Jeff K. reports that the ETMX UIM driver has tripped. Cheryl reported this happening last Sunday: alog 20808 From plotting the L1 OSEM monitor signals it appears that it tripped on Aug 25 2015 03:08:25 UTC. (plot attached)
Tripped again, investigating.
Time of second trip: Aug 25 2015 03:55:50 UTC Attached is a plot of the L1 OSEM monitors along with the L1 master out drive channels at the time of the second trip. It appears from this that the trip is not caused by the drive to the L1 coils. The power switch for this coil driver was replaced on August 4: alog 20222
Tripped again at Aug 25 2015 04:31:16 UTC.
Daniel, Dan, Stefan I used the 45MHz modulation depth reduction in alog 20777 to fit the amount of 45MHz sideband on the ASC-AS_C_SUM diode: reduction ASC-AS_C_SUM cts 0dB 38430 -1dB 32630 -2dB 27460 -3dB 23680 This suggests that we have the equivalent of 8796cts of power that doesn’t respond to the 45MHz modulation index reduction, plus 29735cts of 45MHz sideband power (at 0dB reduction). Thus 29735/38430 = 77% of the total light is 45MHz sideband, and 23% is something else (mostly carrier). For the ASC_AS-C_SUM calibration I get: 4e-4 fraction of HAM6 light on AS_C (alog 17738, super-seeds 15431) x 800V/W PD gain (alog 15431 -> 200V/W, but in the digital system we do not divide by 4) x 10^(36/20) whitening gain x 1638.4cts/V ADC gain = 33080 cts/Watt_HAM6 I get under nominal conditions (23W, Gamma=0.3, 0dB reduction): 899 mW of 45MHz light (compare that to an expected 23W(INPUT)*(.3)^2/2(MOD)*0.88(IMC)*0.89(NOM IFO TRANSMISSION) = 811mW) and 266 mW of other light (carrier junk?). 20mA of light on the OMC_DCPD transmission, corresponding to about 25mW of "good" carrier light - 10 times less than the junk. Also, if I use the calibration of the ASC-AS_C-SUM diode, normalizing it by the 29735cts of 45MHz SB, I should get a calibrated (power) RIN sensor. I can look at the driven oscillator amplitude noise transfer function to x-check this: I would expect the power RIN / amplitude RIN TF to be equal to sqrt(2). (Note: Daniel's RIN sensor calibrated in Vrms/rtHz / Vrms - a sqrt(2) of my previous alogs, which all quote RIN as Vrms/rtHz / V_pk, being equivalent to a rad_rms/rtHz number. ) I indeed get 1.4. (plot 1). Plot 2 shows the same transfer function but using only the seg1, with the IOP channel (H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11). Again, 1.4. Now things hang together...
I can now use ASC-AS_C to check whether the amplitude noise on the 45MHz SB has changed before vs after the EOM driver change. Plot 1 shows ASC-AS_C_SUM in cts (the data is from seg1 only, but a factor of 4 is included to mimic ASC-AS_C_SUM counts). - Red vs blue (-3dB vs 0dB reduction in Gamma) shows a factor of 2 reduction in the noise level, consistent with a Gamma^2 scaling of the noise. - Green shows the noise level before we installed the EOM driver. From the ASC_AS-C counts I estimated that the modulation index was slightly lower, and the noise is consistent with that. Plot 2 shows all 3 traces calibrated in (power) RIN, using the calibration from the main entry, but either way, it looks like the (power) RIN has not changed during the EOM driver installation - very puzzling.... Finally, plot 3 shows the noise calibrated in Watt into HAM6.
(Sheila Evan Daniel)
The ASC-AS_B_RF45 sensor is currently not used for the auto-alignment. To investigate, if centering on the 2Ω is different from DC, we temporarily cabled its LO up to 90MHz. To revert back, remove the output cable from the 9MHz (currently 90MHz) distribution amplifier in ISC R3 (slot 37) and hook it back to the 45MHz distribution amplifier in the same rack (slot 33).
This sensor had the analog whitening stage turned on and the digital anti-whitening stage turned off. Turned on the digital anit-whitening.
ssh, who and man commands all returned: 'Input/output error' but ps and grep commands worked Firefox did not launch gpg returned an error I talked to Dave. He suggested I power cycle the computer and log in as myself instead of ops. I am going to use my own account for my shift.
Attached is a shot of the white board for tomorrow. Let's green up the SDFs tonight as several restarts are in the offing.
