Displaying reports 63021-63040 of 83316.Go to page Start 3148 3149 3150 3151 3152 3153 3154 3155 3156 End
Reports until 20:52, Monday 24 August 2015
H1 SUS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 20:52, Monday 24 August 2015 - last comment - 21:45, Monday 24 August 2015(20839)
ETMX UIM driver tripped
Jeff K. reports that the ETMX UIM driver has tripped. Cheryl reported this happening last Sunday: alog 20808

From plotting the L1 OSEM monitor signals it appears that it tripped on Aug 25 2015 03:08:25 UTC. (plot attached)
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 21:07, Monday 24 August 2015 (20844)
Tripped again, investigating.
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 21:30, Monday 24 August 2015 (20845)
Time of second trip: Aug 25 2015 03:55:50 UTC

Attached is a plot of the L1 OSEM monitors along with the L1 master out drive channels at the time of the second trip. It appears from this that the trip is not caused by the drive to the L1 coils.

The power switch for this coil driver was replaced on August 4: alog 20222
Non-image files attached to this comment
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 21:45, Monday 24 August 2015 (20847)
Tripped again at Aug 25 2015 04:31:16 UTC.
H1 ISC (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:21, Monday 24 August 2015 - last comment - 19:41, Monday 24 August 2015(20829)
ASC-AS_C as RIN sensor
Daniel, Dan, Stefan

I used the 45MHz modulation depth reduction in alog 20777 to fit the amount of 45MHz sideband on the ASC-AS_C_SUM diode:

reduction   ASC-AS_C_SUM cts
 0dB           38430
-1dB           32630
-2dB           27460
-3dB           23680

This suggests that we have the equivalent of 8796cts of power that doesn’t respond to the 45MHz modulation index reduction, plus 29735cts of 45MHz sideband power (at 0dB reduction).
Thus 29735/38430 = 77% of the total light is 45MHz sideband, and 23% is something else (mostly carrier).

For the ASC_AS-C_SUM calibration I get:

4e-4          fraction of HAM6 light on AS_C (alog 17738, super-seeds 15431)
x 800V/W      PD gain (alog 15431 -> 200V/W, but in the digital system we do not divide by 4)
x 10^(36/20)  whitening gain
x 1638.4cts/V ADC gain
= 33080 cts/Watt_HAM6

I get under nominal conditions (23W, Gamma=0.3, 0dB reduction):
899 mW of 45MHz light (compare that to an expected 23W(INPUT)*(.3)^2/2(MOD)*0.88(IMC)*0.89(NOM IFO TRANSMISSION) = 811mW)
and
266 mW of other light (carrier junk?).

20mA of light on the OMC_DCPD transmission, corresponding to about 25mW of "good" carrier light - 10 times less than the junk.

Also, if I use the calibration of the ASC-AS_C-SUM diode, normalizing it by the 29735cts of 45MHz SB, I should get a calibrated (power) RIN sensor.
I can look at the driven oscillator amplitude noise transfer function to x-check this: I would expect the power RIN / amplitude RIN TF to be equal to sqrt(2).

(Note: Daniel's RIN sensor calibrated in Vrms/rtHz / Vrms - a sqrt(2) of my previous alogs, which all quote RIN as Vrms/rtHz / V_pk, being equivalent to a rad_rms/rtHz number. )

I indeed get 1.4. (plot 1).
Plot 2 shows the same transfer function but using only the seg1, with the IOP channel (H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11). Again, 1.4.

Now things hang together...
Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 19:41, Monday 24 August 2015 (20830)
I can now use ASC-AS_C to check whether the amplitude noise on the 45MHz SB has changed before vs after the EOM driver change.

Plot 1 shows ASC-AS_C_SUM in cts (the data is from seg1 only, but a factor of 4 is included to mimic ASC-AS_C_SUM counts).
- Red vs blue (-3dB vs 0dB reduction in Gamma) shows a factor of 2 reduction in the noise level, consistent with a Gamma^2 scaling of the noise.
- Green shows the noise level before we installed the EOM driver. From the ASC_AS-C counts I estimated that the modulation index was slightly lower, and the noise is consistent with that.

Plot 2 shows all 3 traces calibrated in (power) RIN, using the calibration from the main entry, but either way, it looks like the (power) RIN has not changed during the EOM driver installation - very puzzling....

