Displaying reports 62121-62140 of 85777.Go to page Start 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 3108 3109 3110 3111 End
Reports until 22:34, Thursday 17 December 2015
H1 CAL
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:34, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24294)
Item for CAL Review: ASD Ratios between GDS C01 Calibration and PCAL at PCAL Line Frequencies
J. Kissel

As a part / start of the review process for the calibration pipeline, it has been requested that -- along with a long-term view of the PCAL to GDS-CALIB_STRAIN ratios (as shown in LHO aLOG 24285) -- we take snap-shots of the entire C01 GDS-CALIB_STRAIN spectrum at a smattering of times, and take the ASD ratios as has been done for the official strain sensitivity plots (see e.g. G1501223). I've done so over the early part of the run, between Sep 11 and Oct 22 2015, every 5 days or so, 
Sep 11 2015 20:30:43 UTC
Sep 18 2015 04:50:43 UTC
Sep 25 2015 07:23:43 UTC
Oct 01 2015 01:30:43 UTC
Oct 05 2015 05:31:43 UTC
Oct 11 2015 18:57:43 UTC
Oct 17 2015 07:41:43 UTC
Oct 22 2015 03:12:43 UTC
(recall that we get 420 [sec] of data for each ASD -- see T1500365).  Attached are the zooms of the ASDs of both GDS-CALIB_STRAIN and PCAL displacement around the three PCAL frequencies (
C01_H1_O1_Sensitivity_displacement_asd_pcalzoom.pdf) and the ratio of these ASDs (C01_H1_O1_Sensitivity_displacement_asd_pcalzoomratio.pdf) for these 8 data sets. I figured this was plot overload, so I leave all nine plots that come with each official strain simply committed to the CalSVN here:
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/H1/Results/DARMASDs/
where the collection of plots are dated accordingly (e.g.  2015-10-22_C01_H1_O1_Sensitivity.pdf). 

The message: for these spot-checks, the ratio between GDS C01 calibrated displacement and PCAL calibrated displacement is within the expected 10%, and all but the earliest data point data point is better than 5%. Very good -- great job CAL team!

-------
These plots were made with a generalization of the official strain producing script that now lives in
/ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/O1/Common/Scripts/produceofficialstrainasds_O1_C01.m
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 PSL (PSL)
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:22, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24293)
Crystal Chiller Topped Off 6:16 UTC

Per the Shift Check Sheet (for Thursday's task), I went and checked on the Crystal & Diode Chillers for the PSL.  The Crystal Chiller was not at maximum, so I added 125mL (basically to get the water's meniscus close to the "MAX" level).  NOTE:  according to the notepad, this was filled on 12/16 with 125mL also.

Diode Chiller was fine (no red error light).

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:42, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24292)
Mid Shift Summary

H1 has been locked for 5.5+ hrs with a range between 70-80Mpc (only one ETMy saturation).

All running well here.  I was not able to log into the ops workstation (operator0) at the beginning of the shift, but Jim B was able to remedy that.

Snowed earlier in the shift, and we have about 0.75" of snow on the ground currently.  Winds are at about 6mph & useism is at 0.4um/s

H1 DetChar (DetChar)
jacob.broida@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:28, Thursday 17 December 2015 - last comment - 11:44, Friday 18 December 2015(24291)
Recurring Glitch Source from Dec 16 BBH/BNS Triggers Identified
The omicron scans of the top ten Hanford BBH/BNS triggers on December 16th show a notable recurring wave-like glitch. The glitches are present in the following scans:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BBH/GW/1134302174/
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BBH/GW/1134294300/
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BBH/GW/1134291513/
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BNS/GW/1134295111/

Inspection of the auxiliary channels revealed that these signals seem to stem from one channel: H1:ASC-Y_TR_B_PIT_OUT_DQ.The scans for this channel are visible here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BBH/1134302174/#H1:ASC-Y_TR_B_PIT_OUT_DQ
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BBH/1134294300/#H1:ASC-Y_TR_B_PIT_OUT_DQ
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BBH/1134291513/#H1:ASC-Y_TR_B_PIT_OUT_DQ
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/BNS/1134295111/#H1:ASC-Y_TR_B_PIT_OUT_DQ

The rest of the scans from December 16th can be accessed from the chart here:

https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~jacob.broida/Dec16/Results.html
Comments related to this report
sudarshan.ghonge@LIGO.ORG - 11:44, Friday 18 December 2015 (24302)
BCV Results for the above glitches.

