case reduses the leakege problem.

H1 ISC (DetChar)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:35, Wednesday 21 October 2015 - last comment - 23:13, Wednesday 04 November 2015(22710)
evidence that scattered light couples anthropegenic noise to DARM up to 250 Hz

We have a few piece of evidence that suggest that anthropegenic noise (probably trucks going to ERDF) couples to DARM through scattered light which is most likely hitting something that is attached to the ground in the corner station.

  1. Our spectrum is more non-stationary between 100-200 Hz durring times of high anthropegenic noise. Nairwita noted this by looking through summary pages (these glitches only seem to appear on weekdays between 7 am and 4pm local (14-23UTC), and not on Hanford Fridays when anthropegenic noise is low), and Jordan confirmed this by making a few comparisons of high/low anthropegenic noise within lock stretches.  (alog 22594)
  2. Corner station ground sensors are a good witness of these glitches.  HVETO shows this clearly (see page for October 14th for example).  Also, comparison of bandpassed DARM to several corner ground motion sensors and accelerometers show that glitches in DARM coincide with ground motion (for example see nutsinee's alog 22527)
  3. The DARM spectragram at the time of these glitches show what looks like scattering arches from 1 Hz motion and a velocity of around 40 um second total path length change. alog 22523  Both this high velocity and the fact that the seismometers on the tables don't seem to witness this motion well suggest that something bolted to the ground is involved in the scattering. This velocity is probably too high for something bolted to the ground.
  4. The scattering amplitude ratio (ration of scattered amplitude to DC readout light on DCPDs) we would estimate bassed on the fringes in DARM 1e-5, similar to what we got in April  Using the ISCT6 accelerometer to predict the velocity of the motion doesn't quite work out.
  5. Annamaria and Roert did some PEM injections in the east bay, which showed a linear coupling to DARM.  Annamaria is still working on the data and trying to disentangle downconverion from the linear coupling, but if we assume that scattered light is responsible for the linear coupling the amplitude ratio is fairly consistent with what we got from the fringe wrapping when trucks go by.

On monday, Evan and I went to ISCT6 and listened to DARM and watched a spectrum while tapping and knocking on various things.  We couldn't get a response in DARM by tapping around ISCT6.  We tried knocking fairly hard on the table, the enclosure, tapping aggresively on all the periscope top mirrors, and several mounts on the table and nothing showed up.  We did see something in DARM at around 100 Hz when I tapped loudly on the light pipe, but this seemed like an excitation that is much louder than anything that would normaly happen.  Lastly we tried knocking on the chamber walls on the side of HAM6 near ISCT6, and this did make some low frequency noise in DARM.  Evan has the times of our tapping.

It might be worth revisiting the fringe wrapping measurements we made in April by driving the ISI, the OMC sus, and the OMs.  It may also be worth looking at some of the things done at LLO to look accoustic coupling through the HAM5 bellow (19450 and 

19846)

Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 21:37, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23089)

14:31: tapping on HAM6 table

14:39: tapping on HAM6 chamber (ISCT6 side), in the region underneath AS port viewport

14:40: tapping on HAM6 chamber (ISCT6 side), near OMC REFL light pipe

14:44: with AS beam diverter open, tapping on HAM6 chamber (ISCT6 side)

14:45: with OMC REFL beam diverter open, tapping on HAM6 chamber (ISCT6 side)

14:47: beam diverters closed again, tapping on HAM6 chamber (ISCT6 side)

All times 2015-10-19 local

nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 23:13, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23122)DetChar

I've made some plots based on the tap time Evan recorded (the recorded time seems off by half a minute or so compare to what really shows up in the accelerometer and DARM). Not all taps created signals in DARM but every signal that showed up in DARM has the same feature in a spectrogram (visible at ~0-300Hz, 900Hz, 2000Hz, 3000Hz, and 5000Hz. See attachment2). Timeseries also reveal that whether or not the tap would show up in DARM does not seems to depend on the overall amplitude of the tap (seen in HAM6 accelerometer, see attachment 3). PEM spectrum during different taps times doesn't seem to give any clue why one tap shows up in DARM more than the other (attachment 4,5). Apology for the wrong conclusion I drew earlier based on the spectrum I plotted using wrong GPS time (those plots have been deleted).

Images attached to this comment
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - 20:41, Wednesday 04 November 2015 (23127)

I zoomed in a little closer at higher frequency and realized this pattern is similiar to the unsolved n*505 glitches. Could this be a clue to figuring out the mechanism that caused the n*505?

Images attached to this comment
H1 INJ (DetChar, INJ)
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:59, Wednesday 07 October 2015 - last comment - 17:24, Tuesday 03 November 2015(22316)
Tested PCALX with new inverse actuation filter
Summary:

We had single-IFO time so I tested the new inverse actuation filter for PCALX. WP5530

Sudarshan and I believe we tracked down the factor of 2 and sign error from the initial PCALX test, see aLog 22160. We wanted to do this test to confirm that.