J. Kissel, S. Dwyer, E. Hall As I was about to characterizing the ETMY coil drivers (i.e. the UIM and PUM), I noticed that they were in their highest noise state. After conversations with Sheila and Evan, we (re)agreed that the PUMs should be run in their lowest noise state, which is with LP ON and ACQ OFF, or State 3 from T1100507. As such, we've switched all QUADs to this state, and confirmed that ISC_LOCK guardian will ensure this to be true in the future (again). That guardian has been reloaded. The reason they had been put back into high range (and taken out of the guardian) was that the range was needed to better damp the QUAD roll modes after they had been severely rung up in the Christmas Episode in early August. From a calibration stand point, this will affect the DARM calibration by a small amount, but I had not started characterizing the ETMY PUM drivers before I got started, and I'm now full aware of it, so it's affect will be fully understood and expected. As such, we're OK with this configuration change. Further, we'll all be happy with the little bit extra range we get from it (Evan will post an aLOG making a noise statement later)!
We can hear saturations on the quads during CARM offset reduction and when powering up, but I suppose that's the price we pay for the improved noise performance. [See attachment—blue is from yesterday (coils in high-range), red is from today (coils low range). I can't really claim that the improvements at 70+ Hz are from the coil switching, though.]
We would like to acquire with high range and then switch to low noise at some point during the lock, but the transients unlock the interferometer most of the time. Jeff suggests that we commission the digital switching delays. Perhaps that can be done parasitically with calibration activities.
Calibration Measurements:
- Kiwamu, IFO down for calibrations, 9:05 - expected to be all day, continuing now
*** FYI, I move the IFO to Commissioning when this happened and should have been Calibrations - my bad.
Note; We are now in Calibration, so IFO has two states:
'"IFO is up'" OR "IFO is having calibration measurements run."
Today's parasitic IFO/site activities:
- JeffB to EY, dust monitor investigation, 9:07 - done
- Hugh to EX and EY, HEPI, 9:07 - done
- JeffK, ETMY, measuring coil drivers, 9:15
- Sudarshan, PEM channel check in LVEA, 9:20 - done
- TJ EX BRS reset - 9:54 - done
- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff - done
- Dave, EX, drawing updates - 12:10 - done
- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff, 12:54 - done
- more visits to end stations while there was the opportunity, but no changes, just monitoring or restoring equipment.
Currently no outstanding IFO issues.
Calibration measurements continue.
Calibration Measurements:
- Kiwamu, IFO down for calibrations, 16:05UTC - expected to be all day, continuing now
*** FYI, I move the IFO to Commissioning when this happened and should have been Calibrations - my bad.
Note; We are now in Calibration, so IFO has two states:
'"IFO is up'" OR "IFO is having calibration measurements run."
Today's parasitic IFO/site activities:
- JeffB to EY, dust monitor investigation, 16:07UTC - done
- Hugh to EX and EY, HEPI, 16:07UTC- done
- JeffK, ETMY, measuring coil drivers, 16:15UTC
- Sudarshan, PEM channel check in LVEA, 16:20UTC- done
- TJ EX BRS reset - 16:54UTC- done
- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff - done
- Dave, EX, drawing updates - 19:10UTC- done
- Kyle, near EY (Y28) to gather stuff, 19:54UTC- done
- more visits to end stations while there was the opportunity, but no changes, just monitoring or restoring equipment.
Currently no outstanding IFO issues.
Calibration measurements continue.
Stefan, Elli
On Saturday Stefan measured the AS36 signals with dither lines from the BS and SRM (alog 20777):
Lines:
H1:SUS-SRM_M3_ISCINF_P_EXC 7.0Hz, 300cts
H1:SUS-SRM_M3_ISCINF_Y_EXC 7.5Hz, 900cts
H1:SUS-BS_M3_ISCINF_P_EXC 8.0Hz, 100cts
H1:SUS-BS_M3_ISCINF_Y_EXC 8.5Hz, 30cts
Here are some plots of the AS36 signals demodulated against these line frequencies. These signals show how the sensitivy of the AS_36 WFS to the BS and SRM, which changes during the heat-up stage of the whole interferometer, and during 45MHz modulation depth reduction. Attached are plots of the original and demodulated signals vs time. Two vertical red lines are plotted; the first corresponds with when the IFO reaches full power, the second is when the 45MHz modulation depth reduction begins. At the end of the time series the traces go crazy- this is where Stefan reports lock was lost due to SRC1 yaw run away.
