Displaying reports 63641-63660 of 83002.Go to page Start 3179 3180 3181 3182 3183 3184 3185 3186 3187 End
Reports until 16:01, Thursday 23 July 2015
H1 PSL
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:01, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19876)
NPRO ROO red - IMC not staying locked - toggled Noise Eater

IMC was relocking but not holding.  Talked to Sheila, and she showed us how to toggle the Noise Eater - picture attached showing the switch.

IMC relocked, PSL ISS came back bad, with the loop being toggled on/off due to power, so Jason adjusted the REFSIGNAL to bring the Reflected power back to about 10% where ISS is stable.

- Sheila, Jason, Patrick, Cheryl

Images attached to this report
H1 GRD
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:54, Thursday 23 July 2015 - last comment - 17:33, Thursday 23 July 2015(19873)
two states named "Down" in ISC_LOCK

On the ISC_GUARDIANS.xml, ISC_LOCK pull down menu has two states named "Down" - why?

Picture attached.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - 17:33, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19885)
Also two CHECK_IR, NONE and DRMI_LOCKED states.
H1 PSL
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:33, Thursday 23 July 2015 - last comment - 15:53, Thursday 23 July 2015(19872)
H1 PSL PMC Realignment and FSS Test

J. Oberling, P. King, E. Merilh

Summary

We realigned the beam into the PMC and adjusted the position of the mode matching lenses to improved the power transmitted by the PMC.  At the then end we had PMC TRANS = 23.3 W, PMC REFL = 1.9 W, and a visibility of 91.1%.

We then tested the TTFSS box that Peter had modified.  We were able to get the FSS to lock with the modded box, but when we looked at the TF we noticed some ugliness between 200 kHz and 300 kHz.  Peter has pictures of the TF and the data so he can post those.  The UGF of the modified box was around 220 kHz, this with the common gain maxed at 30 dB.  It was decided that to continue to work on the modded box, so we reinstalled the original TTFSS box and restored the common and fast gains to where they were before we swapped boxes.

Details

The PMC before we started working:

The FSS and ISS were turned off, PMC TRANS changed to 23.0 W.  We first adjusted the beam alignment into the PMC using mirrors M06 and M07.

As can be seen the majority of the gain was in yaw.  At this point we measured the RPD voltage in both the locked and unlocked state and calculated the visibility

Then the mode matching lenses L02 and L03 were tweaked in position to see if we could gain anything.  Once this was done we had to tweak the alignment again using mirrors M06 and M07 and calculated the visibility.

We then tested the modified TTFFSS box.  With the modified box the FSS was able to successfully lock.  We then measured the TF of the FSS servo and noticed that between 200 kHz and 300 kHz the TF was fairly noisy.  The UGF was at ~220 kHz with the FSS common gain slider maxed at 30 dB, but the noise caused the TF to cross unity a couple different times, with a final crossing around 280 kHz.  Peter has the full TF data with pictures that he will post.  We decided to pull the modified box out and reinstall the original.  The common and fast gains were returned to their original values (20.5 dB and 22.2 dB respectively).

Finally we relocked the FSS and ISS.  Upon ISS relock, the diffracted power went up to ~45%; the refsignal had to be changed to -2.56 to bring the diffracted power down to ~6%.  While this is unusually high, the ISS seemed happy so we left it as is and will monitor it.  The final PMC powers after FSS and ISS relock are:

Comments related to this report
jason.oberling@LIGO.ORG - 15:53, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19874)

ISS Follow-up

Just got a visit from Sheila, the ISS was oscillating.  I found it bouncing between 10% and 0% diffracted power.  What was happening was the ISS would decrease the diffracted power in response to the low refsignal (-2.56 V), and get too low and break the loop.  This then puts the diffracted power at 10%, which is where it sits when the ISS is not locked.  The autolocker would then re-engage the loop, and move the diffracted power down in response to the low refsignal of -2.56 V.  Lather rinse and repeat.  Solution was simple: raise the refsignal until the loop stabilizes.  In this case I ended up setting the refsignal to -2.08 V.  This gave a diffracted power of ~7% and it appears happy there for the moment.

Not sure why the ISS decided that a refsignal of -2.56 V was needed for ~6% diff power after our PMC work, then decided a refsignal of -2.08 V was needed for ~7% diff power a few hours later.  This isn't the first time this has happened with the ISS.  If anyone has any insight, let me know.