Finally, plot 3 shows the noise calibrated in Watt into HAM6.
Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 19:04, Monday 24 August 2015 (20838)
ASC-AS_B_RF45

(Sheila Evan Daniel)

The ASC-AS_B_RF45 sensor is currently not used for the auto-alignment. To investigate, if centering on the 2Ω is different from DC, we temporarily cabled its LO up to 90MHz. To revert back, remove the output cable from the 9MHz (currently 90MHz) distribution amplifier in ISC R3 (slot 37) and hook it back to the 45MHz distribution amplifier in the same rack (slot 33).

H1 ISC
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:49, Monday 24 August 2015 (20837)
Anit-whitening in LSC-ASAIR_B_18

This sensor had the analog whitening stage turned on and the digital anti-whitening stage turned off. Turned on the digital anit-whitening.

H1 CDS
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 17:08, Monday 24 August 2015 (20835)
Ops account problems
ssh, who and man commands all returned: 'Input/output error' but ps and grep commands worked
Firefox did not launch
gpg returned an error
I talked to Dave. He suggested I power cycle the computer and log in as myself instead of ops. I am going to use my own account for my shift.
H1 AOS (CDS, GRD, ISC, SYS, TCS)
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:54, Monday 24 August 2015 (20834)
Maintenance Day Plan Shapes Up

Attached is a shot of the white board for tomorrow.  Let's green up the SDFs tonight as several restarts are in the offing.

Images attached to this report
H1 CAL (ISC)
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:37, Monday 24 August 2015 - last comment - 02:51, Tuesday 25 August 2015(20833)
QUAD PUM Driver State Changed to LP ON, ACQ OFF (State 3)
J. Kissel, S. Dwyer, E. Hall

As I was about to characterizing the ETMY coil drivers (i.e. the UIM and PUM), I noticed that they were in their highest noise state. After conversations with Sheila and Evan, we (re)agreed that the PUMs should be run in their lowest noise state, which is with  LP ON and ACQ OFF, or State 3 from T1100507. As such, we've switched all QUADs to this state, and confirmed that ISC_LOCK guardian will ensure this to be true in the future (again). That guardian has been reloaded.

The reason they had been put back into high range (and taken out of the guardian) was that the range was needed to better damp the QUAD roll modes after they had been severely rung up in the Christmas Episode in early August. 

From a calibration stand point, this will affect the DARM calibration by a small amount, but I had not started characterizing the ETMY PUM drivers before I got started, and I'm now full aware of it, so it's affect will be fully understood and expected. As such, we're OK with this configuration change. Further, we'll all be happy with the little bit extra range we get from it (Evan will post an aLOG making a noise statement later)!
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 02:51, Tuesday 25 August 2015 (20854)

We can hear saturations on the quads during CARM offset reduction and when powering up, but I suppose that's the price we pay for the improved noise performance. [See attachment—blue is from yesterday (coils in high-range), red is from today (coils low range). I can't really claim that the improvements at 70+ Hz are from the coil switching, though.]

We would like to acquire with high range and then switch to low noise at some point during the lock, but the transients unlock the interferometer most of the time. Jeff suggests that we commission the digital switching delays. Perhaps that can be done parasitically with calibration activities.

Images attached to this comment
H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:00, Monday 24 August 2015 - last comment - 21:05, Monday 24 August 2015(20831)
Day Summary:

Calibration Measurements:

- Kiwamu, IFO down for calibrations, 9:05 - expected to be all day, continuing now

*** FYI, I move the IFO to Commissioning when this happened and should have been Calibrations - my bad.

 

Note; We are now in Calibration, so IFO has two states:

'"IFO is up'"  OR  "IFO is having calibration measurements run."

 

Today's parasitic IFO/site activities:

- JeffB to EY, dust monitor investigation, 9:07 - done

- Hugh to EX and EY, HEPI, 9:07 - done

- JeffK, ETMY, measuring coil drivers, 9:15

- Sudarshan, PEM channel check in LVEA, 9:20 - done

- TJ EX BRS reset - 9:54 - done

- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff - done

- Dave, EX, drawing updates - 12:10 - done

- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff, 12:54 - done

- more visits to end stations while there was the opportunity, but no changes, just monitoring or restoring equipment.

