Displaying reports 64261-64280 of 84422.Go to page Start 3210 3211 3212 3213 3214 3215 3216 3217 3218 End
Reports until 08:22, Thursday 20 August 2015
H1 General
jeffrey.bartlett@LIGO.ORG - posted 08:22, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20705)
Owl Shift Summary

LVEA: Laser Hazard

IFO: Locked

Observation Bit: Commissioning 

All Times in UTC

07:00 Take over from TJ.

07:00 IFO Locked at NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE

07:57 Set intent bit to Undisturbed – 70Mpc range, Good noise curve

10:30 Increasing noise – Decreasing range – Seismic activity

12:30 Noise starting to decline – Range increasing

13:50 After a couple of small glitches – Range has recovered to ~60Mpc

14:20 5.5 EQ in Papua New Guinea – Small blip decrease in range with similar increase in noise

 

Shift Summary & Observations:

At start of shift had good lock with low noise and a 70Mpc range.

There were a series of glitches between 08:54 & 10:30 – Saturation of ETM-Y.

10:30 – Started to see an increase in noise and decrease is range. Seismic activity on the 30m-100m StripTool plot. No wind. 4.5 EQ in the Northern Marianas and 5.7 EQ in Indonesia around this time. Also had building heavy traffic (for Rt 10) on Rt 10 during this time.  

14:00 – Range back up to around 60Mpc. Took no action during the dip and recovery in range.    

H1 ISC (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:55, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20704)
Damping 504.804Hz violin on ITMY
Using H1:SUS-ITMY_L2_DAMP_MODE2, FM1, FM2, FM4. gain=-2000
Monitor:  H1:SUS-ITMY_L2_DAMP_MODE6_RMSLP_LOG10_OUTMON

This was also added to the wiki: https://awiki.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLIGO/H1%20Violin%20Mode

H1 ISC (ISC)
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:03, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20702)
Damping 1009.6234Hz violin on ETMY
Using H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_DAMP_MODE10, FM6, FM9, gain=-800
Monitor:  H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_DAMP_MODE10_RMSLP_LOG10_OUTMON

Also had to add a notch in H1:SUS-ETMY_L2_DAMP_MODE3 FM10, because it was ringing the mode up.

All this was added to the wiki: https://awiki.ligo-wa.caltech.edu/aLIGO/H1%20Violin%20Mode



PS: actually -5000cts worked too.
H1 General
thomas.shaffer@LIGO.ORG - posted 00:01, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20701)
Ops Eve Shift Summery

Not much to report from me. Commissioners wroked their magic pretty much the whole night. Sheila and I did an Initial alignment at 0:42 UTC. Locked in NOMINAL_LOW_NOISE right now, handing it off to Jeff B.

H1 CAL
evan.hall@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:06, Wednesday 19 August 2015 - last comment - 10:32, Thursday 20 August 2015(20700)
CAL CS and digital poles at 0 Hz

Stefan, Sudarshan, Evan

After recovering low-noise locking, we noticed something was wrong with the calibration: the region from 10 to 30 Hz was too low, and the region from 50 to 200 Hz was too high.

We looked at the calibration lines, we took a DARM OLTF, we compared SDF settings, we inspected foton coefficients, but we could not figure out what was wrong. [Actually, the EY L3 lock gain in the CAL CS model was 1.0 instead of 1.25, but that wasn't the root of the problem.]

In the end it turned out that FM1 of CAL-CS_DARM_FE_ETMY_L1_LOCK_L has a pole at 0 Hz, and the filter had charged up, causing the CAL CS version of the L1 control signal to show a fake, white-ish noise floor above 10 Hz.

We turned the filter off and then back on again, which fixed the problem. However, we can already see that the filter has started to charge up again. So we've replaced the 0 Hz pole with a 0.001 Hz pole.

Sudarshan also found that the CAL CS version of the whitened DARM control signal had a fake 1/f shape between 8 and 80 Hz, which was due to insufficient whitening. So now there is an extra pair of 1 Hz zeros and 100 Hz poles in CAL-CS_DARM_DELTAL_CTRL_SUM_WHITEN.

Comments related to this report
sudarshan.karki@LIGO.ORG - 00:53, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20703)

Plots of DELTAL_CTRL signal before and after this fix was implemented.

Images attached to this comment
kiwamu.izumi@LIGO.ORG - 10:32, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20709)

Just a note:

As for the pole at 0 Hz, this has been a long standing issue and we have mitigated it by not enagling this particular filter (see (B) part of alog 17528). The issue is now exposed again because of my automation scripts (see alog 20617). I was hoping to get around it by clearing the past history of the filter every time when a new lock starts.