The following WFS channels are fed back to the optics at this point:
AS_B_RF36_I_PIT >> SRC1 PIT (seen in demodulation of 7.0Hz line. Right two plots, red trace)
AS_B_RF36_I_YAW >> SRC1 YAW (7.5 Hz line. Right two plots, blue trace)
AS_A_RF36_I_PIT >> MICH PIT (8 Hz line. Left two plots, red trace)
AS_B_RF36_Q_YAW >> MICH YAW (8.5Hz line. Right two plots, brown trace)
The SRC1 PIT signal doesn't change much, which is good. SRC1 YAW has a 180deg ohase change during the heat-up stage. Lines 1813 and 1815 of the guardian indicate a sign change in the ASC input matrix, maybe this corresponds to this phase change (?). MICH PIT signal looks pretty good, getting close to 180deg phase at the end of the modulation depth reduction. MICH YAW drifts downwards in phase, it looks like it hit -180deg just at the point we lost lock.
Small correction: SRC1Y uses the following input matrix (alog 20699): AS_A_RF36_I_YAW to SRC1_Y : -3 AS_B_RF36_I_YAW to SRC1_Y : 1
Following up to the problem (insufficient whitening) reported in alog 20700, new dewhitening filters are implemented in the following DEALTAL_CTRL channels:
H1:CAL-CS_DARM_DELTAL_CTRL_M0/L1/L2/L3_WHITEN: Original -- (zpk([1, 1, 1], [500,500,500],1,"n")
Changed to (zpk([0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1], [100,100,100,100],1,"n")
H1:CAL-CS_DARM_DELTAL_CTRL_SUM_WHITEN: Original --(zpk([1, 1, 1,1,1], [100,100,500,500,500],1,"n")
Changed to (zpk([0.1,0.1,0.1,0.1], [100,100,100,100],1,"n")
The first attached plot shows DARM CTRL signal with original filter in dotted lines and the new filter in solid lines.
The second plot shows the effect of different filter combinations on DARM_CTRL signal. This measurement gave us an intuition on what filter to use eventually.
- Duty Cycle: 54%
- range: 75 - 85 Mpc
- PRM M3 LL coil driver caused noise in 10-60 Hz range on Friday, may have been responsible for some loud glitches
- Also on Friday there were some strange lines in the strain spectrogram at around 10Hz
- loud glitches that cause brief, large drop in range that we saw in ER7 continue; the rate is improved
Please note that the range on the summary pages is not correct. The range displayed in the control room has been hovering around 60-65 Mpc, and this is much more realistic, although not yet blessed by the calibration group.
Sheila, Evan
We looked again at the situation with the 45 MHz REFL WFSs, which are used as sensors for the PR3 ASC loop. In the end, we didn't implement any changes to the sensors or the associated loops.
We were motivated by the following:
We tried the following:
After that, we couldn't get to full power because of an oscillation that showed up in dHard pitch when going to 20+ W. (We've seen this before, and it seems to be distinct from the angular instability mentioned above.) To get around this, we had to slightly beef up the resonant gain that gets turned on in dHard pitch when the power is increased.
Also, there were some small maintenance tasks that we did:
Two of the chaanges that we made last night we kept.
With the new phasing for refl 45, it was no longer a good sensor to use in DRMI, so we changed PRC2 in this configuration to using the sum of refl A and B 9I. This is in the DRMI guardian and works fine, so we've left it there.
We left the DC coupled OpLev off, we think the cage servo will have less drift.
Jim, Evan
We have grown tired of the glitching in the PRM M3 LL OSEM, so here is a script that ramps it off in full lock. It gets rid of the glitching and allows us to recover 60ish Mpc range.
Also included is a screenshot of the usual Euler/OSEM matrix for PRM.
From detchar, here are some glitchgrams to show just how well this works. The PRM M3 LL OSEM was ramped off at 3:43 UTC, and again at 7:13 UTC in a different lock (times gotten by check EUL2OSEM matrix elements). Two glitchgrams are attached which shows that the excess glitchiness goes away as soon as the LL quadrant is disabled. This is fantastic because these are one of our top most worrisome glitch classes from ER7.