 

Currently no outstanding IFO issues.

Calibration measurements continue.

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 21:05, Monday 24 August 2015 (20843)

Calibration Measurements:

- Kiwamu, IFO down for calibrations, 16:05UTC - expected to be all day, continuing now

*** FYI, I move the IFO to Commissioning when this happened and should have been Calibrations - my bad.

 

Note; We are now in Calibration, so IFO has two states:

'"IFO is up'"  OR  "IFO is having calibration measurements run."

 

Today's parasitic IFO/site activities:

- JeffB to EY, dust monitor investigation, 16:07UTC - done

- Hugh to EX and EY, HEPI, 16:07UTC- done

- JeffK, ETMY, measuring coil drivers, 16:15UTC

- Sudarshan, PEM channel check in LVEA, 16:20UTC- done

- TJ EX BRS reset - 16:54UTC- done

- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff - done

- Dave, EX, drawing updates - 19:10UTC- done

- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff, 19:54UTC- done

- more visits to end stations while there was the opportunity, but no changes, just monitoring or restoring equipment.

 

Currently no outstanding IFO issues.

Calibration measurements continue.

H1 ISC
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:43, Monday 24 August 2015 - last comment - 20:53, Monday 24 August 2015(20827)
AS36 signal with BS and SRM dither lines

Stefan, Elli

On Saturday Stefan measured the AS36 signals with dither lines from the BS and SRM (alog 20777):

Lines:
H1:SUS-SRM_M3_ISCINF_P_EXC 7.0Hz, 300cts
H1:SUS-SRM_M3_ISCINF_Y_EXC 7.5Hz, 900cts
H1:SUS-BS_M3_ISCINF_P_EXC  8.0Hz, 100cts
H1:SUS-BS_M3_ISCINF_Y_EXC  8.5Hz,  30cts

Here are some plots of the AS36 signals demodulated against these line frequencies.  These signals  show how the sensitivy of the AS_36 WFS to the BS and SRM, which changes during the heat-up stage of the whole interferometer, and during 45MHz modulation depth reduction.  Attached are plots of the original and demodulated signals vs time.  Two vertical red lines are plotted; the first corresponds with when the IFO reaches full power, the second is when the 45MHz modulation depth reduction begins.  At the end of the time series the traces go crazy-  this is where Stefan reports lock was lost due to SRC1 yaw run away.

The following WFS channels are fed back to the optics at this point:
AS_B_RF36_I_PIT      >>   SRC1 PIT      (seen in demodulation of 7.0Hz line. Right two plots, red trace)
AS_B_RF36_I_YAW   >>   SRC1 YAW    (7.5 Hz line.  Right two plots, blue trace)
AS_A_RF36_I_PIT      >>   MICH PIT       (8 Hz line. Left two plots, red trace)
AS_B_RF36_Q_YAW  >>  MICH YAW    (8.5Hz line.  Right two plots, brown trace)

The SRC1 PIT signal doesn't change much, which is good.  SRC1 YAW has a 180deg ohase change during the heat-up stage.  Lines 1813 and 1815 of the guardian indicate a sign change in the ASC input matrix, maybe this corresponds to this phase change (?).  MICH PIT signal looks pretty good, getting close to 180deg phase at the end of the modulation depth reduction.  MICH YAW drifts downwards in phase, it looks like it hit -180deg just at the point we lost lock.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 20:53, Monday 24 August 2015 (20841)
Small correction: SRC1Y uses the following input matrix (alog 20699):
   AS_A_RF36_I_YAW to SRC1_Y : -3
   AS_B_RF36_I_YAW to SRC1_Y :  1
H1 CAL (CAL)
sudarshan.karki@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:21, Monday 24 August 2015 (20803)
DELTAL CTRL Whitening Filter

Following up to the problem (insufficient whitening) reported in  alog 20700,  new dewhitening filters  are implemented in the following DEALTAL_CTRL channels:

 

H1:CAL-CS_DARM_DELTAL_CTRL_M0/L1/L2/L3_WHITEN:  Original -- (zpk([1, 1, 1], [500,500,500],1,"n")

Changed to  (zpk([0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1], [100,100,100,100],1,"n")

H1:CAL-CS_DARM_DELTAL_CTRL_SUM_WHITEN: Original --(zpk([1, 1, 1,1,1], [100,100,500,500,500],1,"n")

Changed to  (zpk([0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1], [100,100,100,100],1,"n")

The first attached plot shows DARM CTRL signal with original filter in dotted  lines and the new filter  in solid lines.