H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 23:00, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20699)
A long day
Sheila, Jenne, Nergis, Daniel, Stefan

Most of the things we tried today we tired today were goose chases, but here are the things that we left in:

- We moved SR3 mack to where is was before we turned on the cage servo.
- We (for now) switched back from the cage servo to the OPLEV servo.
- We switched back to the old SRC1 yaw input matrix:
   AS_A_RF36_I_YAW to SRC1_Y : -3
   AS_B_RF36_I_YAW to SRC1_Y :  1
  That's the matrix for which we had done the careful SRCL FF tuning.
- We scratched our heads for half a day about why the MICH_P loop goes unstable at high power.
- We then threw our hands in the air, looked at what other signals see MICH_P (i.e. BS pitch motion) - turns out to be AS_A_RF36_I, with a gain that is roughly -3/2 of that one in AS_B_RF36_Q (at least at low power)
- We punched in an input matrix that includes both error signals: 
   AS_A_RF36_I_PIT to MICH_P : -0.666 (remember that AS_A was never phased for PIT, so don't wonder too much about the I...)
   AS_B_RF36_Q_PIT to MICH_P :  1.0
  With those signals we were able to hold lock at 23W, although we still could improve the ASAIR_90 buildup by slightly offsetting the error point
- This also significantly reduced the drop in recycling signals right after power-up.
- After about 30min at high power, we stepped the MICH_P offsets by 100cts, and noticed that there was no signals left in AS_B_RF36_Q_PIT - no surprise that we lost lock on this signal before...
- After 3h of locking I revisited the MICH_P offsets, and found that no offset, but completely switching to AS_A_RF36_I_PIT gave us the best performance:
   AS_A_RF36_I_PIT to MICH_P : -1.333
   AS_B_RF36_Q_PIT to MICH_P :  0

After than we damped some violins (see above), and turned on whitening.

All this stuff is not in the Guardian yet - to be done tomorrow.


   
H1 ISC
stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - posted 22:08, Wednesday 19 August 2015 - last comment - 18:06, Thursday 20 August 2015(20698)
PRMI to DRMI transition without dropping lock
As part of the recovery effort today we stumbled upon a way that seems to fairly reliable allow us to transition from PRMI to DRMI (we were 3 for 3 today - we'll try again tomorrow).

The procedure is:

- Let Guardian set up for DRMI locking.
- Misalign SRM
- turn off H1:LSC-SRCL OFFSET, INPUT and OUTPUT
- Let PRMI lock
- make sure H1:LSC-SRCL OFFSET, INPUT and OUTPUT are off (guardian turns on OFFSET), and clear history.
- Pause ISC_LOCK and ISC_DRMI guardian
- Align SRM, wait until it damps down. Today the PRMI always stayed locked in this configuration.
- Turn on H1:LSC-SRCL OUTPUT
- Turn on H1:LSC-SRCL INPUT. DRMI is now locked.
- Turn on H1:LSC-SRCL OFFSET, if desired for mode-hopping suppression


Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
gabriele.vajente@LIGO.ORG - 09:21, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20707)

Already done at Livingston a long time ago...

https://alog.ligo-la.caltech.edu/aLOG/index.php?callRep=11340

stefan.ballmer@LIGO.ORG - 18:06, Thursday 20 August 2015 (20727)
Except this scheme seems much faster than waiting for DRMI...
H1 INJ (INJ, SYS)
duncan.macleod@LIGO.ORG - posted 18:48, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20697)
GRB ext_alert.py monitor restart request

As recorded in r11378, I have fixed a bug in the ext_alert.py GRB monitor that prevented it from running.

Can this monitor be restarted at the earliest available opportunity?

H1 General
travis.sadecki@LIGO.ORG - posted 16:02, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20695)
OPS Day Shift Summary

16:00-17:00 Kiwamu confesses he has been tuning OMC without realizing the Intent Bit was set to Observing

17:05 Stefan doing some tuning

17:06 Lockloss

17:45 Fil to EY

18:10 Fil back from EY

Locking summary:  IFO was locked when I arrived (5 hour lock stretch), although at poor range.  Lockloss due to commissioning efforts.  After the tuning was satisfactory, I did an initial alignment.  After some Guardian issues were worked out with Kiwamu's help, we were able to bring the IFO back to Low Noise, albeit shortlived locks.  Commissioning continued thereafter.