Hey @DetChar, can you make a glitch-gram of the H1:SUS-PRM_M3_NOISEMON_LL_DQ? Evan's gunna make a spectragram to see if it contains the same frequency content as the glitch grams (of DARM and the one you'll make). This "on/off" test of PRM M3 LL, at least shows that the frequency content of the glitching is below 50 [Hz]; if the content is similar in spectragram, we can use that -- a spectragram is much easier to make on the floor and/or at least here on site while the channel is being investigated. At this point, the entire drive chain is suspect, and we're not really sure where to start. I worry that starting without a more pointed target, it means we'll be looking for hours, slamming a sledge hammer blindly everywhere, and only come up with more questions. For example, as you know, these NoiseMons can be tricky. This particular PRM M3 LL NoiseMon has passed what tests that have been done on it (see LHO aLOG 17890), but the test is only a "which one of these doesn't look like the other" kind of test, not anything concrete.
Jeff and I looked at a time series trend of the LL noisemon when the interferometer was not locked, in order to give a baseline for diagnostics.
During a quiet time, it seems the peak-peak of the noisemon is about 30 counts, which [accounting for the ADC gain (216 ct / 40 V)] is something like 20 mV pp.
During a noisy time, the peak-peak can go as high as 100 counts, which is something like 60 mV pp.
@Jeff - A glitchgram would not be terribly enlightening. Normalized spectrograms actually show these glitches very clearly, and even standard spectrograms are fine. These glitches only show up in DARM to about 70 Hz, but they're in PRCL up to 150 Hz (first plot). They're getting fed back to PRM, among other things, so all four quadrants' drive signals look like PRCL. The second plot is the normalized spectrogram of LL MASTER, and it's the same as PRCL. There's also something near Nyquist in the plot, but I think it's just spectral leakage in the spectrogram. The characteristic of the LL noisemon (third plot), in contrast to the other noisemon, is that the glitches go up to 1 kHz. They happen at the same time as the glitches in MASTER, so below 150 Hz this doesn't tell us anything. But the higher-frequency content indicates that something before the noisemon is creating excess noise. And since the excess noise goes away as soon as the LL drive is zeroed, it's not just a problem in the noisemon. The noisemon stops showing any glitches once the drive is zeroed, which may be a useful clue. Is it possible to drive a single line in MASTER and see what the noisemon shows? The first three plots were all normalized spectrograms. The last two are standard spectrograms to show that these glitches do show up there. I used 0.25 sec FFTs with overlap of 0.9.
This entry is meant to survey the sensing noises of the OMC DCPDs before the EOM driver swap. However, other than the 45 MHz RFAM coupling, we have no reason to expect the couplings to change dramatically after the swap.
The DCPD sum and null data (and ISS intensity noise data) were collected from an undisturbed lock stretch on 2015-07-31.
Noise terms as follows:
The downward slope in the null at high frequencies is almost certainly some imperfect inversion of the AA filter, the uncompensated premap poles, or the downsampling filter.
* What is the reasoning behind the updated suspension thermal noise plot?
* Its weird that cHard doesn't show up. At LLO, cHard is the dominant noise from 10-15 Hz. Its coupling is 10x less than dHard, but its sensing noise is a lot worse.
I remade this plot for a more recent spectrum. This includes the new EOM driver, a second stage of whitening, and dc-lowpassing on the ISS outer loop PDs.
This time I also included some displacement noises; namely, the couplings from the PRCL, MICH, and SRCL controls. Somewhat surprising is that the PRCL control noise seems to be close to the total DCPD noise from 10 to 20 Hz. [I vaguely recall that the Wipfian noise budget predicted an unexpectedly high PRCL coupling at one point, but I cannot find an alog entry supporting this.]
Here is the above plot referred to test mass displacement, along with some of our usual anticipated displacement noises. Evidently the budgeting doesn't really add up below 100 Hz, but there are still some more displacement noises that need to be added (ASC, gas, BS DAC, etc.).
Since we weren't actually in the lowest-noise quad PUM state for this measurement, the DAC noise from the PUM is higher than what is shown in the plot above.
If the updated buget (attached) is right, this means that actually there are low-frequency gains to be had from 20 to 70 Hz. There is still evidently some excess from 50 to 200 Hz.
Here is a budget for a more recent lock, with the PUM drivers in the low-noise state. The control noise couplings (PRCL, MICH, SRCL, dHard) were all remeasured for this lock configuration.
As for other ASC loops, there is some contribution from the BS loops around 30 Hz (not included in this budget). I have also looked at cHard, but I have to drive more than 100 times above the quiescient control noise in order to even begin to see anything in the DARM spectrum, so these loops do not seem to contribute in a significant way.
Also included is a plot of sensing noises (and some displacement noises from LSC) in the OMC DCPDs, along with the sum/null residual. At high frequencies, the residual seems to approach the projected 45 MHz oscillator noise (except for the high-frequency excess, which we've seen before seems to be coherent with REFL9).
