[Stefan, Jenne] We were informed that the SRY lock acquisition step of initial alignment was flaky, and could get into a state of ringing up the SR optics. The solution was two-fold: (1) We increase the input power to 10W to improve the SNR on ASAIR_A_RF45_Q. (After the ASC offload step, the power is returned to the original 2W). (2) We utilize the front end fast triggering, for both the output and the FM4 integrator. For item (1), we did a little bit of finagling in the guardian script to ensure that the value of H1:PSL-POWER_SCALE_OFFSET matches H1:IMC-PWR_IN_OUTMON. This is required so that we don't lose lock (due to de-triggering) when we are changing the power levels. Since we're using H1:LSC-ASAIR_LF_NORM_OUT for triggering in item 2, if the value in H1:PSL-POWER_SCALE_OFFSET (which does the "norm" in H1:LSC-ASAIR_LF_NORM) does not match reality (as approximated by H1:IMC-PWR_IN_OUTMON), the loop will often de-trigger even if it shouldn't have, which is why we need those values to match. For item (2), we changed the SET_SRY guardian to leave the SRCL input always on, and use H1:LSC-ASAIR_LF_NORM for triggering. We found that values of 50 cts up, and 30 cnts down were good thresholds. Since only the output of the LSC filters are triggered, this means that we cannot leave the FM4 integrator on unless the loop is engaged. We use the filter module triggering (which was already triggering FM1, a +6dB gain) to also trigger the FM4 integrator. Since the integrator's oomph is needed to acquire the lock, we use a "delay" in the filter module of 0 seconds (it used to be 0.2 seconds).
Nic, Evan
The frequency noise in CARM is limited in part by the dark noise of REFLAIR9I between 30 Hz and 1 kHz.
First, an explanation of the plot traces:
In the case that the CARM loop is sensing-noise limited, the dark noise (and the in-lock shot noise) of REFLAIR9I should appear on REFL9I. The CARM ugf is about 15 to 20 kHz, and is >30 dB below 1 kHz. Additionally, the white(ish) noise in REFL9I from 30 Hz to 1 kHz strongly suggests that we are seeing some kind of sensing noise. So we believe that the sensing noise from REFLAIR9I is indeed being impressed onto the CARM loop, and is the dominant contributor to the OOL noise between 30 Hz and 1 kHz.
We would like to additionally measure the shot noise as seen in REFLAIR9I (with no lock), to see how large it is relative to the REFLAIR9I dark noise. Either way, it is probably advantageous to switch control of CARM to REFL9I.
around 15:37PDT I noticed my CDS overview MEDM was not connecting to the models running on h1seih23. The control room TV MEDM screen was not showing this problem, but new MEDM connections were not being established. I was also unable to ping or ssh onto h1seih23.
h1seih23's console is reporting many errors (several per second) of the type:
nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet.
and sometimes
net_ratelimit: 66 callbacks suppressed
a quick goggle search shows that the internal IP connection table has reached its limit.
Over time new MEDM connections are actually being established. Guardian is not reporting any issues with its connections.
So we are thinking that new channel access connections are flakey, but established ones (like guardian) will continue to work. The IFO team would like to delay a restart of h1seih23 until tomorrow unless it becomes a major issue to IFO locking.