H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:07, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19871)
Slightly better dHard pitch OLTF measurement

This time at 10 W.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 DAQ (CDS)
james.batch@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:46, Thursday 23 July 2015 - last comment - 17:02, Thursday 23 July 2015(19870)
Reboot of DAQ system
The h1ldasgw0, h1ldasgw1, h1fw0, h1fw1, h1nds0, h1nds1, h1dc0 and h1broadcast0 computers were powered off and restarted this afternoon.  Updates were applied to the h1ldasgw0 and h1ldasgw1 computers to bring them to the same OS version.  An fsck was performed on h1fw0, which had gone 343 days without a check.  An fsck was also performed on h1nds0 which had gone 272 days without a check.

It is hoped that this maintenance will solve the instability which has caused the frame writers to restart many times per day over the last few days.
Comments related to this report
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - 17:02, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19883)

The restart of the DAQ performed today also resynced the DAQ to the following modifications:

new ISI models for BSC

new CAL-CS model

new Beckhoff C1-PLC1 INI file (added timing GPS channels)*

* I am still having to hand-edit C1-PLC1 and C1-PLC2 files to remove the duplicated PSL-ERROR_[CODE,FLAG] channels from both.

H1 SUS (DetChar, INS, SUS, SYS)
leonid.prokhorov@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:14, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19869)
OPLEV charge measurements
We continue the charge measurements on ETMs.
Some point's of today's data could be saturated due to the other activities at the end stations.
Plots are in attachment. Voltage is more or less the same, and it's early enough to consider the tendencies since changing the bias sign (See alog 19848, 19821).
Images attached to this report
H1 COC (COC, TCS)
eleanor.king@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:07, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19867)
Absorption measurement of ETMX using HWS

Last night I measured the change in spherical power in ETMX during a 50 minute, 25.5W lock stretch (Started ~23 Jul, 00:05:00 UTC) using the same method last night's measurement,  see alog 19835.  The change in spherical power was 20 microdiopters, which means 21.2mW of power was absorbed.  According to the ASC_TR_X_A/B PDs the power in the arm was 132kW (+/- 15%), which puts the absorption in the ETMX at 160(24)ppb.  The absorption of this optic is 330ppb, according to the galaxy website, so our measurment does not agree with this previous value.

Attached is a plot of ETMX and ETMY spherical power change during this lock stretch.  There are some big glitches in the HWS spherical power, which correspond to where I briefly closed the green beam shutters. The ETMY spherical power looks dodgy.  I will adjust the misalignment of the green beam onto the ETMY and see if we can get a decent measurement.

Images attached to this report
H1 General
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - posted 13:07, Thursday 23 July 2015 - last comment - 16:09, Thursday 23 July 2015(19868)
Summary of Thursday Maintenance: 23 July 2015

Things that probably happened, but of no impact to the IFO:

- WP5377 - Bubba, fan, LSB

 

Things that happened:

- EY to check SUS ESD cables, Andres, started 8:34AM, done 10AM, no cables changed

- WP5379 - JeffK, SUS and SEI IPC - done 9:00AM

- HEPI EY transition, Jim, started 9AM, done 10:49AM

- HEPI, Hugh, to EY, started 10AM, done 10:49AM

- ETMX charge measurement, Leo, started 9:50AM, done 10:54

- HEPI blend filters, Jim, EX, done 10:55

- WP5381 - Richard, Vault Seismometer, started 9AM, done 10:43AM

- High Bay door opened, Andres, 11:10AM

- WP5378 - Daniel, Beckoff, started 9AM, done 11:25

- PEM, mid-Y and EY, Vinney, started 10:46AM - done 11:34AM

- WP5350, Jason, PSL PMC, PMC and FSS electronics, Done 12:30

- TCS, Nutsinee, TCSX HWS align, started 10:50AM, Done 12:30

- WP5376 - Jonathan, CDS EPICS Gateway, started 8:24AM - assumed done

- ETMY charge measurement, Leo, started 10:50AM - assumed done

- ETMX PCAL, Sudarchan, started 9:58, Done 12:57PM

- WP5380  - JeffK, CAL-CS, started 12:54PM, done 12:57PM

- DAQ NDS0 full reboot, Dave - currently in process

 

Things that are waiting for a window of opportunity:

- WP5349, Filiberto, LVEA Cosmic Ray Detector, started 8:37AM, still work to do if there's a window, ~1 hour