H1 ISC
hang.yu@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:52, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20693)
Lockloss tool update

The lockloss analysis tool at "/opt/rtcds/userapps/trunk/isc/common/scripts/lockloss" is updated. Now it will be triggered only when a lock loss from nomimal low noise state happens; losses during lock acquisation cannnot trigger this tool.

Besides, a "readme.txt file" is added to help you use this tool.

H1 GRD
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - posted 15:03, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20692)
TEST guardian node destroyed

I "destroyed" the TEST guardian node, so that we have only critical nodes active during the run.

H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:44, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20690)
SVN commits of SUS, LSC, ASC SAFE.snaps

Today, I finally committed all of the SUS, LSC, and ASC SAFE.snap files to the svn after a few weeks of updating from SDF has gone by.

H1 SYS (DetChar, SYS)
duncan.macleod@LIGO.ORG - posted 14:28, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20688)
Modified ODC-MASTER to read guardian state from IFO top node

[Jamie, Vern, Duncan M]

I have modified the ODC-MASTER EPICS configuration to read guardian state information directly from the IFO top node, rather than the ISC_LOCK node.

This has no impact on the guardian system itself, but means that ODC-MASTER bit 3 is now a readback of H1:GRD-IFO_OK.

The upshot of all of this is that the ODC-MASTER will now not report 'observation ready' (bit 2) until all guardian nodes (monitored by the IFO node) report OK, and there are no test-point excitations on an ODC-monitored front-end. 

H1 CDS
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:27, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20687)
conlog crashed, this time not on a Saturday
conlog failed last night at 18:37PDT, same error. I have just restarted it.


Aug 18 18:37:16 h1conlog1-master conlog: ../conlog.cpp: 301: process_cac_messages: MySQL Exception: Error: Out of range value for column 'value' at row 1: Error code: 1264: SQLState: 22003: Exiting.
Aug 18 18:37:17 h1conlog1-master conlog: ../conlog.cpp: 331: process_cas: Exception: boost: mutex lock failed in pthread_mutex_lock: Invalid argument Exiting.


H1 ISC
nutsinee.kijbunchoo@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:08, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20684)
Violin Mode Monitor Filters Restored

Betsy, J. Kissel, Nutsinee

Today we restored all the band-limitting and low-pass filters to the violin monitor (alog20660). The band-limitting filter gains have been restored to 100.

H1 SUS
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:07, Wednesday 19 August 2015 - last comment - 14:33, Wednesday 19 August 2015(20686)
SR3 Realigned and CAGE SERVO offset rezeroed at better position

Look for a subsequent alog regarding sign change troubles in ASC from commissioners later.  However, because Stefan was lamenting that the alignment of the SRC seemed to be problematic of late, we trended the SR3 PIT pointing during OPLEV damping control epochs and CAGE servo control epochs.  We discovered that the "bad pointing" of SR3 corrected by commissioners on last Thur Aug 13 (20519) was restored somehow on the day the cage servo was implemented Sunday Aug 16 (20571).  So, today we turned the cage servo off, manually restored the SR3 PIT pointing, cleared the offset  and turned it back on.  Note - ON, OFF, and CLEAR were all done via the servo's Guardian.  Hopefully this will help with the unstable ASC matrix problems, but we'll see... 

 

See attached trend which represents the pointing history of SR3.

Images attached to this report
Comments related to this report
betsy.weaver@LIGO.ORG - 14:33, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20689)

Upon further evaluation, Stefan advised that we just hard code the "good" SR3 pointing into the CAGE SERVO, so we're edited the CAGE SERVO Guardian to comment out the line where it servos around the current position, and instead added a line to servo around H1:SUS-SR3_M3_WIT_PMON = 922 (the "good" position).  Stefan, etal are still chewing on this as currently things are still subpar in low noise locking land.  Currently we are ringing up some ~41Hz mode.

H1 CDS (GRD)
david.barker@LIGO.ORG - posted 12:04, Wednesday 19 August 2015 - last comment - 15:01, Wednesday 19 August 2015(20685)
ER8 guardian code SVN status
Continuing on the task of summarizing the SVN status of CDS code, here is the guardian python user code list:

M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_ARM.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_GEN_STATES.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/guardian/lscparams.py
?       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/guardian/TEST_BOUNCE_ROLL_DECORATOR.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/common/guardian/isiguardianlib/ISI_STAGE/edges.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/omc/h1/guardian/omcparams.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sys/common/guardian/ifolib/CameraInterface.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sys/h1/guardian/IFO_NODE_LIST.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sys/h1/guardian/SYS_DIAG_tests.py

to get the list of python files I did the following:

looking at the archive of the guardian logs under /ligo/backups/guardian, I made a list of log files created in the past 19 days (for the month of August). For each log file I grepped for "user code:" to get the source py file. This gave a list of 79 files. For each file I checked its SVN status.
Comments related to this report
jameson.rollins@LIGO.ORG - 15:01, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20691)

Dave, your technique does not produce a complete list, cause it misses the main guardian modules for each node.