BBH Glitches
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~sudarshan.ghonge/BCV/O1/H1_glitch_151216_bbh/H1_1134289817_1134329417_webpage/

BNS Glitches
https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~sudarshan.ghonge/BCV/O1/H1_glitch_151216_bns/H1_1134282617_1134336617_webpage/
H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:13, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24289)
Shift Summary

TITLE:  12/17 Day Shift:  16:00-24:00UTC 

STATE of H1: Observing, only just

Support: Yes

Quick Summary: Quiet shift until an earthquake knocked us out of lock

Shift Activities:

17:45 Mitch to Optics Lab

19:00 Jodi to Mid-y and EndX, back 19:45

19:30 Kyle to Mid-X, back 20:00
 
22:00 Kyle to Mid-Y
17:45 Mitch to Optics Lab
19:00 Jodi to Mid-y and EndX, back 19:45
19:30 Kyle to Mid-X, back 20:00
22:00 Kyle to Mid-Y17:45 Mitch to Optics Lab
19:00 Jodi to Mid-y and EndX, back 19:45
19:30 Kyle to Mid-X, back 20:00
22:00 Kyle to Mid-Y
H1 General
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:24, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24288)
Mid shift summary

It was a relatively quiet shift. We were locked at about 75 Mpc until about 15 minutes ago when a 6.4 earthquake in Mexico hit us.  .03-.1 hz ground motion is about 5 microns. Otherwise, wind is moderate, microseism was about .5 microns. Now we play the waiting game.

H1 SEI (DetChar)
jim.warner@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:39, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24287)
ETMX Z HEPI sensor correction ramped off, switching to Commissioning for a bit.

I've taken some measurements indicating the EX sensor correction in Z is causing problems for the ISI. I've ramped it off,   watching the IFO for issues and will be taking some measurements. This may result in a change of configuration for the ISI, eventually.

H1 CAL (CAL)
sudarshan.karki@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:45, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24285)
H1 GDS and Pcal Strain Comparison
This is a comparison between the output of GDS strain and Strain as predicted by Pcal, both in magnitude and phase. The data utilized here is obtained from SLM Tool and some known corrections are applied before calculating the ratios.
  1. Data Retrieval: The appropriate channels, listed in the link below, are read from the frames, and 60s FFT is done to obtain amplitude, uncertainty and phase at the calibration line frequencies. This FFTed data is stored as a txt file at location in the link below.
  2. Data Analysis: The GDS-CALIB_STRAIN produces ‘Strain' so no further processing is needed. However for Pcal signals (photodiode readouts), some post-processing is needed to convert it into ‘Strain'.
    • Following Corrections are applied:
      • inverse of Digital and Analog Anti Aliasing filter.
      • pcal signal is whitened so needs dewhitening.
      • correct for IOP time delay
      • correct for time delay coming from model difference. (there should be a  61 us delay between Pcal and GDS which was realized at a later date so the data analyzed here did not need this correction). 
      • divide by arm length to convert displacement to strain
    • All these corrections are done using the matlab script xpcalcorrectionL1/H1. 
    • After the corrections, the ratio between GDS and Pcal is taken at all calibration line frequencies.
    • The scripts used to produce all these ratio plots are located here: https://svn.ligo.caltech.edu/svn/aligocalibration/trunk/Projects/PhotonCalibrator/scripts/SLMTool/
    • Each set of plots contains
      • Time Series of all kappas calculated using the equation in T1500377 and the data from SLM Tool . (Page 1)
      • Time series of relevant kappas (kappa_tst, kappa_c and f_c) and their histogram. (Page 2)
      • Plot of GDS/Pcal, both magnitude and phase ( including time series and histogram) at 4 calibration line frequencies. (Page 3-6).
  3. Results for H1: 
    • Representative 5 days were picked between Sept 11 and Oct 21 ( 09/18, 09/23, 10/05, 10/11, 10/14, 10/18).
    • The ratio of magnitude is closer to 1, within 5%, and any discrepancy is a direct consequence of change in actuation function reflected  in kappa_tst.
    • The phase shows some discrepancy until 19 Sep, which corresponds to 13 us, because GDS was not corrected for arm-delay. 
    • https://ldas-jobs.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/~sudarshan.karki/GDSPcalCompare/H1_SLMTOOL_Analysis.pdf

All these analysis were  done in C00 data and I am sure these discrepancy in phase will disappear on C01 data. I will analyze and confirm it once the SLM data for C01 is available.