- Low ESD at ETMX, Filiberto, still work to do if there's a window, ~30 minutes

Comments related to this report
cheryl.vorvick@LIGO.ORG - 16:09, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19877)

Since 1PM:

- Ray Frey in/out of  Electronics Bay, 1PM+

- Richard to Electronics Bay, 2:59PM

- Richard out of the Electronics Bay, 3:13PM

- Ray out of Electronics Bay, 3:45PM

 
Currently Patrick has the IFO and is relocking.
H1 TCS
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:33, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19866)
ITMY SLED beam returned to HWS

Because of the clipping on both edges (left and right) on the first mirror, this is as pretty as it's gonna get. An in-air solution that could possibly be done is to replace the first few mirrors with larger ones. The Hartmann plate is put back on.

Images attached to this report
H1 PEM
richard.mccarthy@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:31, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19865)
Vault Seismometer Installed
Richard M. Vinny Roma,

This morning we pulled our wagon of toys out to the vault to installed the STS-2 seismometer and return the Magnetometer coils to the vault.  After getting lost in the desert we were able to locate the Vault.  The seismometer was installed and cabled.  We know there are signal problems but that can be addressed later.  Getting all the material out to the vault before it got too hot was the goal for today.  After Gerardo powered up the battery charge we had power to the fiboxes and Vault so signals to the mid station.  I was able to confirm the cabling for y and z channels but not x as it is railed at the mid station.  I will continue to work on this system to get all of the signals working.  Probably will need another excursion to the vault to push the centering servo button.

Thank to Vinny for all his help.  I would still be out in the desert had he not helped.
Non-image files attached to this report
H1 SEI
hugh.radkins@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:56, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19864)
EndY HEPI Fluid Level drop solved and Fixed--Yes Accumulator Leak

On Tuesday the fluid level in the EndY HEPI Reservoir was found to be 1/2" lower in just one week.  As I suspected, a leaking schrader valve was the problem.  All seven accumulators on the EndY system are at the same pressure as last week except the one on PRESS2 at the pump station.  It was exactly zero.  After charging, the saliva test showed a very suttle leak and tightening the schrader valve was repeatedly not successful.  The valve was replaced and it seems to be holding now.

This accumulator is charged to 78 psi and losing this one unit is responsible for the entire 1/2" fluid drop.  I can imagine the relation between accumulator pressure and fluid level in the reservoir is maybe not linear.  But maybe close, so at the ends, to maintain the spec of 60-93% accumulator charge, a fluid drop of only ~3/16" could be too much.  But this would be the case if it is only one accumulator.  Many could be at 80% say and we might hit the 1/4" fluid drop threshold.

Let's make this easy: if there is no observed fluid drop, the accumulators are likely fine.  If the level drop is more than 1/8", that is likely outside the typical temperature fluctuations and the system should be checked for actual fluid leaks and accumulator charge loss.

Given that this accumulator is before the second laminar flow resistor and the 3rd accumulator on the pump station, and, remember there are two more accumulators at the chamber before the HEPI Actuators, I suspect this one accumulator loss will have had little affect on PS pressure fluctuations coupling into platform motion.  But, that will be determined by data rather than supposition--so data to come.

H1 SYS
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - posted 11:30, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19863)
New EPICS interface for Trimble Thunderbolt E GPS

The serial port of the Trimble Thunderbolt E GPS has been connected to the second port of the serial concentrator. (The third port doesn't seem to work.) The default baud rate is 9600 8N1 which is what we are using in the EtherCAT terminal as well.

Attached are the new auto-generated screens. An error will be generated, if the GPS is not synchronized.

GPS user's guide: E1500318

Images attached to this report
H1 ISC
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:31, Thursday 23 July 2015 - last comment - 23:01, Thursday 23 July 2015(19859)
More DARM tweaking

To fix the problem of accidental PUM/ESD crossovers near the violin mode resonances, the PUM is now rolled off more aggressively above the crossover (see attachment of EY L2 LOCK FM6 vs FM7, where grey is old and purple new).

Previously, the PUM had an f2 plant inversion out to about 600 Hz. It is now more like 300 Hz. There is also a broad notch around the first violin mode just to make sure that we do not have an accidental crossover there.

DARM OLTF attached (blue and red are essentially part of the same measurement). The high end of the phase bubble has flattened out a bit.

