Jason, Kiwamu,

We revisted the calibration of the oplev on ETMX and ETMY which showed calibration error of a factor of a few (alog 18218). In fact, they alll had underestimated the suspension angle by roughtly a factor of two. Here is a summary table of the calibration factors:

We also updated the SDF so that these new values are already reflected. Note that the number I updated yesterday was not accurate enough (alog 18218) since I was using the misaligned ETMX. We calibrated it again with the aligned suspension. I attach the measurement data nad fitting codes as a zip file.

Replaced QPD Whitening Filter Chassis S1101595 with S1101628. Keita reported 900 count DC offset on segment 2. 

Similar to yesterday's plot but I've added MICH SRCL & PRCL

See the attached three panel for all the three building Pressures coherence to trhe IFO control signals.

Corner Station had coherence approaching 0.7 with Mich at ~20mHz, everything else is less.

WP #5164

Replaced dataviewer and command line nds tools to remove warning message about communication protocol version being unexpected.

WP #5170

Update control room GDS tools to version 2.16.17.2-1, includes awgstream (compiled against new gds libraries, no code change).

This change fixes printing to files in diaggui and foton, gives the user the ability to set very small numbers in awggui, fixes a minor bug in allowed sample rates in foton. 

For the more obscure changes, foton can be used for non-aLIGO filter development involving non-standard sample rates (using a command line option).  In diag and diaggui, multiple broadcast addresses can now be specified as a comma-separated list in the LIGO_RT_BCAST environment variable.  Also in awggui, awgstream, diag and diaggui, setting testpoints can be restricted to specific models.

Comparison between the control channels used for the signal recycling cavity (SRC) alignment, H1 and L1:

Both IFOs use a AS port, 36 MHz WFS to control SRM alignment, though H1 uses WFS B and L1 uses WFS A. I don't know if this difference is arbitraty or reflects some real difference in sensing. Both IFOs use the AS port QPD, AS_C, to control the alignment of SR2, though H1 also feeds this signal to the SRM, to decouple the action of this loop (SRC2) from the SRC1 loop.

The other thing to notice is that the DoF (degree-of-freedom) naming between the H1 and L1 is swapped. This is just unfortunate and should be fixed.

J. Kissel

I had trouble compiling the 
/opt/rtcds/userapps/release/hpi/h1/models/h1hpibs.mdl
in that where all other HEPI top-level models had no problem, the BS wouldn't compile when the actuator output signals were connected to the DAC via a bus & tag system. I tried grabbing new busses and tags and reconnecting, I tried grabbing a new cop of the hepitemplate library part, neither of which worked. It would only compile if I directly connected the library outputs to DAC.

I'll ask the CDS crew to investigate.

J. Kissel

Plan for the morning:
- Recompile, reinstall, and restart BSC HPI models to absorb changes that were a residual from the HAM model updates
- Install ALS EX and EY models, which have been compiled against the tagged release of RCG 2.9.2 (it had only been compiled against the branch to date)
- Restart the frame builder / DAQ / h1cd0 to absorb new TCS Beckhoff channels and the updated channel list from the new BSC HEPI template.

Bringing all IFO guardians to DOWN and IMC guardian to OFFLINE, and bringing BSC Chambers to OFFLINE.

Kiwamu, Elli

NF1611 photodiode taken from ISCT6 and put iinto ISCT1 in front of ASC WFS Reflair A.  There is 6mW coming from REFL-BS3, then we placed the 1611 behind a 90% 45-P beamsplitter.  There was .4mW of light incident on the 1611 when looking at a prompt reflection from the PRM.   The PSL was running at 2.3W. The aux laser was running at 500mW, 0.5mW reached the pd.  I unplugged the power to the BBPD Refl photodiode (Reflair B) to power the 1611. 

The alignment of Aux laser and carrier onto IOT2R was adjusted to maximise the power of both beams onto the 1611PD on this beam.  I tried to lock the aux laser to the carrier frequency plus a fixed offset using a servo controller, same settings as previously, but have not yet succeeded.  To be continued tomorrow.

It seems that the ETMX oplev calibration has been off by a factor of 2.3 with the oplev values smaller than that expected from the alignment biases. I have corrected the calibration of yaw, but not pitch yet. I will do the calibration of pitch tomorrow.

The attached is a plot of the oplev signal in yaw as a function of the alighnment bias before the correction. According to a least square fitting, the oplev was underestimating the angle by a factor of 1/0.436 ~ 2.3. I corrected this by multipling the same factor to the oplev pitch gain so that the gain is now 81.2 /0.436 = 186.2 urad/cnts.

Summary of the PSL trips from 2015-5-1 to 2015-5-3 during the LHO mini run.  Every instance of the PSL tripping was due to the same interlock, H1:PSL-IL_DCHILFLOW, tripping with no apparent loss in coolant flow for the diode chiller, H1:PSL-OSC_DCHILFLOW.  The first three trips on 2015-5-3 were during the long interlock trip that Nutsinee reported in alog 18187.  Data for the other PSL trips over the last 10 days have been reported in alogs 18083 and 18134.  All times UTC.

Apparently I haven't aloged it last week, but oplevs recive the IR scatter from the arm. It's not a big deal, I'm writing this just for the record.

Attached shows one 7W lock when ETMY OPLEV was not working (no light). As soon as IR resonates in the arm, ETMY oplev segments jump up  and the SUM goes to 560 counts (left and middle row). If the oplev laser was alive, this 560 counts would have been added on top of about 30k counts. Fortunately this is mostly common for all four segments, and the effect on the angle readout, when the oplev laser is alive, would have been about  0.03% of the full range, or about 0.03 urad.

The same thing happens to ETMX (right bottom) except that the oplev laser was alive and that the scatter increased the oplev SUM by only 360 counts.

For ITMs the SUM due to the arm scattering seems to be abount an order of magnitude smaller than ETMs, but the oplev power itself is also smaller (3000 to 4000 counts).

I have created a 10 minute injection file simulating a stochastic source at omega_GW=1 at 100Hz, and placed it on the cds system in:
/ligo/home/edward.daw/research/hardware_injections/2015_05_01/inj10mins.txt
The file was created as follows:
on the h1hwinj1 machine,
cd /ligo/home/edward.dad/research/hardware_injections/dependencies/sources/virgo/NAPNEW/SCRIPTS/IsotropicSbGenerator
python IsotropicSbGenerator.py --init IsotropicSbGenerator2.ini
This code generates a single 600 second frame which I subsequently moved to /ligo/home/edward.daw/research/hardware_injections/2015_05_01/SB_HI_L1-1114555770-600.gwf.
To convert the frame to an ascii file, I tried running a local matlab, but I couldn't get a license. I therefore shipped the frame to my laptop, and used matlab interactively:
>> [data,tsamp]=frgetvect('SB_HI_L1-1114555770-600.gwf','H1:strain',1114555770,600);
>> outfile=fopen('inj10mins.txt','w');
>> fprintf(outfile,'%g',data);
>> fclose(outfile);
...and finally I used gsisftp to move the resulting text file back to the cds machine at the above location.
The above matlab code could easily be used to scale the data by a factor, as it seems you have done with previous injections, if the existing scale proves inappropriate for the injection. Please inject this 10 minute duration signal once the machine is stable and you are ready for more injection tests.
Thanks. 
Ed