Evidently there is a bit of explaining to do in the bucket...
Some corrections/modifications/additions to the above:
Of course, the budgeted noises don't at all add up from 20 Hz to 200 Hz, so we are missing something big. Next we want to look at upconversion and jitter noises, as well as control noise from other ASC loops.
We observed broadband coherence of OMC_DC_SUM with ASC_AS_C_LF_SUM and ASC_A_RF36_PIT. We made some numbers and plots, using the 64kHz version of the channels. First the measurements we made on OCXO oscillator: - ASC_AS_C sees a RIN of about 5e-7/rtHz above 100Hz (either from H1:ASC-AS_C_SUM_OUT_DQ or from H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11). The same is true for its segment 1. - The calculated shot noise RIN at 20mA (quantum efficiency 0.87) detected is 4.0e-9/rtHz. - The 4.0e-9/rtHz agrees with DCPD_NULL_OUT_DQ's prediction (8.0e-8 mA/rtHz/20mA). - DCPD_SUM_OUT_DQ sees a slightly elevated RIN of 4.6e-9/rtHz (9.2e-8 mA/rtHz/20mA). - The RIN in DCPDA (H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12, corrected for the whitening) is about 5.9e-8 mA/rtHz, or RIN = 5.9e-9/rtHz at 20mA/2diodes (~15pm DARM offset)... - ...or about 3.3e-8 mA/rtHz or 1.2e-8/rtHz at 5.7mA/2diodes (~8pm DARM offset). - ASC-AS_C_SEG1 (H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11) and OMC-DCPD_A (H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12) shows a coherence of 0.053 at 20mA, suggesting a white noise floor a factor of 0.23 below shot noise. - At 5.7mA the same coherence is about 0.13, i.e. the white noise floor is a factor of 0.39 below shot noise. - These two measurements are in plot 1. - Taking the last two statements together, we predict a coherent noise of - 5.9e-8 mA/rtHz *0.23 = 1.4e-8 mA/rtHz at 20mA/2diodes (~15pm DARM offset) (RIN of coherent noise = 1.4e-9/rtHz) - The pure shot noise part is thus 5.7e-8 mA/rtHz - 3.3e-8 mA/rtHz *0.39 = 1.3e-8 mA/rtHz at 5.7mA/2diodes (~8pm DARM offset) (RIN of coherent noise = 4.5e-9/rtHz) - The pure shot noise part is thus 3.0e-8 mA/rtHz. - AS_C calibration: - 200V/W (see alog 15431) - quantum efficiency 0.8 (see alog 15431) - 0.25% of the HAM 6 light (see alog 15431) - We have 39200cts in the AS_C_SUM. Thus we have - 39200cts / (1638.4cts/V) * 10^(-36/40) (whitening) / (200V/W) = 1.89mW and AS_C. (shot noi - 1.89mW/0.025 = 76mW entering HAM6. I.e. we have slightly more sideband power than carrier power (Carrier: 27mW in OMC transmission). - Shot noise level on AS_C_SUM is at 2.0e-8 mA/rtHz, corresponding to a RIN of 1.6e-8/rtHz. I.e. the coherent noise seen at 5e-7/rtHz is high above the shot noise. Dark noise TBD. - The light entering HAM 6 has a white noise of 5e-7/rtHz*76mW = 3.8e-5 mW/rtHz Bottom line: -We have ~1.4e-8mA/rtHz, or 1.9e-8mW/rtHz of coherent white noise on each DCPD. -It corresponds to 3.8e-5mW/rtHz before the OMC, i.e. the the OMC seems to attenuate this component by 2000. -This noise stays at the same level (in mW/rtHz) for different DCPD offsets. Next, we switched back to the IFR for testing. plot 2 shows the same coherences (all at 5.7mA / 8pm DARM offset), but on the IFR. Interestingly now AS_C and AS_A_RF36 start seeing different noise below 2kHz. We convinced our selfs that the higher excess noise seen in AS_A_RF36 is indeed oscillator phase noise from the IFR - so that is clearly out of the picture once of the OCXO. (Evan will shortly log the oscillator phase noise predictions.) 64k Channel list: H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12: OMC-DCPD_A (used in plot) H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH13: OMC-DCPD_B H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH20: REFLAIR_A_RF9_Q H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH21: REFLAIR_A_RF9_I H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH22: REFLAIR_A_RF45_Q H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH23: REFLAIR_A_RF45_I H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH28: REFL_A_RF9_Q H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH29: REFL_A_RF9_I H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH30: REFL_A_RF45_Q