The PUM/ESD crossover was remeasured and was found to be satisfactory (attachment). Additionally, the rms drives to the three stages seem to be acceptable as well (attachment), although these were taken during low seismic activity.

Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 23:00, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19878)SUS

Taking the data from the time in the spectra posted above, I looked at what is using up the ESD range. It looks like it should be fine to engage two stages of low pass filter in the LVLN driver.

The first attached plot shows the ESD MASTER_OUT LL channel as well as the expected signal level after applying the compensation filter for the two (50:2.2) analog filters.

The RMS goes from 1450 to 30000 cts after switching the filter.

Most of the RMS increase would come from a few CAL lines around 540 Hz which are not accurately notched by the DARM filter bank. These filters should be modified when the line frequencies are changed. Also, the line ampltiudes are too large. Probably the line amplitudes should be set by determining what physical parameter we need to estimate with what SNR, instead of some ad-hoc amplitude based on the power spectra.

Notching out the CAL lines would reduce the DAC signal from an RMS of 30000 cts (un-tenable) to 3000 cts (reasonable).

rana.adhikari@LIGO.ORG - 23:01, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19889)
Images attached to this comment
H1 General
patrick.thomas@LIGO.ORG - posted 09:30, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19860)
morning locking summary
The guardian request and state was DOWN when I arrived.

I had some trouble with tuning the VCO to manually find the IR resonance in the CHECK_IR state. The wiki instructions said to use the LSC overview screen but should have said the ALS overview screen. Ed has updated them. I think I was also using the wrong slider. I was using the 'Tune Ofs (V)' slider and it was fighting me. I think I was supposed to use the 'Set Off (Hz)' slider. I will confirm this with commissioners and add this to the wiki.

It eventually reached DRMI_LOCKED twice. In both instances it lost lock on its way to ENGAGE_ASC. The first time was from PREP_TR_CARM. The second time was from CARM_ON_TR.
H1 DAQ (DAQ)
stefan.countryman@LIGO.ORG - posted 06:20, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19858)
Nominal time difference between Timing Diagnostic System's Endstation GPS Clock 1PPS and Timing Distribution System 1PPS
Dave, Daniel

(I meant to post this a couple of weeks ago but hadn't gotten around to it.) I compared ~2 hours of the 1PPS signal from the old GPS clock installed in EY to the aLIGO Timing Distribution System's 1PPS signal and found, as expected, a near-constant time difference of order 100 ns (likely attributable to antenna and 1PPS cable length). The jitter, which is the more important feature, was nicely contained to 3 clock cycles, with a standard deviation of no more than two clock cycles (the narrow bands in the histogram are due to the comparator's measuring time difference based on clock cycles).

The 1PPS signal was present from precisely 6-23 19:52:34 UTC (12:52:34 local) to 6-23 21:52:29 UTC (2:52:29 local), a total of just under 2 hours. I'll follow this up with a long-term timeseries and histogram showing the time differences between aLIGO Timing Distribution and the new GPS clocks installed at both end stations.
Images attached to this report
H1 ISC (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:41, Thursday 23 July 2015 - last comment - 14:53, Monday 24 August 2015(19856)
Coherent broadband noise in OMC_DC_SUM
We observed broadband coherence of OMC_DC_SUM with ASC_AS_C_LF_SUM and ASC_A_RF36_PIT. We made some numbers and plots, using the 64kHz version of the channels.

First the measurements we made on OCXO oscillator:
- ASC_AS_C sees a RIN of about 5e-7/rtHz above 100Hz (either from H1:ASC-AS_C_SUM_OUT_DQ or from H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11). The same is true for its segment 1.
- The calculated shot noise RIN at 20mA (quantum efficiency 0.87) detected is 4.0e-9/rtHz.
- The 4.0e-9/rtHz agrees with DCPD_NULL_OUT_DQ's prediction (8.0e-8 mA/rtHz/20mA).
- DCPD_SUM_OUT_DQ sees a slightly elevated RIN of 4.6e-9/rtHz (9.2e-8 mA/rtHz/20mA).

- The RIN in DCPDA (H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12, corrected for the whitening) is about 5.9e-8 mA/rtHz, or RIN = 5.9e-9/rtHz at 20mA/2diodes (~15pm DARM offset)...
- ...or about 3.3e-8 mA/rtHz or 1.2e-8/rtHz at 5.7mA/2diodes (~8pm DARM offset).