J. Kissel, L. Prokhorov, T. Shaffer Another episode in the saga of the High Voltage ESD Drivers. Though we've not been able to identify why, the high-voltage for both end station's ESD High Voltage Drivers were found OFF. We've queried the usual suspects, and those who were around, and no one has any idea why they might have been *turned* off, so we suspect that they had tripped off from all of the vacuum and electronics work at the end-stations today (the best aLOGs for which are the sparse ops log, LHO aLOG 19462, and VE logs 19472, and 19471). The ETMY Driver remains railed negative. We've tried all of the possible button mashing and cable plugging and unplugging we've either done before or heard has been tried before, with no success. We request the assistance of the CDS team in the morning. --------- As you know, we're still in the odd state that the ETMY high-voltage driver is controlled by the new(ish) low-voltage driver, and the ETMX high-voltage driver is controlled via a temporary Beckhoff setup. Therefore, the start-up procedure for both is different. ETMX - Flip ON the high-voltage supplies' power switch in the racks near the entrance of the building (you'll hear a ~few second loud continuous beep, wait for the initialization procedure to complete) - Hit black "V SET" button, followed by entering in 430 V (i.e. hit 4, 3, 0, then enter) - Hit black "I SET" button, followed by entering in 80 mA (i.e. hit 8, 0, then enter) - Hit red "OUTPUT ON/OFF" button You should see the volts go to ~430 V, and the current go to ~3 mA Now, head out to the driver in the XVEA. You should see both the 430 V and the (low voltage, I don't remember what it is 12 or 15 or something) lights on the front panel showing bright green. You can either turn on the driver manually by hitting the red "start" button, or using the temporary remote system. You'll know the driver is ON when the light above that button goes from OFF to bright RED. To use the temporary remote system, via a terminal on a work station, toggle one of the remote switches: caput H1:ISC-EXTRA_X_BO_4 0 caput H1:ISC-EXTRA_X_BO_4 1 then turn on the second, caput H1:ISC-EXTRA_X_BO_3 1 Once you see all of the lights on on the front panel of the high voltage driver, make sure to confirm that you see a change in the readbacks when turning ON and OFF requested signals (i.e. turn the BIAS "DC" ON and OFF, and turn an OFFSET in each of the quadrants UL, LL, UR, and LR ON and OFF). ETMY (This is the same as ETMX) - Flip ON the high-voltage supplies' power switch in the racks near the entrance of the building (you'll hear a ~few second loud continuous beep, wait for the initialization procedure to complete) - Hit black "V SET" button, followed by entering in 430 V (i.e. hit 4, 3, 0, then enter) - Hit black "I SET" button, followed by entering in 80 mA (i.e. hit 8, 0, then enter) - Hit red "OUTPUT ON/OFF" button You should see the volts go to ~430 V, and the current go to ~3 mA (This is different than ETMX) - Head out to the YVEA (so you can see the front panel of the ESD driver, because these first few steps rarely work), and open the BIO screen of the ETMY SUS. - Hit the big beige RESET button on the bottom right corner. This *may* toggle the High Voltage Driver on and off, and you *may* regain functionality but likely not. - Several times now, the driver has been found to be "railed negative" in which he primary symptom is that the readbacks for every channel show about -15700 [ct], and the channels are unresponsive to change in requested drive signal. Here's what has been tried in the past (ranging from "that's probably it" to "there's no reason hat would have worked anyways, but we're grasping at straws"), and so what I've tried this evening: - Manually turning ON and OFF the driver with the START button on the front, with the REMOTE RESET cable and INPUT cable still plugged in. - Unplugging the REMOTE RESET cable and manually turning ON and OFF the driver with the START button (INPUT cable still plugged in) - Plugging the REMOTE RESET cable back in, and trying both to remotely and manually turn ON and OFF the driver - Unplugging REMOTE RESET and INPUT cables, manually turning ON and OFF the driver - Toggling all of the low-voltage driver binary I/O switches (i.e. the HI/LO VOLTAGE and HI VOLT DISCONNECT switches) None of which were successful this time around.
Opened FRS Ticket #3284 (https://services.ligo-la.caltech.edu/FRS/show_bug.cgi?id=3284)
This seems to be a problem when the HV is removed and the system is not powered down or reset. Not sure why. At EY I powered the unit off removed the DAC cable Powered the unit on re attached the DAC cable and all seems to be working.
Attached is an image of what Richard means by "the DAC cable," which, on the front panel is marked as "PREAMP" and "INPUT." As mentioned above in my debugging procedure, I had tried unplugging this cable, hitting the start/stop button, then replugging in the cable, but this did *not* work for me. But I *must* have done something different than Richard, because he says that this method is the most reliable method for fixing this problem. He did mention that he *did not* unplug the REMOTE RESET cable, where as I had already had the REMOTE RESET cable unplugged (from other attempts) when I performed the power cycle. Maybe the REMOTE RESET cable needs to be plugged in IN when unplugging the PREAMP INPUT cable and hitting the start/stop button.
Elli, Nutsinee
Today we moved theITMY HWS periscope to fix the return beam clipping issue (it was clipped at the lens between the two periscope mirros). I lost the green beam during the alignment (ITMY misaligned) so I left it there for now. The return beam seems to be clipping at the edge of the first iris (the green came right through the center though). *Should* be a quick fix next time (don't I always hope that?).