H1 CAL (CAL, ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 07:34, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24272)
Methodology Prep for Today's Actuation Scale Factor Assessment Suite
J. Kissel, K. Izumi, J. Betzwieser

Since we've last taken the full actuation characterization measurement suite (see LHO aLOG 20940, T1500383), we've revised a few bits of the measurement methodology such that we might have more successful measurements. I recall them here to help us remember what we plan to do.

The major differences are as follows:
(1) Order of measurements (LLO innovation). In order to try to make the suite as robust against environmental or other reasons for lock-loss, Joe has suggested that we take the full IFO portions of the suite *first* while the IFO is stable and fully operational. These "final results" are really the only measurements that *need* to be in the same lock stretch, such that we can make sure that the optical gain of the FULL IFO is the same. Only after all 6 of those sweeps are complete, *then* we intentionally break the IFO and begin the ALS DIFF and Free-swinging Michelson measurements with lesser configurations of the IFO. The full outline of the measurements is attached as a picture.

(2) Merging of Free-swinging Michelson and ALS DIFF, IFO propogation measurements (LLO innovation). To-date, LHO has propagated the Free-Swinging Michelson absolute calibration from ITMX L2 stage to ETMX using the traditional single arm locked on red. However, during his last attempt, Joe had used ALS DIFF to propagate the the absolute calibration because (a) ALS DIFF is a more sensitive measurement and (b) we need to lock ALS DIFF anyways in our path propogate the ALS DIFF absolute calibration.

(3) Using the "super actuator" ALS DIFF transfer function (LHO innovation). This was mentioned in LHO's last attempt (see 20940). The idea being to reduce the number of seeps by one, by taking advantage of a little loop math:
From a simple diagram of the loop, one can show that  
   L3 LOCK IN2       1
   ----------- = ----------
   L3 LOCK EXC   1 + G_DIFF
which is true with any excitation at any point around the loop, just like is done "normally" done with a DARM IN2 / DARM EXC TF. Further, 
DIFF_PLL_CTRL       1
------------- = ----------  x  ETMX  x  DIFF
L3 LOCK EXC     1 + G_DIFF
one can immediately see that the absolute calibration of the super-actuator ETMX falls out of ratio of these two transfer functions, assuming you have the absolute calibration of DIFF such that you can divide it out (i.e. the [Hz/ct] and z:p = 40:1.6 Hz pair of the VCO, i.e. measurements (3) and (4), which we do, a priori). What's great, is that since you're using the same excitation, as long as you store both of these channels in the template, you can directly measure and export the transfer function ratio that you really want,
   DIFF_PLL_CTRL
   ------------- = ETMX x DIFF
    L3 LOCK IN2
and thus you've reduced two measurments into one.
Images attached to this report
H1 General
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:27, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24284)
Owl Mid Shift Summary

BNS range is taking a small dip of ~5 Mpc. Probably due to an increasing traffic. Otherwise everything looks good. Wind speed < 10mph. Useism hanging out at 50th percentile. Ground motion in EQ band is trending downward. Couple of ETMY saturation since shift started.

LHO General
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:01, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24283)
EVE Ops Summary

TITLE:  12/16 EVE Shift:  00:00-08:00UTC (16:00-00:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

STATE of H1:   NLN around 80Mpc (Observing for last 4.5+ hrs)

Incoming Operator:  Nutsinee

Support:  Sheila helped me out.

Quick Summary:

Documentary crew in Control Room at beginning of the shift.  One lockloss due to EPICS freeze & another due to operator error (trying to fix SR3 Cage Servo to prevent lockloss which occurred due to the EPICS freeze).  Pretty decent double coincidence.