- ASC-AS_C_SEG1 (H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11) and OMC-DCPD_A (H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12) shows a coherence of 0.053 at 20mA, suggesting a white noise floor a factor of 0.23 below shot noise.
- At 5.7mA the same coherence is about 0.13, i.e. the white noise floor is a factor of 0.39 below shot noise.
- These two measurements are in plot 1.

- Taking the last two statements together, we predict a coherent noise of
  - 5.9e-8 mA/rtHz *0.23 = 1.4e-8 mA/rtHz at 20mA/2diodes (~15pm DARM offset)  (RIN of coherent noise = 1.4e-9/rtHz) - The pure shot noise part is thus 5.7e-8 mA/rtHz
  - 3.3e-8 mA/rtHz *0.39 = 1.3e-8 mA/rtHz at 5.7mA/2diodes (~8pm DARM offset)  (RIN of coherent noise = 4.5e-9/rtHz) - The pure shot noise part is thus 3.0e-8 mA/rtHz.

- AS_C calibration:
 - 200V/W (see alog 15431)
 - quantum efficiency 0.8 (see alog 15431)
 - 0.25% of the HAM 6 light (see alog 15431)
 - We have 39200cts in the AS_C_SUM. Thus we have
   - 39200cts / (1638.4cts/V) * 10^(-36/40) (whitening) / (200V/W) = 1.89mW and AS_C. (shot noi
   - 1.89mW/0.025 = 76mW entering HAM6. I.e. we have slightly more sideband power than carrier power (Carrier: 27mW in OMC transmission).
   - Shot noise level on AS_C_SUM is at 2.0e-8 mA/rtHz, corresponding to a RIN of 1.6e-8/rtHz. I.e. the coherent noise seen at 5e-7/rtHz is high above the shot noise. Dark noise TBD.
   - The light entering HAM 6 has a white noise of 5e-7/rtHz*76mW = 3.8e-5 mW/rtHz 
    

Bottom line:
 -We have ~1.4e-8mA/rtHz, or 1.9e-8mW/rtHz of coherent white noise on each DCPD.
 -It corresponds to 3.8e-5mW/rtHz before the OMC, i.e. the the OMC seems to attenuate this component by 2000.
 -This noise stays at the same level (in mW/rtHz) for different DCPD offsets.


Next, we switched back to the IFR for testing. plot 2 shows the same coherences (all at 5.7mA / 8pm DARM offset), but on the IFR. Interestingly now AS_C and AS_A_RF36 start seeing different noise below 2kHz. We convinced our selfs that the higher excess noise seen in AS_A_RF36 is indeed oscillator phase noise from the IFR - so that is clearly out of the picture once of the OCXO. (Evan will shortly log the oscillator phase noise predictions.)


64k Channel list:
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH12:     OMC-DCPD_A  (used in plot)
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC0_TP_CH13:     OMC-DCPD_B
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH20:     REFLAIR_A_RF9_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH21:     REFLAIR_A_RF9_I
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH22:     REFLAIR_A_RF45_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH23:     REFLAIR_A_RF45_I
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH28:     REFL_A_RF9_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH29:     REFL_A_RF9_I
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH30:     REFL_A_RF45_Q
H1:IOP-LSC0_MADC1_TP_CH31:     REFL_A_RF45_I


H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH8:      ASC-AS_A_RF36_I1
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH9:      ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q1
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH10:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_I2
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH11:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q2
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH12:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_I3
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH13:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q3   (used in plot)
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH14:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_I4
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC4_TP_CH15:     ASC-AS_A_RF36_Q4

H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH11:     ASC-AS_C_SEG1  (used in plot)
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH10:     ASC-AS_C_SEG2
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH9:      ASC-AS_C_SEG3
H1:IOP-ASC0_MADC6_TP_CH8:      ASC-AS_C_SEG4





Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 17:01, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19882)
Some more estimation - this time for frequency noise:

- Shot noise on the refl diodes is given by Pshot=sqrt(2*h*nu*Pr_lock)
- The cavity sensing function is P_9_pk = 4*Gam9*P0 * dNu(f)/(f_p + i*f), where P0 would be the carrier power incident on the PD without the IFO.
- from this we can estimate a frequency (phase) noise of about 8e-11 rad/rtHz.