Scott L. Ed P. Rodney H. 7/6/15 Beginning this week we increased our crew size by one man. Rodney Haux previously worked for LIGO and has graciously agreed to return and assist with the beam tube cleaning. Monday was spent relocating all equipment to Y-End where we will begin cleaning and moving toward the corner station. The lights were suspended and fans located for air movement. The crew started vacuuming support tubes and capping them as they were cleaned. The 1 ton truck was running extremely rough and it was discovered that the air box was 95% blocked with debris from mice. We were able to remove enough of the material to get the truck down there however, we may need a new air box as this one is very damaged with rodent excrement. I plan on picking up a new air filter today. 7/7/15 Cleaned 59 meters of tube including the bellows in those sections ending 10 meters east of HSW-2-096. I recently purchased some cooling vest for the crew which seem to be working relatively well. The ice packs only last 3-4 hours at most and then need to be replaced with another set. The triple digit temperatures are taking a toll.
Chris S. (Joe D.50%) 500 meters of the X-Arm beam tube enclosure have metal strips installed on the upper portions of each joint. We started at the bridge and are working northward. This has been a slow process in part due to the triple digit heat we have been experiencing.
While at EX with Jeff K. and Leonid for an ESD issue (alog to come), I restarted the code for the BRS since it crashed during ER7. As expected it was very rung up, so I turned the damper off to let it ring down naturally over the week.
Valved out Turbo pump from HAM6 at 11:45 am, ion pump is mantaining pressure, currently at 4.5 x 10-6 torr.
Turbo pump + cart still running.
The 18 bit DAC card has been removed from the h1pemmx I/O chassis to update it's firmware. The h1ioppemmx and h1pemmx models were modified to not include the 18 bit DAC.
All Times in UTC:
14:45 Jeff B out to LVEA to move cleanrooms
15:15 Andres out to LVEA to join Jeff
15:26 Karn and Christina to EY
15:36 Joe into LVEA to check on orklift batteries, Fire Extinguishers, eye-wash stations...etc
15:45 Hugh into the Bier Garden
15:47 Kyle to EY
15:52 Bubba goin to MX and EX
15:56 Karen and Christina leaving EY
16:07 Hugh out of LVEA and heading to EXto replace T240 with STS2. Back at 17:59.
16:16 Fil out to Ends to do P-Cal power (both) and magnetometer power for Jordan at EY
16:26 Betsy and Travis out to the LVEA to check for post-vent fodder.
16:39 Andres out
16:46 Jeff B out
17:02 Leaving EX cristina & karen
17:25 Restarting all SEI Models (Kissel)
17:30 Praxair called in to say a truck will be on-site in 15min (for "379" which is MX's CP6) & he mentioned that another truck will be heading to "380" (which is EX's CP8).
17:40 Noticed Beckhoff at EX went down, need to figure out how to remote login and restart.
17:53 pemmx rcg upgrade & pulling a card as well (Dave)
18:05 Continuing Vent clean up in the Cleaning Room (Betsy)
18:06 Heading into LVEA for hose (Joe)
18:10 TCS Chassis Install at EX & then to EY (Sudarshan, Vinny, & Jordan)
18:20 Gerardo said to keep an eye on EY pressure---any alarm for pressure increase
18:22 Gerardo on top of HAM6 (for how long?)
18:27 Kyle opening GV5 & GV7
18:38 Sudarshan turning on P-Cal LASER at EX
18:48 Fill reported back from Ends
18:49 Joe into LVEA
18:50 DAQ restart
19:13 Sheila heading to EX to restart slow controls computer
19:28 Kyle out of LVEA. GV 5,7 are now opened.
19:35 Sheila back from EX
19:48 Fill called from EX. Continuing work for PEM
19:51 Sudarshan back from EX
20:03 Dave re-boot somthing at EY
20:30 Kyle, John & Gerardo to EY to valve in NEG and valve out Turbo
21:15 John called from EY. Arm is open and Gauges are reading inconsistently. (2orders of magnitude)
21:19 Jordan and Vinny to EY WP 5336
21:20 Katie to EY, Mangetomoeter calibration.
21:21 Fil called from EY. While doing cabling, accidentally disconnected 12V oscillator source.
22:11 Nutsinee out to HAM4 to adjust alignment on HWS table
22:44 Dave and Jim at MX. Took PEM down to remove 18bit DAC.
22:47 Ellie out o HWS table to assist Nutsi
22:48 Jeff K, TJ and Leo to EX to debug ESD issue.
Must have inadvertently unplugged it yesterday while working around this rack
Kyle, Gerardo, John
The NEG pump has been valved into the END Y volume and all appears well.