The second plot shows the effect of different filter combinations on DARM_CTRL signal. This measurement gave us an intuition on what filter to use eventually.

Images attached to this report
H1 AOS (DetChar)
paul.schale@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:34, Monday 24 August 2015 - last comment - 12:30, Monday 24 August 2015(20823)
DQ Shift 20 August 00:00 UTC - 23 August 23:59 UTC

- Duty Cycle: 54%

- range: 75 - 85 Mpc

- PRM M3 LL coil driver caused noise in 10-60 Hz range on Friday, may have been responsible for some loud glitches

- Also on Friday there were some strange lines in the strain spectrogram at around 10Hz

- loud glitches that cause brief, large drop in range that we saw in ER7 continue; the rate is improved

- link to full DQ shift

Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 12:30, Monday 24 August 2015 (20824)CAL

Please note that the range on the summary pages is not correct.  The range displayed in the control room has been hovering around 60-65 Mpc, and this is much more realistic, although not yet blessed by the calibration group. 

H1 ISC (GRD)
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 04:49, Monday 24 August 2015 - last comment - 12:33, Monday 24 August 2015(20811)
Some cHard/PRC WFS investigation

Sheila, Evan

We looked again at the situation with the 45 MHz REFL WFSs, which are used as sensors for the PR3 ASC loop. In the end, we didn't implement any changes to the sensors or the associated loops.

We were motivated by the following:

  1. The current demod phases for these WFSs simply do not make sense; we expect that they should be similar (since the analog delays should be fairly well matched), but instead they are scattered by 100+ degrees.
  2. The cHard and PR3 loops are strongly cross-coupled. We would like to be able to turn up the gain of cHard without impressing extra motion from other optics into DARM. [20523, 20497]
  3. Any perturbation in the PR3 seems to couple into the SRC loops. We already know that the SRM loop is quite delicate, and we would like to get rid of this coupling if possible.

We tried the following:

After that, we couldn't get to full power because of an oscillation that showed up in dHard pitch when going to 20+ W. (We've seen this before, and it seems to be distinct from the angular instability mentioned above.) To get around this, we had to slightly beef up the resonant gain that gets turned on in dHard pitch when the power is increased.

Also, there were some small maintenance tasks that we did:

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - 12:33, Monday 24 August 2015 (20825)

Two of the chaanges that we made last night we kept. 

With the new phasing for refl 45, it was no longer a good sensor to use in DRMI, so we changed PRC2 in this configuration to using the sum of refl A and B 9I.  This is in the DRMI guardian and works fine, so we've left it there. 

We left the DC coupled OpLev off, we think the cage servo will have less drift. 

H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:16, Saturday 22 August 2015 - last comment - 02:44, Tuesday 25 August 2015(20793)
PRM M3 LL ramp-off

Jim, Evan

We have grown tired of the glitching in the PRM M3 LL OSEM, so here is a script that ramps it off in full lock. It gets rid of the glitching and allows us to recover 60ish Mpc range.

Also included is a screenshot of the usual Euler/OSEM matrix for PRM.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
andrew.lundgren@LIGO.ORG - 14:29, Sunday 23 August 2015 (20801)DetChar, ISC, SUS
From detchar, here are some glitchgrams to show just how well this works. The PRM M3 LL OSEM was ramped off at 3:43 UTC, and again at 7:13 UTC in a different lock (times gotten by check EUL2OSEM matrix elements). Two glitchgrams are attached which shows that the excess glitchiness goes away as soon as the LL quadrant is disabled. This is fantastic because these are one of our top most worrisome glitch classes from ER7.
Images attached to this comment
jeffrey.kissel@LIGO.ORG - 20:36, Monday 24 August 2015 (20840)DetChar
Hey @DetChar, can you make a glitch-gram of the H1:SUS-PRM_M3_NOISEMON_LL_DQ? 