CBC injections:

The waveform file is: https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/H1/coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out

The XML parameter file is: https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/h1l1coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.xml.gz

I did three CBC injections. The start times of the injections were: 1128303091.000000000, 1128303224.000000000, and 1128303391.000000000.

The command line to do the injections is:
ezcawrite H1:CAL-INJ_TINJ_TYPE 1
awgstream H1:CAL-PCALX_SWEPT_SINE_EXC 16384 coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 1.0 -d -d >> 20151006_log_pcal.out
awgstream H1:CAL-PCALX_SWEPT_SINE_EXC 16384 coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 1.0 -d -d >> 20151006_log_pcal.out
awgstream H1:CAL-PCALX_SWEPT_SINE_EXC 16384 coherenttest1from15hz_1126257408.out 1.0 -d -d >> 20151006_log_pcal.out

I have attached the log. I had to change the file extension to be posted to the aLog.

DetChar injection:

I injected Jordan's waveform file: https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/detchar/detchar_03Oct2015_PCAL.txt

The start time of the injection is: 1128303531.000000000

The command line to do the injections is:
awgstream H1:CAL-PCALX_SWEPT_SINE_EXC 16384 detchar_03Oct2015_PCAL.txt 1.0 -d -d >> 20151006_log_pcal_detchar.out

I have attached the log. I had to change the file extension to be posted to the aLog.
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
christopher.buchanan@LIGO.ORG - 20:16, Wednesday 07 October 2015 (22318)DetChar

Chris Buchanan and Thomas Abbott,

Quick follow-up with omega scans. It looks like most of the power is seen in GDS-CALIB_STRAIN about eight seconds after each listed injection time, consistently for each of these three injections. Doesn't look like there are omicron triggers for these times yet, but omega scans for GDS-CALIB_STRAIN are attached.

Full omega scans generated here:
https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~christopher.buchanan/Omega/Oct07_PCALX_Inj1/

https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~christopher.buchanan/Omega/Oct07_PCALX_Inj2/

https://ldas-jobs.ligo.caltech.edu/~christopher.buchanan/Omega/Oct07_PCALX_Inj3/

Images attached to this comment
jordan.palamos@LIGO.ORG - 20:52, Wednesday 07 October 2015 (22320)

For complete documentation of the detchar safety injections:

The injections are 12 sine-gaussians, evenly spaced from 30hz to 430hz, 3 seconds apart with a Q of 6. There are three sets with increasing SNR of 25, 50, 100 (intended). However, the SNR is limited by the PCAL acuation range at higher frequencies.

To generate the waveforms I used the script written by Peter Shawhan / Andy located here: https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/websvn/filedetails.php?repname=injection&path=%2Fhwinj%2FDetails%2Fdetchar%2FGenerateSGSequencePCAL.m

I tuned the injections to stay within the PCAL actuation limits referenced in Peter Fritschel's document https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-T1500484.

The intended time (seconds from start time of injections), freqency, snr, and amplitude (in units of strain) for all injections are pasted below:

 

__time__   __freq__   __SNR__    __AMP__

    0.50       30.0      25.0    5.14e-21

    3.50       38.2      25.0    4.96e-21

    6.50       48.7      25.0    2.15e-21

    9.50       62.0      25.0    2.07e-21

   12.50       79.0      25.0    1.75e-21

   15.50      100.6      25.0    1.78e-21

   18.50      128.2      25.0    1.92e-21

   21.50      163.3      25.0    2.06e-21

   24.50      208.0      25.0    2.39e-21

   27.50      265.0      10.0    1.11e-21

   30.50      337.6       5.0    8.39e-22

   33.50      430.0       5.0    8.51e-22

   36.50       30.0      50.0    1.03e-20

   39.50       38.2      50.0    9.92e-21

   42.50       48.7      50.0    4.31e-21

   45.50       62.0      50.0    4.14e-21

   48.50       79.0      50.0    3.51e-21

   51.50      100.6      50.0    3.55e-21

   54.50      128.2      50.0    3.85e-21

   57.50      163.3      50.0    4.12e-21

   60.50      208.0      50.0    4.77e-21

   63.50      265.0      20.0    2.21e-21

   66.50      337.6      10.0    1.68e-21

   69.50      430.0      10.0     1.7e-21

   72.50       30.0     100.0    2.06e-20

   75.50       38.2     100.0    1.98e-20

   78.50       48.7     100.0    8.62e-21

   81.50       62.0     100.0    8.27e-21

   84.50       79.0     100.0    7.01e-21

   87.50      100.6     100.0     7.1e-21

   90.50      128.2     100.0    7.69e-21

   93.50      163.3     100.0    8.24e-21

   96.50      208.0     100.0    9.54e-21

   99.50      265.0      40.0    4.43e-21

  102.50      337.6      20.0    3.36e-21

  105.50      430.0      20.0     3.4e-21

 

 

christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 12:43, Thursday 08 October 2015 (22344)DetChar, INJ
Here are the SNR of the CBC injections using the daily BBH matching filtering settings:

end time               SNR   chi-squared  newSNR
1128303098.986  20.35  32.86            19.86
1128303231.985  22.62  32.73            22.10
1128303398.985  23.25  21.05            23.25

Expected SNR is 18.4.