Shift Activities:

H1 DetChar (DetChar, INJ)
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - posted 21:32, Wednesday 16 December 2015 - last comment - 19:35, Thursday 17 December 2015(24282)
hardware injections done
Summary:

There were 11 scheduled hardware injections:
1134345924 1 1.0 coherentbbh10_1128678894_
1134348928 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_
1134353728 1 1.0 coherentbbh15_1128678894_
1134354928 1 1.0 coherentbbh16_1128678894_
1134356128 1 1.0 coherentbbh17_1128678894_
1134357328 1 1.0 coherentbbh18_1128678894_
1134359800 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_
1134361000 1 1.0 coherentbbh12_1128678894_
1134362200 1 1.0 coherentbbh13_1128678894_
1134363400 1 1.0 coherentbbh14_1128678894_
1134364600 1 1.0 coherentbbh19_1128678894_

The first column is the start time of the injection. The second column is an integer that specifies that it was a CBC injection. The third column is the scale factor. And the fourth column is the beginning prefix of the parameter/waveform files.

The waveform files can be found here: https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/H1/ and https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/L1/

The parameter files can be found here: https://daqsvn.ligo-la.caltech.edu/svn/injection/hwinj/Details/Inspiral/

Two of these happened in L1 only because H1 lost lock. Those two are:
1134348928 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_
1134357328 1 1.0 coherentbbh18_1128678894_

Segments:
The segment database reports 9 injections for the H1:ODC-INJECTION_CBC:2 flag:
1134345929,1134345931
1134353734,1134353735
1134354934,1134354935
1134356134,1134356135
1134359806,1134359807
1134361005,1134361007
1134362206,1134362207
1134363405,1134363407
1134364606,1134364607

And 11 for L1:ODC-INJECTION_CBC:2 flag:
1134345929,1134345931
1134348934,1134348935
1134353734,1134353735
1134354934,1134354935
1134356134,1134356135
1134357333,1134357335
1134359806,1134359807
1134361005,1134361007
1134362206,1134362207
1134363405,1134363407
1134364606,1134364607
Comments related to this report
salvatore.vitale@LIGO.ORG - 19:35, Thursday 17 December 2015 (24290)
Parameter estimation started. Results will appear here

https://www.lsc-group.phys.uwm.edu/ligovirgo/cbcnote/ParameterEstimationModelSelection/O1_PE/HardwareInjs_12162015

ping salvo or john for questions/comments
H1 ISC (Lockloss)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:11, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24278)
lockloss initing guardian

In loading the new code for the SR3 cage servo, I caused the guardian to go into error (because there is a self.counter that is initalized in main and used in run). This took us out of observing.  I took the CAGE_SERVO guardian to manual, turned it off and back on so that it would initalize the counter.  Then I attempted to INIT ISC_LOCK so that it would manage the CAGE_SERVO again. The cage servo is managed by the DRMI guardian, though.  I took DRMI to manual, init, this broke the lock for some reason that I don't understand at all.

Apologies.

H1 AOS
corey.gray@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:14, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24277)
Transition To EVE Shift Update

TITLE:  12/16 EVE Shift:  00:00-08:00UTC (16:00-00:00PDT), all times posted in UTC     

STATE of H1:   NLN just under 80Mpc

Outgoing Operator:  Jim

Quick Summary:

Walked in to find film crew in the middle of an interview, so held off entering the Control Room for a while, but Jim had H1 with still running from the lock I started from last night.  Once I was able to squeeze into the Control Room, after a while, H1 had a lockloss, and commissioners noted that that this was probably due to an "EPICS Freeze".  As far as I know, an "EPICS Freeze" symptom is that all the StripTool traces flatline & thus we appear to lose the ability to control H1 and thus have a lockloss.  For this one, the flatline happened on the order of 80sec and then we had the lockloss.  NOTE:  yesterday people mentioned "EPICS Freezes" last night, but they were shorter and we stayed locked.

Filming continues!  :)

H1 CDS (CDS, GRD, Lockloss)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:10, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24276)
Epics freeze SR3 cage servo lockloss

Dave, Sheila

At 00:47 UTC, we lost lock after a 45 second epics freeze.  The attached screenshot shows that the cage servo stopped updating, durring the freeze, which is the intended behavior since we modified the guardian (22754) to watch and not update the servo when the PITMON does not update. 

Dave looked up the guardian logs, and indeed the guardian does have the intended behavoir.  However, when the servo comes back on after being off this long it puts out a large number.  Now we have added a counter that gets incremented when the PITMON has not updated, and cleared when it is updated.  If PITMON has not updated in 16 cycles, the guardian will go to CAGE_SERVO_OFF, then should return to CAGE_SERVO_RUNNING and reinitalize the servo.  This will happen once a second until the epics freeze is over. 