Gam9=0.219; %alog15874
PSL_low=2; %W
Pr_nolock_low=13.7e-3; %W
PSL_lock=24;
Pr_lock=3.5e-3; %W
IMCt=0.88; 
att=Pr_nolock_low/(PSL_low*IMCt);
P0=PSL_lock*IMCt*att;
inlockdrop=Pr_lock/(P0);

Pshot=sqrt(2*h*nu*Pr_lock);
dphi=Pshot/P0/4/pi/Gam9;
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 12:28, Monday 27 July 2015 (19963)
For reference, I ran the numbers on where we would expect the sidebands to show a resonance feature.

I used the following values:
RITM=1939.3m
RETM=2241.54m
L=3994.485m

Checking accidental sideband resonances in the arm cavities:
Resonance condition: fres = FSR * (q  + (l+m+1)*fTM/FSR)
Free Spectral Range (FSR)    : 37.5258 kHz
Transverse Mode Spacing (fTM): 32.4297 kHz
Checking f1 sideband:
q=242	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 18.2284 kHz
q=242	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 0.534516 kHz
q=242	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 14.2013 kHz
q=241	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 4.56162 kHz
q=241	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 9.10514 kHz
q=-242	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 18.2284 kHz
q=-243	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 0.534516 kHz
q=-243	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 13.1322 kHz
q=-244	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 5.63065 kHz
q=-244	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 8.0361 kHz
Checking f2 sideband:
q=1212	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 16.0903 kHz
q=1212	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.67258 kHz
q=1212	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 16.3393 kHz
q=1211	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.42356 kHz
q=1211	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 11.2432 kHz
q=-1212	l+m=0	 Freq. diff. = 16.0903 kHz
q=-1213	l+m=0				 Freq. from antiresonant = 2.67258 kHz
q=-1213	l+m=1	 Freq. diff. = 10.9942 kHz
q=-1214	l+m=1				 Freq. from antiresonant = 7.76872 kHz
q=-1214	l+m=2	 Freq. diff. = 5.89804 kHz

stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 00:19, Wednesday 29 July 2015 (20014)ISC
Evan, Matt, Lisa

We did one more test for the broadband coherence noise: Common mode gain +3dB vs -3dB

We see no chnge in the broadband level of the noise below 10000Hz.
However, we do see an FSS gain oscillation at 7320Hz showing up in the OMC_DCPD_SUM - but not in AS_C_LF or AS_A_RF36 - in fact that coherence has adip where we get the frequency noise oscillation.
This strongly suggests that our broadband noise is NOT frequency noise.

Evan also took the frequency noise transfer function - a preliminary analysis here also confirms: the frequency noise should be significantly below the O(1e-8mA/rtHz) noise level we see.
Images attached to this comment
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 18:53, Sunday 02 August 2015 (20150)
Note that the higher order mode estimates above were made using a slightly wrong modulation frequency. Updated estimates for the correct modulation frequency are attached to alog 20147
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 14:20, Monday 24 August 2015 (20826)
 - ASC-AS_C GETS 2.5% of the HAM 6 light (see alog 15431) (NOT 0.25%)
daniel.hoak@LIGO.ORG - 14:53, Monday 24 August 2015 (20828)

Actually AS_C gets 400ppm of the light entering HAM6 -- the OM1 mirror was swapped from 5% transmission to 800ppm transmission in early April.  See alog:17738.

H1 CDS
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:41, Wednesday 22 July 2015 - last comment - 01:42, Sunday 26 July 2015(19857)
DTT rampdown abort not working?

I was running an ASC OLTF swept-sine template with a request for a 10 s rampdown time.

From the EXCMON of the drive channel, it seems that this rampdown did not happen. Rather, the excitatation continued at full strength for about 10 s and then cut off abruptly.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - 01:42, Sunday 26 July 2015 (19933)

Yes, it appears this feature is broken, at least in swept sine mode.

I pushed the abort button around 06:20:00 Z (around the 10 second mark in the attachment). The excitation continues at full strength until the last second. Then, as far as I can tell, there is some slightly different waveform being written to the excitation channel for about a second. Then the excitation stops abruptly, causing a lockloss.

Images attached to this comment
H1 ISC (DetChar, ISC)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:11, Wednesday 22 July 2015 (19855)
Interesting lockloss that keeps us from locking at 24 Watts for longer than 2 hours

Tonight we have a nice example of one of the particularly troubling lockloss types that we have.  