Evan's gunna make a spectragram to see if it contains the same frequency content as the glitch grams (of DARM and the one you'll make). This "on/off" test of PRM M3 LL, at least shows that the frequency content of the glitching is below 50 [Hz]; if the content is similar in spectragram, we can use that -- a spectragram is much easier to make on the floor and/or at least here on site while the channel is being investigated. 

At this point, the entire drive chain is suspect, and we're not really sure where to start. I worry that starting without a more pointed target, it means we'll be looking for hours, slamming a sledge hammer blindly everywhere, and only come up with more questions. For example, as you know, these NoiseMons can be tricky. This particular PRM M3 LL NoiseMon has passed what tests that have been done on it (see LHO aLOG 17890), but the test is only a "which one of these doesn't look like the other" kind of test, not anything concrete.
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 21:08, Monday 24 August 2015 (20842)

Jeff and I looked at a time series trend of the LL noisemon when the interferometer was not locked, in order to give a baseline for diagnostics.

During a quiet time, it seems the peak-peak of the noisemon is about 30 counts, which [accounting for the ADC gain (216 ct / 40 V)] is something like 20 mV pp.

During a noisy time, the peak-peak can go as high as 100 counts, which is something like 60 mV pp.

Non-image files attached to this comment
andrew.lundgren@LIGO.ORG - 02:44, Tuesday 25 August 2015 (20853)DetChar, ISC, SUS
@Jeff - A glitchgram would not be terribly enlightening. Normalized spectrograms actually show these glitches very clearly, and even standard spectrograms are fine. 

These glitches only show up in DARM to about 70 Hz, but they're in PRCL up to 150 Hz (first plot). They're getting fed back to PRM, among other things, so all four quadrants' drive signals look like PRCL. The second plot is the normalized spectrogram of LL MASTER, and it's the same as PRCL. There's also something near Nyquist in the plot, but I think it's just spectral leakage in the spectrogram.

The characteristic of the LL noisemon (third plot), in contrast to the other noisemon, is that the glitches go up to 1 kHz. They happen at the same time as the glitches in MASTER, so below 150 Hz this doesn't tell us anything. But the higher-frequency content indicates that something before the noisemon is creating excess noise. And since the excess noise goes away as soon as the LL drive is zeroed, it's not just a problem in the noisemon.

The noisemon stops showing any glitches once the drive is zeroed, which may be a useful clue. Is it possible to drive a single line in MASTER and see what the noisemon shows?

The first three plots were all normalized spectrograms. The last two are standard spectrograms to show that these glitches do show up there. I used 0.25 sec FFTs with overlap of 0.9.
Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 10:13, Friday 14 August 2015 - last comment - 12:07, Friday 04 September 2015(20526)
Sensing noises in the OMC DCPDs

This entry is meant to survey the sensing noises of the OMC DCPDs before the EOM driver swap. However, other than the 45 MHz RFAM coupling, we have no reason to expect the couplings to change dramatically after the swap.

The DCPD sum and null data (and ISS intensity noise data) were collected from an undisturbed lock stretch on 2015-07-31.

Noise terms as follows:

The downward slope in the null at high frequencies is almost certainly some imperfect inversion of the AA filter, the uncompensated premap poles, or the downsampling filter.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 12:07, Friday 04 September 2015 (21214)

* What is the reasoning behind the updated suspension thermal noise plot?

* Its weird that cHard doesn't show up. At LLO, cHard is the dominant noise from 10-15 Hz. Its coupling is 10x less than dHard, but its sensing noise is a lot worse.

evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 10:59, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20680)

I remade this plot for a more recent spectrum. This includes the new EOM driver, a second stage of whitening, and dc-lowpassing on the ISS outer loop PDs.

This time I also included some displacement noises; namely, the couplings from the PRCL, MICH, and SRCL controls. Somewhat surprising is that the PRCL control noise seems to be close to the total DCPD noise from 10 to 20 Hz. [I vaguely recall that the Wipfian noise budget predicted an unexpectedly high PRCL coupling at one point, but I cannot find an alog entry supporting this.]

Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 14:33, Friday 21 August 2015 (20758)

Here is the above plot referred to test mass displacement, along with some of our usual anticipated displacement noises. Evidently the budgeting doesn't really add up below 100 Hz, but there are still some more displacement noises that need to be added (ASC, gas, BS DAC, etc.).

Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 16:25, Monday 24 August 2015 (20832)

Since we weren't actually in the lowest-noise quad PUM state for this measurement, the DAC noise from the PUM is higher than what is shown in the plot above.

If the updated buget (attached) is right, this means that actually there are low-frequency gains to be had from 20 to 70 Hz. There is still evidently some excess from 50 to 200 Hz.

Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 13:04, Friday 28 August 2015 (20990)

Here is a budget for a more recent lock, with the PUM drivers in the low-noise state. The control noise couplings (PRCL, MICH, SRCL, dHard) were all remeasured for this lock configuration.

As for other ASC loops, there is some contribution from the BS loops around 30 Hz (not included in this budget). I have also looked at cHard, but I have to drive more than 100 times above the quiescient control noise in order to even begin to see anything in the DARM spectrum, so these loops do not seem to contribute in a significant way.

Also included is a plot of sensing noises (and some displacement noises from LSC) in the OMC DCPDs, along with the sum/null residual. At high frequencies, the residual seems to approach the projected 45 MHz oscillator noise (except for the high-frequency excess, which we've seen before seems to be coherent with REFL9).

Evidently there is a bit of explaining to do in the bucket...

Non-image files attached to this comment
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 10:06, Friday 04 September 2015 (21210)

Some corrections/modifications/additions to the above:

  • I updated the optical gain and DARM pole using the pcal like at 331.9 Hz; from this line I find the transfer function from the TX PD into DCPD sum is (1.69 − 1.59i) mA/pm, which works out to an optical gain of 3.19 mA and a DARM pole of 353 Hz. I think Kiwamu may have a different number from his pcal sweep, so there might be some reconciliation to do.
  • I now compensate the extra 10 kHz pole that Kiwamu found in the readout chain of the DCPDs.
  • I remade the quantum noise curve for 23 W, and with a more realistic estimate of the losses. In addition to the 87 % quantum efficiency, I include 14 % readout losses that Lisa has already tabulated: we expect 96.5 % transmission through the OFI, 93 % transmission through the OMC, 99% reflection from OM3, and (according to Dan) 97 % mode matching into the OMC. This results in a quantum noise curve that is 6.6×10−20 m/Hz1/2 at 1 kHz. The DARM pole predicted by GWINC is 360 Hz or so (slightly higher than what I extracted from pcal).
  • Previously, I had tuned the arm losses in GWINC to give a recycling gain of 40 W/W. In light of Sheila's analysis, this is too optimistic; usually our recycling gains are more like 36 to 37 W/W. In GWINC, this amounts to tuning the arm losses to 90 ppm (per arm), which gives a gain slightly in excess of 37 W/W.
  • The null stream is 5 % – 7 % higher than the GWINC curve, so either some parameter is mistuned or we need to be looking for some extra readout loss.
  • I replaced the GWINC suspension thermal noise curve with a (hopefully) more accurate curve that I got from Sheila.
  • I replaced the oscillator noise trace (which was flat in DCPD photocurrent) with a trace based on the TF that Stefan and I took. I still assume the underlying noise contribution is flat in RIN, at a level of 3.5×10−8 mA/Hz1/2. This trace will become less relevant since the excess oscillator noise now appears to be gone.
  • I added gas noises. Squeeze film damping was calculated after T0900582 using the nominal parameters (our end station gauges read 1×10−8 torr, and I've assumed the dominant species is molecular hydrogen). For residual gas, I again assume the species is molecular hydrogen, and the arm pressure is taken to be 5×10−9 torr (which is a rough average of the arm gauges).
  • The ASC trace contains only the dHard and BS loops. I drove in cHard, but even after driving far, far above the ambient noise floor I could not make excess noise appear in DARM.

Of course, the budgeted noises don't at all add up from 20 Hz to 200 Hz, so we are missing something big. Next we want to look at upconversion and jitter noises, as well as control noise from other ASC loops.

Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:41, Thursday 23 July 2015 - last comment - 14:53, Monday 24 August 2015(19856)
Coherent broadband noise in OMC_DC_SUM
We observed broadband coherence of OMC_DC_SUM with ASC_AS_C_LF_SUM and ASC_A_RF36_PIT. We made some numbers and plots, using the 64kHz version of the channels.