A better way is to use the guardutil program to get a listing of all source files for each node.

Here's the list I come up with:

jameson.rollins@operator1:~ 0$ guardlog list | xargs -l guardutil files | sort | uniq | xargs -l svn status
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_ARM.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_COMM.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_DIFF.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_GEN_STATES.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_XARM.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/als/common/guardian/ALS_YARM.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/ioo/common/guardian/IMC_LOCK.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/guardian/ALIGN_IFO.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/guardian/ISC_LOCK.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isc/h1/guardian/lscparams.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/isi/common/guardian/isiguardianlib/ISI_STAGE/edges.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/omc/h1/guardian/omcparams.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sus/h1/guardian/SR3_CAGE_SERVO.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sys/common/guardian/ifolib/CameraInterface.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sys/common/guardian/SYS_DIAG.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sys/h1/guardian/IFO_NODE_LIST.py
M       /opt/rtcds/userapps/release/sys/h1/guardian/SYS_DIAG_tests.py
jameson.rollins@operator1:~ 0$ 

H1 CAL (CAL, SUS)
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - posted 02:40, Wednesday 19 August 2015 - last comment - 16:01, Wednesday 19 August 2015(20672)
Satellite Box Transfer Functions = Flat
I have taken the transfer function of the coil A, B, C, and D inputs to outputs on the Satellite Box (D0901284).
The measurement was taken with an SR785 sourcing the input through a Coil Driver Chassis to turn the input into a differential, and then fed through the Satellite Box.
We expected the Satellite Box to be have flat phase response and gain.  We have confirmed that to a tenth of a percent. (0.1%)
The Reference TF was taken of the Coil Driver Chassis by itself, and the residual calculation took our response from the Satellite Box Coil A over Reference TF.
The following was calculated using Satellite_Box_TF_Plotter.m located in /ligo/svncommon/CalSVN/aligocalibration/trunk/Runs/PreER8/H1/Measurements/Satellite_Box/2015-08-17/.

Non-image files attached to this report
Comments related to this report
craig.cahillane@LIGO.ORG - 16:01, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20694)
I remade the plots above since they didn't show up nicely.
Non-image files attached to this comment
H1 ISC
jenne.driggers@LIGO.ORG - posted 01:19, Wednesday 19 August 2015 - last comment - 16:20, Wednesday 19 August 2015(20669)
ALS initial alignment guardian work (ASC-related)

While Travis was working on initial alignment earlier today, we found that we were once again having trouble turning on the ASC for the X green arm.  I think the trouble was that the DC centering loops' error signals (from the green ITMX camera) were a little bit too large.  This isn't something that happens too often, but it definitely caused the ASC to pull the arm away from resonance.  Engaging the ASC without the DC centering was fine, so it's definitely something with that pair of loops.

By hand, I turned the gain on the DOF 3 loop for both pitch and yaw (which handles the DC centering) to half of the nominal value.  Once the error signals were closer, I put the gain back up at the nominal value for both loops.

Since this is a particularly tricky problem to troubleshoot, I've tried to handle it in the ALS Arm guardians. The modifications were made in the "generator" states, so they are the same for each arm.  The actual gain values for each arm are stored in the alsconst.py file, which is already loaded by the generator states. 

 

I have loaded this new code, but it has not been fully tested, since we have not done initial alignment since I loaded it (and that's where it'll get used).  I've tried to test the logic in the guardian shell and that all seems to be fine, but there's no test like doing it live.  If it is giving errors that seem insurmountable, I did an svn checkin of the as-found code before I started modifying it (as well as another checkin after my edits), so we can go back one svn version. 

Comments related to this report
daniel.sigg@LIGO.ORG - 16:20, Wednesday 19 August 2015 (20696)

This is a sign of ghosts past! I seem to remember that we solved this problem months ago with a delayed boost/gain which is engaged by the WFS FM triggers. Is it clear that going back to the original settings doesn't address it?

Displaying reports 64261-64280 of 84422.Go to page Start 3210 3211 3212 3213 3214 3215 3216 3217 3218 End