The plot shows 2 hours of the BSC chamber pressure. Initially the main turbo was pumping the station along with the LN2 pump and open to the tube. The LN2 pump had been opened to the BSC earlier in the day and we let the pressure settle over lunch.
With the turbo still connected you can see the pressure fall as we open the NEG to the volume. Next the turbo was valved out and the pressure returns to near the starting value.
So far so good!
J. Kissel WP: 5335 ECRs: E1500216, E1500245 II: 1046, 1059 Design aLOG: SEI aLOG 721 Through various levels of changes depending on the whether it was the BSC-ISI, HAM-ISI, or HEPI main library part (see SEI aLOG 721), there are now the following channels in the commissioning frames stored at 256 [Hz]: HEPIs: ${IFO}:HPI-${CHAMBER}_SCSUM_${SENSOR}_IN_${DOF}_DQ with ${SENSOR} = either IPS or STS BSCs: ${IFO}:ISI-${CHAMBER}_ST1_SCSUM_${SENSOR}_${DOF}_IN_DQ with ${SENSOR} = either L4C, CPS, or STS HAMs: ${IFO}:ISI-${CHAMBER}_SCSUM_${SENSOR}_${DOF}_IN_DQ with ${SENSOR} = either CPS or STS sadly, I only realize after documenting what I've done that the order of "IN" and "${DOF}" is different for HEPI than it is for the ISIs. At this point it's not worth the IFO down time to make the bug fix. Sorry :-(. This closes out ECR E1500216 and Integration Issue 1046 for Hanford, so I'll reassign it to Monsieur Pele. For Livingston to receive this upgrade, one must only update the following library parts, recompile, install, restart, and restore: ${userapps}/release/isi/common/models/isihammaster.mdl ${userapps}/release/isi/common/models/isi2stagemaster.mdl ${userapps}/release/hpi/common/models/hepitemplate.mdl I attach screen shots of the latest version of the relevant blocks in the library parts that I've modified. Also a bonus change that had been pending until today when I re-found it: the HAM-ISI models had not had their SENSCOR BLRMS channels removed, which I thought have been done when Arnaud was here, as per ECR E1500245 and Integration Issue 1059, but it turns out he only modified the BSC-ISIs (see LHO aLOG 19187). HEPI models never had this calculation, so no need to change there. For the record, I made sure - all SDF differences were understood and captured on all SEI systems before restarting - all ISC guardians were in their DOWN state, and the IMC_LOCK guardian was OFFLINE before restarting. - all chambers were brought to OFFLINE via their chamber GUARDIANs - all chambers were able to be re-isolated after the restart of their front-end process via there chamber GUARDIANs - add SDF systems for the new platforms have no channels "NOT FOUND" or "NOT INIT" -- because I removed the BLRMS of the STS channels from the BSCs, they required the re-saving and re-loading the SDF table, i.e. an OVERWRITE of the EPICS DB TO FILE, where the file is the safe.snap. - The IMC recovered after the restart of the HAM2 and HAM3 chambers
Dan, Dave, Jim:
WP 5333
A reminder, just before ER7 Dan found data errors between a Q-Logic fiber-channel switch in the MSR and its corresponding machine in the LDAS server room. The error started after the tape robobt was moved from the CUR to the VPW and its data was added to the DAQ switches. We tried repacing fiber optic cables (did not help), and then Dan purchased new SFPs for both ends of the long haul. In the mean time for ER7 we effectively bypassed the defective switch, sending all the data through a second switch in the MSR. In order to do this, a short multimode fiber link was made between the MSR switches. End of history lesson.
Today Dan reactived the original single mode link and deactivated the multimode inter-switch link. Within the next hour fw0 crashed twice, so unfortunately it does not look like the single mode SFPs were the problem. We have gone back to the ER7 configuration.
STS2-B (ITMY) was sn109827. STS2-A (HAM2-actually located in BierGarten on temp cable) was sn89950. 109827 has moved to endX to replace the T240 that has been there for some time. This T240 will relocate to the ETF lab. There is no instrument connected to the STS2-A chassis and sn89950 is now connected to the STS2-B chassis.
All temporary cable to accommodate the T240 as well as the T240 chassis remain in place. The T240 chassis is powered off.
Here are Spectra for the ETMX ITMY and HAM5 STS2s. Previously, the curent ITMY unit which was previously collected on the HAM2 channel looked iffy. I must say it looks a little bit better now with pretty equal signal with the HAM5 (STS2-C) unit above 100mHz. However, below 100mHz, where tilt starts to play games and things diverge, I can't be sure if it is tilt or a problem. The unit at ETMX now looks pretty good and comparable to the HAM5 unit. Winds where 10-15mph during this measurement time.