First the measurements we made on OCXO oscillator:
- ASC_AS_C sees a RIN of about 5e-7/rtHz above 100Hz (either from H1:ASC-AS_C_SUM_OUT_DQ or from H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11). The same is true for its segment 1.
- The calculated shot noise RIN at 20mA (quantum efficiency 0.87) detected is 4.0e-9/rtHz.
- The 4.0e-9/rtHz agrees with DCPD_NULL_OUT_DQ's prediction (8.0e-8 mA/rtHz/20mA).
- DCPD_SUM_OUT_DQ sees a slightly elevated RIN of 4.6e-9/rtHz (9.2e-8 mA/rtHz/20mA).

- The RIN in DCPDA (H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12, corrected for the whitening) is about 5.9e-8 mA/rtHz, or RIN = 5.9e-9/rtHz at 20mA/2diodes (~15pm DARM offset)...
- ...or about 3.3e-8 mA/rtHz or 1.2e-8/rtHz at 5.7mA/2diodes (~8pm DARM offset).

- ASC-AS_C_SEG1 (H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11) and OMC-DCPD_A (H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12) shows a coherence of 0.053 at 20mA, suggesting a white noise floor a factor of 0.23 below shot noise.
- At 5.7mA the same coherence is about 0.13, i.e. the white noise floor is a factor of 0.39 below shot noise.
- These two measurements are in plot 1.

- Taking the last two statements together, we predict a coherent noise of
  - 5.9e-8 mA/rtHz *0.23 = 1.4e-8 mA/rtHz at 20mA/2diodes (~15pm DARM offset)  (RIN of coherent noise = 1.4e-9/rtHz) - The pure shot noise part is thus 5.7e-8 mA/rtHz
  - 3.3e-8 mA/rtHz *0.39 = 1.3e-8 mA/rtHz at 5.7mA/2diodes (~8pm DARM offset)  (RIN of coherent noise = 4.5e-9/rtHz) - The pure shot noise part is thus 3.0e-8 mA/rtHz.

- AS_C calibration:
 - 200V/W (see alog 15431)
 - quantum efficiency 0.8 (see alog 15431)
 - 0.25% of the HAM 6 light (see alog 15431)
 - We have 39200cts in the AS_C_SUM. Thus we have
   - 39200cts / (1638.4cts/V) * 10^(-36/40) (whitening) / (200V/W) = 1.89mW and AS_C. (shot noi
   - 1.89mW/0.025 = 76mW entering HAM6. I.e. we have slightly more sideband power than carrier power (Carrier: 27mW in OMC transmission).
   - Shot noise level on AS_C_SUM is at 2.0e-8 mA/rtHz, corresponding to a RIN of 1.6e-8/rtHz. I.e. the coherent noise seen at 5e-7/rtHz is high above the shot noise. Dark noise TBD.
   - The light entering HAM 6 has a white noise of 5e-7/rtHz*76mW = 3.8e-5 mW/rtHz 
    

Bottom line:
 -We have ~1.4e-8mA/rtHz, or 1.9e-8mW/rtHz of coherent white noise on each DCPD.
 -It corresponds to 3.8e-5mW/rtHz before the OMC, i.e. the the OMC seems to attenuate this component by 2000.
 -This noise stays at the same level (in mW/rtHz) for different DCPD offsets.


Next, we switched back to the IFR for testing. plot 2 shows the same coherences (all at 5.7mA / 8pm DARM offset), but on the IFR. Interestingly now AS_C and AS_A_RF36 start seeing different noise below 2kHz. We convinced our selfs that the higher excess noise seen in AS_A_RF36 is indeed oscillator phase noise from the IFR - so that is clearly out of the picture once of the OCXO. (Evan will shortly log the oscillator phase noise predictions.)