H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH31: REFL_A_RF45_I H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH8: ASC-AS_A_RF36_I1 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH9: ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q1 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH10: ASC-AS_A_RF36_I2 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH11: ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q2 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH12: ASC-AS_A_RF36_I3 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH13: ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q3 (used in plot) H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH14: ASC-AS_A_RF36_I4 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH15: ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q4 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11: ASC-AS_C_SEG1 (used in plot) H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH10: ASC-AS_C_SEG2 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH9: ASC-AS_C_SEG3 H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH8: ASC-AS_C_SEG4
Some more estimation - this time for frequency noise: - Shot noise on the refl diodes is given by Pshot=sqrt(2*h*nu*Pr_lock) - The cavity sensing function is P_9_pk = 4*Gam9*P0 * dNu(f)/(f_p + i*f), where P0 would be the carrier power incident on the PD without the IFO. - from this we can estimate a frequency (phase) noise of about 8e-11 rad/rtHz. Gam9=0.219; %alog15874 PSL_low=2; %W Pr_nolock_low=13.7e-3; %W PSL_lock=24; Pr_lock=3.5e-3; %W IMCt=0.88; att=Pr_nolock_low/(PSL_low*IMCt); P0=PSL_lock*IMCt*att; inlockdrop=Pr_lock/(P0); Pshot=sqrt(2*h*nu*Pr_lock); dphi=Pshot/P0/4/pi/Gam9;
For reference, I ran the numbers on where we would expect the sidebands to show a resonance feature. I used the following values: RITM=1939.3m RETM=2241.54m L=3994.485m Checking accidental sideband resonances in the arm cavities: Resonance condition: fres = FSR * (q + (l+m+1)*fTM/FSR) Free Spectral Range (FSR) : 37.5258 kHz Transverse Mode Spacing (fTM): 32.4297 kHz Checking f1 sideband: q=242 l+m=0 Freq. diff. = 18.2284 kHz q=242 l+m=0 Freq. from antiresonant = 0.534516 kHz q=242 l+m=1 Freq. diff. = 14.2013 kHz q=241 l+m=1 Freq. from antiresonant = 4.56162 kHz q=241 l+m=2 Freq. diff. = 9.10514 kHz q=-242 l+m=0 Freq. diff. = 18.2284 kHz q=-243 l+m=0 Freq. from antiresonant = 0.534516 kHz q=-243 l+m=1 Freq. diff. = 13.1322 kHz q=-244 l+m=1 Freq. from antiresonant = 5.63065 kHz q=-244 l+m=2 Freq. diff. = 8.0361 kHz Checking f2 sideband: q=1212 l+m=0 Freq. diff. = 16.0903 kHz q=1212 l+m=0 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.67258 kHz q=1212 l+m=1 Freq. diff. = 16.3393 kHz q=1211 l+m=1 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.42356 kHz q=1211 l+m=2 Freq. diff. = 11.2432 kHz q=-1212 l+m=0 Freq. diff. = 16.0903 kHz q=-1213 l+m=0 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.67258 kHz q=-1213 l+m=1 Freq. diff. = 10.9942 kHz q=-1214 l+m=1 Freq. from antiresonant = 7.76872 kHz q=-1214 l+m=2 Freq. diff. = 5.89804 kHz
Evan, Matt, Lisa We did one more test for the broadband coherence noise: Common mode gain +3dB vs -3dB We see no chnge in the broadband level of the noise below 10000Hz. However, we do see an FSS gain oscillation at 7320Hz showing up in the OMC_DCPD_SUM - but not in AS_C_LF or AS_A_RF36 - in fact that coherence has adip where we get the frequency noise oscillation. This strongly suggests that our broadband noise is NOT frequency noise. Evan also took the frequency noise transfer function - a preliminary analysis here also confirms: the frequency noise should be significantly below the O(1e-8mA/rtHz) noise level we see.
Note that the higher order mode estimates above were made using a slightly wrong modulation frequency. Updated estimates for the correct modulation frequency are attached to alog 20147
- ASC-AS_C GETS 2.5% of the HAM 6 light (see alog 15431) (NOT 0.25%)
Actually AS_C gets 400ppm of the light entering HAM6 -- the OM1 mirror was swapped from 5% transmission to 800ppm transmission in early April. See alog:17738.