Images attached to this report
H1 CDS (DAQ)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:25, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24275)
CDS model restart report Monday-Tuesday 14th-15th December 2015

O1 days 88-89 

model restarts logged for Tue 15/Dec/2015
2015_12_15 08:26 h1isietmx
2015_12_15 08:28 h1isietmy
2015_12_15 08:33 h1isiitmx
2015_12_15 08:38 h1isiitmy
2015_12_15 08:42 h1isibs
2015_12_15 08:49 h1isiham6
2015_12_15 08:50 h1isiham5
2015_12_15 08:52 h1isiham4
2015_12_15 08:55 h1isiham3
2015_12_15 09:02 h1isiham2

Maintenance day, new ISI code for both BSC and HAMS. No DAQ restart required.

model restarts logged for Mon 14/Dec/2015 No restarts reported

H1 INJ (DetChar, INJ)
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:38, Wednesday 16 December 2015 - last comment - 21:24, Wednesday 16 December 2015(24265)
preparing for hardware injection tests
I'm preparing to do a set of hardware injection tests. I will update this aLog entry as injections are scheduled.

I first need to svn up the repo to get the injection files. And check that the latest version of tinj is installed.
Comments related to this report
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 15:53, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24266)
I am beginning by scheduling one hardware injection first. The schedule was updated with:
1134345924 1 1.0 coherentbbh10_1128678894_
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 16:05, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24267)
tinj was enabled at 00:02 UTC at H1.
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 16:43, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24269)
I did the following checks:
 * I checked the first injection to make sure it was flagged in the segment database. I queried H1:ODC-INJECTION_CBC:2 and L1:ODC-INJECTION_CBC:2 and found that both returned the segment [1134345929,1134345931). This looks good, it is what I expect.
 * I checked the tinj.log file as the injection was being performed. It was logged as successful.
 * I checked the TRANSIENT_OUT16 channel to check that the signal was injected. See attached plot.

Everything looks good. So I'm going to add the following to the schedule:
1134348928 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_
1134350128 1 1.0 coherentbbh12_1128678894_
1134351328 1 1.0 coherentbbh13_1128678894_
1134352528 1 1.0 coherentbbh14_1128678894_
1134353728 1 1.0 coherentbbh15_1128678894_
1134354928 1 1.0 coherentbbh16_1128678894_
1134356128 1 1.0 coherentbbh17_1128678894_
1134357328 1 1.0 coherentbbh18_1128678894_
1134358528 1 1.0 coherentbbh19_1128678894_
Images attached to this comment
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 17:11, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24270)
LHO lost lock a couple minutes before the injection scheduled for: 1134348928 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_. So this injection only went into L1.

I've removed the lines:
1134350128 1 1.0 coherentbbh12_1128678894_
1134351328 1 1.0 coherentbbh13_1128678894_
1134352528 1 1.0 coherentbbh14_1128678894_

from the schedule since LHO is still trying to relock.
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 19:27, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24279)
LHO  lost lock again.

The following line was then removed from the schedule file then:
1134358528 1 1.0 coherentbbh19_1128678894_
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 19:48, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24280)
Added the following lines to the schedule to re-do the injections that were skipped due to LHO losing lock:
1134359800 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_
1134361000 1 1.0 coherentbbh12_1128678894_
1134362200 1 1.0 coherentbbh13_1128678894_
1134363400 1 1.0 coherentbbh14_1128678894_
1134364600 1 1.0 coherentbbh19_1128678894_

Just to recap. Tonight tests the following injections are in the schedule:
1134345924 1 1.0 coherentbbh10_1128678894_
1134348928 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_
1134353728 1 1.0 coherentbbh15_1128678894_
1134354928 1 1.0 coherentbbh16_1128678894_
1134356128 1 1.0 coherentbbh17_1128678894_
1134357328 1 1.0 coherentbbh18_1128678894_
1134359800 1 1.0 coherentbbh11_1128678894_
1134361000 1 1.0 coherentbbh12_1128678894_
1134362200 1 1.0 coherentbbh13_1128678894_
1134363400 1 1.0 coherentbbh14_1128678894_
1134364600 1 1.0 coherentbbh19_1128678894_
christopher.biwer@LIGO.ORG - 21:24, Wednesday 16 December 2015 (24281)
These injections are now complete.
Displaying reports 62121-62140 of 85777.Go to page Start 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 3108 3109 3110 3111 End