Though a recovered SNR of 20 (about 10% percent difference from 18.4) is comparable to some of the SNR measurements when doing injections with CALCS in aLog 21890. Note this is the same waveform injected here except in aLog 21890 it starts from 30Hz. In both cases the matched filtering starts at 30Hz. The last two have a bit higher SNR though.
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 13:42, Thursday 08 October 2015 (22348)DetChar, INJ
I edited Peter S.'s matlab script to check the sign of these PCAL CBC injections.

Looks like the have the correct sign. See attached plots.

To run code on LHO cluster:
eval '/ligotools/bin/use_ligotools'
matlab -nosplash -nodisplay -r "checksign; exit"

Also in hindsight I should have done a couple CALCS CBC injections just to compare the SNR at the time with the PCAL injections.
Images attached to this comment
Non-image files attached to this comment
jordan.palamos@LIGO.ORG - 17:01, Friday 09 October 2015 (22383)
I checked for overflows using TJ's script with the following command:

gwdetchar-overflow -i H1 -f H1_R -O segments -o overflow --deep  1128303500 1128303651 124

It returns an empty table, so no overflows.

peter.shawhan@LIGO.ORG - 20:27, Saturday 10 October 2015 (22400)
A time-domain check of the recovered strain waveforms is here: https://wiki.ligo.org/Main/HWInjO1CheckSGs.  I found that the sign is correct, the amplitude matches within a few percent at most frequencies, and the phases are generally consistent with having a frequency-independent time delay of 3 or 4 samples (about 0.2 ms).  Details are on that wiki page.
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 17:24, Tuesday 03 November 2015 (23079)DetChar, INJ
Thomas Abbot, Chris Buchanan, Chris Biwer

I've taken Thomas/Chris' table of recovered omicron triggers for the PCAL detchar injection and calculated the ratio of expected/recovered SNR and added some comments:

Recovered time      time since                 frequency recovered expected  recovered/expected        comments
                               1128303531 (s)          (Hz)           SNR        SNR           SNR
1128303531.5156	0.515599966	         42.56	34.07	25	            1.3628
1128303534.5078	3.5078001022	        61.90	39.41	25	            1.5764
1128303537.5039	6.5039000511	        64.60	28.29	25	            1.1316
1128303540.5039	9.5039000511	        79.79	23.89	25	            0.9556
1128303543.5039	12.5039000511	1978.42	21.38	25           	0.8552                                  suspicious, the frequency is very high
1128303546.502	15.5020000935	 144.05	26.24	25	           1.0496
1128303549.502	18.5020000935	 185.68	26.38	25	           1.0552
1128303552.502	21.5020000935	 229.34	26.29	25	           1.0516
1128303555.501	24.5009999275	 918.23	27.34	25	           1.0936
1128303558.501	27.5009999275	 315.97	11.05	10	           1.105
1128303564.5005	33.5004999638	 451.89	6.76	          5     	1.352
1128303567.5156	36.515599966	        50.12	68.53	50	          1.3706
1128303570.5078	39.5078001022	 61.90	78.23	50	          1.5646
1128303573.5039	42.5039000511	 76.45	52.04	50	          1.0408
1128303576.5039	45.5039000511	 91.09	48.42	50	          0.9684
1128303579.5039	48.5039000511	 116.63	47.73	50	         0.9546
1128303582.502	51.5020000935	 144.05	52.59	50	         1.0518
1128303585.502	54.5020000935	 177.91	52.3	        50	         1.046
1128303588.502	57.5020000935	 261.81	54.8	       50	          1.096
1128303591.501	60.5009999275	 323.36	55.64	50	          1.1128
1128303594.501	63.5009999275	 414.01	19.67	20	          0.9835
1128303597.501	66.5009999275	 390.25	9.55	       10	        0.955
1128303600.5005	69.5004999638	 481.99	9.34	        10	          0.934
1128303603.5156	72.515599966	         48.35	136.81	100	          1.3681
1128303606.5078	75.5078001022	 71.56	156.91	100	         1.5691
1128303609.5039	78.5039000511	 76.45	102.72	100	         1.0272
1128303612.5039	81.5039000511	 138.03	102.85	100	          1.0285
1128303615.5039	84.5039000511	 134.83	95.52	100	         0.9552
1128303618.502	87.5020000935	 1283.14	104.17	100	         1.0417                 frequency seems a bit high
1128303621.502	90.5020000935	 211.97	107.18	100	         1.0718
1128303624.502	93.5020000935	 261.81	104.53	100	         1.0453
1128303627.501	96.5009999275	 323.36	109.66	100	         1.0966
1128303630.501	99.5009999275	 414.01	42.15	40	        1.05375
1128303633.5005	102.5004999638	 959.39	19.11	20	        0.9555                  this last injection had some kind of glitch on it

In most cases looks like the ratio is within 0.1 of 1. On a quick glance I see 10 injections that were not within this range.
Displaying reports 62041-62060 of 84531.Go to page Start 3099 3100 3101 3102 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 End