2015-07-23 00:56:48.936610  ISC_LOCK  NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE -> LOCKLOSS
2015-07-23 00:56:48.936610  ISC_LOCK  NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE -> LOCKLOSS
This is similar to two types of locklosses we had (alog 18777).  AT that time, we thought there were two types, one in which SR3 slowly drifted away, and one in which we had a slow (20 second oscillation) that shows up in SRC ASC signals, and is seen in POP90.  We turned on the SR3 OpLev with DC coupling, and thought that took care of the slow run away.  We are still using this.  We thought that the slow oscillation was fixed by a change in the ASC matrix for AS 36 (alog 18923).   Since that time we have made many changes to the sensing matrix. 
 
The slow oscillation shows up in the SOFT loops, as well as the SRC ASC loops.
 
There is a simliar but more confusing event at 2015-07-23 03:57:49.960100  ISC_LOCK  INCREASE_POWER -> LOCKLOSS.  This one is more confusing for 2 reasons, the guardian was stuck at the lockloss time so it was recorded about 60 times in the log , and because we tried to lower the power at the end which makes the last few seconds unusual.  
Images attached to this report
H1 AOS (ISC, SUS, SYS)
sheila.dwyer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:48, Monday 13 July 2015 - last comment - 09:38, Thursday 23 July 2015(19570)
More OMC excitations

Jenne, Sheila, Evan

We locked at 10Watts with low noise, and redid the OMC excitations that Koji and I did in alog 17919.  We plotted the OMC L excitation against a model with a peak to peak motion of 36 um, and the result seems consistent with a reflectivity of 160e-7 that we measured on Friday by exciting the ISI.  This is slightly worse than what we measured in April.  

We made these excitations with the same amplitudes and frequencies that we used in April, but some of the velocities seem to be smaller.  Jenne is working on doing a more thourough comparision, but it seems that the scatter is better when we are exciting Yaw and Transverse, if a little worse for longitudnal.  

We used a frequency of 0.2 Hz for all excitations.  

DOF excitation amplitude (0.2Hz) time Ref
OMC L 20000 4:39:30 10
T 20000 4:43:51-4:47:00 11
V 20000 4:47:30-4:49:20 12
P 2000 4:51:38-4:53:20 13
Y 200 4:54:00-4:56:20 14
R 2000 4:56:47-4:58:00 15
       
Images attached to this report
Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - 00:18, Tuesday 14 July 2015 (19611)

I'm concerned that the times from the April data for the Longitudinal excitation that Sheila is using aren't quite correct. This means that for the "L" traces we're integrating some "no excitation" time in with our "excitation" time, and using this muddled spectra as the measurement of the OMC scattering.

I have pulled the data from April, and adjusted the start time of each measurement to ensure that the excitation channel was fully on at the start (the [0][0] "time series" trace in DTT), and was still fully on for the last average (the [0][9] "time series" trace).  Since I only had to adjust the "L" start time, I think this is the only one that is affected.  With this adjustment, I see that the knee frequency goes down for L and T. It stays about the same for P, and is hard to tell (almost no scattering) for Y. The amplitude is a little bit higher for L and P, but not by a lot. Since the knee frequency is directly proportional to the velocity (eq. 4.16, Tobin's thesis), this seems to imply that even though we were actuating with the same amplitude and frequency, the true motion is slower now than in April. Is this because we are also pushing around the weight of the glass shroud? I'm not sure how the glass is mounted.

The times that I'm using are as follows:

  16-17 April 2015 (t0 UTC) 14 July 2015 (t0 UTC)
No excitation 23:33:39 04:49:57
L excitation 23:47:47 04:39:30
T excitation 23:59:00 04:43:56
Y excitation 00:31:00 04:55:00
P excitation 00:24:00 04:51:50
Non-image files attached to this comment
keita.kawabe@LIGO.ORG - 16:30, Wednesday 15 July 2015 (19671)

Another thing to add:

Since June 25 (right after shroud thing was done) and including the time this measurement was done, OMCR beam diverter has been open and nobody cared to close it.

Though it's not clear if this makes any difference, any comparison should be done with the diverter closed.

Images attached to this comment
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 09:38, Thursday 23 July 2015 (19861)

Regarding Jenne's comment above, "Is this because we are also pushing around the weight of the glass shroud? I'm not sure how the glass is mounted." - the black glass shroud is mounted to the OMC structure, not the suspended mass.  After installation, the ISI was rebalanced and retested.

Displaying reports 63641-63660 of 83002.Go to page Start 3179 3180 3181 3182 3183 3184 3185 3186 3187 End