Calibration Team
The gravitational wave strain h(t) is given by h(t) = Delta L/L where Delta L is is computed using
Delta L = ± (Lx - Ly)
The sign of Delta L can be determined using Pcal actuation on the test mass. Pcal only introduces a push force so pcal readout signal (truly pcal excitation) is minimum when the testmass is away from the corner station (closer to pcal laser). From the first plot the phase between DARM/PCAL is ~ -180 degrees (DARM lags PCAL) which suggests that DARM signal from ETMX will be maximum when pcal is minimum (ETMX further away from corner station). Similarly, from second plot, since DARM and PCAL have a phase difference of ~-360 degrees (essentially 0 degrees), the DARM signal from ETMY is minimum when the pcal is minimum. This shows that the sign convention for the Delta L is '+'
Also the slope of the curve gives the time delay between Pcal and DARM signal chain. The time delay is about 125±20 us. This time delay can be accounted for, within the uncertainity, from the difference in signal readout chain outlined in Figure 3 attached.
Refer to LLO alog #18406 for the detailed explanation behind this conclusion.
I believe this sign check and the sign check at LLO are correct. For the record, below is how I reached that conclusion: The photon calibrator laser can only push, but there is a nonzero baseline intensity and you modulate the intensity around that. The question is, if you apply a positive voltage to the PCAL system input, do you get more force or less force on the test mass? Figure 21 of the PCAL final design document seems to show that the undiffracted beam through the AOM is what is sent to the test mass, so increasing the amplitude of the 80 MHz drive to the AOM REDUCES the force on the test mass. However, the AOM driver electronics could introduce a sign flip when it conditions the input voltage. To check that, I pulled up PCAL excitation and receiver photodiode data (e.g. H1:CAL-PCALX_EXC_SUM_DQ and H1:CAL-PCALX_RX_PD_OUT_DQ) and plotted a short time interval at GPS 1117933216. I saw that the PCAL photodiode signal variations are basically in phase with the PCAL input excitation, with just a ~30-40 degree phase lag at ~500 Hz, presumably from filter delay. So, applying a positive voltage to the PCAL system input causes more force on the test mass, and anyway the PCAL receiver photodiode measures intensity directly. I confirmed this for all four PCALs (H1 and L1, X and Y) and also confirmed that the transmitter and receiver photodiodes vary together. The PCAL pushes on the front of the ETM, i.e. on the face that the primary interferometer beam reflects off of. This being a pendulum, the ETM is closest to the laser (i.e., the arm is shortest) when the force is at its MAXIMUM. LLO alog 18406 has a comment consistent with that: "Theory of pendulums suggests that Pcal signal will be minimum when ETM swings further away from corner station". LHO alog 19186, above, has a statement, "pcal readout signal (truly pcal excitation) is minimum when the testmass is away from the corner station (closer to pcal laser)", which is more ambiguous because the ETM being away from the corner station would put it FARTHER from the PCAL laser. But both draw the correct conclusion from the data: with the intended sign convention, DARM should be at its positive maximum when the X arm is longest (ETMX is farthest from the corner station; PCALX intensity is at its minimum) or when the Y arm is shortest (ETMY is closest to the corner station; PCALY intensity is at its maximum), and that is what was reported at both sites.
Peter,
I disagree with one assumption in your argument, but it does not disprove (or support) the rest of your conclusions.
"The question is, if you apply a positive voltage to the PCAL system input, do you get more force or less force on the test mass? Figure 21 of the PCAL final design document seems to show that the undiffracted beam through the AOM is what is sent to the test mass, so increasing the amplitude of the 80 MHz drive to the AOM REDUCES the force on the test mass. However, the AOM driver electronics could introduce a sign flip when it conditions the input voltage."
As far as I know there's no sign flip in AOM electronics. Undiffracted beam gets dumped in BD2, while diffracted beam is sent to the ETM.
Unfortunately I couldn't find an explicit noting of it in our recent DCC documents.
Oh, the diffracted beam gets sent to the test mass? Then I agree, there isn't a sign flip in the electronics. (In figure 21 in the document, it looks like the undiffracted beam went to the test mass.) BTW, I've posted a multi-frequency look at the hardware injection actuation sign (and amplitudes and time delays) at https://wiki.ligo.org/Main/HWInjER7CheckSGs.