64k Channel list:
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12:     OMC-DCPD_A  (used in plot)
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH13:     OMC-DCPD_B
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH20:     REFLAIR_A_RF9_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH21:     REFLAIR_A_RF9_I
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH22:     REFLAIR_A_RF45_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH23:     REFLAIR_A_RF45_I
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH28:     REFL_A_RF9_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH29:     REFL_A_RF9_I
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH30:     REFL_A_RF45_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH31:     REFL_A_RF45_I


H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH8:      ASC-AS_A_RF36_I1
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH9:      ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q1
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH10:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_I2
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH11:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q2
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH12:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_I3
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH13:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q3   (used in plot)
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH14:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_I4
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH15:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q4

H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11:     ASC-AS_C_SEG1  (used in plot)
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH10:     ASC-AS_C_SEG2
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH9:      ASC-AS_C_SEG3
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH8:      ASC-AS_C_SEG4





Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 17:01, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19882)
Some more estimation - this time for frequency noise:

- Shot noise on the refl diodes is given by Pshot=sqrt(2*h*nu*Pr_lock)
- The cavity sensing function is P_9_pk = 4*Gam9*P0 * dNu(f)/(f_p + i*f), where P0 would be the carrier power incident on the PD without the IFO.
- from this we can estimate a frequency (phase) noise of about 8e-11 rad/rtHz.

Gam9=0.219; %alog15874
PSL_low=2; %W
Pr_nolock_low=13.7e-3; %W
PSL_lock=24;
Pr_lock=3.5e-3; %W
IMCt=0.88; 
att=Pr_nolock_low/(PSL_low*IMCt);
P0=PSL_lock*IMCt*att;
inlockdrop=Pr_lock/(P0);

Pshot=sqrt(2*h*nu*Pr_lock);
dphi=Pshot/P0/4/pi/Gam9;
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 12:28, Monday 27 July 2015 (19963)
For reference, I ran the numbers on where we would expect the sidebands to show a resonance feature.

I used the following values:
RITM=1939.3m
RETM=2241.54m
L=3994.485m

Checking accidental sideband resonances in the arm cavities:
Resonance condition: fres = FSR * (q  + (l+m+1)*fTM/FSR)
Free Spectral Range (FSR)    : 37.5258 kHz
Transverse Mode Spacing (fTM): 32.4297 kHz
Checking f1 sideband:
q=242	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 18.2284 kHz
q=242	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 0.534516 kHz
q=242	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 14.2013 kHz
q=241	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 4.56162 kHz
q=241	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 9.10514 kHz
q=-242	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 18.2284 kHz
q=-243	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 0.534516 kHz
q=-243	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 13.1322 kHz
q=-244	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 5.63065 kHz
q=-244	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 8.0361 kHz
Checking f2 sideband:
q=1212	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 16.0903 kHz
q=1212	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.67258 kHz
q=1212	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 16.3393 kHz
q=1211	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.42356 kHz
q=1211	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 11.2432 kHz
q=-1212	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 16.0903 kHz
q=-1213	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.67258 kHz
q=-1213	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 10.9942 kHz
q=-1214	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 7.76872 kHz
q=-1214	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 5.89804 kHz

stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 00:19, Wednesday 29 July 2015 (20014)ISC
Evan, Matt, Lisa

We did one more test for the broadband coherence noise: Common mode gain +3dB vs -3dB

We see no chnge in the broadband level of the noise below 10000Hz.
However, we do see an FSS gain oscillation at 7320Hz showing up in the OMC_DCPD_SUM - but not in AS_C_LF or AS_A_RF36 - in fact that coherence has adip where we get the frequency noise oscillation.
This strongly suggests that our broadband noise is NOT frequency noise.

Evan also took the frequency noise transfer function - a preliminary analysis here also confirms: the frequency noise should be significantly below the O(1e-8mA/rtHz) noise level we see.
Images attached to this comment
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 18:53, Sunday 02 August 2015 (20150)
Note that the higher order mode estimates above were made using a slightly wrong modulation frequency. Updated estimates for the correct modulation frequency are attached to alog 20147
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 14:20, Monday 24 August 2015 (20826)
 - ASC-AS_C GETS 2.5% of the HAM 6 light (see alog 15431) (NOT 0.25%)
daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - 14:53, Monday 24 August 2015 (20828)

Actually AS_C gets 400ppm of the light entering HAM6 -- the OM1 mirror was swapped from 5% transmission to 800ppm transmission in early April.  See alog:17738.

Displaying reports 63021-63040 of 83316.Go to page Start 3148 3149 3150 3151 3152 3153 3154 3155 3156 End